Call of Duty: WWII

 PC
User Score
4.4

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 989 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 280 out of 989
  2. Mixed: 211 out of 989
  3. Negative: 498 out of 989
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Murdockk
    Jun 27, 2023
    4
    Call of duty bir gelecek bir geçmiş yaparak aklımız ile oynuyor.xxxxxxxxxxx
  2. IniciusV
    Feb 4, 2023
    0
    FPS É UMA MERDA, SHOOTER É UMA MERDA, PRIMEIRA PESSOA É UMA MERDA, SÓ TEM FPS/SHOOTER/PRIMEIRA PESSOA NESSA MERDA
  3. Pluk_Dejv
    Jul 4, 2022
    3
    the story is a total joke, full of B-movie clichés. 11 very short missions max 2 hours played with your finger in your nose, the rest are Beck's movies. The return to the health bar and first aid kits replacing the automatic healing system here works well. Call of Duty: WW2 again takes the flak and lets you shoot down not one, not two, but twenty bombers, which obediently fly into yourthe story is a total joke, full of B-movie clichés. 11 very short missions max 2 hours played with your finger in your nose, the rest are Beck's movies. The return to the health bar and first aid kits replacing the automatic healing system here works well. Call of Duty: WW2 again takes the flak and lets you shoot down not one, not two, but twenty bombers, which obediently fly into your wound. Call of Duty: WW2 drives spectacular moments in the style of Michael Bay films. The atmosphere in the ship before the actual landing in Normandy is completely boring, the same mission in Medal of Honor is full of fear, when soldiers pray or vomit, then real chaos breaks out, you won't find such an atmosphere in CoD: WW2. However, the battlegroup system attached to it seems ridiculous. Daniels can ask his teammates for help in the form of first aid kits or ammunition. However, colleague Zussman only gives you medicine if you have killed a sufficient number of enemies before. You cannot give any orders to the companions and they do not even pose any real threat to the enemies. Every now and then it happened to me that there was a German standing next to me in the trench, whom my partner reliably ignored. I literally forced myself to finish it for the price I want for it, it's really not worth it, you'd better buy Medal of Honor allied assault / Pacific Assault… Expand
  4. Xeculiar
    Mar 28, 2022
    0
    how do people find this trash game good. sh*t campaign with boring characters bad multiplayer with pay 2 win weapon variants and a god awful zombies what's the point of playing this game when I could literally play ghosts and have a funner experience. the game is so bad it gave me aids
  5. StarkAgentos
    Mar 28, 2022
    3
    Поиграл 1 час. Игра постоянно лагает на мощном ПК при хреновой графике. Сложность огромная при тупом ИИ. Геймплей - обычный тир, а сюжета здесь вообще как такового нет. Как герои тут показаны омериканцы, а не русские. Что за русофобия. Локации коридорные. Полное говно.Поиграл 1 час. Игра постоянно лагает на мощном ПК при хреновой графике. Сложность огромная при тупом ИИ. Геймплей - обычный тир, а сюжета здесь вообще как такового нет. Как герои тут показаны омериканцы, а не русские. Что за русофобия. Локации коридорные. Полное говно.
  6. Dimulio
    Jul 5, 2021
    0
    Редкостное гуано. Любимый сеттинг умудрились так изговнять, что игра превращается в невыносимую пытку. Надеюсь, в аду найдется особое место для рукожопых и бездарных разработчиков, ответственных за этот высер. Стыд и позор!Редкостное гуано. Любимый сеттинг умудрились так изговнять, что игра превращается в невыносимую пытку. Надеюсь, в аду найдется особое место для рукожопых и бездарных разработчиков, ответственных за этот высер. Стыд и позор!
  7. Denis94
    Jun 22, 2021
    4
    Activision intentó revivir los buenos tiempos de los juegos de la segunda guerra mundial con este título pero sin éxito alguno, la ambientación no es muy buena y el modo historia es un copia y pega de cosas que ya vimos una y otra vez, parece que estos Americanos no saben hacer otra cosa con todas las historias que tiene el conflicto bélico, el multijugador se siente soso y sin una granActivision intentó revivir los buenos tiempos de los juegos de la segunda guerra mundial con este título pero sin éxito alguno, la ambientación no es muy buena y el modo historia es un copia y pega de cosas que ya vimos una y otra vez, parece que estos Americanos no saben hacer otra cosa con todas las historias que tiene el conflicto bélico, el multijugador se siente soso y sin una gran ambición, se salvan los gráficos y el modo zombis que es bastante interesante.… Expand
  8. Milansan777
    Mar 29, 2021
    1
    The graphics is the only thing this game has going for it. Was hoping for a trip back to "World at War", such a classic...but sadly not the case...not by a long shot!
  9. barinuz
    Jan 7, 2021
    0
    This game is in my favourite 5 games of cod series list, it was a very good and enjoyable game for me.
    Stealth parts are very good and graphics are really awesome. Other remaining missions were also good, this game must be played.
  10. Morgot9
    Dec 28, 2020
    0
    Este juego peco en su momento de la falta de contenido durante 5 meses, si lo juegas actualmente es un juego con rachas cíclicas, una jugabilidad que te atrapa, un sonido excelente, la campaña es una buena manera de entretenerte y los zombies son de los mejores. Creo que lo que le molesto a la gente fue el SBMM (Skill base MatchMaking) o (Emparejamiento por habilidad) que luego con laEste juego peco en su momento de la falta de contenido durante 5 meses, si lo juegas actualmente es un juego con rachas cíclicas, una jugabilidad que te atrapa, un sonido excelente, la campaña es una buena manera de entretenerte y los zombies son de los mejores. Creo que lo que le molesto a la gente fue el SBMM (Skill base MatchMaking) o (Emparejamiento por habilidad) que luego con la llegada del competitivo desapareció pero el error no se pudo corregir y se quedo ahí.… Expand
  11. Sjw-remover
    Dec 19, 2020
    0
    Worst world war 2 game ever. Campaign only features american side. Characters are forgettable. Doesnt have good soundtrack. Multiplayer is boring and infested with lootboxes.
    Players demanded WW2 game after getting tired of garbage futuristic games. This could have been good and refreshing WW2 game if it was done right. At least they tried.
    Advanced Warfare 2 would have been better than this.
  12. D_e_l_u_x
    Nov 21, 2020
    0
    ...................The lack of historical accuracy is offensive to history!
  13. kuhggr
    Nov 20, 2020
    1
    America best Axis and Soviet bad. There is no Eastern front and Pacific War. Tank and plane mechanics are too bad. HP system is like Call of Duty 1. But face textures are good.(Sorry for A2 English)
  14. SefanMucha
    Sep 12, 2020
    0
    The person who designed tank controlls should get fired, the person who accepted them should never again get a job in gaming industry, the person who tested them and still accepted it should never get a job anywhere- should be homeless and die of starvation. That controls are the most incompetent thing I have ever seen and believe me I have seen a lot. Those controlls alone made meThe person who designed tank controlls should get fired, the person who accepted them should never again get a job in gaming industry, the person who tested them and still accepted it should never get a job anywhere- should be homeless and die of starvation. That controls are the most incompetent thing I have ever seen and believe me I have seen a lot. Those controlls alone made me uninstall the whole game and stop playing it.… Expand
  15. Ramiro1992
    Jul 1, 2020
    2
    Crap game overall, awful controls, pathetic AI (partner AI is among the worst I have seen so far, partners won't shoot enemies even while standing just next to them). Add that a shameful and horrible voice acting, and you have a combo for disaster. I started liking this game until I saw the atrocious AI and the artificially cheap difficulty. They managed to ruin a game that had lots ofCrap game overall, awful controls, pathetic AI (partner AI is among the worst I have seen so far, partners won't shoot enemies even while standing just next to them). Add that a shameful and horrible voice acting, and you have a combo for disaster. I started liking this game until I saw the atrocious AI and the artificially cheap difficulty. They managed to ruin a game that had lots of potential, the characters are boring and uninteresting, and honestly, I don't care about their personalities, they act so cliche it reminds me to the awful cinematics of BF 1, a bunch of retards doing the voice acting, I WANT TO PLAY A **** GAME NOT WATCH A ****G MOVIE!
    Expect hours and hours of boring and annoying cinematics. Damn, I miss the old days with simple characters, not these stupid npcs that have the ego so high, same crap with BF 1, I DON'T GIVE A **** ABOUT THE PERSONALITIES OF THE CHARACTERS!
    Overall, one of the worst COD games to date, a spit in the face for fans that loved the classic
    Soo **** boring, that level where you gotta be that retarded woman and show documents to answer stupid questions, is so damn boring it almost put me to sleep. Looks like a blatant and cheap copy of Medal of Honor, that stupid **** and the documents level are almost the same as the medal of honor games for the original Playstation. I hope they added the women to copy MOH and not a blatant and embarrasing attempt to promote feminsim via this piece of **** game. I am sad man cause this game had lots of potential but they ruined everything with bullet sponges enemies and atrocious gameplay plus stupid AI, even for free this game is a **** scam    … Expand
  16. Muismi
    Apr 28, 2020
    1
    Call of Duty: WWII es el supuesto regreso a los origenes de la saga, pero tras haber jugado a todos los COD hasta Black Ops 2 puedo decir que de vuelta a los origenes tiene más bien poco. Es un intento fallido de dar frescura a una saga que está más que aborrecida por el público. Tiene bugs, incoherencia en la trama, fallos históricos y simplemente es lo mismo una y otra vez con call ofCall of Duty: WWII es el supuesto regreso a los origenes de la saga, pero tras haber jugado a todos los COD hasta Black Ops 2 puedo decir que de vuelta a los origenes tiene más bien poco. Es un intento fallido de dar frescura a una saga que está más que aborrecida por el público. Tiene bugs, incoherencia en la trama, fallos históricos y simplemente es lo mismo una y otra vez con call of duty. Toda esta situación está agravada por el hecho de las cajas Loot del juego, que directamente incitan al juego, a la adicción a las cajas y al juego de azar. Por no decir que Battlefield 1, el principal competidor con este juego, es mejor en absolutamente todos los aspectos, gráficos, sonido, apartado online, optimización, campaña, y los demás apartados. Una pena que no sea una vuelta a los origenes de verdad, Call of Duty 2 por ejemplo hubiera sido un buen punto de referencia para desarrollar este juego. No recomiendo a la gente malgastar su dinero en este juego, hay un mercado lleno de juegos mejores que este.… Expand
  17. r03vg
    Apr 15, 2020
    4
    Тир на рельсах с американской пропагандой. Карикатурно, шаблонно, бессмысленно.
  18. Morphine_Child
    Feb 1, 2020
    3
    I bought this game after I got the desire to play some WWII shooter, and oh boy do I regret it. Yes, I knew reviews are not that bright but I still thought game will be fun. And that was my biggest mistake - this game is anything but fun.

    Whole campaign is one over the top action scene after another. There is absolutely nothing original about it, zero freedom of movement. For heaven's    I bought this game after I got the desire to play some WWII shooter, and oh boy do I regret it. Yes, I knew reviews are not that bright but I still thought game will be fun. And that was my biggest mistake - this game is anything but fun.

    Whole campaign is one over the top action scene after another. There is absolutely nothing original about it, zero freedom of movement. For heaven's sake you can't even open the doors until your stupid AI scripted friends do it for you. Apparently you are too stupid to do it.

    AI is dumb and completely scripted like everything else. Sometimes they ignore you from 2m, sometimes they have laser accuracy, effectively killing all the fun of gunplay. Shame really.

    Visually the game is ok, on par with 2017 games, but then again, there are better looking games as well. Characters look good, but they are some of the most annoying characters ever in a WWII shooter. They are just painfully stereotypical...

    At the end... I haven't finished this game and I never will. And just to show why exactly everything in this game is devoid of any shape of inspiration and originality, play the tank mission. Here it's obvious that even people that made it never even played it. If you want to finish it, you have set your controls to maximum sensitivity or else you cannot even turn your turret fast enough to aim. Completely and utterly broken mission.

    Anyway, enough about it. Save your money and buy some old WWII classics.    … Expand
  19. teamfranken91
    Dec 20, 2019
    2
    I created an account to review this game. It's fine (by which I mean bland and uninspired, but I mean it's a CoD SP campaign, so you know), but about two hours in I hit a tank level. The controls were *awful.* You can't really move the turret, except very slowly, and if you recenter your mouse, it stops swinging. You also can't really tell which direction your tank is facing, so you'llI created an account to review this game. It's fine (by which I mean bland and uninspired, but I mean it's a CoD SP campaign, so you know), but about two hours in I hit a tank level. The controls were *awful.* You can't really move the turret, except very slowly, and if you recenter your mouse, it stops swinging. You also can't really tell which direction your tank is facing, so you'll press W to advance and go sailing off to the right.

    This is aggravated by the fact that you're in a compact, urban setting, so you can expect to spend a lot of time getting stuck in corners and ramming into walls. Unfortunately, the point of the tank level is to destroy enemy tanks, which you can *only* do by flanking them, so in the unlikely event that you actually stumble upon an enemy tank's flank, good luck moving your turret into position before the tank turns to face you.

    I'm astounded that it got released in this state. Fortunately it only took me 2.5 hours to get there, so I was able to refund it.    … Expand
  20. Duckers_McQuack
    Oct 31, 2019
    1
    As usual cod games doesn't run properly at all or just crashes. This one a damn lot. Crashes 90% of the time.
  21. TitaniumDragon
    Oct 24, 2019
    4
    Call of Duty: World War II is a generic FPS shooter set during World War II. From the landing at Normandy to the push to the Rhine, you and your band of brothers™ are off to save the free world from the Nazis. Through trials and trevails, you will yadda yadda.

    World War II games have a major flaw: we already know what happens. The course of the war is already set, because it’s based in    Call of Duty: World War II is a generic FPS shooter set during World War II. From the landing at Normandy to the push to the Rhine, you and your band of brothers™ are off to save the free world from the Nazis. Through trials and trevails, you will yadda yadda.

    World War II games have a major flaw: we already know what happens. The course of the war is already set, because it’s based in history. While the actual particular events can be made up, we know the general flow of things, and so it is very hard to surprise the audience in any meaningful way. Moreover, the audience rather EXPECTS to see many things out of a World War II game, such as the assault on the beaches of Normandy, or the Battle of the Bulge in a snowy forest around Christmas, so we not only know what is going to happen, we expect to see it.

    What this means, however, is that it is very hard to get all that attached to the events – it’s literally history. The characters in the game are all affable enough, but they could be… well, anyone, really. They’re meant to be stand ins for all the men who fought during World War II, and they work in that job, but at the same time, it all just kind of feels like we’re going through the motions at this point.

    This is compounded by the fact that World War II needs to play in a certain way to be historically accurate, which means that the weapons we use are not going to be particularly exciting or novel. They are a little bit clunkier than modern day FPS weapons by intent, and that’s fine, but the end result is that we’re playing a FPS using rather standard weapons in a standard war that cannot surprise us in any way.

    And for some reason, this game contains collectibles, which, if you go searching for them, interrupt the gameplay for no good reason. Why are these in a game like this? The heroic actions at least made sense – saving someone or accepting someone’s surrender seems like reasonable optional things that slot nicely into the core gameplay – but searching for random items in levels is just not fun in a game like this.

    The net result of all of this is a game that is like a bowl of oatmeal – it’s fine, there’s nothing WRONG with oatmeal, but we know exactly what we’re getting, and sadly, there’s no cinnamon in sight to spice it up, so it’s a bit bland and watery.

    So it is with this game. The controls are a fine example of modern FPS design, running around, sliding, crouching or going prone, walking up behind enemies for stealth kills, climbing up waist-high walls by jumping at them – but there’s nothing added here to spice things up. The story has only one possible way it can go, the particulars aren’t strong enough to really make me care about the characters (though at least I can remember their personalities), and the gameplay is bog standard.

    It’s kind of impossible to recommend something like this, but it was not bad to go through. It was just kind of forgettable.

    As for the multiplayer… honestly, I thought it was pretty bad. I’ve never really liked super low time to kill, and the multiplayer has that in spades. I actually did surprisingly well in the small amount of it I played – I saw a lot of other new players, probably because of the Humble Monthly – but at the same time, it never really engaged me all that much. Getting shot at kills you almost faster than you can react a great deal of the time, and the same applies to shooting at enemies, and the characters are all pretty generic, without anything to spice them up or make them all that interesting or distinctive. It is what it is.

    The zombies was honestly even worse. It’s amazing to me how, after Left 4 Dead did coop zombies so well, companies continue to make games that are vastly worse. This is just a horde shooting coop multiplayer mode with a single map (well, unless you fork over more money for more maps) with a series of things you need to do on it which aren’t explained very well. It was just kind of a mess to play, and I did not have a lot of fun playing it. The gameplay was only alright and the confusion about what I was supposed to do made it more annoying than anything else.

    For a game with such nice graphics, it felt strangely unambitious. Black Ops 3 at least tried to do some interesting things; this just kind of felt like the most generic shooter possible. It wasn’t bad, but it never rose to the level of good. It was just kind of bland.    … Expand
  22. zNeverSleeping
    Jul 21, 2019
    3
    Bem desapontado com alguns aspectos.

    A campanha me pareceu bem artificial, só me chamou atenção nos primeiros 15 minutos, depois é mais do mesmo; os graficos são pobres. Não há camadas e detalhes que realmente fazem a diferença na atimosfera, e sim texturas bem detalhadas por conta da tendencia ao 4k. Fora que é mal otimizado, puxando 50% da minha 2060 em diversos momentos; outra coisa    Bem desapontado com alguns aspectos.

    A campanha me pareceu bem artificial, só me chamou atenção nos primeiros 15 minutos, depois é mais do mesmo; os graficos são pobres. Não há camadas e detalhes que realmente fazem a diferença na atimosfera, e sim texturas bem detalhadas por conta da tendencia ao 4k. Fora que é mal otimizado, puxando 50% da minha 2060 em diversos momentos; outra coisa que me incomoda são as animações, que mais parecem de um jogo de PS2, estragando todo realismo que a engine poderia trazer - e não tras, de qualquer forma.    … Expand
  23. GGgame
    Jun 30, 2019
    0
    When ı started the game, at first level (D-DAY) ı said this will be good but in end ı said this is the worst call of duty ever. THANK YOU SO MUCH ACTİVİSİON, THİS GAME İS SUCKS. I WANT A KİLL DANIEL
  24. BadgerBait
    Apr 22, 2019
    0
    Is there even a single player game or is it just one continuous cinematic? 5 minutes in and they are still trying to make me care about NPCs. If I wanted to watch a show about WWII I would have put on Band of Brothers.

    You get a 0 because if I don't get any game play in 5 minutes I have to assume there is no game to actually play.
  25. SRKNZ
    Mar 19, 2019
    2
    If the last two to three years can be remembered for anything its "unmemorable" games. The baton in the race to the bottom has been picked up by COD WWII.

    This is really a banal remix of any combination of previous WWII games you care to mention with big budget cinematic's and prettier graphics. Like so many other titles I rather get the feeling this in itself is enough to make a game    If the last two to three years can be remembered for anything its "unmemorable" games. The baton in the race to the bottom has been picked up by COD WWII.

    This is really a banal remix of any combination of previous WWII games you care to mention with big budget cinematic's and prettier graphics. Like so many other titles I rather get the feeling this in itself is enough to make a game sell. Maybe, maybe not.

    What does help is creative varied game play and an acknowledgement that the USA was not the only country to fight the Axis. This gets a quick mention at the start in truth but then its USA all the way. No option whatsoever to play another allied or axis nation which would have made the game a lot more diverse and interesting.

    Whats also flawed in this game is like so many others its reliance on "push button" cut scenes where you try to destroy your keyboard attempting to do something pointless like a early on and quite frankly God awful tussle with a German soldier armed with a bayonet. This could and in my opinion should have been left out. It added nothing and the clumsy approach taken to key/mouse combinations was a usability nightmare.

    In short, in my opinion, this is mediocre fare that's repetitive and feels awkward due to the weird mouse key combo's used in the annoying, on best left in the recycle bin ", interactive" cut scenes. 2/10 from me.    … Expand
  26. rfz88
    Nov 18, 2018
    0
    Calling this a subpar experience is an understatement. This title does not deliver on any fronts (pun intended):

    SP: 0/10 (as expected with all CODs) MP: 1/10 (worse than the usual 4-5/10 in the past) This does not offer anything remotely enjoying in terms of GP, immersion or realism. This is a blatant racist game and an insult to all the nations who were involved in ww2. Avoid    Calling this a subpar experience is an understatement. This title does not deliver on any fronts (pun intended):

    SP: 0/10 (as expected with all CODs)
    MP: 1/10 (worse than the usual 4-5/10 in the past)

    This does not offer anything remotely enjoying in terms of GP, immersion or realism. This is a blatant racist game and an insult to all the nations who were involved in ww2.

    Avoid this like the cancer it is.    … Expand
  27. FOKq
    Oct 31, 2018
    1
    Разработчику, который делал миссию с танками, я бы вырвал руки и засунул их прямо в ***!!!
    Единица, только 1, большего эта игра недостойна
  28. allwititnowsuck
    Sep 13, 2018
    0
    A cheap rehash of Medal of Honor Allied Assault made out of jealousy of Battlefield 1's success,this series is already beaten to the ground,the only series more stupid and repetive i can think of is Grand Theft Auto because of forced controversies.Call of Duty on the other hand is playing safe all the time not trying anything new really. All guns in the game sounds like airsoft guns, theA cheap rehash of Medal of Honor Allied Assault made out of jealousy of Battlefield 1's success,this series is already beaten to the ground,the only series more stupid and repetive i can think of is Grand Theft Auto because of forced controversies.Call of Duty on the other hand is playing safe all the time not trying anything new really. All guns in the game sounds like airsoft guns, the violence is so tuned down it makes me wonder why is it 18+?Because of zombies or killing?With violence tuned down this low it should atleast 16+ unless we are still living in 90s and everything with a smallest drop of blood makes the game 18+....
    Don't even get me started on the upcoming Black Ops 4 this is pure embarrassment,jumping on a bandwagon of one weakest genre's of video games battle royal. If that won't teach them something then there is no hope for either series nor FPS genre as a whole.    … Expand
  29. Psy_pmP
    Sep 4, 2018
    1
    I do not know how about the whole game, but in the single player everything becomes clear from the very beginning. In the first level, you are shown how the developers **** on the players. Run from the fence to the fence, die Hundred times and it's unclear what to do. At this point, I deleted the game. The good did not buy this ****
  30. Fl0wAnima
    Jul 20, 2018
    2
    For 1.2 hours, I already say that this: FULL HUGE
    Call of Duty Advanced Warfare: It was also done by Sledgehammer Games like WW2
    But some dick game is optically worse than the game of 2014 Multiplayer is more or less normal, but if optimization was normal .... The mechanics of shooting are not bad, the sounds are about nothing. Separately, about the game menu, the cartoon: Who did    For 1.2 hours, I already say that this: FULL HUGE
    Call of Duty Advanced Warfare: It was also done by Sledgehammer Games like WW2
    But some dick game is optically worse than the game of 2014
    Multiplayer is more or less normal, but if optimization was normal ....
    The mechanics of shooting are not bad, the sounds are about nothing.
    Separately, about the game menu, the cartoon: Who did this menu, I do not need your help, I can do it myself, I'm so confused that I do not understand where the game starts to look, I waited 20 minutes for the game to connect to the game ...
    This is some kind of not respect for the players from the Sledgehammer games
    Sorry for my bad Eng language , i'm 14 years old Russian kid.    … Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

21
#21 Most Discussed PC Game of 2017
20
#20 Most Shared PC Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
73

Mixed or average reviews - based on 21 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 21
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 21
  3. Negative: 1 out of 21
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Jan 6, 2018
    50
    Familiarity breeds contempt. [Issue#269, p.49]
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 2, 2018
    80
    The new Call of Duty is like a shopping list, in which the devs list one second-rate cliché after another. It's not always for the sake of it, but it's already making the WWII unique that everybody should play. [Issue#280]
  3. Games.cz
    Jan 2, 2018
    70
    A magnificent, but also a sympathetic, unpretentious return to the roots of the series. Yet the campaign is short-lived, and your next experience depends on how much you enjoy the multiplayer and/or shooting Nazi zombies.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »