Call of Duty: Ghosts

 PC
User Score
2.3

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3604 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 474 out of 3604
  2. Mixed: 384 out of 3604
  3. Negative: 2,746 out of 3604
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. dark_elf
    Feb 2, 2014
    1
    1) Single player campaign is dumb & glitchy.
    for example: mission 1: you won't find any dead bodies or survivors after the attack but before that you can see lots of people screaming & running around the street. So where did they go?
    the roads too are completely destroyed & you have to find alternate way in the mission but when you end the mission you escape on a Pick up truck on a    1) Single player campaign is dumb & glitchy.
    for example: mission 1: you won't find any dead bodies or survivors after the attack but before that you can see lots of people screaming & running around the street. So where did they go?
    the roads too are completely destroyed & you have to find alternate way in the mission but when you end the mission you escape on a Pick up truck on a smooth road

    2) Stealth is pathetic. for example
    In mission 2nd or 3rd: the german shepherd has to crawl around & kill every body in a stealthy manner.. How can 1 not find a dead body or even hear the screams of the tangos being killed ? Its a dog bite you get plenty of time to scream.

    3)No decision making.. This has been my complain since long time.. Modern games (especially post 2008) has started giving an option to take your decisions & that would change the result & rewards of the game but there is no such thing in COD

    4) Can't built my own weapon in single player: there is no option to attach a single thing on my weapon. The only option to get what you desire is to find a desired weapon with desired attachment. & what are the odds of that ?

    5) the only 1 point I give to this game is because of cinematic kills in few missions which looks really good. but again If I want to see such cinematic's, I would watch some good movie for substantially lower cost

    6) Not much new In the multi-player section as well..

    To conclude i would say:
    Infinity ward served that same Sh** again    … Expand
  2. BoPacker
    Feb 11, 2014
    1
    It's Call of Duty. If you're looking for another Call of Duty that's just like all the other Call of Duties, this is the game for you. There are DLCs so you can buy map packs for your map pack, and before it's all done, you could easily have $100 invested in the same game you invested $100 in last year and the year before and the year beofre that, and every year for the last 6 or 7. TheIt's Call of Duty. If you're looking for another Call of Duty that's just like all the other Call of Duties, this is the game for you. There are DLCs so you can buy map packs for your map pack, and before it's all done, you could easily have $100 invested in the same game you invested $100 in last year and the year before and the year beofre that, and every year for the last 6 or 7. The game looks and feels old, no graphics or gaming engine breakthroughs here. If you find it for $20, buy it...otherwise, play the old ones.… Expand
  3. TheColonel123
    Feb 20, 2014
    2
    Dont listen to IGN or any other **** reviewer's, They were bribed into giving it good scores. Call of duty is not only a step back in CoD, (a **** franchise) but is infact a step-back in gaming itself. Alongside other CoD games. Heres the decision: Get yourself a DOS PC and a copy of Doom, or buy a peice of **** shoved in a box called "Call of duty". **** THIS GAME
  4. FlimsyLumber
    Feb 21, 2014
    5
    COD Ghosts is exactly how the other reviews state. It is another COD game with refurbished graphics and the same controls. The kill streaks are what you expect them to be. The maps are much larger this time and have vastly more detail than the previous versions. I do have to say that the leveling system seems a bit sluggish even compared to F2P games. The respawn systems seems to haveCOD Ghosts is exactly how the other reviews state. It is another COD game with refurbished graphics and the same controls. The kill streaks are what you expect them to be. The maps are much larger this time and have vastly more detail than the previous versions. I do have to say that the leveling system seems a bit sluggish even compared to F2P games. The respawn systems seems to have improved, but the lag is still prominent. I haven't experienced it as bad as some of the other reviewers, but the fact that F2P games like Team Fortress 2 has better servers is a bit ludicrous. Still it is worth a venture to see the new environments that the game offers. I wouldn't spend a whole lot of time in the game, but it is worth playing, just probably not the $60 price tag on it.
    +I personally like the maps, just wish it had more player support for the size
    -Same formula, same game
    -Lag is very prominent and they have had time to fix this issue.    … Expand
  5. trainiac12
    Feb 22, 2014
    1
    Okay, where to start with this pile of rubbish.The game play is abysmal, with the FOV slider going up to no farther than 80. The textures are a complete step back to as far as MODERN WARFARE 1. There is SCREEN TEARING ON WEAPONS. For how deep the devs pockets are, they recycled what they could, and failed at what they couldn't. The idea that they can proudly say that this is a leap forwardOkay, where to start with this pile of rubbish.The game play is abysmal, with the FOV slider going up to no farther than 80. The textures are a complete step back to as far as MODERN WARFARE 1. There is SCREEN TEARING ON WEAPONS. For how deep the devs pockets are, they recycled what they could, and failed at what they couldn't. The idea that they can proudly say that this is a leap forward in the series is dumbfounding. I will never buy ghosts, nor will I ever buy another CoD again. You have lost my business, Activision.… Expand
  6. Swanzee9898
    Feb 22, 2014
    1
    NO. Everyone giving this a ten, shut up. This game does not deserve a ten. I would usually accept other's opinions and say,"Well that's what you think and I can't change that." But that just doesn't apply here. Infinity Ward, you suck. As a guy who plays A LOT of video games, and not just Call Of Duty like just some recreational gamer who own 5 games on the Xbox that are all COD games. YouNO. Everyone giving this a ten, shut up. This game does not deserve a ten. I would usually accept other's opinions and say,"Well that's what you think and I can't change that." But that just doesn't apply here. Infinity Ward, you suck. As a guy who plays A LOT of video games, and not just Call Of Duty like just some recreational gamer who own 5 games on the Xbox that are all COD games. You wan't to see some games that deserve a ten? Innovative, original, emotional, fun, entertaining games that deserve a 10? Here you go.
    Deus Ex
    LOZ; Ocarina of Time
    LOZ; Majora's Mask
    Earthbound
    Mass Effect (not the 3rd one, ughh)
    Brothers; A Tale Of Two Sons
    Dishonored
    Half Life
    Just Cause 2
    The Saboteur
    Torchlight 2
    The Walking Dead
    The Wolf Among Us
    Infamous
    Metal Gear Solid
    Max Payne
    and Shadow Warrior
    These may not be the best games ever made, and there are much more good, fun, unique, engaging etc. games out there, but COD: Ghosts is not one of them. I hoped I opened up the eyes of you that are stuck in the COD tornado of bland games to branch out to better, more unique or engaging titles. Call Of Duty: Ghosts is in no case a great game and in no way deserves a 10/10.    … Expand
  7. Vendelator
    Feb 23, 2014
    1
    Ive been a CoD-players since the begining of time, i have all the games and Ive played them on all systems. This game is the first to really disappoint me. There was nothing about this game that felt good and or new. Also they made it to easy to use the guns, the graphics where **** and..... im just so disappointed.... Im glad i didnt pay full-price for the game, and i want my money back!Ive been a CoD-players since the begining of time, i have all the games and Ive played them on all systems. This game is the first to really disappoint me. There was nothing about this game that felt good and or new. Also they made it to easy to use the guns, the graphics where **** and..... im just so disappointed.... Im glad i didnt pay full-price for the game, and i want my money back!

    Until they **** them selves im sticking with Blackops and Battlefield.    … Expand
  8. Sennar
    Feb 23, 2014
    1
    Call of Duty is getting worst each year.
    this is the worst call of duty ever made.
    But the worst thing is that videogames magazine give him the higest votes (9/10 or even 10/10) how much activision payed for this vote??? see the user vote 1/10 3/10 i think this is the worst **** ever made by activision no difference between call of duty ghost and call of duty 4 modern warfare 1 the same    Call of Duty is getting worst each year.
    this is the worst call of duty ever made.
    But the worst thing is that videogames magazine give him the higest votes (9/10 or even 10/10) how much activision payed for this vote??? see the user vote 1/10 3/10 i think this is the worst **** ever made by activision no difference between call of duty ghost and call of duty 4 modern warfare 1 the same graphic the same gameplay no new features.
    So please don't uy this game you will only lost your money for a **** game don't buy the next call of duty so activision will make a flop and the next time will create a better game not this ****    … Expand
  9. re1tar
    Feb 24, 2014
    2
    ///Sorry for bad english/// the worst part COD what I played ,the graphics on the level MW3 and requirements4 gb video ram 8 **** SERIOUSLY? the worst multiplayer I've seen in the last 5 years , single company generally crap and should this miracle 29$ **** you in your ass ,go and play BF4 i rate 0 of 2.5 for graphics(requirements/image) , 0 of 2.5 for campany , 1 of 2.5 multiplayer and///Sorry for bad english/// the worst part COD what I played ,the graphics on the level MW3 and requirements4 gb video ram 8 **** SERIOUSLY? the worst multiplayer I've seen in the last 5 years , single company generally crap and should this miracle 29$ **** you in your ass ,go and play BF4 i rate 0 of 2.5 for graphics(requirements/image) , 0 of 2.5 for campany , 1 of 2.5 multiplayer and 1 of 2.5 for atmosphere 1 of 10 totaly **** Not recommended!!!… Expand
  10. Nemesis30
    Feb 25, 2014
    2
    This 2 goes very seriously. I've been playing video-games for 11 years, and I've played about 110-120 video-games. I'm very proud to say this is the worst game I've ever played.

    About the technical section, considering the year and the generation, it's one of the worst games ever created. An AAA game worst than indie games... unbelievable. Gameplay? It's more s***play. I could play    This 2 goes very seriously. I've been playing video-games for 11 years, and I've played about 110-120 video-games. I'm very proud to say this is the worst game I've ever played.

    About the technical section, considering the year and the generation, it's one of the worst games ever created. An AAA game worst than indie games... unbelievable.

    Gameplay? It's more s***play. I could play about 5 minutes without get bored. I suffered a lot trying to finish the campaign (it was impossible, because I'm not a masochist) and the multiplayer modes are just more junk.    … Expand
  11. Fancypenguin
    Feb 27, 2014
    1
    There's an old adage that comes to mind when talking about games such as Call of Duty:Ghosts, and that is "It reinvented the wheel". This game not only reinvents the wheel, it takes the wheel from the car you already own and slaps a fresh 50 to 60 dollar price tag on it, then tries to resell it to you as if anything has changed. And to add insult to injury, you've been meaning to changeThere's an old adage that comes to mind when talking about games such as Call of Duty:Ghosts, and that is "It reinvented the wheel". This game not only reinvents the wheel, it takes the wheel from the car you already own and slaps a fresh 50 to 60 dollar price tag on it, then tries to resell it to you as if anything has changed. And to add insult to injury, you've been meaning to change that wheel for years because its old and outdated. Call of Duty: Ghosts isn't just a crap excuse for a Call of Duty game, its a crap excuse for a video game in general. And I'm not just hating on it out of blind, unjustified hatred, I'm hating on it as a fan of video games that is sick of seeing this series destroy the gaming industry. This game is using the same engine from Modern Warfare 2/3. The graphics still look like early Xbox 360/ps3 game from 2008. There aren't even dynamic lighting effects! This would be fine in an early ps2 game from 2001, but this is 2013. This is inexcusable for a "New Gen" game (using that term, VERY loosely.") The gameplay can be whittled down to a checklist of features we have grown to expect from Call of duty games post MW2. Short, linear, and haphazardly thrown together single player campaign with a poorly written, rehashed and generic story and no character development? Check . Multiplayer filled with hackers, lag and the same respawning problems that have plagued the series since Black ops? Check. Multiplayer maps and lobbies that aren't conducive to the style that online FPS games should be played in (I.E. Campers, jerks and little kids that shouldn't be playing M rated games?) check and check. A severe lack of innovation outside of one or two new game modes, and different weapons. uh check. A game poorly optimized for pc with no fov slider and fps cap, clearly ported as an afterthought by a company that doesn't care about pc gamers. Mother flippin' check! When the biggest innovation in your game is being able to play as a woman (something that could have and should have been added 4 games ago) its time to rethink your development techniques. And to think that i had so much hope for this franchise after modern warfare, to think that I thought that this would be the go to franchise for innovation in the often stale genre of shooters for years to come. Call of Duty is like a metal band that gets a cult following in the L.A underground scene, then as soon as they get a recording contract start putting out mainstream pop songs for $. And will call of duty ever change? Hell no, because they can keep milking this cash cow with minimum effort as long as people have horrible taste in video games. What happened to the old call of duty? Where is the robust single player campaign with bold set pieces and likable, developed characters? Now what do we get? A doge? Wow. Such great, many campaign much camping. I would say don't play this game, instead play Battlefield or halo or (enter name of x shooter here) but the fact is that they're all just copy and paste, cash ins on a franchise name with lackluster single player campaigns expecting the multiplayer to carry them . If you want to play a fun shooter with some innovation, start a new character on Fallout 3, or try splinter cell blacklist, Hell even gears of war would be better than this crap. The gaming industry needs less greedy, lazy franchises like this and more games with creativity and imagination like Rayman origins/legends, Muramasa: The demon blade and ni no kuni. This game only gets a 1 in my book because its functional (most of the time) otherwise it would be a zero. Bottom line, don't waste your money on the same mediocre game as the last 4 installments.… Expand
  12. nrgcoltsfan
    Mar 1, 2014
    4
    A disappointment from the Call Of Duty franchise. Was expecting something alot better than Black Ops 2. You can tell completely that these developers are the same ones that developed MW2 or MW3 for that matter
  13. lukechristiansc
    Nov 7, 2014
    0
    the graphics are ok i am a huge call of duty fan it's just well it did not explain enough about the campaign , it was just was wasting time trying to kill the villian. the graphics for the space mission was just beautiful and awesome. Face it i miss Black ops it was a huge exciting game to play the Multiplayer was awesome , the zombie were was awesome to kill , the campaign was ****the graphics are ok i am a huge call of duty fan it's just well it did not explain enough about the campaign , it was just was wasting time trying to kill the villian. the graphics for the space mission was just beautiful and awesome. Face it i miss Black ops it was a huge exciting game to play the Multiplayer was awesome , the zombie were was awesome to kill , the campaign was **** action pack pure fun. and sersioulsy why would anyone remove the zombie's their ruining call of duty's reputation , Call of duty is know is know for it's story, multiplayer and zombies no one gives a **** about aliens. the good thing about ghost is it's campaign , thats the only thing ghost is about. Grade D+… Expand
  14. NutZdk
    Aug 28, 2014
    2
    This is a new low for the COD games, the quality has been steadily decreasing ever since Modern Warfare 1. The difference between normal and hardcore gamemode has been lowered to a point where it doesnt seem like there is any difference anymore.
    The whole feel of the game - gunplay and movement especially feels cheap and rushed, which again is about what you can expect from a yearly no    This is a new low for the COD games, the quality has been steadily decreasing ever since Modern Warfare 1. The difference between normal and hardcore gamemode has been lowered to a point where it doesnt seem like there is any difference anymore.
    The whole feel of the game - gunplay and movement especially feels cheap and rushed, which again is about what you can expect from a yearly no effort production.
    On a positive note the singleplayer campaign is actually worth playing, which I dont think could be said about Modern Warfare 3.
    Im sure this wreck of a multiplayer experience has scared off enough players from getting another CoD game for a while. Myself included!    … Expand
  15. Sies
    Mar 5, 2014
    5
    CoDG hat was von einer Wettervorhersage: Verspricht einem Badewetter und wenn du dann schon in Badeklamotten bist regnet es. Grafisch geht es einiger Maßen, einige Texturen sind wirklich gut und hochauflösend, vom Sound her auch Parabel. Der eigentliche Held des Spieles der Feuerlöscher! Der ist nämlich genau so nichts sagend wie der Protagonist selbst. Der Hund ist ein ***** Instakill undCoDG hat was von einer Wettervorhersage: Verspricht einem Badewetter und wenn du dann schon in Badeklamotten bist regnet es. Grafisch geht es einiger Maßen, einige Texturen sind wirklich gut und hochauflösend, vom Sound her auch Parabel. Der eigentliche Held des Spieles der Feuerlöscher! Der ist nämlich genau so nichts sagend wie der Protagonist selbst. Der Hund ist ein ***** Instakill und kein sinnvoller Begleiter wie man es sich erhofft hatte. Die Story ist so dicht und spannend wie eine Wasserflasche mit Löchern die ganz gemütlich ausläuft. Zum Gameplay ... ja wer hätte es anders erwartet laufe von A nach B knall alles ab was nicht zu dir gehört und betrachte die Skriptevents.
    Beim Ersten Durchlauf habe ich 6-7 Stunden gebraucht und ich hab mir dabei Zeit gelassen.
    Zum Schluß kann ich nur sagen Gott sei Dank gibt es nun Familiesharing auf Steam und ich habe mir nicht kaufen müssen.

    PS.: Habe den Multiplayer nicht gespielt aber ich wage zu bezweifeln das er besser ist als der von CoDMW3    … Expand
  16. ZRose
    Mar 5, 2014
    1
    I honestly don't understand what goes through your mind when you buy a COD game. "Oh - it will be innovative.", "Oh, it's the only FPS that does what it does"

    If you want an actual FPS get Counter Strike: GO on PC or Battlefield: Bad Company 2/Battlefield 4.
  17. pahammer
    Mar 12, 2014
    2
    Positively the last CoD game I will buy. What a waste. There is nothing new here since Black Ops 2 disappointed me. I still go back to the original Black ops as the pick of the litter.
  18. Mistval
    Mar 12, 2014
    1
    PLEASE don't but this game. I'm BEGGING you not to buy this game. It might seem strange that I care so much whether someone else buys a game or not, but I feel I have a duty to humanity to save as many people as possible from this game.

    This game really is just worthless. I felt that way about MW3 too, but this is worse. The multiplayer is just one big zerg rush and the single player    PLEASE don't but this game. I'm BEGGING you not to buy this game. It might seem strange that I care so much whether someone else buys a game or not, but I feel I have a duty to humanity to save as many people as possible from this game.

    This game really is just worthless. I felt that way about MW3 too, but this is worse. The multiplayer is just one big zerg rush and the single player story is stupid. It only took a few hours of play at a friend's house to decide I never want to play this game again.

    Now that I am calming down a bit let me spin you a tale of love, adventure, and ultimate disillusionment.

    Once upon a time I was twelve years old or so and I played a lot of Age of Mythology. Some of my clan mates played the original Call of Duty back before any of the sequels hit the scene.

    One day I was at Walmart with my dad a bit after my birthday. I had some birthday money and I said I wanted to buy a game in the electronics section. When I returned I was holding, in my little innocent hands, the first Call of Duty game. On the cover was some dude with a gun wearing a helmet and some explosions going off and stuff. My dad thought about it for a second and shrugged, "I guess you're old enough now".

    And so it began. It was my first FPS game and I was hooked quickly. I fondly remember hanging out in Pavlov's House with my Mosin-Nagant and lancing down the advancing enemy Nazis. Actually I liked even more to hang out in that little building to the side of Pavlov's House that no one ever goes in. I had a stealthy play-style and I liked to go around the back of my enemies and shoot them up without them knowing where I was. Those were the days...

    Next came Call of Duty United Offensive, one of only two CoD games since the first that was actually innovative.

    Then CoD2. Better graphics, same great gameplay, good maps. Not very innovative but nonetheless a good update to the series.

    CoD3??? That was a thing?

    Then came Modern Warfare. I liked the first MW game quite a bit. It still felt pretty tactical to me. It was a fairly good translation of classic CoD gameplay to a modern setting. Unfortunately this game somehow attracted a lot of very annoying players.

    MW2, An OK game. I never bought it, but my roommate had it and we played some. This was the first CoD game I played that I didn't feel compelled to buy. It seemed like they had struck a pretty good formula in MW1 and then sat down and thought, "well crap, what do we do to make another game now? I guess we just have to keep adding crap" and that made MW2 a sort of bloated version of MW1 with its super annoying killstreak bonus system. The maps also got tighter and my stealthy play-style wasn't as rewarding.

    I got MW3 for Christmas just a couple of years ago when I was 19 I suppose. I played it for 2 or 3 hours and have not played it since. What made it suck so much worse than MW2, which was already really not that great, was the further shift in style towards a fast paced twitch shooter where everyone just runs in each others faces and trades kills. The multiplayer experience had no depth whatsoever. It was dumb. I went back to playing Reach and MW1 on the same day.

    Now Ghosts... Ghosts takes this trend and continues it and I have to believe it is the conclusion of this downward spiral because as far as I'm concerned it can't get much worse. It's just people jumping on each other while holding guns. It's obnoxious.

    (I know I technically missed mentioning like 5 other CoD games too)

    I haven't even talked about campaign but it was actually pretty good in the first two games. The story was WW2 history, can't really go wrong there, and gameplay was pretty exciting. MW1 was where that ended. Like I said I liked MW1 but the campaign was dumb and it hasn't gotten better in subsequent games.

    Anyways, save yourself while you still can.    … Expand
  19. Barut6
    Mar 13, 2014
    0
    Alright, right off the bat this game is guilty of having the same problems like any other Call of Duty game. It requires little to skill to rack up kills, its not user friendly to beginners, and it has a very short campaign that has a terrible story that makes no sense. The campaign was only 3 HOURS! Its storyline didn't add up and the way the creators made it in the future to explain itAlright, right off the bat this game is guilty of having the same problems like any other Call of Duty game. It requires little to skill to rack up kills, its not user friendly to beginners, and it has a very short campaign that has a terrible story that makes no sense. The campaign was only 3 HOURS! Its storyline didn't add up and the way the creators made it in the future to explain it just made it worse. The game play, just like any other FPS is a clone of its predecessors and the new "controls" were just awkward. The multilayer, oh the multilayer. Its the worst multilayer in the entire franchise. Its like they're go to thing; how could they mess that up? Just another terrible game they push forward in 11 months to get their quick payday from blind fans.… Expand
  20. Webico
    Mar 13, 2014
    0
    simplesmente a triste COD foi destruída, lembro quando o jogo e referencia em FPS...pois agora ele a cada edição não evolui e regride...não acompanha a evolução ...triste ver a morte deste grande game :(
  21. Psychedelic
    Mar 14, 2014
    0
    A Activision e a IW simplesmente fizeram qualquer merda e mandaram para os pc gamers, jogo pesado, totalmente mal optimizado, gráficos do mw2, texturas terríveis para os requisitos do jogo, esse jogo que dizia ter uma engine nova, melhorada, muito boa, na verdade, foi só marketing, vai tomar no ¬¬ IW, ate trocarem de engine e fizerem uma coisa decente, eu não compro, nem pirata eu pego.
  22. plrusek
    Mar 24, 2014
    1
    critics are full of crap in this one. nice one ign. 9/10. because the call of duty game-play still remains in this game and i have to say - i like the call of duty game-play - it's fast, relies on reflex and also i like the perks. - it's going to place a little bit better but anyway - this game... abomination.
  23. GT123
    Mar 30, 2014
    0
    Where can I start. This is by far the WORST game I have ever played in my entire life. It's also the only game I have ever regretted buying. The graphics are complete and utter garbage, and considering this, you'd think this game would at least run well. WRONG. I have a GTX 670, which I think is more than enough to play a game like this at 1080p with no stuttering, but no. The gameWhere can I start. This is by far the WORST game I have ever played in my entire life. It's also the only game I have ever regretted buying. The graphics are complete and utter garbage, and considering this, you'd think this game would at least run well. WRONG. I have a GTX 670, which I think is more than enough to play a game like this at 1080p with no stuttering, but no. The game stutters and freezes all the time, and when you ADS, it gets even worse. Then, there is the lack of an FOV slider. I don't quite understand what they were thinking with this, how can you make a game that is played in first person, without an FOV slider.

    After all the graphical faults, the game play is just as bad, if not worse. In previous Call of Duty games, you could lean by pressing a pre-determined button, but now that they have to add this to the new consoles, they decide to ruin it for PC players as well. There's also the unlocking system that was in some previous CoD games (not Black Ops 2) that nobody I know of liked, so they decided to bring it back... What are you thinking Activision? It's almost as if they are trying to make this a horrible game. Then, there are the mouse sensitivity jumps. I don't know what causes this, but seemly at random times, the mouse randomly changes sensitivity, making it very difficult to play.

    If anyone reading this is thinking about buying this game, even after seeing all these low scores, don't.. Just don't. I pre-ordered it, thinking it would be an improvement over Black Ops 2 (an amazing game) but came to realize in the first hour of playing it, that it was an awful game. I have tried and tried again to give it another chance because I want to like it. Maybe it's because I don't want to feel like I wasted $60 on a POS game, but I can't.

    Recently, I was playing just to get the last of my cards from the game, and maybe make $0.50, so I would have enough in my Steam wallet to buy Goat Simulator when it comes out. I played for under an hour, and the game makes my second monitor go black, crashes twice, and forcibly changes my Windows them from Aero to basic.

    Overall, I hope no one buys this game in the future, and I wish that I nor anyone else wasted there money on this game in the past. I will never buy another CoD game again, and I hope that Activision goes out of business after this fail of a game. (I know this will not happen, but one can dream)

    TL:DR Don't buy this POS game.    … Expand
  24. tankianserj94
    Mar 31, 2014
    0
    The first cod game I played is modern warfare 2. at that time, i was stunned with the game SP. never played multiplayer though. then i started to play other series of cod from the first cod to black ops 2. then i realised the game was simply almost identical, and the development of each game is minimal (i mean, true game development is like comparing half-life and half-life 2, majorThe first cod game I played is modern warfare 2. at that time, i was stunned with the game SP. never played multiplayer though. then i started to play other series of cod from the first cod to black ops 2. then i realised the game was simply almost identical, and the development of each game is minimal (i mean, true game development is like comparing half-life and half-life 2, major development [old game though]). i only play cod games just fort he SP storyline, which is thee only thing i enjoyed from it. cod ghosts is a __________* game. comparing to BO2, it demands a lot of spec. 6gb ram!? __________* I've even rebooted my pc to 64 bit windows just to meet its requirements. i cant afford to buy high-end PCs, but my crappy laptop even can play BO2, Farcry 3 on high settings, and the fps is still acceptable ~30fps, running on outdated 2.00GHz cpu, 2GB ram and amd graphics. i didnt have the chance to play cod ghosts for not having the minimum specs. watched youtube on its walkthrough (having even more fun, the player makes critics and comments while playing it :D) and the graphics ain't that cool, i mean ___________!!!!!* wasted money on buying pirated dvds. luckily other CODs i just downloaded it from cybercafes, haha in your face developers!!! ou aint gettting a cent from me!!! i'm done talking

    *please fill in the blank with your own swears and curses
    ** why cant i rate this game -10?    … Expand
  25. ZionSype
    Apr 2, 2014
    0
    Call of Duty, just stop trying. At this point the Call of Duty games are being bought for no other reason than just to be bought. I haven't bought a CoD game since World at War, where it should have ended.
  26. Goldman77
    Oct 4, 2014
    10
    The moment I saw that COD had Eminem's name tag on it, I knew that I had to buy this game. The Campaign is amazing, the ending is suspenseful. Dammit you guys must play this game!!
  27. SanicFire2000
    Apr 7, 2014
    7
    Call of Duty: Ghosts is a... overhated game. That means that this game gets more hate than what it should be. Not saying that this is the greatest Call of Duty ever. That merit goes to Modern Warfare 2. But it shouldn't be deserving 2s and 1s from accounts that are made by people for the absolute purpose of bringing this game to its knees. Be warned. There will be haters galore.

    So,    Call of Duty: Ghosts is a... overhated game. That means that this game gets more hate than what it should be. Not saying that this is the greatest Call of Duty ever. That merit goes to Modern Warfare 2. But it shouldn't be deserving 2s and 1s from accounts that are made by people for the absolute purpose of bringing this game to its knees. Be warned. There will be haters galore.

    So, with all that aside, lets get started.

    Ghosts has great multiplayer, and it is getting better over time. However that doesn't stop the game community from ruining it completely.
    Glitchers, exploiters, aimbots, triggerbots, and hackers still lurk in Ghosts, and it takes the fun out of the game's Multiplayer, but it again is being cracked down on.

    I've never played the campaign, and I have heard of the copy-paste scenes from MW2, but right now, that's all I have now on the Campaign mode.

    The last thing that there is in Ghosts is the new mode, Extinction. And it involves shooting aliens to survive while carrying out tasks to do away with the extraterrestrial beings like drilling through hives, and defending said drill from the aliens. It's actually really fun once you get good at it. Overall, Extinction is a fun zombie-like mode, but it is REALLY hard on the first try.

    There are some things that I find in the **** reviews that boggles my mind, so I'll go over them.

    BO2 and Ghosts are made by 2 different companies. Bugs may not be addressed by the same company, so don't think that Ghosts will address the same issues, because Infinity Ward **** up a lot.

    Hmmm... I think I have said enough. So for now, goodbye.    … Expand
  28. crazyrocky2684
    Apr 15, 2014
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. So here goes my in depth review of multiplayer only, because face it that is the only reason people play COD. So your thrust into a world with future weapons representing copy and paste clones of previous weapons with new textures. You can literally find copy and paste objects from previous installments of COD. Cars are indestructible btw.
    So I play and after a while I get the hang of it and start getting good because yes it does play a bit different. The only thing is that the killstreaks make no sense, except the dog, oh wait should I say wolf. Yes you can change your dog into a wolf. So I go on a miniature rampage and get a ten kill killstreak. Awesome right?! Sadly to say it is not. My "reward" for getting ten kills in a row without dying (if you hate dying 6-8 times in a row do not play this game) is a suit of armor. Sounds cool right? Nope because your armor removes all of your guns. Your left with only a knife. A knife. Yes. A damn knife. So ten kills in a row your reward is to be stripped down to a knife which you already had to start the match with.
    So I say screw that kill streak. Another good game comes. Go on a 12 kill awesomeness. What do I get. I get killed. Yes you get killed. Your own killstreak automatically murders you. And you get a sniper in a helicopter. So you have to drive a helicopter while sniping people who take about 3 shots to kill with a sniper. The dog riley is awesome though because if your character starts with 100 health Riley starts with aboout 800 health or so,
    So forget the killstreaks. Lets get into how the guns shoot work animate whatever. They do not sound like guns. For someone who goes hunting on a regular basis and has used fully automatic weapons these damn things are ridiculous. They sound like potato shooters. Camos are ridiculous. Cats in space camos and rubber duckies.
    Character movement is pretty fluid though and the slide is pretty awesome if you can master it. You can shoot while sliding which kinda makes you feel like Rambo mixed with an old Arnold Scharshanegger movie. Jumping over objects and sprinting is pretty smooth as well.

    So what you have in a single match is guys running around with a knife and indestructible armor, wolves on the battlefield, rubber ducky camos, and snipers in helicopters. Followed up by people sliding and shooting potato shooters.
    I gave it a 1 because of character movement.
    This game reminds me a lot of another game, Team fortress 2. But i am sure that they were not aiming for that when they made this game so that is why i gave it such a low score.

    TL;DR
    THIS GAME IS ABSOLUTELY HORRENDOUS    … Expand
  29. careface11
    Apr 28, 2014
    0
    The last great call of duty was cod 4, we had dedicated servers and activision cared about the PC community. MW2, MW3, and COD ghosts all came to release with the creators "promising" dedicated servers, which never came. The bulk of PC gamers who buy this game buy it for the multiplayer, but after all these empty promises, we PC gamers are starting to see the trend. I will not be buyingThe last great call of duty was cod 4, we had dedicated servers and activision cared about the PC community. MW2, MW3, and COD ghosts all came to release with the creators "promising" dedicated servers, which never came. The bulk of PC gamers who buy this game buy it for the multiplayer, but after all these empty promises, we PC gamers are starting to see the trend. I will not be buying another COD game either from treyarch or activision.… Expand
  30. ramonce09
    Apr 30, 2014
    1
    This game wasn't like the previous game. They removed the single player load-out changer from Black Ops 2. Also, the story was a wreck, I can't understand how the Federation got to the space without no one noticing them. Also, many best features from the older games had been removed by Ghosts. They also stole some names from Ghost Recon. I just hate when developers lie when they say to theThis game wasn't like the previous game. They removed the single player load-out changer from Black Ops 2. Also, the story was a wreck, I can't understand how the Federation got to the space without no one noticing them. Also, many best features from the older games had been removed by Ghosts. They also stole some names from Ghost Recon. I just hate when developers lie when they say to the people, "We will add bla bla." Don't buy this game.… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

9
#9 Most Discussed PC Game of 2013
53
#53 Most Shared PC Game of 2013

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
68

Mixed or average reviews - based on 14 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 14
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 14
  3. Negative: 2 out of 14
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 30, 2013
    80
    It's exactly what fans of the franchise have grown to expect. No surprises here, folks. [Jan 2014, p.90]
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Nov 25, 2013
    60
    Nothing to see here in terms of innovation: the campaign is dull, the multiplayer fun. But this time, the air of sameness is a little bit too much. [Issue#236]
  3. IncGamers
    Nov 24, 2013
    40
    An utterly horrible PC port mars an otherwise very, very average Call of Duty game. Nothing to see here.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »