Call of Duty: Ghosts

 PC
User Score
2.3

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3604 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 474 out of 3604
  2. Mixed: 384 out of 3604
  3. Negative: 2,746 out of 3604
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Lucif3r
    Nov 26, 2013
    0
    6GB? Crackes proved you can run it with 2 GB. What was this about? Having some contracts with computer brands? I had a change to try it. Abomination to say the lease... Direct xbox port to pc. Plug an Xbox controller into pc you get aim assist. It even pupped default xbox keys on the screen. Just shows how the developers just dont care about PC gamers. Who ironically helped them to the6GB? Crackes proved you can run it with 2 GB. What was this about? Having some contracts with computer brands? I had a change to try it. Abomination to say the lease... Direct xbox port to pc. Plug an Xbox controller into pc you get aim assist. It even pupped default xbox keys on the screen. Just shows how the developers just dont care about PC gamers. Who ironically helped them to the feet in the first place. Dont waste your money. If its not the framerate issues, the cheaters are. Also IGN ratings are a joke.… Expand
  2. IcarusV
    Nov 26, 2013
    10
    Never been a fan of the series but call of duty ghost changed my mind. It was my first COD game, now I wanna try them all out! Love the single player! Extinction mode is really fun!
  3. Manjul
    Nov 26, 2013
    1
    this game is just got failed
    graphics, gameplay ,requirements
    all are poor

    modern warfare series is the best from call of duty's
    if they make modern warfaree 4 it will be best
  4. necrom33
    Nov 25, 2013
    1
    Mediocre graphics, stupid plot, short campaign. I am having a hard time thinking of the POSITIVE things to say about this game. Infinity Ward should be removed as the developer of the next CoD game. Because there WILL be a next CoD game. At this point, for this franchise, money matters more than quality. And Ghosts seems to have made a of it.

    Too often the missions in the single    Mediocre graphics, stupid plot, short campaign. I am having a hard time thinking of the POSITIVE things to say about this game. Infinity Ward should be removed as the developer of the next CoD game. Because there WILL be a next CoD game. At this point, for this franchise, money matters more than quality. And Ghosts seems to have made a of it.

    Too often the missions in the single player started with "shhhh... or something to that effect. The problem is that I did not purchase a stealth game. There are much better stealth franchises out there, if that is what I wanted to play. When we are inevitably discovered, it became a by-the-numbers run to the exit, or hatch, or helicopter, or tank... whichever.

    And by the way: these have to be the loudest 'ghosts' ever.

    Riley the gimmick (sorry, the dog) is an afterthought for the most part. As a matter of fact, there seem to be only two characters that you develop any kind of emotional response to and they are not Riley or the brothers.

    In an era that is producing games like Grand Theft Auto 5, Bioshock Infinite and FarCry 3, just to name a few, it IS possible to produce quality and sales in sequels. Activision seems to have given up on quality for this franchise if the evidence is the last two games they have thrown out: Black Ops II and Ghosts. Both are a case of slapping some explosions together, throwing in some Multiplayer maps and putting 'Call of Duty in front of whatever is this game's name and out the door it goes. Then they sit by the register and wait for us, the stupid people, to dish out the money for it. We do it, even though sometimes we are questioning if this one is going to be any good.

    The only reason I still play is because of the people I play with, but it may now be time to catch up on games I missed previously like Batman Origins or Splinter Cell Blacklist.

    If you work hard for your money, save some of it and pass on this turkey. Or, at the very least, wait for the first price drop. At the rate people are leaving the Multiplayer, you will not have to wait long.    … Expand
  5. ARpope
    Nov 25, 2013
    0
    Console game do not buy for pc. Reasons 1. Lag 2. frame glitching 3. fps drop 4.Hackers galore 5. No dedicated servers 6. Random crashes 7. Can not adjust audio only volume up or down 8. Join a lobby that is boosted from hackers you have no idea then get banned 9. only 3 game modes on multiplayer hardcore playlist 10. Graphics look like mw2. I feel thats enough dont believe my reviewConsole game do not buy for pc. Reasons 1. Lag 2. frame glitching 3. fps drop 4.Hackers galore 5. No dedicated servers 6. Random crashes 7. Can not adjust audio only volume up or down 8. Join a lobby that is boosted from hackers you have no idea then get banned 9. only 3 game modes on multiplayer hardcore playlist 10. Graphics look like mw2. I feel thats enough dont believe my review visit call of duty official web site and go to pc forums see for yourself.… Expand
  6. da1kk
    Nov 25, 2013
    0
    PL: Stanowczo odradzam. Gra nie jest warta złotówki i nie kupujcie jej nawet w największej promocji jaką znajdziecie.

    Rating this piece of crap 0, because I have it and I can't play it. IW turbo next gen development made it unplayable. There's no optimisation. Despite lowing option by option graphics I ended in 60fps right about in Wolfenstein 3D. IW leave CoD to Treyarch. All the perks    PL: Stanowczo odradzam. Gra nie jest warta złotówki i nie kupujcie jej nawet w największej promocji jaką znajdziecie.

    Rating this piece of crap 0, because I have it and I can't play it. IW turbo next gen development made it unplayable. There's no optimisation. Despite lowing option by option graphics I ended in 60fps right about in Wolfenstein 3D. IW leave CoD to Treyarch. All the perks and setting mechanics is soo crapy compared to BO2. Maps are like Gotham City Impostors. Textures looks like bad tonemapped pseudo-hdr. And of course 65GB of disk space... CoD Ghosts is one of the biggest failures I've seen in years. There are indie studios, which would create soo much better game than "pros" from your studios. Time to beat the hell from your keyboards, kick everybody from Quality, ban every tester because they clearly have no idea how gamers want to spend free time.    … Expand
  7. Gullyvuhr
    Nov 25, 2013
    6
    The problem with COD:Ghosts isn't just the game itself, which is problematic to say the least. The game is a stability plagued port, obviously meant for console fans, that should leave a bad taste in the mouth of loyal PC fans that raised the game to it's current genre-defining status.

    All the controls and mechanics are there from previous versions of COD, but if you select any single    The problem with COD:Ghosts isn't just the game itself, which is problematic to say the least. The game is a stability plagued port, obviously meant for console fans, that should leave a bad taste in the mouth of loyal PC fans that raised the game to it's current genre-defining status.

    All the controls and mechanics are there from previous versions of COD, but if you select any single mechanic I can list for you the COD game like that did it better and IW shows with Ghosts to have severely lost a step in the Multi-player experience (which, let's be honest, Treyarch has historically done better).

    This all being said I'll leave you with a final question: Is COD: Ghosts a bad game? Well, no. Not exactly. Get the stability issues resolved and it will be fine, which sums it up on the whole. Fine, and uninspired. Hardcore COD fans will feel a bit disappointed, and new COD players will not be as impressed like those of us who played COD:MW were.    … Expand
  8. fearmear
    Nov 25, 2013
    7
    After Update 2 all issues I had with this game were resolved and I could finally complete it. And now I actually liked it. 5 hours of non-stop action. Really good Call of Duty game. 9 of 10.

    Textures still look ugly. 8 of 10.
    6GB ram in requirements. 7 of 10.
  9. lostmenoggin
    Nov 24, 2013
    0
    It's called Ghosts because CoD is dead now. I was so looking forward to this game but I should have just assumed that it was going to be the same old rehashed graphics and gameplay. Not to mention that PC gamers are starting to get the short end of the stick with developers not optimizing things for PC and just putting out a half ass port like they can't be bothered to make anything goodIt's called Ghosts because CoD is dead now. I was so looking forward to this game but I should have just assumed that it was going to be the same old rehashed graphics and gameplay. Not to mention that PC gamers are starting to get the short end of the stick with developers not optimizing things for PC and just putting out a half ass port like they can't be bothered to make anything good because ermagerd consoles.

    PC games should be ported TO consoles. We are also getting screwed by CoD having 2 different companies release a different title every other year. The part that bothers me though is each company also has TWO YEARS to come up with a new game and that neither company has the balls to step up the game and come up with something DOPE that leaves the other company crying with it's ding dong tucked between its legs. More like Call of Doody. This CoD game is an utter disappointment, as usual.    … Expand
  10. Archie101
    Nov 24, 2013
    10
    This is a great game. The campaign is simply amazing and the multiplayer is great. I love the extinction mode as well. The story is good. The graphics are good. The A.I. is good. What else do you want people
  11. Jaydyce
    Nov 24, 2013
    0
    I literally signed up for an account here so I can tell you to NEVER BUY COD again. This game is trash, it is pure recycled trash. If you like hackers...this is your place....every room has a hacker in it. This game is utter crap and has homodogs....
  12. woodanoob
    Nov 24, 2013
    0
    I can't believe i bought this game. Not worth the money. This is my first and last COD game.
    The graphic is quite bad, can't believe it is like 30GB (Next Gen WTF).
  13. The_true_critic
    Nov 24, 2013
    2
    Here it goes. Call of Duty: Ghosts, maybe good, maybe bad, is it a remake or a ressurect. Well my critic is final and on my honest opinion this is one of the worst remakes I've ever seen. Past-gen graphics, horrible gameplay, nothing new compared to the versions before, it's just painfully repeated. I'm only giving a 2 because the development team worked hard copying the 3d models. I'mHere it goes. Call of Duty: Ghosts, maybe good, maybe bad, is it a remake or a ressurect. Well my critic is final and on my honest opinion this is one of the worst remakes I've ever seen. Past-gen graphics, horrible gameplay, nothing new compared to the versions before, it's just painfully repeated. I'm only giving a 2 because the development team worked hard copying the 3d models. I'm not going to buy your game until the 9 years old go away, the story becomes interesting, and the game becomes cheaper.… Expand
  14. VOP2288
    Nov 23, 2013
    5
    In my opinion the one thing that kept me coming back to the Call of Duty series for the last couple years was that it was at least enjoyable. Despite being of the opinion that MW2 and MW3 are virtually the same game, Black Ops 2 made a HUGE mistake by going futuristic, and feeling a little like an idiot for buying into the whole annual release thing I still found each game fun to playIn my opinion the one thing that kept me coming back to the Call of Duty series for the last couple years was that it was at least enjoyable. Despite being of the opinion that MW2 and MW3 are virtually the same game, Black Ops 2 made a HUGE mistake by going futuristic, and feeling a little like an idiot for buying into the whole annual release thing I still found each game fun to play through (both online and in the campaign) and worth the expense.

    Sadly this is not the case with Ghosts.

    Call of Duty campaigns haven't been interesting or even somewhat well made since they left the World War Two setting (aside from Black Ops which I completely ADORED) but Ghosts falls much harder than even the masturbatory Michael Bay inspired 'oorah! 'MERICA!!!!" forays of the Modern Warfare series.

    Even though the levels are varied and choke full of action none of them particularly stand out, the story-line (though somewhat interesting) fails to establish any of kind of emotional connection between player and characters/events, and in general even though the plot isn't directly taken from another source it just feels like something we've seen countless times before in movies and other video games. Simply put, the campaign is uninspired, repetitive, boring, and worst of all really makes you feel like you're going through the motions for the sake of taking full advantage of that $60. In other words, it truly feels like this time around the developer went into it with the mindset that no one was going to care about the singleplayer and this total lack of interest is on display.

    In regards to the multiplayer, the absolute lifeblood of this franchise since 2007 the only aspect of this series that has convinced gamers and critics that silly, over the top, and short campaigns was alright....it's a total mess.

    The PC's versions existing technical issues are magnified when trying to fight through an online game where speed, reflexes, and precision are key. Personally I've had to turn down the graphics settings nearly as low as it will go in order to get decent performance thus making the game look like garbage which in turn isn't enjoyable in itself but also makes it really hard to distinguish opposing players from the environment more than a couple yards away. The issues with fairly consistent lag only multiplies these frustrations and makes playing the game for more than a couple rounds an absolute chore.

    Performance problems aside, the online aspect just doesn't feel as fun and addictive as it did in previous installments. While having different character models that you can customize (to a limit) is pretty great the killstreak reward feature feels neutered, the unlock system is unnecessarily convoluted, spawn locations on maps are terribly done, and the maps themselves are a mixed bag with maybe one or two enjoyable ones while the rest vary from kind of bad to terrible.

    The icing on this mediocre cake though is something that I almost can't believe they let happen. While people like to joke around that competitive online players jump on the "you're hacking!" thing too much, it appears as though Infinity Ward did very little to protect the online portion of the game from being abused by those using aimbots, wallhacks, and other such nonsense. Whereas Black Ops 2 had a pretty good anti-cheating system there doesn't even appear to be one for Ghosts. The result? There's plenty of people using these hacks out there and they're doing so virtually unrestricted by the game. This is a major issue and it needs to be resolved as quickly as possible.

    In short, Ghosts completely fails to achieve what it set out to do: i.e. be this new console generation's "Modern Warfare". Both its singleplayer and multiplayer are underwhelming and pack plenty of issues to boot and the consequence of this seems to be that more and more Call of Duty fans are waking up and realizing how stagnated and repetitive the franchise has gotten over the last six years.

    Call of Duty's fall had to come sometime and Ghosts may in fact be the harbinger either for the slow death of the series and/or the shift of support/acclaim from Infinity Ward to Treyarch.    … Expand
  15. Watz
    Nov 23, 2013
    0
    what did they think what they are doing?
    Each current game runs on my computer and looks good.
    CoD Ghosts is jerky and still looks blurry.
    It has 30 GB of hard disk space and supplies a poor graphic.
    The MP is nice by the facilities here, but far too ugly.
    So an expensive game and so little value.
    Shame on You
  16. STDVirus
    Nov 23, 2013
    8
    Bought the game with very high expectations as a fan of Call of Duty: BO2. Took about a week or two for them to work most of the bugs out of the PC versions with bad frame rates, crashes and just getting the game to boot on a lot of PC's was work. Now that it's all cleaned up and most of the bugs are gone its a great game still think BO2 plays a little better but love the kill streaks inBought the game with very high expectations as a fan of Call of Duty: BO2. Took about a week or two for them to work most of the bugs out of the PC versions with bad frame rates, crashes and just getting the game to boot on a lot of PC's was work. Now that it's all cleaned up and most of the bugs are gone its a great game still think BO2 plays a little better but love the kill streaks in Ghost. A good game and its not to be compared to Battlefield 4, they are totally different styles of games this is more arcade fast pace style where BF4 is simulator and more realistic. Over all COD Ghost is a great game and you will have loads of fun playing it takes a while to get used to the play style but once you do.....Let the games begin.… Expand
  17. tOpGaver
    Nov 23, 2013
    0
    This game sucks at this state. Its a very bad port of the xbox360 version. And laggy like s...
    Where are the dedicated servers!?
    I want my money back!
  18. GamerNumberOne
    Nov 23, 2013
    0
    The game is total crap! I loved the features in BO2 like the Cinema etc. And also the Gameplay in older Call of Duty's was MUCH better! And now...it's just a step back. But not one small, but more a huge step back! Bad Graphics, Bad Gameplay, and lame single-player.
  19. YaukYauk1
    Nov 23, 2013
    10
    10 out of 10. Ignore those COD haters, they are just kids who can't stand being owned in Multiplayer mode. Lets talk about the Single Player first. The story has a great freaking plot and ends with a cliff hanger which makes me wanna play more. I'm guessing there will be a Ghost 2 but lets talk about Multiplayer now. People don't play COD Ghost anymore because of the mouse problem or the10 out of 10. Ignore those COD haters, they are just kids who can't stand being owned in Multiplayer mode. Lets talk about the Single Player first. The story has a great freaking plot and ends with a cliff hanger which makes me wanna play more. I'm guessing there will be a Ghost 2 but lets talk about Multiplayer now. People don't play COD Ghost anymore because of the mouse problem or the low fps, but who the f**k cares? Just play. There are so many ways to fix it, play in windowed mode and disable steam in-game. Helps so much, these people are just lazy and I bet they just lost their last round badly before they came on Metacritic.… Expand
  20. mone06
    Nov 23, 2013
    0
    I loved COD4 MW2 and the Black Ops series. But this, this is completely unexpected. I'm just gonna sum it up like this. If you so desperately want to play this game PIRATE it!! Complete waste of money. You want an online shooter play BF4. No im not a fan boy, BF4 is just the better game regardless of what IGN says
  21. sandrom
    Nov 23, 2013
    0
    this one is a step or more back in anything. completely messed up game in any regard. single player was shortly some fun because of some fun graphics scenes, but most of the time it was freaking boring. multiplayer dont wanna talk about it, others pointed it out nicely how wtf it is. last cod i have ever bought.
    i forgot something: i play on a 27" with 2560 and it looks like 90s 800x600    this one is a step or more back in anything. completely messed up game in any regard. single player was shortly some fun because of some fun graphics scenes, but most of the time it was freaking boring. multiplayer dont wanna talk about it, others pointed it out nicely how wtf it is. last cod i have ever bought.
    i forgot something: i play on a 27" with 2560 and it looks like 90s 800x600 somehow. what the that is more than annoying.    … Expand
  22. NavyAlphaGamer
    Nov 23, 2013
    2
    God awful PC port. Multi-player is nothing new. Single-player is the same OVER-THE-TOP story. If the this is Call of Duty's ''Next Gen'' game, then Battlefield has nothing to worry about. Don't waste your time with this game, especially the PC version.
  23. BunnyMan
    Nov 23, 2013
    0
    I've been playing CoD since W@W, and this is pretty much the same run-n-gun arcade shooter throughout their franchise. Now I mainly play for multiplayer, and can say it's the same old stuff, nothing wrong with that.
    There is point perk system, as used in Treyarch's BO2, so if you're not a fan of that, then that might be a negative for you. Though, the same old 1 host advantage lobbies are    I've been playing CoD since W@W, and this is pretty much the same run-n-gun arcade shooter throughout their franchise. Now I mainly play for multiplayer, and can say it's the same old stuff, nothing wrong with that.
    There is point perk system, as used in Treyarch's BO2, so if you're not a fan of that, then that might be a negative for you. Though, the same old 1 host advantage lobbies are being used once again, which can and will lead to laggy games, due to being forced to play against people probably not even close to your area.
    Graphics look nice, only if you max out all the settings. There's no in-game option to change field of view, there are mods available but there is uncertainty at the moment whether they are allowed without punishment/ban. All you get for audio options is a level bar to increase or decrease volume. Unlike BO1 & BO2 where you have different audio presets, and can even lower down the volume of annoying voice overs and music.
    As I said, this is the same gameplay as the previous games, whether they were IW or Treyarch, and I still have fun with that. So why such a low score? Well, I suppose this might not be IW fault completely, but there is weak PC community for this game. On average, there are 8K players online, sometimes 18K, and 30K on a rare sunny day. I honestly don't know if those are average numbers for a call of duty game on PC, being that it is my first one on PC. Without dedicated servers, and the previous 6GB RAM requirement (now patched to 4GB), people probably decided to pass on this or just decided to move on to consoles (which average +400K players online), sadly. Cannot recommend at the moment, if ever, I would suggest wait till steam itself has a free to play weekend, maybe by then there will be more players.    … Expand
  24. Mike-Messiah
    Nov 23, 2013
    3
    When there is at least 5 point difference between overall User score and "professional" Game reviewer score, it shows how far the gaming industry has bought out the media.
    Coming back to the game, i didnt buy it, i torrented it out, took me 3 days to download this ovorsized over my piss poor braodband, finished the game in 9 hours and i feel the last 3-4 days was a waste. I didnt pay a    When there is at least 5 point difference between overall User score and "professional" Game reviewer score, it shows how far the gaming industry has bought out the media.
    Coming back to the game, i didnt buy it, i torrented it out, took me 3 days to download this ovorsized over my piss poor braodband, finished the game in 9 hours and i feel the last 3-4 days was a waste. I didnt pay a penny for this game yet i feel cheated, thats the extent of the let down feeling it gave me.

    Stop encouraging devs from looting our money with pathetic products, stop buying bad games, seriously...    … Expand
  25. darkokills
    Nov 22, 2013
    1
    2600k...GTX 680 4Gb FTW...8 gigs ram...Samsung 840 pro.. What am I missing here? Does it run like s*** on purpose? Go play MW2 and see BETTER graphics AND gameplay. What a joke...What a bad, bad, bad joke this was. Not next gen in the slightest, runs like a$$, and I still can't find a reason why????
  26. Conejin
    Nov 22, 2013
    4
    Is this the best COD to date?

    ->If we speak about the new ones (MW2 and above) then yes. I would prefer to play this rater than MW3. ->If we speak about the old ones (Classic COD 1 and so on) then no. You know whats wrong with this game? The same that has been happening with all the recent COD Games. It stills...looks...like an update. Take for example Team Fortress 2, its a    Is this the best COD to date?

    ->If we speak about the new ones (MW2 and above) then yes. I would prefer to play this rater than MW3.
    ->If we speak about the old ones (Classic COD 1 and so on) then no.

    You know whats wrong with this game? The same that has been happening with all the recent COD Games. It stills...looks...like an update.

    Take for example Team Fortress 2, its a video game that has been changed thousand of times with major and minor updates, and even DLCS, all FOR FREE. (Ex: Mann vs machine)

    Cod instead, gives you 10 maps, and then you have to pay 19$ for 5 more.

    Talking about Cod Ghosts: It looks like a major update to Black Ops 2. Seriously. The plain singleplayer plot is just stupid as hell. South Americans attack USA, because.... because... they became some kind of Nazis who want to establish their superiority? Ok sure... I think the COD developers have run out of enemys (They already used nazis, communists, brasilians, arabs, nazi-communists, europeans, nazi-communist-arabs, etc etc.)
    Talking about the multiplayer, this is the formula:

    Spawn Kill Killstreak Die Kill Die Kill Killstreak [Repeat every match]

    About the new "Engine" that this game supposedly had: Fake as is the same engine used in the last MW-BO games-    … Expand
  27. PlayStation4
    Nov 22, 2013
    10
    better than any call of duty it has amazing graphics and even better graphics in the next gen systems and PC the multiplayer looks cool also the squad mode is good too very good multiplayer just need some work with the spawns but extinction is the coolest part of this CoD ALIENS excellet job.
  28. XOmegaZeroX
    Nov 22, 2013
    0
    well, what i can say?
    theholychilli, you want to play the game that have the same things every time?
    the engine of this game is the same of MW3, but modified. this game requires 6GB RAM(with the new patch now requires 4) and the other requisites are exaggerated. the singleplayer is short, dont have the things that have in the old CoDs. the multiplayer is horrible, the maps are    well, what i can say?
    theholychilli, you want to play the game that have the same things every time?
    the engine of this game is the same of MW3, but modified.
    this game requires 6GB RAM(with the new patch now requires 4) and the other requisites are exaggerated.
    the singleplayer is short, dont have the things that have in the old CoDs.
    the multiplayer is horrible, the maps are exaggeratedly large, the only thing that is fun is to run like a boss killing the others players.
    the graphics are outdated, are not the next generation.    … Expand
  29. nerwus
    Nov 22, 2013
    0
    Serious warning Don't buy You will regret it like I am Game is totally unplayable I wish I could return it and spend money on hmmm.... anything else
  30. LMSPECTRO
    Nov 22, 2013
    0
    COD: GHOSTS, the game is very confusing in multiplayer, leaves much to be desired because it breaks a lot to share with those giant maps, 6 vs. 6 is not a good option for these maps, this makes the player experience the horrible, not to mention the lack of compliance with the Brazilians who bought the game on PC and did not have voice acting, infinity ward and activision this game even.COD: GHOSTS, the game is very confusing in multiplayer, leaves much to be desired because it breaks a lot to share with those giant maps, 6 vs. 6 is not a good option for these maps, this makes the player experience the horrible, not to mention the lack of compliance with the Brazilians who bought the game on PC and did not have voice acting, infinity ward and activision this game even.
      Not to mention I did not say the crazy respawn game that makes you sometimes born and die, to be born in the wrong places, the campaign mode is fairly weak, easily the most in the console and pc version, this game showed that deserves attention not players, if you never played cod before stay away from ghosts, throw the past but did not get the ghosts at all.    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

9
#9 Most Discussed PC Game of 2013
53
#53 Most Shared PC Game of 2013

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
68

Mixed or average reviews - based on 14 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 14
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 14
  3. Negative: 2 out of 14
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 30, 2013
    80
    It's exactly what fans of the franchise have grown to expect. No surprises here, folks. [Jan 2014, p.90]
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Nov 25, 2013
    60
    Nothing to see here in terms of innovation: the campaign is dull, the multiplayer fun. But this time, the air of sameness is a little bit too much. [Issue#236]
  3. IncGamers
    Nov 24, 2013
    40
    An utterly horrible PC port mars an otherwise very, very average Call of Duty game. Nothing to see here.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »