Call of Duty: Black Ops III

 PC
User Score
3.7

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 1426 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 324 out of 1426
  2. Mixed: 256 out of 1426
  3. Negative: 846 out of 1426
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. lasn
    Mar 4, 2016
    8
    The game had a bad launch, but it was fixed pretty fast (for me atleast). I think that is the reason for the low user score. 2.7 out of 10 is absolutely too low. Game is alot of fun.

    My first COD game. I have over 150 hours played now. Well worth the money.
  2. empleat
    Feb 28, 2016
    0
    This game is mirror picture of advanced warfare, there is nothing new, perhaps swimming :D
    People don't play any other modes, than tdm, or free for all, so you get bored fast.
    Also there is very big input lag and game is terrible optimized.
    Save your money, don't give free money developers, which are spamming same **** over and over.
  3. screff
    Feb 26, 2016
    0
    Another year, another crappy Call of Duty console port. It's pretty sad how far this game has strayed from it's origin on the PC platform. At the very least it's really begging for a new graphics engine at this point but they won't invest any of the billions they've made into making an enjoyable game. They're really milking the franchise completely dry by rehashing the same drivel eachAnother year, another crappy Call of Duty console port. It's pretty sad how far this game has strayed from it's origin on the PC platform. At the very least it's really begging for a new graphics engine at this point but they won't invest any of the billions they've made into making an enjoyable game. They're really milking the franchise completely dry by rehashing the same drivel each year. Their formula to deprive hordes of prepubescent boys of their allowance money is still somehow working. Sadly it continues dragging on ad nauseum. I really hope Activision puts it out of it's own misery soon.… Expand
  4. Garibaldi
    Feb 26, 2016
    1
    Played the game for 30 minutes and then another 30 minutes really tried but i couldn't play it anymore, looks like old game, bad port, i really have nothing more to say that a majority of people here have already told, not a hater was a fan of series long time ago but now ....... whatever.
  5. gipsylon
    Feb 22, 2016
    2
    The lag compensation is always against me, seems impossible to kill anyone most of the time unless catching them off guard. I had major lag compensation problems since MW3 and it was never fixed, just little less noticable in BO2 and AW. Usually after playing few games in a row it was becoming decent, but in case of BO3 it's always bad and worst of all COD games.

    All maps feel bland and    The lag compensation is always against me, seems impossible to kill anyone most of the time unless catching them off guard. I had major lag compensation problems since MW3 and it was never fixed, just little less noticable in BO2 and AW. Usually after playing few games in a row it was becoming decent, but in case of BO3 it's always bad and worst of all COD games.

    All maps feel bland and very small (no use for LMG or sniper rifles). Graphics aren't that great, yet I had to disable or lower many settings to run game smooth.

    Also don't like the fact all weapons are imitations/hybrids of real ones with stupid names. I guess Activision don't want to pay royalties to weapon manufacturers anymore.    … Expand
  6. Jacsam
    Feb 18, 2016
    8
    I do not like multiplayer. I bought the game for the single player experience. I thought the graphics and game play were very good. It also had some interesting weapons. I do not think a game has to reinvent itself every time it comes out. This game is a solid FPS and if you like call of duty then you will enjoy this game.
  7. Mahdiar
    Feb 18, 2016
    7
    Gameplay : 7
    Graphics : 7
    Story : 8
    Sound : 8
    **********************************************************************************
    Overall : 7
  8. Archi-max
    Feb 12, 2016
    0
    Worst COD ever! where's the epic story? awful control, awful graphics, it feels like i'm playing ultimate spiderman! are you kidding me? this is not what we expected after COD Ghost and COD Advanced Warefare.... Seriously? why all developers intend to fail after huge success? to end this review i'd like to say that COD Black Ops 3 is like a bad marriage between counter strike and Borderlands
  9. fr600
    Feb 10, 2016
    0
    This is one of the worst call of duty ever. I don't understand how the critics rate it 8/10? The franchise is going backward, gone are the days when $1b sales were expected. Now the company probably doesn't even make $100m, thus sales figures are not public anymore. It's sad how the game is going down the drain.
  10. SotD
    Feb 9, 2016
    0
    этот кусок говна игрой назвать очень сложно.7.3 балла?за что?мультиплеер на работает вернее он работает он онлагает так что играть вообще невозможно.юольше я это дерьмо покупать не буду и никому не советую.колда сдохла туда ей и дорога)))этот кусок говна игрой назвать очень сложно.7.3 балла?за что?мультиплеер на работает вернее он работает он онлагает так что играть вообще невозможно.юольше я это дерьмо покупать не буду и никому не советую.колда сдохла туда ей и дорога)))
  11. Kmodo
    Feb 9, 2016
    10
    Black Ops are the only CoD's we play these days due to being the only one with dedicated servers and graphics options you just come to expect on PC e.g. 120fov and not 65fov on MW3 lol.

    Hundreds of hours in previous Black Ops and currently 110hours BO3 so far which is pretty decent for a very casual gamer these days :D It's just a fun game to play, whether have 30mins free over hours    Black Ops are the only CoD's we play these days due to being the only one with dedicated servers and graphics options you just come to expect on PC e.g. 120fov and not 65fov on MW3 lol.

    Hundreds of hours in previous Black Ops and currently 110hours BO3 so far which is pretty decent for a very casual gamer these days :D

    It's just a fun game to play, whether have 30mins free over hours and even though we buy most new games (star wars, r6s etc) this will stay our go to game till the next Black Ops ;D    … Expand
  12. Toothlessninja
    Feb 5, 2016
    6
    As you can see from the user score, a lot of people don't seem to like this game. Mostly due to the bad PC port (which they have since fixed) and the graphics (they wanted to create a game that could run on 2gb cards so everyone could play). I'm here to tell you that the game isn't that bad. It's not a game I'd call "legendary" by any means, but it's not another Ride to Hell: RetributionAs you can see from the user score, a lot of people don't seem to like this game. Mostly due to the bad PC port (which they have since fixed) and the graphics (they wanted to create a game that could run on 2gb cards so everyone could play). I'm here to tell you that the game isn't that bad. It's not a game I'd call "legendary" by any means, but it's not another Ride to Hell: Retribution like everyone is calling it.

    -Graphics and port job-
    I will admit, at release, this game ran like a slideshow on high end pc's. Now after NUMEROUS patches, the game runs flawlessly. I always ran above 60+ fps maxed out 1080p on a lower end pc (AMD FX-6300 and Radeon 7970). They clearly took the time to fix their mistakes and create a good running game now.

    -Story-
    The story is... ok at best. It's another one of those "robots kill humans" and "terrorist" plots that you see every other game. It's not really worth the play if you want to play campaign. It's clear that the focus was on the other gamemodes and NOT the story.
    One thing that I do like is the fact that it is multiplayer. If you want, you can go through the whole campaign with your friends. It'll get a few laughs out of you and your friends playing, even if it is cheesy.

    -Zombies-
    One. Map. ONE. MAP. Seriously, GimmieMoneyArch? Yup. There's only one map. Unless you buy the $50 season pass to fuel their Lamborghinis as they swim in money, you only get one map. The season pass isn't even that good right now, it just comes with The Giant from World at War with some updated graphics. Lazy.
    They did make a lot of changes to the gamemode though. It's a lot for someone who just touched zombies previously to have all of this information shoved in their face at once. It's quite a bit to absorb. Nonetheless, it's fun and got a few hours out of me, but it's nothing to throw $60 at for.

    -Nightmare mode-
    This was a lazy attempt for people to play the campaign again, but with zombies thrown in. They don't even change the cutscenes! They just mute the audio from them and slap a narration bit up! It's so lazy to see that they did this. When the game said "zombie campaign", I expected a whole campaign about zombies taking over the world and complex character development (like The Walking Dead or other zombie stories), but I got WAY to ahead of myself. It's also boring and repetitive to just kill nothing but the same zombie over levels you already played.

    -Multiplayer-
    This was where the game shines. The shining crown. I put over 200+ hours into this game after about a month of playing. It's a TON of fun and probably the only reason I bought this game.
    There are now classes or "specialists" as the game calls them, that now diversify play a bit. Each specialist can choose 2 abilities to use that can give them either a weapon or a small advantage for a short period. The classes don't have any personality though. All of them are serious and not funny. Nothing like Team Fortress 2, where each class had a different fun personality. It would've been nice to give the characters some kind of personality besides "Nomad, KIA" and "Ruin, KIA". They had so much potential to put tons of funny character quotes or quips that would've made me remember the characters apart from what they occasionally do every 2 minutes.
    As for balance of weapons, they need to fix them. Some of the weapons are straight up overpowered. The P-06, Sheiva, pretty much all smgs, Haymaker, and the Brecci, just to name a few.
    There are only 12 maps (not including the Nuketown for pre-orders only). Most of them are good and have a lot of ramps and walls for jetpacks. Also, I noticed a lot less camping by allowing almost every part of the map to have 2 entrances to eliminate camping. Sure there were still campers, but rarely any.
    Speaking of the jetpack, it's a really nice feature I'm glad they carried over from Advanced Warfare. I didn't play AW, but from what I've seen and heard from others, it was nice to have a lot more mobility so combat is a lot more diverse.

    -Final verdict-
    I kept playing. I don't know why, but despite all of these flaws, I kept playing. I put over 200+ hours in alone and that for me is enough to justify a $60 purchase.    … Expand
  13. Thatoneotaku
    Feb 3, 2016
    0
    Same **** every year, they need to stop making these crappy, unfinished, glitchy, boring games.
    I am TIRED of cod. What is this? They just slapped black ops 3 on advanced warfare 2 so people would buy it. they are money-hungry whores. There is NO innovation, juts nothing whatsoever.
  14. GaryGeneral
    Jan 27, 2016
    10
    Having spent thousands of hours of my life on Multiplayer in various Call of Duty games (and other shooters, sadly), I feel I'm qualified to rate this game. Second best Call of Duty ever- Black ops 1 was top, this is next. The vertical nature is under control (unlike Advanced warfare), the guns are great, maps small and intense. What else could you want? Except more people playing on PC toHaving spent thousands of hours of my life on Multiplayer in various Call of Duty games (and other shooters, sadly), I feel I'm qualified to rate this game. Second best Call of Duty ever- Black ops 1 was top, this is next. The vertical nature is under control (unlike Advanced warfare), the guns are great, maps small and intense. What else could you want? Except more people playing on PC to get more games running (eg no one ever plays gun game???) Dedicated servers and competitive mod will cement this as a serious alternative to CS:GO… Expand
  15. mrmatthew
    Jan 21, 2016
    7
    I thought this was a fun game until I kept dying. It is a little too hard I think! The controls and the stamina you have is not enough. If they only had more life in the characters it would be a great game!!
  16. Sir_Swag117
    Jan 19, 2016
    1
    Another three femtoseconds, another COD game that lags to absolute **** framerate tanking worse than KSP. There is one massively awesome thing about it! It is BETTER than CODAW, which was CODAWful and ****
  17. Lokidos
    Jan 18, 2016
    0
    0 just because it is another call of duty.And I have to type like 150 characters...So oh well ill say few things.Zombies? Please again?Always zombies u are zombies...Modern era?Boring id prefer another era with call of duty...Generally I m not into playing the single campaign even anymore.Once I would like to try them but every day I see new COD I got bored.
  18. an24774
    Jan 17, 2016
    1
    This game is the worst ever Call of Duty game. Single player is bad like hell, story is sucks - this modern "super soldiers" - story is very annoying and tiring. Last year the Advanced warfighter, this time this futuristic super soldiers - crysis 3 and killzone combination without any depth. Voice acting crap, graphics outdated, It is bad like hell. I spent 5 hours with it, tried toThis game is the worst ever Call of Duty game. Single player is bad like hell, story is sucks - this modern "super soldiers" - story is very annoying and tiring. Last year the Advanced warfighter, this time this futuristic super soldiers - crysis 3 and killzone combination without any depth. Voice acting crap, graphics outdated, It is bad like hell. I spent 5 hours with it, tried to convince myself that it was going to be better, dont give it up - but could not take more. Unistalled from my PC and will never play again. Nevber!
    I knew it was going to be crap! Luckily did not spend full price (of Eur 60)but only Eur 28 with G2A discounts - but I already regret that I still spent that much money on it. It is not worth more than Eur 5.
    Avoid it!    … Expand
  19. Ghoster
    Jan 3, 2016
    0
    We are all used that COD's get worst every year. I wanted to check if they finally make multiplayer better and got the game only for that. I spend 3 days with support because I was unable to connect servers. Finally they told me they have issues with some virus killers. Really? This is ONLY game ever I had problems connecting. And, yes! After I finally tried it sucked big time. even worseWe are all used that COD's get worst every year. I wanted to check if they finally make multiplayer better and got the game only for that. I spend 3 days with support because I was unable to connect servers. Finally they told me they have issues with some virus killers. Really? This is ONLY game ever I had problems connecting. And, yes! After I finally tried it sucked big time. even worse than usual. :(… Expand
  20. Culveys
    Dec 30, 2015
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This will be a bit of a rant about the multiplayer component of BO3. It is not a review as such but is still all from experience, which I feel will you will encounter should you purchase this game. The multiplayer is probably the worst I have experienced. It's as if they blended Advanced Warfare and Destiny and tried to sell it as COD. The specialist classes are interesting at first, until you realize that everyone plays as the two most powerful ones. Kill-streaks require more kills to acquire and can be shot down almost instantly by rockets. Some specialist skins require kills with their specialty weapon; this wouldn't be so difficult if the multiplayer wasn't abysmally unbalanced. 5 minutes of play-testing would have made it obvious to the developers that the first-unlocked weapons should swap places with the higher-rank weapons. There are about 5-7 of the most powerful weapons that are used by everyone. The addition of wall-running removes the sense of map control entirely, you get shot from every side except the front by some grasshopper with an SMG. Maps are so similar to BO2 I confuse the layout. I question the mental capability of those who defend this game. Do not purchase.… Expand
  21. Bobk
    Dec 26, 2015
    8
    I don't know why people hate this game so much. It is another Call Of Duty tittle so not much has changed but it is still way better that Advanced Warfare and it can't be compared to the absolute disater Ghosts. The game offers a lot of content, from guns to perks to specialists. I would give it a third spot in the franchise ,right after Black Ops 2 and COD 4: MW.
  22. Baronz
    Dec 25, 2015
    3
    This game should be called CoD LSD Trip Ops... Aside from the terrible lags even with a good system, the story is really unepic, the worst CoD i ever played...
  23. s3rgio00
    Dec 25, 2015
    0
    This **** sucked so bad, worst part they took my money. This is why I hate cod, they keep trying to please 13 year olds with garbage.............................
  24. Tornado130
    Dec 19, 2015
    0
    There is skill based matchmaking, that is very bad. Do not buy this game because there is skill based matchmade which means you will have to sweat alot.
  25. ragnarokew
    Dec 15, 2015
    3
    Here we go i dont want to write early review so i wait some for patches and gain some play time

    source:50 hours gameplay. Why very low ratings ? Because game deserves very low ratings there is too much thing to fix and game is expensive.My computer near good-good+ but i barely can take 60fps and too much people have problem with optimization if game not gonna be stable then what's to    Here we go i dont want to write early review so i wait some for patches and gain some play time

    source:50 hours gameplay.

    Why very low ratings ? Because game deserves very low ratings there is too much thing to fix and game is expensive.My computer near good-good+ but i barely can take 60fps and too much people have problem with optimization if game not gonna be stable then what's to point of playing ?

    Very bad campaign don't even play not worth

    Fun Multiplayer new specialist thing adds more fun unless game freeze.Multiplayer is good but they can still fix some things; weapons (smg long distance,shoutgun annoying) ,flamethrower tottaly annoying , too much jumping , not much player etc. etc.

    Zombies: Well this time nice job i really like zombies finnaly good ai , im giving 3 for zombie mod but you have to buy dlc for upcoming maps

    Worth buying ?

    NO    … Expand
  26. endermeister
    Dec 14, 2015
    4
    WTF you can slide up stairs. Fuc* gravity. though overall good grafic a kind of boring campaign but good online gameplay. recomend but still is unreal.
  27. Indrigis
    Dec 13, 2015
    7
    Let me start by saying that the game deserves a solid 5/10 considering the server issues. But assuming they're fixed...

    Multiplayer: Gunplay: It's yet more of Advanced Warfare except now horribly mutilated. The maps are small and full of obstacles deliberately placed to promote close range SMG shootouts over long range shots. Moreover, maps went from 3D to 3Lane, introducing lots of    Let me start by saying that the game deserves a solid 5/10 considering the server issues. But assuming they're fixed...

    Multiplayer:

    Gunplay: It's yet more of Advanced Warfare except now horribly mutilated. The maps are small and full of obstacles deliberately placed to promote close range SMG shootouts over long range shots. Moreover, maps went from 3D to 3Lane, introducing lots of obstructions, headglitch spots and long corridors lined by invisible walls. Adding to that, all the weapons have been made a lot more precise and most SMGs are quite effective at 50 metres, rendering proper sniping moot. The FMJ attachment is supposed to improve penetration but any given obstacle being penetratable at all is wildly inconsistent. The movement mechanics, again, are, in a sense, more limited than in AW but with the shrunken maps they are more than enough.

    Scorestreaks: Instead of customizable scorestreaks from AW (a great improvement) there are now lots of one-trick vehicles which can be easily shot down with a few launcher missiles. No more map-specific scorestreaks either. Overall this feels like a great step back.

    Special abilities: Specialist abilities are just different from Exo-abilities. You no longer start with a full charge each life but rather charge it over time and score. On the other hand, specialist weapons tend to be a lot more destructive than anything else and some abilities are great for clutch plays.

    Overall: I would say that Black Ops 3 feels very forced. The borderline synthetic map design and weapon equalization waste the potential gained from what was fixed. And the whole "More like the classics" design idea doesn't work well with the futuristic wall running and explosive bows.

    Single Player: The campaign is not good. There are lots of fan theories explaining it all and creating a sensible timeline and plot but actually playing the campaign is not enjoyable. It's a disjointed experience devoid of really great moments or a global plot arc. More than anything, it's full of frustratingly stupid decisions made by every character without any player agency (since it's not an RPG, obviously).

    Zombies: Instead of a typical horde mode Zombies becomes an obscure adventure-like experience where you have to collect artifacts, perform rituals and do all sorts of songs and dances that have nothing to do with actual shooting. The biggest indicator of this is the "have one player kite the last zombie around while the other three are doing the item collection/beast transformation/easter egg completion" tradition. Is it fun? Maybe. Is it in line with the rest of the game? Not so much.

    And last but not the least, PC-specific issues: At the moment of writing several weapons are downright imbalanced, like Drakon, the semi-auto sniper rifle that is a 2-hit kill at any range, has very little recoil and can be shot repeatedly for quite some time due to a 28-round magazine. The server quality, at least in EU (and, I think, Australia too) is downright unacceptable with random disconnects and horrible lag and rubberbanding issues a lot of the time. Many bugs and absent features too, like mouse inversion when aiming scorestreaks by tablet, lack of separate control for ADS mouse sensitivity and the like. The matchmaking is somewhat questionable, mixing good players with all sorts of other players.

    Although Treyarch/Activision might get a solid B for effort, the post-release support and communication are almost absent. If it stays this way, the game might not hold its own on PC for very long.    … Expand
  28. Glaicer
    Dec 6, 2015
    1
    Singleplayer is just bad blueprint of somebody's ideas. Just miss it please.
    Multyplayer (important thing to buy for me) is rotten, broken, dead, beating in convulsions. Dedicated servers is BS! Heavy lag compensation, bunch of cheaters since day 1, horrible class and weapon balance.
    Optimization still isn't here boys. 1 month passed, 1 month.
    Waste of money
  29. Daroe7
    Dec 5, 2015
    2
    This game was a major bummer. I don't want to come off as pretentious, but I am a pretty good player on the COD series. I always manage to adapt to the game, even on the first day. After the recent titles of the series, I thought that it was bound to go downhill. And it did. I'm not going to lie, this game is not worth the hype. Every COD I pick up I do well in, and have a good time. AndThis game was a major bummer. I don't want to come off as pretentious, but I am a pretty good player on the COD series. I always manage to adapt to the game, even on the first day. After the recent titles of the series, I thought that it was bound to go downhill. And it did. I'm not going to lie, this game is not worth the hype. Every COD I pick up I do well in, and have a good time. And each time my experience is a little bit different, THAT'S why I like it. They introduce little things here and there that make the game fun. COD4 had some of the best hit detection, guns, mechanics and sounds/gun feel for its time and holds true today. The modern Warfare series all had a special feel to them, 2 and 3 really had something working for them and I can't quite lay a finger on it. Black ops 1, people didnt seem to like but I enjoyed it. This is when I went from an average player to exceptional player, always top of the leaderboard. Black ops 2 comes around and knocks it out of the park, despite a crappy beginning release. Now I don't know if I can say I have high hopes for BO3, because the launch issues BO2 had were pretty minor in game mechanics, like spawns and whatnot. BO3 has good spawns, I won't lie. At least I havent been dogged by em too hard. But the issues at launch for BO3 are so scattererd I can't even really offer advice. Playing this series so long, BO3 felt like the down syndrome brother to BO2. Improved graphics, wall running and insanely obnoxious specialists all sum up a pretty bad game. ("did we mention we added water play??") I always played the COD series for the multiplayer experience. Each game offered me something I enjoyed. Even Ghosts, the most hated game of all. At least ghosts had immaculate hit detection and unique, fun to use guns. Shots fired. BO3 is so uncharismatic it HURTS. The guns are lame, the gun sounds are lame (exception: snipers) and gun feel is lame. When you pick up a gun, it should feel unique. In bo3, there are maybe 3 guns that really feel different. And that's just minute. This feels like a copy pasted edition of the series, and really was disgusting. I played the beta, had a bad time. Picked up the game for whatever reason, hated it every day. I played BO3 hard, I mean really hard. Because I wanted to see if it was just me. It is a harder game, sure. But my learning curve time is quick, every game until now I have bested in the first week. Its been nearly a month, and I still hate it. TTK is egregious, the guns are egregious, the new abilities are egregious, and this game is egregious. I have never felt more taken advantage of from a developer, as this game was so highly hyped. Why? no idea. I was SO skeptical when AW came out, because of all the changes made. But it turns out AW is my favourite COD now, I have more hours in that game than all the others. Not combined, but definitely a lot. And that game is only a year old. After AW I was excited for a slower, more conventional cod. they messed it up. Its not slower, in that you can play it casually. If you want to do even decently, you have to lean forward and tough it out. Its unbalanced in the guns, if its a big map I'm screwed. if its a small map Im screwed. You need to make like 50 classes just to cope with the unbalanced guns. The guns that are good for long range, die at close. The guns that are good for close, die at range. Thats normal for the series, yeah. But its NOT normal how badly the gap counters your efforts. Usually when there is an OP gun in a COD its actually a sign of balancing. Believe it or not, it means that a select few guns are consistent. BO3 is nothing but inconsistent guns. I never noticed a SINGLE trend. No one using one gun, no one sticking to one gun. Its all over, and no one is consistent. The fact that my K/D is over 1 right now baffles me. I feel like this game punishes you with its lack of care, and the Vonderhaar and his buddies felt like this was just another one for the bank. Sure, its playable, sure, it's manageable. But its not enjoyable at all. Really, it isn't. I have never played a game for a month straight and said to myself, "Why are you still playing this trash?" Even ghosts I was having a blast. I feel like BO3 is just a poorly edited conglomeration of a million COD's worst qualities mashed into one. It's painful. I would rate this game a 2. Worst COD I have ever played.… Expand
  30. leopoldo
    Dec 3, 2015
    7
    Call of Duty: Black Ops III was a game I was very excited before the release because everything in BO2 was great, but unfortunately was not what happened in that game. The story has no connection with the BO2, but at least it is Ok. The gameplay in the campaign is very simple, with nothing remarkable or different. At least the multiplayer is great fun, even remembering very AdvancedCall of Duty: Black Ops III was a game I was very excited before the release because everything in BO2 was great, but unfortunately was not what happened in that game. The story has no connection with the BO2, but at least it is Ok. The gameplay in the campaign is very simple, with nothing remarkable or different. At least the multiplayer is great fun, even remembering very Advanced Warfare, but has very leg.O zombies mode is better than ever. Call of Duty: Black Ops III could be one of the best CoD, but uninteresting campaign, and the leg of the game will not let that happen, at least the zombies mode is incredible. 7/10… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

21
#21 Most Discussed PC Game of 2015
35
#35 Most Shared PC Game of 2015

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
73

Mixed or average reviews - based on 10 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 10
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 10
  3. Negative: 1 out of 10
  1. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Dec 3, 2015
    60
    A bit better than the Ghosts, but worse than Advanced Warfare – new Call of Duty is awkwardly trying to make some changes in single player, but adding a bunch of technical problems in the same time. Multiplayer it is flawless as usual. [Issue#258]
  2. Riot Pixels
    Nov 30, 2015
    60
    Treyarch should have created one awesome sci-fi campaign instead of three mediocre ones.
    Read full review
  3. Ragequit.gr
    Nov 14, 2015
    81
    Treyarch gives us a Call of Duty game that is brimming with content and is sure to provide hundreds of hours of entertainment to its buyers. It’s just a shame that the focus on the quantity of content ended up causing a lack of polish in some areas.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »