Battlefield 4

 PC
User Score
6.3

Mixed or average reviews- based on 4118 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2,054 out of 4118
  2. Mixed: 847 out of 4118
  3. Negative: 1,217 out of 4118
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. FaccaoGamer
    Nov 7, 2013
    10
    BAttlefield4 best hueheuheuheuheuheuheuheuehuehuehuehuehuehuehueheueuheuheuheuhuehuehueuheuhuhuheuhuheuhuhuheuheuheuheuheuhuehuheuhuheuhuehuheuheuhuheuheuh
  2. valesyde
    Dec 25, 2013
    10
    Great game in keeping with the BF tradition. The Battlepack system is a great addition and the graphics are insane. Early issues with crashing appear to be fixed and i havent had any issues in a while. I highly recommend.
  3. Maj_Brian
    Nov 6, 2013
    9
    Surprised that a lot is giving this game a 0. This game has been an epic experience from day one to now 2 or 3 weeks later. the single player is bland but the multilayer makes up for it. The only reason I did not give it a 10 was the day 1 glitches soon to be fixed
  4. NotAnnoyingNPC
    Nov 7, 2013
    9
    The multiplayer is awesome with full scale maps but there are things which just dissapoint me like simple things like walls that can't be destroyed also the Campaign is total crap
  5. Detroitphan
    Nov 8, 2013
    9
    [Xbox 360 owner] Well, I am a complete idiot...It took me just about a week after hours of frustration, complaining online to DICE and EA (don't get me wrong, there's still some issues) about how horrible this game looks. I mean, it was insane, I thought I had wasted $60 and was demanding a refund. The biggest issues were the textures of outdoor and indoor environments. I enjoy the recon[Xbox 360 owner] Well, I am a complete idiot...It took me just about a week after hours of frustration, complaining online to DICE and EA (don't get me wrong, there's still some issues) about how horrible this game looks. I mean, it was insane, I thought I had wasted $60 and was demanding a refund. The biggest issues were the textures of outdoor and indoor environments. I enjoy the recon class, and sniping really showed how poor everything looked. I installed the game day one, and had the mandatory 2GB download once the game started. Then it happened....I NEVER INSTALLED THE 2nd DISK!!!! That's where the HD textures were hiding. THIS GAME ROCKS. I loved COD, and opted out of ghosts due to some pretty bad feedback and didn't want to shovel out another $60 just yet. I really enjoy conquest modes, and I guess I'm the only one who enjoys rush mode also. Looking forward to some new maps, but so far, I really do enjoy this game. Just wish I could pilot helicopters and planes, all in good time...… Expand
  6. Asdfire
    Nov 10, 2013
    9
    Everything is very good but if I didn't solve the same problem I had in battlefield 3 I would give 0
    I had to download simple port forwarding and forward port 3659 otherwise the game wouldn't join multiplayer.
  7. maor4774
    Jan 22, 2014
    9
    even so in the start the game was released with LOT of bugs, after DICE fixed them you can see the real game,now igenore the no-one should care about single-player, the multiplayer is one of the best i ever played, a huge improvement over battlefiled 3, with 3-4 friends to play with and you got the best multiplayer exprience ever, even so it sad that DICE removed the co-op that i loved ineven so in the start the game was released with LOT of bugs, after DICE fixed them you can see the real game,now igenore the no-one should care about single-player, the multiplayer is one of the best i ever played, a huge improvement over battlefiled 3, with 3-4 friends to play with and you got the best multiplayer exprience ever, even so it sad that DICE removed the co-op that i loved in 3, the game doing it job great and i recomended to every FPS fan to buy it.… Expand
  8. hadukao
    Feb 6, 2014
    9
    Battlefield 4 is a epic game with many innovations and a big quantity of bugs, but if you stop to pay attention, the creators are launching updates that are improving since the launch, and if you wait they will correct the rest, like in battlefield 3, i believe you need to wait until they fix the bugs and then, you can buy one of the best games made.
  9. BenjaNinja
    Dec 20, 2014
    10
    It's sad how this fantastic game gets bad reviews. The community here is full of haters who don't know their game and keep claiming that every BF game after BF2 is bad.

    BF4 filled all the missing features of 3, but is "bad because of bugs". BF3 is bad because it lacked all the features of the previous BFs. BFBC2 is golden and better than 1943, but worse than BFBC1. BFBC1 is bad    It's sad how this fantastic game gets bad reviews. The community here is full of haters who don't know their game and keep claiming that every BF game after BF2 is bad.

    BF4 filled all the missing features of 3, but is "bad because of bugs".
    BF3 is bad because it lacked all the features of the previous BFs.
    BFBC2 is golden and better than 1943, but worse than BFBC1.
    BFBC1 is bad because it's only for consoles.
    BF2142 isn't as good as 2.
    BF2 is the best BF.
    Seriously, this is ridiculous. I will go as far as saying BF4 is the best BF yet, as it is currently clean of bugs, but still receiving updates for balancing issues, which are mostly fixed now. BF4 was, at the start, completely unplayable, but is now 100% functioning, and now they've balanced out the weapons and vehicles, and this is all because of a hard-working team called DICE LA-they're in fact the most supportive/active developers I've ever seen. In fact, if I read a new forum post or watch a new Lvlcap video about balancing issues, a week later, DICE LA has fixed it in the newest update, which makes me think that they check absolutely every corner of BF4 hate on the internet. They really do their job well and are saving BF4 from being a buggy unbalanced disaster
    Sure, BF4 has had the worst launch of any BF game, but it sure is one of the best multiplayer FPS out there now (If not THE best). It's a game that improved on everything amazing BF3 did wrong, and sure put every CoD game ever made to shame.    … Expand
  10. Yorrrrrr
    Oct 29, 2013
    10
    This game is amazing!! In my eyes, BF3 was a very good multiplayer game, but THIS..OMG, it has improved on it, in every single area. Better graphics, sound, gameplay, maps. Good job DICE!
  11. busan
    Nov 6, 2013
    10
    cool....very many ...down....many..lag...many...server boom....but...
    THIS IS BF4 GAME OVER!!
    GOOD bye Call of duty....
    아오 못하네...
    배필
  12. Leraester
    Nov 6, 2013
    10
    Battlefield may not be the best at making SP, but who cares? In multiplayer you can drive tanks, fly helicopters, pilot jets, and sail battleships! Not to mention the awesome frostbite 3 engine! CoD Now releases that you can make holes in walls by using C4! Battle field now releases that you can take down skyscrapers. yeah, its a landslide. When CoD fanboys try to defend their game, theBattlefield may not be the best at making SP, but who cares? In multiplayer you can drive tanks, fly helicopters, pilot jets, and sail battleships! Not to mention the awesome frostbite 3 engine! CoD Now releases that you can make holes in walls by using C4! Battle field now releases that you can take down skyscrapers. yeah, its a landslide. When CoD fanboys try to defend their game, the only thing they can argue about is their fan base. It would be retarded to rate how good a game is because of its popularity. Battlefield 4 should be game of the year.… Expand
  13. Mbdelta
    Nov 15, 2013
    10
    Everything Battlefield 3 should have been and more. Single player isn't very impressive, but the multiplayer makes you forget it exists. A must buy for PC and NextGen players.
  14. michalospolakos
    Nov 2, 2013
    9
    Next AWESOME game from DICE. BF4 improves everything from BF3. There are great maps, great graphics (well, maybe it isn't graphic revolution but it looks fantastic). About single player, I even don't want to begin that. SP was always showcase of engine. Really worth play
  15. peperico
    Nov 18, 2013
    9
    Whatever others say, its always important to take a sneak peak yourself... I find the campaign gripping the story is, well, not the newest on the planet. But: the nuances are detailed and the sound mesmerizing. The scenery is breathtaking. The weapons so realistic. The characters amicable. I can identify with Recker et al. Graphics 10/10. Sound 10/10. 8/10 for Solo Campaign. 10/10 forWhatever others say, its always important to take a sneak peak yourself... I find the campaign gripping the story is, well, not the newest on the planet. But: the nuances are detailed and the sound mesmerizing. The scenery is breathtaking. The weapons so realistic. The characters amicable. I can identify with Recker et al. Graphics 10/10. Sound 10/10. 8/10 for Solo Campaign. 10/10 for Multiplayer. 9/10 Overall. This is a very complete game, in every way. Did you expect them to give you all this as an add-on to BF3?? Common guys, tell the truth, there is no better FPS out there. As in 2013. As in ever created. And I have played them all, from Half-Life to Treasure of Monkey Island. Stop expecting quantum jumps every time. It's miles better than Ghosts, no question. But then BF was always better than CoD IMHO. More realistic. My opinion. Period.… Expand
  16. cappugino
    Nov 18, 2013
    9
    Nearly perfect!
    The game would be the perfect Battlefield experience for all fans.
    The maps are big and intense. The sounds and graphics are amazing. And the gun-play feels a lot more realistic than in Bf3.

    I would like to give the game a 10/10 but there are still some sound bugs and client crashes for me.
  17. Grimmherz
    Nov 12, 2013
    10
    In all honesty, there is no point in buying this game on current gen consoles, because it's a next gen game. If you play it on PS3 or Xbox 360, it's hardly recognizable as a Battlefield game. Just get it for PC or buy it on PS4 or Xbox One.

    Battlefield 4 is an amazing game, and DICE really stepped up this game with Frostbite 3. It's really an improvement to Battlefield 3. There isn't    In all honesty, there is no point in buying this game on current gen consoles, because it's a next gen game. If you play it on PS3 or Xbox 360, it's hardly recognizable as a Battlefield game. Just get it for PC or buy it on PS4 or Xbox One.

    Battlefield 4 is an amazing game, and DICE really stepped up this game with Frostbite 3. It's really an improvement to Battlefield 3. There isn't any reason that I've found yet to give this game a negative score, however I do think that the whole "Levolution" thing is a huge gimmick. The only maps that really have any Levolution are Siege of Shanghai, Flood Zone, and Paracel Storm. Those are the only maps where once the Levolution occurs, the maps are significantly different. And even then, it's still pretty gimmicky.    … Expand
  18. TheColonelKiwi
    Nov 21, 2013
    10
    vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv… Expand
  19. Ctigrisht
    Dec 25, 2013
    9
    From all the FPS that i've played, this is the first one where the allied AI kill the enemy AI (In the campaign). The graphics and the game play are far better the COD Ghosts, but due to the system requirements, for some computers there are enormous lags.
  20. Schlorgan
    Oct 30, 2013
    9
    The Single-Player is a lot better than Battlefield 3s and also any recent Call of Duty game. It's a lot less linear and makes an effort to tone down the racism. Also, it looks AMAZING. Best on PC or on next-Gen consoles.
  21. Cuscaden
    Oct 31, 2013
    9
    I have an upper middle class gaming rig, with a Radeon 7850. Game runs beautifully at 1920x1080. It looks superb, there is a noticeable difference from BF3 to BF4. The maps are very well done, and there are some great effects which really add to the game atmosphere. Its early days, and I have only played for a few hours, but my reaction so far is overwhelmingly positive. Dice haveI have an upper middle class gaming rig, with a Radeon 7850. Game runs beautifully at 1920x1080. It looks superb, there is a noticeable difference from BF3 to BF4. The maps are very well done, and there are some great effects which really add to the game atmosphere. Its early days, and I have only played for a few hours, but my reaction so far is overwhelmingly positive. Dice have delivered a winner. No bugs or any issues stopping me enjoying the game so far.

    The launch appears to have gone smoothly, however I am not a happy camper about EA´s decision to have a disjointed release, they should aim for a unified worldwide release. It was very frustrating have a pre-order and not being able to play for two days whilst US players could.    … Expand
  22. jski
    Oct 30, 2013
    9
    I never write reviews on this site or any site for that matter. Really, the critics should guide your decisions when trying something new. They are professionals, and it's there job. But I had to get on here to balance out this stupid COD rivalry going on (which, by the way, seems to me to be mostly COD players attacking BF4).

    The game is really great. It improves nearly every aspect of    I never write reviews on this site or any site for that matter. Really, the critics should guide your decisions when trying something new. They are professionals, and it's there job. But I had to get on here to balance out this stupid COD rivalry going on (which, by the way, seems to me to be mostly COD players attacking BF4).

    The game is really great. It improves nearly every aspect of the online player experience (except the weapon modification screen which is frustratingly complicated, though I'm getting a handle on it). If you liked BF3 or if at least it interested you but wasn't your thing, check out BF4. DICE and EA are ambitious and most of it they pull off well. If you didn't like BF3s brand of warfare, or prefer smaller, moshpit inspired gameplay chances are BF4 isn't for you. BF4 doesn't want to cater to COD-type warfare. What they do in BF4 is improve their special brand of combat and it really shows. Stop the COD vs BF4 hate. Just play your games and, if you really want to have a good time, stop worrying about the nerdiest rivalry ever and just play both games because they are both good in their own way.    … Expand
  23. clorster
    Nov 1, 2013
    9
    The best FPS game i never had playing before and it's look so real. but there was also a bad side the single player. there was many bugs and other fails. battlefield 4 is the best Multiplayer fps game and the new snipers is so cool. it's easy to nonScope wiht sniper.
    don't remenber it's the best game but there was only bugs in single player
  24. insomniMACK
    Nov 17, 2013
    8
    Another great title, another avalanche of whiny 0 reviews on metacritic. I won't waste my time making fun of the man-boys who cry about getting the Russian version, or the TOW missiles not being strong enough. It doesn't matter, they'll all be playing this game still in a year.... and will still be crying then. No, BF4 is stellar. The campaign is decent, but gorgeous. I approve of theAnother great title, another avalanche of whiny 0 reviews on metacritic. I won't waste my time making fun of the man-boys who cry about getting the Russian version, or the TOW missiles not being strong enough. It doesn't matter, they'll all be playing this game still in a year.... and will still be crying then. No, BF4 is stellar. The campaign is decent, but gorgeous. I approve of the campaign replacing BF3's CoOp as a vehicle for unlocking Multiplayer weapons. No longer do you have to HOPE that you aren't going to get paired with some neanderthal who sucks at the game AND doesn't use his headset in order to unlock awesome guns for MP. The campaign is actually pretty good, but multiplayer is better... now that it's patched. I'm taking a point off for this. Shame on you DICE, MP is THE reason people play BF. You shoulda greased it, and scored a 10 on that. I'm not going to blast the game though, because 1. it's a really awesome game, and 2. DICE has fixed the bulk of the issues and is working on others. All in all, great game, big thumbs up, and I can't stop playing it… Expand
  25. wisefool
    Nov 7, 2013
    10
    I just finished the campaign for only 4-5 hours and its not worth it but the graphics is just amazing. I'm enjoying multiplayer without crashing that's why this game deserve's 10/10!
  26. theblazer90
    Feb 2, 2014
    9
    ok for one when the game came out it was a buggy piece of **** but it showed a ton potential now fast forward a few months to February, they've ironed out MOST the bugs but there is the occasional crash. ok on to the game itself... The single player is **** But the multiplayer is what you come there for its fun fast paced and exiting. plus destructible maps. go buy... its worth it.
  27. SwedishReview
    Nov 5, 2013
    9
    Wait untill they release some patches and the game will be playable right now it's not so good but later when the patches come it will be playable i hope people will stop critze the game even the game isn't bad the bugs and problems are. everyone is so spoiled.
  28. Diggo11
    Nov 5, 2013
    10
    Improved from bf3, a good step forwards. This is what fps in the next gen should look like. Had a few problems during the beta, but it's baffling the user score for this game is so low...
  29. AaronOlstead
    Jan 25, 2014
    9
    Simply a masterpiece. The game has a great storyline and multiplayer is addicting. I'd recommend this to any COD fan. New levels, new weapons and new multiplayer modes make this game fun.
  30. Startrance
    Nov 6, 2013
    10
    Best shooter this year by far, sure the single player isn't much to like but the single player isn't what's important it's the multiplayer and the multiplayer shines very bright. Amazing game-modes, good weapons, leveling scale, gorgeous graphics, everything is just right in the multiplayer.
  31. Stormcrow666
    Oct 31, 2013
    8
    Much like Battlefield 3, BF4 is very clean and polished. The single player experience though is very short, which considering the size of the game itself if somewhat perplexing. BF4 is mostly a multiplayer game, since the 64 player battles are what people are paying money for.
    I liked the game and the story but there are some plot holes that I cannot really figure out, but all in all a    Much like Battlefield 3, BF4 is very clean and polished. The single player experience though is very short, which considering the size of the game itself if somewhat perplexing. BF4 is mostly a multiplayer game, since the 64 player battles are what people are paying money for.
    I liked the game and the story but there are some plot holes that I cannot really figure out, but all in all a good game.
    The faces on the characters and environments are well rendered but see to be of the same generation that BF3 was. I played on ultra with 0 lag but I have a high end PC.
    Pretty much BF3 part 2.    … Expand
  32. OcraM-SA
    Nov 1, 2013
    10
    Battfield is back! This game is what BF3 should have been, an extension of the brilliance that was Bad Company 2. The real destruction is back, blowing out walls and bringing down houses has never felt better. The maps are great, heavily detailed with destructible cover everywhere. Battlelog is also much improved, being able to set your loadout prior tto going into a fight is a welcomeBattfield is back! This game is what BF3 should have been, an extension of the brilliance that was Bad Company 2. The real destruction is back, blowing out walls and bringing down houses has never felt better. The maps are great, heavily detailed with destructible cover everywhere. Battlelog is also much improved, being able to set your loadout prior tto going into a fight is a welcome addition. Overall BF4 offers a brilliant and unique online experience. My real score is an 8.5 but I will give this game a '10', just to compensate for the retards that are giving it a '0'… Expand
  33. thebread
    Nov 5, 2013
    10
    Pretty much the best FPS game to grace the world today. The maps, the weapons, the vehicles, and the environmental aspect of the game have improved for the better. And it looks like most people that are giving the game such a bad score are the ones having connection problems etc..

    Why not wait to review until they're fixed? And it's funny, because I've seen 1 star reviews on here that    Pretty much the best FPS game to grace the world today. The maps, the weapons, the vehicles, and the environmental aspect of the game have improved for the better. And it looks like most people that are giving the game such a bad score are the ones having connection problems etc..

    Why not wait to review until they're fixed? And it's funny, because I've seen 1 star reviews on here that say that "oh, if it wasn't for all the bugs this game would get a 10."

    The bugs will be fixed eventually. Give it some time and stop raging. In the meantime, I'm going to thoroughly enjoy BF4 without any hassle, just like I have been for the past few days.    … Expand
  34. strayder111
    Oct 31, 2013
    10
    The best Battlefield ever created. Very good optimization. I have i5-2500k and 7870 (1200/1450). 50-60 FPS in multiplayer. It is better then BF3!!!!!! Mb game have some lags, but patch will be soon,
    So, it is best military shooter today. Singlplayer is garbage....
  35. Faelun
    Nov 4, 2013
    10
    This game is absolutely amazing, Yes there are some problems with server stability right now but other than that its basically flawless. Let the haters hate.
  36. TheLogical1234
    Nov 2, 2013
    8
    I'm pretty sure this review is going to get immediately down-voted, but honestly a majority of the people who submitted scores likely did not play this game at all but saw it on the Metacritic front page and decided to submit a negative score just because its a modern-military shooter. Battlefield 4 is an excellent multiplayer game and a bland single-player experience, filled with bugs butI'm pretty sure this review is going to get immediately down-voted, but honestly a majority of the people who submitted scores likely did not play this game at all but saw it on the Metacritic front page and decided to submit a negative score just because its a modern-military shooter. Battlefield 4 is an excellent multiplayer game and a bland single-player experience, filled with bugs but still nevertheless enjoyable. To start off, this is not BF3.5. Here's a complete list of all the new features:

    Frostbite 3 engine (dynamic weather effects and destruction BF3's engine could not handle)
    Commander Mode returning
    Levolution
    Customizable knives and vehicles
    Counter-knife
    Improved and dynamic naval combat
    5-Man squads
    No blue tint
    China faction
    Platoons
    Spectator mode
    Improved and responsive Battlelog
    New character models that make it easier to differentiate between faction to faction
    Suppression improved; toned down on all weapons except for sniper rifles and light machine guns
    Field upgrades unlocks
    Spot animation
    New game modes like Obliteration and Defuse, as well as improvements to existing game modes such as Rush and Conquest.

    And that may not even be all of it.

    However, one big disappointment for me is the single-player campaign, its ends up turning into a Michael Bay explosions everywhere movie with little to no redeeming qualities. Its an improvement over Battlefield 3's, with much more open environments that allow players to approach levels in multiple ways, but ultimately is pointless. The pacing and writing is abysmal, characters are thin, and is not worth a play-through.

    But as a multiplayer game it succeeds. The 64-player battles are unmatched, the destruction is more Bad Company 2 style, as well as a new mechanic called "Levolution." Most of these major map-changing events are triggered by players, but some are not. Levolution is mostly scripted but still nevertheless enjoyable, and change the tide of the battle immensely. Some Levolution events are better than others, the skyscraper on Siege of Shanghai gets old after it falls down 3 or 4 times, but other events like flooding the city on Flood Zone are far harder to trigger and change up the overall gameplay.

    The reviews on here are just purely immature, Battlefield 4 is an excellent game, it has noticeable launch issues which decreases its overall appeal but is worth the price of admission.    … Expand
  37. Broncoman206
    Nov 12, 2013
    9
    I Pre-Ordered Battlefield 4 because i thought it looked really cool, I was surely not disappointed as this is a great game. I am not saying it is flawless but it is all around a clean and fun... A very good buy with months of enjoyment!
  38. bigga
    Nov 3, 2013
    10
    Give DIRETIDE༼ Give DIRETIDE༼ Give DIRETIDE༼ Give DIRETIDE༼ Give DIRETIDE༼ Give DIRETIDE༼ Give DIRETIDE༼ Give DIRETIDE༼ Give DIRETIDE༼ Give DIRETIDE༼ Give DIRETIDE༼ Give DIRETIDE༼ Give DIRETIDE༼E༼ Give DIRETIDE༼ Give DIRETIDE༼ Give DIRETIDE༼ Give DIRETIDE༼ Give DIRETIDE༼ Give DIRETIDE
  39. Ozone021
    Nov 2, 2013
    10
    The most complete multiplayer FPS game out there. Audio, graphics, level design and levolution is just top class. 64-players epic battles with jets, boats and.. never mind. Goodbye family and friends, see you in the summer.
  40. Horrux
    Jul 1, 2016
    8
    This game started out broken and really not much fun at all. Skip forward 2½ years, and now the humongous and plentiful problems are mostly gone. You can even get a 60-tick (or more!) server if you can afford it. One of the problems with early BF4 was the 10-tick (updates 10 times a second) servers and how they updated: you could unload on someone and all the bullets would hit them at theThis game started out broken and really not much fun at all. Skip forward 2½ years, and now the humongous and plentiful problems are mostly gone. You can even get a 60-tick (or more!) server if you can afford it. One of the problems with early BF4 was the 10-tick (updates 10 times a second) servers and how they updated: you could unload on someone and all the bullets would hit them at the exact same time, when the server updated on the next tick. The experience was just not good.

    Now, however, it runs very smoothly and the experience is overall very good. It is much better with a few Squadmates over Teamspeak, but if you find yourself a good squad, you can use the integrated VOIP and have a very fun teamwork experience.

    It's not revolutionary, it's the same battlefield as BF3, only somewhat tweaked, destruction refined, and with a LARGE number of maps and modes.

    Hardly worth full release price at the time, but it's a bargain now: you can easily put in 500 hours before becoming anywhere near bored, as it offers excellent variety.

    10/10
    - 1 for being basically a BF3 rehash
    - 0.5 for the Battlelog clunkiness
    - 0.5 for not being Steam compatible    … Expand
  41. HighwayUK
    Nov 6, 2013
    9
    BF4 on PC right of the bat has one of the best (if short) campaign modes I've played in many years, better even than Bad Company 2's, most certainly better than every COD game of the current crappy console generation. Multiplayer? well server issues aside as per usual at launch, been having an absolute blast with this game, yea it's annoying to have launch bugs and glitches, but at leastBF4 on PC right of the bat has one of the best (if short) campaign modes I've played in many years, better even than Bad Company 2's, most certainly better than every COD game of the current crappy console generation. Multiplayer? well server issues aside as per usual at launch, been having an absolute blast with this game, yea it's annoying to have launch bugs and glitches, but at least it's fixable stuff... unlike COD Ghosts, which played today and it's utter junk compared even to old games like Crysis 1. DICE have done a great game once they iron out the battlelog and server problems. 9/10... A MUST HAVE GAME on PC.… Expand
  42. Pipemastersven
    Nov 24, 2013
    9
    The negative reviews here are the reason that you can never trust a hyped games score on metacritic this game is much much better that a 6.2...
    Everyone worried about 1st day glitches and server issues (that are arguably much better than any other mass multi game out there)
    Anyone also playing this game for the SP campaign is foolish why they even include it, I don't know I would mark    The negative reviews here are the reason that you can never trust a hyped games score on metacritic this game is much much better that a 6.2...
    Everyone worried about 1st day glitches and server issues (that are arguably much better than any other mass multi game out there)
    Anyone also playing this game for the SP campaign is foolish why they even include it, I don't know I would mark them down here if I cared (I only play it for the M249)
    Overall, this is the best current MP shooter game available I don't care if you have a hard-on for COD or CS1.6 this has the best mix for customisability/graphics/environment and realism (aside from ARMA) available.
    Whilst I don't think this game's initial maps were as good as BF3 (except Paracel Storm) I think the variation within each level is amazing i.e. you can have close quarter fighting in a map with vehicles this brings a whole new dynamic to the game that we didn't have in BF3
    I think, like BF3 (and remember enthusiasts, BF3 wasn't without a massive amount of issues too) BF4 will improve as the title goes on for the next 2 years e.g. the Sniper class NEEDS to be nerfed it is far to COD like (to note, this is a negative) and too easy to master

    Overall I mark this down for the required tweaks, but am not emotional enough to let it ruin an otherwise perfect game!    … Expand
  43. Invader-Nik
    Jan 13, 2014
    8
    Yes it looks like Battlefield 3 and yes it has problems, but this truly is a great game. The campaign is the same old generic story, but replacing Russians with Chinese. Multiplayer is epic. I loved Battlefield 3's multiplayer very much. BF3 was the game that got me into main stream FPS games, and I loved it so much. Battlefield 4 took the scale of battles from BF3 and expanded them, thusYes it looks like Battlefield 3 and yes it has problems, but this truly is a great game. The campaign is the same old generic story, but replacing Russians with Chinese. Multiplayer is epic. I loved Battlefield 3's multiplayer very much. BF3 was the game that got me into main stream FPS games, and I loved it so much. Battlefield 4 took the scale of battles from BF3 and expanded them, thus creating Levolution. Sure, some of the levolution features are useless, like when the tower collapses in Siege of Shanghai, the rest of the match gets boring. CoD: Ghosts doesn't hold a candle to this. Anyone who thinks Ghosts is better than this is an idiot.

    I love the new customization options. Getting to look at your gun. Lots of camoflauge, guns, vehicles and attachments.

    It still has bugs, but it is a good game. 8/10    … Expand
  44. panderson1988
    Nov 4, 2013
    8
    It's a solid game overall, but it has a few issues. The biggest one is a few bugs like sound issues to servers/game crashing on you in multiplayer. They have acknowledge that and are fixing on it, so hopefully that will be resolve soon. The other issue I have, and sadly it's common practice now, but the premium and DLC packs. In a sense I don't consider these packs taking away from theIt's a solid game overall, but it has a few issues. The biggest one is a few bugs like sound issues to servers/game crashing on you in multiplayer. They have acknowledge that and are fixing on it, so hopefully that will be resolve soon. The other issue I have, and sadly it's common practice now, but the premium and DLC packs. In a sense I don't consider these packs taking away from the main game because the amount of maps the main game has is on par with all previous titles have at launch. The downside to me is the fact at one time maps and DLC was free, or even cheap, not $15 for four maps.

    Furthermore the gameplay is good as always, but the biggest improvements is the map design is a little more open then 3 in my view. Metro and other maps failed at times as it was too linear for a BF game without multiple access points, and these maps seem to have corrected that issue. Also there is more emphasis on vehicles on some maps, and even naval warfare on a couple of maps. Finally the levolution technology which is a cool idea seeing certain parts of the map changing the dynamic of your strategy, but it isn't always executed well. Some maps change how you attack a point, but other times it just adds some debris in the way.

    In regards to the single player campaign it's nothing special. It has some cool moments and it's fun, but it isn't long or anything revolutionary. It's a typical popcorn flick in which there is a lot of action, a basic story without much character development, and it consists a few what you would call wow moments. Overall the game feels more stable then BF3, and it has some nice changes which I think are good. If you like multiplayer shooters, definitely check out; however, if you are a player who randomly enjoys them, then wait for a sale on the main game or get BF3 as you have plenty of choices for your FPS fix.    … Expand
  45. Zyromkiru
    Oct 8, 2015
    10
    Still a fun game with active servers well after release. It had a buggy start but is now a lot better. It's gameplay feels even more smooth than battlefield 3, the maps look amazing and the gun play is quite fun. For normal mode the game irritates the heck out of me but I enjoy playing Hardcore which feels perfect to me.
  46. SJ555
    Nov 5, 2013
    8
    And here comes the new entry in two-year franchise .

    The visuals are sure fire and PC version is all the time looks good. The sound effect are awesome though voice-acting and soundtrack is forgettable . The SP is merely 6 Hours long BUT overall it was nice, it have its own moments in which it lives perfectly . The MP looks good but has many technical flaws . Overall pretty    And here comes the new entry in two-year franchise .

    The visuals are sure fire and PC version is all the time looks good.
    The sound effect are awesome though voice-acting and soundtrack is forgettable .
    The SP is merely 6 Hours long BUT overall it was nice, it have its own moments in which it lives perfectly .

    The MP looks good but has many technical flaws .

    Overall pretty decent game    … Expand
  47. expellite
    Jun 9, 2014
    10
    Great shooter. I think it's much better than the previous installment. To make a long story short "Just enjoy the game"! Graphics are amazing but the foliage is not so beautiful however,
  48. focistapista
    Dec 21, 2013
    9
    Although the game is having technical problems like crashing and bugs, DICE rolls out a patch every two weeks or so, and the bugs and crashes are slowly but steadily disappearing (crashes are already virtually non-existing). When the game works, it is the most amazing multiplayer you can have right now. The destruction is a big advancement from BF3, there is only a few things more coolAlthough the game is having technical problems like crashing and bugs, DICE rolls out a patch every two weeks or so, and the bugs and crashes are slowly but steadily disappearing (crashes are already virtually non-existing). When the game works, it is the most amazing multiplayer you can have right now. The destruction is a big advancement from BF3, there is only a few things more cool than blowing up a wall an enemy is using for cover, or crushing an entire building onto a cluster of pesky snipers. Battlefield 4 offers the biggest variety of gameplay from tanking to stealthily flanking the enemy team to flying a jet around the whole map. It is definitely worth spending $60, or even $110 on. Though I might get frustrated because of the bugs and hit detection, but the next day I get right back in and have a blast… Expand
  49. Phear
    Nov 5, 2013
    9
    Now that the constant server crashing is all over with the game is awesome. People need to be patient. I wish the Commander mode had more things to do on some maps though. The single player was short but that was expected in a game designed for multiplayer.
  50. miwoj
    Feb 25, 2014
    10
    I have no idea why people say it's a broken game. It works 100% fine, i'm having no problems at all. Instead I'm having tons of fun. It's like BF3 but slightly better. And new game modes are great.
  51. KillerCornflake
    Dec 31, 2013
    8
    Back on the battlefield again, the game features a short and sweet single player mode which gives BF3's campaign a run for it's money. The graphics are as nice as they were in BF3 with a few noticeable improvements, bit choppy on ultra even for the high end rigs which was a bit unexpected. The sounds of the various objects in the game are still fresh, it makes for some really intenseBack on the battlefield again, the game features a short and sweet single player mode which gives BF3's campaign a run for it's money. The graphics are as nice as they were in BF3 with a few noticeable improvements, bit choppy on ultra even for the high end rigs which was a bit unexpected. The sounds of the various objects in the game are still fresh, it makes for some really intense moments that can make even the most casual FPS player feel like a hero if they so wish.

    The multiplayer mode is as good as it ever has been, it's battlefield, you know what you're getting as far as game-play is concerned, there is no comparison to the sheer fun that can be had. Personally, i have experienced a few annoying connection issues that with persistence can be overcome, EA does seems to get this wrong a lot (you'd think with all the money saving from shutting down the old servers, the newer ones would be up to the job, no?).

    So, enough with the praise and onto the gripe, there is a reason why this game scored 8/10 apart from all the other faults you might find when playing it yourselves, and that is one word, BATTLELOG. A PC issue first and foremost, why does this thing still exist? Why is the integration of social media and games becoming a thing nowadays? The whole experience of having to open each game through a window makes the product feel like it is held together with tape, it doesn't FEEL like a complete game, almost like the game was an afterthought and battlelog itself should take centre-stage, totally unnecessary, just stick to menus, please.

    All things considered, it's a good and fun game to play, best played with friends or relatives in squad play to rack up points, the single player is a definite step up from BF3, so check it out.    … Expand
  52. SenshudoTV
    Nov 7, 2013
    9
    Battlefield 4 delivers a fresh new experience to multiplayer while continuing the existing experience from Battlefield 3, with a variety of new features. While DICE continues to improve at telling singleplayer stories, it’s defiantly a major improvement from Battlefield 3 and is a defiant buy.
  53. lolfactor100
    Jan 13, 2014
    8
    Going through many of these reviews i see people giving 0-4 rating because they didn't like the campaign or they multiplayer was too buggy. First off you don't buy Battlefield for the single player. It is at heart a multiplayer war game and that is what the developers focused on. And just because you crashed to desktop doesn't make the game bad, a bad game is when the game play sucks orGoing through many of these reviews i see people giving 0-4 rating because they didn't like the campaign or they multiplayer was too buggy. First off you don't buy Battlefield for the single player. It is at heart a multiplayer war game and that is what the developers focused on. And just because you crashed to desktop doesn't make the game bad, a bad game is when the game play sucks or the graphics are **** Nether of these apply to this game. The game play is solid and it is visually stunning. Also, there and not even close to as many glitches as people say there are. After the first week i have yet to have the game crash on me. I've actually had Assassin's Creed Black Flag crash more than BF4. So don't believe what everyone is say and buy this game. It is amazing and you will enjoy it if you were ever a fan of the battlefield series.… Expand
  54. NoahGilroy
    Nov 21, 2013
    9
    I've spent around 70 hours with the game since release and I'm happy to say that this game is a blast! At release there were a few issues and there still are but these don't really hinder me from enjoying the actual game. The gameplay is better than ever and I'm going to spend a lot of time in this game with friends or family. The visuals are nothing short of astounding on the pc. I can'tI've spent around 70 hours with the game since release and I'm happy to say that this game is a blast! At release there were a few issues and there still are but these don't really hinder me from enjoying the actual game. The gameplay is better than ever and I'm going to spend a lot of time in this game with friends or family. The visuals are nothing short of astounding on the pc. I can't speak for the consoles as I am PC player. If you're thinking about buying the game keep in mind that you need a decent PC and think about persuading your friends into buying the game as it is a ton more fun with good communication.… Expand
  55. PTYBDJGamer
    Nov 6, 2013
    8
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. If you want to skip the boring part, just scroll down to the text that says: When BF4 was..._____________

    Crossing over from the Call of Duty franchise to the Battlefield franchise wasnt easy, ive been playing CoD since 2009 and been playing Battlefield since 2010. At the time, I was a CoD fanboy and didnt play anything else, I thought to myself "This game is so good, there will never be a better shooter", and while that was true for some of the CoD games I played, the series quickly came to a downfall. I had pre-ordered BO2 hardened edition and payed roughly £100 for it, a mistake I would regret. That was when I told myself that I would never play another CoD again. What was there to play then? Battlefield. As I said earlier, it was hard for me to cross over, mainly because the game styles from the two games differed so much, CoD was run and gun, Battlefield was PTFO. I got BF3 for my birthday and played the heck out of that game, I simply loved it. Eventually I actually got good at it, and at the end of my BF3 days I was actually proud to call myself a good Battlefield player.

    When BF4 was announced I was very excited, and eventually I pre-ordered the Limited Edition and BF4 Premium, something that I have not regretted. When the game came out it was a mere disappointment, lots of bugs and glitches, client and server crashes, game modes broken etc. They had also nerfed the vehicles, giving them a limited supply of ammunition, a mechanic which I hate. They had increased the time it took to reload flares and ECM Jammer from 7 secs to 22 secs, something which keeps you from killing people before some person with a stinger locks on to you and you have to go back to your base. I have to say though that playing as infantry is a lot of fun now, more than it was in BF3, but the horrible netcode gives you those "How the f*ck did he kill me?" moments. I would have given this game a 7/10 until I heard that DICE will be making the limited vehicle ammo thing for hardcore servers only, and also possibly changing the Flare/ECM reload time. That made me give the game a 8/10. Of course, they will be fixing the bugs, and when they do the game will propably get a 9/10 by me. The campaign had a horrible story but very satisfying and fun battles, but Battlefield as CoD is centered around the multiplayer and not the singleplayer.

    If you dont mind people having all the unlocks before you and being at a disadvantage, I suggest you buy the game 1 or 2 months after the release. But if you can resist the bugs and want to have all the unlocks at the same time as the others, then I highly recommend that you buy the game now.    … Expand
  56. Thatweirdguy
    Nov 25, 2013
    9
    This game is way to realistic to be compared to call of duty ghost which totally sucks ..call of duty is getting worst every year and i consider ghost to be the worst game ever a lot of people got it refunded Maybe because its crap there was like 18 guys trying to get a refund having seen any for Battlefield 4
  57. mraqbolen
    Feb 25, 2014
    8
    Of a man who never played Battlefield 3 and has just started pc gaming a few months ago, I've wondered if the Battlefield series could live up to the hype as well as being a fun game for new comers or noobs like me. well what i can say right now is yes.

    Battlefield 4 caught my interest when i first saw the building fall on the E3 demo, and the first question you asking is does it hold    Of a man who never played Battlefield 3 and has just started pc gaming a few months ago, I've wondered if the Battlefield series could live up to the hype as well as being a fun game for new comers or noobs like me. well what i can say right now is yes.

    Battlefield 4 caught my interest when i first saw the building fall on the E3 demo, and the first question you asking is does it hold up, and what i have played which is every map and both dlc's . is yes it completely made that building fall down seem like a ordinary day in the battle of Battlefield 4, from the moment i get into battle i immediately get sucked in to the beautiful worlds and maps of BF. thanks to the frostbite 3 engine every gun bullet and shred of grass is well realized and well thought out in the maps in multi player of BF4.

    but i bet your wondering, is the game fun.... well yes it is, the game play in BF4 is very well done with almost all guns being very balanced and for a novas it was not to difficult to get the hang of BF4 with a couple tip videos and some practice you should be on your way to being a killer in the Battlefield.

    some of the flaws are some balancing issues and some weird glitches and bugs sometimes, also some crashing and on last gen consoles the devs really had to pull back on some things to keep in range of the old hard ware of the PS3 and the Xbox 360, making that great Battlefield experience on pc, not even close on last gen hardware. on next gen it is is almost the same experience on pc, if your wondering

    this game is a fun and enjoyable game for novices and noobs and i will be playing i until l i see the Battlefield 5 logo on my origin account in 2015. i give it a 8.5/10    … Expand
  58. Jmz01
    Nov 4, 2013
    9
    Just going to say straight off, the crashes and bugs in the game are pretty annoying, im not going to deny that this game has issues, but underneath all that is a pretty damn awesome game on the multiplayer side of things. The map design beats bf3's by a long shot, the guns feel great, graphics are gorgeous and overall, it's a blast. Levolution, while awesome to look at, doesn't shakeJust going to say straight off, the crashes and bugs in the game are pretty annoying, im not going to deny that this game has issues, but underneath all that is a pretty damn awesome game on the multiplayer side of things. The map design beats bf3's by a long shot, the guns feel great, graphics are gorgeous and overall, it's a blast. Levolution, while awesome to look at, doesn't shake things up as much as I was hoping, but on the other hand, they did bring back the destructible buildings that bc2 had, and thank god for it.
    As for game modes, conquest and rush are still as fun as they always were, and the addition of obliteration, while frustrating at some points, can really have some tense moments, and overall, is very enjoyable.
    Singleplayer was crappy and forgettable, but let's be honest, why the hell would you buy a battlefield game for the singleplayer.
    Overall, underneath the bugs and crashes is an outstanding game, and if they are fixed, which they should be, it can get the chance it deserves to shine.    … Expand
  59. Dwarfy
    Nov 5, 2013
    9
    Batttlefield 4 is a phenomenon! Graphics are still outstanding, Levolution has increased the creativity, guns that are more sway and better to use! I just hope the next battlefield ha major changes in graphics but even though they added LEVOLUTION Battlefield 4's still a let down and needs to be acknowledged. PLEASE EA! Make a great story! It's only 4-8 hours on regular difficulty withBatttlefield 4 is a phenomenon! Graphics are still outstanding, Levolution has increased the creativity, guns that are more sway and better to use! I just hope the next battlefield ha major changes in graphics but even though they added LEVOLUTION Battlefield 4's still a let down and needs to be acknowledged. PLEASE EA! Make a great story! It's only 4-8 hours on regular difficulty with missions where you just shoot guys but without popcorn movie cliches like Call of Duty does. Overall Battlefield 4 is a great and beautiful multiplayer game that is MUST OWN! Even though the campaign is dull or not interesting multiplayer is the heart of the Battlefield Series. I have rated it a 9.5/10… Expand
  60. watsonmw
    Nov 5, 2013
    9
    Really this is two games:

    Singleplayer 1/10 Complete waste of time. Levels are horrendously designed, AI sucks, dialog sucks, story suck, mechanics are possibly good but who know because the level design is pants. Multiplayer 9/10 Takes all the best from previous bf games and improves the gameplay. Technically it looks fantastic. Level design is much improved. Only hampered    Really this is two games:

    Singleplayer 1/10

    Complete waste of time. Levels are horrendously designed, AI sucks, dialog sucks, story suck, mechanics are possibly good but who know because the level design is pants.

    Multiplayer 9/10

    Takes all the best from previous bf games and improves the gameplay. Technically it looks fantastic. Level design is much improved. Only hampered by crashes and long load times, but that will probably improve as patches are released.    … Expand
  61. contract
    Nov 6, 2013
    8
    Graphics 10/10 probably one of the most beautiful and attention to detail games I've ever played

    Audio 9/10 multiplayer has bug with one weapon, but it's wonderful on my 3d headphones Optimization 10/10 Regularly get 70 fps on a 2 year old hd 6950, ultra graphics _____ Multiplayer 4/10 Netcode/lag/crashes/server lag, it's all there. I have played to battle rank 20 with more    Graphics 10/10 probably one of the most beautiful and attention to detail games I've ever played

    Audio 9/10 multiplayer has bug with one weapon, but it's wonderful on my 3d headphones

    Optimization 10/10 Regularly get 70 fps on a 2 year old hd 6950, ultra graphics

    _____

    Multiplayer 4/10 Netcode/lag/crashes/server lag, it's all there. I have played to battle rank 20 with more than 50% crashes. I've forwarded my ports, I've re-installed the firmware on my router, I've downloaded the amd beta drivers, I've repaired the game, I've checked every possible fix out there, and I still crash. It's not fun. When I can play, I find myself being killed around corners, through walls, and never beating anyone 1 on 1 at point blank. The only way to get kills is to flank and kill from behind, and even then when I try to, they wind up figuring out I'm shooting them in the back and one shoting me instantly. It's never taken more than 2 bullets, less than a half a second, to kill me, no matter the distance they shoot from. I can't kill anyone 100+ meters before they kill me, it's just not possible. My accuracy on conquest is under 5%, while on domination (close range sneaking up on people) it's 15%. It might be because I suck, but I'm not the only one.

    Single player 6/10 I enjoyed it, but to be honest it wasn't action packed. There were moments in the scripted story that were amazing, and I really loved it, but the actual game-play was terrible. I played on normal, and the ai was pathetic. I enjoyed how they tried to flank me every now and then, but it was like shooting fish in a bucket, completely without a point and felt like a grind to the next action packed story. It was a better movie, even though the story-line wasn't really that comprehensible, than it was a fps.

    I'll give it an 8 because I'm nice and I really want updates so I can play this damn thing. In the future, please try to fix all these bugs before release, not everyone is as forgiving as me.    … Expand
  62. rzk
    Nov 7, 2013
    8
    battlefield 4 want to be first but he need to be beter in playability... i don't find the same changement when i see battlefield 3; i have played 4 different battlefield and the beter i think its the bf3 because its was awesome this battlefield need to be upgraded. For its design and graphics no one do beter
  63. sciontc1
    Nov 8, 2013
    8
    Battlefield 4 isn't without its draw backs. As a whole the game is good however the single player aspect of the game is really lacking and far too predictable. The game however is more meant for multiplayer use and in that area it really does exceed all expectations (when it works). The game is riddled with bugs yet they are being fixed gradually. Had DICE/EA not released it so soon andBattlefield 4 isn't without its draw backs. As a whole the game is good however the single player aspect of the game is really lacking and far too predictable. The game however is more meant for multiplayer use and in that area it really does exceed all expectations (when it works). The game is riddled with bugs yet they are being fixed gradually. Had DICE/EA not released it so soon and worked on bug fixing I'd give it a 10 but due to the serious bugs and the amount of them even 8 might be being too generous.… Expand
  64. TwinKilla
    Nov 8, 2013
    8
    Campaign is pretty short but does offer some fun with the new weapons to unlock. Multi-player is vastly more fun than BF3 for me personally anyway I know alot of people will argue that this is just BF3 with new graphics and it pretty much is but there are alot of systems that have been refined.

    Only downside is that mutiplayer is very buggy and this needs to be fixed.
  65. My2ter
    Nov 12, 2013
    9
    There is a lot of new features and improvements compare to BF3. I don't know what people wanted after BF3 but imo this is a great game. Graphics are still awesome, for sure not mind blowing after BF3 but definitely better. Gameplay is a lot more enjoyable and different map to map. Maps are gigantic and with all the modes I never feel like playing again the same way. And the audio... justThere is a lot of new features and improvements compare to BF3. I don't know what people wanted after BF3 but imo this is a great game. Graphics are still awesome, for sure not mind blowing after BF3 but definitely better. Gameplay is a lot more enjoyable and different map to map. Maps are gigantic and with all the modes I never feel like playing again the same way. And the audio... just fantastic, it put you in the action so much more. I recommend this game 100%… Expand
  66. gridironcpj
    Nov 13, 2013
    8
    After the fixes following the game's launch and after playing it for hours on end, I can say that this game is a true successor to Battlefield 3. The gameplay has been improved on a micro level, such as how your character interacts with the environment (swimming underwater, two scopes on one gun, character holding gun up higher when walking in water, etc.) and on a macro level withAfter the fixes following the game's launch and after playing it for hours on end, I can say that this game is a true successor to Battlefield 3. The gameplay has been improved on a micro level, such as how your character interacts with the environment (swimming underwater, two scopes on one gun, character holding gun up higher when walking in water, etc.) and on a macro level with levolution and some nice polish with the upgrade system, Battlelog, etc. My only complain with this game is that it does not look that great visually (outdated 2011 graphics) and it runs worse than BF3 (same hardware will produce worse results on BF4 than BF3, yet the demand is essentially the same). This game would likely look better and run better if it was not produced for consoles as well. I can't complain too much though, as my dual GTX Titans and i7 3930K @4.4GHz has no problem producing over 100FPS on Ultra settings @2560x1440.… Expand
  67. KarmN
    Nov 14, 2013
    9
    This isn't a FPS game! It's a true war simulator! Other than a few crashes and the dumb use browser instead of an in-game menu system, this game is out of the park!
  68. NerdyJack
    Dec 24, 2013
    8
    First of all, when you read a review, do click on the profile of the reviewer. Be aware of those f**kers who gave every single game they reviewed a 0 or 1, or those haters who gave this game a 0 and cod ghost a 10, and these are the only two games they reviewed. IMO those ppl should be banned forever from reviewing any games and their reviews be removed.

    Then it comes to the review. I    First of all, when you read a review, do click on the profile of the reviewer. Be aware of those f**kers who gave every single game they reviewed a 0 or 1, or those haters who gave this game a 0 and cod ghost a 10, and these are the only two games they reviewed. IMO those ppl should be banned forever from reviewing any games and their reviews be removed.

    Then it comes to the review. I don't know why there are so many negative reviews, I purchased it when it was on sale 3 weeks ago, what I can say is that even the single player campaign worth the money! (though I have to say the story is ridiculous, and apparently they have no idea on what Chinese government is like today. The story is full of typical western bu**sh** and the story is for China in 70s)

    Funny that many ppl were b**ching about the netcode and crashes, b***sh** IMO, It only crashed twice, and the netcode problem only happened 4-5 times for me. Played the game for more than 40 hours. Definitely not like what those haters overly exaggerated about (Or maybe it's the new patches that fixed these problems Idk).

    Problems do exist, that's why I gave it an 8.
    1, Story is full of typical western bu**sh** abt China like I said. Misleading as hell.
    2, Multiplayer unlocks are gone after finishing the single player campaign, come back after several matches tho, but that was very frustrating cuz I thought those unlocks were gone forever.
    3, 75 Ticket bug.
    4, Stats won't show up in battle log until, I don't know, 2-3 hours later I guess. A long lag like this is not acceptable.

    That being said, this is still an awesome game, not a 10/10 but definitely 8.5/10. Definitely worth ur money I promise you that!    … Expand
  69. elchurro
    Nov 16, 2013
    9
    This is the year that BF beats out CoD. I played COd and I'm done and probably not going back again! The only complaint this year for BF is the game feels buggier than the BF3 launch and I'm still getting a lot of lag even on sub 20 ping servers. The Battlelog is even deeper than before and the maps are entertaining so far. 15 hours in and I'm enjoying the ride.
  70. Firvox
    Nov 24, 2013
    8
    As Chinese player, some of us have to use an monthly-paid internet connection booster to play the game. Otherwise the game will lose connection while in Loading Level stage.

    Anyway, the game is great.

    10 for performance
    10 for gameplay
    5 for network
    5 for origin platform
  71. epoc
    Dec 29, 2013
    8
    When I first got this game I went to multiplayer, and that's exactly what you should do! It is FLIPPING amazing. It's better than Ghosts multiplayer, it's better than Shadow Falls multiplayer. But why? Because it has some of the best map design ever. Destructible environments, viechles and dynamic changes. For example, on one map it starts to rain, blocking your vision, or blinding anWhen I first got this game I went to multiplayer, and that's exactly what you should do! It is FLIPPING amazing. It's better than Ghosts multiplayer, it's better than Shadow Falls multiplayer. But why? Because it has some of the best map design ever. Destructible environments, viechles and dynamic changes. For example, on one map it starts to rain, blocking your vision, or blinding an enemy with your laser sight. It also has some awesome modes like obliteration and levoultion. But the king of these modes is the old champion commander mode! It adds in more teamwork and makes battles more tense, knowing that at any moment the enemy commander could be a click away from launching a missile. And it just happens to be one of the best looking game ever! The game also makes guns feel real and alive. Sometimes you will get a glitch that takes you out of the experience. However, this game has one of the worst campaign ever. It clearly rips of COD and is just stupid! Fix it and then you'll see your 10s go up.… Expand
  72. Hollow100
    Feb 15, 2014
    8
    I really love the game! The SP campaign had a great story and was very fun to play, though the ending felt rushed. The campaign contained a list full of bugs as well, so does the multiplayer mode. But other than the rushed ending and the bugs, the campaign and multiplayer experience is amazing to play.
  73. Swight
    Nov 14, 2014
    8
    Alright so I've played this game over half a year now and I'd like to share my pro's and con's with you.
    (Based on bf3 and bfbc2)
    Pro's: Improved graphical fidelity More destructive terrain More weapon customisation Cool phantom achivements Improved movement on foot Faster combat Lot's of game modes Con's : Vehicle spam on most maps in conquest Ctf,sqd,tdm are dead game modes    Alright so I've played this game over half a year now and I'd like to share my pro's and con's with you.
    (Based on bf3 and bfbc2)
    Pro's:
    Improved graphical fidelity
    More destructive terrain
    More weapon customisation
    Cool phantom achivements
    Improved movement on foot
    Faster combat
    Lot's of game modes

    Con's :
    Vehicle spam on most maps in conquest
    Ctf,sqd,tdm are dead game modes
    Ground suppression is way too high
    Ballistic shield and other gadgets are really weak
    Vehicle collision is really really bad    … Expand
  74. BAGArt
    Dec 29, 2013
    8
    for campaign: too short. minimum transport. minimum cooperation. best graphic and opportunity, but plain and simple single play
    rus: движок(10/10) 3)
  75. SkyWoof
    Jan 1, 2014
    8
    It is no mystery that this game has it's share of problems. But the amount of complaining has become contagious and 'DICE hating' is trending real big right now.

    So here's my take on it.... I just built myself a new gaming rig. I'm running 2 GTX 780s SLI and an i7 4770k. On this rig, BF4 rarely EVER crashes. And I mean RARELY EVER. When I had a 650ti Boost, I was experiencing    It is no mystery that this game has it's share of problems. But the amount of complaining has become contagious and 'DICE hating' is trending real big right now.

    So here's my take on it....

    I just built myself a new gaming rig. I'm running 2 GTX 780s SLI and an i7 4770k. On this rig, BF4 rarely EVER crashes. And I mean RARELY EVER. When I had a 650ti Boost, I was experiencing more crashes, but that was several patches ago. I don't ever have the audio dropping problem anymore either. So they ARE optimizing and patching, but for it to be flawless on everyone's different computers will take a lot of time.

    This game is not for the "weak in specs". You need a strong machine to take advantage of this game and its graphics. I get 140 frames per seconds and I can tell you that the game is gorgeous. The movement is fluid and smooth, the audio is great, and I'm having a blast playing with my clan and random squads. BTW, I'm all about the multiplayer, but the campaign is nice too.

    Now for the bad (which isn't a deal breaking issue with me). The game's current netcode (the software engineering that is responsible for online play) needs a lot more tweaking. There is a current bug, the '1 shot kill' bug, that was supposed to have been patched a few patches ago and hasn't been. This bug is extremely frustrating and it makes it appear that the person who killed you is using some kind of a cheat. There ARE hackers in this game just like any other PC game, but this bug has caused the entire community to being suspicious of each other and it goes to create a lot of hostility and frustration. I'm one of you above average players and I am now getting consistently "hackusated" almost every day as I improve at BF4. While I take it mostly as a compliment, I have actually been banned by some butt hurt admins who didn't like me killing them repeatedly. Hence why I have started recorded my gameplay and posting to Youtube.

    Another issue (for me at least) are that the anti-air vehicles and weapons are too powerful, and helicopters and jets (mainly helicopters) aren't as much fun to fly as in previous titles. The range of these weapons creates a scenario that if more than 1 player on the opposite team are using stingers, IGLAs, air radar missiles or the mobile AA tanks, it is pretty much impossible to fly around the map, and most of the time you will be destroyed as soon as you take off from base (which is unacceptable).

    Aside from these 2 complaints, I cannot in good conscience say that this game is anything but great. While it doesn't bring anything really new or groundbreaking to the table (other than levolution which is pretty to look at but usually has a negligible effect on gameplay), it is still a solid FPS game with nice maps, gorgeous visuals and audio and high replay value.

    In conclusion, it is worth the $60. The $100+ for Premium is kind of a rip off, you don't get much from it. Be prepared for some multiplayer frustration though, but just keep in mind that it is the netcode and not a hacker 95% of the time and you won't lose too much hair over it.    … Expand
  76. Chrono7x
    Jan 7, 2014
    8
    The game is overall enjoyable, especially in the multiplayer aspect. Which is to be expected. It really shines when you get a group of friends together in a squad and blast noobs as a unit. The campaign is short and could be better, but it's a good few hours if you get tired of multiplayer.

    I haven't had much trouble with crashing like others have, but my connection to Battlelog    The game is overall enjoyable, especially in the multiplayer aspect. Which is to be expected. It really shines when you get a group of friends together in a squad and blast noobs as a unit. The campaign is short and could be better, but it's a good few hours if you get tired of multiplayer.

    I haven't had much trouble with crashing like others have, but my connection to Battlelog sometimes does break. It causes the occasional nuisance.

    Graphics are fantastic, and the multiplayer is unparalleled. When it comes down to it, if you can afford the upgrade from BF3, go for it. Otherwise, it isn't a huge change from BF3, but it is different in some respects.    … Expand
  77. JonesAddict
    Jan 30, 2014
    8
    DISCLAIMER: This review is for the 360 version only and not the PC version.

    I would have initially have given this game a 4 or 5 out of 10 due to my horrible experiences with it. However, now that they have patched up some of the core, and most aggravating, problems, the game is actually a lot of fun. I see that several of the views below, the negative ones, bash the levelution    DISCLAIMER: This review is for the 360 version only and not the PC version.

    I would have initially have given this game a 4 or 5 out of 10 due to my horrible experiences with it. However, now that they have patched up some of the core, and most aggravating, problems, the game is actually a lot of fun.

    I see that several of the views below, the negative ones, bash the levelution system which provides us with the destructibility of each map. I'll have to disagree with many people here about that. From personal experience, I'd say that it makes a lot of difference in how you play the game, if you actually think ahead and take your environment into consideration. If you're one of those people who just run around killing people, the destruction physics will mean nothing to you no matter how good it is. There was one time which me and my squad-mates were hold up in a building as we tried to defend the area from the assaulting enemies. Sure enough, with enough firepower the entire building collapsed, leaving us with no cover and a harder to defend point. So instead, we decided to use some guerrilla tactics and destroyed their attacking vehicles with C4. The changes to the environment that happen can make it look like you just stepped into a new area although it is so damaged that it looks foreign, not to mention the amazing graphics which add much more immersion to the environment of each map.

    Now, the initial problems that I mentioned before had to do with their servers. It was impossible to play with friends, Battlelog wouldn't work, and servers were laggy and hard to get into. It was annoying that I couldn't play with my friends, and due to that I almost returned the game. However, with the most recent patch, it seems they have almost solved the problem completely. Although the exclusion of a party system in game can be annoying, it can easily be worked around due to the flexibility of in-game team switching. The server problems which plagued BF4 previously can only be seen on some occasions and they aren't as bad as before. I can also proudly say that Battlelog works perfectly fine, however it is rather useless.

    For the in-game issues, the gameplay itself works well. It is impossible to drop-shot and quick-scoping is almost impossible as well. The guns aren't balanced at all, however the game itself relies on the strategic thinking of the player to win situations, and not the gun itself. However, if you are in a straight up, no-cover, shooting match with someone with a better gun, you will lose, which is how it should be. The fact that you have to continue to play with a certain class or vehicle in order to unlock more for it can be kind of annoying, as compared to COD:Ghosts squad point system, however you can earn enough score by completing objectives and aiding your team, which also helps you level up.

    The Commander system is also a nice addition to BF4. With it, you can see the map from an eagle-eye perspective, aid the team with UAVs, EMPs, supply drops, squad promotions, and the ability to order squads to objectives on the map. Not to mention the addition support options which you can use when your team has specific objectives on the map, such as an AC-130, cruise missiles, and a map-wide infantry or vehicle stand; you can even mark enemies for everyone to see for a period of time if they have a 6-kill kill-streak! Although it seems like having a commander can win you any game, most of the time no one uses the feature, and when they do they don't seem to do much with it. If your team sucks and refuses to listen to commands, having a commander won't make much of a difference. However it may be able to make you lose just a little less.

    Overall, I recommend this game to anyone who enjoys the First-Person-Shooter experience and wants a more realistic game than COD.    … Expand
  78. Grafonn
    Feb 15, 2014
    8
    Плохая одиночная компания, а мультиплеер очень классный и хорошо сбалансированный, но плохая оптимизация игры на компьютерные версии .
  79. Siberith
    Feb 4, 2014
    8
    Battlefield 4 does not fall short at amazing. The gameplay is intense, graphics are amazing, and the destructive environment is better than ever. Though its very similar to Battlefield 3 it does have a few more in-game sparks to keep it interesting. Things such as field upgrades which improves your overall gadget systems based off of how well you play as a team, and emblems for you andBattlefield 4 does not fall short at amazing. The gameplay is intense, graphics are amazing, and the destructive environment is better than ever. Though its very similar to Battlefield 3 it does have a few more in-game sparks to keep it interesting. Things such as field upgrades which improves your overall gadget systems based off of how well you play as a team, and emblems for you and your clan to show off.

    Unfortunately, EA pushed this game out quicker than it should. The game still has glitches, and extreme frame-rate drops at times, even for the console versions. There is also a few minor things that isn't apart of the game. There is no co-op missions, you can't invite friends to a squad before going in-game. You have to follow them in and hope you guys end up on the same team. The only way to customize any of your load outs is through in-game customizations. You can't change load-outs on the My Soldier like you could on BF3. You're also only limited to customizing the specific vehicles on the map. For example, say you play on Operation Locker, a close quarter combat with no vehicles, but say you unlock a new camo that you want to put on your tank. You have to wait till you are on a map with that tank available to put it on. Also, in Battepacks you are awarded things like "New Emblem" and "New Solider Portrait." This has left many confused of where to locate those items. The only way to locate those items is through the computer by logging into your battlelog. This can be a hassle especially if you want to just change your emblem/clan tag.

    Like I said, Battlefield still is an over-all amazing game, but there is still a lot of things they left out or over complicated that could of been made easier.    … Expand
  80. Iancito2001
    Feb 17, 2014
    10
    This game is better that Call of Duty Ghost,im right now playing more Battlefield 4 that Call of Duty Ghost. Tha game is fricking realistic the Weaponds have recoil and everything,thats what i like. Call of Duty Ghost sucks is the same thing OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN.
  81. Uncag3DM3xican
    Feb 22, 2014
    10
    Without crashes, this game is one of THE BEST fps shooters. But the game is riddled with bugs that are slowly being fixed. I think the beta should have been earlier so they could have fixed more bugs.
  82. SmartHand
    Sep 23, 2014
    10
    On PC, the game is really beautiful!

    The bug is corrected , and it became a pleasure to play ! The " evolution " is really well done

    And is game immersive and very fun
  83. Zak21
    Jul 7, 2014
    9
    The Battlefield franchise has it's ups and downs. In this case, for Battlefield 4 has sure pleased me. Battlefield 4 is a "First Person Shooter (FPS)" and is FILLED with action and pure excitement. I have played this game for around 200 hours and I must say that it is a well-balanced game, but does contain bugs.

    When this game first launched in it's Beta, it had uncountable problems.    The Battlefield franchise has it's ups and downs. In this case, for Battlefield 4 has sure pleased me. Battlefield 4 is a "First Person Shooter (FPS)" and is FILLED with action and pure excitement. I have played this game for around 200 hours and I must say that it is a well-balanced game, but does contain bugs.

    When this game first launched in it's Beta, it had uncountable problems. Network issues, game issues, absolutely terrible service, and overall a bad experience. Now although DICE, the developers of Battlefield 4, has fixed most of these issues after the initial release of the product, it still contains issues to this day.

    DICE is constantly trying to improve, but doesn't allow room for that to happen. Recently, in the upcoming game "Battlefield: Hardline," a new developer team "Visceral" has teamed up with DICE and took control of the new product. They initialized an 'Open Beta' for the game and I got a chance to play it. It is going to be a great game and there were not many bugs, but I will save that review for another time. While DICE is a great team, Visceral beats DICE at least in the support department because they were really open to criticism and suggestions, which DICE is coming shy of.

    So while this game has it's ups and downs, I think it does deserve more attention as they are always improving it. I'd suggest it to a friend.    … Expand
  84. jpm224
    Jul 13, 2014
    10
    NOTE: My experience with this game only began AFTER the "net-code patch" that apparently fixed a lot of the issues people were having with it from release-May 2014. Also, my actual score would be a 9, but I am giving it a 10 to try and balance the ridiculous number of "0" ratings on here.

    I held off buying BF4 in protest of what I saw as EA and DICE's ruining the series by    NOTE: My experience with this game only began AFTER the "net-code patch" that apparently fixed a lot of the issues people were having with it from release-May 2014. Also, my actual score would be a 9, but I am giving it a 10 to try and balance the ridiculous number of "0" ratings on here.

    I held off buying BF4 in protest of what I saw as EA and DICE's ruining the series by "call-of-dutifying" the way new installments in the series are handled. However, during the recent sale I made the leap and picked up the base game.

    In short, this is everything Battlefield 3 should have been. Despite what people have said about BF4 being rushed out, I believe it is the other way around: This game makes me think that BF3 was rushed to release before it could become the game DICE wanted it to be. That game, in my opinion, is BF4. While many things here do look nearly identical to BF3 at first glance, anyone who has played a good amount of the latter will immediately notice that nearly every feature has been expanded upon and simply made to feel more "complete": Much larger (and better) maps, BC2 style destruction (collapsing buildings are back!), in-game VOIP for squad members, Commander mode, multiple weapon attachments, different classes of jets (stealth fighers vs. attack fighters), the AC-130 incorporated into the base game (awesome, btw), and a much larger assortment of weapons, items, perks, etc - Quite simply this is everything that BF3 was expected to be. Release issues aside, I strongly believe that much of the hate for BF4 can largely be attributed to the fact that BF3 was not yet the "complete" Battlefield game which DICE envisioned.

    Fans of Bad Company 2 will be happy to know that the destruction which was so lacking in BF3 is back in full - Buildings can be blown apart in much smaller increments, and once more can collapse entirely if enough damage is done. The maps also have a BC2 flair to them, with many taking place in semi-tropical environments reminiscent of the best Conquest/Rush maps on offer in Bad Company 2 (Isla Innocentes, Laguna Presa anyone?).

    In the end, this is still the same Battlefield I know and love, and I am glad I finally let curiosity get the better of me and made the purchase. While BF4 is more refinement over innovation, it is a definite improvement over its predecessor and in my opinion one of if not the best Battlefield game to date.    … Expand
  85. animta111
    Aug 18, 2014
    10
    i dont get why people are hating on bf4 it has some issues but its better in every way shape and form from graphics to game-play play lighting guns sound like real guns
  86. behi8303
    Nov 11, 2014
    8
    Gameplay (of 10) : 8
    Story (of 10) : 6
    Graphic (of 10) : 9
    Sound (of 10) : 8

    Total : 7.6 / 10

    Total score is weighted average of four factors, respectively Gameplay, Story, Graphic, Sound.
  87. DrugsMeazureTim
    Nov 10, 2014
    8
    AWESOME Graphics. short but good singleplayer. multiplayer is awesome. controls are VERY responsive ! and the gameplay feels like your really there but there's few problems also. glitches and A LOT of time waiting for a loading screen. anooying but i can forgive
  88. jojn
    Mar 3, 2015
    8
    They have finally released the winter patch. It does improve alot of things but this is OVER A YEAR to fix these issues that they've since launch. I still would not buy Battlefield 4. Save your money or go buy a more solid shooter like Rising Storm or many of the other Fps's on the market.
  89. Nestrio
    Nov 17, 2021
    9
    Battlefield 4 is the ultimate online multiplayer FPS experience in my opinion, at least until Battlefield 2042 comes out. The online battles are oftentimes immensely intense, these taking place in large and well-designed maps for the most part. The weapons and gadgets are plentiful for each soldier class, allowing the player to use many different tactics during gameplay. The vehicles areBattlefield 4 is the ultimate online multiplayer FPS experience in my opinion, at least until Battlefield 2042 comes out. The online battles are oftentimes immensely intense, these taking place in large and well-designed maps for the most part. The weapons and gadgets are plentiful for each soldier class, allowing the player to use many different tactics during gameplay. The vehicles are really fun to use too, as they provide the player with a great amount of weaponry at disposal whether you want to engage in ground or aerial combat. Furthermore, the visuals are outstanding, even though this game is almost 8 years old at this point. The same praise goes to the realistic sound design as well.
    The singleplayer is mediocre, so if you're looking for a worthwhile story campaign, look elsewhere. However, Battlefield was never known for its singleplayer anyway.
    All in all, if you're looking for an unforgettable online FPS to delve in, then Battlefield 4 is one of the best choices you currently have.    … Expand
  90. AngryNerds100
    Jul 8, 2016
    9
    Most of these reviews were from the launch of the game. Now that the game had time to settle, the game is much better than it was at launch, and it's worth getting with all the DLC, especially when the game frequently goes on sale on Origin. Even if you're uncertain, there is a week long trial on Origin that you can try out.
  91. Ser_Olly
    Nov 19, 2015
    9
    Bare in mind, I'm reviewing this game in 2015. Yes, I was playing it during its launch. It wasn't so bad at launch, but then again, I was running this with two GTX Titans at the time, so things were quite smooth. This is easily the most complete shooter on PC. It's not a pure test of the reflexes like Call of Duty or Counter Strike. Strategy matters in Battlefield. The name says itBare in mind, I'm reviewing this game in 2015. Yes, I was playing it during its launch. It wasn't so bad at launch, but then again, I was running this with two GTX Titans at the time, so things were quite smooth. This is easily the most complete shooter on PC. It's not a pure test of the reflexes like Call of Duty or Counter Strike. Strategy matters in Battlefield. The name says it all, as every map is literally a Battlefield. There are so many ways to approach a situation in this game that there's always a thirst for more.

    The single player may be lackluster, but who purchases Battlefield for the single player? I'd honestly be happy with a Battlefield game that doesn't have a single player, but rather a well-polished multiplayer. Specialization is a much better approach rather than an attempt to make a game that's a "Jack of all trades." That's just one man's opinion though.    … Expand
  92. proteus555
    Jun 17, 2017
    10
    Multiplayer is awesome :c I dont understand why players hate this game! Maybe singleplayers is weak but battlefield 4 is not singleplayer but multiplayer game.
  93. ANTtheKNEEEE
    Nov 19, 2021
    10
    Even after the release of 2042, this is the best battlefield in the series still. IMO :DDD
  94. gold
    Jun 9, 2020
    8
    Да, получилось лучше чем 3 часть, но в общих чертах похоже, даже очень. графику немного подтянули.
    Итог: 8.491/10
  95. Darkvenom39
    May 23, 2018
    9
    I have been playing ever since the release and ever since they have fixed the bugs and issues the game became far and beyond infact its the best shooter if this generation better than the modern warfare series !!! i used to be a solider myself, my job was to make sure that guns and weaponry are ready to head to the fields and training, and i also tested new equipment, and this game makesI have been playing ever since the release and ever since they have fixed the bugs and issues the game became far and beyond infact its the best shooter if this generation better than the modern warfare series !!! i used to be a solider myself, my job was to make sure that guns and weaponry are ready to head to the fields and training, and i also tested new equipment, and this game makes me a solider again if its the realistic gun sounds, the environment and the way you head out in to the battlefields and realistic shooting !!! overall this is the last game EA didnt **** up i hate WW games i dont like the idea that they are going in to a historical generation with there new engine but i would really like to see them put events and interest in the game rather than a plain video game. I really recommend this game its fun and realistic and today you could get it for cheap and its defiantly worth your time !!!… Expand
  96. Schalv
    Oct 20, 2018
    10
    The best game of battle and total destruction and physics in this game is a marivilla to which you could not love this jewel!
  97. AMBO
    Feb 17, 2020
    9
    09/10......................................................................
  98. xeqt3r
    Nov 30, 2020
    10
    After all those patches and fixed, Battlefield 4 is the best multiplayer-shooter of the decade. I'm stil playing it in 2020.
  99. ElvlS
    Nov 24, 2020
    9
    it's incredible that so many gave this game a negative review. I put 1500 hours into the multiplayer (when it was popular) and I could jump back into it at any time and still have a blast. The multiplayer is one of the best (if not THE best) for a shooter. Campaign is meh which is why I dinged the game a bit but you don't play Battlefield for the campaign.

    The only reason there are so    it's incredible that so many gave this game a negative review. I put 1500 hours into the multiplayer (when it was popular) and I could jump back into it at any time and still have a blast. The multiplayer is one of the best (if not THE best) for a shooter. Campaign is meh which is why I dinged the game a bit but you don't play Battlefield for the campaign.

    The only reason there are so many negative reviews for this game is because the launch was a buggy mess. Even I stopped playing the game at launch and waited several months (if not a year I can't really remember). Most games nowadays come out a mess anyway so it's nothing new.

    Overall this game will probably go down as my favorite shooter multiplayer of all time. I struggle to find anything that comes close to replicating the amount of fun I had in this game.    … Expand
  100. AgentLvi
    Dec 27, 2022
    8
    Great game. The story is decent. The scoring is great, visual is really amazing, the voice & sound is also amazing
Page:

Awards & Rankings

44
#44 Best PC Game of 2013
7
#7 Most Discussed PC Game of 2013
27
#27 Most Shared PC Game of 2013

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
81

Generally favorable reviews - based on 52 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 42 out of 52
  2. Mixed: 10 out of 52
  3. Negative: 0 out of 52
  1. Pelit (Finland)
    Mar 11, 2014
    91
    Battlefield 4 could just as well be called Battlefield 3.5. The new Battlefield features are only marginal improvements over Battlefield 3, but even as such it leaves the competitors way behind. Hopefully the bugs will be squashed soon. [Nov 2013]
  2. GameCritics
    Jan 13, 2014
    60
    Even if multiplayer wasn't buggy, Battlefield 4 would still only be a barely passable installment in all respects besides the snazzy graphics. EA and DICE played it safe by providing the same thing they did the last time around, with another phoned-in campaign and only minor alterations to the online.
    Read full review
  3. Level7.nu
    Jan 3, 2014
    60
    Battlefield 4 keeps soldiering on in the same footsteps as previous games in the series. The lack of worthwhile news makes you wish for more. Dice stays in its comfort zone calls for explosions and not much more. The series needs to evolve or fade out.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »