Battlefield 4

 PC
User Score
6.3

Mixed or average reviews- based on 4118 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2,054 out of 4118
  2. Mixed: 847 out of 4118
  3. Negative: 1,217 out of 4118
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. oilreg
    May 7, 2014
    7
    if i would have needed to write a review about BF4 the first 3 months i would give it a rating of 4 Max, cause Dice released a game which was broken and unfinished at best. Most of us had constant crashes all over the place and we coudlnt even finish a single round.
    After now a good 6+ Month we have to admit that they finally fixed most most of the stuff, (insane long time period thou)    if i would have needed to write a review about BF4 the first 3 months i would give it a rating of 4 Max, cause Dice released a game which was broken and unfinished at best. Most of us had constant crashes all over the place and we coudlnt even finish a single round.
    After now a good 6+ Month we have to admit that they finally fixed most most of the stuff, (insane long time period thou) ... So those issues aside, BF4 is great to play if you love teamplay, however the the whole release is more like a BF3 DLC with a new name, graphics didnt get much better and the levolution they announced sooo big is more a fake, its tru big building fall, but its always the same so there is no AI to it, its more like a general map has two stages, one with all in tact, and one where most of the environment is destroyed. All over still a great game, but they way it was sold to us, and they horrible state it was delivered, should give them a big downrating, cause afterall it was a big cheat, imho    … Expand
  2. Aredyl101
    Jan 19, 2014
    6
    Long load times break it for me. Without a SSD to hold the 24+ GB install, expect loading times up to 5 minutes for larger matches. Constantly starting 5 minutes behind everybody else is a deal-breaker, as it allows a distinct advantage. EA and Dice should not expect everybody to purchase a SSD just to play their games, especially after paying nearly $120 in the game and season pass.Long load times break it for me. Without a SSD to hold the 24+ GB install, expect loading times up to 5 minutes for larger matches. Constantly starting 5 minutes behind everybody else is a deal-breaker, as it allows a distinct advantage. EA and Dice should not expect everybody to purchase a SSD just to play their games, especially after paying nearly $120 in the game and season pass.

    I'm rating this a 6 mostly since the game does function most of the time. So many features are still missing from BF4 that are found in most newer FPS games - matchmaking, balance between sides, pre-game lobbies, etc. The server style reminds me more of older FPS games such as Quake... at least Quake loaded within reason back in the day.    … Expand
  3. Storm1672
    Jan 1, 2014
    7
    Single player only tested

    The PC version despite of all the glitches is a better game than the console version ergo 8 instead of the 7 of the mediocre console version. It's a different game. The consoles lack explosions and effects that are crucial to the script. Many of the omissions make no sense at all. I even encountered much more glitches on the 360 version than the PC. The story    Single player only tested

    The PC version despite of all the glitches is a better game than the console version ergo 8 instead of the 7 of the mediocre console version. It's a different game. The consoles lack explosions and effects that are crucial to the script. Many of the omissions make no sense at all. I even encountered much more glitches on the 360 version than the PC. The story is crappy as hell, worst of all the CoDs and BFs so far, but the set pieces are nice and the gunplay is quite nice.    … Expand
  4. djordjissimo
    Nov 12, 2013
    7
    Good graphics,but poorly optimized for PCs,especially for 32bit ones! Storyline poor,no major plot. But we don't play a shooter for it's plot.When it comes down to the shooting aspect it is average. It is too easy to get all of the top achievements even on hard that you feel like an total terminator badass. During the campaign I only died twice. So overall BF4 such an average game in all aspects.
  5. dadum
    Jan 18, 2014
    7
    The current state of Battlefield 4 is not something that DICE or EA should be proud. Netcode is much worst for what it was in Battlefield 3 and annoying game crashes are still occurring to some people. However the overall balance and feel of the game is a lot better then the predecessor. Guns and maps feels more balanced then in Battlefield 3 excluding few maps. Vehicles feel awesome asThe current state of Battlefield 4 is not something that DICE or EA should be proud. Netcode is much worst for what it was in Battlefield 3 and annoying game crashes are still occurring to some people. However the overall balance and feel of the game is a lot better then the predecessor. Guns and maps feels more balanced then in Battlefield 3 excluding few maps. Vehicles feel awesome as before and now you don't have to get killed countless times in jets or helicopters to get flare unlock because they are unlocked from the at the beginning. Singleplayer is nothing special but after all Battlefield has always been about multiplayer and the singleplayer is mainly just there because its almost become a standard for Battlefield games to have it. Overall Battlefield 4 has a fun and great multiplayer if you exclude all the annoying bugs that might occur and the poor netcode that DICE has promised to fix.… Expand
  6. NeedForsleep
    Nov 21, 2013
    5
    This new Battlefield does not really live up to all the hype around it The Campaign is still bad Dice has a record of having bad campaigns nothing really special here just same old repetitive corridor shooting here and there. The ending is terrible its like DICE hired some of Bioware's story writers and asked them to make a story with a bad ending. The Multiplayer is ok but what reallyThis new Battlefield does not really live up to all the hype around it The Campaign is still bad Dice has a record of having bad campaigns nothing really special here just same old repetitive corridor shooting here and there. The ending is terrible its like DICE hired some of Bioware's story writers and asked them to make a story with a bad ending. The Multiplayer is ok but what really irritates me is the Crashes and bugs this is because of EA pushing it out the door just to get some money coming in. Now what all this wraps up to is a pretty dull game but do not buy this game on current gen Consoles they are outdated if you want the true experience purchase a high End Gaming PC or a Next gen console.… Expand
  7. HONDOMAN
    Nov 23, 2013
    6
    I have always liked the Battlefield franchise. It has always offered fun and enjoyable gameplay. Recently, I have grown tired of these modern-military shooters. They overcrowd the market. I really don't like to play them anymore, but Battlefield looked really good. The visuals, the levels, the destruction, it all looked good and I was eager to play it. When I first played it, I liked it,I have always liked the Battlefield franchise. It has always offered fun and enjoyable gameplay. Recently, I have grown tired of these modern-military shooters. They overcrowd the market. I really don't like to play them anymore, but Battlefield looked really good. The visuals, the levels, the destruction, it all looked good and I was eager to play it. When I first played it, I liked it, but it got really stale, really fast. It was way overhyped. Levolution doesn't really affect the game that much, it just make the map look different. The story is slightly better, but not really. A let down to say the least.… Expand
  8. Eeppi
    Nov 4, 2013
    7
    It`s a good game, while maybe there could have been more updates on the game and gameplay. I wouldnt buy the game only for campain cause it`s really bad. I`m still not sure what was the plot in it. I played it only cause it`s good action and things you can open in MP.

    Multiplayer is still great and Bf3 fans will get same things as in Bf3, and I really mean same things. Not really much    It`s a good game, while maybe there could have been more updates on the game and gameplay. I wouldnt buy the game only for campain cause it`s really bad. I`m still not sure what was the plot in it. I played it only cause it`s good action and things you can open in MP.

    Multiplayer is still great and Bf3 fans will get same things as in Bf3, and I really mean same things. Not really much new stuff, but it is still fun and haven`t lost it. Maps are time to time feeling too big for only 24 players, but you get used to it and will learn to find out the action. There are bugs in the Sp and Multiplayer that I hope will be fixed soon.. Those MP bugs can freeze your machine.. Whit new patches I hope they will fix these and maybe do something for the weapon damages too. There are really no differences between the weapons.

    I hope next gen version will be even better, whit 64 player MP and better Graphics. We will see    … Expand
  9. SuperMechaCow
    Dec 3, 2013
    6
    This game is published by EA. That should immediately tell you that it is garbage.

    The problems start arising before you even start playing. The entire game pricing method is based on the freemium model, except the lower-end and basic "free" content costs $60, and the additional content costs $50 or more. $110 for a single game. I wouldn't worry about "having to be online to play single    This game is published by EA. That should immediately tell you that it is garbage.

    The problems start arising before you even start playing. The entire game pricing method is based on the freemium model, except the lower-end and basic "free" content costs $60, and the additional content costs $50 or more. $110 for a single game. I wouldn't worry about "having to be online to play single player", because the single player is kind of garbage anyways. Forcing players to use a website AND origin instead of an executable client is a joke. The minor advantages of this far outweigh the negatives. Steam users be aware that integration with steam/steam overlay is difficult and nearly impossible.

    The dedicated servers are not maintained by the developers. There are frequent crashes, mostly due to the abysmal optimization for PC, which was supposed to be a key seller over COD. Honestly expect to be disconnected or experience a DirectX/driver crash once every three games. But hey, who cares? PS4 is where all the money's at, right?!

    The gameplay itself is so-so. Modes like Conquest capture the feeling of a large battle excellently. However, I realize that the game itself is only a few months old, and improvements will be made over time. The effort made in cross-platforming with Commander Mode of tablets is ambitious and worthy of applause.

    Ultimately, just play Battlefield 3.    … Expand
  10. Elguap0man
    Dec 21, 2013
    7
    I don't know why everyone is complaining about the bugs. I have had the game for 2 weeks, and it has crashed only twice. I would also like to point out that all the reviews that point out how buggy the game was came out over a month ago and the game has been patched repeatedly.

    The multi-player is fine OTHER THAN THE SPAWNING. The multi-player is tons of fun, but I recommend having a    I don't know why everyone is complaining about the bugs. I have had the game for 2 weeks, and it has crashed only twice. I would also like to point out that all the reviews that point out how buggy the game was came out over a month ago and the game has been patched repeatedly.

    The multi-player is fine OTHER THAN THE SPAWNING.
    The multi-player is tons of fun, but I recommend having a team to play with because you can occasionally get stuck with mentally challenged 4 year olds.

    This may be a personal thing but I find that I get spawn-killed WAY to much for it to be by chance.

    Unlocking things is an absolute pain and the game is not necessarily nice to new people. After two weeks, you should have a decent set of gear to choose from.

    The single player campaign is crap and makes no sense and it is made worse by the fact that you actually have to play it in order to unlock certain (good) weapons.

    The "Levolution" is just a gimmick and should be viewed as such. It is not a serious game play element. Sometimes, it is fun to take out campers by making buildings collapse, but that is it. It is simply for entertainment and is just a cool thing to have.

    Sidenote- RUSH IS INCREDIBLY ONE SIDED. THE DEFENDERS ALWAYS HAVE THE UPPER HAND. IF YOU EXPECT TO WIN A GAME OF RUSH WHILE YOU ARE ATTACKING, YOU BETTER HAVE ONE HELL OF A TEAM. ATTACKERS ALMOST ALWAYS RUN OUT OF TICKETS.
    However, since it alternates between defending and attacking, you won't go on a 30 rush game loosing spree and it is still fun even if you don't win.    … Expand
  11. ApetheticDonut
    Nov 10, 2013
    5
    Battlefield 4 brings so little to the table, its near Call of Duty levels of re-hash. The destruction is cool at times, and the 64 players on next-gen will allow consoles gamers to feel the true battlefield game play, but in all, it should of just been a expansion pack. Every main entry in the Battlefield series should have games in between to try new things to make sure they work, and ifBattlefield 4 brings so little to the table, its near Call of Duty levels of re-hash. The destruction is cool at times, and the 64 players on next-gen will allow consoles gamers to feel the true battlefield game play, but in all, it should of just been a expansion pack. Every main entry in the Battlefield series should have games in between to try new things to make sure they work, and if they don't won't, they put it in the next main entry. Battlefield 4 doesn't have that luxury, and falls flat on its face. Don't even get me started on the generic, military shooter campaign.… Expand
  12. igotproblems
    Nov 11, 2013
    6
    I wanted to love this game, battlefield is like crack to me, still get my fix online, but single player needed alot more work. Dice should re evaluate for the future before passing off another single player that doesnt make the grade.. The game is better without it (but who buys battlefield for single player anyways...and we know why...)
  13. samahl
    Nov 12, 2013
    7
    A lot of issues with connection and crashes which keeps the game from receiving a full score.
    It's a beautiful game with the correct "next gen" graphics that you would expect.
  14. Gossuke
    Nov 13, 2013
    7
    um grande jogo, mas, lançaram um jogo Beta ao invés do jogo oficial. O Beta jogado estava melhor que o jogo final, ou seja o beta deixaram legal para vender o jogo. FAIL isso. Espero uma solução em breve para o melhor jogo FPS
  15. smuniz83
    Dec 6, 2013
    6
    Battlefield 4 hardly seems like an improvement but the game is still fun to play if your one of the few not experiencing any problems. On PC, or on mine at least, the graphics look really good. Better than the their current gen console counterparts though I can't talk for next gen since I've yet to experience it.

    Campaign: What can I say.... it just sucks. We all know the campaign in    Battlefield 4 hardly seems like an improvement but the game is still fun to play if your one of the few not experiencing any problems. On PC, or on mine at least, the graphics look really good. Better than the their current gen console counterparts though I can't talk for next gen since I've yet to experience it.

    Campaign: What can I say.... it just sucks. We all know the campaign in these games are usually not good and this game is an example of that. Most of the time you can hardly care less about what's going on and you'll just want to get through the campaign already. To make matters worse, the devs decided to put some multiplayer unlockables in the campaign, meaning you have to play it if you want certain items or guns in the multiplayer. The story itself is just boring and part of that is how you, the main character, is poorly done. You never talk during the game which would be fine if you weren't the squad leader for the majority of the game. Often times you'll get scenes like a commander saying, "I'll answer to the squad leader only" and yet your companions will end up doing the talking for you like your a new trainee just learning the ropes and following along yet your suppose to be veteran and the leader.

    Multiplayer: Of you've played Battlefield 3 then you'll know what to expect. Same classes are there though some items have been mixed around. Really like that they added stats to the weapons and actually categorized so if you want a submachine gun you can just go to that. One big drawback that I don't understand why they didn't add it to the game is being able to customize your loadout while waiting for the next game. It doesn't make sense to do it while playing since you rather be playing and helping out your team rather than take time to change your loadout when you could've done it before the game started. The maps are pretty well done though, ranging from big vehicle maps to smaller no vehicles map yet big enough to accommodate a 32 and even 64 man matches.

    Biggest problem so far that everyone is mad about are the bugs and crashes that happened during launch. It is really unacceptable especially considering that they've had to delayed their first DLC, though I don't know why there's already a DLC, but the fact that it's been delayed shows how not ready the game was from being released. I can only recommend this game if you manage to get it for cheap like I did for 20$ and if your into FPS were sometimes you just want to jump in and experience some high action shooting.    … Expand
  16. phobos1985
    Nov 19, 2013
    7
    I dont get why everyone is bashing this game. It is a good game offering a wide variety for the MP FPS player. Anyone who knows BF knows that the SP is just a coaster disc, and while there are some bug issues currently with server disconnects those will we be worked out with subsequent patches. And lets face it all PC releases suffer from balancing and tech issues.

    So with all that    I dont get why everyone is bashing this game. It is a good game offering a wide variety for the MP FPS player. Anyone who knows BF knows that the SP is just a coaster disc, and while there are some bug issues currently with server disconnects those will we be worked out with subsequent patches. And lets face it all PC releases suffer from balancing and tech issues.

    So with all that being said those are the only two reasons why I gave this game a 7 vs 10. There is a ton of fun to be had here and i have thoroughly enjoyed mowing down my enemies in MP. With the new customization options soldier classes are the most diverse they ever have been. The game is beautiful as well and level design is unique and fun. but it does fall short of some of the BF3 maps like metro, and seine. With that being Said DICE has a long track record of providing map packs for its games, and soon the most popular Bf3 maps will be brought to this game on the new frostbite 3 engine.

    Don't listen to all the whiners this is a good game and while it may need some patch work to make it great. it's def worth picking up and spending countless of criminal hours mowing down everyone in your path    … Expand
  17. Hexadecimale
    Nov 23, 2013
    6
    Bf4, the new franchise will be a dream to many new comers, an elegant adaption to BF2 user base, and potentially new to bf3 users except for some map modes.
    Levolution works and works well
    The wrong for gamers and bf3 users going bf4 is simple: 1) Bf4 is not a visual stunt and realism compared to bf3 in ultra max settings. 2) Some maps in Bf4 are empty! you look at Parcels, you look    Bf4, the new franchise will be a dream to many new comers, an elegant adaption to BF2 user base, and potentially new to bf3 users except for some map modes.
    Levolution works and works well

    The wrong for gamers and bf3 users going bf4 is simple:
    1) Bf4 is not a visual stunt and realism compared to bf3 in ultra max settings.
    2) Some maps in Bf4 are empty! you look at Parcels, you look at Shangai. They are empty, sure you have effects like flying paper all around or you can swim under water weewwwwww, cool heh? yet nothing compared to realism of BF3. I do not blame Dice for their choice but console manufacturers to force developers to get to their best with crunched down ultra minimal hardware possible.
    3)Yes the game is really expensive, what you call premium is just BF4 with all expansion attached and ready to download when each of these expansion will be available. yet or +$100 compared to 1 year, 1 year and half and bf4 premium drops at 40$ altogether because well gamers are going other horizons and also Dice may want to "annualize" their franchise then what of this 100 dollars worth? just the right to be called premium since beginning with or without all expansions out already.

    Now the good:
    1) The engine seems and appear to diffuse scatter light a bit better in SOME situations compared to bf3 such as the locker room when you go in/out of the indoor tunnel and you get somewhat blinded and everything become contrasty. The engine needs a tweak for that whereas when you stop in the middle if this light diffuse and scattering then the changes stops where they are at and sometime remain as long as you stay on spot instead of diminishing as human eye adapt to light change after a short period of time. Sometime it works well, sometime it does not but those are fixes that will come along the way and it will be something plush and plus to the gameplay and game.
    2) Physx works well if not better than bf3
    3)Introduction of hide behind a box and pop to shoot. It is not perfect but fixes will come along.

    Conclusion:
    It could have been great and limited itself. Overall a good game but not worth +100$    … Expand
  18. VonHetzer
    Nov 29, 2013
    5
    I loved BF1942 and Bad Company 2. BF3 was a buggy title and the broken Origin dependency was another layer of junk. Yeah BF3 got better with patches but WHY. Now BF4 is out with all it's problems. It's become "what level of incomplete can we sell to these suckers before we loose our franchise" BF3 when it worked was the first Battlefield game that started me thinking. "These guys don'tI loved BF1942 and Bad Company 2. BF3 was a buggy title and the broken Origin dependency was another layer of junk. Yeah BF3 got better with patches but WHY. Now BF4 is out with all it's problems. It's become "what level of incomplete can we sell to these suckers before we loose our franchise" BF3 when it worked was the first Battlefield game that started me thinking. "These guys don't care". Now BF4 is apparently following in BF3's footsteps. I'm sure BF4 will be great game a year from now, assuming there is support. As for BF5 once bitten twice shy. Maybe I'll buy BF5 after all the patches and the price is down to $19.99… Expand
  19. Arktek
    Nov 30, 2013
    5
    It is a fun (though frustrating) game... when it doesn't freeze or crash. At the time of this writing I think I have about 15-20% of my games freezing or crashing. Though this is better than the ~50% at launch time, it's still inexcusable for a "finished" product.
  20. SpiritualHog
    Dec 1, 2013
    6
    Improved gun-play over BF3 and slightly better visuals with well designed maps make this a nice buy. On the downside, you have to go online to play single player and the servers aren't very stable. The game also have frequent crashes which set back progress. This would be an 8 or 9 if these issues were not present.
  21. Schmidy
    Jan 19, 2014
    7
    The only problem that I have with BF4 is that I cannot play the singleplayer campaign due to the game crashing, while I do have that problem with multiplayer it happens after several hours of gameplay. I really enjoy playing in multiplayer which makes up for the lack of singleplayer.
  22. UltraBjarne
    Dec 30, 2013
    5
    Battlefield 4 is not the exactly the best shooter out there, but its not the worst either. Most of the content you are paying 60$ for are things you can get from the games prequel, Battlefield 3, which costs 1/4 of the price. The new content are mostly tweaks and small additions to the customization. The gun mechanics are significantly dumbed down, and you will often find yourself gettingBattlefield 4 is not the exactly the best shooter out there, but its not the worst either. Most of the content you are paying 60$ for are things you can get from the games prequel, Battlefield 3, which costs 1/4 of the price. The new content are mostly tweaks and small additions to the customization. The gun mechanics are significantly dumbed down, and you will often find yourself getting killed in an instant and that the weapons are overall a bit unbalanced, with the DMR's and the shotguns being absolutely useless compared to the automatic weapons.

    The new gun mechanics are easier to pick up, but make the game significantly more shallow. However, there are many new customization options that can prolong the lifetime of the multiplayer. Vehicles remain mostly the same, but the addition of attack jets to conquest and obliteration gamemodes have rendered the so-called "anti-air" jets completely useless.

    As for the singleplayer, it has a forgettable storyline and dull shooting sequences. It wont take you more than 3-4 hours to complete it and there are plenty of bugs, just like the multiplayer

    The graphics are decent, but just like in Battlefield 3, the color scheme is quite dull.

    The game isn't worth 60$, but it's still an OK game.    … Expand
  23. dalew101
    Dec 31, 2013
    5
    This game felt like a typical Call of Duty release. There were slight increases in the graphics engine and new content was added. I also took part in the exclusive beta at 4AM in the morning and there was lag aglore on my GTX 680. Even now the game is filled with bugs and glitches that are not being fixed promptly. The Battlefield gameline has always separated itself far from Call of DutyThis game felt like a typical Call of Duty release. There were slight increases in the graphics engine and new content was added. I also took part in the exclusive beta at 4AM in the morning and there was lag aglore on my GTX 680. Even now the game is filled with bugs and glitches that are not being fixed promptly. The Battlefield gameline has always separated itself far from Call of Duty but now it's settling for average and not excelling for the best that hardcore PC gamers demand.… Expand
  24. CptStuhlgang
    Jan 4, 2014
    6
    It's a great game, but It's definitley not the game we've been waiting for. The singleplayer is nothing special, nevertheless there are some impressive moments and sometimes I really enjoyed the campaign, although the story isn't really a fascinating one. However, the multiplayer is way better than singleplayer. I know a lot of people still got problems with bugs etc., but I could play theIt's a great game, but It's definitley not the game we've been waiting for. The singleplayer is nothing special, nevertheless there are some impressive moments and sometimes I really enjoyed the campaign, although the story isn't really a fascinating one. However, the multiplayer is way better than singleplayer. I know a lot of people still got problems with bugs etc., but I could play the game from the beginning without any problems. I really appreciate the changes DICE did (new attachments, scoring for damaging vehicles, light switches, Commander Mode, but the map design could be better (for instants "Operation Locker" a.k.a. "Metro 2.0"). Sometimes it's impossible to play Rush, because a lot of maps enable baserape (but this is a problem we already got in Battlefield 3 and for this the players are to blame), although the map offers more than two ways to get to the objective. At least Battlefield 4 comes with an impressive graphic and levolution is a great feature, which is able to change a whole match.
    Eventually, it's a good game, which would be even better if almost everyone could play this game without any bugs etc., but I don't agree with people who say it's just a Battlefield 3 DLC, because it's not.    … Expand
  25. Fixtic
    Jan 5, 2014
    6
    Single-player is like what you would expect from multi-player based shooter. But the multi-player however is 60%copy from the battlefield 3, but there is some new things too like good old commander mode from battlefield 2 levolutions and new maps, but thats about it. but the game is unplayable without a good team, if your team sucks you are gonna lose, but the game is 20% better when youSingle-player is like what you would expect from multi-player based shooter. But the multi-player however is 60%copy from the battlefield 3, but there is some new things too like good old commander mode from battlefield 2 levolutions and new maps, but thats about it. but the game is unplayable without a good team, if your team sucks you are gonna lose, but the game is 20% better when you are playing with friends. there is some bad things like glitches and horrible netcode. This game doesn't bring so much new stuff but it is still enjoyable. i gave this 6 because

    +good maps +commander mode +good game-modes

    -very noob friendly, less skill based netcode and other glitches -bad campaign -almost same as battlefield 3    … Expand
  26. SuomiSoldat
    Jan 7, 2014
    7
    The game is loads of fun, like all the Battlefields since BF2. Especially played with a friend.

    Yes the game still has some major problems, which will frustrate you, but most of the time it'll be worth the mild frustration... but I don't mean that EA/Dice shouldn't fix the issues, they really owe it for the players. The players have paid for a finished game. I agree with the people    The game is loads of fun, like all the Battlefields since BF2. Especially played with a friend.

    Yes the game still has some major problems, which will frustrate you, but most of the time it'll be worth the mild frustration... but I don't mean that EA/Dice shouldn't fix the issues, they really owe it for the players. The players have paid for a finished game.

    I agree with the people saying that the game feels sometimes like Battlefield 3.5, but some improvements have been done. Sounds are better, graphics also mildly and the guns behave more realistically.

    Problems this game still has:
    -Random crashes every now and then
    -Sometimes it's a pain in the ass to get to a server, since the service is not working properly
    -Hit detection sometimes drags behind. You run to the cover, get there and die from a shot that should have hit you earlier, if it was going to

    Another annoyance is the battlepacks... You're unlocking a weapons utilities, and sometimes you just can't know what you'll get, and quite often the random unlocks just prove to be completely useless...

    But all these things aside, the actual gameplay is still nice.    … Expand
  27. wownd10405
    Feb 17, 2014
    7
    Great quality, best geuraepikneun I can admit that. But the story was too much. Compared to previous work, but still like the heart has not changed too unfortunate.
  28. CptAhnungslos
    Jan 18, 2014
    7
    Hm, I´m not a multiplayer fan so that part doesn´t bothers me.
    The campaign is a little short and quite boring. There are some parts that are intriguing and a lot of that don´t.
    For me it´s a playable benchmark/stresstool ;)
    What I really love are the graphics, the animations and the rudimentary ballistics.
  29. Circadia
    Feb 14, 2014
    7
    Despite some issues regarding stability, Battlefield 4 is a lot of fun. It improves on many of the gameplay elements of Battlefield 3. It's not a radical departure from 3 rather is more of the same but refined. While gameplay is improved in 4, I will argue that the level designs in 4 are inferior to 3. I had said on several occasions to friends that the best would've been a fusion of 4Despite some issues regarding stability, Battlefield 4 is a lot of fun. It improves on many of the gameplay elements of Battlefield 3. It's not a radical departure from 3 rather is more of the same but refined. While gameplay is improved in 4, I will argue that the level designs in 4 are inferior to 3. I had said on several occasions to friends that the best would've been a fusion of 4 gameplay with 3 maps. I have noted since then that one of the expansions is an import of favorite maps from 3 into 4. I wonder if this decision was inspired by similar feedback concerning level design for 4. Overall, lots of online fun to be had, and those really epic moments of a massive blast you survived, the perfect kill, or a well oiled squad keep you coming back for more.… Expand
  30. tgundel
    Feb 17, 2014
    6
    Great game, but too f***ing scarred by bugs and crashes. Atm I can't play two matches in a row without it freezing and entering a sound loop. It's f***ing terrible!
    They upped the game-play from BF3, but most of the maps are not very good for all game modes, and Rush for example has taken a huge hit to groin from BF3.
    I love it when I can play it without any issues, but the bugs and    Great game, but too f***ing scarred by bugs and crashes. Atm I can't play two matches in a row without it freezing and entering a sound loop. It's f***ing terrible!
    They upped the game-play from BF3, but most of the maps are not very good for all game modes, and Rush for example has taken a huge hit to groin from BF3.
    I love it when I can play it without any issues, but the bugs and crashes, which are never fixed, because EA, leaves this game nowhere near a perfect score and can only land it at 6 in my opinion!    … Expand
  31. re1tar
    Feb 24, 2014
    6
    I waited a new bf and hoped she would be like bf:bad company 2, Yes she got completely as bf:bad company 2 , system requirements and video don't match ,the graphics are by and large as in the above play,FACEPALM multiplayer almost not changed , the company itself brad Hollywood scriptwriter,in General, better bf3 , the overall score of 6 out of 10 (1.5 from 2.5 per the schedule of 0.5 2.5I waited a new bf and hoped she would be like bf:bad company 2, Yes she got completely as bf:bad company 2 , system requirements and video don't match ,the graphics are by and large as in the above play,FACEPALM multiplayer almost not changed , the company itself brad Hollywood scriptwriter,in General, better bf3 , the overall score of 6 out of 10 (1.5 from 2.5 per the schedule of 0.5 2.5 for the company of 2.5 2.5 multiplayer , 1.5 from 2.5 atmosphere )… Expand
  32. Officerjmiller
    Apr 1, 2014
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. WOO bf4 bf4 bf4!!!!! That is what I said when I was installing the game, and then the crashes started. I've had this game since release and until now I have been a blind EA/Dice fanboy telling myself that, "Oh, they will fix the crashing, Oh, every game starts out buggy and glitchy" But it has been 6 MONTHS.....6 MONTHS AND I STILL CANNOT JOIN THE DAMN MULTIPLAYER WITHOUT THE CONSTANT CRASHES. I bought premium that costed 80$ I can understand if this is a 15 indie game developed by a schizophrenic cat, but a multimillion/billion company? Unacceptable.

    The game is damn fun when you can play it, the guns sound and feel good, the vehicles (when they are not glitching and teleporting around from bugs) are fun to play around with, the counter knifing is awesome :D, the maps are varied and fun to play around in, and the levolution is pretty and at times can change the whole course of the match. The graphics...we don't need to talk about them...you all know.

    The game is very fun and i like it alot, but the blatant lack of finishing the game and very bad attempts at fixing it, bumped your score down to a 5. THIS IS IN APRIL 2014....AND YOU STILL HAVENT FIXED IT. The last "update" now doesnt even let me join the game. Solid job guys.    … Expand
  33. RangerRivet
    Apr 13, 2014
    7
    This game is amazing. Everyone whines because they have to actually WORK to get their guns, and work for their vehicles, hell, they WANT a pay to win model. Battlefield isn't about that, battlefield is about playing for long periods. I will agree, they need to work on disconnect problems and I agree that unlocking could go a little faster, but 99% of the people who are whining with theirThis game is amazing. Everyone whines because they have to actually WORK to get their guns, and work for their vehicles, hell, they WANT a pay to win model. Battlefield isn't about that, battlefield is about playing for long periods. I will agree, they need to work on disconnect problems and I agree that unlocking could go a little faster, but 99% of the people who are whining with their 0/10 review simply get killed all the time and blame the game. That's the bottom line.… Expand
  34. KillMessiah
    Sep 18, 2016
    5
    One of the most underwhelming, flat out bad SP experiences I have played in a long time. Tons of problems like constantly being forced out of the way where you are standing because NPC's very often have to move where you are standing no matter where it is. Friendly AI stand there and watch while enemies run by firing at them and they do nothing, These are just a couple of problems.

    MP    One of the most underwhelming, flat out bad SP experiences I have played in a long time. Tons of problems like constantly being forced out of the way where you are standing because NPC's very often have to move where you are standing no matter where it is. Friendly AI stand there and watch while enemies run by firing at them and they do nothing, These are just a couple of problems.

    MP was alright though.    … Expand
  35. King_Scorpion
    Nov 10, 2014
    7
    Great multiplayer. Poor Short campaign. Stunning visuals and graphic. The sound is great and realistic. You can experience huge battles in great BF multiplayer. the biggest problem of the game is bug.
  36. Ripplecry
    Dec 3, 2016
    6
    Genelde bu tür oyunların hayatta kalma ve hikaye kısımlarını seven, 3-4 kişilik seçkin bir tim ile kahramanca çarpışmayı keyifle icra eden biriyim. bu yüzdendir ki cod mw 1-2-3'te nice çılgın atmalar yaşadık john başgan, nikolai ve maktıraviş ile.

    Bu oyunun bütçesi nedir, kimler yönetmiştir, kaç mühendis çalışmıştır bilmiyorum; olmamış da demek istemiyorum böyle güzel bir emeğe, lakin    Genelde bu tür oyunların hayatta kalma ve hikaye kısımlarını seven, 3-4 kişilik seçkin bir tim ile kahramanca çarpışmayı keyifle icra eden biriyim. bu yüzdendir ki cod mw 1-2-3'te nice çılgın atmalar yaşadık john başgan, nikolai ve maktıraviş ile.

    Bu oyunun bütçesi nedir, kimler yönetmiştir, kaç mühendis çalışmıştır bilmiyorum; olmamış da demek istemiyorum böyle güzel bir emeğe, lakin sıkıcı olmuş. ara sahnelerde öldüm sıkıntıdan. Hikaye kopuk, ne için ve niye savaştığımızı bile pek bilmiyoruz. sadece tipik amerikan tarzı dünya görüşüyle, kime neden saldırdığımızı bilmeden bize karşı olan herkesi öldürüp üslerini ele geçirmek için yetiştirilmiş binlerce askerden birkaçıyız bu oyunda.Cod'da öyle değil ama, her şeyin bir nedeni ve operasyonların bir karizması, ağırlığı var. operasyonların sonunda elde ettiğimiz şeyler verdiğimiz kayıplara değiyor. Lakin üzülerek söylüyorum ki bu oyunda böyle bir şey yok.

    Takdir etmek gerekir ki, bireysel çatışmalardaki silah sesleri ile aksamları ve öldürme hadisesi çok gerçekçi olmuş. Hele kaliteli bir kulakiçi kulaklığınız varsa oradaymışçasına oyunun atmosferine kapılıveriyorsunuz. Sıktığınız asker önce dengesini kaybediyor, silahınızın gücüne ve nişan kabiliyetinize göre de bir veya iki kurşun sonra düşman ölüyor. Bunu resmen alkışladım pc başında, çok başarılı.
    Ama söylemeden geçilmemesi gerekiyor ki, ekibiniz hiçbir işe yaramıyor çatışmada. Kaldı ki tüm düşman askerleri sadece size sıkıyor, kafanızı dahi kaldırmak güçleşiyor. Ekip arkadaşlarınız bir halta yaramadığı gibi, güvenemiyorsunuz da hiçbirine.

    Bu tür ölüm-kalım mücadelelerinde sırtınızı yasladığınız adamlara güvenmeniz çok önemlidir. Örneğin tarihteki bazı savaşlarda 10-20 bin kişilik sağlam bir ordunun 40-80 bin arasındaki düşman ordusunu eze eze mağlup etmesi gibi. Bu ordudaki personelin cesaretine, yeteneklerine ve daha da önemlisi birbirlerine güvenine bağlıdır. Ama bu oyunda bu yok. fazla hümanist ve doğruları daima uygulayan bir irish, cool görünen ama bir halta yaramayan pac, dost mu düşman mı belli olmayan çinli bir kızla beraber savaşıyorsunuz.

    Cod'da bu böyle değil. ne kadar zor durumda olursanız olun, durumun farkında olup size moral vermeye çalışan başgan pırays'ın "haydi millet bitiriyoruz"vari söylemiyle kendinize gelip çılgınlar atabiliyorsunuz. daima sizi gözeten bir büyük abiniz varmışçasına. veya soap'ın profesyonel nişancılığına kendinizi emanet edip 5 askerin arasına korkusuzca dalabiliyorsunuz. ve ne kadar kapana kısılmış olursanız olun, nikolai'nin bir yerlerden bir helikopterle gelip sizi oradan alacağını biliyorsunuz. takım arkadaşlığı önemlidir.

    tıpkı maradona'nın topun nereye atılacağını hissetmiş gibi ardına bakmadan pasın geleceği yere koşup attığı o efsanevi gol gibi.
    sorduklarında "oraya atacağını biliyordum" derken, hissediyorsunuz o takım ruhunu, bir olmayı.

    Tüm bunları göz önüne aldım ve amaçsız şekilde ilerleyişten sıkılıp, az önce tamamladıktan sonra oyunu sildim. Çatışmalardan keyif almakla beraber, 20 metre ötedeki adama tankın otomatik tüfeğiyle defalarca sıkıp öldürememek de nedir? Geçiyor ağacın arkasına ve ölmüyor eşek kadar mermilerle ağaç yıpranmıyor. tank var yahu altınızda, yuh! Oyunun eksikleri var ve bireysel çatışmalar hariç (onların da bazıları) keyif vermeyen bir oyun hikaye moduyla.

    Co-op multi oynamadım, ona güzel diyorlar. Belki bir gün, kim bilir...    … Expand
  37. Soullex
    Nov 30, 2022
    5
    3'ün aynısı ama çoğu COD oyunundan çok daha iyi............................
  38. Izoeros
    Apr 26, 2022
    7
    qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq
  39. yunusemre23023
    Oct 25, 2022
    5
    this game is very bad. It's swim mechanics worried. I don't like this. I think battlefield's other games more than this game.
  40. Schuback
    Mar 9, 2016
    6
    I'm not a huge fps gamer. In fact I can't remember when was the last time I played one. I did play Duke Nukem, Medal of Honor in the old days... Anyway, decided to give BF4 a try after watching some trailers and man them graphics look awesome. Bought it day one.Took almost a day to download this game and finally.....

    This game has one of the best graphics in an fps I've ever seen.    I'm not a huge fps gamer. In fact I can't remember when was the last time I played one. I did play Duke Nukem, Medal of Honor in the old days... Anyway, decided to give BF4 a try after watching some trailers and man them graphics look awesome. Bought it day one.Took almost a day to download this game and finally.....

    This game has one of the best graphics in an fps I've ever seen. Comparing to it's biggest rival COD, BF4 blows COD out of the freaking water (at least in terms of the graphics)!! The second plus for this game is the factions. Now you also get to play as China! No longer is it going to be America vs AlQaeda this AlQaeda that... America vs Russia. Same sh*t... Now you get something so fresh. Join China and shoot Americans lol. This is what I'd like to see. Different perspectives =)

    Ok, besides graphics and factions, I'd say the shooting mechanics are well done too. The story mode is too scripted and linear but nobody plays it anyway so I won't judge the game by its sp. Overall, Battlefield 4 is a decent shooter with one striking problem that all shooters suffer from. The repetitiveness omgg!! You run, you gun, you camp, you capture locations, you get shot, and you wake up again. Over and over. So in 2 hours you'll be doing the same thing. After 4 hours, still the same...And after 10 hours. mate, it's just the same over and over. I mean, how long do you expect anyone to be doing this?? There's no strategy involved, no cooperation with teammates, no creativity, it's blind and mindless shooting. Lots of people are into that these days. WELL NOT ME!!! Not going to buy an fps anytime soon. And this game was released back in 2013!!    … Expand
  41. CaptainMushroom
    Jul 13, 2014
    7
    Battlefield 4 is the sequel to the game Battlefield 4 which shook up the FPS genre and made room for competition. Sadly enough Battlefield 4 lacks at certain moments, the singleplayer was made without much thought and contains game-breaking bugs here and there. The multiplayer is OK, but is also buggy, and worse than BF3's multiplayer. I liked the underwater areas in MP though. There is noBattlefield 4 is the sequel to the game Battlefield 4 which shook up the FPS genre and made room for competition. Sadly enough Battlefield 4 lacks at certain moments, the singleplayer was made without much thought and contains game-breaking bugs here and there. The multiplayer is OK, but is also buggy, and worse than BF3's multiplayer. I liked the underwater areas in MP though. There is no obvious graphical inprovement, so you are better off sticking to Battlefield 3. Also, there's no 32bit support for older machines.… Expand
  42. Banhammer0
    Aug 12, 2014
    6
    Decent.
    While it's visually stunning and has a lot of content in store it has many HUGE flaws.
    For one, it's basically HALF of a game until you decide to pay for premium (which is 50 euroes I think). Second it has ridiculously slow gridny leveling (and unlocking) forcing you to buy premium (more unlocks) or pay for unlocks (another ~40 euroes). In 6 weeks of playing it I have unlocked    Decent.
    While it's visually stunning and has a lot of content in store it has many HUGE flaws.
    For one, it's basically HALF of a game until you decide to pay for premium (which is 50 euroes I think).
    Second it has ridiculously slow gridny leveling (and unlocking) forcing you to buy premium (more unlocks) or pay for unlocks (another ~40 euroes). In 6 weeks of playing it I have unlocked maybe 1/4 of what it has to offer (or buy).
    Third it's just not really fun. That's the biggest flaw. All the weapons are clones of each other. Maps are boring with map destruction being crap (fun to look at but it's actually a detriment to gameplay).
    Vehicles own everything and there is still no system for assigning them to players, so you have to camp for it and get lucky if you want one.
    Voice acting is surprisingly **** bad. Sound effects are pretty good, and like mentioned above graphics are of the highest possible quality, inducing erection in you for a few weeks until you get used to it.

    Nah for me it's a good game ruined by massive greed, just another one to add to EA's **** titles list.
    6/10    … Expand
  43. ns0l
    Aug 11, 2014
    7
    The expectations were high, because it looks amazing on the videos. Can my PC handle that game? Well the multiplayer is amazing, but the campaign is something to forget.
  44. R00TKILL
    Apr 4, 2014
    6
    Things are getting better in this game, some improvements are being made but I still think BF3 still takes the lead fair and square on the User Ratings. I have two things on my mind that could vastly improve the gameplay and that's 1. Balance the AIR,GROUND,SEA Vehicles/Planes. 2. Give us some better guns, I mean you have the AK's covered for sure but the AR game is mucked up, the M4Things are getting better in this game, some improvements are being made but I still think BF3 still takes the lead fair and square on the User Ratings. I have two things on my mind that could vastly improve the gameplay and that's 1. Balance the AIR,GROUND,SEA Vehicles/Planes. 2. Give us some better guns, I mean you have the AK's covered for sure but the AR game is mucked up, the M4 shoots only Semi and Burst... wtf is that! They always put a stupid HK416 piston gun in the game for once put a LWRC M6 varient or even a LMT MRP, If your going to go Direct Impingement go Noveske or KAC. Other than that they still has some issues with hackers and getting hung up on broken tree stumps and collapsed buildings is a new annoying things to deal with.… Expand
  45. Cloudom
    Dec 11, 2014
    7
    DICE stuck to their roots with Battlefield 4. The game felt like a pretty fresh experience, at least for an FPS, that was until I realised how unfinished the game is.

    First, this game is flawed. The gameplay is good, the maps are very hit and miss, but generally very enjoyable and the graphics are very nice. However, DICE have thrown the game out into the public with a lot of broken    DICE stuck to their roots with Battlefield 4. The game felt like a pretty fresh experience, at least for an FPS, that was until I realised how unfinished the game is.

    First, this game is flawed. The gameplay is good, the maps are very hit and miss, but generally very enjoyable and the graphics are very nice. However, DICE have thrown the game out into the public with a lot of broken strings that, even after 14 months after release, still haven't bothered to fix. Instead, they decide to waste time whining on how EA robbed them while releasing mediocre DLC's that most people do not care for. This game is technically good and my negative views on it may be seen as nit-picking, but trust me, it is not. Many times I have had to give up playing due to problems that have overly complicated fixes that numerous purchasers have become victim to.

    Despite this, the game is pretty much everything it looks on the outside. Its your typical addicting, eye candy military shooter. I admit that I didn't play the campaign but after Battlefield 3 it was clear where the ambition was, which is the multiplayer. If you know anything about modern FPS game's you probably know how the successful Battlefield formula works. Each map has typically about 32 to 64 slots, depending on the gamemode. The most popular gamemode is the conquest gamemode where two opposing sides must hold as different points of the map as they can to decrease the amount of tickets lost, the first team to reach 0 tickets loses. The maps are large and look stunning. As previously mentioned the map designs are very hit and miss. Some maps are very well designed, such as the brilliant Siege of Shanghai, a typical city map separated by the incredibly large and well designed skyscraper in the middle. This maps standouts out as it accomplishes the feeling of challenge when trying to capture or defend each point, all of which are very well designed. However, even this map if flawed after the skycraper falls as a 'levelution' which definitely was a poor design choice. The desert/warehouse setting of Zavod is also an excellent map which held some of my most intense and fondest moments of playing these games. These aside, BF4 suffers from a lot of poor map design, ranging from the messy and incomplete Hainan Resort to the claustrophobic and dull Operation Locker. The maps really don't balance out and the brilliant maps do not make up for the embarrassingly shocking ones.

    The new content is also limited. Not much feels new, this may be a bit unfair since I did not play Battlefield 3 that much, but I felt as though I wasn't getting my $90 worth playing it. This point feels a bit unfair as it's pretty much what's expected for a sequel to a successful multiplayer FPS but its jump from its predecessor feels small compared to what BF3 did from BF2.

    As negative as this review may feel, I actually had quite a blast playing this game. It definitely won't a game I see myself coming back to in the near future but it served it purpose well in delivery a fast paced, gorgeous FPS that I can see fans enjoying. For me however, the games bugs and numerous problems make the game more frustrating than it should be.    … Expand
  46. Iimonster297
    Apr 23, 2014
    7
    A huge fan of Battlefield franchise is frustrated from Battlefield 4 speaking to his heart. I couldn't encounter perfect applies of the previous Battlefields. Battlefield 4 contains technical problems-bugs, poor service, mechanics cannot fit to Battlefield 4's benefits.
  47. Teers98
    Apr 2, 2014
    7
    Battlefield 4 has an awesome Multiplayer but it's not as good as Battlefield 3. It has great Graphics but the Campaign is **** because EA just produced the Game for the Multiplayer. Of course, the Multiplayer is great but next time they should really make a better Story! Anyway it's a great game but as i said, not as good as Battlefield 3 in my Opinion.
  48. Infaereld
    Apr 12, 2014
    7
    Good points: Fun, challenging, lots of maps, destructive environment and weapon/vehicle selection good.
    Bad points: Lack of variety in game modes during online play, still buggy, can't see much progress since BF3.
    Overall an enjoyable experience but still much of the same.
  49. Drastre
    Apr 28, 2014
    7
    A fun and enjoyable enough military shooter. The campaign is suprisingly decent but, the thing you buy Battlefield multiplayer. It is fun but, it lags too often which is a big issue. Overall, good game.
  50. JIELM
    May 21, 2014
    7
    The Positives:

    This game is a fun cruize from the wonder the 3rd gave us. The weapons feels better and its more fun to unlock new ones, contrasting the 3rd game where i lost track of my unlocks at level 70. On top of that, the amount of customisations have been grately fleshed out. The weapons feels more personal as a result, which is a great improvement. The levolution is amazing, much    The Positives:

    This game is a fun cruize from the wonder the 3rd gave us. The weapons feels better and its more fun to unlock new ones, contrasting the 3rd game where i lost track of my unlocks at level 70. On top of that, the amount of customisations have been grately fleshed out. The weapons feels more personal as a result, which is a great improvement. The levolution is amazing, much more fun than the (Lets be fair now) underwhelming destructables the third tried to blow us away with. The atmosphere is beautiful, not as good as the trailers made it out to be, but i can live with it. And its still much better than the third game, which always made me feel like having a sudden faint on a painfully bright summer day. Love the new cover mechanic, very usefull in tight corner situations, makes operation metro actually playable. The game constantly keeps you on your toes, 9 minutes each team deathmach makes the game easy to just pick upp and play 30 minutes before going to work

    The Negtatives:

    I absolutely HATE the constant crashes on dawnbraker, its simply a disaster thet these ones still happens 6 MONTHS AFTER ITS RELEASE!. But most of the negative aspects for me rests on the fact that this game underdelivers, considering its heritage. For example, (and this was a problem in the third game as well). The maps arent realy that big. Remember Bandar Desert in Battlefield 3? It was said to be the biggest map in battlefield history. My main point is, that that should be the OVERALL size of ALL the maps in both these games. Where did the MASSIVE areas that Battlefield 1942 gave us go? The game is called Battlefield! So where is the battleFIELDS?! On top of that, the conquests are way to short. A conquest lasts most times only 15 minutes. 15 MINUTES! What the hell! A Battlefield 1942 game could clock into over 40 minutes. A big letdown to those who hoped that the grapical wonders of this new game would go with the franchise an actually improve the game on all aspects

    This game is still a great shooter game. Its still fun to play. The weapons feels better and most of the gameplay mechanics are an improvement from the third game. The downside is the crashes that should have been fixed long ago, preferable BEFORE RELEASE. The maps are small compared to the older games. The music is still a load of farting noices barely recembeling the epic trumpet of battlefield 1942. And the maps is still way to small to overcome the feeling that game gave us. I know it's bold to compare this with so much older games, but my point is that this game should not be outowned by the old battlefield 1942 i ANY AREAS. Overall, a good, unfortunately underwhelming, shooter that keeps you on your toes and never gets boring to play.

    PS: In the 5th game, i expect to be able to control SHIP CRUIZERS! Don't disapoint me.    … Expand
  51. AlexanderMV
    Jun 14, 2014
    6
    Well, the price of the game still is very high for the real value, the graphics are oddly lower than Battlefield 3 ones, don't ask me why, and the scenarios and maps are not so detailed like in BF3, the loadings of the game are extremely long for no reason, and there are much more bugs in BF4, bugs that compromise the physics of the game, that are not so good too, the story is very simpleWell, the price of the game still is very high for the real value, the graphics are oddly lower than Battlefield 3 ones, don't ask me why, and the scenarios and maps are not so detailed like in BF3, the loadings of the game are extremely long for no reason, and there are much more bugs in BF4, bugs that compromise the physics of the game, that are not so good too, the story is very simple and direct with a short campaing of 4-5 hours, i personally liked the voice acting and the gameplay but the game leaves much to be desired, the game doesn't worth all the money that we paid, at least the developers are still trying to fix the game problems, some problems like the netcode have already been fixed. If the game is finally fixed i will rewrite this review. Thanks for the attention and sorry for my english.… Expand
  52. Karnivool
    Jun 21, 2014
    6
    Remember how good Battlefield 3 was? me too. Don't get me wrong, if you are looking for your fix of Battlefield or just an FPS in general, Battlefield 4 delivers that experience, very inconsistently.

    Still to this day you will join a server on BF4 and there will be players gliding across the screen due to a horrible connection, you will be piling bullets into peoples faces for them    Remember how good Battlefield 3 was? me too. Don't get me wrong, if you are looking for your fix of Battlefield or just an FPS in general, Battlefield 4 delivers that experience, very inconsistently.

    Still to this day you will join a server on BF4 and there will be players gliding across the screen due to a horrible connection, you will be piling bullets into peoples faces for them just to turn around and drop you like a sack of bricks.

    Now EA and DICE have rolled out patch after patch, steadily the game is getting better but still, to be this far into the game and still to have some major problems? that's unacceptable. The one thing you will notice though, is that all of these problems are server based.

    If you can get beyond the inconsistencies of the game connection, there is still a lot of fun to be had. The graphics are as usual, brilliant, the audio through-out the game is incredible, seriously, play a game of large conquest with some headphones on, I guarantee you, you may soil yourself. OK maybe not, but you get the jist of it.

    I gave Battlefield a 6/10 for a reason. Had I done this review a few months back, the score would of been a lot lower and you could possibly say that I could return to this review in a few months and the game will be worth a higher rating. I seriously doubt you will be disappointed if you are a Battlefield fan and you have yet to pick this up, the game still give you hours of entertainment, even more if you get a group of friends on.

    Just beware of those damn servers.    … Expand
  53. ClipState
    Nov 20, 2014
    7
    This game is not the game we expected. Sure it has its strengths in multiplayer but its single player campaign was just utterly disappointing. I didn't think they could actually make something worse in this game than its predecessor. The best part about the campaign was the hit markers and scoring. This at least gave it an arcade style feel to a campaign which wasn't even worth playing. ItThis game is not the game we expected. Sure it has its strengths in multiplayer but its single player campaign was just utterly disappointing. I didn't think they could actually make something worse in this game than its predecessor. The best part about the campaign was the hit markers and scoring. This at least gave it an arcade style feel to a campaign which wasn't even worth playing. It was bearable by all means but compared to BF3 or even Call of Duty, it falls horribly short. I found myself pushing my way through it just for the gamerscore. Moving on, the multiplayer was a big improvement. Not huge - but big enough to give it a new feel. The larger, more open maps made the game better. The weapons and customization options were pretty good but it still feels the same. The gameplay didn't take too much of a step forward. Still, overall its a fun game and people should still be playing it a lot for now.… Expand
  54. Xenitt
    Jul 20, 2014
    7
    Overall, I am fairly impressed with the new installment of the BF series, but it just barely makes a 7 out of 10. The game was executed very well, and some of the biggest innovation was to be found in multiplayer, particularly in vehicle combat. But even with some of the changes made, BF4 feels more like a DLC than anything.

    Sure, the graphics have been given a bit of a boost, and    Overall, I am fairly impressed with the new installment of the BF series, but it just barely makes a 7 out of 10. The game was executed very well, and some of the biggest innovation was to be found in multiplayer, particularly in vehicle combat. But even with some of the changes made, BF4 feels more like a DLC than anything.

    Sure, the graphics have been given a bit of a boost, and overall the gameplay feels great, but it doesn't even scratch the surface compared to BF3, when it comes to the campaign. While the campaign was enjoyable, it felt more driven by gameplay, and fast-paced action, rather than story. And, in the end, I couldn't remember anyone's name, or how it even ended. However, I digress, as I know not everyone is quite as into the campaign as I am.

    As far as multiplayer goes, I have only a few complaints, the main one is level design. The maps in BF4 are great, but they aren't quite as memorable as some of the maps from BF3, like Caspian Border, and Kharg Island among others. However, others may feel differently, this is my personal opinion, anyway.

    Lastly, I feel one of the main problems with the game, even now, is the netcode. I am no expert in netcode, but when 95% of my kills/deaths are due to crossfire, and getting shot around corners, we have a problem. I think this is something that Dice really needs to focus on, as it really is a game-killer.

    Overall, I would've given BF4 a higher score, but I am already being pretty generous, considering the fact that EA pushed this game out early, even though it wasn't even finished. And even to this day, it features a wide array of issues, which could have been avoided, given a little bit of extra time.    … Expand
  55. bdkn87
    Aug 20, 2014
    7
    This game was broken when it was first released. But now the netcode has been fixed so that hits register faster. It's starting to feel almost as smooth as CoD games when it comes to shooting. But better than CoD, on conquest this game is huge and relies on teamwork to win. There are tons of vehicles and a balanced team is really importance. But you can still play small infantry only mapsThis game was broken when it was first released. But now the netcode has been fixed so that hits register faster. It's starting to feel almost as smooth as CoD games when it comes to shooting. But better than CoD, on conquest this game is huge and relies on teamwork to win. There are tons of vehicles and a balanced team is really importance. But you can still play small infantry only maps and those are still fun. Play with five of your friends in a squad and there's no better gaming experience.

    But they really needed specific maps for Rush. It's so unbalanced, offense usually has no chance. Rush mode on BF3 was good, and Rush on BC2 was near perfect. Considering that Rush is my favorite mode, I was really disappointed.

    Overall, still a good game    … Expand
  56. leemanfor
    Sep 9, 2014
    7
    Having played around 250 hours of BF4 multiplayer, I feel I have a good view of the game.

    The Pros: Good choice of weapons Ability to use DMR/Shotgun/Carbine for any class Good graphics decent load times Large maps Large map choices The Cons: Netcode is still messed up Some weapons are overpowered. Plenty of bugs even after a year. Now, I only play Hardcore so I can't    Having played around 250 hours of BF4 multiplayer, I feel I have a good view of the game.

    The Pros:
    Good choice of weapons
    Ability to use DMR/Shotgun/Carbine for any class
    Good graphics
    decent load times
    Large maps
    Large map choices

    The Cons:
    Netcode is still messed up
    Some weapons are overpowered.
    Plenty of bugs even after a year.

    Now, I only play Hardcore so I can't really comment too much on the Normal version. but I feel that Battlefield 4 is a great first person shooter, that falls a bit short in some areas. Compared to its predecessor, BF3, Battlefield 4 doesn't stand out.    … Expand
  57. Supat97
    Jan 24, 2015
    7
    So Here My Break Down for BF4

    Story:5/10 In BF4 Your job would be much more difficult if the evil Russian and Chinese soldiers has learned a modicum of tactical awareness. But maybe the ease of which you pick them off and sneak by them is on purpose. They swarm as if they were pins at the end of a bowling ball lane, next to combustive barrels, no less. You create a wall of bullets and    So Here My Break Down for BF4

    Story:5/10
    In BF4 Your job would be much more difficult if the evil Russian and Chinese soldiers has learned a modicum of tactical awareness. But maybe the ease of which you pick them off and sneak by them is on purpose. They swarm as if they were pins at the end of a bowling ball lane, next to combustive barrels, no less. You create a wall of bullets and they keep walking into it, as if they were simply the catalysts for your explosive creations.But Sadly Campaign So Short And Uninteresting Like BF3 With Problem With AI Issue.

    Multiplayer 7/10
    Like BF3 This Thing Is a Selling Points Even without the 64-player count, the fact that every mode in BF4 has more players means there are more enemies for you to shoot at, more people to heal, and resupply you – and probably the most important part: people squatting on vehicles won’t bog down a match to molasses.

    Gameplay 8/10
    Graphics In BF4 Blow My Mind Gameplay and graphics are both beautiful and Sound So Realistic Even On Low-PC Gaming Spec

    Performance 6/10 (5.5 If Possible)
    Unfortunately,the most annoying and nasty issue that lots of players have been harping on about – and with good reason – is the game just not working as intended. By this, I mean, the big “Battlefield 4 Has Stop Working” crash that will boot you out of the game completely. Another issue related to this is Sever Crashing, booting you out of matches for no good reason, and the occasional Unbalanced Gameplay,Overpowered Weapon and Netcode Issue Mostly On PC.

    Final Verdict : 7.3/10
    The BF4 Is a My Great Shooters Of all Time Unfortunately With All Problem In BF4 As BF Hatred Bandwagon Grow Stronger In Fact DICE have thrown the game out into the public with a lot of broken strings that after 1 Years and 3 months after release DICE LA has fixed Most Problem it in the newest update. They really do their job well and are saving BF4 from being a buggy unbalanced disaster That Only Time Will Tells Fate of BF.    … Expand
  58. Nerocz1
    Dec 14, 2014
    6
    Campaign: Nice but completely unecessary add-on for BF4. In every location you have to kill every enemy just to move forward. This make this game campaign almost unplayable, i was discusted after 2 missions. No More of BF single-players please.
  59. brofenix
    Dec 6, 2014
    6
    No Capture the Flag mode by default :( Only with paid DLC can you get Capture the Flag, and this is the most fun mode in my opinion. Good game, taxing on computer so is a little laggy. In general, hard game I die quite a bit. Hard to get into on multiplayer, bleh will move to Guild Wars 2
  60. RealJPVBV
    Jan 21, 2015
    6
    I have played this game and it is very buggy. Random FPS spikes and weird glitches. I only played this game for multiplayer. I experience the long loading screens which takes somewhere around 1-3 mins. The worst part is the game breaking glitch which is when you join a match it disconnects you. You have to connect to the server 2-5 times in order to join a game. There is no fix for thisI have played this game and it is very buggy. Random FPS spikes and weird glitches. I only played this game for multiplayer. I experience the long loading screens which takes somewhere around 1-3 mins. The worst part is the game breaking glitch which is when you join a match it disconnects you. You have to connect to the server 2-5 times in order to join a game. There is no fix for this bug. I recommend to not expect a good time when playing this game on pc.… Expand
  61. gattienzo
    Jul 29, 2015
    6
    Más de lo mismo que el bf 3, con mapas menos memorables y con varios errores de jugabilidad como por ejemplo reaparecer en zonas no oportunas. Un modo historia aburrido y también con errores de jugabilidad.
  62. opengl
    Jun 25, 2016
    6
    The same solid formula has been used for this series for a while now. The level/building destruction is nice but as it plays out in the gameplay mechanics is still not a main feature and offers mostly cinematic value. Where as if someone was hiding behind a wall from your tank in the pre-destruction battlefield games the only difference now is that they will have to hide further back orThe same solid formula has been used for this series for a while now. The level/building destruction is nice but as it plays out in the gameplay mechanics is still not a main feature and offers mostly cinematic value. Where as if someone was hiding behind a wall from your tank in the pre-destruction battlefield games the only difference now is that they will have to hide further back or retreat behind another wall or object to gain protection. In a way this is balancing, but it still feels like there's not much point to leveling a building in BF 4.

    When it came out this game was a non functioning POS and even when it did function the servers would only update the clients 10 times a second which as it turns out is the worst thing you could do to a visceral FPS experience. EA titles should always be approached with caution knowing that their first priority is revenue and having a decent (or functioning) gaming experience is NOT a priority at all. The only reason it got fixed is because nobody would have bought their subsequent battlefield games if their last one was still broken 2 years after release.

    That said... today battlefield 4 is a polished functional and GOOD experience. The formula has been mostly graphically upgraded from BF 3 but the formula remains true. Unfortunately there has really not been enough innovation in modern mainstream video games to render this obsolete.

    So if you're looking for a FPS that involves large numbers of troops fighting as infantry and in vehicles, on good maps, includes some creative strategic thinking, with great graphics, and offers squad play as it's key dynamic its hard to go wrong with battlefield 4.

    The only thing to take note of is that you will encounter in almost any game, players who use cheats to see positions of other players. This is not the same as using the minimap. The most common type shows boxes around each enemy even behind walls and across the map. It is extremely obvious who these players are and often nothing is done about it. Because of this, I'm giving this game 1 point lower of a score. It cannot be overlooked however in the end it is not gamebreaking.    … Expand
  63. Mefisto_
    Jul 27, 2015
    6
    Quite a time has passed after the game release, and most of the issues are fixed by now. However, you can't escape the past and after all patches which have came out the core of the game can't be changed.

    So what is about it? There are so many gadgets and weapons in this game that around 40% I have not and would not use at all. Why? Because most of them are purposeless or there are    Quite a time has passed after the game release, and most of the issues are fixed by now. However, you can't escape the past and after all patches which have came out the core of the game can't be changed.

    So what is about it? There are so many gadgets and weapons in this game that around 40% I have not and would not use at all. Why? Because most of them are purposeless or there are other options of weapons of perks which are far superior to the rest of the content in the game.

    Map variation is OK, there are a lot of them and you certainly will find a couple which perfectly suit your style or preference.

    Graphics? Nothing too special, even though Shanghai tower falling looks really cool.

    Gameplay and stability? If you look back at the launch state, this game was absolute crap, as I was spending on average 10-15 minutes looking for the server which was not crashing. Moreover, **** net code was adding fuel to the flame confirming that EA pretty much does not care about quality of the product at the release state.

    As I am writing this review now most of the issues were fixed and there are loads of people playing this game, as it is far more attractive than BF Hardline and most of the people are tired of BF 3.

    So, If I was writing this review in 2013, I would give 1-3 just because how bad this game was, but after 2 years passed even bunch of crappy programers could manage fixing big issues, therefore leaving BF 4 at OK state, still with problems like reload bug and unbalanced weapons present.    … Expand
  64. Asbest-Men
    Nov 11, 2015
    7
    Скучнейшая в мире сингл-кампания (в отличие от Колды даже кинца и падающих вертолётов нет). Сетевой режим только более глюченный стал. Изменений в графике мало. В общем-то игра неплохая, но по сути топтание на месте, больше простое использование наработок 3ей части не прокатит.Скучнейшая в мире сингл-кампания (в отличие от Колды даже кинца и падающих вертолётов нет). Сетевой режим только более глюченный стал. Изменений в графике мало. В общем-то игра неплохая, но по сути топтание на месте, больше простое использование наработок 3ей части не прокатит.
  65. wonderirani
    Nov 16, 2015
    7
    The was very good. Good graphics and smooth. the developers could work better in the story part mostly the end of the game was not i expected or could be. It was not good enough at the end could be very better but over all it was fun playing it and one more thing it was a short game.
  66. ChanandlerBong
    Jan 2, 2016
    5
    Had a lots of fun on this game but unfortunately with new patches and 'fixes' comes new bugs. Further more 'net code' sucks from day one. There has been 'fixes' for 'net code' but actually they didn't fix anything. What they did is nerf weapons damage so when someone starts shooting at you, you'll be able to notice it but there is still that one shot death present despite nerfs.
  67. Shadow1
    May 25, 2016
    6
    This game is worst game in series . In this game bad optimization, graphics almost like in BattleField 3 . In this game terrible gameplay and this game has got high requirements for such graphics . The only thing which is the average in this game this is storyline and it doesn't very good, just average . Bad Game .
  68. Detraxxx
    Mar 23, 2016
    7
    Fairly well done continuation of The Battlefield franchise, but is filled with bugs and lacks originality. The single player campaign is short but intense. The graphics and many great new maps put this FPS game slightly above average.
  69. matheus2cma
    Apr 13, 2016
    7
    Era pra ser o melhor Battlefield já feito, infelizmente ele foi lançado com dezenas de bugs, a DICE demorou um tempo pra corrigi-los, e conseguiu, deu a volta por cima trazendo até DLC's grátis. Mas o jogo acabou ficando muito mexido, a equipe se perdeu em tantos updates e alterações de gameplays. Outro ponto que BF4 pecou é o seu netcode, dezenas de problemas online, balanceamento deEra pra ser o melhor Battlefield já feito, infelizmente ele foi lançado com dezenas de bugs, a DICE demorou um tempo pra corrigi-los, e conseguiu, deu a volta por cima trazendo até DLC's grátis. Mas o jogo acabou ficando muito mexido, a equipe se perdeu em tantos updates e alterações de gameplays. Outro ponto que BF4 pecou é o seu netcode, dezenas de problemas online, balanceamento de time que nunca foi resolvido mesmo após várias tentativas. É sim um bom jogo, mas pra quem é fã antigo da série se decepcionou muito, vale a pena comprar, mas não vale perder muito tempo jogando, ainda mais com outros Battlefield's melhores ainda "vivos"… Expand
  70. Nihron
    Sep 24, 2022
    7
    +1 балл за фразу "давайте, вы будете выполнять свою работу, а я, блядь, буду командовать"
  71. Mobile
    Jun 20, 2018
    7
    ENG - RU
    In this review I will compare only the 3 and 4, the rest I do not know, and much sense to compare no, so it was better, and 4 of Raskin three-pointers.
    First of the story of the company: the worst "partners" in the history of shooters, such nonsense I have not seen anywhere else, if not marked enemies and thus did not give the order (press the Q button throughout the game),    ENG - RU
    In this review I will compare only the 3 and 4, the rest I do not know, and much sense to compare no, so it was better, and 4 of Raskin three-pointers.
    First of the story of the company: the worst "partners" in the history of shooters, such nonsense I have not seen anywhere else, if not marked enemies and thus did not give the order (press the Q button throughout the game), these idiots will just sit and watch, even if the enemy is right in front of them, the system will ignore them, as if they do not exist, that's the case. Pleased with the freedom, more cinematic, at least some companions (more or less with the character), the mission on the tank, shooting, pumping, collecting tokens. Overall nicer and more fun than a three-pointer.
    At the expense of multiplayer, in short: a lot of excess, almost everywhere, a lot of body kits that are duplicated or half is not used, but it's nice to open them, to get experience for them, to open the next case, to include the increase of experience, which just endlessly fall, although up to 100 rank, you can pump very quickly, do not compare Can't tell you where the best shooting, but a 4 if you compare the trunks of the 3, it seems that as it is easier without recoil, and generally if everything is too simplified, even with the machine gun, you don't need to broadcast the arm which significantly helped in 3, here is something else all.
    В данном отзыве буду сравнивать лишь 3 и 4 часть, остальные мне не знакомы, да и смысла особо сравнивать нет, так - как раньше было лучше, и 4 часть рескрин трешки.
    Сначала о сюжетной компании: самые худшие "напарники" за всю историю шутеров, такого бреда я еще не видел нигде, если бы не пометил врагов и тем самым не отдал приказ (прожимать кнопку Q на протяжении всей игры), то эти идиоты будут просто сидеть и смотреть, даже если враг прямо перед ними, система будет игнорировать их, будто их и не существует, вот такие дела. Порадовала свобода, больше киношности, хоть какие нибудь напарники (более менее с характером), миссия на танке, стрельба, прокачка, сбор жетонов. В целом приятней и веселей чем трешка.
    На счет мультиплеера, если коротко: то много лишнего, практически во всем, много обвесов, которые дублируются или половина вообще не используется, да их приятно открывать, получать за них опыт, открывать очередной кейс, включать повышения опыта, которые просто без конца валятся, хотя до 100 ранга, можно прокачаться очень быстро, не сравнить с 3 частью. Не могу сказать где лучше стрельба, но вот в 4 если сравнивать стволы из 3, то кажется что как то легче, без отдачи, и вообще будто все слишком упростили, даже с пулемета, не нужно вещать рукоятку которая, ощутимо помогала в 3, здесь как то иначе все.    … Expand
  72. Aspromixy
    Oct 22, 2022
    7
    sometimes I play multiplayer, I can play for a couple of hours, the servers are still open, the company is also quite interesting, I don't seem to see cheaters, people play in the evening, the servers are full, the sounds of firing weapons are chic, actually better than some modern shooters, the graphics too very pleasant, the game is like fine wine, it better with age
  73. Fany000
    Nov 10, 2018
    6
    Firstly there was a surprise, at the the end the disapointment. Game looks like a DLC for BF3, at first look almost nothing has changed. Multiplayer is great but after a few hours a little bit more stereotypical than BF3. For me BF3 was better, it was something new in a serie with a beautiful visual and free gameplay, this seems like a poor cousin of BF3 and I don't now exactly why, maybeFirstly there was a surprise, at the the end the disapointment. Game looks like a DLC for BF3, at first look almost nothing has changed. Multiplayer is great but after a few hours a little bit more stereotypical than BF3. For me BF3 was better, it was something new in a serie with a beautiful visual and free gameplay, this seems like a poor cousin of BF3 and I don't now exactly why, maybe the game just needed more time to be more different and not only a same as the previous game. In fact I am more into singleplayer than MP, so i was looking forward to play these, because SP in BF3 was quite good in my opinion, but this time it was only MEH ... if you want a good modern combat FPS with tanks, aircrafts and things like this keep playing BF3.

    + Visual
    + solid gameplay
    + Huge arsenal
    +/- MP is really good, but BF3 is better
    - dissapointment in SP and a few decisions at the end of the game can not improve it
    - nothing has really changed
    - no inovations
    - total stupid AI in SP (for me the most retarded AI after Homefront)

    P.S. Don't buy it if you only want to play SP, better buy ArmA 3, Modern Warfare remastered if you want modern combat FPS.    … Expand
  74. ElCucuy
    Apr 1, 2019
    5
    Network game is not interested. I appreciate the single. Nothing stands out middle peasant. 5 out of 10
  75. NotBanMePLZ
    Jan 27, 2019
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Про онлайн ничего сказать не могу, т.к. пират. А вот сюжетка офигенная, офигенно короткая.. Да она о**енная, но слишком короткая, НУ СЛИИИШКОМ, я понимаю что основа игры это онлайн, но как же обидно что такая замечательная сюжетка так быстро кончается. Персонажи харизматичные, но в конце я плакал не из-за печальной концовки, А ИЗ-ЗА ТОГО ЧТО ИГРА ТАК БЫСТРО КОНЧИЛАСЬ, не ну Ханну (В моем случае) конечно жалко, но то что игра закончилась это еще грустнее... 22.11.2018… Expand
  76. itsbandit
    Mar 7, 2019
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. As of today, in 2019, with still a few thousand active players and after DICE LA (Danger Close) seemingly saved this game from the downfall that Sweden put it In, I'm very happy to announce that even to this day, the game is content rich and very fun to play, extremely balanced and nothing feels to awful on the multiplayer end, however, the single player is an insult to Kjell (Dice employee who passed. was ex military, the BF4 campaign had a song made for him). The story campaign wise makes little to no sense, has easy terminology such as "sailor, or "marine" mixed up on characters that are not those things, clearly has no clue how US Military works at all, cutscenes that are broken, sequences that fail to trigger and cause massive anger as these bugs are game breaking like when trying to kill the Helo in the first mission, many times it wont die, how BF3 story is more polished than this is beyond me, the campaign, though its acting was amazing, just felt lazy, example, when you leave china and are on the pontoon and irish is yelling for people to follow him, he tends to yell toward the front of the boat, implying people are there too, yet if you look, there's no ships or people there, like what the **** are you yelling at? it just feels out of place. The war they are in makes no sense, also how Chinese managed to take out a whole US fleet and none of these ships seemingly had any of there tech working or had any sort of comms because apparently EMP knocks out everything for 50km out to sea causing a fleet of 20 ships to go down to one, because it makes sense that top of the line military hardware including AA cant shoot down **** helo's or apparently nobody mans their stations... Even worse is the ending, DICE clearly has no clue how C4 works, also WHY THE HELL DID SOMEONE HAVE TO DIE WHEN THEY LEFT A RHIB BOAT RIGHT NEXT TO THEM WHERE THE C4 CHARGE WAS SUPPOSED TO SIT, LIKE DID DICE FORGET HOW THE "MARINES" ENDED UP GRAPPLED TO A BRIDGE??? NOBODY HAD TO DIE, ALSO C4 WOULD NOT KILL YOU IF YOU JUST ****ING SWAM LOW, ALSO SINCE WHEN DID C4 JUST BLOW UP DESTROYERS?? Like jesus they put zero effort into this story at all. Its absolutely repulsive, which makes you wonder, they spent so much money on the story yet its this awful, I mean **** they had RYAN REYNOLDS AS YOUR CHARACTER ON THE BOX, USED HIM AS THE CHARACTER MODEL FOR RECKER, HAD ALL THESE HOLLYWOOD NAMES, YET THE STORY WAS THAT BAD. KJELL WOULD BE INSUTLED, HE WAS IN THE MILITARY, YOU TURN SACRAFICE INTO A JOKE.… Expand
  77. 4ya5h1
    Aug 13, 2023
    6
    havent play multiplayer so cant speak about it, but i finished campain and it just ok. nothing special. gameplay and graphics is good, i like physics in this game, but plot is really bad, its unrealistic
  78. Cz3rw0ny
    Feb 9, 2021
    7
    A game that had a weak start, was a bit more laggy and slow than 3rd BF, but was one of the longest supported games in the franchise.
  79. zNeverSleeping
    Jun 23, 2019
    7
    - Graficos: 8
    - Jogabilidade: 8
    - Historia: 8
    - Direção: 4
    - Trilha Sonora: 7
    - Densempenho (RTX 2060 + Ryzen 1600): 7
  80. matdimond
    Aug 9, 2019
    7
    ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
  81. Angrytiger
    Feb 17, 2021
    6
    Graphics = 3 of 3
    Story = 2 of 3
    Gameplay = 2 of 3
    Music and Sound = 1 of 3
    Wow factor = 2 of 3
    Total = 10 of 15 or 6 of 10
  82. Bloodnes
    Jan 17, 2021
    6
    от 3 части не далеко ушла, игра посредственная как по мне, сюжет просто мертвый, графика приятная и на этом плюсы закончились. Про баги промолчу. 6/10
  83. hileger
    Oct 19, 2022
    7
    ПИФфафилд 4 тоже самое дерьмо только с графоном Середняк ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
  84. ErayTellezi
    Nov 17, 2020
    7
    Güzel çalışan, tank bölümüyle beni sinir eden oyun. Sonra gelecek 1'in haberciymiş resmen.
  85. bar0yka
    Jan 30, 2023
    7
    3 ten sonra ea çok daha kalit4esiz birşey yapmış hikaye sürükleyicilik mekanikler falan heyecanlandırmadı hişç
  86. matee75
    Sep 2, 2022
    7
    5 hour long campaign, filled with bugs, even after nearly a decade. The hitbox was also faulty.
  87. Ali129
    Jun 4, 2021
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Battlefield 4 benim için büyük bir hayal kırıklığı oldu. Oyunun tek oyunculu modu hatalarla dolu ve oldukça sıkıcı. Oyunun hikayesinden biraz bahsedeyim. Oyunda Recker isimli bir ABD'li donanma askerini kontrol ediyoruz. Oyun Recker ve ekibinin bulunduğu arabanın sular altında kalması ve ekip komutanı Dunn'ın Recker'a aracın camına sıkıp kendisi ile ekibin üyelerini kurtarması için emir vermesi ile başlar. Her ne kadar Recker bunu yapmak istemese ve yanındaki arkadaşı "Irish" de ona bunu yapmamasını söylese de Recker cama sıkar ve oyun bu anın 13 dakika gerisine döner. Bu 13 dakikada ekibin uzun çatışmalar sonrasında araba ile kaçarken düşman helikopterinin ateş açması sonucu aracın kontrolden çıktığını ve denize düştüğünü görürüz. Ardından ekip bir VIP'yi almak için Çin'e gizli operasyon için gönderilir. Çin'de Amiral Chang isimli asker yönetime el koymuştur ve halk isyan etmektedir. Tombstone ekibinin de almak için Çin'e gittiği VIP, Çin'in muhtemel lideri Jin Jié'dir. VIP'yi teslim aldıktan sonra geri dönüş yolunda Çin askerleri ile çatışan ekip, Irish'in isteği üzerine Çin'den kaçmak isteyen Çinlileri de alıp gemileri USS Valkyrie'ye dönmeye çalışır ve sonunda gemiye ulaşırlar. Ekip gemiye ulaştıktan sonra Yüzbaşı Garrison, USS Titan'ın saldırı altında olduğunu ve batmadan önce geminin içinde bulunan "DCC" isimli cihazı alıp getirmelerini söyler. Ekip Ajan Kovic komutasında batmakta olan USS Titan'a gider ve cihazı aldıktan sonra USS Valkyrie'ye geri dönerler. Fakat USS Valkyrie de Çin askerleri tarafından saldırıya uğrar ve saldırı püskürtülse de Kovic ölür. Kovic'in ölümünden sonra ekibin yeni komutanı Recker olur. Ekip Çin istihbaratı ve CIA için çalışan Hannah ile birlikte operasyonlar düzenler. Bir operasyonda ekip yakalanır ve Hannah Çinli oluşunu kullanarak Çin askerlerini ekibi kendisinin yakaladığına inandırır. Biraz işkence gördükten sonra Recker, içerisinde Battlefield 3'ten tanıdığımız Dima'nın da bulunduğu bir koğuşa yerleştirilir. Burada Dima ile birlikte hapisten kaçar ve Irish'i de hapisten kurtarırlar. Tam tekrar yakalanacakları sırada Hannah gelir ve onları kurtarır, böylece Recker ve Irish bunların bir plan olduğunun ve Hannah'nın onlara ihanet etmediğinin farkına varır. Uzun çatışmalardan sonra Dima öldürülür fakat ekip kurtulmayı başarır. Başka operasyonlar da yapan ekip, USS Valkyrie'nin saldırı altında olduğunu öğrenir ve hemen gemiye dönerler. Çinli askerler, Jin Jié'yi Amerikalıların öldürdüğünü düşündükleri için gemiyi basarlar fakat hayatta ve yaralı olan Jin Jié Çinli askerler ile konuşup silah bırakmalarını sağlar. Ekip Yüzbaşı Garrison'ın emri ile bol miktarda patlayıcı alıp Chang'in gemisini havaya uçurmaya gider, ancak uzaktan kumanda tutukluk yapar ve bombalar patlamaz. Ekipten biri bombaların patlaması için kendini feda etmelidir. Burada oyuncuya 2 seçenek verilir, Recker ya Hannah, ya da Irish'i seçmelidir. Oyuncunun seçiminden sonra seçilen kişi gider ve bombalar patlar, hikaye bu şekilde biter. Önceki oyunda güçlü bulduğum hikaye ve hikaye sunumu bu oyunda çok kötü. Hikaye ve karakterler ilgi çekici ve akılda kalıcı değil, sunum olarak da oyun oldukça başarısız. Ana karakter hiç konuşmadığı, bir kişiliğe sahip olmadığı için ve diğer karakterler de çok sıradan olduğu için oyun karakterler bakımından da zayıf. Örnek vermek gerekirse bir yerden sonra Recker ekip komutanı oluyor fakat hiçbir şey söylemediği için bunu hiç hissedemiyoruz. Karakterler Recker ile konuşurken Recker'dan hiç ses çıkmadığı için sanki kendi kendilerine konuşuyormuş gibi oluyorlar. Oynanış olarak oyun fena sayılmaz, kullanılan iyi oyun motorundan dolayı vuruş hissi ve fizikler iyi. Silah çeşitliliği konusunda da oyun başarılı ve silah kullanımları da keyifli. Seçtiğimiz silahı ister tekli ister otomatik modda kullanabiliyoruz. Yapay zeka olarak oyun çok kötü durumda, yanımızdaki karakterler ve düşmanlar çok saçma hareket ediyorlar ve bu oyuncuyu atmosferden koparıyor. Oyunu başarısız bulduğum bir diğer konu görev dizaynı, özellikle gemi ve havaalanına ulaşma görevlerinde oldukça sıkıldım, görev dizaynı çeşitli değil ve sıkıcı. Grafiksel olarak oyun gayet güzel görünüyor, kaplamalar, gölgeler ve ışıklandırma gayet başarılı, performans konusunda da genel olarak bir sorun yaşamadım. Ancak oyunun hatalar ile dolu olduğunu söyleyebilirim, duvarın içine giren düşmanlar ile pek çok defa karşılaştım. Ayrıca 2 defa görevi baştan başlatmadığım sürece devam etmemi engelleyen hatalar da meydana geldi. Battlefield 4, bir önceki oyunu oynadıktan sonra büyük umutlar beslediğim ama beni hayal kırıklığına uğratan bir oyun oldu.… Expand
  88. vova22379
    Dec 18, 2021
    6
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
  89. JoelArpal
    Dec 28, 2020
    6
    I can't stand the servers. That's it. I hate the servers and i hate how the origin platform works. I'm sad because it's a good game, but i just can't stand the platform where it works.
  90. maxpain9999
    Sep 9, 2023
    6
    Complete waste of time
    this game is full of bugs
    not only the worst war game I've ever played but the worst game I've ever played
    some missions are just impossible to complete because of the bugs in this game
    and they still haven't fixed them after all this time
  91. KevLooney
    May 12, 2021
    6
    Snipers, vehicles, shotguns, and explosives are a significant problem. Vehicles are a massive issue. One feels like you cannot play the game without dealing with vehicles which are unbalanced against infantry. It feels like it wants to be an infantry and a vehicle game at the same time. Yet cross domain combat is insidious at almost all times.
  92. mesutaltin
    Mar 13, 2021
    7
    Güzel oyun. Tavsiye ederim. Oynanması gereken bir oyun. Bu tarzdan hoşlananlar sevecektir.
  93. ChampionofDeaTH
    Oct 25, 2021
    6
    обычный шутан с техникой , мы с кериком отрубились но не так много потому что игра в целом на пару часов
  94. petrkozak13
    Dec 15, 2022
    7
    After Battlefield 3, this game feels more like a DLC than a new entry. Not a bad game, but the bugs and dumb AI in sinle-player make it a painful experience.
  95. Dan9el99
    Dec 27, 2021
    7
    Solider Shooter mit einem Online Modus, der wirklich Spaß macht und technisch nach Startschwierigkeiten inzwischen gut funktioniert. Die Story ist jedoch sehr flach und bedient weitestgehend Stereotype, die auf Dauer langweilig werden. Das wuchtige Sounddesign und der schöne Soundtrack sind weitere Highlights (7/10).
  96. arllda
    Feb 4, 2023
    5
    there are definitely shortcomings, not very good, not very bad, but one or six can be considered bad
  97. Suprizer
    Apr 22, 2023
    5
    I am one of those who like 4 more than 3 and i mean it in every way story and gameplay this one just feels more idk how to put i but easier to enjoy... maybe idk i feel like veterans of 3 are just unforgiving and on 4 you can enjoy more things.
  98. Dartza
    Aug 1, 2023
    5
    Decent but forgettable. Battlefield 4 felt like it hung right between the hayday of Call of Duty and the downward spiral of live service games that followed.
next
Page:

Awards & Rankings

44
#44 Best PC Game of 2013
7
#7 Most Discussed PC Game of 2013
27
#27 Most Shared PC Game of 2013

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
81

Generally favorable reviews - based on 52 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 42 out of 52
  2. Mixed: 10 out of 52
  3. Negative: 0 out of 52
  1. Pelit (Finland)
    Mar 11, 2014
    91
    Battlefield 4 could just as well be called Battlefield 3.5. The new Battlefield features are only marginal improvements over Battlefield 3, but even as such it leaves the competitors way behind. Hopefully the bugs will be squashed soon. [Nov 2013]
  2. GameCritics
    Jan 13, 2014
    60
    Even if multiplayer wasn't buggy, Battlefield 4 would still only be a barely passable installment in all respects besides the snazzy graphics. EA and DICE played it safe by providing the same thing they did the last time around, with another phoned-in campaign and only minor alterations to the online.
    Read full review
  3. Level7.nu
    Jan 3, 2014
    60
    Battlefield 4 keeps soldiering on in the same footsteps as previous games in the series. The lack of worthwhile news makes you wish for more. Dice stays in its comfort zone calls for explosions and not much more. The series needs to evolve or fade out.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »