Battlefield 4

 PC
User Score
6.3

Mixed or average reviews- based on 4118 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2,054 out of 4118
  2. Mixed: 847 out of 4118
  3. Negative: 1,217 out of 4118
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. maxpain9999
    Sep 9, 2023
    6
    Complete waste of time
    this game is full of bugs
    not only the worst war game I've ever played but the worst game I've ever played
    some missions are just impossible to complete because of the bugs in this game
    and they still haven't fixed them after all this time
  2. 4ya5h1
    Aug 13, 2023
    6
    havent play multiplayer so cant speak about it, but i finished campain and it just ok. nothing special. gameplay and graphics is good, i like physics in this game, but plot is really bad, its unrealistic
  3. Dartza
    Aug 1, 2023
    5
    Decent but forgettable. Battlefield 4 felt like it hung right between the hayday of Call of Duty and the downward spiral of live service games that followed.
  4. Suprizer
    Apr 22, 2023
    5
    I am one of those who like 4 more than 3 and i mean it in every way story and gameplay this one just feels more idk how to put i but easier to enjoy... maybe idk i feel like veterans of 3 are just unforgiving and on 4 you can enjoy more things.
  5. arllda
    Feb 4, 2023
    5
    there are definitely shortcomings, not very good, not very bad, but one or six can be considered bad
  6. bar0yka
    Jan 30, 2023
    7
    3 ten sonra ea çok daha kalit4esiz birşey yapmış hikaye sürükleyicilik mekanikler falan heyecanlandırmadı hişç
  7. petrkozak13
    Dec 15, 2022
    7
    After Battlefield 3, this game feels more like a DLC than a new entry. Not a bad game, but the bugs and dumb AI in sinle-player make it a painful experience.
  8. Soullex
    Nov 30, 2022
    5
    3'ün aynısı ama çoğu COD oyunundan çok daha iyi............................
  9. yunusemre23023
    Oct 25, 2022
    5
    this game is very bad. It's swim mechanics worried. I don't like this. I think battlefield's other games more than this game.
  10. Aspromixy
    Oct 22, 2022
    7
    sometimes I play multiplayer, I can play for a couple of hours, the servers are still open, the company is also quite interesting, I don't seem to see cheaters, people play in the evening, the servers are full, the sounds of firing weapons are chic, actually better than some modern shooters, the graphics too very pleasant, the game is like fine wine, it better with age
  11. hileger
    Oct 19, 2022
    7
    ПИФфафилд 4 тоже самое дерьмо только с графоном Середняк ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
  12. Nihron
    Sep 24, 2022
    7
    +1 балл за фразу "давайте, вы будете выполнять свою работу, а я, блядь, буду командовать"
  13. matee75
    Sep 2, 2022
    7
    5 hour long campaign, filled with bugs, even after nearly a decade. The hitbox was also faulty.
  14. Izoeros
    Apr 26, 2022
    7
    qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq
  15. Dan9el99
    Dec 27, 2021
    7
    Solider Shooter mit einem Online Modus, der wirklich Spaß macht und technisch nach Startschwierigkeiten inzwischen gut funktioniert. Die Story ist jedoch sehr flach und bedient weitestgehend Stereotype, die auf Dauer langweilig werden. Das wuchtige Sounddesign und der schöne Soundtrack sind weitere Highlights (7/10).
  16. vova22379
    Dec 18, 2021
    6
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
  17. ChampionofDeaTH
    Oct 25, 2021
    6
    обычный шутан с техникой , мы с кериком отрубились но не так много потому что игра в целом на пару часов
  18. Ali129
    Jun 4, 2021
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Battlefield 4 benim için büyük bir hayal kırıklığı oldu. Oyunun tek oyunculu modu hatalarla dolu ve oldukça sıkıcı. Oyunun hikayesinden biraz bahsedeyim. Oyunda Recker isimli bir ABD'li donanma askerini kontrol ediyoruz. Oyun Recker ve ekibinin bulunduğu arabanın sular altında kalması ve ekip komutanı Dunn'ın Recker'a aracın camına sıkıp kendisi ile ekibin üyelerini kurtarması için emir vermesi ile başlar. Her ne kadar Recker bunu yapmak istemese ve yanındaki arkadaşı "Irish" de ona bunu yapmamasını söylese de Recker cama sıkar ve oyun bu anın 13 dakika gerisine döner. Bu 13 dakikada ekibin uzun çatışmalar sonrasında araba ile kaçarken düşman helikopterinin ateş açması sonucu aracın kontrolden çıktığını ve denize düştüğünü görürüz. Ardından ekip bir VIP'yi almak için Çin'e gizli operasyon için gönderilir. Çin'de Amiral Chang isimli asker yönetime el koymuştur ve halk isyan etmektedir. Tombstone ekibinin de almak için Çin'e gittiği VIP, Çin'in muhtemel lideri Jin Jié'dir. VIP'yi teslim aldıktan sonra geri dönüş yolunda Çin askerleri ile çatışan ekip, Irish'in isteği üzerine Çin'den kaçmak isteyen Çinlileri de alıp gemileri USS Valkyrie'ye dönmeye çalışır ve sonunda gemiye ulaşırlar. Ekip gemiye ulaştıktan sonra Yüzbaşı Garrison, USS Titan'ın saldırı altında olduğunu ve batmadan önce geminin içinde bulunan "DCC" isimli cihazı alıp getirmelerini söyler. Ekip Ajan Kovic komutasında batmakta olan USS Titan'a gider ve cihazı aldıktan sonra USS Valkyrie'ye geri dönerler. Fakat USS Valkyrie de Çin askerleri tarafından saldırıya uğrar ve saldırı püskürtülse de Kovic ölür. Kovic'in ölümünden sonra ekibin yeni komutanı Recker olur. Ekip Çin istihbaratı ve CIA için çalışan Hannah ile birlikte operasyonlar düzenler. Bir operasyonda ekip yakalanır ve Hannah Çinli oluşunu kullanarak Çin askerlerini ekibi kendisinin yakaladığına inandırır. Biraz işkence gördükten sonra Recker, içerisinde Battlefield 3'ten tanıdığımız Dima'nın da bulunduğu bir koğuşa yerleştirilir. Burada Dima ile birlikte hapisten kaçar ve Irish'i de hapisten kurtarırlar. Tam tekrar yakalanacakları sırada Hannah gelir ve onları kurtarır, böylece Recker ve Irish bunların bir plan olduğunun ve Hannah'nın onlara ihanet etmediğinin farkına varır. Uzun çatışmalardan sonra Dima öldürülür fakat ekip kurtulmayı başarır. Başka operasyonlar da yapan ekip, USS Valkyrie'nin saldırı altında olduğunu öğrenir ve hemen gemiye dönerler. Çinli askerler, Jin Jié'yi Amerikalıların öldürdüğünü düşündükleri için gemiyi basarlar fakat hayatta ve yaralı olan Jin Jié Çinli askerler ile konuşup silah bırakmalarını sağlar. Ekip Yüzbaşı Garrison'ın emri ile bol miktarda patlayıcı alıp Chang'in gemisini havaya uçurmaya gider, ancak uzaktan kumanda tutukluk yapar ve bombalar patlamaz. Ekipten biri bombaların patlaması için kendini feda etmelidir. Burada oyuncuya 2 seçenek verilir, Recker ya Hannah, ya da Irish'i seçmelidir. Oyuncunun seçiminden sonra seçilen kişi gider ve bombalar patlar, hikaye bu şekilde biter. Önceki oyunda güçlü bulduğum hikaye ve hikaye sunumu bu oyunda çok kötü. Hikaye ve karakterler ilgi çekici ve akılda kalıcı değil, sunum olarak da oyun oldukça başarısız. Ana karakter hiç konuşmadığı, bir kişiliğe sahip olmadığı için ve diğer karakterler de çok sıradan olduğu için oyun karakterler bakımından da zayıf. Örnek vermek gerekirse bir yerden sonra Recker ekip komutanı oluyor fakat hiçbir şey söylemediği için bunu hiç hissedemiyoruz. Karakterler Recker ile konuşurken Recker'dan hiç ses çıkmadığı için sanki kendi kendilerine konuşuyormuş gibi oluyorlar. Oynanış olarak oyun fena sayılmaz, kullanılan iyi oyun motorundan dolayı vuruş hissi ve fizikler iyi. Silah çeşitliliği konusunda da oyun başarılı ve silah kullanımları da keyifli. Seçtiğimiz silahı ister tekli ister otomatik modda kullanabiliyoruz. Yapay zeka olarak oyun çok kötü durumda, yanımızdaki karakterler ve düşmanlar çok saçma hareket ediyorlar ve bu oyuncuyu atmosferden koparıyor. Oyunu başarısız bulduğum bir diğer konu görev dizaynı, özellikle gemi ve havaalanına ulaşma görevlerinde oldukça sıkıldım, görev dizaynı çeşitli değil ve sıkıcı. Grafiksel olarak oyun gayet güzel görünüyor, kaplamalar, gölgeler ve ışıklandırma gayet başarılı, performans konusunda da genel olarak bir sorun yaşamadım. Ancak oyunun hatalar ile dolu olduğunu söyleyebilirim, duvarın içine giren düşmanlar ile pek çok defa karşılaştım. Ayrıca 2 defa görevi baştan başlatmadığım sürece devam etmemi engelleyen hatalar da meydana geldi. Battlefield 4, bir önceki oyunu oynadıktan sonra büyük umutlar beslediğim ama beni hayal kırıklığına uğratan bir oyun oldu.… Expand
  19. KevLooney
    May 12, 2021
    6
    Snipers, vehicles, shotguns, and explosives are a significant problem. Vehicles are a massive issue. One feels like you cannot play the game without dealing with vehicles which are unbalanced against infantry. It feels like it wants to be an infantry and a vehicle game at the same time. Yet cross domain combat is insidious at almost all times.
  20. mesutaltin
    Mar 13, 2021
    7
    Güzel oyun. Tavsiye ederim. Oynanması gereken bir oyun. Bu tarzdan hoşlananlar sevecektir.
  21. Angrytiger
    Feb 17, 2021
    6
    Graphics = 3 of 3
    Story = 2 of 3
    Gameplay = 2 of 3
    Music and Sound = 1 of 3
    Wow factor = 2 of 3
    Total = 10 of 15 or 6 of 10
  22. Cz3rw0ny
    Feb 9, 2021
    7
    A game that had a weak start, was a bit more laggy and slow than 3rd BF, but was one of the longest supported games in the franchise.
  23. Bloodnes
    Jan 17, 2021
    6
    от 3 части не далеко ушла, игра посредственная как по мне, сюжет просто мертвый, графика приятная и на этом плюсы закончились. Про баги промолчу. 6/10
  24. JoelArpal
    Dec 28, 2020
    6
    I can't stand the servers. That's it. I hate the servers and i hate how the origin platform works. I'm sad because it's a good game, but i just can't stand the platform where it works.
  25. ErayTellezi
    Nov 17, 2020
    7
    Güzel çalışan, tank bölümüyle beni sinir eden oyun. Sonra gelecek 1'in haberciymiş resmen.
  26. Khazar2
    Apr 15, 2020
    7
    TL;DR: Objectively not a top 5 Battlefield game, but still very good considering it's a copy of the best Battlefield.

    I was very conflicted on whether to give the game a 5 or a 7 due my bias in favor of the game. Yes it's a carbon copy of BF3, yes it added more issues than solved them. and yes it was a disappointment until DICE LA saved it. But at the end of the day, it's the closest    TL;DR: Objectively not a top 5 Battlefield game, but still very good considering it's a copy of the best Battlefield.

    I was very conflicted on whether to give the game a 5 or a 7 due my bias in favor of the game. Yes it's a carbon copy of BF3, yes it added more issues than solved them. and yes it was a disappointment until DICE LA saved it. But at the end of the day, it's the closest current gen game to Battlefield 3 and introduced 64 player matches to consoles. That alone should give it 7/10. You can make a good argument for giving it a 5/10 (but not lower than that) when considering that this game can be summarized as an inferior version of BF3, but this argument becomes less and less relevant as the online BF3 servers become more and more sporadic. The dedicated fanbase to BF4 even two games later is a testament to its greatness.    … Expand
  27. Tabbris
    Dec 16, 2019
    6
    Well this is like bf3 but shorter. Story is liniear and nice, sountrack is good
  28. matdimond
    Aug 9, 2019
    7
    ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
  29. zNeverSleeping
    Jun 23, 2019
    7
    - Graficos: 8
    - Jogabilidade: 8
    - Historia: 8
    - Direção: 4
    - Trilha Sonora: 7
    - Densempenho (RTX 2060 + Ryzen 1600): 7
  30. ElCucuy
    Apr 1, 2019
    5
    Network game is not interested. I appreciate the single. Nothing stands out middle peasant. 5 out of 10
  31. itsbandit
    Mar 7, 2019
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. As of today, in 2019, with still a few thousand active players and after DICE LA (Danger Close) seemingly saved this game from the downfall that Sweden put it In, I'm very happy to announce that even to this day, the game is content rich and very fun to play, extremely balanced and nothing feels to awful on the multiplayer end, however, the single player is an insult to Kjell (Dice employee who passed. was ex military, the BF4 campaign had a song made for him). The story campaign wise makes little to no sense, has easy terminology such as "sailor, or "marine" mixed up on characters that are not those things, clearly has no clue how US Military works at all, cutscenes that are broken, sequences that fail to trigger and cause massive anger as these bugs are game breaking like when trying to kill the Helo in the first mission, many times it wont die, how BF3 story is more polished than this is beyond me, the campaign, though its acting was amazing, just felt lazy, example, when you leave china and are on the pontoon and irish is yelling for people to follow him, he tends to yell toward the front of the boat, implying people are there too, yet if you look, there's no ships or people there, like what the **** are you yelling at? it just feels out of place. The war they are in makes no sense, also how Chinese managed to take out a whole US fleet and none of these ships seemingly had any of there tech working or had any sort of comms because apparently EMP knocks out everything for 50km out to sea causing a fleet of 20 ships to go down to one, because it makes sense that top of the line military hardware including AA cant shoot down **** helo's or apparently nobody mans their stations... Even worse is the ending, DICE clearly has no clue how C4 works, also WHY THE HELL DID SOMEONE HAVE TO DIE WHEN THEY LEFT A RHIB BOAT RIGHT NEXT TO THEM WHERE THE C4 CHARGE WAS SUPPOSED TO SIT, LIKE DID DICE FORGET HOW THE "MARINES" ENDED UP GRAPPLED TO A BRIDGE??? NOBODY HAD TO DIE, ALSO C4 WOULD NOT KILL YOU IF YOU JUST ****ING SWAM LOW, ALSO SINCE WHEN DID C4 JUST BLOW UP DESTROYERS?? Like jesus they put zero effort into this story at all. Its absolutely repulsive, which makes you wonder, they spent so much money on the story yet its this awful, I mean **** they had RYAN REYNOLDS AS YOUR CHARACTER ON THE BOX, USED HIM AS THE CHARACTER MODEL FOR RECKER, HAD ALL THESE HOLLYWOOD NAMES, YET THE STORY WAS THAT BAD. KJELL WOULD BE INSUTLED, HE WAS IN THE MILITARY, YOU TURN SACRAFICE INTO A JOKE.… Expand
  32. NotBanMePLZ
    Jan 27, 2019
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Про онлайн ничего сказать не могу, т.к. пират. А вот сюжетка офигенная, офигенно короткая.. Да она о**енная, но слишком короткая, НУ СЛИИИШКОМ, я понимаю что основа игры это онлайн, но как же обидно что такая замечательная сюжетка так быстро кончается. Персонажи харизматичные, но в конце я плакал не из-за печальной концовки, А ИЗ-ЗА ТОГО ЧТО ИГРА ТАК БЫСТРО КОНЧИЛАСЬ, не ну Ханну (В моем случае) конечно жалко, но то что игра закончилась это еще грустнее... 22.11.2018… Expand
  33. Fany000
    Nov 10, 2018
    6
    Firstly there was a surprise, at the the end the disapointment. Game looks like a DLC for BF3, at first look almost nothing has changed. Multiplayer is great but after a few hours a little bit more stereotypical than BF3. For me BF3 was better, it was something new in a serie with a beautiful visual and free gameplay, this seems like a poor cousin of BF3 and I don't now exactly why, maybeFirstly there was a surprise, at the the end the disapointment. Game looks like a DLC for BF3, at first look almost nothing has changed. Multiplayer is great but after a few hours a little bit more stereotypical than BF3. For me BF3 was better, it was something new in a serie with a beautiful visual and free gameplay, this seems like a poor cousin of BF3 and I don't now exactly why, maybe the game just needed more time to be more different and not only a same as the previous game. In fact I am more into singleplayer than MP, so i was looking forward to play these, because SP in BF3 was quite good in my opinion, but this time it was only MEH ... if you want a good modern combat FPS with tanks, aircrafts and things like this keep playing BF3.

    + Visual
    + solid gameplay
    + Huge arsenal
    +/- MP is really good, but BF3 is better
    - dissapointment in SP and a few decisions at the end of the game can not improve it
    - nothing has really changed
    - no inovations
    - total stupid AI in SP (for me the most retarded AI after Homefront)

    P.S. Don't buy it if you only want to play SP, better buy ArmA 3, Modern Warfare remastered if you want modern combat FPS.    … Expand
  34. Caerleon
    Sep 11, 2018
    7
    After several years, I changed my mind. At the moment, Battle is the best part of the franchise. See for yourself. You can be a commander and help your brothers in arms. HUGE selection of weapons and customization.
  35. Mobile
    Jun 20, 2018
    7
    ENG - RU
    In this review I will compare only the 3 and 4, the rest I do not know, and much sense to compare no, so it was better, and 4 of Raskin three-pointers.
    First of the story of the company: the worst "partners" in the history of shooters, such nonsense I have not seen anywhere else, if not marked enemies and thus did not give the order (press the Q button throughout the game),    ENG - RU
    In this review I will compare only the 3 and 4, the rest I do not know, and much sense to compare no, so it was better, and 4 of Raskin three-pointers.
    First of the story of the company: the worst "partners" in the history of shooters, such nonsense I have not seen anywhere else, if not marked enemies and thus did not give the order (press the Q button throughout the game), these idiots will just sit and watch, even if the enemy is right in front of them, the system will ignore them, as if they do not exist, that's the case. Pleased with the freedom, more cinematic, at least some companions (more or less with the character), the mission on the tank, shooting, pumping, collecting tokens. Overall nicer and more fun than a three-pointer.
    At the expense of multiplayer, in short: a lot of excess, almost everywhere, a lot of body kits that are duplicated or half is not used, but it's nice to open them, to get experience for them, to open the next case, to include the increase of experience, which just endlessly fall, although up to 100 rank, you can pump very quickly, do not compare Can't tell you where the best shooting, but a 4 if you compare the trunks of the 3, it seems that as it is easier without recoil, and generally if everything is too simplified, even with the machine gun, you don't need to broadcast the arm which significantly helped in 3, here is something else all.
    В данном отзыве буду сравнивать лишь 3 и 4 часть, остальные мне не знакомы, да и смысла особо сравнивать нет, так - как раньше было лучше, и 4 часть рескрин трешки.
    Сначала о сюжетной компании: самые худшие "напарники" за всю историю шутеров, такого бреда я еще не видел нигде, если бы не пометил врагов и тем самым не отдал приказ (прожимать кнопку Q на протяжении всей игры), то эти идиоты будут просто сидеть и смотреть, даже если враг прямо перед ними, система будет игнорировать их, будто их и не существует, вот такие дела. Порадовала свобода, больше киношности, хоть какие нибудь напарники (более менее с характером), миссия на танке, стрельба, прокачка, сбор жетонов. В целом приятней и веселей чем трешка.
    На счет мультиплеера, если коротко: то много лишнего, практически во всем, много обвесов, которые дублируются или половина вообще не используется, да их приятно открывать, получать за них опыт, открывать очередной кейс, включать повышения опыта, которые просто без конца валятся, хотя до 100 ранга, можно прокачаться очень быстро, не сравнить с 3 частью. Не могу сказать где лучше стрельба, но вот в 4 если сравнивать стволы из 3, то кажется что как то легче, без отдачи, и вообще будто все слишком упростили, даже с пулемета, не нужно вещать рукоятку которая, ощутимо помогала в 3, здесь как то иначе все.    … Expand
  36. eva3si0n
    Jul 2, 2017
    5
    Game came out in so crude state that the first half of year it was global beta dough rather. In a game no, there is nothing new, it is just slightly improved BF3, under improved I mean only graphics, a sound and Levolution. For the rest only regress. The equipment is simplified to simplicity. Cards on start in general were awful. The ballistics became worse, closer to COD. Singleplayer inGame came out in so crude state that the first half of year it was global beta dough rather. In a game no, there is nothing new, it is just slightly improved BF3, under improved I mean only graphics, a sound and Levolution. For the rest only regress. The equipment is simplified to simplicity. Cards on start in general were awful. The ballistics became worse, closer to COD. Singleplayer in general a failure, so boring and uninteresting Singleplayer wasn't in a series. And yes the most important probema is an optimization, she still wishes to be the best, Netcode still didn't repair. A game was saved by children from DICE LA who somehow repaired this braking piece of **** from EA.… Expand
  37. Ripplecry
    Dec 3, 2016
    6
    Genelde bu tür oyunların hayatta kalma ve hikaye kısımlarını seven, 3-4 kişilik seçkin bir tim ile kahramanca çarpışmayı keyifle icra eden biriyim. bu yüzdendir ki cod mw 1-2-3'te nice çılgın atmalar yaşadık john başgan, nikolai ve maktıraviş ile.

    Bu oyunun bütçesi nedir, kimler yönetmiştir, kaç mühendis çalışmıştır bilmiyorum; olmamış da demek istemiyorum böyle güzel bir emeğe, lakin    Genelde bu tür oyunların hayatta kalma ve hikaye kısımlarını seven, 3-4 kişilik seçkin bir tim ile kahramanca çarpışmayı keyifle icra eden biriyim. bu yüzdendir ki cod mw 1-2-3'te nice çılgın atmalar yaşadık john başgan, nikolai ve maktıraviş ile.

    Bu oyunun bütçesi nedir, kimler yönetmiştir, kaç mühendis çalışmıştır bilmiyorum; olmamış da demek istemiyorum böyle güzel bir emeğe, lakin sıkıcı olmuş. ara sahnelerde öldüm sıkıntıdan. Hikaye kopuk, ne için ve niye savaştığımızı bile pek bilmiyoruz. sadece tipik amerikan tarzı dünya görüşüyle, kime neden saldırdığımızı bilmeden bize karşı olan herkesi öldürüp üslerini ele geçirmek için yetiştirilmiş binlerce askerden birkaçıyız bu oyunda.Cod'da öyle değil ama, her şeyin bir nedeni ve operasyonların bir karizması, ağırlığı var. operasyonların sonunda elde ettiğimiz şeyler verdiğimiz kayıplara değiyor. Lakin üzülerek söylüyorum ki bu oyunda böyle bir şey yok.

    Takdir etmek gerekir ki, bireysel çatışmalardaki silah sesleri ile aksamları ve öldürme hadisesi çok gerçekçi olmuş. Hele kaliteli bir kulakiçi kulaklığınız varsa oradaymışçasına oyunun atmosferine kapılıveriyorsunuz. Sıktığınız asker önce dengesini kaybediyor, silahınızın gücüne ve nişan kabiliyetinize göre de bir veya iki kurşun sonra düşman ölüyor. Bunu resmen alkışladım pc başında, çok başarılı.
    Ama söylemeden geçilmemesi gerekiyor ki, ekibiniz hiçbir işe yaramıyor çatışmada. Kaldı ki tüm düşman askerleri sadece size sıkıyor, kafanızı dahi kaldırmak güçleşiyor. Ekip arkadaşlarınız bir halta yaramadığı gibi, güvenemiyorsunuz da hiçbirine.

    Bu tür ölüm-kalım mücadelelerinde sırtınızı yasladığınız adamlara güvenmeniz çok önemlidir. Örneğin tarihteki bazı savaşlarda 10-20 bin kişilik sağlam bir ordunun 40-80 bin arasındaki düşman ordusunu eze eze mağlup etmesi gibi. Bu ordudaki personelin cesaretine, yeteneklerine ve daha da önemlisi birbirlerine güvenine bağlıdır. Ama bu oyunda bu yok. fazla hümanist ve doğruları daima uygulayan bir irish, cool görünen ama bir halta yaramayan pac, dost mu düşman mı belli olmayan çinli bir kızla beraber savaşıyorsunuz.

    Cod'da bu böyle değil. ne kadar zor durumda olursanız olun, durumun farkında olup size moral vermeye çalışan başgan pırays'ın "haydi millet bitiriyoruz"vari söylemiyle kendinize gelip çılgınlar atabiliyorsunuz. daima sizi gözeten bir büyük abiniz varmışçasına. veya soap'ın profesyonel nişancılığına kendinizi emanet edip 5 askerin arasına korkusuzca dalabiliyorsunuz. ve ne kadar kapana kısılmış olursanız olun, nikolai'nin bir yerlerden bir helikopterle gelip sizi oradan alacağını biliyorsunuz. takım arkadaşlığı önemlidir.

    tıpkı maradona'nın topun nereye atılacağını hissetmiş gibi ardına bakmadan pasın geleceği yere koşup attığı o efsanevi gol gibi.
    sorduklarında "oraya atacağını biliyordum" derken, hissediyorsunuz o takım ruhunu, bir olmayı.

    Tüm bunları göz önüne aldım ve amaçsız şekilde ilerleyişten sıkılıp, az önce tamamladıktan sonra oyunu sildim. Çatışmalardan keyif almakla beraber, 20 metre ötedeki adama tankın otomatik tüfeğiyle defalarca sıkıp öldürememek de nedir? Geçiyor ağacın arkasına ve ölmüyor eşek kadar mermilerle ağaç yıpranmıyor. tank var yahu altınızda, yuh! Oyunun eksikleri var ve bireysel çatışmalar hariç (onların da bazıları) keyif vermeyen bir oyun hikaye moduyla.

    Co-op multi oynamadım, ona güzel diyorlar. Belki bir gün, kim bilir...    … Expand
  38. KillMessiah
    Sep 18, 2016
    5
    One of the most underwhelming, flat out bad SP experiences I have played in a long time. Tons of problems like constantly being forced out of the way where you are standing because NPC's very often have to move where you are standing no matter where it is. Friendly AI stand there and watch while enemies run by firing at them and they do nothing, These are just a couple of problems.

    MP    One of the most underwhelming, flat out bad SP experiences I have played in a long time. Tons of problems like constantly being forced out of the way where you are standing because NPC's very often have to move where you are standing no matter where it is. Friendly AI stand there and watch while enemies run by firing at them and they do nothing, These are just a couple of problems.

    MP was alright though.    … Expand
  39. opengl
    Jun 25, 2016
    6
    The same solid formula has been used for this series for a while now. The level/building destruction is nice but as it plays out in the gameplay mechanics is still not a main feature and offers mostly cinematic value. Where as if someone was hiding behind a wall from your tank in the pre-destruction battlefield games the only difference now is that they will have to hide further back orThe same solid formula has been used for this series for a while now. The level/building destruction is nice but as it plays out in the gameplay mechanics is still not a main feature and offers mostly cinematic value. Where as if someone was hiding behind a wall from your tank in the pre-destruction battlefield games the only difference now is that they will have to hide further back or retreat behind another wall or object to gain protection. In a way this is balancing, but it still feels like there's not much point to leveling a building in BF 4.

    When it came out this game was a non functioning POS and even when it did function the servers would only update the clients 10 times a second which as it turns out is the worst thing you could do to a visceral FPS experience. EA titles should always be approached with caution knowing that their first priority is revenue and having a decent (or functioning) gaming experience is NOT a priority at all. The only reason it got fixed is because nobody would have bought their subsequent battlefield games if their last one was still broken 2 years after release.

    That said... today battlefield 4 is a polished functional and GOOD experience. The formula has been mostly graphically upgraded from BF 3 but the formula remains true. Unfortunately there has really not been enough innovation in modern mainstream video games to render this obsolete.

    So if you're looking for a FPS that involves large numbers of troops fighting as infantry and in vehicles, on good maps, includes some creative strategic thinking, with great graphics, and offers squad play as it's key dynamic its hard to go wrong with battlefield 4.

    The only thing to take note of is that you will encounter in almost any game, players who use cheats to see positions of other players. This is not the same as using the minimap. The most common type shows boxes around each enemy even behind walls and across the map. It is extremely obvious who these players are and often nothing is done about it. Because of this, I'm giving this game 1 point lower of a score. It cannot be overlooked however in the end it is not gamebreaking.    … Expand
  40. Manamaster
    Jun 7, 2016
    5
    There is something missing from the experience, I couldn't enjoy this game as much as I enjoyed BF3 on PS3.
    After buying the Digital Deluxe Edition and having downloaded the extra content that On The House gave away a few weeks ago, I still feel that the game is not as rewarding as previous iterations were.
  41. Shadow1
    May 25, 2016
    6
    This game is worst game in series . In this game bad optimization, graphics almost like in BattleField 3 . In this game terrible gameplay and this game has got high requirements for such graphics . The only thing which is the average in this game this is storyline and it doesn't very good, just average . Bad Game .
  42. matheus2cma
    Apr 13, 2016
    7
    Era pra ser o melhor Battlefield já feito, infelizmente ele foi lançado com dezenas de bugs, a DICE demorou um tempo pra corrigi-los, e conseguiu, deu a volta por cima trazendo até DLC's grátis. Mas o jogo acabou ficando muito mexido, a equipe se perdeu em tantos updates e alterações de gameplays. Outro ponto que BF4 pecou é o seu netcode, dezenas de problemas online, balanceamento deEra pra ser o melhor Battlefield já feito, infelizmente ele foi lançado com dezenas de bugs, a DICE demorou um tempo pra corrigi-los, e conseguiu, deu a volta por cima trazendo até DLC's grátis. Mas o jogo acabou ficando muito mexido, a equipe se perdeu em tantos updates e alterações de gameplays. Outro ponto que BF4 pecou é o seu netcode, dezenas de problemas online, balanceamento de time que nunca foi resolvido mesmo após várias tentativas. É sim um bom jogo, mas pra quem é fã antigo da série se decepcionou muito, vale a pena comprar, mas não vale perder muito tempo jogando, ainda mais com outros Battlefield's melhores ainda "vivos"… Expand
  43. Detraxxx
    Mar 23, 2016
    7
    Fairly well done continuation of The Battlefield franchise, but is filled with bugs and lacks originality. The single player campaign is short but intense. The graphics and many great new maps put this FPS game slightly above average.
  44. Schuback
    Mar 9, 2016
    6
    I'm not a huge fps gamer. In fact I can't remember when was the last time I played one. I did play Duke Nukem, Medal of Honor in the old days... Anyway, decided to give BF4 a try after watching some trailers and man them graphics look awesome. Bought it day one.Took almost a day to download this game and finally.....

    This game has one of the best graphics in an fps I've ever seen.    I'm not a huge fps gamer. In fact I can't remember when was the last time I played one. I did play Duke Nukem, Medal of Honor in the old days... Anyway, decided to give BF4 a try after watching some trailers and man them graphics look awesome. Bought it day one.Took almost a day to download this game and finally.....

    This game has one of the best graphics in an fps I've ever seen. Comparing to it's biggest rival COD, BF4 blows COD out of the freaking water (at least in terms of the graphics)!! The second plus for this game is the factions. Now you also get to play as China! No longer is it going to be America vs AlQaeda this AlQaeda that... America vs Russia. Same sh*t... Now you get something so fresh. Join China and shoot Americans lol. This is what I'd like to see. Different perspectives =)

    Ok, besides graphics and factions, I'd say the shooting mechanics are well done too. The story mode is too scripted and linear but nobody plays it anyway so I won't judge the game by its sp. Overall, Battlefield 4 is a decent shooter with one striking problem that all shooters suffer from. The repetitiveness omgg!! You run, you gun, you camp, you capture locations, you get shot, and you wake up again. Over and over. So in 2 hours you'll be doing the same thing. After 4 hours, still the same...And after 10 hours. mate, it's just the same over and over. I mean, how long do you expect anyone to be doing this?? There's no strategy involved, no cooperation with teammates, no creativity, it's blind and mindless shooting. Lots of people are into that these days. WELL NOT ME!!! Not going to buy an fps anytime soon. And this game was released back in 2013!!    … Expand
  45. ChanandlerBong
    Jan 2, 2016
    5
    Had a lots of fun on this game but unfortunately with new patches and 'fixes' comes new bugs. Further more 'net code' sucks from day one. There has been 'fixes' for 'net code' but actually they didn't fix anything. What they did is nerf weapons damage so when someone starts shooting at you, you'll be able to notice it but there is still that one shot death present despite nerfs.
  46. fluxmulder
    Dec 24, 2015
    6
    Campaign is a joke. But we don't play BF for the campaign so I'll skip to the multiplayer. This is an inherently good squad FPS game, probably the best of it's kind. Solid shooting mechanics and a very robust leveling system. It is let down by bad map design, too few infantry-based maps, and a terrible web browser based matchmaking system. 6/10.
  47. wonderirani
    Nov 16, 2015
    7
    The was very good. Good graphics and smooth. the developers could work better in the story part mostly the end of the game was not i expected or could be. It was not good enough at the end could be very better but over all it was fun playing it and one more thing it was a short game.
  48. Asbest-Men
    Nov 11, 2015
    7
    Скучнейшая в мире сингл-кампания (в отличие от Колды даже кинца и падающих вертолётов нет). Сетевой режим только более глюченный стал. Изменений в графике мало. В общем-то игра неплохая, но по сути топтание на месте, больше простое использование наработок 3ей части не прокатит.Скучнейшая в мире сингл-кампания (в отличие от Колды даже кинца и падающих вертолётов нет). Сетевой режим только более глюченный стал. Изменений в графике мало. В общем-то игра неплохая, но по сути топтание на месте, больше простое использование наработок 3ей части не прокатит.
  49. gattienzo
    Jul 29, 2015
    6
    Más de lo mismo que el bf 3, con mapas menos memorables y con varios errores de jugabilidad como por ejemplo reaparecer en zonas no oportunas. Un modo historia aburrido y también con errores de jugabilidad.
  50. Mefisto_
    Jul 27, 2015
    6
    Quite a time has passed after the game release, and most of the issues are fixed by now. However, you can't escape the past and after all patches which have came out the core of the game can't be changed.

    So what is about it? There are so many gadgets and weapons in this game that around 40% I have not and would not use at all. Why? Because most of them are purposeless or there are    Quite a time has passed after the game release, and most of the issues are fixed by now. However, you can't escape the past and after all patches which have came out the core of the game can't be changed.

    So what is about it? There are so many gadgets and weapons in this game that around 40% I have not and would not use at all. Why? Because most of them are purposeless or there are other options of weapons of perks which are far superior to the rest of the content in the game.

    Map variation is OK, there are a lot of them and you certainly will find a couple which perfectly suit your style or preference.

    Graphics? Nothing too special, even though Shanghai tower falling looks really cool.

    Gameplay and stability? If you look back at the launch state, this game was absolute crap, as I was spending on average 10-15 minutes looking for the server which was not crashing. Moreover, **** net code was adding fuel to the flame confirming that EA pretty much does not care about quality of the product at the release state.

    As I am writing this review now most of the issues were fixed and there are loads of people playing this game, as it is far more attractive than BF Hardline and most of the people are tired of BF 3.

    So, If I was writing this review in 2013, I would give 1-3 just because how bad this game was, but after 2 years passed even bunch of crappy programers could manage fixing big issues, therefore leaving BF 4 at OK state, still with problems like reload bug and unbalanced weapons present.    … Expand
  51. DemonicSoul
    May 24, 2015
    6
    Story: You play as Sgt. Daniel "Reck" Recker--leader of the US Marine squad, Tombstone. With US and Russian conflicts at an all-time high due to the events of BF3--and with China on the verge on siding with the Russians due to the assassination of their leader being blamed on the US--it's up to you and your squad mates to help prevent war from breaking out. As a story, it's not that bad.Story: You play as Sgt. Daniel "Reck" Recker--leader of the US Marine squad, Tombstone. With US and Russian conflicts at an all-time high due to the events of BF3--and with China on the verge on siding with the Russians due to the assassination of their leader being blamed on the US--it's up to you and your squad mates to help prevent war from breaking out. As a story, it's not that bad. The voice acting is once again great; the characters are slightly better and more memorable this time around compared to BF3; and the settings are still nice and varied. Unfortunately, you're still a boring silent protagonist with no personality. Overall, the campaign is better than BF3, but it could still be improved upon. 6/10

    Gameplay: The shooting remains largely the same as in BF3 (although with no stupid panic-knifing enemies), but with the added addition of squad gameplay. Since you lead Tombstone squad, you can spot enemies for them to shoot, and have them enter vehicles and fight with you. You can also change what weapons and gadgets you use in the campaign to suit your play-style. All of the improvements are nice, but the gameplay is still largely the same as before. 6/10

    Graphics: In short, the graphics are everything that made BF3 gorgeous, but made even better and without the annoying blue tint. Although, the vehicle collision and character models can still be better. 9/10

    Sound: DICE is excellent at creating realistic sound designs in their BF games. The sound here is everything from BF3, but once again, made even better. Simple as that. 10/10

    Multiplayer: Unfortunately, the MP here is disappointing when compared to BF3, and it's not because of its launch issues. For starters, the 4 infantry classes from BF3 return with some tweaks made to their arsenal. One big new feature is "Levolution"--a mostly gimmicky feature where each map has a scripted large-scale destruction sequence (like a building collapsing) caused by player action, and it only affects one part of the map. There are also an abundant amount of vehicles--land, air, and sea--to use from with improved unlock orders; Commander mode--a mode where 1 person steps away from the battlefield and gives orders to all squads on a team in hopes of leading them to victory--returns from BF2 with a few new features that might be considered balance issues like highlighting areas with radar; Assignments--challenges from BF3 that rewarded you with guns and customization items--are also available to add more replay value to the game; the suppression was balanced; and there are still a plethora of gadgets to use. There's a lot to like about BF4, but there are also some MAJOR flaws in its system. The game does have 10 maps, but these maps aren't as fun as 3 and often feature plenty of camping spots like the rooftops of buildings where the only way you can get up there is usually with a helicopter; but even then, you'll probably have to deal with a few squads of campers which might lead to a death. Outside of conquest, these maps mostly SUCK for other modes like Deathmatches or Rush. And speaking of modes, there is a lack of new game modes here. Besides Conquest, Rush, Deathmatches, and Domination (rip-off of CoD's domination mode), there are only 2 new ones, and both flopped. There's Defuse--BF4's attempted response to CoD's Search and Destroy mode that failed--and Obliteration--a "CoD Sabatage-style" mode with 3 bombs on both sides that flops because of the large map size, and the limitation of only 1 bomb carrier; so if you spawn far away from him, the mode becomes a running simulator since you'll have to get up to where the action's happening. The counter-knife system--where if you knife a guy in the front, a QTE pops up--sucks, but 4's BIGGEST sin is it's progression system. For starters, there are an excessive amount of guns to choose from, and while it's good for allowing more customization for the player, there's so many guns that they all start to feel the same. Why would I need 9 different sniper rifles if they all perform the same? It's like DICE copied and pasted several gun stats and merely changed the looks. And unlike BF3, you DON'T unlock guns by progressing your class as the 2 are separate. This means you HAVE to get kills with that gun class in order to unlock more guns. With all classes that have the last gun at somewhere in-between 48K-83K, you would need HUNDREDS of gun kills and assists in order to progress. This is all on top of that same stupid attachment progression system from 3. There are also Battlepacks--packs of random loot from attachments to XP boosts--that are very much unnecessary and almost pay-to-win due to the awful progression system. This game, essentially, is a major GRIND-FEST that only gets fun once you have everything you wanted unlocked, and good luck with that. 6/10

    Verdict: The game had promise, but with a grind-y progression system, and maps that only work for Conquest, Conquestfield 4 disappoints.

    Rating: 6/10    … Expand
  52. LeGod
    Feb 15, 2015
    6
    None of the top critic reviewers really had to balls to mark this game down to something which is a bit more reflective of the state of the game. yes when it works it is good, but you can't keep awarding high scores to games which are just plain broken. it really does seem like the creators of this game are taking the piss charging this sort of price and then having the cheek to get theirNone of the top critic reviewers really had to balls to mark this game down to something which is a bit more reflective of the state of the game. yes when it works it is good, but you can't keep awarding high scores to games which are just plain broken. it really does seem like the creators of this game are taking the piss charging this sort of price and then having the cheek to get their players to buy dlc when the game isn't even fixed. its a sad reflection of where we are right now with videogames, someone has to make a point and take a stand because with the way things are going right now if you keep rewarding games with high marks that aren't in a state to even be released then the industry will never get better! i'm looking at you ign, gamespot and destructoid! stop giving these broken games so much credit! because if you do then what happens, people buy it regardless of the faults it has and it encourages similar behaviour within the industry, suddenly everyone thinks "hey its ok to release a game that really isn't finished properly because that triple A game did and it still got high marks". and what happens with games with high marks? they sell well and nothing changes.
    I know this game is all about multi player but someone should really address just how bad the campaign was, it was a woefully bad experience! it was like watching one of the worst movies you've ever seen.
    the single player campaign could have done with much more work. and again, this is something that most reviewers just don't care to mark down, like this part of the game never exists. its still a component of the game, even if most people buy it for the multiplayer the solo side should still have a large amount of consideration. when you add these two bad gameplay experiences together it should impact the overall score significantly enough to drop it down from good to average.
    i'm not going to give this something ridiculous like 0 because it has merits and there are a lot of good things that reviewers did pick up on and that I agree with but I am giving this a lower score than what the average critics gave it as I think thats correct and fair in light of its flaws.
    I seriously hope they fired the people responsible for dragging this game down and employ some people who can do the job properly to work on hardline. if hardline is anything like this then make a point of NOT buying it. they've got to win people back by showing they are capable of providing a gaming experience that is worth your money.    … Expand
  53. Supat97
    Jan 24, 2015
    7
    So Here My Break Down for BF4

    Story:5/10 In BF4 Your job would be much more difficult if the evil Russian and Chinese soldiers has learned a modicum of tactical awareness. But maybe the ease of which you pick them off and sneak by them is on purpose. They swarm as if they were pins at the end of a bowling ball lane, next to combustive barrels, no less. You create a wall of bullets and    So Here My Break Down for BF4

    Story:5/10
    In BF4 Your job would be much more difficult if the evil Russian and Chinese soldiers has learned a modicum of tactical awareness. But maybe the ease of which you pick them off and sneak by them is on purpose. They swarm as if they were pins at the end of a bowling ball lane, next to combustive barrels, no less. You create a wall of bullets and they keep walking into it, as if they were simply the catalysts for your explosive creations.But Sadly Campaign So Short And Uninteresting Like BF3 With Problem With AI Issue.

    Multiplayer 7/10
    Like BF3 This Thing Is a Selling Points Even without the 64-player count, the fact that every mode in BF4 has more players means there are more enemies for you to shoot at, more people to heal, and resupply you – and probably the most important part: people squatting on vehicles won’t bog down a match to molasses.

    Gameplay 8/10
    Graphics In BF4 Blow My Mind Gameplay and graphics are both beautiful and Sound So Realistic Even On Low-PC Gaming Spec

    Performance 6/10 (5.5 If Possible)
    Unfortunately,the most annoying and nasty issue that lots of players have been harping on about – and with good reason – is the game just not working as intended. By this, I mean, the big “Battlefield 4 Has Stop Working” crash that will boot you out of the game completely. Another issue related to this is Sever Crashing, booting you out of matches for no good reason, and the occasional Unbalanced Gameplay,Overpowered Weapon and Netcode Issue Mostly On PC.

    Final Verdict : 7.3/10
    The BF4 Is a My Great Shooters Of all Time Unfortunately With All Problem In BF4 As BF Hatred Bandwagon Grow Stronger In Fact DICE have thrown the game out into the public with a lot of broken strings that after 1 Years and 3 months after release DICE LA has fixed Most Problem it in the newest update. They really do their job well and are saving BF4 from being a buggy unbalanced disaster That Only Time Will Tells Fate of BF.    … Expand
  54. RealJPVBV
    Jan 21, 2015
    6
    I have played this game and it is very buggy. Random FPS spikes and weird glitches. I only played this game for multiplayer. I experience the long loading screens which takes somewhere around 1-3 mins. The worst part is the game breaking glitch which is when you join a match it disconnects you. You have to connect to the server 2-5 times in order to join a game. There is no fix for thisI have played this game and it is very buggy. Random FPS spikes and weird glitches. I only played this game for multiplayer. I experience the long loading screens which takes somewhere around 1-3 mins. The worst part is the game breaking glitch which is when you join a match it disconnects you. You have to connect to the server 2-5 times in order to join a game. There is no fix for this bug. I recommend to not expect a good time when playing this game on pc.… Expand
  55. Nerocz1
    Dec 14, 2014
    6
    Campaign: Nice but completely unecessary add-on for BF4. In every location you have to kill every enemy just to move forward. This make this game campaign almost unplayable, i was discusted after 2 missions. No More of BF single-players please.
  56. Cloudom
    Dec 11, 2014
    7
    DICE stuck to their roots with Battlefield 4. The game felt like a pretty fresh experience, at least for an FPS, that was until I realised how unfinished the game is.

    First, this game is flawed. The gameplay is good, the maps are very hit and miss, but generally very enjoyable and the graphics are very nice. However, DICE have thrown the game out into the public with a lot of broken    DICE stuck to their roots with Battlefield 4. The game felt like a pretty fresh experience, at least for an FPS, that was until I realised how unfinished the game is.

    First, this game is flawed. The gameplay is good, the maps are very hit and miss, but generally very enjoyable and the graphics are very nice. However, DICE have thrown the game out into the public with a lot of broken strings that, even after 14 months after release, still haven't bothered to fix. Instead, they decide to waste time whining on how EA robbed them while releasing mediocre DLC's that most people do not care for. This game is technically good and my negative views on it may be seen as nit-picking, but trust me, it is not. Many times I have had to give up playing due to problems that have overly complicated fixes that numerous purchasers have become victim to.

    Despite this, the game is pretty much everything it looks on the outside. Its your typical addicting, eye candy military shooter. I admit that I didn't play the campaign but after Battlefield 3 it was clear where the ambition was, which is the multiplayer. If you know anything about modern FPS game's you probably know how the successful Battlefield formula works. Each map has typically about 32 to 64 slots, depending on the gamemode. The most popular gamemode is the conquest gamemode where two opposing sides must hold as different points of the map as they can to decrease the amount of tickets lost, the first team to reach 0 tickets loses. The maps are large and look stunning. As previously mentioned the map designs are very hit and miss. Some maps are very well designed, such as the brilliant Siege of Shanghai, a typical city map separated by the incredibly large and well designed skyscraper in the middle. This maps standouts out as it accomplishes the feeling of challenge when trying to capture or defend each point, all of which are very well designed. However, even this map if flawed after the skycraper falls as a 'levelution' which definitely was a poor design choice. The desert/warehouse setting of Zavod is also an excellent map which held some of my most intense and fondest moments of playing these games. These aside, BF4 suffers from a lot of poor map design, ranging from the messy and incomplete Hainan Resort to the claustrophobic and dull Operation Locker. The maps really don't balance out and the brilliant maps do not make up for the embarrassingly shocking ones.

    The new content is also limited. Not much feels new, this may be a bit unfair since I did not play Battlefield 3 that much, but I felt as though I wasn't getting my $90 worth playing it. This point feels a bit unfair as it's pretty much what's expected for a sequel to a successful multiplayer FPS but its jump from its predecessor feels small compared to what BF3 did from BF2.

    As negative as this review may feel, I actually had quite a blast playing this game. It definitely won't a game I see myself coming back to in the near future but it served it purpose well in delivery a fast paced, gorgeous FPS that I can see fans enjoying. For me however, the games bugs and numerous problems make the game more frustrating than it should be.    … Expand
  57. Expospeed
    Dec 7, 2014
    5
    BF4 is basically a patch for the previous game - nothing innovative here. My breakdown is as follows:

    1. Graphics: 8/10 - excellent as before, even on low-end rigs
    2. Gameplay: 7/10 - great controls and satisfying experience with good sound effects
    3. Story: 2/10 - not interesting or engaging at all
    4. Multiplayer: 2/10 - stuttering, lag, and crashes

    Overall, average game.
  58. brofenix
    Dec 6, 2014
    6
    No Capture the Flag mode by default :( Only with paid DLC can you get Capture the Flag, and this is the most fun mode in my opinion. Good game, taxing on computer so is a little laggy. In general, hard game I die quite a bit. Hard to get into on multiplayer, bleh will move to Guild Wars 2
  59. DrVarsims
    Nov 21, 2014
    7
    This is a very good game, just don't bother with any of the expansions/dlcs which no one plays 1-2 months after release. If you only want to play Conquest mode on the stock maps then go ahead and get this game, though 1-2 years from now (fall 2014) you will only be able to find a dozen servers running.
  60. ClipState
    Nov 20, 2014
    7
    This game is not the game we expected. Sure it has its strengths in multiplayer but its single player campaign was just utterly disappointing. I didn't think they could actually make something worse in this game than its predecessor. The best part about the campaign was the hit markers and scoring. This at least gave it an arcade style feel to a campaign which wasn't even worth playing. ItThis game is not the game we expected. Sure it has its strengths in multiplayer but its single player campaign was just utterly disappointing. I didn't think they could actually make something worse in this game than its predecessor. The best part about the campaign was the hit markers and scoring. This at least gave it an arcade style feel to a campaign which wasn't even worth playing. It was bearable by all means but compared to BF3 or even Call of Duty, it falls horribly short. I found myself pushing my way through it just for the gamerscore. Moving on, the multiplayer was a big improvement. Not huge - but big enough to give it a new feel. The larger, more open maps made the game better. The weapons and customization options were pretty good but it still feels the same. The gameplay didn't take too much of a step forward. Still, overall its a fun game and people should still be playing it a lot for now.… Expand
  61. King_Scorpion
    Nov 10, 2014
    7
    Great multiplayer. Poor Short campaign. Stunning visuals and graphic. The sound is great and realistic. You can experience huge battles in great BF multiplayer. the biggest problem of the game is bug.
  62. onux
    Nov 7, 2014
    7
    Revising my initial review after the latest patch. The movement and weapon handling are much better. Still issues with hit reg but not nearly as bad.

    The maps are probably the biggest issue for me, they just don't flow as well as previous games. However BF4 is a good game in many ways. Suggestions for future releases: 1. Have a core collection of maps that are always available,    Revising my initial review after the latest patch. The movement and weapon handling are much better. Still issues with hit reg but not nearly as bad.

    The maps are probably the biggest issue for me, they just don't flow as well as previous games. However BF4 is a good game in many ways.

    Suggestions for future releases:
    1. Have a core collection of maps that are always available, community favourites.
    2. Allow the music to be turned off please! It's depressing.    … Expand
  63. HardwarePal
    Oct 20, 2014
    7
    The game sadly still has problems after just over a year of release. It looks great and when its actually playable (when bugs dont crash your system) its really enjoyable. Sadly EA forced Dice to release BF4, something damaging to the next releases for the series. Care for your customer first then profits.
  64. Macanoodough
    Oct 16, 2014
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I originally reviewed favorably when this game came out. However, after a year before they finally fixed the bugs, that was a premature review. I really thought they would have been more diligent in the fixes. As well, since the Expansions are all forced on you and no permission for open modding was ever implemented, I have to revise my original review.
    The expansions are more apt to lag and experience tech problems
    Other Cons are Spawning Locations, Melee Takedowns/Counters, OP Armor/Air, Small squad sizes and limited commander functions/communications and most of all, the Game Modes. In Regular, their is no Friendly Fire, and in Hardcore, the game is unplayable on the expansive maps thanks to snipers being so OP. If you set a server to Custom to tailor the game to your liking, it becomes unplayable due to lag. If you have a Ranked server, you will not populate as fast as an Official server, but if you are an Official server you cannot Admin to maintain fair play or customize a map rotation. Unfortunately, none of these issues were ever addressed or fixed.    … Expand
  65. Sharky0922
    Sep 27, 2014
    7
    Best FPS ever atm.

    Have many issues but there is no better one to counter it.

    My main problem with this game that their development is going towards COD.
    ANd thats not good sign.
    They try to take COD market while ignoring their fanbase.
  66. leemanfor
    Sep 9, 2014
    7
    Having played around 250 hours of BF4 multiplayer, I feel I have a good view of the game.

    The Pros: Good choice of weapons Ability to use DMR/Shotgun/Carbine for any class Good graphics decent load times Large maps Large map choices The Cons: Netcode is still messed up Some weapons are overpowered. Plenty of bugs even after a year. Now, I only play Hardcore so I can't    Having played around 250 hours of BF4 multiplayer, I feel I have a good view of the game.

    The Pros:
    Good choice of weapons
    Ability to use DMR/Shotgun/Carbine for any class
    Good graphics
    decent load times
    Large maps
    Large map choices

    The Cons:
    Netcode is still messed up
    Some weapons are overpowered.
    Plenty of bugs even after a year.

    Now, I only play Hardcore so I can't really comment too much on the Normal version. but I feel that Battlefield 4 is a great first person shooter, that falls a bit short in some areas. Compared to its predecessor, BF3, Battlefield 4 doesn't stand out.    … Expand
  67. Dragon_Fly
    Aug 22, 2014
    6
    I gave this game a 6 in comparison to BF3. The nice thing about this game is that players now have the option of spectating games that allows them to observe suspicious players. People no longer have to wonder who is hacking... It actually shocked me that I have discovered servers that I performed extremely poor on had almost nothing but hackers with modified skins and movementsI gave this game a 6 in comparison to BF3. The nice thing about this game is that players now have the option of spectating games that allows them to observe suspicious players. People no longer have to wonder who is hacking... It actually shocked me that I have discovered servers that I performed extremely poor on had almost nothing but hackers with modified skins and movements uncharacteristic to normal play. They can also now be aware when they are being observed and they will literally sit still... which in the least part is a heck of a way to grief cheaters trying to hide their cheats.

    They also added what I nearly forgot existed all the way back from Battlefield 2142 the Commander slot in battles. Commanders can be devastating for matches yet very few want to play the role as it is not exactly exciting when most people do not follow orders... but one can progress in rank quick from being a Commander. It sure does suck when your opposing team has an Commander and the other team doesn't; the Commander's team usually wins...

    One thing I did not like in this game was the new vehicle set-up. Jets seemingly lose control when I start firing; they simply stall out in the air and I lose my positioning for a kill. Manipulating the throttle to increase turning speed has been significantly gimped; when the throttle over exerted the plane literally stops turning entirely as if it lost all of it's wind. They also put in several different types of Guns for the jet and it makes spotting cheaters damn near impossible when the 30 mm cannon naturally does too much damage. The Miniguns on the Transport Heli no longer harm Tanks; as if they really did any serious damage in BF3. They are now good for killing soldiers and eventually bringing down other flying vehicles.

    All in All BF2 is still the best game. They do too much with this franchise and it has now become exclusively all about the money and it really irritates me that they have already created Battlefield Hardline.

    This may be the official last Battlefield Game I ever buy... purely for the fact that they keep rebuilding the beast... if they want to go this far then they should just make it a P2P MMO.

    When I look at it statistically, this game comes out at about $70 retail and then people wind up paying another $100 for all the: expansions, Weapon Kit Shortcuts and Premium status; the shortcut kits have been designed to be more useful in such a way because items are practically random now from the suitcase bundles...

    They've already duped us into paying $15/month to play this game without them being held accountable for all of the Hackers running Injectable code cheats in this game.

    Look at the release date, this game isn't even a year old yet and it's already being phased out by Battlefield Hardline; which is a whole new kind of garbage...

    Talk about encouraging the existence of a Police State and Criminals with Guerrilla Military style weapons. It's just not right to advocate the killing of Police...ever...    … Expand
  68. bdkn87
    Aug 20, 2014
    7
    This game was broken when it was first released. But now the netcode has been fixed so that hits register faster. It's starting to feel almost as smooth as CoD games when it comes to shooting. But better than CoD, on conquest this game is huge and relies on teamwork to win. There are tons of vehicles and a balanced team is really importance. But you can still play small infantry only mapsThis game was broken when it was first released. But now the netcode has been fixed so that hits register faster. It's starting to feel almost as smooth as CoD games when it comes to shooting. But better than CoD, on conquest this game is huge and relies on teamwork to win. There are tons of vehicles and a balanced team is really importance. But you can still play small infantry only maps and those are still fun. Play with five of your friends in a squad and there's no better gaming experience.

    But they really needed specific maps for Rush. It's so unbalanced, offense usually has no chance. Rush mode on BF3 was good, and Rush on BC2 was near perfect. Considering that Rush is my favorite mode, I was really disappointed.

    Overall, still a good game    … Expand
  69. rscl
    Aug 16, 2014
    5
    This game delivered the average single player experience I would have expected from a multiplayer-focused game. Although the game included cutscenes and cheesy dialogue, it was interesting enough to keep playing.
    Beside the game having great looks, this time around you were able to complete the missions without being controlled towards a certain outcome. It felt more like the usual fps    This game delivered the average single player experience I would have expected from a multiplayer-focused game. Although the game included cutscenes and cheesy dialogue, it was interesting enough to keep playing.
    Beside the game having great looks, this time around you were able to complete the missions without being controlled towards a certain outcome. It felt more like the usual fps shooter - in a good way.
    Still too linear though, and pointless.    … Expand
  70. Banhammer0
    Aug 12, 2014
    6
    Decent.
    While it's visually stunning and has a lot of content in store it has many HUGE flaws.
    For one, it's basically HALF of a game until you decide to pay for premium (which is 50 euroes I think). Second it has ridiculously slow gridny leveling (and unlocking) forcing you to buy premium (more unlocks) or pay for unlocks (another ~40 euroes). In 6 weeks of playing it I have unlocked    Decent.
    While it's visually stunning and has a lot of content in store it has many HUGE flaws.
    For one, it's basically HALF of a game until you decide to pay for premium (which is 50 euroes I think).
    Second it has ridiculously slow gridny leveling (and unlocking) forcing you to buy premium (more unlocks) or pay for unlocks (another ~40 euroes). In 6 weeks of playing it I have unlocked maybe 1/4 of what it has to offer (or buy).
    Third it's just not really fun. That's the biggest flaw. All the weapons are clones of each other. Maps are boring with map destruction being crap (fun to look at but it's actually a detriment to gameplay).
    Vehicles own everything and there is still no system for assigning them to players, so you have to camp for it and get lucky if you want one.
    Voice acting is surprisingly **** bad. Sound effects are pretty good, and like mentioned above graphics are of the highest possible quality, inducing erection in you for a few weeks until you get used to it.

    Nah for me it's a good game ruined by massive greed, just another one to add to EA's **** titles list.
    6/10    … Expand
  71. ns0l
    Aug 11, 2014
    7
    The expectations were high, because it looks amazing on the videos. Can my PC handle that game? Well the multiplayer is amazing, but the campaign is something to forget.
  72. Xenitt
    Jul 20, 2014
    7
    Overall, I am fairly impressed with the new installment of the BF series, but it just barely makes a 7 out of 10. The game was executed very well, and some of the biggest innovation was to be found in multiplayer, particularly in vehicle combat. But even with some of the changes made, BF4 feels more like a DLC than anything.

    Sure, the graphics have been given a bit of a boost, and    Overall, I am fairly impressed with the new installment of the BF series, but it just barely makes a 7 out of 10. The game was executed very well, and some of the biggest innovation was to be found in multiplayer, particularly in vehicle combat. But even with some of the changes made, BF4 feels more like a DLC than anything.

    Sure, the graphics have been given a bit of a boost, and overall the gameplay feels great, but it doesn't even scratch the surface compared to BF3, when it comes to the campaign. While the campaign was enjoyable, it felt more driven by gameplay, and fast-paced action, rather than story. And, in the end, I couldn't remember anyone's name, or how it even ended. However, I digress, as I know not everyone is quite as into the campaign as I am.

    As far as multiplayer goes, I have only a few complaints, the main one is level design. The maps in BF4 are great, but they aren't quite as memorable as some of the maps from BF3, like Caspian Border, and Kharg Island among others. However, others may feel differently, this is my personal opinion, anyway.

    Lastly, I feel one of the main problems with the game, even now, is the netcode. I am no expert in netcode, but when 95% of my kills/deaths are due to crossfire, and getting shot around corners, we have a problem. I think this is something that Dice really needs to focus on, as it really is a game-killer.

    Overall, I would've given BF4 a higher score, but I am already being pretty generous, considering the fact that EA pushed this game out early, even though it wasn't even finished. And even to this day, it features a wide array of issues, which could have been avoided, given a little bit of extra time.    … Expand
  73. CaptainMushroom
    Jul 13, 2014
    7
    Battlefield 4 is the sequel to the game Battlefield 4 which shook up the FPS genre and made room for competition. Sadly enough Battlefield 4 lacks at certain moments, the singleplayer was made without much thought and contains game-breaking bugs here and there. The multiplayer is OK, but is also buggy, and worse than BF3's multiplayer. I liked the underwater areas in MP though. There is noBattlefield 4 is the sequel to the game Battlefield 4 which shook up the FPS genre and made room for competition. Sadly enough Battlefield 4 lacks at certain moments, the singleplayer was made without much thought and contains game-breaking bugs here and there. The multiplayer is OK, but is also buggy, and worse than BF3's multiplayer. I liked the underwater areas in MP though. There is no obvious graphical inprovement, so you are better off sticking to Battlefield 3. Also, there's no 32bit support for older machines.… Expand
  74. Dethstar
    Jun 26, 2014
    7
    Re writing my review. Many of the bugs are now removed. Unfortunately it still uses Origin which doesn't so I cant give it a higher rating as the game is hampered by the poor delivery method. However, the game now realises the potential of the excellent game engine.

    With the full range of DLC the game has a lot more variety and comes into its own. The use of jets is still    Re writing my review. Many of the bugs are now removed. Unfortunately it still uses Origin which doesn't so I cant give it a higher rating as the game is hampered by the poor delivery method. However, the game now realises the potential of the excellent game engine.

    With the full range of DLC the game has a lot more variety and comes into its own.

    The use of jets is still problematic and never really got well integrated into the game and hacking continues to be the greatest problem of the game.

    However, a new feature addresses one of the most fundamental problems of the previous game. Hit detection and other issues often referred to as "the crap netcode". While not being a panacea this has certainly helped a lot. There is still a huge amount of hacking and sadly many servers seem to allow it. A more pro active server admin community could have helped to nip this early but generally speaking server admins seem to have been poor caretakers of BF4.

    Cheats will always be one step ahead but if you can find a good server and find a way through the mess that is origin to buy the game (or simply get your codes elsewhere and redeem them). Then BF4 is now a mature title that is a must have for any fps fan. There really is nothing like the Frostbyte 2 Engine and even the new hardline doesn't use it nearly so well.

    If it wasn't for the problematic Origin then this would be a 10 from me.    … Expand
  75. Karnivool
    Jun 21, 2014
    6
    Remember how good Battlefield 3 was? me too. Don't get me wrong, if you are looking for your fix of Battlefield or just an FPS in general, Battlefield 4 delivers that experience, very inconsistently.

    Still to this day you will join a server on BF4 and there will be players gliding across the screen due to a horrible connection, you will be piling bullets into peoples faces for them    Remember how good Battlefield 3 was? me too. Don't get me wrong, if you are looking for your fix of Battlefield or just an FPS in general, Battlefield 4 delivers that experience, very inconsistently.

    Still to this day you will join a server on BF4 and there will be players gliding across the screen due to a horrible connection, you will be piling bullets into peoples faces for them just to turn around and drop you like a sack of bricks.

    Now EA and DICE have rolled out patch after patch, steadily the game is getting better but still, to be this far into the game and still to have some major problems? that's unacceptable. The one thing you will notice though, is that all of these problems are server based.

    If you can get beyond the inconsistencies of the game connection, there is still a lot of fun to be had. The graphics are as usual, brilliant, the audio through-out the game is incredible, seriously, play a game of large conquest with some headphones on, I guarantee you, you may soil yourself. OK maybe not, but you get the jist of it.

    I gave Battlefield a 6/10 for a reason. Had I done this review a few months back, the score would of been a lot lower and you could possibly say that I could return to this review in a few months and the game will be worth a higher rating. I seriously doubt you will be disappointed if you are a Battlefield fan and you have yet to pick this up, the game still give you hours of entertainment, even more if you get a group of friends on.

    Just beware of those damn servers.    … Expand
  76. AlexanderMV
    Jun 14, 2014
    6
    Well, the price of the game still is very high for the real value, the graphics are oddly lower than Battlefield 3 ones, don't ask me why, and the scenarios and maps are not so detailed like in BF3, the loadings of the game are extremely long for no reason, and there are much more bugs in BF4, bugs that compromise the physics of the game, that are not so good too, the story is very simpleWell, the price of the game still is very high for the real value, the graphics are oddly lower than Battlefield 3 ones, don't ask me why, and the scenarios and maps are not so detailed like in BF3, the loadings of the game are extremely long for no reason, and there are much more bugs in BF4, bugs that compromise the physics of the game, that are not so good too, the story is very simple and direct with a short campaing of 4-5 hours, i personally liked the voice acting and the gameplay but the game leaves much to be desired, the game doesn't worth all the money that we paid, at least the developers are still trying to fix the game problems, some problems like the netcode have already been fixed. If the game is finally fixed i will rewrite this review. Thanks for the attention and sorry for my english.… Expand
  77. JIELM
    May 21, 2014
    7
    The Positives:

    This game is a fun cruize from the wonder the 3rd gave us. The weapons feels better and its more fun to unlock new ones, contrasting the 3rd game where i lost track of my unlocks at level 70. On top of that, the amount of customisations have been grately fleshed out. The weapons feels more personal as a result, which is a great improvement. The levolution is amazing, much    The Positives:

    This game is a fun cruize from the wonder the 3rd gave us. The weapons feels better and its more fun to unlock new ones, contrasting the 3rd game where i lost track of my unlocks at level 70. On top of that, the amount of customisations have been grately fleshed out. The weapons feels more personal as a result, which is a great improvement. The levolution is amazing, much more fun than the (Lets be fair now) underwhelming destructables the third tried to blow us away with. The atmosphere is beautiful, not as good as the trailers made it out to be, but i can live with it. And its still much better than the third game, which always made me feel like having a sudden faint on a painfully bright summer day. Love the new cover mechanic, very usefull in tight corner situations, makes operation metro actually playable. The game constantly keeps you on your toes, 9 minutes each team deathmach makes the game easy to just pick upp and play 30 minutes before going to work

    The Negtatives:

    I absolutely HATE the constant crashes on dawnbraker, its simply a disaster thet these ones still happens 6 MONTHS AFTER ITS RELEASE!. But most of the negative aspects for me rests on the fact that this game underdelivers, considering its heritage. For example, (and this was a problem in the third game as well). The maps arent realy that big. Remember Bandar Desert in Battlefield 3? It was said to be the biggest map in battlefield history. My main point is, that that should be the OVERALL size of ALL the maps in both these games. Where did the MASSIVE areas that Battlefield 1942 gave us go? The game is called Battlefield! So where is the battleFIELDS?! On top of that, the conquests are way to short. A conquest lasts most times only 15 minutes. 15 MINUTES! What the hell! A Battlefield 1942 game could clock into over 40 minutes. A big letdown to those who hoped that the grapical wonders of this new game would go with the franchise an actually improve the game on all aspects

    This game is still a great shooter game. Its still fun to play. The weapons feels better and most of the gameplay mechanics are an improvement from the third game. The downside is the crashes that should have been fixed long ago, preferable BEFORE RELEASE. The maps are small compared to the older games. The music is still a load of farting noices barely recembeling the epic trumpet of battlefield 1942. And the maps is still way to small to overcome the feeling that game gave us. I know it's bold to compare this with so much older games, but my point is that this game should not be outowned by the old battlefield 1942 i ANY AREAS. Overall, a good, unfortunately underwhelming, shooter that keeps you on your toes and never gets boring to play.

    PS: In the 5th game, i expect to be able to control SHIP CRUIZERS! Don't disapoint me.    … Expand
  78. CharcoalBurst
    May 11, 2014
    5
    I gave it 5/10 because of the graphics. That's it. Lots of crashes, boring maps. Mantle doesn't work the way it was advertized. Servers are full of exploiters/cheaters EA won't do anything against. It's hard to enjoy this game without playing it in hardcore mode because of that. The netcode is not on par with a game that is supposed to be at the top of PC gaming. Bought the premium editionI gave it 5/10 because of the graphics. That's it. Lots of crashes, boring maps. Mantle doesn't work the way it was advertized. Servers are full of exploiters/cheaters EA won't do anything against. It's hard to enjoy this game without playing it in hardcore mode because of that. The netcode is not on par with a game that is supposed to be at the top of PC gaming. Bought the premium edition and haven't even found the courage to try the last DLC which is told to blow like the two others that came before.… Expand
  79. oilreg
    May 7, 2014
    7
    if i would have needed to write a review about BF4 the first 3 months i would give it a rating of 4 Max, cause Dice released a game which was broken and unfinished at best. Most of us had constant crashes all over the place and we coudlnt even finish a single round.
    After now a good 6+ Month we have to admit that they finally fixed most most of the stuff, (insane long time period thou)    if i would have needed to write a review about BF4 the first 3 months i would give it a rating of 4 Max, cause Dice released a game which was broken and unfinished at best. Most of us had constant crashes all over the place and we coudlnt even finish a single round.
    After now a good 6+ Month we have to admit that they finally fixed most most of the stuff, (insane long time period thou) ... So those issues aside, BF4 is great to play if you love teamplay, however the the whole release is more like a BF3 DLC with a new name, graphics didnt get much better and the levolution they announced sooo big is more a fake, its tru big building fall, but its always the same so there is no AI to it, its more like a general map has two stages, one with all in tact, and one where most of the environment is destroyed. All over still a great game, but they way it was sold to us, and they horrible state it was delivered, should give them a big downrating, cause afterall it was a big cheat, imho    … Expand
  80. Sensless
    May 1, 2014
    5
    The new water system, dynamic maps, commander mode, and the improved effects are nice in Battlefield 4, but EA needs to slow down with the DLC. a high-end title should get no more than 3 DLC's, and DLC should be for an efficient price, and have actual content to offer. There are still many bugs in the game, even after the beta.
  81. morfil
    Apr 29, 2014
    6
    It's been 2 months now and things just keep getting worse with each update. Don't believe me? Go check the Battlefield/Battlelog forums yourself. Hundreds, if not thousands of posts with problems and people wanting their money back.
  82. Drastre
    Apr 28, 2014
    7
    A fun and enjoyable enough military shooter. The campaign is suprisingly decent but, the thing you buy Battlefield multiplayer. It is fun but, it lags too often which is a big issue. Overall, good game.
  83. Iimonster297
    Apr 23, 2014
    7
    A huge fan of Battlefield franchise is frustrated from Battlefield 4 speaking to his heart. I couldn't encounter perfect applies of the previous Battlefields. Battlefield 4 contains technical problems-bugs, poor service, mechanics cannot fit to Battlefield 4's benefits.
  84. ihatecheez
    Apr 19, 2014
    5
    biggest disappointment and i totally regret buying it day one, for this day i am never buying another EA game. the game was a mess when it launched and it still is today.
  85. RangerRivet
    Apr 13, 2014
    7
    This game is amazing. Everyone whines because they have to actually WORK to get their guns, and work for their vehicles, hell, they WANT a pay to win model. Battlefield isn't about that, battlefield is about playing for long periods. I will agree, they need to work on disconnect problems and I agree that unlocking could go a little faster, but 99% of the people who are whining with theirThis game is amazing. Everyone whines because they have to actually WORK to get their guns, and work for their vehicles, hell, they WANT a pay to win model. Battlefield isn't about that, battlefield is about playing for long periods. I will agree, they need to work on disconnect problems and I agree that unlocking could go a little faster, but 99% of the people who are whining with their 0/10 review simply get killed all the time and blame the game. That's the bottom line.… Expand
  86. Infaereld
    Apr 12, 2014
    7
    Good points: Fun, challenging, lots of maps, destructive environment and weapon/vehicle selection good.
    Bad points: Lack of variety in game modes during online play, still buggy, can't see much progress since BF3.
    Overall an enjoyable experience but still much of the same.
  87. R00TKILL
    Apr 4, 2014
    6
    Things are getting better in this game, some improvements are being made but I still think BF3 still takes the lead fair and square on the User Ratings. I have two things on my mind that could vastly improve the gameplay and that's 1. Balance the AIR,GROUND,SEA Vehicles/Planes. 2. Give us some better guns, I mean you have the AK's covered for sure but the AR game is mucked up, the M4Things are getting better in this game, some improvements are being made but I still think BF3 still takes the lead fair and square on the User Ratings. I have two things on my mind that could vastly improve the gameplay and that's 1. Balance the AIR,GROUND,SEA Vehicles/Planes. 2. Give us some better guns, I mean you have the AK's covered for sure but the AR game is mucked up, the M4 shoots only Semi and Burst... wtf is that! They always put a stupid HK416 piston gun in the game for once put a LWRC M6 varient or even a LMT MRP, If your going to go Direct Impingement go Noveske or KAC. Other than that they still has some issues with hackers and getting hung up on broken tree stumps and collapsed buildings is a new annoying things to deal with.… Expand
  88. Teers98
    Apr 2, 2014
    7
    Battlefield 4 has an awesome Multiplayer but it's not as good as Battlefield 3. It has great Graphics but the Campaign is **** because EA just produced the Game for the Multiplayer. Of course, the Multiplayer is great but next time they should really make a better Story! Anyway it's a great game but as i said, not as good as Battlefield 3 in my Opinion.
  89. Officerjmiller
    Apr 1, 2014
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. WOO bf4 bf4 bf4!!!!! That is what I said when I was installing the game, and then the crashes started. I've had this game since release and until now I have been a blind EA/Dice fanboy telling myself that, "Oh, they will fix the crashing, Oh, every game starts out buggy and glitchy" But it has been 6 MONTHS.....6 MONTHS AND I STILL CANNOT JOIN THE DAMN MULTIPLAYER WITHOUT THE CONSTANT CRASHES. I bought premium that costed 80$ I can understand if this is a 15 indie game developed by a schizophrenic cat, but a multimillion/billion company? Unacceptable.

    The game is damn fun when you can play it, the guns sound and feel good, the vehicles (when they are not glitching and teleporting around from bugs) are fun to play around with, the counter knifing is awesome :D, the maps are varied and fun to play around in, and the levolution is pretty and at times can change the whole course of the match. The graphics...we don't need to talk about them...you all know.

    The game is very fun and i like it alot, but the blatant lack of finishing the game and very bad attempts at fixing it, bumped your score down to a 5. THIS IS IN APRIL 2014....AND YOU STILL HAVENT FIXED IT. The last "update" now doesnt even let me join the game. Solid job guys.    … Expand
  90. c_woolley
    Mar 21, 2014
    7
    I would give this game a 10 if it were based on the content alone; however it falls short due to the common EA pitfall. The game started with critical patching needs. Most of these have been taken care of, but there are a few that still need to be worked out. EA has always been known for releasing products based on dates and fail when it comes to release of a polished product. It isI would give this game a 10 if it were based on the content alone; however it falls short due to the common EA pitfall. The game started with critical patching needs. Most of these have been taken care of, but there are a few that still need to be worked out. EA has always been known for releasing products based on dates and fail when it comes to release of a polished product. It is not uncommon for any company to require patching, but to the extent that EA pushes this fact is now simply a running joke among customers.

    That said, this is where the content makes up for quite a bit. I'll forego the Battlefield for adults and Call of Duty for kids argument, but Battlefield has been the definitive military styled shooter for quite a while and I don't see them losing that title.    … Expand
  91. ACESsiggy
    Mar 14, 2014
    7
    Would love to give this game a 10 but due to the sheer amount cpu usage and hardware needed to run the game I'm giving it a 7. My rig isn't the best but it surely isn't the worst either, and while I tried to enjoy the campaign and multiplayer, it's just too much on the cpu running at 90 percent.

    Single player was well done and I enjoyed the story and action. Great game just way to    Would love to give this game a 10 but due to the sheer amount cpu usage and hardware needed to run the game I'm giving it a 7. My rig isn't the best but it surely isn't the worst either, and while I tried to enjoy the campaign and multiplayer, it's just too much on the cpu running at 90 percent.

    Single player was well done and I enjoyed the story and action.

    Great game just way to heavy on the average pc. Geforce gtx 560 averaged about 30fps on low settings.    … Expand
  92. Hun7ing
    Mar 2, 2014
    6
    At its core battlefield is all about epic battles on a big scale with cool toys and gadgets to somewhat simulate real warfare. This game does that but it has terrible net code and some weird game mechanic choices. I am a fan of Battlefield but after six months this game still has lots of issues and I would only recommend it at a discounted price.
  93. re1tar
    Feb 24, 2014
    6
    I waited a new bf and hoped she would be like bf:bad company 2, Yes she got completely as bf:bad company 2 , system requirements and video don't match ,the graphics are by and large as in the above play,FACEPALM multiplayer almost not changed , the company itself brad Hollywood scriptwriter,in General, better bf3 , the overall score of 6 out of 10 (1.5 from 2.5 per the schedule of 0.5 2.5I waited a new bf and hoped she would be like bf:bad company 2, Yes she got completely as bf:bad company 2 , system requirements and video don't match ,the graphics are by and large as in the above play,FACEPALM multiplayer almost not changed , the company itself brad Hollywood scriptwriter,in General, better bf3 , the overall score of 6 out of 10 (1.5 from 2.5 per the schedule of 0.5 2.5 for the company of 2.5 2.5 multiplayer , 1.5 from 2.5 atmosphere )… Expand
  94. wownd10405
    Feb 17, 2014
    7
    Great quality, best geuraepikneun I can admit that. But the story was too much. Compared to previous work, but still like the heart has not changed too unfortunate.
  95. tgundel
    Feb 17, 2014
    6
    Great game, but too f***ing scarred by bugs and crashes. Atm I can't play two matches in a row without it freezing and entering a sound loop. It's f***ing terrible!
    They upped the game-play from BF3, but most of the maps are not very good for all game modes, and Rush for example has taken a huge hit to groin from BF3.
    I love it when I can play it without any issues, but the bugs and    Great game, but too f***ing scarred by bugs and crashes. Atm I can't play two matches in a row without it freezing and entering a sound loop. It's f***ing terrible!
    They upped the game-play from BF3, but most of the maps are not very good for all game modes, and Rush for example has taken a huge hit to groin from BF3.
    I love it when I can play it without any issues, but the bugs and crashes, which are never fixed, because EA, leaves this game nowhere near a perfect score and can only land it at 6 in my opinion!    … Expand
  96. Circadia
    Feb 14, 2014
    7
    Despite some issues regarding stability, Battlefield 4 is a lot of fun. It improves on many of the gameplay elements of Battlefield 3. It's not a radical departure from 3 rather is more of the same but refined. While gameplay is improved in 4, I will argue that the level designs in 4 are inferior to 3. I had said on several occasions to friends that the best would've been a fusion of 4Despite some issues regarding stability, Battlefield 4 is a lot of fun. It improves on many of the gameplay elements of Battlefield 3. It's not a radical departure from 3 rather is more of the same but refined. While gameplay is improved in 4, I will argue that the level designs in 4 are inferior to 3. I had said on several occasions to friends that the best would've been a fusion of 4 gameplay with 3 maps. I have noted since then that one of the expansions is an import of favorite maps from 3 into 4. I wonder if this decision was inspired by similar feedback concerning level design for 4. Overall, lots of online fun to be had, and those really epic moments of a massive blast you survived, the perfect kill, or a well oiled squad keep you coming back for more.… Expand
  97. terbas
    Feb 13, 2014
    5
    Although this could have been the best Battlefield game ever, this chance was wasted and the legacy of "the best game ever" (in my opinion) was squandered just to compete with the "other" game. This game was unfinished right from the start (even the beta was an alpha indeed) and was rushed to be released before COD. Yes, it introduces many new -and nice- features but turns into pureAlthough this could have been the best Battlefield game ever, this chance was wasted and the legacy of "the best game ever" (in my opinion) was squandered just to compete with the "other" game. This game was unfinished right from the start (even the beta was an alpha indeed) and was rushed to be released before COD. Yes, it introduces many new -and nice- features but turns into pure abomination in the end due to the constant freezing, disconnections and the countless bugs. On my ps3 system (don't begin to say the gameplay was intended for next-gen since there's something called "optimization" and if the PS3 system wasn't enough to deal with the game then it shouldn't be released for that console in the first place), it freezes on my "every" play and enough is enough. I regret that I even purchased Premium right from the start. The patches, on the other hand, didn't help at all. It's sad to see the Battlefield series at its current state. I hope BF5 will be tested properly and have more constant MP (as well as SP). My 5 out of 10 is dedicated to the fun I had with the game in spite of many frustrating moments. But I have to admit, this is the worst BF product ever.… Expand
  98. IamWaffen
    Feb 9, 2014
    5
    Ignoring all the game breaking bugs Battlefield 4 fails to innovate in comparison to Battlefield 3. The innovations that Dice attempted to add such as new weapons, levelution, and new game modes lacked in comparison to what made Battlefield 3 an enjoyable game.

    Other than that, Battlefield 4 would've been a better $35-$40 expansion pack to big brother Battlefield 3.
  99. Lacav
    Jan 22, 2014
    5
    And the buggy gameplay of the battlefield series sadly continues.. Along with that EA refuses to give the player the freedom to choose language, if not bought from EA's only certified partner Origin...... bad, bad, Eletronics arts..
  100. Schmidy
    Jan 19, 2014
    7
    The only problem that I have with BF4 is that I cannot play the singleplayer campaign due to the game crashing, while I do have that problem with multiplayer it happens after several hours of gameplay. I really enjoy playing in multiplayer which makes up for the lack of singleplayer.
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

44
#44 Best PC Game of 2013
7
#7 Most Discussed PC Game of 2013
27
#27 Most Shared PC Game of 2013

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
81

Generally favorable reviews - based on 52 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 42 out of 52
  2. Mixed: 10 out of 52
  3. Negative: 0 out of 52
  1. Pelit (Finland)
    Mar 11, 2014
    91
    Battlefield 4 could just as well be called Battlefield 3.5. The new Battlefield features are only marginal improvements over Battlefield 3, but even as such it leaves the competitors way behind. Hopefully the bugs will be squashed soon. [Nov 2013]
  2. GameCritics
    Jan 13, 2014
    60
    Even if multiplayer wasn't buggy, Battlefield 4 would still only be a barely passable installment in all respects besides the snazzy graphics. EA and DICE played it safe by providing the same thing they did the last time around, with another phoned-in campaign and only minor alterations to the online.
    Read full review
  3. Level7.nu
    Jan 3, 2014
    60
    Battlefield 4 keeps soldiering on in the same footsteps as previous games in the series. The lack of worthwhile news makes you wish for more. Dice stays in its comfort zone calls for explosions and not much more. The series needs to evolve or fade out.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »