- Publisher: Electronic Arts
- Release Date: Jun 26, 2012
- Also On: PlayStation 3, Xbox 360
User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 132 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 81 out of 132
-
Mixed: 24 out of 132
-
Negative: 27 out of 132
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Nov 13, 2012
-
Jun 29, 2012
-
Jun 29, 2012even tho its kinda lame to even sell 4 maps for 10ish euros i think maps overally arent that bad and weapons are good...but still if i want some hardcore close quarter i play deathmatch on canals or kha. island .. but overally the whole pay for each new rock we add system is kinda lame.. why dont they add monthly subscription if they are that lame ;D
-
Jun 17, 2012
-
Sep 4, 2012Any way I look at it, I can't help but notice how EA/Dice cheaped out on this one. I mean TDM on the other maps is just as good or better if you do need 64 player close quarters carnage. It looks like they would have only put half as much effort into these small maps than the big ones. so they should only cost half as much. Unless you like Call of Duty. Yes I had to mention it :?
-
Sep 20, 2014It's a decent expansion pack, the maps are good and the game modes are decent (they could have been more and better though). If you want the exact opposite experience of a Battlefield game then you should try it.
-
Pelit (Finland)Oct 13, 2012Battlefield goes Call of Duty and does it actually pretty well! [Aug 2012]
-
PC GamerAug 8, 2012It's worth buying if you're sick of getting shot by premium players' overpowered new weapons on regular servers and want to equip the new arsenal yourself, but Battlefield 3's hectic fighting fails at CoD's smaller scale. [Oct 2012, p.71]
-
CD-ActionJul 6, 2012If you love with Battlefield's team deathmatch mode, you must get this DLC. [August 2012, p.76]