- Publisher: Beamdog
- Release Date: Mar 31, 2016
User Score
Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 577 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 194 out of 577
-
Mixed: 30 out of 577
-
Negative: 353 out of 577
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Oct 20, 2022
-
Aug 6, 2022
-
Feb 12, 2022
-
Nov 27, 2021Much as good as the original. I liked the story. The graphichs more upgraded but it doesnt hit from the old one. I will just start baldur's gate 2.
-
Oct 7, 2021
-
Aug 6, 2021Ignore the haters. The game is incredible. I have loved the series for over 20 years, this game is VERY true to them
-
Jul 3, 2021Weak story compared to original BG. Poor writing and characters. Quick buck by using an established franchise name?
-
May 19, 2020Although this game has poor writing, I must say it has the spirit of Baldur's Gate and tries its best at being an interlude between the two classics. When I treat it as a big modification to Baldur's Gate it is just fine, but when I think how much it costed on launch, it just makes me sad.
-
Apr 28, 2020
-
Apr 8, 2020
-
Feb 27, 2020
-
Dec 3, 2019Lazy, minimal effort, mediocre writing & obvious cash Gram..
Beamdog is on blast because they have ALOT of remasters of our legacy coming soon..
The quality better be better then this.... -
Nov 7, 2019
-
Aug 22, 2019
-
Dec 13, 2018I really like this game but then again im quite familiar with Baldurs Gate so its great for me. Playing it on my iPhone, really small UI is the issue but otherwise great.
-
Jun 9, 2018Game was a alright, pretty much the same hack n slash but with an awful writing and bugs here and there.
But with Amber Scott trying to push down her agenda and pretty much taking a big dump on 99.9% of BG fans it would be an abomination not to give this a 0/10. -
Mar 3, 2018
-
Jan 2, 2018
-
Nov 13, 2017
-
Oct 2, 2017I enjoyed my time with this game, but it certainly has it flaws. The sterotypical stoner type with the magic mirror was a bitt over the top, as well as some voice acting not being of a very high standard.
You don't relly get that "Baldurs Gate-feeling" the two originals had, but nonetheless, it is not a waste of time if you liked them. -
Oct 1, 2017This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Sep 9, 2017
-
Aug 6, 2017To all who bought the "ehhanced" editions of BG and BG2: you are directly responsible for this abomination seeing the light of day! I hope you're happy now that Beamdog monkeys have smeared their **** all over the timeless classic. Don't say you didn't know. Don't say we didn't warn you.
This. Is. All. Your. Fault. -
Feb 1, 2017Remaking an all time PC classic into linear, poorly written and completely unnecessary LGBT indoctrination? Yeah, there's only one score one can give this drivel...
-
Jan 23, 2017
-
Jan 16, 2017
-
Dec 15, 2016I actually enjoyed this game, I felt it fit rather nicely between BG1 & BG2. Could it have been better, yes but overall it was ok, it does need some more bug fixing though.
What I do not appreciate are the insults and disrespect from certain individuals working at Beamdog. Banning and disrespecting fans (or disrespecting the original game) is not a good business model. -
Dec 11, 2016Game was ok, experienced a few bugs with the game crashing to desktop and certain events not triggering. The ending was a severe let down
The silencing and insulting of fans by the community manager and some others at Beamdog was lame to say the least. I doubt I will buy another product from the company if they continue with this sort of thing. -
Dec 6, 2016Played the original game back in 1998. I recall it got excellent reviews and quite a few awards, including game of the year. Unfortunately, Dragonspear bears little resemblance to its predecessor.
Also, the game developers, Beamdog treated quite a lot of fans in a disrespectful way.
Thankfully I got a full refund. -
Dec 6, 2016Writing was rather poor in terms of the overall story, characters and dialogue options.
Voice acting was not needed in many places, text would have sufficed.
Quite a few bugs
The new NPCs are not great and old NPCs were modified
The attitude of Beamdog towards fans was most disappointing
Awards & Rankings
-
CD-ActionJun 29, 2016Living up to such legacy seemed impossible but Beamdog understands Baldur’s Gate and created a game true to the original. Unfortunately along with the party you need to gather a band of patches, because bugs are crawling all over the place. [06/2016, p.40]
-
May 18, 2016Decent expansion to the classic RPG, which -in addition to the inevitable technical limitations- suffers mainly due to the uneven quality of the script. All in all, it is a very good excuse to once again venture into the world of Faerûn.
-
Pelit (Finland)May 9, 2016Beamdog’s expansion embraces both the past and the present. The adventure is inconsistent, ragged and the script could be a lot better, but at its best Siege of Dragonspear captures the essence of Baldur’s Gate - even if fleetingly. [May 2016]