Apocalyptica (2004)

 PC
  • Publisher: Konami
  • Release Date: Apr 9, 2004
Metascore
34

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 5 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 5
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 5
  3. Negative: 4 out of 5
Buy Now
Buy on
  1. Computer and Video Games
    50
    Despite boasting a wholesome choice of 16 lead characters as well as spells, melee weapons and guns, in reality the combat element of the game is weak.
  2. Cheat Code Central
    40
    Apocalyptica may not accurately portray the end of the world but it does nothing to preserve the future of gaming as we know it. Let us hope this is not a sign.
    All this publication's reviews
  3. GameSpot
    31
    Terrible from top to bottom, suffering from bland, derivative gameplay, simplistic level design, brain-dead AI, and a buggy graphics engine that chugs even at low resolution.
  5. PC Gamer
    30
    Combat is largely devoid of any tactics, and the only interesting aspect of the fighting is a two-fisted system that lets you swing a sword with one hand and fire a gun with the other. [July 2004, p.68]
    All this publication's reviews
  6. Eurogamer
    30
    Apocalyptica's lazy design and sheer lack of imagination is more than enough to ruin any chance it had of developing the relatively interesting premise. Forgive Konami, father, for they have sinned.

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
2.8

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 13 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 13
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 13
  3. Negative: 9 out of 13
  1. Motichoor420
    Jun 9, 2023
    8
    If you like simple arcade style shooting and sword slashing (not a combo fest like Prince of Persia or Legacy of Kain) then this is a rare andIf you like simple arcade style shooting and sword slashing (not a combo fest like Prince of Persia or Legacy of Kain) then this is a rare and under rated gem. Just because of its simplistic gameplay, apparently poor storyline (come on guys, its goods versus evil here, saints versus demons, what more could you want?!?!?!) and, as some one once put it way back in 2003, a 'chuggy game engine' (works better on dual or quad core you know!). There are 4 classes of characters to choose from, each class has 4 warriors, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. But the overall game play is the same, albeit the missions have varying objectives (rescue colleagues, stop the chambers from flooding, save the fortress, etc). Now minor issues aside (no multiplayer connections/players, team mates getting stuck in places, enemies sound hilariously the same) the game has a very rocking sound track (i have the songs in my personal playlist you know!) the graphics are really sweet for a 2003/2004 game, and though being simplistic, the gameplay reminds you of games from yesterday.… Full Review »
  2. KajetanG.
    Dec 1, 2005
    3
    - The good part: We have very nice music, we have a nice graphics engine, some nice levels, a buddy who fights at your side, some tactical - The good part: We have very nice music, we have a nice graphics engine, some nice levels, a buddy who fights at your side, some tactical oders to give and an interesting scenario. - The bad part: The gameplay , the mission design, the AI. The game itself! It's .. well ... not finished? Or poorly designed from the beginning? The combat is a mess, no tactics, just sluggish clicking and hoping to hit someone. Sword combinations? Well, they may be implented, but not connected with the mouse input. Horrible! And the mission design is ... well ... ehrm ... read the Eurogamer Review. I gave up at this point, because there are WAY BETTER games to spend my time with. Stay away from this game, please!… Full Review »
  3. BrianL.
    Dec 23, 2004
    10
    Unique, exciting PC game! Built upon the skill of Konami, fast paced futuristic combat set in a World that resembles UT2004 but with Unique, exciting PC game! Built upon the skill of Konami, fast paced futuristic combat set in a World that resembles UT2004 but with character! Cut screens add to the polished aspect of the game. The few individuals that gave it a poor score probably never reached any of the levels where the game really shines! Konami always believed you have to earn it to see it! -Brian… Full Review »
See all user reviews »