Anno 2205

 PC
  • Publisher: Ubisoft
  • Release Date: Nov 2, 2015
User Score
6.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 332 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 147 out of 332
  2. Mixed: 83 out of 332
  3. Negative: 102 out of 332
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Traslogan
    Nov 3, 2015
    3
    By any other name this would be a nice city-sim game, but as an Anno game this has simply just went on a 10-mile hike out of its comfort zone in the worst possible direction. We've lost our random-maps, story-mode is mandatory, no sandbox, the AI is now completely non-existent as an actual opponent (100% story and menu based), the few features that have been kept from the previous gamesBy any other name this would be a nice city-sim game, but as an Anno game this has simply just went on a 10-mile hike out of its comfort zone in the worst possible direction. We've lost our random-maps, story-mode is mandatory, no sandbox, the AI is now completely non-existent as an actual opponent (100% story and menu based), the few features that have been kept from the previous games haven't even been explained by the extremely lacking tutorial / story.

    I don't even know how a developer could see this as the next logical step in the series, even if it was serving as a reboot (which it isn't, judging by release times and the fact that it's simply continuing the naming conventions of the previous games).

    For anyone who wanted more of the same, you're better off scouring for mods for the previous games (Anno 2070 has one or two big mods out there if you can find them).

    Aside from its severe issues actually being an Anno game, it brings its own serious host of issues:

    The in-game economy is extremely volatile. Without extensive pre-planning you are simply screwed over every time because the game fully expects you to max-optimize all of your buildings before they are really usable.

    The AI that pops up as dialogue (Not like it pops up anywhere else now) is extremely spammy and even if you try to cancel its pop-ups, it barely gives you a minute before the spam continues.

    In general bugs, there isn't too many and that area seems okay, other than the time I got my ship to sail through islands because obviously the pathfinding simply did not care.

    The loading times are pretty bad too for the new multi-map mechanic. I'm running Anno 2205 on SSD with an i7 skylake and a 980Ti in my rig, but I still wait 20-25s for a map to load, and many times it ends up with a story cinematic over it and the game simply will not run smoothly and I end up with a jittery cinematic as if I'm trying to run this on a 20-year-old PC

    To note, the lead-developer of this Anno installment is the same one working on the previous 3 titles. The same person who knew the success formula to Anno has managed to completely override it into this strange product that no longer relates to its predecessors. It's as if Call of Duty decided its next installment would be better with RPG stats and isometric 3D.

    This is no longer Anno. If you want Anno, you're out of luck.    … Expand
  2. JackPaladin
    Nov 3, 2015
    4
    Great graphics. Above average sound and music. Greatly simplified game mechanics. And they have removed multiplayer; conflicts and battles with other AIs; Trade routes; diplomacy; random maps; and all buildings can now magically be moved to any other location without cost or penalty. It's a tablet version of the game for the casual crowd.
  3. Randomehro
    Nov 5, 2015
    3
    Unfortunatelly, Anno 2205 is a big disappointment. I was expecting a game similar to Anno 1404 or rather 2070 with expanded features. The game was changed radically. Here are main problems with this game:

    - The mechanics of this game has been massively simplified, and is a real offense to the IQ of every Anno series fan. The game is boring, there are no enemies on the map, no threat, no    Unfortunatelly, Anno 2205 is a big disappointment. I was expecting a game similar to Anno 1404 or rather 2070 with expanded features. The game was changed radically. Here are main problems with this game:

    - The mechanics of this game has been massively simplified, and is a real offense to the IQ of every Anno series fan. The game is boring, there are no enemies on the map, no threat, no need to transfer resources between islands, unlimited resources, less freedom to construct harbors, no need to carefully plan the structure of your city, no need for careful balancing of the resources.

    - No mutliplayer! I loved to play Anno 1404 Venice and Anno 2070 with my friends on custom randomly generated maps.

    - No sandbox mode.

    - No factions! Really?! WTF! The whole complexity and depth of the game was destroyed.

    - Overpriced. This game should cost $15 for what it offers.

    + The only good side is improved graphics.    … Expand
  4. MoonStorm
    Nov 13, 2015
    4
    I'm trying hard to find another game in this genre that is similarly bad in terms of simulation in this day and age. Most of the time you'll find yourself watching the needs bar, applying the formula supply >= demand. A few more twists when it comes to the coverage of a few buildings, but I'm not talking about industry here. With the exception of the arctic region, you can place theI'm trying hard to find another game in this genre that is similarly bad in terms of simulation in this day and age. Most of the time you'll find yourself watching the needs bar, applying the formula supply >= demand. A few more twists when it comes to the coverage of a few buildings, but I'm not talking about industry here. With the exception of the arctic region, you can place the industry wherever you want. Stick a building on the other side of the map and in an instant, your citizens will be happy and the demand will be met. There are no fluctuations, no time in transit for the goods to reach their destinations, no traffic worries, nothing about how the workers will reach their factories, no shops for the population to purchase the goods.

    The stupid side missions and the passable but completely unwanted mini combat games which take place in a separate isolated environment, together with the nice graphics, have all helped me progress in the game. But the problem still remains. This game is not pulling me in, and the cities seem lifeless from high up there where I'm watching the income and the needs bar. Playing in multiple regions having slightly different rules is a nice refreshing twist, but Ubisoft Blue Byte has unfortunately missed the ball with the dumbed down simulation.    … Expand
  5. zeleniy
    Nov 15, 2015
    2
    Bad optimization. Not interesting quests. The new combat system filed a miserable arcade. Too easy economically. For 3-4 days the game comes a time when there is nothing to do in the game. Sad funeral of ANNO series
  6. DeyvsonCaliman
    Jul 25, 2016
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This game has a new approach to this franchise, the market is simplified, we don't control trade routes by sea anymore. It had some advantages, since it had become boring, to some extent, to deal with all those details and micromanagement issues. In this game we build 3 kinds of cities, normal ones, ice ones and space colonies. Each one produces what the other need, so we have to develop them and trade what they make with what others make.

    If in other games of the seires we suffer with micromanagement issues as our empire grows. In this one it is too oversimplified, everything seems too previously calculated. But It was good to some extent, as we could expend more time building and expanding. I had a really good time playing the game, but it got a little boring before it should. Even so it doesn't change the fact that it is a very good game.    … Expand
  7. marqpas
    Jan 23, 2016
    2
    First: every other Anno is better. And while pretending to also be a lunar citybuilder, it shows (from earth) the moon moving in the sky from right to left !!! Incredible. Even games like Railroad Tycoon 3 and Simcity 5 got this right. Then the atrocious gameplay: You are the CEO of MegaCorp, so (yeah sure) take crate A from B to C and crate D from B to C. Do this twice and help Doctor EFGFirst: every other Anno is better. And while pretending to also be a lunar citybuilder, it shows (from earth) the moon moving in the sky from right to left !!! Incredible. Even games like Railroad Tycoon 3 and Simcity 5 got this right. Then the atrocious gameplay: You are the CEO of MegaCorp, so (yeah sure) take crate A from B to C and crate D from B to C. Do this twice and help Doctor EFG to get crates H/K. Then click once to build a prebuild building, and haul more crates from all over the map to other places on the map. Now talk to the CFO from UltraCorp and haul crate L to place M. The CFO also lost crates at N,O and P. Please haul these crates behind your truck ( it's 2205, so you have to click and click and click again to hook the crates to your vehicle) Now talk to the board of directors, who seem to have lost some crates..... ah.... reinstalling Anno 1404 will hopefully make me forget this... not a game, but what... tour of mindnumbing duty. The music is substandard (all movie music you ever heard in a blender and respawned), but the graphics are nice!… Expand
  8. bobant92
    Nov 18, 2015
    6
    i was very hyped for this game, but it turned out to be far less than i expected.

    it looks great, and still takes some micromanagement skills, but comparing it to 2070, it feels like a downgrade. no shipbuilding, trade routes feel simplified, and after setting up the basics, there is really nothing to do, but build even more production and build even more dwellings, and then do the    i was very hyped for this game, but it turned out to be far less than i expected.

    it looks great, and still takes some micromanagement skills, but comparing it to 2070, it feels like a downgrade. no shipbuilding, trade routes feel simplified, and after setting up the basics, there is really nothing to do, but build even more production and build even more dwellings, and then do the same on the moon. that pretty much kills all replayability.

    not the most economy management game i played, but i expected more from this franchise.    … Expand
  9. Oloorin
    Dec 8, 2015
    5
    This is what a missed opportunity looks like. The chance to expand the series and improve upon the core features has been thrown by the wayside. There are positives to this game, I won't deny that. The biomes are pretty cool, and the graphics are pretty. Compared to previous instalments in the series however, I can't recommend purchasing this game for those who have enjoy those. WhereasThis is what a missed opportunity looks like. The chance to expand the series and improve upon the core features has been thrown by the wayside. There are positives to this game, I won't deny that. The biomes are pretty cool, and the graphics are pretty. Compared to previous instalments in the series however, I can't recommend purchasing this game for those who have enjoy those. Whereas before, there was actually some process to becoming more familiar with the amount of resource buildings needed for your population, that is gone. Instead, you've got an easy to use menu that displays how much of a resource you are gaining or losing, and takes out all the guesswork. It is simply stupidly easy, and there isn't any re- playability value. You are going to absolutely love this game if you're one of those people that didn't like the previous games because they were 'too hard'.
    The combat, while pretty and full of explosions, is arcadey in nature, and has pretty much absolutely no bearing on your success. Whereas in ANNO 2070, you would be required to build up a fleet and engage in battles to protect your trade routes and smite your enemies, your only motivation now is for rare resources that you can't seem to get rid of fast enough. Quests keep on being spammed at you constantly, making you mildly tempted to tear out your hair at times. No multiplayer or scenario mode, basically make this a one-time play through game, which is infinitely poorer than previous instalments, so you may as well start with those. To reiterate, this game doesn't really belong in the same series as the rest, and should only be picked up by the casual crowd who like stupidly boring games after a long day at work.    … Expand
  10. Robinjhoe
    Feb 14, 2016
    5
    I like Anno 1701. I love Anno 2070 with its depth and its Scifi setting. So I was already on the Hypetrain when they seriously shocked me with the trailer from Anno 2205 at E3. I really looked forward to this game. I imagined it to have the same economy system like 2070 but with the Moon and even further in the future.

    What did I get? A dumbed down casualized Anno game. Dont get me    I like Anno 1701. I love Anno 2070 with its depth and its Scifi setting. So I was already on the Hypetrain when they seriously shocked me with the trailer from Anno 2205 at E3. I really looked forward to this game. I imagined it to have the same economy system like 2070 but with the Moon and even further in the future.

    What did I get? A dumbed down casualized Anno game. Dont get me wrong the visuals are awesome and the first time you get to the moon is just awesome. But.... thats all? There is no endless mode.... in an Anno game... they removed everything unique about the Anno games and dumbed it down! Factories teleport their stuff everywhere. No logistics! There is actually only the story over and over again. You could ognore it. But sometimes you have to do it or else you can not advance.

    As always disappointed to the core.    … Expand
  11. towerofpower256
    Jul 23, 2017
    10
    Very good game.

    The Good: - Faster pace than other Anno games, less waiting around (except quests) - Easier layouts, as most production buildings stack as either a box or a column - Multiple maps at once, keeps regions and resources interesting - No trading between islands in the same region - Most resources just use supply/demand, not "how much do I have in storage" (balance the    Very good game.

    The Good:
    - Faster pace than other Anno games, less waiting around (except quests)
    - Easier layouts, as most production buildings stack as either a box or a column
    - Multiple maps at once, keeps regions and resources interesting
    - No trading between islands in the same region
    - Most resources just use supply/demand, not "how much do I have in storage" (balance the demand and you're good)
    - Incentives to enter combat

    The Bad:
    - No multiplayer
    - Story is pretty lacklustre
    - AI contacts can be like spammy pop-ups, reminding you to do things
    - Quests can "drag on" as you wait for you command ship to go from one place to another, often just feels monotonous and time-wasting    … Expand
  12. guilhermefdias
    Feb 19, 2016
    0
    Disappointing. I have been an Anno fan for a while, and while this is a serviceable city builder, it is NOT an Anno game. No logistics, no defending your home turf, the characters have no character, no production difficulties, and no open custom maps. It opts for the "balancing jobs with workers" dynamic, that pretty much every other city builder is already doing better. In short, thisDisappointing. I have been an Anno fan for a while, and while this is a serviceable city builder, it is NOT an Anno game. No logistics, no defending your home turf, the characters have no character, no production difficulties, and no open custom maps. It opts for the "balancing jobs with workers" dynamic, that pretty much every other city builder is already doing better. In short, this game does to Anno, what C&C4 did to the Command and Conquer series.

    If you are not an Anno fan, but like shiny, easy, city builders, buy it when it hits a good sale.

    If you are an Anno fan, avoid 2250, cry, save your money and go fire up a custom map on 2070    … Expand
  13. barkogy
    Nov 6, 2015
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I was waiting for this game, but what I have is far from what was expected. Most of the original Anno features are changed or removed. These features made Anno games unique and preferred. Removing or simplifying the original functions just killed the game.

    Anno 2205 is more like a spin-off from the original Anno games. I do not consider it part of the sequel. Now it is just one of the many city builder games with nice graphics.

    Money makers at Ubisoft, it does not work like this. In Anno 2205 I was expected "Anno 2070 with moon race". Ships not only on the sea but spaceships, space trade vessels, space harbors, laser defences in the spaceports, unique gadgets to find on the moon, space laboratory, space station....a lot of inventions...

    Sure it will be discounted in a couple of weeks....    … Expand
  14. tehace
    Nov 5, 2015
    8
    Fisrt of Im not a diehard fan of previous Anno titles therefore Im not noticing lack of features. I've read the negative opinions most of them are from players that were expecting the same. Im not saying the changes are good nor bad but for me it played pretty decently.

    I enjoyed building my corporation, buying competitors and expanding to their lands, Im not the fan of the RTS element    Fisrt of Im not a diehard fan of previous Anno titles therefore Im not noticing lack of features. I've read the negative opinions most of them are from players that were expecting the same. Im not saying the changes are good nor bad but for me it played pretty decently.

    I enjoyed building my corporation, buying competitors and expanding to their lands, Im not the fan of the RTS element of it, but I played it 3 times to get some starting resources and than never touched it again, so far I never lacked the materials they provide. Several hours in the game starts to be a bit more complex, oh well not complex the game is rather easy going. I started knowing nothing, I ran into debt after quite a while as I've build a **** of unnecessary architecture, once I did I got a bailout with interest and rather easily figured out whats what, the game doesnt punish you at all as I quickly moved things around and disable production in all production facilitates that were producing excessive goods. From than on the game mostly orbited around chilly city building. I really enjoyed that aspect of building 'good looking' city instated of min-maxing everything with ugly looking most optimal builds. The arctic is kind of exception from that rule but I liked that those regions have a different feeling to them, like logistic seems to be a **** in arctic region mostly due to you being limited in usable space and having to cover long distances between your mines, the moon is rather expensive on the other hand, you have more freedom but it cost quite a bit, once you upgrade the starport so it can transmit energy it also opens up additional ways of managing your resources.

    My opinion is a bit biased because Im playing this game in 3d and it looks really well (apart from some issues with rendering that I can live with), mines are super good looking as is the skyline of the mix with more advanced buildings or massive crop fields / facilities you eventually have to build. The ability to relocate freely really gives you freedom to build 4fun. People that are looking for a challenge might be disapointed. I almost completely disregarded the campaign if there is any, I'm not sure I havent noticed :) for me it feels like a sandbox, very chilly, you dont seem to be pressured by anything, so you should keep that in mind if you're looking for something else.

    Lastly I havent noticed any performance issues, I mean the game is not running in 120fps all ultra (im using an old 680/i7-3930k combo) but I can set the settings relatively high and still enjoy city building in 40+ fps its not the kind of a game that requires twitch reflex. The loading times are barely noticeable, the first 10-15% seems to be getting a bit than it just swirls and is gtg I usually check / adjust trade routes in that time so I dont notice it that much at all. I suppose if you dont enjoy the game at all you will boil inside for all the extra time you need to keep up with the game ;p maybe you should just stop playing than? There is really no point in torturing yourself thinking you will change the game to be somethign else with the power of your imagination.

    Im not sure about replay value but I expect it to be minimal, wihtout 'factions' per say and it seems like you can buy-out all the regions from your competitors during one playtime so there would really be very little incentive to start over than just to have a different start place and maybe expand differently like maybe go fast on corporate levels and money to buy out one of the earth competitors before going to the arctic I have no idea but there might be one reason to play it again, not sure if there is more. I wouldnt buy it at full price, it was like half the price on greenmangaming and its not that bad of an offer.    … Expand
  15. Gcritics
    Nov 4, 2015
    6
    En los últimos tiempos han aparecido varios juegos de gestión de ciudades, sin duda la sorpresa fue Cities Skyline. En el caso de Anno, se presenta una perspectiva diferente que en si no llena a los jugadores mas críticos. El juego es parcialmente bueno, sin embargo aveces resulta un tanto aburrido, dando la impresión que todo es sumamente monótono y no existe una verdadera libertad paraEn los últimos tiempos han aparecido varios juegos de gestión de ciudades, sin duda la sorpresa fue Cities Skyline. En el caso de Anno, se presenta una perspectiva diferente que en si no llena a los jugadores mas críticos. El juego es parcialmente bueno, sin embargo aveces resulta un tanto aburrido, dando la impresión que todo es sumamente monótono y no existe una verdadera libertad para el jugador, eso si ni hablar de las batallas navales considerando que no es lo mejor del juego . El veredicto final sobre este juego es que es divertido a ratos pero no es para jugarlo ni mucho menos la revelación del año.… Expand
  16. kant10
    Nov 9, 2015
    2
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. What a disappointment!

    Anno 2205 a highly anticipated yet. A logical continuation of the excellent Anno 2070 would have been welcome. Lot is lost in Gameplay, too, no doubt. The concept was planed at all levels, management, strategy, diplomacy. Once apprehended game mechanics we finish the tutorial scenario partly fifteen hours ... then politely asked to determine a goal to reach 1 million. And this is the end. No different scenario. No sandbox. No new map. If you replay the game you retype the same scenario, and especially the same map. No more random map.

    Fini also the management of warehouses, since the system is automated. Fini management or trade routes had to build its own merchant vessel fleet, there also is automated and shortened to a simple exchange of goods on the world market or in its own territories.

    Fini also trees productions, there you have a groin 50 goods to produce in all (3 territories) against the triple see double in previous games including Anno 2070 where we had with each of the three factions full production trees .

    Fini tax management which sometimes saved us from bankruptcy. Again this is automated.

    And diplomacy then? ... Nonexistent.
    Bon bah trade then? We'll see in a few days or weeks the limits of the global market system ...

    So visually beautiful, it has more the feeling of the hands a beautiful empty shell. We already feel coming 3 to 4 or 5 dlc 15/25 euros each, that will make the full game Anno 2205 it should have been at launch. In made if you want to get in Anno 2205, know that it will cost you 100 euros in a groin and several months of waiting for a full game.

    It also feels that Ubisoft is on the wrong track, already the last 2 assassin's creed was not a success (me being taken in by marketing AC unity I have not bought the last AC syndicate), whereas now he sabotages us the Anno series with the help of blue byte ...

    Anno 2205, a game made for trailer pretty but empty of its essence ....    … Expand
  17. AAnimanga
    Nov 8, 2015
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I can really feel the ambition on this game but the sacrifices that has been done may well be its downfall.
    To be honest i didn't play much before come here and search for reviews curious what the others has to say. And sadly i will agree to them.
    Breathtaking scenarios, outstanding graphics and the experience to travel to moon are for sure the positives of the game. But there is no Anno in them.

    -No Hard-trading decisions. That system along with the use of the warehouses is almost obliterated from the old series.
    - No danger in each section with no battles.
    -No Drastic environment, environmental changes or checking the climate feature that was in Anno 2070. Sad that this wasn't included in the game.
    -Ships really feel that there is no use of them.
    -Fun enjoyable quests missing from the game.
    -Strategic resources are no more strategic. You can farm anything, anywhere, in any island. You lose the need to search for taking an island just for its resources.
    -Mission maps are like a mini game which reminded something from the 90's. I found it poorly made and repeating.

    To be honest as much as I anticipated for the game feels like i didn't get a reward. I am sure that the expansion that follows (always does) can be a great improvement to a game, that has a potential, but not the proper quality for the Anno series. How much we must wait and see...

    If not for the graphics and the moon experience the score would be even lower...    … Expand
  18. BlackMagix
    Nov 5, 2015
    8
    As someone who was introduced into anno at 2070, I'm really enjoying this game. It brings the aspects of what I loved about 2070 (city building, resource management, and map development) and greatly expanded upon it.

    I love that once I finish with one map, it retains it's resources and I can come back to it to help influence my other colonies in other parts of the world. The military    As someone who was introduced into anno at 2070, I'm really enjoying this game. It brings the aspects of what I loved about 2070 (city building, resource management, and map development) and greatly expanded upon it.

    I love that once I finish with one map, it retains it's resources and I can come back to it to help influence my other colonies in other parts of the world.

    The military portion of the game feels tacked on however and more of a chore than an enjoyment. If it weren't for the military portion, I'd rate this game higher.    … Expand
  19. MariaMaria
    Nov 6, 2015
    10
    For those who make some ridiculous and absurd claims in order to only downrate the game, inform yourself next time, before make any preorders or unwanted purchases.

    Some facts: It was announced a year ago that Anno 2205 won't have a multiplayer mode, that skirmishes won't have any weight and be limited to certain campaign chapter. The global market will have an massive overall, with    For those who make some ridiculous and absurd claims in order to only downrate the game, inform yourself next time, before make any preorders or unwanted purchases.

    Some facts:

    It was announced a year ago that Anno 2205 won't have a multiplayer mode, that skirmishes won't have any weight and be limited to certain campaign chapter. The global market will have an massive overall, with simplified and intuitive management. That the sandbox mode will be rather a continuous mode with certain goals and working population; that demands raw materials, interaction, and better environment etc.

    So haters, **** off.    … Expand
  20. knarkworst
    Nov 4, 2015
    1
    Many changes... But unfortunatly not in a good way.

    Really Anno.... The future again? And this is what you came up with? Really dissapointing.... This game is a mistake, and not worth a Anno title, it destroyed what made Anno great. Tips for next game: Go back in history (1910) would be great. Bring back the military aspect with fleets and bring back AI players. DONT DUMB down    Many changes... But unfortunatly not in a good way.

    Really Anno.... The future again? And this is what you came up with? Really dissapointing....
    This game is a mistake, and not worth a Anno title, it destroyed what made Anno great.

    Tips for next game:

    Go back in history (1910) would be great.
    Bring back the military aspect with fleets and bring back AI players.
    DONT DUMB down the resource aspect anymore.

    Anno 2205 is in my opinion a huge mistake.    … Expand
  21. SirSponge
    Nov 4, 2015
    8
    Having currently clocked just over 10 hours on Anno 2205 I am not even close to the end of my first corporation however I have experienced most of the elements which are on offer and would currently give the game an 8 out of 10. I have previously played Anno 2070 I would have to agree with the overall consensus that Blue Byte has tried to adapt the series to cater to more casual players,Having currently clocked just over 10 hours on Anno 2205 I am not even close to the end of my first corporation however I have experienced most of the elements which are on offer and would currently give the game an 8 out of 10. I have previously played Anno 2070 I would have to agree with the overall consensus that Blue Byte has tried to adapt the series to cater to more casual players, removing areas such as diminishing resources and taking out the coop aspects entirely.

    That being said what is on offer is still grounded in traditional Anno concepts, you still have to manage trade between multiple regions to advance your population, with each new population level demanding a vast array of products to grow. The new Arctic and Lunar settings bring to light areas which city sims are yet to really explore and do so in a way which makes each development site feel unique and burdened with their own problems for you to solve. For me personally trying to grow your moon colony whilst supporting it from Earth with resources and also balancing your economy is when the game is at its best.

    The visuals and sound are great, with the graphics really having a colorful flare to them which ever increases the games futuristic feel. Each building is beautifully designed and animated with Anno 2205 also adopting the module building expansions from Sim City, allowing you to personalize your industry buildings and further expand them without having to build an entirely new one.

    The game does fall of the rails a bit when it comes to combat, with the ship battles being comparable to that of a mobile game. Basically you will be granted access to these external missions whereby you control a small fleet and attempt to destroy a rival corporations infrastructure and resources. With the combat revolving around using special abilities and spam attacks. I've never really understood why combat was needed in Anno games, when the focus is predominantly on city management and trade and for me this mode felt a bit rushed and ultimately pointless.

    Overall I do feel that this game is a step forward, Anno 2205 still retains the core features that made the original games great (if somewhat simplified) and also brings new elements to the table with the additional regions to settle. I do understand where some people are coming from by expressing their annoyance with its simplification but I do believe that if you enjoyed previous Anno games or city sims in general you should at least consider looking into Anno 2205 as it is at least trying to innovate in areas, even if that means taking a few steps backwards in others.    … Expand
  22. alefou
    Nov 6, 2015
    3
    All that made an "Anno" game has diseapered. This is like a smartphone game developped on PC. No strategy, no diplomacy, no gestion, this is a shame. I have the same feeling when i played the reboot of simcity.
  23. Sjalka
    Nov 6, 2015
    8
    This game is both - very awesome - and also very disappointing.

    One tends to be quite conservative when it comes to long time franchises. There is a certain and very specific expectation of "what the game should be like" - which acts counterproductive to progress. With that said ... the new Anno is in many aspects - a very new game. The look and feel of the UI and how you approach it    This game is both - very awesome - and also very disappointing.

    One tends to be quite conservative when it comes to long time franchises. There is a certain and very specific expectation of "what the game should be like" - which acts counterproductive to progress.

    With that said ... the new Anno is in many aspects - a very new game. The look and feel of the UI and how you approach it is the same or at least very similar - but it kind of lacks some core mechanics. But lets start with the positives... :

    The game looks very good and runs very well even on medium computers. Design and style fits very nicely into its near futuristic outlook. It is not over the top "Star Trek"- like in terms of city design and technology (aside from flying cars) ... there is still a good balance of beauty and industrial design that kind of comes in an "Apple"- look ... sort of. (meaning, everything is a bit too sterile, too white, too smooth - but design-wise in a positive way)

    The terrain looks amazing (at a great cost - which i ll get to in the negative things) - and the feeling of tranquility - which i value highly for Anno games is present. Yes - it is real time ... and yes - there are opponents (or meant to be... ) you are still given a lot of time - and the game mechanics do have patience and forgive all but the gravest mistakes. (a little too much forgiving for many people i daresay)

    But wait - there are negative sides, too ... :

    Firstly - my beloved "Endless mode" kind of misses. I have to admit - i do not care for the Anno story ONE BIT - i consider them about as tedious as a tutorial to a game that is not too complicated to understand. With the absence of the endless mode comes (or at least i guess that is a consequence) no random maps. As pointed out in the positives - the terrain looks great ... but not random - rather re-designed. And while the more recent Anno titles used predefined islands rather than tile based seeds anyway - here the entire world is kind of "set". So ... yea - it is a bit like Sim City on a fixed area map.

    Then there is the lack of any urgency. I did point out that the tranquility is a very nice aspect of Anno - but it never felt like a total absence of enemies. While Anno enemies may not have tried to conquer and invade the players sand castles - there had always been a kind of competition over the resources of the various islands ... a kind of "he who comes first..." - along with a grudge of the ones that were only second.

    One reason i can see for that is that the game is not really "existential" anymore. By that i mean ... in the "past" Anno titles - it was all about imperialism, independence and autonomy - even at the cost of living at the edge of starvation. In the last "future" Anno, it was about survival against nature on a mostly hostile planet (i think we can consider water to be hostile to humans for the most part). The latest Anno however never made me feel like there was any real threat at all.

    Other than that ... comparing the game to city builders like "City Skylines" or even "Sim City" ... i kind of feel a little disappointed by the geometry of building. I realize that it allows the game to probably run much better on lower end computers - but i still wish it would allow me to build my settlements other than in 90 degrees square designs. While it made sense on the tile based Anno titles - the new maps simply are so much more organic - yet the cities we build do not match it. This is but a small nitpick though.

    All in all - it is a solid 8/10 from me - a worthy successor that is daring enough to depart from the old anno roots. While i may not agree with all the changes - i fully agree with change by principle. Buuuuut .... personally - i kind of (still) prefer to play Anno 2070 - if i want to play an Anno game that is.    … Expand
  24. MaxHestings
    Nov 8, 2015
    10
    Great game!

    The sandbox mode is now at the end of the campaign and you can do multiple sessions and combine them together. I have played all the Anno games over the last 20 years and this is another great Anno game. Don't get thrown off by within few hours, the game has a huge endless mode that starts after the story stuff is done. Improved controls, improved graphics and some    Great game!

    The sandbox mode is now at the end of the campaign and you can do multiple sessions and combine them together. I have played all the Anno games over the last 20 years and this is another great Anno game.

    Don't get thrown off by within few hours, the game has a huge endless mode that starts after the story stuff is done. Improved controls, improved graphics and some awesome new features make up for no coop and a lack of map generator.    … Expand
  25. jiang
    Nov 12, 2015
    0
    boring game. not anno anymore.
    no pros

    cons only
    -no MP
    -resource management is no longer needed
    -stockpiling of resources and controlling the market is no longer do able because of the new feature of how resource production works.

    Basically not ANNO any more
  26. Kojot93
    Nov 4, 2015
    0
    I don't know hat happened to this game. I am great anno fan I have played every anno game of anno series and i'm totally disappointed. That game is totally not an anno game. Don't know why it gets so good reviews (well some aren't that good). The thing is its more like some puzzle game that should be available on mobile. There are no ai opponents like in previous anno games, militaryI don't know hat happened to this game. I am great anno fan I have played every anno game of anno series and i'm totally disappointed. That game is totally not an anno game. Don't know why it gets so good reviews (well some aren't that good). The thing is its more like some puzzle game that should be available on mobile. There are no ai opponents like in previous anno games, military aspect is almost non-existent, and economy management is nothing in comparison to previous anno titles.

    The main core of anno series was great balance between city builder and rts, and that is what made this series so awesome and uniqe. In previous titles you could not just grow your city but you had to take care of possible threats. What we have now is some simplified puzzle game with maybe great graphics but who cares if you have nothing to do after like 15 hours of gameplay. I hope they will fix this game in expansion because it really is not worth your money. You can buy it at -75% discount but not for full price.

    Actually don't buy it even on discount unless they will fix gameplay in some expansion and i still hope they will.    … Expand
  27. terminatahx
    Nov 7, 2015
    2
    Extremely disappointed in the game. Basically the depth of the game is removed and there is no sandbox mode. Instead you get a 3 tiered pseudo campaign. In game options are a shell of what Anno 2070 provides. Gameplay seems disjointed and nonsensical. Theres no sense of challenge or accomplishment. Graphics are the only positive. This is essentially Ubisoft trying to capatilize onExtremely disappointed in the game. Basically the depth of the game is removed and there is no sandbox mode. Instead you get a 3 tiered pseudo campaign. In game options are a shell of what Anno 2070 provides. Gameplay seems disjointed and nonsensical. Theres no sense of challenge or accomplishment. Graphics are the only positive. This is essentially Ubisoft trying to capatilize on the "trust" that previous Anno Titles have earned. Not work buying.… Expand
  28. hrsr0
    Nov 8, 2015
    2
    Anno 2205 , all they (ubisoft or bluebyte we the customers will never know who the hell destroyed the franchise with anno 2205 being and utter disgrace) had to do is do a sequel to anno 2070, they failed :

    Random map generator removed THrill of getting to the first big island and colonizing it before ai removed Battles vs as opponents for islands/resources on same map removed Eco    Anno 2205 , all they (ubisoft or bluebyte we the customers will never know who the hell destroyed the franchise with anno 2205 being and utter disgrace) had to do is do a sequel to anno 2070, they failed :

    Random map generator removed
    THrill of getting to the first big island and colonizing it before ai removed
    Battles vs as opponents for islands/resources on same map removed
    Eco score removed
    Warehousing , and other quintessential anno* franchise features removed
    Building defenses vs pirates/ai to defend your island removed
    Continous game removed ( even though campaign can be played ad infinitum its pointles its the same map over and over. )

    Essentially ubi$cam destroyed anno franchise it removed EVERYTHING THAT MADE an ANNO* game an anno game, what a goddamn disaster and shame incredible one of the oldest franchises on pc dies at the hands of ubi$cam, it had a good run though anno 2070 was stellar, not an perfect game but still an 200% anno game not like this anno 2205 wich is -125% anno its an pos city builder wich isnt that good anyway if i WANTED TO BUY A DAMNEd city builder i would of purchased cities skylines not anno

    Graphics are outstanding
    Attention to detail amazing best in series other than that its dead what a shame.    … Expand
  29. Rick_Terminal
    Nov 6, 2015
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Spoiler alert:
    This game is POINTLESS, and you WILL BE BORED AFTER 6 HOURS. (*Assuming you have played 1404 and 2070 to death already). Hope I didn't ruin the surprise.

    1/10 seems a harsh score, but considering the £60 fee I paid for this, it feels justified. I have played this for 2 days and I have no wish to return until the DLC is released. Why would I bother, there is nothing left to see?

    I'm probably just reiterating what others have said, but here is the pro and con list:

    Pro: Um... I've not thought of a pro yet. It looks OK in UHD, I suppose?
    Con: £60??! (with season pass) Come off it Ubisoft
    Con: It is soul-less and monochrome in nature. Even Germans want to funk up Wagner sometimes!
    Con: Dull. So very dull. It's like watching files copy from one directory to another.
    Con: A better tutorial is needed for newer players. Flashing icons to show what to click, perhaps?
    Con: No replay value. Islands are set in stone, and there is no multiplayer.
    Con: No random maps (see above)
    Con: Feeble rewards for finishing missions. A light show? Really? 4 hours work for a poxy light show?
    Con: Missions are unrewarding, dull, and are designed to waste as much of your time as possible.
    Con: You cannot actually win or lose, because you cannot lose your islands
    Con: The "enemy" is actually totally impotent, as is the player. As I said you can't win or lose.
    Con: No invade or being invaded - the "competition" only serves to offer you missions (see "dull" above).
    Con: You cannot see what the competition is doing - you either outrank them or you don't.....
    Con: ....But so what anyway? You can't win or lose, remember? (Oh, have I said that before?)
    Con: No apparent "end game"... Things just stop happening. That's pretty anti-climatic.
    Con: One dimensional characters - couldn't care less about any of them, and they don't matter at all.
    Con: Only 8 ships??! What the...? No upgrades apart from "rank"?!
    Con: This game sucks of being forced in to publication early after a huge cut in features. Blame the d***head in charge who project managed the game or forced a premature release.

    It breaks my heart to see the series come up with this. No doubt it will sell a load because of the fan base, so Ubisoft will assume it's a trick worth repeating, but this is a terrible game.

    In summary: AVOID! Try buying 1404+Venice or 2070 instead (if you have not already).    … Expand
  30. RogalDorn01
    Nov 9, 2015
    9
    I can certainly see why people are divided about this game. If the thing that excited you about the previous Anno games was multiplayer or ship combat or a story plot than this definitely isn't going to go well for you. if you, like me, played the previous games strictly single player and relished the balancing act of growing your cities and balancing the trade network between them thenI can certainly see why people are divided about this game. If the thing that excited you about the previous Anno games was multiplayer or ship combat or a story plot than this definitely isn't going to go well for you. if you, like me, played the previous games strictly single player and relished the balancing act of growing your cities and balancing the trade network between them then you are IN LUCK! It would seem that Blue Byte put 99% of their development budget into making this game for you. This is a seriously fun city builder and it is immensely satisfying to keep everything going smoothly. Disclaimer: I have only played the game on the hardest difficulty settings, so keeping your budget balanced is actually tough and there are no bailouts. I flirted with bankruptcy a few times getting my Arctic region up and running, but by the time I started my moon colony I was totally unprepared for how expensive it would be.

    Overall, I rate it a 9. But I think this one is going to be Love / Hate for fans of the series with very little middle ground.    … Expand
  31. lightyears
    Nov 5, 2015
    9
    Potential masterpiece with some flaws. As somebody who works in urban planning and housing. And fantasies about future living this game has great potential. Anno 2070 looked no realistic view about future world. But this game does. It looks of a pretty realistic view about the world 200 years from now. The graphics are also great. Even on Medium. What annoys me are some minor flaws. ByPotential masterpiece with some flaws. As somebody who works in urban planning and housing. And fantasies about future living this game has great potential. Anno 2070 looked no realistic view about future world. But this game does. It looks of a pretty realistic view about the world 200 years from now. The graphics are also great. Even on Medium. What annoys me are some minor flaws. By example no save option. Even if Unisoft manages to make a masterpiece it somehow always finds a way to screw things up. Hopefully they will add a manual save option by an update soon.… Expand
  32. Kulzar
    Nov 3, 2015
    8
    I've found Anno 2205 to be extremely enjoyable. I've sunk about 5 hours in it today and I loved every minute of it.

    Compared to Anno 2070, I feel that the gameplay experience is a lot smoother. It's always extremely clear what kind of material you need. The buildings' area of operation are much less restrictive. While a house can be out of range, now the community buildings are    I've found Anno 2205 to be extremely enjoyable. I've sunk about 5 hours in it today and I loved every minute of it.

    Compared to Anno 2070, I feel that the gameplay experience is a lot smoother. It's always extremely clear what kind of material you need. The buildings' area of operation are much less restrictive. While a house can be out of range, now the community buildings are considered a resource in themselves. This enables the player to be more creative with his cities without being punished too harshly because of building placement. In my humble opinion, this is a huge positive change.

    To the people that say that trading has been removed from the game... Are you for real? It's still there, but now you don't spend hours managing the most inconsequential trade routes with boats. Now you just have to keep an eye on how resources flows between your colonies and make sure your production can handle the demand.

    Talking about the colonies... Having three biomes with completely different play-styles is really fun. Switching between each one adds variety to the game. And they are pretty.

    The campaign integration is, in my opinion, very well done so far. Maybe it won't work for everyone, but I think it's a good way of making the world feel real. Honestly, I could hardly bother doing the Anno 2070 campaign because I found it tedious. Here, it feels like a suggestion. "Hey, by the way, I know you're busy but could you help us not dying pretty please kthx? Or just keep doing your thing, whatever." While the Lunar terrorists are a bit unbelievable, at least they are menacing villains with a really cool leader.
    It's too early for me to give a verdict or talk about the re-playability. However, based on my experience so far, I am very pleased with my purchase.

    TLDR; I really liked Anno 2070, but I feel that Anno 2205 is a better game so far. I give it a solid 8 if you like the genre.    … Expand
  33. 10avoid
    Nov 3, 2015
    10
    To begin with, this game really is not like the last part of this magnificent series of strategy games. At this moment should be upset, because the gameplay variety and replayability lost. But I will not, and here's why. Gorgeous setting, an incredibly beautiful picture, great style, good sound. It is like a new camera mode - beautiful landscape filming. Thanks to developers! The result -To begin with, this game really is not like the last part of this magnificent series of strategy games. At this moment should be upset, because the gameplay variety and replayability lost. But I will not, and here's why. Gorgeous setting, an incredibly beautiful picture, great style, good sound. It is like a new camera mode - beautiful landscape filming. Thanks to developers! The result - the fans will be disappointed, mass user rejoice! 10 10.… Expand
  34. Bialy
    Nov 5, 2015
    0
    Only title links it with previous Anno games. Playing it feels like playing an app on your tablet. They deleted like 70% of content than it was before...
  35. mindw0rk
    Nov 4, 2015
    10
    So far every new Anno was better then previous. And Ubisoft managed to keep this tradition with 2205. I fully approve alot of new changes, especially taking combat part into separate maps. Enemies destroying buildings in 2070 was really annoying at times. They made 2025 more relaxed, but more fun either. Its really refreshing to manage several distant colonies on different continents andSo far every new Anno was better then previous. And Ubisoft managed to keep this tradition with 2205. I fully approve alot of new changes, especially taking combat part into separate maps. Enemies destroying buildings in 2070 was really annoying at times. They made 2025 more relaxed, but more fun either. Its really refreshing to manage several distant colonies on different continents and even planets. And graphics is as always - fantastic. Since its same old Anno, game probably wont win GOTY, but for fans of economy management games its a real gem of the year.… Expand
  36. slajmyuu
    Nov 5, 2015
    3
    Dont think for a second that this is the same as previous titles in the series. This is a split from the ANNO core that i personally love. no multiplayer? magic cropbuildings? horrible performance? no, this is a new game entirely and if you are looking for a new ANNO game you should look elsewhere
  37. elbro_dark
    Nov 4, 2015
    0
    Das spiel hat nichts mit der Anno Reihe oder generell damit zu tun, es hat keinen Multiplayer.
    Man spielt also Nur Kampange, dabei MUSS man Missionen abschließen da man dadurch sonst nicht weiter kommt.
    Man hat relativ mehrere Inseln wie Antarktis etc. freigeschalten, jedoch muss man bei welchseln der "inseln" jedesmal die komplette Insel neu downloaden!?!. Erforschen muss man nichtsmehr    Das spiel hat nichts mit der Anno Reihe oder generell damit zu tun, es hat keinen Multiplayer.
    Man spielt also Nur Kampange, dabei MUSS man Missionen abschließen da man dadurch sonst nicht weiter kommt.
    Man hat relativ mehrere Inseln wie Antarktis etc. freigeschalten, jedoch muss man bei welchseln der "inseln" jedesmal die komplette Insel neu downloaden!?!. Erforschen muss man nichtsmehr (inselseitig).
    Im grunde genommen handelt das spiel davon das man möglichst viele Arbeiter auf einen geringen Bauplatz unterbringt, und dabei darauf achtet das einem das Geld nicht ausgeht.

    Grafikmßig ist das spiel für die heutige zeit in Ordnung.    … Expand
  38. GalaxyConvoy
    Nov 10, 2015
    0
    So disapointed... too features removed... No sand box... One scenario... So simplified... NO SHIPS...
    Really Not a good Anno. 2070 stills the best....
  39. Irodome
    Nov 8, 2015
    10
    235 hours as of writing this review, that is how many hours I have logged into this game. I am a newcomer to this series and I say that I regret not hearing about it before. Anno 2205 is indeed a mix of city building games like Sim City and Cities XL, and also RTS games like Age of Empires and Empire Earth. What the developers tried to do was create a world in which you can smoothly mix235 hours as of writing this review, that is how many hours I have logged into this game. I am a newcomer to this series and I say that I regret not hearing about it before. Anno 2205 is indeed a mix of city building games like Sim City and Cities XL, and also RTS games like Age of Empires and Empire Earth. What the developers tried to do was create a world in which you can smoothly mix the two without going overboard on one or the other. They succeeded and created a whole new genre. Rather similar to the old ways of Europa Universalis, this game thrives based on the ways in which society was based. i.e. free trade markets. You must colonize an island of your choosing and begin manufacturing goods. Each island has its own unique resources.

    The game purposely makes it hard to gain gratuitous amounts of income, unless you know how trading works. When you start producing goods, if you are clever you will produce more than your island requires. By putting these items up for sale, other factions will begin to visit your island and buy these items off you for a decent penny. You could also set up your own trade routes with your own ships and force the process faster. The point I want to make is that if you want to get the most out of the game you need to open a free market for your island, and trade. This is the way the human race as achieved its standing position in the world: trade. So you say, "Kiwi, trading is fine and all but tell us more about the spotlights and downfalls of the game!". I've been pretty generous with the compliments of this game, so lets talk about its biggest downfall. The campaign...is fun but terrible to go through. The campaign is separated into some main missions with sub missions inside each one. Each mission carries over into the next until you go to a new main mission. This is where it gets to be a problem. When I started the game I managed to get through the first two campaign missions just fine. When I got to the final main mission, I got 3 submissions into it and realized my economy was almost irreparable. There was nothing I could do to save it because my income was negative, and I had 0 money. Sure my plants were producing goods, but not enough to sustain my population. The fact is that I slacked on thinking ahead in the first two missions. So I went back through and replayed them, now my economy is top notch and I am set to do the final mission.

    On the topic of buildings. Some people say that it's the same buildings over and over, not true. There are multiple looks for each house, and you can rotate the other buildings so you get a different look each time. No city in Anno will be 100% the same unless they tried to do it. The graphics are near flawless and it runs great. I have a normal Dell and it works fantastic. Watching all the production facilities work can be fun for hours. No production facility is the same. The water effects follow superposition of waves, which means you can do interference problems. (I have a degree in physics ^^). I found myself playing with boats in order to recreate Youngs double slit experiment. (It worked more or less if you are wondering). Speaking of time, this game is long. I recently got my first monument finished and I am working on a second. It took 15 hours in a game for me to get a monument up. This can be done much faster! In fact I could probably do it in 3 or 4 hours now. (at least putting the foundation down). The point is, if you do everything right, a monument will be a great and easy addition to your city. But...we don't do everything right so you will end up destroyed quite a bit of houses to get your monument in the right place. (unless you are clever and checked wiki). Difficulty...this game is hard, but it does get easier. Area use is a big property of this game. If you are clever you will use the smallest amount of area for maximum efficiency. I give this game a 10 out of 10 for great gameplay.    … Expand
  40. DrStrange
    Nov 3, 2015
    10
    Game should have a score of 8.5 to 9, but people giving it a 0 well u know.

    Graphics-10 Gameplay-8.5 Music-9 Complexity-8 Fun Factor-9 Game has all the fixings from prior games, except for multiplayer and random generated maps instead of having ships go port to port on the same map you now have a global logistic train that supplies the moon and back.. If you're looking for a    Game should have a score of 8.5 to 9, but people giving it a 0 well u know.

    Graphics-10
    Gameplay-8.5
    Music-9
    Complexity-8
    Fun Factor-9

    Game has all the fixings from prior games, except for multiplayer and random generated maps instead of having ships go port to port on the same map you now have a global logistic train that supplies the moon and back.. If you're looking for a great way to kill some hours or days or months look no further    … Expand
  41. karco
    Nov 3, 2015
    8
    Good game for kill time while waiting fallout 4) Nice graphic, nice music, nice missions, great meditative process. Nothing groundbreaking but nice. Best ubisoft game of this year.
  42. DeRangA
    Nov 5, 2015
    9
    This Anno is a real AAA Builder game of unique game design. I like it much more than 2070. I'd only wish Ubisoft would feature Steamworks at some point.
  43. Sturmir
    Nov 4, 2015
    5
    I got into anno a bit later, and ended up grabbing Anno in German when I was deployed there, getting 2070 when it came out and going back to get the other games. Even in 2070 the stench of corporate entanglements in bluebytes was heavy and rancid. However, it was tolerable in the end. Now some of the greatest aspects of the game are completely ruined, washed away by lazy design choices andI got into anno a bit later, and ended up grabbing Anno in German when I was deployed there, getting 2070 when it came out and going back to get the other games. Even in 2070 the stench of corporate entanglements in bluebytes was heavy and rancid. However, it was tolerable in the end. Now some of the greatest aspects of the game are completely ruined, washed away by lazy design choices and lacklustre gameplay.

    1 - It's cheaper to trade with the world market in any case to complete a trade route/supply chain, entirely because of the trade-routes cost to manage, on top of building production, energy cost, logistics, ect. There's no 'easy' way (practical) way to sell excess goods as you make them and manage them either as there is only 3 slots you can have to the world market, so you are constantly either strapped for cash, or rolling in it. It's a waiting game.

    2 - I actually like the sector idea, it was poorly done however. 9 building maps and 2 crisis map limitations is a massive "**** you" to any anno player, especially as the continuity of Anno 2070 was destroyed. What I mean by this: The Ark presented a presistant present throughout the entire games. You could build stuff in 1 map and transport it using the ark to another map, and you had bonuses associated with the ark itself. Any sort of customization in that route is gone, but that's not all. There's no real sort of career progression, and voting is kinda worthless...? Daily quests are non-existent and every quest in this game is a terribad fetch-quest, so what you can do on those 9 building maps is pretty much "fill it up, and your done." which leads me to point 3.

    3 - There's no reason to advance.
    What I mean by this is that the reason why you progressed in a map was so you wouldn't be eliminated in some way. You would progress in every map by building up your cities to unlock ships, weapons, and eventually, the ability to research and develop, unlocking cool things like the Hydro-dam and the Eco-Formers. The two unique sides each had an end-game reason to get them as well. You got to the end of Ecos to get access to sheilds, and the end of Tycoons for nuclear missiles. There was real variety, and a real need to develop yourself. There was many games where I felt the crunch... stocks on islands were being bought by AI, and friends were scrambling in a cold-war-esque military buildup, winning initial battles by the fire of commando-ships, to eventually fielding the bigger boats... then Aircraft.

    4 - Military Aspect. The military-aspect for many was boring, but really... If there doesn't exist a threat to your existence, what the hell are you playing for? This should have been expanded, not shelved and hidden away in "Crisis centers" - about as fun to play as crushing your toes with a hammer would be fun to enjoy. Beyond the mandatory crisis-related battles, there's no way in hell I want to play on those maps. I ignore the quests indefinitely, only so I wouldn't have to do them. That's bad design when I don't feel like playing something because it's simply boring to do.
    On top of that fantastic design choice, was the fact that you only have 8 ships, given to you, that you click to upgrade. It's a shame to, because they were onto something with the fuel and abilities for ships, and I wish that element would have been elaborated and brought into a meaningful game.

    5 - Anno 2205 is afraid to be intelligent, and is afraid that you might be intelligent. Everything is managed for you, to the point where you have nothing to do. However, they have designed the game around wasting time. A lot of what you end up doing is build up a city block. Check to see if your arrows are red. Build more of Red-Arrowed goods. Upgrade (by clicking every god damn building instead of having it be smart enough to do it on it's own, unless I missed that very necessary feature somewhere.) I've mentioned the trading, but without actually managing trade and goods flow, there's nothing to do. There's no research as I've mentioned before (as far as I'm aware.) and it basically boils down to "See, look at how pretty your city can become.. PRETTY ISN'T IT?!" - Anno, you aren't SimCity, you aren't Cities: Skylines. There is no city-management in this game besides plopping stuff down. You don't manage tax rates anymore. You don't manage sewage flow or garbage pickups. This was a strategy game, as much as it was a city builder, and you did a pretty good job of blending those two things in the past. I'm just sad to see that it's no longer the case.    … Expand
  44. ferner778
    Nov 3, 2015
    6
    Disappointed with this game because it could and should have been insanely good. The game is very arcade'y and feels like an app. The economic and military portions of the game are completely separated into different sections hidden behind loading screens. The game is a 180 degree turn away from Anno 2070 and in my opinion should almost be labeled under a different series. The positivesDisappointed with this game because it could and should have been insanely good. The game is very arcade'y and feels like an app. The economic and military portions of the game are completely separated into different sections hidden behind loading screens. The game is a 180 degree turn away from Anno 2070 and in my opinion should almost be labeled under a different series. The positives are there the game is enjoyable to a point. The graphics are amazing and combat is moderately fun ( even with the arcade feeling of picking up power ups.) therefore i give this game a six out of 10 because of the entirely missed opportunity making this game.… Expand
  45. Kalex25
    Nov 6, 2015
    0
    Casual game. Simplistically. No Game Depth. In comparison of other Anno versions. If you want to play Anno in the future, then to choose from Anno 2070.
  46. kozzy420
    Nov 3, 2015
    10
    Endless mode is now at the end of the campaign and you can do multiple sessions and combine them together. I have played all the Anno games over the last 20 years and this is another great Anno game.

    Don't get thrown off by the first few hours, the game has a huge endless mode that starts after the story stuff is done. Improved controls, improved graphics and some awesome new features    Endless mode is now at the end of the campaign and you can do multiple sessions and combine them together. I have played all the Anno games over the last 20 years and this is another great Anno game.

    Don't get thrown off by the first few hours, the game has a huge endless mode that starts after the story stuff is done. Improved controls, improved graphics and some awesome new features make up for no coop and a lack of map generator.

    Overall this is another fantastic Anno game, unlike the Total War series, Anno still hasn't dissapointed me! Also just as a heads up, alot of people hated Anno 2070 to (Go check all the uplay complaints and setting complaints on steam forums or steam reviews). But give this new game some time and you will see it is actually a better endless mode than previous games, it is just not on the main menu and starts after you beat the game.    … Expand
  47. eDrien
    Nov 5, 2015
    2
    This is not an Anno game. I was shocked when i found out that almost all core Anno mechanics are taken out making it feel more like a generic simulation game.
  48. Crackfarmer
    Nov 9, 2015
    4
    A Anno without sandbox? It's like a burger without Meat. Is this some kind of bad joke bluebyte? You can only do 1 boring session, getting constantly spammed with Quests, diplomacy no longer exists and also the trading... This is the worst Anno i've ever played, even the graphics look more worse than in 2070...
  49. ShimakazeMG98
    Nov 6, 2015
    4
    the new graphic looks awesome i guess but it verl lagy and bugy, the story is boring.... no sandbox map no custom game.... the gameplay is too easy and very easy to solved, unlike the previous anno game that make me rethink all of my building strategy. i very disappointed with this one... shame...
  50. Besiu
    Nov 8, 2015
    0
    I've come here to see if others are as disappointed as I am and it seems so. I signed up only to write that this game is totally **** and offers like 80% less than Anno 2070. No random maps, trade routes, no in-game danger so it is almost impossible to lose. So much money for so little and disappointing content. Thanks Ubisoft for giving your fans the game that actually ends after a coupleI've come here to see if others are as disappointed as I am and it seems so. I signed up only to write that this game is totally **** and offers like 80% less than Anno 2070. No random maps, trade routes, no in-game danger so it is almost impossible to lose. So much money for so little and disappointing content. Thanks Ubisoft for giving your fans the game that actually ends after a couple of hours.… Expand
  51. Hamilcarr
    Nov 5, 2015
    4
    I give it 4,for the graphics,and 0 for the rest...maybe this game is intended for 3 years old kid?
    I don't know...the thing is that it is so simple,and the gameplay so boring,that I regret my purchase.
  52. Rellin
    Nov 4, 2015
    3
    Anno 2070 sucked me in right away and I wasted many hours on it. This game has not grabbed me at all and I am forcing myself to keep playing hoping I feel it. That said, I know there are no randomly generated maps and I can only ever play through the game once. I am playing on hard and once I beat it, if I can slog through the next 10 to 15 hours of gameplay, I certainly will not want toAnno 2070 sucked me in right away and I wasted many hours on it. This game has not grabbed me at all and I am forcing myself to keep playing hoping I feel it. That said, I know there are no randomly generated maps and I can only ever play through the game once. I am playing on hard and once I beat it, if I can slog through the next 10 to 15 hours of gameplay, I certainly will not want to do it all over again on the exact same maps only with better or more optimal layouts. No **** way.… Expand
  53. HuggyB3ar
    Nov 3, 2015
    10
    Great Anno game! Great strategic game!
    The graphic is stunning, but if you are a fan of the Anno series you might wonder what happened. A lot of things changed compared to the older titles, but it is a great game. The price this Anno game payed to remove some of it´s game core mechanics of past titles of the series was risky, but in my opinion also somewhat worth it. It changes the game    Great Anno game! Great strategic game!
    The graphic is stunning, but if you are a fan of the Anno series you might wonder what happened. A lot of things changed compared to the older titles, but it is a great game. The price this Anno game payed to remove some of it´s game core mechanics of past titles of the series was risky, but in my opinion also somewhat worth it. It changes the game to a different approach but still is an Anno title. And a next generation Anno title that makes a lot of fun to create a town full of millions and causing issues all day long with one decision you´re doing.

    But:
    It is disappointing that there is no multiplayer at all. Specially playing with friends hours and days, was for me the additional fun.    … Expand
  54. trusbas
    Nov 10, 2015
    10
    The game is a blast. Best in the series. It gets many negative reviews cuz its Ubisoft™. Also, many people reviewing this didnt even play it/spent 10 minutes playing it before writing the review as they contains false information.
  55. eeyk
    Nov 3, 2015
    3
    No continuous mode, Yes there is but only with missions, and A Continuous mode with missions is not fun.
    Overal this game is crap i'm using Steam refund.
  56. Dreepa
    Nov 3, 2015
    10
    Very good Anno game. I played all of them, and this one is different for sure. It gets rid of a lot of mechanics that were cumbersome, and puts its focus on build up part. It is strongly designed for the singe player aspect and has no real multiplayer components, but if you like to play at your own pace multiplayer is nothing that works out pretty well in these kind of games anyway. Thus IVery good Anno game. I played all of them, and this one is different for sure. It gets rid of a lot of mechanics that were cumbersome, and puts its focus on build up part. It is strongly designed for the singe player aspect and has no real multiplayer components, but if you like to play at your own pace multiplayer is nothing that works out pretty well in these kind of games anyway. Thus I am not really missing it.

    In terms of atmosphere and game-feel I really got into the mood of establishing a mega corps, that runs colonies and cities. It is a game where you need to immerse yourself, checking statistics, checking data and numbers, optimizing and re-planning your industry parks to really get most out of it.
    Do not make the mistake and approach it like a Sim City game. It really is something unique in terms of game-play blend. For me the motivation comes from slipping into the role of a CEO that is leading a mega-corp, and feeling empowered to create a mega empire.

    The multi session game-play takes some time to get into, but once you got used to the switch it works fine. I recommend installing the game on a SSD hard disc, to minimize loading times when switching sessions.

    The military part of the game is not really well implemented. If you take it for what it is, a little diversion from the build-up part, it can be fun for while, though it really is always the same with not much depth or options. Then again, this isn't the focus of the game, so you could also just skip them entirely, if you want. They are not mandatory.

    If you look for a relaxing game, where you want to immerse yourself as a grand planner, and tweak the balances of consumption, production, power supply, workforce and logistics, then this game is for you.

    Overall it can be said that the game is excellent in the areas it is meant to be good at. For true build-up gamers this is a 10/10 game. There is enough build space to expand expand expand, build build build and create huge networks with huge cities.

    If you look for RTS combat or adventurer-style story telling with interesting plot twists, then this game is not really for you.    … Expand
  57. Vordulak06
    Nov 6, 2015
    0
    Huge disappoint preordered it the same day as fallout 4 at least one of the two won't suck.

    No micro its literally all super simplified macro.
    No conflict inside your borders
    No mulitplayer
    No random islands
    I could list plenty more but its depressing. I wasted 80$, don't do the same.
  58. jackt246
    Nov 7, 2015
    2
    15 hours later and I'm finished with no reason to replay.

    This anno game is fun while the 15 hours lasts but that's it. The is no multiplayer or randomly generated maps. The upgrades for artic and moon colonies are lackluster with the focus on the original colony you set up. once you finish what is essentially the campaign the is nothing to do but try and get in more investors.    15 hours later and I'm finished with no reason to replay.

    This anno game is fun while the 15 hours lasts but that's it. The is no multiplayer or randomly generated maps.

    The upgrades for artic and moon colonies are lackluster with the focus on the original colony you set up. once you finish what is essentially the campaign the is nothing to do but try and get in more investors.

    £50 for 15 hours in a game of this genre is absolutely pathetic.

    also the combat, my god the combat, around every 10 minutes you will receive a combat mission. The frequency that you receive these is about correct to stop you just waiting around for enough new citizens to come to your city however the are only 3 combat missions. These 3 combat mission will rotate randomly and they are the only ones ever given to you. They are a piece of piss and I suggest you just hold down the numpad plus button from the get go to halve the time it takes.

    Long story short the designers of this game seem to not know what makes the genre enjoyable.

    If you want to play anno go play 2070 or 1404 both of which are much better games. This isn't a fresh take on anno this is a mobile platform worthy game that lacks the content or complexity to deserve it's title.    … Expand
  59. Akiso
    Nov 8, 2015
    0
    I signed up on purpose to write this report, because the game is so bad and I'm so disappointed.
    After playing through the game in10 hours without thinking big about it. You just build the buildings somewhere and press on fast-forward. There is really never a shortage of goods. The older Anno games were much better. If the next Anno is developed in the same direction, I won´t buy it for    I signed up on purpose to write this report, because the game is so bad and I'm so disappointed.
    After playing through the game in10 hours without thinking big about it. You just build the buildings somewhere and press on fast-forward. There is really never a shortage of goods. The older Anno games were much better. If the next Anno is developed in the same direction, I won´t buy it for the first time and although I am a fan since the first game of the series.    … Expand
  60. Black-Blade
    Nov 3, 2015
    10
    Fantastic. The concept is cool and is pulled off really well, it plays and feels like an Anno game but also entirely new at the same time. The graphics are beautiful, very pretty and clean. The game is also a lot more streamlined in comparison to the older titles, many of the unnecessary features have been removed. Its easy to pick up as well you don't have to be a seasoned player to enjoyFantastic. The concept is cool and is pulled off really well, it plays and feels like an Anno game but also entirely new at the same time. The graphics are beautiful, very pretty and clean. The game is also a lot more streamlined in comparison to the older titles, many of the unnecessary features have been removed. Its easy to pick up as well you don't have to be a seasoned player to enjoy it. Most of all the game is fun and relaxing. Definitely recommend it, 10/10.… Expand
  61. Roach1991
    Nov 4, 2015
    7
    So far played for a couple of hours but I kinda like the new mechanics of the game even though I have to explore more my options before I can give it a final review but looking good :)
  62. AIP_73
    Nov 9, 2015
    2
    Это ужас-ужас-ужас!!!
    Какой-то кошмар и дурной сон. Вырезали все, что отличало серию Anno. Оставили плохонький градосимулятор.
    Войны нет, если не захочешь отдельные микросценарии, на отдельных картах в стиле плохонькой РТС, которые никак не влияют на текущую игру. Соперников нет. Есть какие-то другие корпорации, на других картах, которые как-то тоже развиваются, наверное. Во всяком    Это ужас-ужас-ужас!!!
    Какой-то кошмар и дурной сон. Вырезали все, что отличало серию Anno. Оставили плохонький градосимулятор.
    Войны нет, если не захочешь отдельные микросценарии, на отдельных картах в стиле плохонькой РТС, которые никак не влияют на текущую игру.
    Соперников нет. Есть какие-то другие корпорации, на других картах, которые как-то тоже развиваются, наверное. Во всяком случае я не видел их развития и гонки городов не было.
    Торговых маршрутов - с необходимостью иметь флот, защищать его, а то и грабить караваны соперников - нет. Ты просто тыкаешь с одной карты на другую: "передать товар" и все, товар в оговоренном количестве будет бесперебойно поступать.
    Все вырезано, все упрощено - какая-то игра в планшетном стиле, под пивко.

    СЦЕНАРИЕВ НЕТ!!! НИ случайных карт, ни сценариев с особыми условиями какими -то, какие интереснейшие были в 1404. Ничего нет. Есть единственная кампания, которая проходится часов за 20 с нулевой реиграбельностью.

    Не покупайте. Жалею - страшно что взял. Обплевался весь.    … Expand
  63. mastana
    Nov 5, 2015
    5
    Anno became a facebook game like farmville... you wait, you click, 100% boring.
    Military missions sucks as well, everything is too easy, no challenge at all.
  64. BonNAnza2000
    Nov 4, 2015
    10
    Love that Anno gameplay since years. This one is a litlle bit different but still a awsome one in that series. After some hours playing is getting better and better.
  65. marceloscar
    Nov 13, 2015
    10
    Sou um grande fã da série com mais de 513hs de gameplay em Anno 2070. Isso dá alguma credibilidade ao meu pequeno review de Anno 2205. Primeiramente, é bom esclarecer que o novo jogo é diferente do antecessor. Mas com um detalhe, ele continua tão divertido como antes. A cadeia de bens que deve ser montada e na sequencia levada aos benefíciários, ou seja, os habitantes, está mais racional.Sou um grande fã da série com mais de 513hs de gameplay em Anno 2070. Isso dá alguma credibilidade ao meu pequeno review de Anno 2205. Primeiramente, é bom esclarecer que o novo jogo é diferente do antecessor. Mas com um detalhe, ele continua tão divertido como antes. A cadeia de bens que deve ser montada e na sequencia levada aos benefíciários, ou seja, os habitantes, está mais racional. Anteriormente não se tinha uma noção mais precisa da quantidade de bens que deveriam ser transferidos para ilhas, o que muitas vezes fazia com que se produzisse determinado produto em quantidade maior do que a necessária, ocasionando desperdícios de toda ordem, e prejuízo de recursos valiosos.

    Dessa vez o menu (UI) tem um papel fundamental na organização da produção, pois ele passou a ser exibido de forma intuitiva, permitindo ver rapidamente qual item está com a produção negativa, e qual está excessiva. Com isso fica mais fácil incrementar a quantidade de uma determinada comodidade e satisfazer assim todos os habitantes.

    No lugar de criar uma vasta cadeia de transporte de uma ilha para a outra, em Anno 2205 a configuaração dos mapas foi radicalmente alterada. Temos três ambientes distindos para explorar. Começamos num continente com clima temperado, depois passamos para uma região glacial e por último conquistamos uma parte da lua. Cada local possui sua própria infraestrura e economia, de modo que alguns itens do outro continente e do satelite da Terra são enviados de um lado para outro por meio de um ônibus espacial. No lugar dos navios, o transporte de bens é feito 99% das vezes por naves espaciais. Fantastico!

    Acabou-se aquela exigência por vezes irritante de suprir a cidade com bombeiros e hospitais, mas foram mantidos a delegacia de polícia e o centro comunitário, que diferentemente de Anno 2070, agora podem ser colocados em qualquer parte da cidade, abrangendo toda a área pelo número daqueles prédios admnistrativos no mapa, e não exclusivamente pela sua área de alcance somente.

    As batalhas foram transferidas para um cenário espefico, permitindo que o foco do player se concentre apenas na construção da cidade e na produção das comodidades e na distribuição de bens. No decorrer e no final das batalhas - que são navais - se recebe como prêmio itens raros que não podem ser produzidos por fábricas, o que implica num modelo de grinding para certos melhoramentos. Por falar nisso, agora se ganha XP ao fazer as missões, e dependendo do seu nível serão destravados os blueprints e ampliação da capacidade de acumular recursos.

    O jogo não tem um modo "continuos game", mas até agora confesso que não senti falta dele. É na campanha que as coisas acontecem, e ela é imesa!

    Comprei Anno 2205 no dia do lançamento por R$ 129,99 e valeu cada centavo. Recomendo fortemente o jogo para todos que são, assim como eu, fãs dessa série maravilhosa. Num primeiro momento alguns poderão estranhar as mudanças. Mas acredite, elas vieram para melhorar o que já era quase perfeito. A Blue Byte está de parabéns!

    Pros:

    - A engine gráfica tornou o game absolutamente lindo. De longe é o jogo de simulação de cidades mais bonito da historia dos video games;

    - Racionalização da cadeia de produção, pelo aprimoramento dos menus e em função do crescimento não tão acelerado das demandas pelos habitantes, o que tornava a versão anterior um tanto angustiante;

    - A substituição do transporte de bens através de espaçonaves ao invés de navios tornou o jogo muito chique e empolgante;

    - Não é preciso mais se preocupar com o meio ambiente, pois na visão da Blue Byte, a humanidade aprendeu com os erros do passado e, no futuro, a questão ambiental na terra está totalmente controlada;

    - Praticamente todos os bens produzidos no novo game são diferentes da versão prévia, isso é muito legal;

    - Roda muito bem com tudo no high e ultra, em 1080p, em um AMD FX 8350, 8Gb RAM e uma GTX670.

    Contras:

    - Alguns travamentos e restarts aleatorios, mesmo com o PC em 75~85% da capacidade máxima;

    - Em alguns mapas, como no glacial, as exigências dos habitantes são altas. A falta de atenção nesse cenário pode levar você a bancarrota num piscar de olhos, Muito cuidado com seus recursos financeiros;

    - Existe um alerta sobre a possibilidade do jogo causar apilepsia em alguns jogadores que é demorado e não pode ser pulada pela tecla "ESC".    … Expand
  66. Nick_Plexus
    Nov 3, 2015
    0
    Sorry, but this game from Ubisoft was the worst in Syria Annaud. The gameplay is dull, dull, does not pull at all! I love the strategy, but this was the worst of all that I saw. A bunch of bugs, glitches, crashes. My GTX 970 should pull off perfectly, but bad graphics. Notice the strong drawdown FPS. Hopefully with time everything Ispra Just dip the year! Yes, and the price is too high.
  67. Talbort
    Nov 15, 2015
    9
    First of all, this is a great game. Maybe not a great Anno, but still a great game. It breaks with a lot of the old Anno game mechanics, you can like it or not, but the game definitely not deserve it to be rated that badly.
    It looks great, campaign is quite boring (as always in Anno) but the good thing is that the campaign is now integrated into the endless game mode. You don't have to    First of all, this is a great game. Maybe not a great Anno, but still a great game. It breaks with a lot of the old Anno game mechanics, you can like it or not, but the game definitely not deserve it to be rated that badly.
    It looks great, campaign is quite boring (as always in Anno) but the good thing is that the campaign is now integrated into the endless game mode. You don't have to start over after completing a mission, you can build an entire empire in a single game.
    Anno2205 copies some ideas from city builders like Cities Skylines or even SimCity. It introduces new game mechanics like energy, men power and logistics while abandons AI competitors, reduces trading and removing ship battles from the building zones and moves it to specific battle zones.

    All in all, if you liked Anno and don't mind to have some new game mechanics included into the game you will like 2205 as well. If you are completely into the old style Anno you probably may not like this game. But its not a crappy game like all the 0-5 ratings intents.    … Expand
  68. Aleajakto
    Nov 23, 2015
    0
    Играл 10 часов почти на одном дыхании, и вдруг надо взять 90ед робототехники и сдать на корабль, объясню прощу- из ангара надо привезти груз на корабль, в ангаре взял груз,довез,начал здавать до конца не сдал,а квест говорят не сделан,но и груза нет и взять не могу и сдать....Играл 10 часов почти на одном дыхании, и вдруг надо взять 90ед робототехники и сдать на корабль, объясню прощу- из ангара надо привезти груз на корабль, в ангаре взял груз,довез,начал здавать до конца не сдал,а квест говорят не сделан,но и груза нет и взять не могу и сдать....
  69. elbarto88
    Nov 7, 2015
    3
    A nice simulation game but not an Anno title. I can see how you can give this game a positive review if you never played any of the predecessors but if you are looking for a title like the previous Anno games you will be disappointed.

    In many places the games has been over simplified to the point where roads are a pure aesthetic and resources are exchanged between all buildings and    A nice simulation game but not an Anno title. I can see how you can give this game a positive review if you never played any of the predecessors but if you are looking for a title like the previous Anno games you will be disappointed.

    In many places the games has been over simplified to the point where roads are a pure aesthetic and resources are exchanged between all buildings and islands totally automatic. The only trade that has to be set up is between different climate zones and even that just has to be done a few times in the entire paly through and we never get to see a single ship during this.

    Any sense of exploring the world and finding the best spots for your expanding empire is lost when you realize that all islands only differ in size and nothing else. The same mountain can be mined for any resource and the same soil gives any crops.

    The new rare resources mechanic is interesting on the surface but it quickly becomes clear that there is little to no choice to be made here. In the end only a few updates are worthwhile and those are must haves. After that adding a single functioning building just becomes a hassle of clicks until all small parts of it are placed. Without any noticeable freedom of choice.

    In the end this game just made me want to install the predecessor 1404.    … Expand
  70. Jowear
    Oct 5, 2016
    0
    So Ubisoft just a questions WHY you say : "We wan´t to be Indipendent and not that Vivendi is owning us".
    And than you´re just not better than Vivendi you want like Vivendi just Money and that fast, i liked Ubisoft but you started with Assasin´s Creed Unity and continued with Settlers 8 and now with Anno 2205 doing just **** ! Sorry but now i am not longer likeing Ubisoft now i hate    So Ubisoft just a questions WHY you say : "We wan´t to be Indipendent and not that Vivendi is owning us".
    And than you´re just not better than Vivendi you want like Vivendi just Money and that fast, i liked Ubisoft but you started with Assasin´s Creed Unity and continued with Settlers 8 and now with Anno 2205 doing just **** ! Sorry but now i am not longer likeing Ubisoft now i hate Ubisoft .....    … Expand
  71. Jenne
    Jun 22, 2019
    8
    With all the DLCs and addons Anno 2205 is a great building/trading game in its own right. It looks absolutely breathtaking, the biomes are incredibly cool and it plays well too. The problem is how it stacks up to previous Annos. In many ways it feels like a downgrade - there are no scenario maps, no world events like in 2070, no stand-alone sandbox and even no multiplayer. The combat wasWith all the DLCs and addons Anno 2205 is a great building/trading game in its own right. It looks absolutely breathtaking, the biomes are incredibly cool and it plays well too. The problem is how it stacks up to previous Annos. In many ways it feels like a downgrade - there are no scenario maps, no world events like in 2070, no stand-alone sandbox and even no multiplayer. The combat was initially exiled to separate mini-zones and made optional, which was an attempt to accommodate those Anno fans who don't like combat. Obviously all the Anno fans who do like combat complained so Blue Byte added invasions and calamities which are cool the first two or three times but eventually they WILL drive you completely crazy. A big chunk of criticism also comes from Anno fans who don't like futuristic settings but that's not my beef, I love it and it's very well done. EDIT: Writing this review after the release of Anno 1800 I regret to say that Blue Byte learned their lesson only partially. Anno 1800 does include multiplayer and stand-alone sandbox but is sadly missing challenge scenarios and rotating world events, for many Anno fans the best features of 2070.… Expand
  72. RPGcritics
    Oct 8, 2016
    0
    Cheap cashgrab. I never liked the "futue" annos but this is clearly the worst of the series. I would recommend to buy anno 1404 and have a lot of fun and enjoyment with this one!
  73. SRKNZ
    Sep 6, 2018
    4
    Its so hard to find a game these days that's not a disappointment and Anno 2205 is not exception. The key problem for this newcomer was an inadequate tutorial. How do you build a sky bridge? No idea and no help either. Worse still the game feels very linear. There's very little room to do your own thing, just fulfill a series of pre defined tasks. I simply could not warm to this game gaveIts so hard to find a game these days that's not a disappointment and Anno 2205 is not exception. The key problem for this newcomer was an inadequate tutorial. How do you build a sky bridge? No idea and no help either. Worse still the game feels very linear. There's very little room to do your own thing, just fulfill a series of pre defined tasks. I simply could not warm to this game gave up early on. I doubt I'll be back either.… Expand
  74. tomchee
    Mar 24, 2019
    10
    This is the game i have been looking for for long time. Ofc it isn't the same like the Anno 1***, but still cool :)
    Perfect theme(future, technology, colonization of the Moon), design, sounds and music. Yeah it is a bit simple, (especially after Skylines :D).
    For everyone, disappointed: Guys, if it was the same, you would be angry as well. Its not that bad to try something new ;) I    This is the game i have been looking for for long time. Ofc it isn't the same like the Anno 1***, but still cool :)
    Perfect theme(future, technology, colonization of the Moon), design, sounds and music. Yeah it is a bit simple, (especially after Skylines :D).

    For everyone, disappointed: Guys, if it was the same, you would be angry as well. Its not that bad to try something new ;) I think, this on is also loveable,    … Expand
  75. universel
    Jan 7, 2018
    8
    Stellar single player - I think it's the best entry since 1404. It is so beautiful your are invested big time emotionaly caring for this beautiful planet (contrary to 2070). It is a bit easier. They also got rid of All the down time ''waiting'' for something to ''grow''. Music is amazing . No more annoying destruction of your beautiful citadel by nearby NPC.

    It lose a point for one    Stellar single player - I think it's the best entry since 1404. It is so beautiful your are invested big time emotionaly caring for this beautiful planet (contrary to 2070). It is a bit easier. They also got rid of All the down time ''waiting'' for something to ''grow''. Music is amazing . No more annoying destruction of your beautiful citadel by nearby NPC.

    It lose a point for one reason.

    1-no more random maps (that is the reason I still play 1404 and 2070 regularly)    … Expand
  76. bladex
    Jun 10, 2016
    1
    DUMBED DOWN FOR THE CASUAL/IPAD GEN that's all i can say about this POS!

    if you loved 2070 than forget about it this is NOTHING like 2070. 1st of there are NO continuous/random generated maps you get one island and one sector every single time this never changes. You can purchase other islands from rivals but that's it and there is a limited amount to purchase. Next the gameplay    DUMBED DOWN FOR THE CASUAL/IPAD GEN that's all i can say about this POS!

    if you loved 2070 than forget about it this is NOTHING like 2070.

    1st of there are NO continuous/random generated maps you get one island and one sector every single time this never changes. You can purchase other islands from rivals but that's it and there is a limited amount to purchase.

    Next the gameplay might as well be on auto pilot there is literally almost NO challenge to playing this. It feels like a damn mobile game everything has been automated for you all you need to do is build something and make sure the goods are not in the minus than that's all you need to do you don't even need trade routes they don't exist except to other sectors but even that has been dumbed down!

    There are no battles between islands or rivals either all battles are done in a separate map on their own and even they have been dumbed down. The map is littered with fuel and special icons that give you actions to do and they are not sparse even at high difficulty. So you'll find yourself not even attacking half the time just collecting icons than sit back and watch them do all the work for you!

    You will find yourself getting bored with this very very fast it only lasted 1 week for me. If you loved 2070 than stay away from this garbage do not waste your $ on it and boycott all anno games from here on because ub$soft have absolutely destroyed this franchise!!    … Expand
  77. VladiMiagk
    May 16, 2018
    10
    Очень интересная и красивая стратегия. Проходил не один раз. Рекомендую кто еще не играл.
  78. Dcard
    Aug 28, 2018
    1
    Anno 2205 for me was a gamble,
    I had just goten the bad taste that was Anno 2070 DRM out of my mouth...
    Anyway Anno 2205 It looks good... That is the only good thing I have to say about this game, it all goes down hill from there. It is the most watered down game I have every played in a long time. The things that made Anno, Anno is no longer there in a fun or intressting form. The    Anno 2205 for me was a gamble,
    I had just goten the bad taste that was Anno 2070 DRM out of my mouth...
    Anyway Anno 2205 It looks good... That is the only good thing I have to say about this game, it all goes down hill from there. It is the most watered down game I have every played in a long time.
    The things that made Anno, Anno is no longer there in a fun or intressting form. The hyper casualisation of this game is real. I was gobsmacked over this... No port building, no ship building, they made a moon base feel lackluster, there was no factions or ai, the fleet had become a dull chore. That is the best way to describe the game a chore.    … Expand
  79. Kotofon
    Jun 14, 2020
    6
    В Anno 2205™ вы поможете человечеству сделать очередной шаг в светлое будущее. Покорив Землю, вы построите богатые, кипящие жизнью города и огромные промышленные комплексы – но для того, чтобы по-настоящему обеспечить благополучие человечества, необходимо выйти в космос.В Anno 2205™ вы поможете человечеству сделать очередной шаг в светлое будущее. Покорив Землю, вы построите богатые, кипящие жизнью города и огромные промышленные комплексы – но для того, чтобы по-настоящему обеспечить благополучие человечества, необходимо выйти в космос.
  80. Batlh
    Jun 27, 2020
    10
    It's a really good game and with this release we finally could move buildings around without destroying them bcz of wrong placing.
  81. Sunroc
    Jul 10, 2020
    8
    feels not like a real anno but nice to play. the combat "system" is boring.
  82. ShaswatJP
    Nov 23, 2021
    8
    Really the game is very good though...Even today people still love it...but their numbers are low while number of haters of this game are more...Reason:-Annoying DRMs combined with Denuvo and removal of some of the key elements of game...If the above problem of DRM could be solved through removal of this Denuvo related protection then only balance of favor for this game can become stableReally the game is very good though...Even today people still love it...but their numbers are low while number of haters of this game are more...Reason:-Annoying DRMs combined with Denuvo and removal of some of the key elements of game...If the above problem of DRM could be solved through removal of this Denuvo related protection then only balance of favor for this game can become stable because Denuvo completely undermines its performance..So far as I have seen the Doom Series also faced this problem in recent years but they managed to tackle it via removal of Denuvo.Result it became a mass hit yet again with the complete unlock of its potential Anno should do the same..remove its Annoying DRMs if it desires to attain mass appeal back..I don't have any complaint against the Denuvo,DRMs or the game itself they have that right to grow but this removal process should have taken place some years after its mega sales in order to inspect where they could have gone wrong in capturing people's attention towards it..But anyways there is still time for the full potential of this game to unlock in front of its fans if its creators wish to do so through removal of those Denuvo related protection...Hope this action will take place in future somehow.… Expand
  83. ji0ku
    Jan 13, 2022
    0
    I bought the key and activated it in ubisoft. the version was not in the native language. The support service said that the key was not bought on their site and goodbye. I don't think it's fair because I paid and got an irresponsible attitude in return.

Awards & Rankings

44
#44 Most Discussed PC Game of 2015
42
#42 Most Shared PC Game of 2015

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
72

Mixed or average reviews - based on 45 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 25 out of 45
  2. Mixed: 19 out of 45
  3. Negative: 1 out of 45
  1. Pelit (Finland)
    Mar 31, 2016
    81
    Doesn’t reach the stars but will get you to the moon. [March 2016]
  2. PCWorld
    Jan 19, 2016
    80
    Anno 2205 is polished, clever, and Tages-free, but falls prey to the same repetitive, micromanagement-heavy end-game grind that's always plagued the series.
    Read full review
  3. CD-Action
    Jan 12, 2016
    70
    After initial delight and ten hours of fun Anno 2205 became a bit boring. [13/2015, p.40]
See all critic reviews »