A Total War Saga: Thrones of Britannia

 PC
User Score
5.4

Mixed or average reviews- based on 170 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 60 out of 170
  2. Mixed: 48 out of 170
  3. Negative: 62 out of 170

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. juliiouse
    May 3, 2018
    3
    I'm not one to give kneejerk reviews to any products: I feel it's a little insulting given the amount of time a developer puts into a new release. I normally spend a few weeks formulating an opinion on something before finally publishing my opinion, but Thrones of Britannia has left an extremely sour taste in my mouth, not least because I am an avid Total War fan and booked the day offI'm not one to give kneejerk reviews to any products: I feel it's a little insulting given the amount of time a developer puts into a new release. I normally spend a few weeks formulating an opinion on something before finally publishing my opinion, but Thrones of Britannia has left an extremely sour taste in my mouth, not least because I am an avid Total War fan and booked the day off work to play this. So here we are, seven hours later.

    The central issue here is that the Total War series is one of incremental steps: as the games are released, certain aspects of the campaign and battle mechanics get modified, removed, dummied out etc. The problem with Thrones of Britannia is that it removes many previous features without bringing anything new or interesting to the table to replace them.

    This is especially irritating following my gripe with Warhammer I & II's campaigns being a little shallow: the justification in that case is that the races and factions featured in the game are so diverse and different from each other that many of the usual Total War campaign features wouldn't really work for many of them, and to develop specialised campaign mechanics that have the depth of Atilla for each faction would be a massive ask. Thrones of Britannia does not have this justification. The narrow lack of breadth in the game (focusing solely on the British Isles in the latter half of the 9th Century AD) should have allowed for an immense amount of mechanical depth the likes of which Total War has never seen, but there is none of this here. Many features are either directly copied or dummied out versions of what we saw in Atilla.

    The closest the game gets to true innovation is to feature historically accurate settlements and structures on the map, such as churches, farming communities and towns in the state they were back in the period. The issue with this is that it removes much of the variety the previous games afforded in building settlements. A market town will always be a market town and a church settlement will always be a church settlement. The closest comparison to this game is either Medieval I's Viking Invasion or the base game version of Shogun II Total War-- Viking invasion because it focuses on the same area a few centuries before, and Shogun II because it focuses on a race to the throne on a single island: in both cases, these games took advantage of their narrow scope and allowed for a great deal of depth and strategic planning to settlements. In Viking Invasion, you can opt to not even build a settlement at all and leave the region for farming or defence, and in Shogun II you can manage your food to have bustling economic centres at the heart of your clan's territories and strong troop production centres at the edges. Thrones of Britannia offers none of this, which is especially frustrating when a faction you know is going to attack you decides to and you're forced to concede land to them because that's how the settlements are set up.

    Character development and faction management feels worse: the skills tree has been replaced with a far messier looking retinue system and characters feel significantly less personal for it. For a game about roleplaying your own early medieval British dynasty, I felt extremely disconnected with my faction and it's characters: ignore the usual issue of forgetting who your heirs are, most the time I couldn't even remember my faction name without mousing over a settlement. Even in lategame Shogun II, I could remember the name of my finest generals, the towns they'd defended and the members of my increasingly messed up clan, but there is none of this here. It wouldn't be too strong to say that the characters feel like those pointless figures that show up in Rome II's politics tab.

    Battles are pretty much the same as they were in Atilla. Things feel a little faster paced in places but the game does little to capture the precise point in time that the game is aiming to portray. The shield wall is interesting enough, but given that it can't move, it's basically just a version of the one in Atilla but more restrictive. The AI is also extremely suicidal. It's happy to rush the heaviest part of my line with light cavalry and it has no the consideration for the safety of ranged/artillery units.

    Ultimately, the game is functional other than the odd bug, so how can I justify not just aiming for a middle of the road 5? Because the game abjectly fails to achieve any of it's objectives or justify it's existence in the series. It doesn't utilise the era very well, doesn't feel distinct from Atilla and doesn't feel any deeper than the fantasy games.

    Ultimately, this is a very sad outing for Total War and a pretty terrible showcase for their new "Saga" project, which I a shame because I was interested in narrow focus games.

    My only hope to the game in it's current state is that Steam will waive their usual two hours refund clause for me.    … Expand
  2. rustyfeeder
    May 3, 2018
    2
    This is the worst TW game released EVER. Could this be the fall of CA? Or maybe it is time for CA to wake up and start making changes? It is cheap, it is bland, it is just BAD. Trust me, I played every TW game starting from Shogun 1.
  3. Tornan
    May 4, 2018
    0
    I have played more extensive mods of total war games.Instead of releasing mod tools that would allow community to make better ones, they are trying to sell the same game again and again.From what I see CA has lost its touch and turned into a company of ultimate greed.

    Whatever you do don't buy it for the sake of future TWs. Note: Some reviewers said that this was a review bomb and    I have played more extensive mods of total war games.Instead of releasing mod tools that would allow community to make better ones, they are trying to sell the same game again and again.From what I see CA has lost its touch and turned into a company of ultimate greed.

    Whatever you do don't buy it for the sake of future TWs.

    Note: Some reviewers said that this was a review bomb and people voting 0 didn't even play the game and game was not a rip and had very different mechanics.I feel like these comments are coming from PR or Sales departments of CA.First why would anybody try to "review bomb" something unless they see something bad is going on? Secondly I played the game.Last, Mechanics in game doesn't need much work and is just adjustment of some numbers and UI's.What is in this game that a 4 membered mod team wouldn't accomplish with the tools CA has?    … Expand
  4. Madgad
    May 2, 2018
    0
    Nothing special. Tha AI is still poor, diplomacy is useless... Forget about cool mechanic things from WH and be prepared for tons of garbage from Attila.
  5. dlmdarkfire
    May 3, 2018
    10
    As a guy with 386 hours on attila i can easily say that everyone saying "this is an attila rip off" is wrong

    There's so many new mechanics and old mechanics brought back from the old games. The new village system is great, the new recruitment system reminds me of the good old days of medieval 2. The battles are rather similar to attila, but that's also the only similarity between the 2    As a guy with 386 hours on attila i can easily say that everyone saying "this is an attila rip off" is wrong

    There's so many new mechanics and old mechanics brought back from the old games. The new village system is great, the new recruitment system reminds me of the good old days of medieval 2. The battles are rather similar to attila, but that's also the only similarity between the 2 games

    over all, a great new adition to the series    … Expand
  6. cheese-eater
    Mar 1, 2020
    5
    wel lets see here... its the standerd total war format so you can't go to wrong there.
    but its pretty simple campaigns wise and and the battles are practically the same as in total war atila.

    the mechanic: you dont recruid full units is annoying

    so i am giving it a 5 just not my style

    ps i am a veteran total war player i have playet sinds total war rome 1
  7. northernlad
    May 8, 2018
    4
    after hours of trying to like this total war saga game i come to the final conclusion it's a stripped down shallow heartless mess i wrote a proper review on steam worst total war to date and i love the series
  8. Frisbiek
    May 4, 2018
    5
    It's got some pretty neat campaign features, but it's not enough to hide the fact that CA is still milking this game engine for all they can, which really holds the game back. CA showcased the awesome siege battles, and they do indeed seem like fun. And although the game performance is better than Attila- which isn't saying much- it's still really bad during sieges and large engagementsIt's got some pretty neat campaign features, but it's not enough to hide the fact that CA is still milking this game engine for all they can, which really holds the game back. CA showcased the awesome siege battles, and they do indeed seem like fun. And although the game performance is better than Attila- which isn't saying much- it's still really bad during sieges and large engagements overall. It turns in to a slide show. It really takes away from the enjoyment of the game and often find myself autoresolving sieges because I dont want to deal with it.

    CA, you guys have GOT to come up with a better game engine.    … Expand
  9. TsarVadim
    May 9, 2018
    6
    The quick and dirty: AI is horribly stupid, even on Legendary. The campaign map part of the game is more "streamlined" (boring and dumbed down) than ever. Graphics are beautiful and optimized, but the core gameplay is flawed due to the above mentioned issues. If eye candy and the era are all you care about, have at 'er. If you want some depth you expect from a strategy game, look elsewhere.
  10. JMGBORO
    May 28, 2018
    4
    Boring and bland. This game looks great graphically but that is about it. I have played 3 hours and have found my self unable to continue because I am so bored with it. I am reinstalling Empire total war atm, the last total war game that had me properly immersed in the time period.
  11. marcantoineg
    May 13, 2018
    3
    The engine is dated. No optimization improvement over attila. A game that is still not fixed 3 years later. Bland units.
  12. Redrusty66
    May 7, 2018
    4
    As usual, "Critics" are idiots who know nothing about the genre they review...same with movies most of the time. This game is horrible, bare, simplified to appeal to the simpletons of this day and age it seems. CA is still milking this game engine and franchise for all they can, as with most other companies that turn into greedy sharks as opposed to actual game developers who care aboutAs usual, "Critics" are idiots who know nothing about the genre they review...same with movies most of the time. This game is horrible, bare, simplified to appeal to the simpletons of this day and age it seems. CA is still milking this game engine and franchise for all they can, as with most other companies that turn into greedy sharks as opposed to actual game developers who care about their games. As of now, with TWW and TWW2 barely being pretty enjoyable, it looks as though you may as well go back from TWW2 and never buy another of CA/Sega's games. Add to that the fact they included that SCAM called "Denuvo" and you've got a super stick bomb as it deserves.… Expand
  13. Tarakuda
    May 10, 2018
    0
    The worst game in the series, which in fact is an addition to Attila, to simplify everything to impossibility, all factions are the same, removed the destruction of settlements, removed agents, removed the march mode. The worst game in the series. Dumb artificial intelligence is also attached to the aggravated schedule.
  14. Vasot
    May 10, 2018
    4
    You can call it "Attila Total War re-skinned" it's almost the same game with the same gtaphic engine nothing really new also has the worse clunky animations from all Total War games this is probably the most boring game of the series with the most uninteresting factions and with a horrible stupid enemy AI. The game is a scam for me it feels like a bad DLC made for Attila Total War. I amYou can call it "Attila Total War re-skinned" it's almost the same game with the same gtaphic engine nothing really new also has the worse clunky animations from all Total War games this is probably the most boring game of the series with the most uninteresting factions and with a horrible stupid enemy AI. The game is a scam for me it feels like a bad DLC made for Attila Total War. I am going back to play Warhammer 2 TW it's a much better game… Expand
  15. TreborYelam
    May 2, 2018
    0
    it seems like the AI gets worse with ever installment of Total War, somehow.

    It wouldn't be such a big deal if you could play a campaign with other humans... but alas, Total War is once again limited to 2 player. Even with that, Creative Assembly has failed to allow the players to take their turns simultaneously while not at war (like Civilization allows). Either fix the AI or    it seems like the AI gets worse with ever installment of Total War, somehow.

    It wouldn't be such a big deal if you could play a campaign with other humans... but alas, Total War is once again limited to 2 player. Even with that, Creative Assembly has failed to allow the players to take their turns simultaneously while not at war (like Civilization allows).

    Either fix the AI or implement a system that lets me replace it with humans. As it stands the game is a choice between playing the AI with the intelligence of a raising or sitting through a drawn out snooze fest with one other player (and a whole bunch of dumb AI).    … Expand
  16. Quatra
    May 3, 2018
    0
    Wow, who would have thought cutting features, recycling units,maps, and graphics from a 3 year old game and just **** on the AI would make for a bad game... not to mention those ridiculous unit cards; "Historically based" or not. Diplomacy is gone and dumbed down, AI doesnt defend or prepare for it's minor settlements. Also cutting features found in games for the last 5 or so years andWow, who would have thought cutting features, recycling units,maps, and graphics from a 3 year old game and just **** on the AI would make for a bad game... not to mention those ridiculous unit cards; "Historically based" or not. Diplomacy is gone and dumbed down, AI doesnt defend or prepare for it's minor settlements. Also cutting features found in games for the last 5 or so years and calling it a "saga" is just a cop out.… Expand
  17. alex_dragon
    Jun 3, 2018
    0
    It's a complete RIP off of Attila

    They banned ppl and youtubers like Legend of Total War becuase he gave honest opinion and critics about the game. He was now banned out of early access They removed Force march, one of the best mechanics of latest total war, the campaign is dumb down and if you are one of the major factions you can literally win the whole campaign in few turns    It's a complete RIP off of Attila

    They banned ppl and youtubers like Legend of Total War becuase he gave honest opinion and critics about the game. He was now banned out of early access

    They removed Force march, one of the best mechanics of latest total war,

    the campaign is dumb down and if you are one of the major factions you can literally win the whole campaign in few turns once you have full stack. and settlements are so easy to take, u can do this with just 1 general, no units required if they had no one defending. (No garrison for minor settlements)

    they got rid of agents, trades, scouts, and dumb a lot of things down. Each campaign last only like 7 hours or so

    this should be an expansion for Attila, and Attila already have expansions and mods similar to this one

    they will charge you for Blood Pack after a month

    all the good reviews you see from Game critics are pointless since they all get paid to do it. and they don't show the truth    … Expand
  18. dwarfscotsman
    May 3, 2018
    7
    Looks like the average score from pro-critics are hitting the mark. Started a VH Circenn campaign, 1st battle AI was suicidal, 2nd battle was a river battle, my General got stuck on the bridge. BUG!
    Units look ok, bit too generic but that's reflective of the time period. Campaign map looks great, played custom battle at Dun Foither WOW what a battle map! Recruitment is back to MT2,    Looks like the average score from pro-critics are hitting the mark. Started a VH Circenn campaign, 1st battle AI was suicidal, 2nd battle was a river battle, my General got stuck on the bridge. BUG!
    Units look ok, bit too generic but that's reflective of the time period. Campaign map looks great, played custom battle at Dun Foither WOW what a battle map! Recruitment is back to MT2, at last CA you have seen the light! MT2 was your best game!    … Expand
  19. zaxes1234
    May 2, 2018
    2
    none of the great features WH I and II added and some of the worst of Attila
  20. chuchel
    May 28, 2018
    9
    An excellent Total War with refined mechanics, although many aspects are very minimized in terms of policy and treaties. Undoubtedly reminds me of Shogun 2, a specific geographical part where it develops, the units are very similar as in shogun 2 but nothing that excellent existing mods improves to 100%, I hope we do not bleed to the point of DLCs. I recommend it 100% very good.
  21. Talmanes
    May 3, 2018
    9
    A solid entry into the series and one that introduces some very welcome features, particularly considering it's a saga title and not a mainline entry. To start with, positives in no particular order:

    - The campaign map is absolutely gorgeous. It's huge and detailed. - The new recruitment mechanics make armies a lot more interesting. No elites on demand, you actually have to think    A solid entry into the series and one that introduces some very welcome features, particularly considering it's a saga title and not a mainline entry. To start with, positives in no particular order:

    - The campaign map is absolutely gorgeous. It's huge and detailed.
    - The new recruitment mechanics make armies a lot more interesting. No elites on demand, you actually have to think through what units you're going to recruit and when, as they take several turns to fully muster. Elite and retinue units actually feel valuable now.
    - The soundtrack is really immersive
    - The period appropriate art style works really well. The main menu background is beautiful
    - The siege battle maps are some of the best I've seen in any Total War game
    - No stupid AI refusing trade agreements. These are now automatic if you're at peace and have a connection between your capitals. Very welcome.
    - New province system is an interesting design choice. The lack of garrisons in minor settlements requires you think a bit more strategically about where you build up and where you station your armies. This can only be a good thing.
    - No agents! I always found these a chore in previous titles so glad to see them gone.
    - I like the added emphasis on generals/governors and 'followers' (basically a skill tree). A general's bodyguard unit size will increase with his command skill which is a really nice touch.
    - Narrative events are a welcome addition

    Negatives/Less good things

    - No ambush battles
    - No forced march. I don't really mind, but it is missing
    - No building trees. All buildings are linear upgrades. I like choice.
    - AI has good moments but it also has bad moments. Same as any Total War game
    - Some clipping issues occasionally and collision isn't always particularly satisfying. Sometimes it works really well though.

    All in all a really refreshing experience.

    Besides, it's £30, compared to the £150 I've spent on the Warhammer Total War titles. Yet I fully expect to get as many hours out of this. Highly recommended.    … Expand
  22. WindomEarle
    May 10, 2018
    5
    I hate it that comparing to Total War Shogun, this game is WAY TOO SIMPLIFIED. There is almost no plot, no videos showing consequences of your choices, the number of units is too low and after playing for 10 hours I haven't fought A SINGLE BATTLE in a castle - NOT EVEN ONE! I don't even know if it has been "cut out" from the series.
    Sure, they changed some of the things for better, like    I hate it that comparing to Total War Shogun, this game is WAY TOO SIMPLIFIED. There is almost no plot, no videos showing consequences of your choices, the number of units is too low and after playing for 10 hours I haven't fought A SINGLE BATTLE in a castle - NOT EVEN ONE! I don't even know if it has been "cut out" from the series.
    Sure, they changed some of the things for better, like there are no more annoying pop-up notifications that your general has been promoted - they have been consolidated into one small window at the top of the screen, but when it comes to campaign map, framerate still drops to 5FPS, after ending a round and it still takes forever for the AI to make its moves.
    Now, add some other things other players wrote about and you will know NOT TO buy this.. half of the game. Low price of this product should give you a hint, that this is not a full Total War game as they used to make them before.
    I would pay twice as much if they made Napoleon remake.    … Expand
  23. zorK90
    May 4, 2018
    8
    What's up with all these haters that come on here to just hate on the game I don't get it. I may change the score I have given the game after some more gametime, but after a few hours I feel it's a solid Total War game overall. There are some bold moves here by CA with removal of agents, some stances like forced march etc. but as well as some new way of doing things.

    I love the artwork    What's up with all these haters that come on here to just hate on the game I don't get it. I may change the score I have given the game after some more gametime, but after a few hours I feel it's a solid Total War game overall. There are some bold moves here by CA with removal of agents, some stances like forced march etc. but as well as some new way of doing things.

    I love the artwork and the new way of recruiting troops feels right. Battles are so far great and there are actual chokepoints in some maps haha.

    Not a bad game at all so far and definitely worth its pricetag.    … Expand
  24. Vargas78
    May 16, 2018
    7
    After playing it more i've marked it down from an 8, to a 7 out of 10. I find the A.I. to be too timid it rarely engages for a big battle or uses multi stack armies on the attack. And movement distance is too short considering one turn is meant to be 3 months. I'm ok with removal of agents but features like forced march or ambush should really be back in it.
    I still like the game though,    After playing it more i've marked it down from an 8, to a 7 out of 10. I find the A.I. to be too timid it rarely engages for a big battle or uses multi stack armies on the attack. And movement distance is too short considering one turn is meant to be 3 months. I'm ok with removal of agents but features like forced march or ambush should really be back in it.
    I still like the game though, especially the performance improvements over Attila. (Hopefully they can port these improvements into Attila). After the Warhammer games which are no.1 in this regard, Thrones has the best battle graphics to have been seen in a Total War game.
    Whilst larger battles (which aren't common) or sieges do still hit performance more, it's still better than what it was in Attila. I think the A.I. in Shogun 2, Rome 2 and Attila were all more decisive than what we have here, so I think it is something that can be fixed up to a point.    … Expand
  25. Gibbonici
    May 5, 2018
    8
    I've played most of the Total War games and this one is a worthy addition to the series. It took a bit of getting used to after the truly epic scale of the Warhammer ones and Empire (I'm a sucker for 18th Century history and have played that one to absolute death), but once you get the hang of it there's a surprising amount of depth that comes with the scale. There are various vitalI've played most of the Total War games and this one is a worthy addition to the series. It took a bit of getting used to after the truly epic scale of the Warhammer ones and Empire (I'm a sucker for 18th Century history and have played that one to absolute death), but once you get the hang of it there's a surprising amount of depth that comes with the scale. There are various vital mechanics regarding your generals that would be way too micro-managey in a larger scale game.

    Historically, the game is a pretty good depiction of late 9th century Britain, with the various factions occupying the right places and feeling as they should as you play them. There is a Welsh faction in Scotland, which seems a bit weird, but I guess that's a nod to the linguistically different Celts (the Brythonic speakers rather than the later-arriving Gaelic speakers).

    One thing that I've had issue with in a lot of Total War games is that the battles can get a bit formulaic. In Empire, for example, your formations are usually the same (musket in the middle, artillery on the flanks and cavalry on you far flanks) with little scope for variety, which means your battles play out more or less the same each time. I had similar issues with Medieval 2 and the Romes, but maybe that's just how I played them out.

    With Thrones of Britannia, there are nine standard deployments you can use and customise from, and so far I've found a very distinct use for each one depending on terrain, numbers and the type of opposing army. Similarly, there seems to be quite a lot of tactical variety in how you can play your battles out, and the timing and targets of your charges and counter-charges can win or lose a battle.

    It is a very big departure from the epic, OTT battles and strategies of the Warhammer games, and there seems to be a lot more nuance in the way that Thrones plays out. I can see how that would throw a lot of players, especially when you have to consider the loyalty and influence of your generals as well as the usual happiness in your provinces. Managing these elements are probably more important in the strategic layer than getting your production and technology chains built.

    I've also read a lot of complaints about missing mechanics, but the mechanics that are there (including the new ones) are there to reflect the social and military orders of the time. 9th century society wasn't anything like as organised as the Roman or feudal periods, and this becomes a natural part of the way the game plays.

    As a game set in a relatively small area with varied factional goals, cultures and internal intrigues, Thrones of Britannia works and plays well. In terms of pure gameplay it's not the best Total War game to date (say what you like but I have to give that to the Mortal Empires campaign in Warhammer 2), but as a serious historical game set in an interesting period, it's definitely up there - especially if you're bit of a history nerd.    … Expand
  26. Ilya_Markelov
    Dec 23, 2018
    10
    Один из лучших тотал варов со времен меда 2 и Сёгуна 2. В игре фундаментальные изменения по сравнению с предыдущими частями, абсолютно другая боёвка, очень напоминающая мед2 - с медленными разношерстными юнитами в одном отряде, с медленным откликом на приказ, половина идёт его выполнять - другая половина не идёт, кто-то убегает вперед, кто-то ранен и сильно отстал позади - вы видели такоеОдин из лучших тотал варов со времен меда 2 и Сёгуна 2. В игре фундаментальные изменения по сравнению с предыдущими частями, абсолютно другая боёвка, очень напоминающая мед2 - с медленными разношерстными юнитами в одном отряде, с медленным откликом на приказ, половина идёт его выполнять - другая половина не идёт, кто-то убегает вперед, кто-то ранен и сильно отстал позади - вы видели такое в Риме 2 или Атилле или Вархаммере? Там отряды клонов ровным строем носились, шаг в шаг. Здесь же - в корне иное поведение юнитов, ритм сражения, он гораздо медленней и реалистичней. Я залип в игруху на пару недель.
    Это потрясающая игра, в первую очередь для ценителей первого Рима и классики Medieval 2.    … Expand
  27. imagtx1080
    May 8, 2018
    10
    Bad Reviews are ten year olds, one is even saying this game cant be played in 4k, sure buddy thats why i am playing it on 4k with a gtx 1080 and a ryzen 5 1600 few settings on high instead of ultra and there you go great performance.

    Siege battles are Beast and Beautiful. Played 10 hours straight dont think a bad game can achieve that. Not to mention got it for 23 euros on release day.    Bad Reviews are ten year olds, one is even saying this game cant be played in 4k, sure buddy thats why i am playing it on 4k with a gtx 1080 and a ryzen 5 1600 few settings on high instead of ultra and there you go great performance.

    Siege battles are Beast and Beautiful. Played 10 hours straight dont think a bad game can achieve that. Not to mention got it for 23 euros on release day. What a bargain.

    It has over Average 20 fps more then Attila. If you say CA is Lazy you are a spoiled kid, updating and getting better performance out of an 32 bit Engine is not easy.

    Its a good game tons of fun Campaign Map is Huge as it should be in such a game and the most detailed also in the Series so far.

    You love Ragnar,Ivar, Alfred well thats kinda all in in the Story.    … Expand
  28. clivman
    May 3, 2018
    10
    Its an amazing game just beware people were threatening to review bomb it so many of the reviews with 0 stars are from people who never bought the game.
    It brings a lot of new features and removes a few (forced march, agents) that were hated in older games
  29. Sebson
    May 6, 2018
    9
    This is a great standalone title and well worth the price. It's also the most polished and bug-free TW release in years. Seemingly small changes to the mechanics add up to a different and pacier overall experience than Attila or AoC. Each faction I've played feels unique owing to their faction traits and politics. The campaign AI doesn't cheat as much, which means late-game's a little bitThis is a great standalone title and well worth the price. It's also the most polished and bug-free TW release in years. Seemingly small changes to the mechanics add up to a different and pacier overall experience than Attila or AoC. Each faction I've played feels unique owing to their faction traits and politics. The campaign AI doesn't cheat as much, which means late-game's a little bit too easy at the moment.

    ToB is an interesting departure from the typical TW format, which funnily enough feels like more of a return to form. I haven't enjoyed a campaign so thoroughly since Medieval 2. Ironically, the fan-base has been calling for Medieval 3 for years, yet many seem to have decided to review bomb this title before it was even released...because reasons, I guess? Anyway, if you like TW and if you like Viking Age Britain and Ireland, this game is for you.    … Expand
  30. sparten8
    Jun 17, 2018
    8
    New to the total war series have played a few in the past but not in depth. This game has made me a fan of the games I love this game and think it it very good I'd recommend this to anyone that like strategy game 100%. There are some challenging elements but is accessible to newer players and i think that is an aspect people that have played total war games for a while don't, but i stillNew to the total war series have played a few in the past but not in depth. This game has made me a fan of the games I love this game and think it it very good I'd recommend this to anyone that like strategy game 100%. There are some challenging elements but is accessible to newer players and i think that is an aspect people that have played total war games for a while don't, but i still think the game is good and love the time period and location.… Expand
  31. Ow41n
    Dec 17, 2019
    10
    I actually play this game more than the other total war games. And I've been playing since shogun originally released all those years ago. I dont know what it is I just cant put it down
  32. shadow2000m
    Aug 14, 2020
    9
    A very good game. A good Total War. Here's what Thrones of Britannia is.
    First officially "Saga" game, it succeeds in its objective and offers an interesting game with very good ideas.
    Despite the abandonment of the players, the game remains very good. The factions whatever one says about it remains very different between them and is not played at all the same. The events are cool, the    A very good game. A good Total War. Here's what Thrones of Britannia is.
    First officially "Saga" game, it succeeds in its objective and offers an interesting game with very good ideas.
    Despite the abandonment of the players, the game remains very good. The factions whatever one says about it remains very different between them and is not played at all the same. The events are cool, the map has surprisingly different landscapes and the area we are fighting has a real impact. Besides the battles are very fun thanks to these maps. Marshes, mountains, villages, etc ... it really matters.
    The game remains intense throughout the campaign unlike all Total War, and unlike Attila it is not because of constraint and penalties. It's because we can't make armies as we want, we have to think about where to go, how to move and where to make garrisons. And then the final invasion brings a real plus!
    The politics are cool without being heavy and the faction mechanics look good.
    In general, several ideas of the title were taken up later for other Total War.
    Only downside for me, it would need updates because the game still has some issues and bug that would be easy to fix.    … Expand
  33. jokerdeus
    Nov 26, 2018
    6
    Thrones of Britannia has a lot of great ideas, like supplies for armies and other things, unfortunately it feels like the game didn't receive much love. Unit balancing is very poor, and that leads to completely no brain strategies for battles. Just get the strongest infantry, send it in and watch... I usually get the most fun from Total War by having to optimise many armies with cheapThrones of Britannia has a lot of great ideas, like supplies for armies and other things, unfortunately it feels like the game didn't receive much love. Unit balancing is very poor, and that leads to completely no brain strategies for battles. Just get the strongest infantry, send it in and watch... I usually get the most fun from Total War by having to optimise many armies with cheap units and clever strategies. It's not really possible in this game, you just need strong infantry to wreck everybody.… Expand
  34. GJA
    Jan 30, 2020
    4
    Could have been a great time-period but the developers decided to be lazy *****. There isn't really anything special about this game.

    What it should have been: Bigger campaign map so you can raid France and England as the Vikings. Focus on religion and longboat superiority (even ability to sail up rivers). What we got: quick cashgrab by lazy developers. Nothing innovative and playing    Could have been a great time-period but the developers decided to be lazy *****. There isn't really anything special about this game.

    What it should have been: Bigger campaign map so you can raid France and England as the Vikings. Focus on religion and longboat superiority (even ability to sail up rivers).

    What we got: quick cashgrab by lazy developers. Nothing innovative and playing as the vikings is not that different than playing as the english...    … Expand
  35. LoletinAlexis
    Aug 25, 2018
    8
    At our disposal we will have 10 factions to play (Anglo-Saxon, Gaelic, Welsh or Viking), which in battle do not differ much and are quite equal in themselves in the game.
    It is a different Total War: the way of recruiting is different, I have noticed that there are more civil wars, the cavalry has improved a lot, the ramification of the Royal Family and the nobles has been modified, the    At our disposal we will have 10 factions to play (Anglo-Saxon, Gaelic, Welsh or Viking), which in battle do not differ much and are quite equal in themselves in the game.
    It is a different Total War: the way of recruiting is different, I have noticed that there are more civil wars, the cavalry has improved a lot, the ramification of the Royal Family and the nobles has been modified, the interface has changed a lot, etc.    … Expand
  36. GarethB
    Nov 11, 2018
    6
    Moderately enjoyable for awhile, but the small map and lack of challenge meant that I finished it rapidly and haven't really gone back to it, when it is competing with warhammer 2 for my time. Hopefully a Roman invasion of Britannia mod full conversion comes along soon.
  37. fmathez
    Apr 15, 2021
    8
    Très bon Total War. La touche graphique et l'univers sont très bien représenté. Je regrette juste un gros manque de diversité. Toutefois il reste très addictif.
  38. Adi321
    Sep 20, 2020
    0
    Without doubt the worst game of all Total War games. The game has no deep, the interface and graphic design is horrible and 40€ for this trash is a joke!
  39. Yaav13
    May 9, 2022
    4
    My truthful honorable incorruptible conclusive rating of this considered game: 4.
  40. dr-kenobi
    Sep 6, 2022
    7
    I mean it's alright. The AI sucks, but the overall setting and esthetics are good.
  41. erfunfazli
    Aug 23, 2023
    7
    Not bad but it's one of the weakest total war games who I ever played.
    Theme, historical time, map and factions are not cool. I think there is no good potential in this time and place. So it's a wrong choice. UI is not cool I don't like it. Gameplay is acceptable. But some details has some problems like recruitment system who I don't like it. The only thing in recruitment system I liked    Not bad but it's one of the weakest total war games who I ever played.
    Theme, historical time, map and factions are not cool. I think there is no good potential in this time and place. So it's a wrong choice. UI is not cool I don't like it. Gameplay is acceptable. But some details has some problems like recruitment system who I don't like it. The only thing in recruitment system I liked is units are not based on buildings.    … Expand

Awards & Rankings

73
#73 Most Discussed PC Game of 2018
12
#12 Most Shared PC Game of 2018

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
75

Generally favorable reviews - based on 51 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 29 out of 51
  2. Mixed: 22 out of 51
  3. Negative: 0 out of 51
  1. CD-Action
    Sep 27, 2018
    80
    Even though the AI is unable to learn from its failures and crack the player’s tactics, which makes later battles too easy, Thrones of Britannia is a game no strategy fan should overlook. [08/2018, p.74]
  2. PLAY! Zine
    Jul 18, 2018
    70
    Thrones of Britannia shifts usual pattern where storytelling is weakest part of Total War games to situation where it is it's best part in ToB. If AI and factions get upgrades, it might even turn out quite good.
    Read full review
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jul 13, 2018
    60
    The trip to the time of Alfred the Great is rather disappointing, though the game does not do anything horribly wrong. It's good, but the theme could have been grasped much better. [Issue#286]
See all critic reviews »