- Publisher: King.com , King.com Limited
- Release Date: Nov 14, 2012
User Score
Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 159 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 29 out of 159
-
Mixed: 28 out of 159
-
Negative: 102 out of 159
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Aug 28, 2014
-
Jan 23, 2014
-
Dec 19, 2014A heaping pile of **** that is addicting for awhile but gets boring after its repetitive levels and annoying almost sexual like voice-overs which say stupid things like "tasty" and "devine." Never again will I play this game.
-
Jan 24, 2014Let me use this qutation:
"The fact that King.com is serving orders to game companies around the world, disallowing them from using the individual words "candy" or "saga" (and I assume "crush", too) in their game titles, even when the games are COMPLETELY unrelated, has inspired me to never play their games again." -
Jan 4, 2014you are worst cheaters ever!!!!! i paid to score one point first £0.69, then £0.69 then £1.49, £1.49 and more and more and more!!! for one point!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
fy!c!!!!!
regards B. -
Feb 12, 2014OMG, what a money-whore game. The price increases each time you buy it, and King.com has trademarked the words "Candy", "Crush". This is basically a copy of the awesome Bejeweld. Reasons why not to play this game. It seems modern, but this type of game is more than 13 years old.
-
Dec 11, 2013
-
Dec 8, 2013
-
Jun 12, 2014
-
Aug 7, 2014this game is not adicting it is just stopidneis !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Feb 10, 2014
-
Jan 21, 2014This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Jan 26, 2014Let me use this quotation:"The fact that King.com is serving orders to game companies around the world, disallowing them from using the individual words "candy" or "saga" (and I assume "crush", too) in their game titles, even when the games are COMPLETELY unrelated, has inspired me to never play their games again." Their greed for gold beats even that of the dragons.
-
Feb 8, 2014It is true, this game is addicting. So, however, is crack. Also, my all-consuming crack addiction is much cheaper. tl;dr: don't play Candy Crush , do crack instead.
-
Feb 14, 2014
-
Feb 16, 2014
-
Jan 3, 2015
-
Mar 18, 2015Rip off!! Only way to really play is to pay for their stupid boosters. If its not a FREE game, say so. Getting you to play, with no good chance of enjoying it without paying for their crap is BS!
-
Aug 13, 2015
-
Jan 23, 2014Sometimes you can judge a game off its content alone... sometimes you have to judge a game by the actions of its creators. King ltd. the creators, are bullying a wide range of other developers using unethical means. I simply cannot, in good faith, render a positive rating to a game made using bad behavior.
-
Feb 6, 2014This game is just a money-grabbing attempt of the match-three genre. Not to mention the poor practices of its company in blocking trademark requests because of the word "saga."
-
Jan 29, 2014
-
Apr 18, 2014I hate this game so much. How many times has it made me rage when it's supposed to entertain me?
And then King has the nerve to raise the price for all in app purchases. Not that I was ever stupid enough to fall for their shameful money grabbing ways. -
Oct 15, 2015
-
Jan 3, 2018Hikaye = -
Oynanış = -
Grafikler = -
Sesler = -
Keyif = -
Atmosfer = -
Süre = - -
Jan 5, 2018
-
Jan 27, 2014
-
Mar 19, 2014
-
Jun 8, 2014
-
Jul 28, 2014Not a great game, terrible replay value, and it wants you to pay. Why it used to be so popular? I dunno. .
Awards & Rankings
-
Oct 30, 2013Candy Crush Saga has become a massive hit not only because it's free and fun, but because it provides a great value with well-balanced gameplay mechanics.
-
Apple'N'AppsApr 15, 2013Candy Crush Saga (Free,Universal) is a tasty treat that delivers so much to enjoy, that you might get cavities.
-
Mar 17, 2013Candy Crush Saga is a fun, simple puzzle game, with lots of different missions but a few too many IAPs.