- Publisher: Kemco
- Release Date: Dec 18, 2001
Buy Now
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
You'll spend far too much time in the park, and not enough in the attractions, and that's just not very fun, no matter how old you are.
-
While not as bad as the majority of critics are reporting it's certainly not worthy of a full price title.
-
Electronic Gaming MonthlyShould be plenty fun for the very young ones in your family. [Mar 2002, p.141]
-
Nintendo PowerThey have such wonderful monsters to draw from, but dont really use them. [Jan 2002, p.127]
-
Game InformerThe Waterworld "attraction" (actually a thirty-second clip of a plane crashing into the water) is the lamest thing I've ever seen, except for myself naked. Yuck! [Mar 2002, p.81]
-
Too few mini-games, too little fun, and frustrating navigation ruin what is essentially an interesting concept. The whole debacle lasts approximately three hours, the first of which is spent locating all of the attractions and being told you cant enter.
-
To think this dire piece of programming is worth 40p, let along £40 is an insult to everything we believe in as dedicated gamers. Buy it...go on, we dare you. Youll be the only fool that does...
-
Too frustrating and convoluted for kids to have any fun with it, and all but the most desperate adult GameCube fans will find it tedious and unentertaining as well.
-
Pure tedium.
-
A collection of mediocre to annoying titles that are over within minutes.
-
This game just sucks. Avoid at all costs. In fact, don't even pretend that this exists.
Awards & Rankings
|
20
|
|
|
12
|
#12 Most Discussed GameCube Game of 2001
|
|
7
|
#7 Most Shared GameCube Game of 2001
|
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 2 out of 13
-
Mixed: 2 out of 13
-
Negative: 9 out of 13
-
MattS.Nov 4, 2003
-
Mar 23, 2020
-
Apr 3, 2019