Serious Sam: Next Encounter
GameCube- Publisher: Global Star Software
- Release Date: Apr 12, 2004
- Also On: PlayStation 2
User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 15 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 12 out of 15
-
Mixed: 1 out of 15
-
Negative: 2 out of 15
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
RyencokeMar 31, 2005This game is just horrible.
-
-
RuzM.May 5, 2004Real good no brainer fun. Fast frame rate and loads to kill kill kill! great for picking up and playing in a 5 min coffee break!
-
-
BobthebuilderJul 1, 2004This game is brilliant and I have never played on anything better but one thing how do you drive the serious sub and what level I have found it but I cannot drive it. it just takes you to the next level.
-
-
FattyArbuckleApr 22, 2004This game is DA BIZ - NEVER HAD SO MUCH FUN!! POINT SHOOT KILL MAIM AND DESTROY... Apply valium... ahhh!
-
-
Feb 26, 2022This game's a step above both the Serious Sam games to come before it. The addition of vehicles, alternate ammo types, a faster-pace, and a points-combo system add to replayability and fun factor.
-
Jun 11, 2022im not that old but this game was my childhood istg i played it whenever i could and loved it sm
Awards & Rankings
|
52
|
|
|
39
|
#39 Most Discussed GameCube Game of 2004
|
-
Edge MagazineNext Encounter is one of the grandest and busiest console battlefields yet created. This is a spiritual update to Space Invaders, a one-trick pony that kicks harder than most FPS thoroughbreds, making the "Medal of Honour" series seem like a vain diva by comparison. [June 2004, p.109]
-
AceGamezIt provides the perfect environment for a quick blast about, either on your own against endless hordes of colourful monsters, or with a friend.
-
games(TM)By trying to compete in the 'ultimate first-person shooter' squabble, many a title finds its grasp underplayed by its reach. The beauty of Serious Sam is its totally nonchalent attitude towards the genre and the way it plays what could be seen as its weakest card as its strength. [June 2004, p.109]