Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

 GameCube
Metascore
69

Mixed or average reviews - based on 20 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 20
  2. Mixed: 15 out of 20
  3. Negative: 0 out of 20
Buy Now
Buy on
  1. Nintendo Power
    85
    A great leap forward for the Potter franchise, and a fun and inclusive gaming experience. [Jan 2006, p.107]
    All this publication's reviews
  2. PGNx Media
    80
    The game changes a few of the things Harry fans have come to expect from the games, and though aimed at a younger audience, Harry fans will find a lot to like in the game.
  3. GameZone
    75
    While it could have had more movie/book elements tied into the gaming experience, the existing game is fun enough.
  5. Play Magazine
    75
    A fine, if not predictable, bit of movie gaming. [Jan 2006, p.49]
    All this publication's reviews
  6. eToychest
    75
    Series fans will find a lot to love in this title, which offers an attractive, immersive, and most importantly, fun excursion into the world of J.K. Rowling's imaginative works.
  7. GameSpot
    73
    It's a worthwhile platforming experience for hardcore Potter fans, but some may be put off by all the collection quests and backtracking.
  8. IGN
    72
    The game's not perfect. There are some camera issues. Some AI issues. And I really would have preferred to have more control over spells. But it still arrives as a solid entry to the series. Kids will probably like it a lot.
  9. Armchair Empire
    70
    A game parents will be able to safely play with their pre-teen kids.
  10. Cheat Code Central
    70
    The linear nature of the gameplay ensures that you will be forced into the various scenes as the director and developer intended. The puzzles and mini-games are fun but they are like eating candy floss; there's not much nourishment.
  11. NintendoWorldReport
    70
    Having three wizards running around and casting spells at the same time allows for some interesting gameplay, but you'll only get to experience it if you have friends to play with.
  12. Pelit (Finland)
    70
    Nothing more than a bunch of minigames that suffer from an awkward camera system. [Dec 2005]
    All this publication's reviews
  13. GameSpy
    70
    The constant action means the Harry Potter series has always lent itself well to the video-game format, and thankfully (albeit surprisingly) EA has mostly improved upon their winning formula, while upping the ante visually and adding welcome multiplayer features, easily making the Goblet of Fire their best adaptation yet.
  14. N-Insanity
    68
    In the end, GoF is an action game aimed specifically at younger players. There's simply not enough diversity to keep a more seasoned gamer entertained for long periods of time.
  15. Game Informer
    65
    Goblet of Fire is the best console Harry Potter action game yet, but it's still a far cry from good. [Dec 2005, p.161]
    All this publication's reviews
  16. Jolt Online Gaming UK
    60
    Somewhat annoyingly, the game often requires you to tackle each level a multiple number of times in order to collect items such as shields before the next area is unlocked.
  17. GamePro
    60
    The inability of this series to learn from its mistakes is baffling. You'll often find yourself fighting enemies you can't see because some decorative element in the foreground entirely blocks your view, and you've zero control over the camera.
  18. G4 TV
    60
    A mostly average button masher that has the good luck of being associated with the hottest kids' property to come along in years.
  19. The Sydney Morning Herald
    60
    The highlight is a brief but thrilling broomstick chase against a fire-breathing dragon. An underwater interlude is less successful, although it provides variety.
  20. AceGamez
    50
    Seasoned gamers will find very little of interest here, regardless of how massive a Harry Potter fan you are (personally I love the books and the films).
    All this publication's reviews
  21. Total Video Games
    50
    An unbelievably lazy title that just feels cheap. It has poor gameplay that the target audience will just fall asleep at, which only adds to the infuriating realisation that it will still sell thanks to the lightning scarred teen's name.

Awards & Rankings

44
#44 Best GameCube Game of 2005
37
#37 Most Discussed GameCube Game of 2005
39
#39 Most Shared GameCube Game of 2005

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
5.3

Mixed or average reviews- based on 24 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 24
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 24
  3. Negative: 10 out of 24
  1. MetaBones
    Apr 6, 2023
    2
    Goblet of Fire was one of my favorite Harry Potter films and the Triwizard tournament would translate brilliantly into a game, on paper thatGoblet of Fire was one of my favorite Harry Potter films and the Triwizard tournament would translate brilliantly into a game, on paper that is.

    I felt like this game was a drag and lazy throughout its level design with uninspired puzzles and minimal engagement throughout. Worst of all, however, was the mechanics. Orienting yourself with the camera physically hurt and getting your character's movement and spells right was honestly a matter of a coin toss. The mechanical experience of the game was just unbearable to me.

    There were some great ideas in the game and I didn't see too much of a performance dip unless lots of visual action was happening but the game overall is just a bland and awful experience. It's not worth the money and it's not worth any time.    … Full Review »
  2. DanielGG91
    Nov 15, 2022
    6
    Juego mejorable en muchos sentidos, aún así lo recomiendo para los fans de la saga, ya que no deja de ser una buena experiencia.
  3. Thaddaeus
    Jul 2, 2022
    2
    Terrible game, bad gameplay, no charm in the voice acting (except mad eye moody), tedious to collect shields, no real cutscenes, no uniqueTerrible game, bad gameplay, no charm in the voice acting (except mad eye moody), tedious to collect shields, no real cutscenes, no unique spells, and only 8 levels I can beat it in 4 hrs. It’s boring not fun, and one of the worst games in the series, just like the movie it does understand it’s source material.… Full Review »
See all user reviews »