Yu-Gi-Oh! The Sacred Cards
Game Boy Advance- Publisher: Konami
- Release Date: Nov 4, 2003
User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 38 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 17 out of 38
-
Mixed: 15 out of 38
-
Negative: 6 out of 38
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
J.G.Dec 16, 2003I should have listened to these people. The game sucks and i dont like how they changed the whole cards...stupid...the 3 cards are good though, and the story also...
-
-
NikoL.Nov 19, 2003This has a good story line but the duel system is really horrible.the duels do not have the official yu-gi-oh dueling rules and whats up with the dueling "level" and "dueling points"
-
-
Jan 13, 2012It was interesting to see a Yu-Gi-Oh RPG but it severely lacked content and replay value. You only had to beat opponents one time before advancing in the game and the entire game only took a few hours to beat. It was faithful to the series though and it was an interesting concept but a failed game none the less.
-
Aug 28, 2020I`m not the biggest YU-GI-OH! fan but if you want to rock some matches without carrying your card decks with you, The Sacred Cards is perfect for you! The gameplay is a bit simplified but still fun and it even has some small RPG moments in it.
-
Aug 31, 2021....................................................................................................................................................................................................blank
Awards & Rankings
|
81
|
|
|
20
|
#20 Most Discussed Game Boy Advance Game of 2003
|
-
An excellent game, but I would have to recommend Worldwide Edition: Stairway to the Destined Duel to Yu-Gi-Oh! fanatics over this game.
-
The RPG side of the game is limited to running around town and finding opponents to duel, but the duelist leveling system does add a new wrinkle to the gameplay.
-
Regardless of your skill, everyone will be thankful for the improved battle interface. [Feb 2004, p.114]