The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
Game Boy Advance- Publisher: Sierra Entertainment
- Release Date: Sep 24, 2002
- Also On: PC, PlayStation 2
Buy Now
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
Most distressingly, inventory management is a total nightmare; identifying and using a healing shroom is an amazingly laborious process.
-
Electronic Gaming MonthlyIt ain't particularly exciting, but it ain't exactly bad, either. [Dec 2002, p.272]
-
Pocket GamesWhile LOTR hits a lot of highs, the overall quest and gameplay are just a little better than average. It's a strong rental. [Spring 2003, p.40]
-
Then there's the TERRIBLE fight sequences -- the book's magic may not be as flashy and constant as a Final Fantasy game, but at least the hack-and-slash could have been more engrossing.
-
Rings strikes me as a game where the developers seized on the most immediate details (that of the visual scenery and all the supporting cast) and suddenly lost scope of the entire game.
-
Delivers much of what fans might want from an RPG. And the graphics and music are sweet. But there's a lot here to make players sleepy as well.
-
Play MagazineRather than pressing left to walk left proportionately with the landscape, you must mash the diagonals, ultimately wearing an indelible groove into your thumb. [Nov 2002, p.103]
-
Cheat Code CentralI found the interface to be more problematic than most games of this genre.
-
What could have been a nice game for LOTR fans instead became a lesson in frustration because of the bugs.
-
A few small sub quests (such as delivering a message for someone) do not lift the title out of the sea of mediocrity its floating in.
-
Nintendo PowerFeatures characters and situations that are missing from the recent film adaptation. [Dec 2002, p.222]
-
Game InformerI think I'd rather have Gandalf turn me into something unnatural - like a hairy newt - rather than play this game again. [Dec 2002, p.150]
-
Remarkably enough, the controls are worse than the graphics...If you're looking for a great Tolkien experience, go to your local library and read the books.
-
It is slow, annoying and simply boring.
-
Its plagued by poor design, flooded with glitches and fails to capture any of the drama or emotion present in the book or the movie.
-
The entire game is so unpolished and full of bugs that it's unfathomable how it ever passed quality assurance in the first place.
-
One of the buggiest games ever released for the GBA, if not one of the buggiest games ever released, period. One flaw even makes it impossible to complete the game.
-
netjakOne of the worst games I have ever played. It is an underdeveloped, bug-ridden title that is an insult to Game Boy Advance owners and Lord of the Rings fans alike.
Awards & Rankings
|
98
|
|
|
19
|
#19 Most Discussed Game Boy Advance Game of 2002
|
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 6 out of 13
-
Mixed: 2 out of 13
-
Negative: 5 out of 13
-
Aug 24, 2023
-
MasterchiefDec 21, 2006The worst game i ever played has about a thousand glitches.
-
JohnR.Feb 13, 2004Great following of the story line decent graphics(especially for an RPG) but the fighting and glitches dont make it special.