Pac-Man Collection

 Game Boy Advance
  • Publisher: Namco
  • Release Date: Jul 12, 2001
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 13 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 10 out of 13
  2. Mixed: 3 out of 13
  3. Negative: 0 out of 13
Buy Now
Buy on
  1. GamerWeb Nintendo
    70
    Each game can be played for a few minutes at a time or a few hours at a time if you're addicted.
  2. Electronic Gaming Monthly
    53
    It's an uneven collection where high scores disappear when the power goes off, just like they did in the '80s. [Oct 2001, p.158]
    All this publication's reviews
  3. Nintendophiles
    50
    There is some refreshing additions to gameplay, but the replay value is diminishing as this game gets older... It's old yet somewhat refreshing.

Awards & Rankings

20
#20 Best Game Boy Advance Game of 2001
26
#26 Most Discussed Game Boy Advance Game of 2001

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
7.9

Generally favorable reviews- based on 9 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 9
  2. Mixed: 4 out of 9
  3. Negative: 0 out of 9
  1. Watermelon789
    Jul 11, 2011
    7
    Nice collection, but it gets dry after a few hours and even if there are 4 games ( if i don't mistake seriously, i do not even remember) itNice collection, but it gets dry after a few hours and even if there are 4 games ( if i don't mistake seriously, i do not even remember) it falls to short for what it could have been an outstanding package otherwise do not eat to much pellets it gets boring. Pac Man it's getting sick with that.… Full Review »
  2. MadnessisRising
    Mar 6, 2019
    6
    It was my first GBA-game and it is not a bad one i think. Anyway I was never so much into Pac-man. I think it's great nostalgia for olderIt was my first GBA-game and it is not a bad one i think. Anyway I was never so much into Pac-man. I think it's great nostalgia for older people like me. Still the Pac-man-tetris-mode was fun. Overall it got boring after a few hours playing.… Full Review »
  3. WojtekS.
    Sep 28, 2003
    9
    Very, very GOOD.
See all user reviews »