• Publisher: Acclaim
  • Release Date: Nov 28, 2000
Metascore
38

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 8 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 8
  2. Negative: 5 out of 8
Buy Now
Buy on
  1. If you're a hard-core video game wrestling fan with a cadre of game systems, there are better choices.
  2. Dreamcast HQ
    60
    One thing ECW:AR walks all over the competition with are options and matches. I have never seen so many type of matches in a game before.
  3. One of the deepest games ever created. Too bad all the time spent with the options couldn't have been devoted to gameplay instead.
  4. CNET Gamecenter
    40
    Although the sheer volume of wrestling personalities and gameplay options prevent it from being a complete write-off, it still ranks somewhere between late-night infomercials and the Jerry Springer Show for outright entertainment value.
  5. In keeping with the fine ECW tradition, this game is a vile piece of garbage that's a rip-off at half the price.
  6. Acclaim needs a new engine and they need it to be radiclly different.
  7. It's as tired and useless as many of the wrestlers represented, and playing this is almost like watching a seniors match in wrestling -- old familiar faces doing the same old, familiar moves that made them famous.
  8. Daily Radar
    0
    Rulz is an ass sandwich. We took a bite so you don't have to.

Awards & Rankings

78
38
#38 Most Discussed Dreamcast Game of 2000
User Score
6.8

Mixed or average reviews- based on 8 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 8
  2. Negative: 3 out of 8
  1. Jan 23, 2021
    10
    ECW ECW ECW ECW Rob van dam sabu Justin credible DA Sandman #GOAT ECW ECW ECW
  2. R.Campbell
    Mar 4, 2006
    1
    A carbon copy of WFF Attitude's gameplay, but with worse graphics, sounds and match type. Stay way clear of this complete dripple. The A carbon copy of WFF Attitude's gameplay, but with worse graphics, sounds and match type. Stay way clear of this complete dripple. The one point, by the way, was because of the good opening movie! Full Review »
  3. [Anonymous]
    Dec 13, 2004
    10
    STUFF!!!!!!