For 366 reviews, this critic has graded:
  • 55% higher than the average critic
  • 3% same as the average critic
  • 42% lower than the average critic
On average, this critic grades 7.3 points lower than other critics. (0-100 point scale)

Tom Russo's Scores

  • Movies
  • TV
Average review score: 58
Highest review score: 100 Richard III
Lowest review score: 25 The Food of the Gods
Score distribution:
  1. Negative: 53 out of 366
366 movie reviews
    • 42 Metascore
    • 38 Tom Russo
    This last angle had us thinking back to “Risky Business,” as did the Chicago setting and the reveling gone off the rails. Here, though, there’s no edge to the wildness, nothing memorable.
    • 81 Metascore
    • 75 Tom Russo
    If you’ve ever been fortunate enough to visit this corner of the world, you’ll instantly recognize the blissful natural grandeur that Moana captures, as well as the Pacific’s intimidating vastness.
    • 77 Metascore
    • 75 Tom Russo
    This is less a throwback to cutely misunderstood Molly Ringwald than to “My So-Called Life” — but with our high-school heroine stuck in a spiral like Claire Danes never knew.
    • 55 Metascore
    • 50 Tom Russo
    The movie would benefit from spending even more quiet moments with Glover.
    • 55 Metascore
    • 75 Tom Russo
    A Cinderella subplot involving the prince’s scullery maid (Zooey Deschanel) is similarly both familiar and tonally refreshing, from the whimsical vocals to the disco skate that subs for a glass slipper.
    • 72 Metascore
    • 75 Tom Russo
    The upshot: The movie develops a distinctively trippy identity.
    • 34 Metascore
    • 63 Tom Russo
    The best moments come in seeing Galifianakis’s costars try to keep up with him as he finally, frantically lets loose.
    • 47 Metascore
    • 63 Tom Russo
    It all makes for competent but routine suspense.
    • 51 Metascore
    • 38 Tom Russo
    The film’s lone strength is the fleeting dramatic scenes offering a little back story — and pathos — on Rafe’s home life with his sweetly understanding single mom (Lauren Graham, who you’d guess wouldn’t have bothered otherwise).
    • 57 Metascore
    • 75 Tom Russo
    The movie bogs down only toward the finish, when it turns into a metahuman free-for-all.
    • 56 Metascore
    • 75 Tom Russo
    The result is a story that’s awfully scattered thematically, but one with such inventive wit and screwball-quick pacing that issues like spongy motivation hardly seem to matter.
    • 47 Metascore
    • 63 Tom Russo
    Aussie Rosalie Ham’s quirky gothic novel is too tonally erratic to be completely satisfying. But we do get two Kates for the price of one, in a sense, as this crazy quilt of a movie allows her to play both entertainingly vampy and vulnerable.
    • 36 Metascore
    • 38 Tom Russo
    The Wild Life, while pleasant, is just too flat to meet the challenge.
    • 53 Metascore
    • 75 Tom Russo
    Krasinski infuses The Hollars with familiar wry humor, but he also delivers a film that’s unexpectedly rich with sweetly moving moments.
    • 58 Metascore
    • 63 Tom Russo
    The film comes across as an irksome contrivance. What’s meant to communicate the mysterious, even taboo allure of playing chameleon instead just leaves us scoffing.
    • 48 Metascore
    • 50 Tom Russo
    At its best, the movie is provocative, sleekly assured, and a legit showcase for its intriguingly deep ensemble
    • 54 Metascore
    • 63 Tom Russo
    The highlight is Duran and Arcel’s bonding in the corner between rounds. We’ll take more of this revealing brand of drama anytime.
    • 71 Metascore
    • 50 Tom Russo
    An original thriller about a home-invasion robbery gone wrong. To clarify, that would be “wrong” as in “not according to plan” – but also “wrong” as in “so dementedly repugnant, it just isn’t right.”
    • 68 Metascore
    • 50 Tom Russo
    The role of investment banker Naomi Bishop seems right for Gunn, no question, and it’s one that she approaches with conviction. So why is it so hard to root for her, or for any of the characters here?
    • 71 Metascore
    • 75 Tom Russo
    Lowery’s update turns out to be one of the summer’s best surprises, a gorgeous, magical reworking that deftly strikes that once-elusive balance between contemporary and quaint.
    • 78 Metascore
    • 50 Tom Russo
    Despite the material’s fit, the story’s relentlessly downbeat tone is challenging. Strong performances by Logan Lerman (“Fury”) and Sarah Gadon (Hulu’s “11.22.63”) can’t keep the film from feeling like exhaustingly slow going.
    • 59 Metascore
    • 63 Tom Russo
    It’s comedy with a hint of honesty — but we’re fine with shallow and sparkly, dahling.
    • 34 Metascore
    • 50 Tom Russo
    The riot of color here brings to mind what the makers of “Ice Age” delivered with “Rio,” which in turn reminds us that these animators certainly aren’t just one-trick talents. Could be time for them to show us some new ones.
    • 66 Metascore
    • 63 Tom Russo
    The movie’s best moments illustrate the lines that Mazur won’t cross, plus a few that he will.
    • 61 Metascore
    • 63 Tom Russo
    Its animal spin on unlikely-buddies interplay is amusing enough, but hardly as inspired as the teaser promised.
    • 81 Metascore
    • 75 Tom Russo
    Polished? Not exactly. Poignant? Definitely.
    • 63 Metascore
    • 75 Tom Russo
    Hegedus and Pennebaker do solid work presenting Wise’s arguments. It’s a tricky narrative challenge to shift from inherently compelling wildlife scenes to abstract courtroom debate, but the film manages it capably, even spicing things up with one justice’s admonition that Wise needs to cut his slavery analogies.
    • 51 Metascore
    • 50 Tom Russo
    Elle Fanning is impeccably cast as Jesse, a quiet, sweet-natured ingénue shuttling between sketchy photo shoots and her clichéd newcomer’s digs in a seedy Pasadena motel.
    • 59 Metascore
    • 63 Tom Russo
    If there’s one popcorn movie so far this summer that actually makes us fear for — and care for — its protagonist, this is it.
    • 56 Metascore
    • 63 Tom Russo
    The film is surprisingly light on conflict and definitely goes a bit heavy on period bromantic bonhomie. Even so, it’s an intriguing study of the personalities and torturous process behind some of the early 20th century’s great writing.

Top Trailers