Pauline Kael
Select another critic »For 828 reviews, this critic has graded:
-
26% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
72% lower than the average critic
On average, this critic grades 2.8 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Pauline Kael's Scores
- Movies
- TV
| Average review score: | 63 | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest review score: | The Lavender Hill Mob | |
| Lowest review score: | Revolution | |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 372 out of 828
-
Mixed: 406 out of 828
-
Negative: 50 out of 828
828
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- The New Yorker
Posted Jun 25, 2025 -
- Pauline Kael
An existential thriller--the most original and shocking French melodrama of the 50s.- The New Yorker
Posted Jul 1, 2020 -
- Pauline Kael
Even though the movie retreats into its narrow story line, you come out with a sense of epic horror and the perception that this white master race is retarded.- The New Yorker
Posted May 15, 2020 -
- Pauline Kael
This lushly romantic creation, directed by Marcel Carne and written by Jacques Prevert, is a one-of-a-kind film, a sumptuous epic about the relations between theatre and life.- The New Yorker
Posted Apr 16, 2020 -
- Pauline Kael
The film, directed by Perry Henzell, is feverish and haphazard, but the music redeems much of it, and the rhythmic swing of the Jamaican speech is hypnotic.- The New Yorker
Posted Oct 3, 2019 -
- Pauline Kael
This piece of Pop Art Americana is a clever, generally engaging screwball comedy.- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
It may be the most sophisticated political satire ever made in Hollywood. (As quoted by Roger Ebert)- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
The script (John Farris's adaptation of his novel) is cheap gothic espionage occultism involving two superior beings--spiritual twins (Andrew Stevens and Amy Irving) who have met only telepathically. But the film is so visually compelling that a viewer seems to have entered a mythic night world; no Hitchcock thriller was ever so intense, went so far, or had so many "classic" sequences.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
This is a polished light comedy in the "continental" style -- a sophisticated romantic trifle, with Dietrich more chic and modern than in her von Sternberg pictures.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Harlow is intensely liable, delivering her zingy wisecracks with a wonderful dirty good humor, and Gable is at that early peak in his career when he is so sizzlingly sexual that it seems both funny and natural for the two women to be fighting over him.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
An almost perfect visual equivalent of the Dashiell Hammett thriller...It is (and this is rare in American films) a work of entertainment that is yet so skillfully constructed that after many years and many viewings it has the same brittle explosiveness - and even some of the same surprise - that it had in its first run.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
A B-picture classic. This plain and inexpensive piece of science fiction employs few of the resources of the cinema (to put it mildly), but it has an idea that confirms everyone's suspicions.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Michael Ritchie's direction is highly variable in quality, but he's a whiz at catching details of frazzled behaviour.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
This slapstick adventure comedy is in the commercial genre of Raiders of the Lost Ark, but it's a simpler, more likable entertainment than Raiders; it doesn't leave you feeling exhausted.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Jane Fonda in possibly her finest dramatic performance, as Bree, an intelligent, high-bracket call girl, in Alan J. Pakula's murder-melodrama.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Directed by Irvin Kershner, the film has a few shocking fast cuts, but it also has scabrous elegance and a surprising amount of humor.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
James Stewart is charming and even a little bit sexy as the mild-mannered Destry.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
It's intensely enjoyable--in some ways the best of Hitchcock's American films.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
The most spirited satisfying Western epic in several years--it may seem a little loose at first, but it gets better and better as it goes along and you get the fresh, crazy hang of it.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
The whole thing became amorphous and confused. Paramount did rather better by the romance than the politics; Ingrid Bergman is lovely and affecting as Maria.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
A rowdy burlesque of the Dracula movies, set in Manhattan, with dilapidated stuffed bats and a large assortment of gags; some of them are funny in a low-grade, moldy way, and some are even stupidly racist, but many are weirdly hip, with a true flaky wit.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
This is the fanciest, most carefully assembled enigma yet put on screen...Using du Maurier as a base, Roeg comes closer to getting Borges on the screen than those who have tried it directly, but there's a distasteful clamminess about the picture. Roeg's style is in love with disintegration.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
The story and the acting make the film emotionally powerful. And Nicholson, looking punchy, tired, and baffled--and not on top of his character (as he is often is)--lets you see into him, rather than controlling what he lets you see.- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
This romantic comedy-fantasy about a mermaid (Daryl Hannah) who falls in love with a New Yorker (tom Hanks) has a friendly, tantalizing magic.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
This lyrical tragicomedy is perhaps Godard's most delicately charming film.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
The director, Irving Rapper, is just barely competent, and the action plods along, yet this picture is all of a piece, and if it were better it might not work at all. This way, it's a schlock classic.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
The scenes involving Gould and Cannon are small miracles of timing; Cannon (who looks a bit like Lauren Bacall and a bit like Jeanne Moreau, but the wrong bits) is also remarkably funny in her scenes with an analyst (played by the analyst Donald F. Muhich). You can feel something new in the comic spirit of this film - in the way Mazursky gets laughs by the rhythm of cliches, defenses, and little verbal aggressions.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
The first time you see this film, you're likely to find it silly, autoerotic, static, absurd, and you may feel cheated after having heard so much about it. But though it may seem to have no depth, you're not likely to forget it -- it has a suggestiveness unlike any other film.- The New Yorker