SHOWTIME | Release Date: August 7, 2005
CRITIC SCORE DISTRIBUTION
71
METASCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 85 Critic Reviews
Positive:
61
Mixed:
22
Negative:
2
Watch Now
Buy on
Stream On
100
NewsdayDiane WertsJul 11, 2013
Season 3 Review: Every character bursts with life here, in what may be the most fully realized show on TV. [13 Aug 2007]
100
New York PostLinda StasiJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: The best new show this season. [5 Aug 2005]
90
San Jose Mercury News/Contra Costa TimesCharlie McCollumJul 11, 2013
Season 3 Review: While Botwin's crime world is the engine that drives "Weeds," there is much more to the show than that. At its core, it's a subtle satire of suburban life, politics, social mores and race. [13 Aug 2007]
90
Chicago TribuneMaureen RyanJul 11, 2013
Season 3 Review: One of the best things about “Weeds” is how efficiently it moves forward; it’s an incredibly well-paced half-hour that always leaves you wanting more. [13 Aug 2007]
90
NewsweekMarc PeyserJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: A first-rate show with a wonderful cast... and a delicious satirical streak. [1 Aug 2005]
90
The Hollywood ReporterCynthia LittletonJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: "Weeds" is a blast, a wry, well-written look at the life of the pot dealer next door in small-screen suburbia. [1 Aug 2005]
83
Boston HeraldAmy AmatangeloJul 11, 2013
Season 3 Review: The humor is more subversive than ever. [13 Aug 2007]
83
The Detroit NewsMekeisha Madden TobyJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: Smarter and more creative than ABC's "Desperate Housewives," that other show about superficial suburbia, "Weeds" has edgier and wittier writing. [6 Aug 2005]
83
Entertainment WeeklyKen Tucker
Season 2 Review: [It] sometimes tries a bit too hard. Mellow out, dudes--we're addicted already. [18 Aug 2006, p.128]
80
Baltimore SunDavid ZurawikJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: The triumph of Parker's performance - just like that of James Gandolfini's depiction of Tony Soprano - is that she makes one care about Botwin in spite of all her flaws. [7 Aug 2005]
75
Chicago Sun-TimesDoug ElfmanJul 11, 2013
Season 3 Review: The new episodes find the upper-middle-class mother of two evolving into a gangster. This is a good move for the show. [13 Aug 2007]
75
New York Daily NewsDavid BianculliJul 11, 2013
Season 3 Review: This isn't the best role TV can give Parker, but it'll do for now. [13 Aug 2007]
75
Houston ChronicleMike McDanielJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: A deliciously witty comedy with stark dramatic touches. [6 Aug 2005]
75
San Diego Union-TribuneRobert P. LaurenceJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: Comparisons will be made to ABC's "Desperate Housewives," but "Weeds" is meaner and sharper, eschewing the chirpy attitude that blunts the sting of most plot turns in "Housewives." [5 Aug 2005]
75
Chicago Sun-TimesDoug ElfmanJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: "Weeds" comes from a Hollywood la-la land that is too crammed with trauma and wit to be real. But it's just entertaining enough to be watchable, despite the fact that it doesn't seem to be going anywhere dramatically deep. [4 Aug 2005]
75
Detroit Free PressMike DuffyJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: Because it is wisely anchored in the marvelous performances of Parker and Perkins, "Weeds" packs a merrily subversive comic energy. [5 Aug 2005]
75
New York Daily NewsDavid BianculliJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: [Parker] may be the best actress in all of television. Certainly, she's the most natural, and one of the most irresistibly lovable. [4 Aug 2005]
75
People WeeklyTom GliattoAug 3, 2012
Season 8 Review: This air of finality throws the many small, fine details of Parker's performance, the main reason for the show's existence, into sharp relief. [13 Aug 2012, p.42]
75
Season 2 Review: The best thing from Season 1 remains the same: Mary-Louise Parker. [21 Aug 2006, p.37]
75
Entertainment WeeklyMissy Schwartz
Season 4 Review: Ditching the tired suburban backdrop might prove to be just the creative shake-up Weeds needs after an overly wacked-out season 3. [20 June 2008, p.60]
70
San Jose Mercury News/Contra Costa TimesCharlie McCollumJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: 'Weeds' stumbles at times during its first few episodes. It makes some of its points with too little humor and subtlety. But for the most part, this is a nuanced comedy with interesting characters performed by a first-rate cast. [5 Aug 2005]
70
Seattle Post-IntelligencerMelanie McFarlandJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: It's a good show waiting to happen, television cliches and all. [5 Aug 2005]
60
Miami HeraldGlenn GarvinJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: Weeds may make you chuckle, but it wants you to gasp, and unless your name is June and you call your youngest son Beaver, it's not likely to happen. [7 Aug 2005]
60
VarietyBrian LowryJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: Interesting but not especially funny. [1 Aug 2005]
60
Chicago TribuneSid SmithJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: There's an uneven quality to the humor, and the snide putdown of "Leave It to Beaver"-land is starting to get old. [5 Aug 2005]
50
Denver PostJoanne OstrowJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: Darker than "Desperate Housewives," and even less nuanced. [11 Aug 2005]
50
Pittsburgh Post-GazetteRob OwenJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: "Weeds" tries unsuccessfully to balance a lot of stories that are too disparate in tone. [7 Aug 2005]
50
Newark Star-LedgerAlan SepinwallJul 11, 2013
Season 3 Review: It has so much going for it on paper -- notably Mary-Louise Parker as a pot-dealing soccer mom -- but the series' creators remain so pleased with themselves that they're rarely as funny as they obviously think they are. [13 Aug 2007]
50
Boston GlobeMatthew GilbertJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: Despite its unique premise, the show delivers little more than network sitcom material tarted up with cable raciness. [5 Aug 2005]
50
Season 6 Review: Season 6 staggers from incident to incident as Nancy and family run from their enemies--and the authorities. [13 Sep 2010, p.50]
40
Newark Star-LedgerAlan SepinwallJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: "Weeds" isn't nearly as shocking or hilarious as it clearly thinks it is. [5 Aug 2005]
25
Boston HeraldJul 11, 2013
Season 1 Review: Wouldn't be funny even if you were stoned. [7 Aug 2005]