Season #: 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
User Score
8.0

Generally favorable reviews- based on 777 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 83 out of 777
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Expand

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

  1. Mar 15, 2022
    8
    A solid and entertaining first season for Vikings, a genre that suprisingly has been largely ignored over the years.
    Plenty of promise to build on in the future.
  2. Jan 15, 2022
    10
    a única crítica que eu tenho é ter demorado para descobrir essa série e demorado majs ainda para asssitir pq é tudo galera
  3. Nov 19, 2021
    7
    A really solid foundation. Shows potential to what this show could become, and it definitely has enough personality of its own to stand as something else than just another Game of Thrones replacement.

    It has all the things you see in every single show nowadays. Sex, swearing, lots of yelling and swords and whatnot, but the show stands on its own with its gorgeous take on Norse
    A really solid foundation. Shows potential to what this show could become, and it definitely has enough personality of its own to stand as something else than just another Game of Thrones replacement.

    It has all the things you see in every single show nowadays. Sex, swearing, lots of yelling and swords and whatnot, but the show stands on its own with its gorgeous take on Norse mythology. All the hairstyles, all the beards, all the armor, FANTASTIC!

    The acting is mostly pretty good, if a bit forgettable. Travis Fimmel as Ragnar Lothbrok definitely looks the part and has some charisma to him, but he's mostly just quiet and stares at everyone for uncomfortable amounts of time with an awkward rap€ face. Also, every time Ragnar talks to his son Bjorn (or Björn whatever the **** ) he listens to what he has to say and then responds with "Hmph you sound like your mother" or "Hah you sound like your uncle, your father, aunt, sister" dude you sound ****ing stupid. Bjorn's character's pretty awful though, and so is the actor playing him. And so is Katheryn Winnick as Lagertha. She constantly looks annoyed or complains about something if she's not having sex with Ragnar. She even sacrifices a goat at one point. I guess it's a Norse mythology thing but that goat was innocent and cute. They should've sacrificed Lagertha instead, annoying dyke.

    All the other characters are pretty good though! Floki was a standout and worked excellently as a mysterious smaller side character with some charming goofiness to him. Ragnar's brother Rollo was also interesting and the little cliffhanger with him at the end of the season was great! Definitely interested to keep watching the show. The jarl, played by Gabriel Byrne was also good. Liked him a lot.

    The show also has a lot of great imagery and overall ideas for those who might not be that interested in the dialogue-heavy politics and character interactions, even though those are kinda the main thing. The king of Northumbria, Aelle, introduces a chilling snake pit which I thought was SO cool. I want to see how that's used later. There's also some boat scenes that were really interesting and claustrophobic. And also some gorgeous cinematography and shot ideas like a wave of blood water after a fight. It's all impressive and creative.

    But aside from the impressive fight scenes and cinematography, the show feels like wasted potential with the story. The story was ****ing boring. The sixth episode is probably the peak, with an interesting duel that kills off a character I would've really liked to see more of. Can't say I'm surprised since later on this show apparently kills off more interesting characters to be oh so unpredictable and coooool. C*nts. If you don't have more interesting characters to take over the story after a death, you're doing it wrong lmao. I need to read a summary of the story before I watch the second season, but it's mostly just characters going here or there to talk politics. Hey we want this land and we want you to fight with us and whatnot, and then someone betrays someone and they fight. With only nine episodes in the first season, there's a bit too much plot later on. Episodes 1-3 were pretty solid with the story but after that it just becomes a bit muddled in my opinion. The characters also start acting like dumbasses if the plot needs them to. It's not an absolute dealbreaker but it's noticeable.

    There's a lot of potential and I don't think this is trying to just copy GoT or anything else. It's its own thing and it's solid at it, but it's not like AMAAAAAZING tier. For that you'd need a good story. Still, worth a watch.
    Expand
  4. Jan 1, 2021
    7
    A great starter from a TV show that promises great things. Storytelling is a bit slow, but scenes, characters and evolution are top. Next seasons are promising.
  5. Jul 22, 2020
    9
    Clever, subtle, tongue in cheek humor. Think Game of Thrones/Vikings with a sense of humor. Excellent chatacter development and the plot lines are creative and move at the right pace.
  6. Mar 30, 2020
    7
    الجزء كان جيدا ولكن مصحوبا ببعض الملل ويفتقد للإثارة والتشويق ولم تكن أحداثه ذات مستوى عال
  7. Aug 9, 2019
    10
    Ragnar is my favourite character of all time. Travis Fimmel is so good as Ragnar. The story is really about Ragnar and his family. He is a simple Viking and a farmer. He want's to raid new lands with his brother Rollo and other Vikings. This is how the story starts out. You see him and how he's a family man. His wife Legetha and son Bjorn are great characters as well. Floki is a funnyRagnar is my favourite character of all time. Travis Fimmel is so good as Ragnar. The story is really about Ragnar and his family. He is a simple Viking and a farmer. He want's to raid new lands with his brother Rollo and other Vikings. This is how the story starts out. You see him and how he's a family man. His wife Legetha and son Bjorn are great characters as well. Floki is a funny character who I loved in this season. The acting is incredibly good by every actor. The writing is good. This is a must watch! 10/10 Expand
  8. Jan 16, 2019
    8
    A great historical ressambles of the viking time. The characters are great and so is the story. I didn't, however like the last 3 episodes because there didn't happen a lot. However they are a build-up for the second season, and therefore I can look over it.
  9. Jan 5, 2019
    8
    A great series with compelling characters and intense plot, the only letdown is the clearly limited budget for the bigger scenes
  10. Nov 24, 2018
    9
    It's awesome to see a show that respects historic aspects like rituals, religion disputes and politics on a ferocious level. Acting is done excellent, and this season doesn't drag out unnecessary by only doing 8 episodes instead of more. Very enjoyable to watch, immersive and intriguing.

    I give it a 9/10, it is an impressive first season for a show.
  11. Sep 11, 2018
    8
    Vikings has an informative sense and compromise with reality that Game of Thrones doesn't have.
  12. Apr 17, 2018
    9
    Th visuals are great. The music is perfect. The combat is very decent. Intrigue seems a bit obviuos, but it doesn't spoil the fun. The actors play really well. There are some issues with the history part, but it's not a documentary after all.

    After Season 4 I started to think that the series began to decline (all these chinese and arabian girls, drugs and other bull...t) but in Season 5
    Th visuals are great. The music is perfect. The combat is very decent. Intrigue seems a bit obviuos, but it doesn't spoil the fun. The actors play really well. There are some issues with the history part, but it's not a documentary after all.

    After Season 4 I started to think that the series began to decline (all these chinese and arabian girls, drugs and other bull...t) but in Season 5 they seem to regain the spirit.

    A must see for all viking-age fans.
    Expand
  13. Feb 3, 2018
    9
    The opening of Vikings was great. I love history and seeing it come to life with this show is amazing. I like the beautiful landscapes that they film in and the interesting characters. It is such an awesome show and I look forward to watching the next seasons.
  14. Jan 22, 2018
    7
    It starts well although hurried, it gets slow in episodes 5, 6 and 7 and ends with sufficient strength. I hope that what follows is better.
  15. Aug 21, 2017
    7
    History Channel started very well in the beautiful world of the TV series with "Vikings" - how is the first History Channel show, and is the first season - "Vikings" in the 5 firstly episodes, is a terrific series - even though from the 6 episode to the season finale, the dramatic series fell in yield, direction, script, and, began to get confused, like the development of Ragnar Lothbrok'sHistory Channel started very well in the beautiful world of the TV series with "Vikings" - how is the first History Channel show, and is the first season - "Vikings" in the 5 firstly episodes, is a terrific series - even though from the 6 episode to the season finale, the dramatic series fell in yield, direction, script, and, began to get confused, like the development of Ragnar Lothbrok's BROTHER. But the performance of Travis Fimmels as Ragnar Lothbrok and the perfomance of Katheryn Winnick as Lagertha Lothbrok, the great secundary characters (as Floki, Athelstan, and outhers), "Vikings" is very promising. Expand
  16. Jan 19, 2017
    10
    I've been sucked into the is series from season one. This season is literally killing it! I'm drawn to the family dynamics in a show and these relationships are so strong.
  17. Jan 11, 2017
    10
    I can not say enough good things about this show. Season 4 is awesome. Casting is great, writing is good, acting is good. I hope this show goes 10 seasons.
  18. Jan 6, 2017
    7
    Every episode is about sex.

    I'm not joking. I get tired of it. It's like they want to force you to become a sexoholic.

    The show is good but this one thing ruins it. It's like they try TOO HARD to force feed Sex and Feminism... It gets really old.
  19. Jan 2, 2017
    10
    Amongst top 10 for sure. Scenery is superb. Casting and acting couldn't be better. Character development and storyline keeps you glued. Look forward to many seasons.
  20. Jan 1, 2017
    9
    It's easy to know when you're hooked on a series, but as important are the attributes to the story that keep it so compelling that you will come back. From the plot lines, characters, landscape and battle scenes, Vikings grabs and keeps hold of your attention with great interest. I can't wait to keep watching it!
  21. Dec 12, 2016
    10
    I found a perfect balance of drama, history, non fiction and coolness. As a fan of shows like Game of Thrones, True Blood and WestWorld; it's been a good find. It's really good binge watching!
  22. Jun 28, 2016
    10
    Cool show - why do i need to use 150 characters? why do i need to use 150 characters? why do i need to use 150 characters? why do i need to use 150 characters? why do i need to use 150 characters? why do i need to use 150 characters? why do i need to use 150 characters? why do i need to use 150 characters? why do i need to use 150 characters? why do i need to use 150 characters?
  23. Mar 26, 2016
    10
    The story is as brutally simple (as were the Vikings, so the series suggests): Ragnar (Travis Fimmel), a farmer when he's not being a warrior,
    Brilliant series
  24. Mar 24, 2016
    7
    season 1-3 are exceptional. season 4 is slow and has alot of filler episodes. S04E06 actually skips a battle scene ffs. As usual , something that started great , is now being watered down to stretch content...wish writers would learn what the chase is and how to cut to it already. because of season 4 im taking my score from a 9 to a 7
  25. Wyv
    Jan 24, 2016
    9
    Not too slow, not too fast. Not too censored not too explicit. Very enjoyable narration and good actors. Easy to follow and nothing unnecessary is shown. It could be not very historically accurate but nothing tragic. In 2 words: RAW, and REAL. I am not an expert but guys, trust me, i think this is one of the best series you may find. At the public who prefers finery and fakery well.. goNot too slow, not too fast. Not too censored not too explicit. Very enjoyable narration and good actors. Easy to follow and nothing unnecessary is shown. It could be not very historically accurate but nothing tragic. In 2 words: RAW, and REAL. I am not an expert but guys, trust me, i think this is one of the best series you may find. At the public who prefers finery and fakery well.. go watch game of thrones. Expand
  26. Dec 1, 2015
    10
    The best show on TV!

    Honestly, it's brilliant. LOVE the characters, the progression, the plots, the acting, the scenery. It's the best show out there.
  27. Sep 26, 2015
    10
    Una delle migliori serie televisive mai viste, splendide ambientazioni, splendidi personaggi, grande Regia e narrazione autentica e onesta di quel mondo. Da vedere assolutamente.
  28. Jul 10, 2015
    9
    I burned through 3 seasons in one week. And it was definitely worth it. Irresistibly easy to watch and fall into. The characters are constantly evolving and becoming more and more real. While the story is getting more and more tense as you watch. Definitely recommend to people who like historical TV!
  29. Jul 7, 2015
    10
    Best TV show that I have ever seen. Great acting, great action and the landscapes are incredible! I recommend this show to everyone. Can't wait for more episodes!!
  30. Jun 6, 2015
    10
    This is a brilliant show. I was put off watching it a while ago because of the GOT lite tag I'd seen in some lazy review until a friend recommended it recently. Trust your friends! There's nothing lite about it. It's all story and action without the laborious and pretentious intrigue building of some other shows. Great acting and fascinating characters make it easy to watch.
Metascore
71

Generally favorable reviews - based on 20 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 17 out of 20
  2. Negative: 0 out of 20
  1. People Weekly
    Reviewed by: Tom Gliatto
    Mar 7, 2013
    75
    History's first scripted series is a headlong tumble into an irresistible and surprisingly neglected genre. [18 Mar 2013, p.41]
  2. Reviewed by: Glenn Garvin
    Mar 4, 2013
    50
    Vikings is at least fun to watch, in a sword-swinging, head-chopping, maiden-despoiling sort of way.
  3. 70
    Hirst cleverly weaves a mystical element into the plot, which pays off with each episode. And he throws in plenty of battle scenes to please bloodthirsty fans.