True Detective

:

Season 2
  • Network: HBO
  • Series Premiere Date: Jan 12, 2014
Season #: 4, 3, 2, 1
User Score
6.4

Generally favorable reviews- based on 837 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 479 out of 837
  2. Mixed: 192 out of 837
  3. Negative: 166 out of 837
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Buy on
Stream On

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

view
per page
  1. logic
    Jul 9, 2015
    8
    I don't understand the bad reviews. We're really enjoying it. The dialog is a little forced but the characters and slick production are worth it. Yep, we loved season 1 and so far season 2 isn't as good, but after 3 episodes this show has been very entertaining.
  2. Justin765
    Jun 21, 2015
    8
    Although not as instantaneously additive or thought provoking as the first season's premiere, "The Western Book of the Dead" still serves as a intriguing start point to what looks like a promising season forthcoming.
  3. 123456
    Jul 1, 2015
    6
    Episode 2 of Season Two, and the unexpected final scene suggests this season may have something interesting to say. Episode one was packed with content but failed to entertain in any meaningful way, lacking drama, tension or charm, and spending so long skirting around the plot (especially compared to Season 1) that it was a relief to finally get somewhere, but again this only happened inEpisode 2 of Season Two, and the unexpected final scene suggests this season may have something interesting to say. Episode one was packed with content but failed to entertain in any meaningful way, lacking drama, tension or charm, and spending so long skirting around the plot (especially compared to Season 1) that it was a relief to finally get somewhere, but again this only happened in the final scene.

    I can understand how the show would be wary of repeating itself after its success, but it seems to have thrown away so much that made it great and replaced it with twice as many protagonists and conversations that go on too long.    … Expand
  4. OpinionatedGuy
    Aug 11, 2015
    8
    While this season’s case plot arc is too convoluted, the second season of True Detective is somehow enjoyable to watch on its own without being compared to the first season with thought-provoking themes, well-executed character plot arcs and stellar performances from Colin Farrell and Rachel McAdams.

    Rating: 7.5/10 Pros: +There were a lot of thought-provoking themes this season. One    While this season’s case plot arc is too convoluted, the second season of True Detective is somehow enjoyable to watch on its own without being compared to the first season with thought-provoking themes, well-executed character plot arcs and stellar performances from Colin Farrell and Rachel McAdams.

    Rating: 7.5/10

    Pros:
    +There were a lot of thought-provoking themes this season. One particular theme I liked was Woodrugh’s plot arc that revolves seeing his homosexuality as a weakness and a shameful trait.
    +The character plot arcs are well-executed.
    +Colin Farrell’s and Rachel McAdams’ performances are stellar. It would be a huge snub if they’re not nominated for an Emmy next year.
    +I thought the season finale was actually satisfying.

    Neutral:
    .Vince Vaughn’s performance takes a lot of time to grow on. I am not impressed by his acting until the penultimate episode. Although I am am somehow impressed now, it took that long to make me change my opinion about someone’s acting so I can’t say it’s a good thing nor it’s a bad thing.
    .Season 2 of True Detective is no Season 1. But it’s still somehow enjoyable on its own.

    Cons:
    -The case plot arc is too convoluted to understand.
    -The change of setting to a bigger city is the reason why this season doesn’t feel special for me. The first season’s setting in which is set on a more isolated setting is one of the things that made me love about the first season.    … Expand
  5. Yas667
    Jul 2, 2015
    5
    I am not giving this a 5 in comparison to the first season which was ground breaking. After watching the first 2 episodes; the series is very very underwhelming. The characters and portrayal is mediocre to say the least. I dont mind a slow show however the worst problem is the story set in a similar pace is not half as engaging. Disappointed!
  6. Joe15
    Jul 24, 2015
    10
    Great second season. Great actors,writers,characters and story. Fast paced, suspenseful drama with depth. Enjoying it fully and can't wait to see what's coming next.

    For the naysayers, go back to watching The Bachelor or Under The Dome; it appears to be more your pace guys.
  7. Bagga
    Aug 4, 2015
    9
    Season 2 is fantastic.

    With an extremely complex plot and A LOT of characters, season 2 has been getting alot more criticisms than season 1. I think this is because this season is not made to be watched once a week; its either a binge watch show or a show that you need to re-watch. The plot is amazing, but extremely complex so if you view it one a week most of the small details, that    Season 2 is fantastic.

    With an extremely complex plot and A LOT of characters, season 2 has been getting alot more criticisms than season 1. I think this is because this season is not made to be watched once a week; its either a binge watch show or a show that you need to re-watch. The plot is amazing, but extremely complex so if you view it one a week most of the small details, that end up really important, are lost on you.

    In short; the characters are great, the story is great, the cinematography is beautiful but the dialog is a little off sometimes and the pacing could be better. Still, fantastic season.    … Expand
  8. LatinCritic13
    Mar 29, 2016
    8
    After the second season of True Detective ended it ended out okay but not as good compared to the previous season. However, I liked the second season of this show but there are negative things that I didn't like about this season when the show ended like that. And also I like to debunk this review in a pros and cons points to see what are the good things or bad things about this season..After the second season of True Detective ended it ended out okay but not as good compared to the previous season. However, I liked the second season of this show but there are negative things that I didn't like about this season when the show ended like that. And also I like to debunk this review in a pros and cons points to see what are the good things or bad things about this season..

    PROS:
    + Colin Farrell, Rachel McAdams, Taylor Kitsch, Kelly Reilly, and Vince Vaughn's performances
    + T-Bone Burnett's haunting score
    + Excellent soundtrack choices that lighten up the tone for this season
    + The last four episodes spice's things up
    + That orgy infiltration party scene
    + Physical action and shootouts scenes

    CONS:
    - Too much stories on other main characters makes this season confusing to watch
    - There are awkward moments in writing that affects the actor's performances
    - All these stories together should've extend about 4 more episodes instead of 8
    - Too many directors directing different episodes which makes the first half of this season so confusing to watch
    - The ending of this season was disappointing with no happy ending compared to the previous god-like season
    FINAL NOTE: This latest installment of True Detective is good still but not that satisfying enough to entertain the audience that came from the last season like me. However, I still love True Detective no matter what but it is better that Nic Pizzolatto to take his time really slowly. Because I noticed that this show feels rushed when the first season started out very steadily. Word an advice Nic, take your time if you want to put a lot of things in your show why not just extend it about 2 or 4 episodes for once and look for a better director next time instead of you having to get all directors direct different episode at once.
    VERDICT: 8/10    … Expand
  9. Shimmyan
    Jun 22, 2015
    8
    Pretty solid from the very start, a lot of information to assimilate in the first episode, a lot of talk and character stories, the pace is different compared to the first season, but I avoid as much a I can to think about Season 1 while watching Season 2. Rust and Marty and the actors performing aren't coming back, we have to get over it to enjoy this new season. It will be impossible toPretty solid from the very start, a lot of information to assimilate in the first episode, a lot of talk and character stories, the pace is different compared to the first season, but I avoid as much a I can to think about Season 1 while watching Season 2. Rust and Marty and the actors performing aren't coming back, we have to get over it to enjoy this new season. It will be impossible to match last season's quality.

    The plot is more of a mainstream crime story this time like we are more used to (mob, cops, deal going wrong implicating everyone), just hoping it won't get too mainstream and please don't make Rachel McAdams's character an invention to please that yapping feminist audience.

    I found the writing and character play quite convincing for now, even though the protagonists seem to have an overly dramatic background, maybe to compensate on the lack of darkness we have this time. I just hope it won't go too much on the self-pity pathos, yet it is going to be hard to fit four in depth character stories in 8 episodes.

    It is still too early to judge, yet it has been confirmed that the story picks up pretty fast after the couple of first episodes.

    How official press critic reviewers manage to give this a 62 after seeing three or four episodes, while promoting recent examples of garbage writing and acting like GoT Season 5 and the entire Walking Dead series with 80s and 90s is BEYOND ME.    … Expand
  10. Ariel90
    Jun 21, 2015
    9
    (Based on episode 1) An almost perfect set up episode, Colin Farrel was excellent, but this season can't be that slow, we need some action in the next few episodes.
  11. cocofounder
    Jul 20, 2015
    9
    People are so quick to judge. Let's not forgot that season 1 took some time to develop too. I have to admit, episode's 1 and most of 2 had me almost falling asleep. But from the shotgun to the chest at the end of episode 2 to now the season woke up, all characters being properly developed now and let's just say if you've seen episode 4 and still think this season sucks then there's noPeople are so quick to judge. Let's not forgot that season 1 took some time to develop too. I have to admit, episode's 1 and most of 2 had me almost falling asleep. But from the shotgun to the chest at the end of episode 2 to now the season woke up, all characters being properly developed now and let's just say if you've seen episode 4 and still think this season sucks then there's no convincing anyway… Expand
  12. Prophatsee
    Jul 20, 2015
    10
    I don't get all the hate or people saying they don't get it. I'm loving it and especially at the end of 4 and 5 can't wait to see how it ends. I don't know if people are comparing it to season 1 when it shouldnt. It's a whole new show new story new characters only the title name is the same. It doesn't have the chase a serial killer scenario like season 1 but it has political corruptionI don't get all the hate or people saying they don't get it. I'm loving it and especially at the end of 4 and 5 can't wait to see how it ends. I don't know if people are comparing it to season 1 when it shouldnt. It's a whole new show new story new characters only the title name is the same. It doesn't have the chase a serial killer scenario like season 1 but it has political corruption and cover up murder. I'm glad it's not going the serial killer route again seeing as that has been overplayed for years. If you like LA No ire James Ellroy novels or the Chinatown movie this is for you. Don't listen to the haters judge it yourself if you don't like it cool. This isnt a show where you can stare at your phone while watching it. Its like a book. Got to put phone down for an hour and don't expect anything every scene just listen and watch what's happening and enjoy as the tension builds up till it gets to a boiling point like it did in episode 5. It's that point in the book where you stay up late binge reading cause you have to see what happens in the end… Expand
  13. gabal61
    Jul 26, 2015
    10
    I won't be so insulting to say that if you don't like this you're stupid. It is just that you need to know it is not a regular TV show, more of a novel. It is slow, noir, hopeless and sometimes, yes, annoying. If each episode is a chapter, I am enough interested to discover the next one. If you want hectic, saturated story and images à la CSI, you are at the wrong place. From a TV show onI won't be so insulting to say that if you don't like this you're stupid. It is just that you need to know it is not a regular TV show, more of a novel. It is slow, noir, hopeless and sometimes, yes, annoying. If each episode is a chapter, I am enough interested to discover the next one. If you want hectic, saturated story and images à la CSI, you are at the wrong place. From a TV show on HBO I am expecting: good story, good artistic direction, good soundtrack, good sound/image/feel; it's all there. But the most outstanding aspect is the acting. Flawless all around acting. I did not know McAdams, just that it was against her usual character, nor Kitsch and I became a believer. Vaughn, Farrell and Reilly are all convincing. Supporting actresses and actors alike are excellent, like Coster, Spencer or Davidovich. I am sadden by the poor review. Imagine it gave the idea to HBO to not do that kind of shows, who would?… Expand
  14. gustavohst
    Jul 28, 2015
    10
    Ótimas atuações, belo cenário, seriado que vem evoluindo bem, espero me surpreender!

    Elementos mais simplistas que também vem a acrescer com a qualidade é abertura.
  15. Pinkman_94
    Jun 21, 2015
    8
    It started slow,but I think it will improve,it was pretty similar to former season's first episode.I like very much Farrel's performance,the best for me so far.Mc Adams and Kitsch were good,I hope they get better through next episodes.A good start for one of my favorite Tv Shows
  16. Nikola
    Jun 23, 2015
    8
    I watch pilot.
    In first 20 mins, were pretty confused and messed .
    but as the episode is nearing the end of an impression on the TV series grew better and better.
  17. Vaxkang
    Jul 22, 2015
    10
    This show has excellent acting and story, the low scores it may get is because of the short attention spans of some the users here. Each episode is building tension, the story is solid. Too bad people tend to get sketchy when the plot is mildly complicated. Great season so far.
  18. JamesL
    Jul 25, 2015
    8
    Critics be damned. I am enjoying the second season. I agree it does not match the first but that was going to be impossible. I like the doom and gloom. I like the misery, the drug and alcohol abuse. I think Vaughn's comedies are horrible so it is great to see him in this roll. GOT really missed it this year but this has my attention. Sometimes the critics just do not know when to enjoy.
  19. FeministWomb
    Jul 18, 2015
    10
    True Detective S2 is a slow burn, an intellectual, not easy to read or consume, intimate yet repulsive look at the lives of three police officers who are on the edge of death or redemption. The cinematography is an empirical delight, the haunting scenes put you there. The diction and subtly of the script and character arcs means it requires sophisticated viewing...which is why its likelyTrue Detective S2 is a slow burn, an intellectual, not easy to read or consume, intimate yet repulsive look at the lives of three police officers who are on the edge of death or redemption. The cinematography is an empirical delight, the haunting scenes put you there. The diction and subtly of the script and character arcs means it requires sophisticated viewing...which is why its likely so many folks don't like this season as much. They don't get . My recommendation: watch ea. episode 3 times. Brilliant casting...this gives Farrell a second life, his vulnerability and intuition are uncanny as a seventies style burn out copper. McAdams owns her role, mother hen, sexual dominatrix and action s/hero all rolled into one. Vaughn is the strangest, yet most intriguing bad guy since Tony Soprano. We want to both laugh and cry at him, and we are horrified too. The real time feel to the action is very avant garde as mainstream TV goes. Again, this one burns slow...but its red hot.… Expand
  20. CineSuppa
    Aug 3, 2015
    9
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. While I can understand early confusion regarding the second season of True Detective, I think most are missing what's going on. If you think the first season was dark, you're in for a surprise. We often look at the most barbaric acts as something done by the uneducated, the misfortunate, the sick, the poor. Season 2 is rocking the commonplace conception that civilization is civilized. And doing it in an extremely timely and interesting way. This is where I'm hoping the core of the story isn't lost on the masses.

    There's a long history of socio-political analogy in "The Wizard of Oz", and this is exactly what we have here: a modern interpretation. Ani is Dorothy, Ray is the Tin Man, Paul is the Cowardly Lion and Frank is the Scarecrow. The masses are Munchkins, obliviously carrying on their hard-working lives as long as the status quo is kept intact. But it's not.

    Ani came from humble and virginal beginnings, but the good daughter fairytale is long dead. While Dorothy was a character pure of heart and mind, Ani is the everywoman who's been forced down the darkest of dark paths. Her childhood rape shaped her entire existence, and she's long prepared for a worst-case scenario of retribution, something she's now had a taste of.

    Ray is a man in a hard metal exterior, hardened then rusted by his experiences. When he couldn't be there for his wife in need, his anger grew and he sought revenge. Now he's learning he made mistakes, and through social lubrication (particularly with Ani), he's able to be a functional adult again. But he still lives in the shadow of knowing he can rust solid, never to be repaired. This is partially evident in his substance abuse. Avoiding reality.

    Paul has every decoration of a hunter and is the personification of bravery. The king of the jungle. His war record and his duties as an officer of the law are the cornerstone of who he is. But he has secrets. Ones that scare him. Ones that ultimately are his downfall because his cowardice eats him. For all his training and resolve, his incomparable truth is his weakness. Homosexuality is literally a thorn in his paw.

    The three of them are normal people who society has changed. Gone are the G-rated tropes of yesteryear, and the plight of the common man. Each embodies our worst unspoken sexual fears. You could even make the analogy the source material made: hard working common people from various walks of life coming together in similar misfortune.

    And Frank. Oh Frank. He's the Scarecrow. The straw man. The original analogy was the farm workers of America, but Frank takes it much further. He has no clue of his roots. He was an orphan. He built himself up, stuffed his own shirt with golden straw, and filled himself out as a man. But straw burns, and he's been burned and left for dead by flying monkeys (various henchmen). The fire analogy is even stronger by him burning his properties to the ground in retaliation.

    They all started on slightly different paths, but now converge around something they all have mutual interest in. And where The Wizard of Oz skips over the darkest parts of their journey, this miniseries delves into the depths for each of them. Each has or will be confronted by the cornerstone of their fears. They'll all be challenged in their own pit of hellfire and brimstone.

    While we don't have the antagonist to point a finger at yet, we know exactly who it is. It's an allegory. The villain is those who make the decisions for all of us, those who write the law but are above it. The villain is corruption. It's the modern mafia, and how they've moved into legitimate business delving deeper into unfathomable corruption. We might not know their names or faces, but they tug at the strings of reality like we're all starting to be familiar with in the real world. The land and rail deal of Season 2 is a microcosm, an intimate biopsy into a larger cancer, insinuating the multi-headed beast lurking in the shadows in a way that hasn't been done since Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut. We know it's there.

    These four characters are wondering through the dark part of the forest. They're all on a quest to get the Wizard from different sides of the law... but nobody gets to see the Wizard.

    I can't wait to see the finale.    … Expand
  21. jayman69
    Jun 24, 2015
    9
    Wow without having seen season 1 I checked out the first episode of season 2 I loved the eerieness to it and the nods to Stanley Kubrick and David Lynch through the film with its wide shot and aerial shots the performances are amazing and intrigues me to watch more I loved the music and some people reviewed that they hated it but I thought it fit well I look forward to watching more ofWow without having seen season 1 I checked out the first episode of season 2 I loved the eerieness to it and the nods to Stanley Kubrick and David Lynch through the film with its wide shot and aerial shots the performances are amazing and intrigues me to watch more I loved the music and some people reviewed that they hated it but I thought it fit well I look forward to watching more of this and seeing the characters develop and what their motivations are. I've been wanting to see season one so I can't compare it but I love this so far… Expand
  22. jeef1523
    Aug 26, 2015
    8
    True Detective's Season 2 enters a new approach to the mystery world. Intriguing, complex, confusing and dark - an essential Noire from the core - elements that when put together make a very good mystery thriller.

    The mood of the series is set straightforward once again showing problematic and powerful characters, in fact, never have I seen Colin Farrel show so much depth in his    True Detective's Season 2 enters a new approach to the mystery world. Intriguing, complex, confusing and dark - an essential Noire from the core - elements that when put together make a very good mystery thriller.

    The mood of the series is set straightforward once again showing problematic and powerful characters, in fact, never have I seen Colin Farrel show so much depth in his sorrows, neither Vince Vaughn play an extremely powerful role. The case, also, very branching, and more confusing, than the first season's - it's not a downside, but one that could have been better played, showing for example a more elaborated crime or more intriguing villain. Nevertheless it's pace and characters make another very intriguing story.

    The pace of the show is brilliant, Nic Pizzolato showing once again how involving his stories can be, it's slow but carefully driven, as much that you're never bored or too confused, you are at many times, on the edge of your seat or feeling the palpable tension the actors bring to life. And the story's drama doesn't end there, since it's very dark and deep, the environment itself carries pessimism all around the developing, and it makes it far more compelling for you to watch.

    There are a couple of downsides though, as the story itself doesn't feel as dense as it should be, a tone that's brought by the dark setting and should be filled, and the characters don't combine as well in some scenes. Still it's a masterpiece in directing, bringing the best out of the actors, coordinating perfect scenes, along with one of the best action shootouts ever (again), leading to a great conclusion.

    It is not as perfectly fit as the first season, but it is one top drama season filled with great actings and some horrifyingly great and tense scenes.

    8.7/10    … Expand
  23. harmattan
    Aug 18, 2015
    7
    First off, TD Season 2 is no where near as bad as critics and rabid fans of the 1st season have made out. On the contrary, it's an entirely watchable, hard-boiled detective/cop drama with some rough edges. It is largely a victim from "2nd child" syndrome where people are expecting something groundbreaking and extraordinary. From the get-go, the shows creators stated each season would beFirst off, TD Season 2 is no where near as bad as critics and rabid fans of the 1st season have made out. On the contrary, it's an entirely watchable, hard-boiled detective/cop drama with some rough edges. It is largely a victim from "2nd child" syndrome where people are expecting something groundbreaking and extraordinary. From the get-go, the shows creators stated each season would be entirely different from many perspectives, so I don't know what people were expecting.

    The plot is and atmosphere is, in a word, bleak. Something that is not necessarily bad, but in the case of TD 2, it seems a bit forced and overbearing. Further, the dialogue suffers from being too un-naturalistic in many cases. That said, the pacing is relatively well done, the acting very well handled (in some cases terrific, especially considering the material), and the story is interesting. Overall, I enjoyed it.    … Expand
  24. Skulb
    Aug 29, 2015
    9
    While still very good, the second season of TD suffers from a slightly busy cast, which makes keeping track of names a bit of an issue at times. By the time the main character´s boss reappeared as one of the lead villains in the last two episodes I had forgotten his name a long time ago and almost that the actor was in the series at all. Despite this slight confusion the narrative isWhile still very good, the second season of TD suffers from a slightly busy cast, which makes keeping track of names a bit of an issue at times. By the time the main character´s boss reappeared as one of the lead villains in the last two episodes I had forgotten his name a long time ago and almost that the actor was in the series at all. Despite this slight confusion the narrative is compelling for all its darkness, the characters well written and acted once again and the atmosphere excellent. Perhaps not quite as good as in S1 but not that far off either.
    The dialogue might be slightly corny now and then and a few plot elements don´t make immediate sense, But this might be more to do with the understated nature of this show than anything else. TD routinely avoided explaining things to the viewers in S1 and that trend certainly continues. I do however feel that it this time serves less as an intriguing demand on the viewers than as an attempt to paper over inconsistencies in the script and cheaply close out plot lines
    For all of that TD certainly has a lot more merit than most TV shows. Dark, degraded and pretentious it may be, but it does those things extremely well. Can´t ask much more of a TV show can we?    … Expand
  25. StrongHarm
    Mar 25, 2018
    0
    Season1 had some great actors and a really engaging storyline. It was so disturbing in parts I regret that I can't unsee it. Season2 had really great actors and an engaging storyline. It was so depressing that after it was over I seriously contemplated watching only educational programming for the rest of my life (no exaggeration). While True Detective is one of the best shows I've everSeason1 had some great actors and a really engaging storyline. It was so disturbing in parts I regret that I can't unsee it. Season2 had really great actors and an engaging storyline. It was so depressing that after it was over I seriously contemplated watching only educational programming for the rest of my life (no exaggeration). While True Detective is one of the best shows I've ever watched, it's also the worst. With great writing and great actors, why did they have to add over the top disturbing and depressing turns? That's not "edgy", that's ruining something that could have been great. Art is supposed to evoke emotion and passion, but there's a point in which it can cross the line and become corrupt.… Expand
  26. Mike_M
    Apr 15, 2016
    1
    Now, if you're really smart, you can use what you learned from season 2 being terrible to go back and watch season 1 and understand that it was also well-made, well-acted, well-shot garbage storytelling.
  27. LighterThings
    Aug 8, 2015
    8
    While season two may not be able to live up the incredibly high standards set by it's predecessor, there's no denying that the show has me glued to the screen every Sunday night. Nic Pizzolatto has proven himself to be one of the most talented writers working in television right now, as each episode is a testament to the complex story he has woven over these eight weeks.

    Like The Wire    While season two may not be able to live up the incredibly high standards set by it's predecessor, there's no denying that the show has me glued to the screen every Sunday night. Nic Pizzolatto has proven himself to be one of the most talented writers working in television right now, as each episode is a testament to the complex story he has woven over these eight weeks.

    Like The Wire before it, the reason True Detective works so well is because the show starts fresh with each season, quickly evolving into this web of intricate story lines following broken people on the verge of foundering as they descend into the darkest parts of mankind's depravity. While some fans may be missing that "Silence of the Lambs" vibe from season one, season two is something of an homage to some of the best crime dramas of the last twenty years, namely "Heat" and "The Departed."

    The show may have lost a few stragglers after the shift to a new cast and new plot, but I have loved every minute of this season as much as I enjoyed the first, and I cannot wait to see what's in store for us in tomorrow's season finale. Personally, I like the idea of an ever-changing cast and story; it allows Pizzolatto and crew to explore new locations and plots with some of the best actors of our generation, so even though we'll be saying goodbye to Velcoro, Bezzerides, and Woodrugh -- like we did Cohle and Hart -- there's always next season to look forward to.    … Expand
  28. JJFoshay
    Aug 10, 2015
    8
    I think this season is actually a considerable improvement over the last. Whereas the last went for vague, flowery philosophy and pseudo-complexity, this season is a hyper-realistic depiction of systemic corruption with an extremely intricate plot that favors multiple viewings, discussion, and detective work by viewers. The performances are strong, sometimes considerably so, and whileI think this season is actually a considerable improvement over the last. Whereas the last went for vague, flowery philosophy and pseudo-complexity, this season is a hyper-realistic depiction of systemic corruption with an extremely intricate plot that favors multiple viewings, discussion, and detective work by viewers. The performances are strong, sometimes considerably so, and while the writing bears the creator's trademark heavy handed philosophical dialogue, the relationships between characters and rich and feel authentic. The first few episodes were somewhat slow, but reveal themselves as full of crucial clues once the series wraps up. The action sequences are thrilling and well produced. The ending is a bittersweet and multi-layered answer to last year's tidy conclusion of the good guys winning - that conclusion is difficult to draw after the view this season takes on the prevalence of urban nihilism, hedonism, and self-serving corruption reinforced by guiltless violence. True detectives make sacrifices and possess flaws that hinder their fight for a better world.… Expand
  29. alexnexus
    Aug 9, 2015
    7
    Well... I just saw True Detective S2 E8 -final episode- and I have to say that it never lived up to what the first season achieved. Nevertheless, the miserable, beat up and more-human-than-human characters where worth the trip. Yes: sometimes their romantic dialogs -cuasimonologues- where a little bit to much, but it was part of what made the first season unique and what made a lot of fansWell... I just saw True Detective S2 E8 -final episode- and I have to say that it never lived up to what the first season achieved. Nevertheless, the miserable, beat up and more-human-than-human characters where worth the trip. Yes: sometimes their romantic dialogs -cuasimonologues- where a little bit to much, but it was part of what made the first season unique and what made a lot of fans come back one more time. The best of season two would have to be Rachel McAdams herself playing a central character (Ani Bezzerides) many would say hovers out of her acting comfort zone. In second place the series' music especially Lera Lynn's melancholic voice and lyrics. I do want to see a third season and probably a forth season. Let's see what's next. Cheers!… Expand
  30. millenbop
    Aug 10, 2015
    4
    Season 1 pretty much had it all. Season 2 pretty much only had McAdams .

    The story is, to me, not that interesting, and I really didn't care how it would end. This is the biggest problem with s2, it's not compelling. Also, too many side stories that didn't add anything at all other than more things to keep in your head, as you never know what's important or not. Most of the actors    Season 1 pretty much had it all. Season 2 pretty much only had McAdams .

    The story is, to me, not that interesting, and I really didn't care how it would end. This is the biggest problem with s2, it's not compelling. Also, too many side stories that didn't add anything at all other than more things to keep in your head, as you never know what's important or not.

    Most of the actors were not believable, Vince Vaughn should stick to B movies.

    George said it best: "it's a show about nothing".    … Expand
  31. hemla
    Aug 11, 2015
    10
    I have to say i love it even more than the first season. I was hoping they would do something different then the first season which would be still as good and they completely delivered. I love the acting, love the tension and love the storytelling. I can see why somebody would dislike it for its complexity and sometimes hard to follow progression but i have to say, i am in love.
  32. martincm1910
    Jul 24, 2016
    10
    This is probably one of the most underrated season in the history of seasons. The plot of this one is beyond this world. Incredible performances (Rachel McAdams, Taylor Kitsch, Vince Vaughn, Colin Farrell, Kelly Reilly) and the history develops pretty well.
  33. Prech
    Aug 4, 2015
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Абсолютно несправедливая оценка дается этому сезону. Сезон отличный, закрученный и сложный сюжет, в отличии от первого сезона. Первый сезон был очень глупым по сравнению с этим, даже убийцей оказался гребаный садовник, ну это же смешно. Его тянула только стилистика, вообщем не понимаю откуда столько негатива.… Expand
  34. BantHoon
    Aug 10, 2015
    8
    The problem with many cinema and television critics today is that it’s increasingly difficult for them to look outside of their boxes. Many (most?) of them feel that if a story isn’t constructed to their liking or doesn’t follow a path they appreciate, it is inherently flawed. Most of these critics no longer try to figure out what a writer and/or director is TRYING to do; instead, theyThe problem with many cinema and television critics today is that it’s increasingly difficult for them to look outside of their boxes. Many (most?) of them feel that if a story isn’t constructed to their liking or doesn’t follow a path they appreciate, it is inherently flawed. Most of these critics no longer try to figure out what a writer and/or director is TRYING to do; instead, they apparently want the writer and/or director to do the things and follow the forms that make them comfortable. (Gertrude Stein would be appalled!) For example, critics, professional and novice, are claiming that it was obvious Ray and Frank were going to meet their demise by cues early in the episode. Of course! This is obviously intentional on Pizzolatto’s part. Viewers are SUPPOSED to realize this and see the end coming for the characters, which brings about a sort of pathos and sympathy that makes the rest of the story compelling. In any case, don’t we all know that Ray and Frank aren’t going to be alive in the end from the very first episode? Killers and criminals rarely make it out of crime series alive. One critic complained that the gun fight after which Frank and Ray make off with millions isn’t very suspenseful. First, it isn’t a “shootout”; Frank and Ray are doing all of the shooting. Second, why does the critic believe it must be suspenseful? This is not intended to be a suspensefully thrilling scene, rather a scene solidifying what we already know about Frank and Ray: that although they have certain variations of integrity, they are–and always will be–brutal individuals at heart.
    True Detective Season 2 was good, not as compelling as Season 1, but still a very good series. The problem, it seems to me, is that movie and television viewers today–like the critics–are snarky and self-entitled to the degree that if a program isn’t what they hoped it would be, they react virulently negatively, as if a show that isn’t designed the way they think it should be designed is a personal affront to them.
    It is absolutely true that a few things about Season 2 are problematic. One, there are too many disparate plots and storylines, some of them hardly pertinent to the primary plot. (One can make a good argument that Kitsch’s character isn’t necessary–what does it really add to the story?) Along with this, there simply are too many characters. With so many characters integral to–and not really integral to–the story, there is very little time to develop many of them sufficiently. This, and the sometimes convoluted plots and not-altogether-necessary subplots, makes the story difficult to follow at times. And, of course, Vince Vaughn is ill-suited for his role. I have always respected Vaughn, and still do, but this is evidence that there are some character types he isn’t fit to play. In addition, I don’t think Kitsch is great. That being said, there are a lot of GOOD things about Season 2:
    1. The season finale offers a far better ending than that of the Season 1 finale, which was incredibly disappointing. (The entire Season 1 was set in motion by a lunatic backwoods hick? That’s it?) It ended like every suspense/mystery/horror story: good guys finally track down insane killer under heavy peril, are injured in the task, and survive. It cheapened the entire Season 1 series. Conversely, there is a lot of soul and humanity in the Season 2 finale. Much more original and emotionally engaging. Ray seeing his son for the final time, his final voice message never connecting with his son, he and Ani’s final phone conversation, Frank’s hallucinations during his final moments–these are all truly touching and well written.
    2. Though Vaughn misplays his part and Kitsch’s performance isn’t stellar, I think Ferell’s performance is every bit as good as Harrelson’s and McCaughnehey’s. McAdams is really strong too. In addition, the supporting cast is stellar. I think Season 2 has caught way too much flack for poor acting. While one or two performances are dubious (one in particular worse than that), as a whole Season 2 is remarkably well acted.
    3. Of course, one of the main gripes about season 2 is the difficult storyline, and I concede this complaint is warranted. However, it is only because Pizzolatto aims so high. And I think he should be credited for that. Yes, I think he bites off more than he could chew, but I give him credit for his creative attempt. It’s a really intricate story, whereas Season 1 is just… people are being killed, and come to find out it’s an insane hillbilly. Season 1 was great because of its protagonist characterizations. Season 2, of course, also relies on characterization; the problem is there are four main characters (and important secondary ones), which is simply difficult to pull off in a relatively small number of one-hour episodes, and as I’ve suggested, the entire Paul characterization ends up being irrelevant to the story. But, still, I give credit to Pizzolatto for aiming high. In intention, effort, and design, I thi    … Expand
  35. pjslowboy
    Aug 10, 2015
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I'm not really sure what to say. The beginning was slow, just as the first season, but it really started getting good at episode 6. The ending was going good, but I thought it almost seemed like they were trying too much to be like a "Breaking Bad" ending. I don't know if anyone else thought this, but I really liked the actors in this season including the non-famous actors in it. The ending was a bit disappointing, but I really liked Rachel McAdams and Colin Farrel. But I was very surprised how much I like in the end how good Vince Vaughn was. But maybe it's me, but his demise seemed a lot "Breaking Bad" ish. Nevertheless, the acting was good, but I didn't really like every one of the actors low raspy talk throughout the whole series that seemed to imitate Mathew McConaghey's character in the first season. At least Woody Harrelson was unique and at the time so was McConaghey's. In this episode everyone is trying to be him. Loved the acting though so I'm gonna be kind and say it's right in the middle on rating. It kept me intrigued and I had to see the end. It's just the end was somewhat (or very) disappointing and as far as I'm concerned on the writers. Hope this helps and sorry for the misspellings of the names.… Expand
  36. Sundance69
    Aug 19, 2015
    10
    You have to love all of these so called "critics". If the job of making such a successful series was so easy, all of these experts would be Hollywood moguls. I will be the first one to admit that the first couple of episodes were a little disappointing, maybe I was not done with the greatness of the first season and I was expecting for this season to be as awesome. As soon as I cleared myYou have to love all of these so called "critics". If the job of making such a successful series was so easy, all of these experts would be Hollywood moguls. I will be the first one to admit that the first couple of episodes were a little disappointing, maybe I was not done with the greatness of the first season and I was expecting for this season to be as awesome. As soon as I cleared my head from that, I really understood and liked what this season had to offer. A different set up, totally different plot, great performances and gritty background of Cali and let me not forget that off the charts mournful music make this an incredibly good second season. People should appreciate and enjoy what a masterpiece this season was, common, a lot of people expected that all the protagonists would survive and live happily ever after. This was great of the charts entertainment and can't wait for season three to arrive. This is, if because of all the bad reviews HBO decides not to comeback with another. People, compare this anthology to the kind of entertainment we see on TV. I can't find anything better.… Expand
  37. hazmaz
    Oct 5, 2015
    10
    I loved the second season! And only reviewing because I want a third! If not for Rust being one of the best tv characters ever in the first season, I think I would have liked the second more. Vince Vaungh took some getting used too, but ended up being great!
  38. sehecman
    May 26, 2016
    1
    Undeniably television's greatest letdown of 2015. Both characters and plot are boring and incapable of evoking any sort of emotion. Colin Farrell's character is too **** to be likable, and not **** enough to be interesting. Vince Vaughn gets awkwardly two-dimensional. Taylor Kitsch never even develops. Only Rachel McAdams avoids being a complete disaster, and her character is a walkingUndeniably television's greatest letdown of 2015. Both characters and plot are boring and incapable of evoking any sort of emotion. Colin Farrell's character is too **** to be likable, and not **** enough to be interesting. Vince Vaughn gets awkwardly two-dimensional. Taylor Kitsch never even develops. Only Rachel McAdams avoids being a complete disaster, and her character is a walking cliche. Furthermore the writing is dreadful; the characters don't seem to care about solving this murder, so why should we? To think that this drivel comes from the same series that gave us one of TV's greatest seasons ever is just downright depressing.… Expand
  39. Luhter
    Jan 13, 2019
    9
    Well, the second season is completely different than the first. And I get it, people wanted a sequel.
    They didn't get one. And it never was supposed to be one in the first place.
    Where the season 2 failed, is that is too convoluted for a show that airs weekly on TV. You definitely have to watch it in a shorter time span to keep up with the details. But it would be unfair to rate the    Well, the second season is completely different than the first. And I get it, people wanted a sequel.
    They didn't get one. And it never was supposed to be one in the first place.

    Where the season 2 failed, is that is too convoluted for a show that airs weekly on TV. You definitely have to watch it in a shorter time span to keep up with the details. But it would be unfair to rate the show based on this. 10 years ago this would be a no-no, sure, but now with the popularity of netflix streaming you can't judge based on this.

    If you disliked the show initially, try this, watch the show in a week, max 2 weeks span. It will completely change the perspective.

    It's more intense, fast paced and interesting than the first season. But it doesn't have the flair of the first season's characters and the story misses the dark mystery of the first. It also fails at the end to tie the story in a great ending.    … Expand
  40. SergioV
    Feb 17, 2016
    7
    Standing alone, True Detective Season 2 is a thrilling Crime Drama, however when compared to it's anthological first season, it's no match. Unfortunately for me, it seems as if they have tried just too hard to make the characters hard-boiled and gritty, and the plot way too complex.
  41. buddhalou
    Jan 21, 2019
    7
    Falls into the good, but not great category for me. Bit of a let-down and definitely not on par with the perfection of the first season, but still very watchable.
  42. abm0
    Sep 7, 2016
    9
    I have to believe people were expecting S2 to be S1 all over again, otherwise I can't explain the bad ratings they gave it, together with the critics. But then if it had been a reiteration of S1 they would've complained that it was a reiteration. I think their expectations got so warped out of shape by how good S1 was that they forgot to stay rational. And now we have this indefensiblyI have to believe people were expecting S2 to be S1 all over again, otherwise I can't explain the bad ratings they gave it, together with the critics. But then if it had been a reiteration of S1 they would've complained that it was a reiteration. I think their expectations got so warped out of shape by how good S1 was that they forgot to stay rational. And now we have this indefensibly deplorable score for S2 even though it was a very satisfying, dark and complex story, just one notch below the quality of S1.… Expand
  43. stevenf49
    May 25, 2018
    8
    O.k. , it wasn't up to Season 1...BUT hardly any other show is either. Rachel and Collin deserve a 10 Rating-their chemistry worked for me and the shame of it all is they we wont have them around anymore. Despite the bad writing, the show still had me interested in the characters. Even Vince's one note acting had me wanting to see what was going to happen to him. Bring on Season 3 thru 50.
  44. BeastJ18
    Apr 27, 2018
    8
    While this season is a huge insult to the near perfection that is Season 1 (see my other review)... It gets a lot of very harsh criticism. The direction is great, the performances are still very good and all other elements are fantastic. The only exception being the writing, I don't really need to discuss what was sub-par as many others have. While this is the only poor factor, it is ofWhile this season is a huge insult to the near perfection that is Season 1 (see my other review)... It gets a lot of very harsh criticism. The direction is great, the performances are still very good and all other elements are fantastic. The only exception being the writing, I don't really need to discuss what was sub-par as many others have. While this is the only poor factor, it is of course very important.… Expand
  45. prms
    Jul 31, 2018
    8
    No, it's not the masterpiece season one is, and it's cheesy now and again, and the plot is very complicated (though i think that's a strong point) But it's still great. I love the brooding vibe, the moral ambivalence of the main characters , the epic scope. I feel like a lot of people are hating on this cause they want it to be something else, instead of appreciating it for what it is.
  46. agentdocent
    Nov 4, 2017
    10
    Все великолепно, поначало кажется что второй сезон проигрывает первому по всем параметрам, но к концу он раскрывается по полной и показывается себя отличной драмой
  47. RaduA
    Feb 23, 2019
    7
    70/100

    I'm disappointed. The first season was really exciting, but this one did not really interest me.
  48. PolpredoX
    Jul 17, 2018
    9
    To the undecided, here's my story.

    I launched the first episode of season 2, I'm on my couch at the end of the afternoon. The opening titles "meh, I prefered the S1 opening title...". I paused the episode. "What the heck ? What's with the attitude ? Give it chance. Let's say you're watching a cop story. No more, no less". I tap the space bar, the episode credits roll. The morning    To the undecided, here's my story.

    I launched the first episode of season 2, I'm on my couch at the end of the afternoon. The opening titles "meh, I prefered the S1 opening title...". I paused the episode. "What the heck ? What's with the attitude ? Give it chance. Let's say you're watching a cop story. No more, no less". I tap the space bar, the episode credits roll.

    The morning after, I can tell you that this was more than a cop story. This was amazing. The actors were amazing. I mean, goddamn it, you need to see it to believe it.The story was. The music, goddamn Lera Lynn you're a genius, a muse of tears and sorrow, you leech my pain away. **** is not to be kidding with. Don't listen the rumors, watch it.    … Expand
  49. Gavalanche
    Jan 8, 2019
    9
    I actually really enjoyed this season, more than the first, strangely. There are masterful hands at work here.

    There is a lot to love.... for those who can see...
  50. Jspotter89
    Dec 14, 2015
    6
    Season 2 of True Detective is certainly something of a letdown. Gone is the character interactions and quality of writing that drove the first season to such heights. Instead, Season 2 gives us double the protagonists, about half the quality interaction between them, and not a shred of humor (intentional or otherwise) in its entire 8 episodes.

    Seriously, these are four broken human    Season 2 of True Detective is certainly something of a letdown. Gone is the character interactions and quality of writing that drove the first season to such heights. Instead, Season 2 gives us double the protagonists, about half the quality interaction between them, and not a shred of humor (intentional or otherwise) in its entire 8 episodes.

    Seriously, these are four broken human beings caught in the middle of an impenetrable mystery involving shadowy organizations, clandestine individuals, and layers upon layers of what can only be described as 'HUH?!?' Even in hindsight, having watched the whole season, I cannot wrap my mind around the conspiracy and events that transpired. The first three episodes are painfully obscured, which is okay given that the show is a mystery story, but you need the audience to be able to grasp certain elements of your mystery even from the outset.

    Revisiting the characters...they are well acted, certainly. Colin Farrell especially shines in his role. But the bottom line is that these characters are broken human beings, so morose and depressing that watching their story unfold is more burdensome than it is entertaining. It's not that Rust Cohle and Martin Hart were cut-ups, but they were able to jest every once in awhile. I can't recall a single instance of these characters laughing once the whole season. There are literally scenes where Farrell and Vaughn are in a bar (complete with mopey guitar-girl who shows up entirely too much), and they appear to be holding a contest to determine which one can look more forlorn. It's one thing to be "hard-boiled" and quite another to be clinically depressive.

    The anthology aspect of True Detective is one of the most interesting parts of the show. The bottom line that it provides is that, if one season is lackluster, as TD:S2 was, it doesn't necessarily mean that the entire series is screwed. Lets hope they course-correct back to greatness in Season 3.    … Expand
  51. eagleeyeviking
    Sep 2, 2016
    6
    True Detective maintains the first season's trait of developing its characters and delivering a grim but thought provoking outlook at the world, but where this season falters is its plot. It is simply too convoluted with too many characters and backstories to follow. The payoff in the end is also sloppily done, a disappointment given that the second season was interesting until a point.
  52. Jgl02
    Dec 12, 2015
    5
    I'm not a movie or show critic in the sense of the word, but compared to the first season, the second season really lacked.... something. I can't put my finger on it but I guess the whole premise, or plot, was weak. An oversexed, highly messed up in the head female detective; I like Colin Farrell, but he seems not to bring what he has, if he has something, onto this show.
  53. smithjbran
    Jul 31, 2016
    6
    There are a number of very interesting elements at play in this second season of True Detective, from the central mystery at its core - one which may reference such iconic Hollywood entries at The Maltese Falcon - to at least some of the performances.
  54. razavidavi
    Feb 9, 2019
    2
    Where do I start. Season 1 was excellent. The performances by McConaughey and Harrelson were top notch. The story was compelling, albeit a little abstract and then rushed to its conclusion.

    Season 2 was the exact opposite. I always wonder how this happens to something that was created with so much promise. The characters are all unlikable in the sense that you don't care about them. The    Where do I start. Season 1 was excellent. The performances by McConaughey and Harrelson were top notch. The story was compelling, albeit a little abstract and then rushed to its conclusion.

    Season 2 was the exact opposite. I always wonder how this happens to something that was created with so much promise. The characters are all unlikable in the sense that you don't care about them. The lines are very abstract for the sake of being abstract, with zero substance. Everything about this season screams pretentious and lacking substance. All the characters are flawed, yet band together for an altruistic mission. Come on give me a joke.

    Predictable at times, boring throughout, this is the fabric of a show that had a lot of promised, but burned on its own substance less grandeur. Somebody in the production process of this show really thought they had something that resembled a masterpiece, and hey with such a great cast and directing, sure you could have. But then you get this. its like a really good cut of rib eye steak. You pay top dollar. By the time you get home, your famished. You have all the right ingredients, you cook it for the right amount of time, it looks great. One bite, and you realize you under cooked it. All that went to waste. Now you could throw it back on the cast iron, but after its cooled down, your likely to get leather like steak. Gross.

    Luckily, Season 3 doesn't suffer this same fate. So there's that.    … Expand
  55. Johnth10
    Sep 3, 2020
    10
    Do not listen to reviews which compare it negatively with season 1. This one is just as good, maybe even better, but it's different style. Writer was smart enough, not to try to remake the first season, it would've been bad. It isn't. It's brilliant. Except for the intro song which is absolutely terrible. Just cut the sound on it, and enjoy the rest.
  56. geewah
    Jan 10, 2021
    7
    Not as bad as a lot of people are making out, but still a considerable drop in form from the first season. I don't mind the completely different direction the series has taken, just needs a better and more original story.
next
Page:

Awards & Rankings

4
#4 Most Discussed TV Season of 2015
56
#56 Most Shared TV Season of 2015

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
61

Generally favorable reviews - based on 41 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 20 out of 41
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 41
  3. Negative: 0 out of 41
  1. Wall Street Journal
    Reviewed by: John Anderson
    Jun 23, 2015
    50
    True Deetective is both underwritten and over-plotted.
    Read full review
  2. The Lincoln Journal Star
    Reviewed by: Jeff Korbelik
    Jun 22, 2015
    75
    It’s difficult to like or root for any of the four, making this one difficult watch. Still, creator and writer Nic Pizzolatto has a knack for storytelling and character development. Especially intriguing is Farrell.
    Read full review
  3. Kansas City Star
    Reviewed by: Sara Smith
    Jun 22, 2015
    60
    Although it was wise not to try to repeat the double interrogation format of the first season, there are clever nods to those closed-room confessionals, and the show eventually eases into rewarding drive-and-talks between Farrell and McAdams.... What keeps this Detective from being quite as compelling as the first is the lack of early focus.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »