• Network: HBO
  • Series Premiere Date: Jan 12, 2014
Season #: 4, 3, 2, 1
User Score
6.4

Generally favorable reviews- based on 837 Ratings

User score distribution:
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Buy on
Stream On

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

  1. Jun 21, 2015
    9
    Slow, but full of power, True Detective 2 maintains the tension and drama within the first season, with the omnipresence of a supernatural factor moving around every corner. Just give it some time, and prepare yourself to enter a new level of entertainment.

    A band apart is the photography, cinematography and cast. It may not be a Matthew McCounaghey tri-force, but its still soon to judge.
  2. Jun 25, 2015
    10
    Come on! You know it's going to get good! We have Crazy dad, Crazy sister and Tiger Woods. Nothing simple can come out of this. I'm excited to see how the players fit and how they become True Detectives.
  3. Jun 12, 2016
    9
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. True Detective Season 2 rocked. Well acted, Well written, Suspenseful and a mystery that dragged all the way to the end. Any comparisons to Season 1 is a waste of time. Season 2 stands on its own merits. Vince Vaughn, Rachel McAdams, Colin Farrell, Taylor Kitsch and an entire supporting cast is excellent. Nothing is cut and dry and the good guys are not always the good guys, but thankfully they are in far better shape than the ones they are after- a full on corrupted government and police department. This was very entertaining viewing and I did the smart thing- I rented the DVD and watched the whole thing.
    I would recommend this series highly.
    Expand
  4. Mar 1, 2018
    9
    The second season. Let's begin with that it's an another story, so don't hope for a sequel. It is very good too, but not as great as the first one in any aspect. If you like this genre, you won't be dissapointed any way, so if you ask, whether you should watch it or no? It's a yes!
  5. Jul 19, 2015
    8
    Yes season one was a masterpiece but why is everyone complaining? Yes it takes at least two eps to get into it but it is worth watching a lot better then 97% of thing on the tele even season 1 took a few eps to get involved plus I'm sure if da Vinci had painted the Mona Lisa then painted the same thing again with a different background you would complain?
  6. Aug 18, 2015
    8
    True Detective remains to be technically brilliant in it's second season. From the cinematography to the memorizing title sequence to the choice of music. While season two doesn't manage to recapture the pure brilliance of season 1, the second season stands alone as a thrilling and riveting crime drama with amazing performances from Colin Farrell and Rachel McAdams. The story does feel aTrue Detective remains to be technically brilliant in it's second season. From the cinematography to the memorizing title sequence to the choice of music. While season two doesn't manage to recapture the pure brilliance of season 1, the second season stands alone as a thrilling and riveting crime drama with amazing performances from Colin Farrell and Rachel McAdams. The story does feel a bit convoluted at times with Vaughn's character (who is good in the season) and suffers from an unfocused narrative, balancing too many characters and Taylor Kitsch being as bland as a rock. Expand
  7. Jun 29, 2015
    10
    This show has an incredible character development behind it and yet soon to be reveal. The first season was all about the environment and the dark and twitted atmosphere those character from the 1st season where into. But this one has and more tone down theme, but what holds it together and in a deep concept is the characters this actors play. How everything develops in its own right,This show has an incredible character development behind it and yet soon to be reveal. The first season was all about the environment and the dark and twitted atmosphere those character from the 1st season where into. But this one has and more tone down theme, but what holds it together and in a deep concept is the characters this actors play. How everything develops in its own right, alongside with the character development is a slow and steady intrigue to be discovered. Expand
  8. Jun 21, 2015
    8
    Different formula and larger scale, the rustic crime thriller is still bizarrely appealing. Season two is made with the purpose of not copying the plot of the first. It presents many perspectives in the span of one hour and less philosophical undertone. Despite many characters in play in relatively short time, the material and the performance by the cast are structurally solid. Pacing isDifferent formula and larger scale, the rustic crime thriller is still bizarrely appealing. Season two is made with the purpose of not copying the plot of the first. It presents many perspectives in the span of one hour and less philosophical undertone. Despite many characters in play in relatively short time, the material and the performance by the cast are structurally solid. Pacing is fast as it weaves more content, although I must admit, I do miss Matthew McConaughey and Woody Harrelson exchanging banters.

    The first episode deals mostly in characters' introduction by shifting between them in rapid pace. Colin Farrell as Detective Velcoro is looking strong on-screen. He embodies more of the exhausted police role than the rest, his character is volatile and definitely unfriendly. With his traumatic past, the only thing he seems to care about is his son, yet the relationship might not be healthy as his flaws are jarring. Taylor Kitsch plays Paul Woodrugh, a highway patrol. Secretive and disgruntled, he appears highly enigmatic. There's a calm air about him, not in suave manner, just eerie.

    Vince Vaughn as Frank Semyon is an odd addition, he's the cloak-and-dagger type business man. The show ventures a bit to political side with him, although his past with another character seems dubiously illicit. Rachel McAdams is a wild card. Her role as Detective Ani Bezzerides is probably the one with most reality drama worthy family, with webcam adult artist as sister and religious hermit as the father. It's unclear how the chemistry between them would manifest since they haven't spent much time stuck with each other, though the performance by the major actors are definitely presentable.

    For the production, it still exemplifies the quirky dusty ambiance from last season. There are plenty of high panoramic shots, mostly with cloudy and barren tone. Soundtracks of humming instrument and slow songs make for the striking sense of isolation. To its credit, the first episode packs a lot of content, although the script isn't as thought provoking as before.

    Whether season will reach the prominence of the first remains to be seen, people understandably expect it to be. However, with good cast and alluring dry atmosphere, it is still an engaging crime thriller on its own right.
    Expand
  9. Jul 15, 2015
    9
    By the midway point of this season, the converging plotlines seem just as promising as in season 1; maybe not quite, but close. Keyboard heroes and trashy published critics couldn't wait to rubbish it for not being everything S1was as a whole by the first hour of S2.
  10. Jul 19, 2015
    10
    Great show. I'm' tired to read articles saying they can't follow. Maybe pay more attention and stop complaining. Why insist in comparing with season 1 if we knew it was going to be different?
  11. Jul 15, 2015
    10
    True Detective 2 may be different from its previous season,but it doesn't mean that it is bad in any way.
    like season 1,season 2 plot starts to progress very slowly in first 2 episode,which is why I think people thought it was boring,but if you remember we had the same problem with season 1 first 2 episodes.
    As the story progress,it gets more and more interesting and you start to enjoy
    True Detective 2 may be different from its previous season,but it doesn't mean that it is bad in any way.
    like season 1,season 2 plot starts to progress very slowly in first 2 episode,which is why I think people thought it was boring,but if you remember we had the same problem with season 1 first 2 episodes.
    As the story progress,it gets more and more interesting and you start to enjoy and appreciate it more.
    as for new casts Colin Farrell plays damn well,I really like his expressions as a man that has lost everything and don't know why does he lives,as for Vince Vaughn people might not like his cold serious play,but I think its suitable for the character.the other casts Rachel McAdams and Taylor Kitsch plays well though they might not be as strong as the others characters or season 1 cast
    The musics by Lera Lynn specially "My Least Favorite Life" really adds another layer to the environment of this season which is really enjoyable
    all in all,don't listen to the negative reviews about this season,it is well written,well played,but a bit different from previous season but It is very enjoyable
    Expand
  12. Jul 9, 2015
    8
    I don't understand the bad reviews. We're really enjoying it. The dialog is a little forced but the characters and slick production are worth it. Yep, we loved season 1 and so far season 2 isn't as good, but after 3 episodes this show has been very entertaining.
  13. Jun 21, 2015
    8
    Although not as instantaneously additive or thought provoking as the first season's premiere, "The Western Book of the Dead" still serves as a intriguing start point to what looks like a promising season forthcoming.
  14. Aug 11, 2015
    8
    While this season’s case plot arc is too convoluted, the second season of True Detective is somehow enjoyable to watch on its own without being compared to the first season with thought-provoking themes, well-executed character plot arcs and stellar performances from Colin Farrell and Rachel McAdams.

    Rating: 7.5/10 Pros: +There were a lot of thought-provoking themes this season. One
    While this season’s case plot arc is too convoluted, the second season of True Detective is somehow enjoyable to watch on its own without being compared to the first season with thought-provoking themes, well-executed character plot arcs and stellar performances from Colin Farrell and Rachel McAdams.

    Rating: 7.5/10

    Pros:
    +There were a lot of thought-provoking themes this season. One particular theme I liked was Woodrugh’s plot arc that revolves seeing his homosexuality as a weakness and a shameful trait.
    +The character plot arcs are well-executed.
    +Colin Farrell’s and Rachel McAdams’ performances are stellar. It would be a huge snub if they’re not nominated for an Emmy next year.
    +I thought the season finale was actually satisfying.

    Neutral:
    .Vince Vaughn’s performance takes a lot of time to grow on. I am not impressed by his acting until the penultimate episode. Although I am am somehow impressed now, it took that long to make me change my opinion about someone’s acting so I can’t say it’s a good thing nor it’s a bad thing.
    .Season 2 of True Detective is no Season 1. But it’s still somehow enjoyable on its own.

    Cons:
    -The case plot arc is too convoluted to understand.
    -The change of setting to a bigger city is the reason why this season doesn’t feel special for me. The first season’s setting in which is set on a more isolated setting is one of the things that made me love about the first season.
    Expand
  15. Jul 24, 2015
    10
    Great second season. Great actors,writers,characters and story. Fast paced, suspenseful drama with depth. Enjoying it fully and can't wait to see what's coming next.

    For the naysayers, go back to watching The Bachelor or Under The Dome; it appears to be more your pace guys.
  16. Aug 4, 2015
    9
    Season 2 is fantastic.

    With an extremely complex plot and A LOT of characters, season 2 has been getting alot more criticisms than season 1. I think this is because this season is not made to be watched once a week; its either a binge watch show or a show that you need to re-watch. The plot is amazing, but extremely complex so if you view it one a week most of the small details, that
    Season 2 is fantastic.

    With an extremely complex plot and A LOT of characters, season 2 has been getting alot more criticisms than season 1. I think this is because this season is not made to be watched once a week; its either a binge watch show or a show that you need to re-watch. The plot is amazing, but extremely complex so if you view it one a week most of the small details, that end up really important, are lost on you.

    In short; the characters are great, the story is great, the cinematography is beautiful but the dialog is a little off sometimes and the pacing could be better. Still, fantastic season.
    Expand
  17. Mar 29, 2016
    8
    After the second season of True Detective ended it ended out okay but not as good compared to the previous season. However, I liked the second season of this show but there are negative things that I didn't like about this season when the show ended like that. And also I like to debunk this review in a pros and cons points to see what are the good things or bad things about this season..After the second season of True Detective ended it ended out okay but not as good compared to the previous season. However, I liked the second season of this show but there are negative things that I didn't like about this season when the show ended like that. And also I like to debunk this review in a pros and cons points to see what are the good things or bad things about this season..

    PROS:
    + Colin Farrell, Rachel McAdams, Taylor Kitsch, Kelly Reilly, and Vince Vaughn's performances
    + T-Bone Burnett's haunting score
    + Excellent soundtrack choices that lighten up the tone for this season
    + The last four episodes spice's things up
    + That orgy infiltration party scene
    + Physical action and shootouts scenes

    CONS:
    - Too much stories on other main characters makes this season confusing to watch
    - There are awkward moments in writing that affects the actor's performances
    - All these stories together should've extend about 4 more episodes instead of 8
    - Too many directors directing different episodes which makes the first half of this season so confusing to watch
    - The ending of this season was disappointing with no happy ending compared to the previous god-like season
    FINAL NOTE: This latest installment of True Detective is good still but not that satisfying enough to entertain the audience that came from the last season like me. However, I still love True Detective no matter what but it is better that Nic Pizzolatto to take his time really slowly. Because I noticed that this show feels rushed when the first season started out very steadily. Word an advice Nic, take your time if you want to put a lot of things in your show why not just extend it about 2 or 4 episodes for once and look for a better director next time instead of you having to get all directors direct different episode at once.
    VERDICT: 8/10
    Expand
  18. Jun 22, 2015
    8
    Pretty solid from the very start, a lot of information to assimilate in the first episode, a lot of talk and character stories, the pace is different compared to the first season, but I avoid as much a I can to think about Season 1 while watching Season 2. Rust and Marty and the actors performing aren't coming back, we have to get over it to enjoy this new season. It will be impossible toPretty solid from the very start, a lot of information to assimilate in the first episode, a lot of talk and character stories, the pace is different compared to the first season, but I avoid as much a I can to think about Season 1 while watching Season 2. Rust and Marty and the actors performing aren't coming back, we have to get over it to enjoy this new season. It will be impossible to match last season's quality.

    The plot is more of a mainstream crime story this time like we are more used to (mob, cops, deal going wrong implicating everyone), just hoping it won't get too mainstream and please don't make Rachel McAdams's character an invention to please that yapping feminist audience.

    I found the writing and character play quite convincing for now, even though the protagonists seem to have an overly dramatic background, maybe to compensate on the lack of darkness we have this time. I just hope it won't go too much on the self-pity pathos, yet it is going to be hard to fit four in depth character stories in 8 episodes.

    It is still too early to judge, yet it has been confirmed that the story picks up pretty fast after the couple of first episodes.

    How official press critic reviewers manage to give this a 62 after seeing three or four episodes, while promoting recent examples of garbage writing and acting like GoT Season 5 and the entire Walking Dead series with 80s and 90s is BEYOND ME.
    Expand
  19. Jun 21, 2015
    9
    (Based on episode 1) An almost perfect set up episode, Colin Farrel was excellent, but this season can't be that slow, we need some action in the next few episodes.
  20. Jul 20, 2015
    9
    People are so quick to judge. Let's not forgot that season 1 took some time to develop too. I have to admit, episode's 1 and most of 2 had me almost falling asleep. But from the shotgun to the chest at the end of episode 2 to now the season woke up, all characters being properly developed now and let's just say if you've seen episode 4 and still think this season sucks then there's noPeople are so quick to judge. Let's not forgot that season 1 took some time to develop too. I have to admit, episode's 1 and most of 2 had me almost falling asleep. But from the shotgun to the chest at the end of episode 2 to now the season woke up, all characters being properly developed now and let's just say if you've seen episode 4 and still think this season sucks then there's no convincing anyway Expand
  21. Jul 20, 2015
    10
    I don't get all the hate or people saying they don't get it. I'm loving it and especially at the end of 4 and 5 can't wait to see how it ends. I don't know if people are comparing it to season 1 when it shouldnt. It's a whole new show new story new characters only the title name is the same. It doesn't have the chase a serial killer scenario like season 1 but it has political corruptionI don't get all the hate or people saying they don't get it. I'm loving it and especially at the end of 4 and 5 can't wait to see how it ends. I don't know if people are comparing it to season 1 when it shouldnt. It's a whole new show new story new characters only the title name is the same. It doesn't have the chase a serial killer scenario like season 1 but it has political corruption and cover up murder. I'm glad it's not going the serial killer route again seeing as that has been overplayed for years. If you like LA No ire James Ellroy novels or the Chinatown movie this is for you. Don't listen to the haters judge it yourself if you don't like it cool. This isnt a show where you can stare at your phone while watching it. Its like a book. Got to put phone down for an hour and don't expect anything every scene just listen and watch what's happening and enjoy as the tension builds up till it gets to a boiling point like it did in episode 5. It's that point in the book where you stay up late binge reading cause you have to see what happens in the end Expand
  22. Jul 26, 2015
    10
    I won't be so insulting to say that if you don't like this you're stupid. It is just that you need to know it is not a regular TV show, more of a novel. It is slow, noir, hopeless and sometimes, yes, annoying. If each episode is a chapter, I am enough interested to discover the next one. If you want hectic, saturated story and images à la CSI, you are at the wrong place. From a TV show onI won't be so insulting to say that if you don't like this you're stupid. It is just that you need to know it is not a regular TV show, more of a novel. It is slow, noir, hopeless and sometimes, yes, annoying. If each episode is a chapter, I am enough interested to discover the next one. If you want hectic, saturated story and images à la CSI, you are at the wrong place. From a TV show on HBO I am expecting: good story, good artistic direction, good soundtrack, good sound/image/feel; it's all there. But the most outstanding aspect is the acting. Flawless all around acting. I did not know McAdams, just that it was against her usual character, nor Kitsch and I became a believer. Vaughn, Farrell and Reilly are all convincing. Supporting actresses and actors alike are excellent, like Coster, Spencer or Davidovich. I am sadden by the poor review. Imagine it gave the idea to HBO to not do that kind of shows, who would? Expand
  23. Jul 28, 2015
    10
    Ótimas atuações, belo cenário, seriado que vem evoluindo bem, espero me surpreender!

    Elementos mais simplistas que também vem a acrescer com a qualidade é abertura.
  24. Jun 21, 2015
    8
    It started slow,but I think it will improve,it was pretty similar to former season's first episode.I like very much Farrel's performance,the best for me so far.Mc Adams and Kitsch were good,I hope they get better through next episodes.A good start for one of my favorite Tv Shows
  25. Jun 23, 2015
    8
    I watch pilot.
    In first 20 mins, were pretty confused and messed .
    but as the episode is nearing the end of an impression on the TV series grew better and better.
  26. Jul 22, 2015
    10
    This show has excellent acting and story, the low scores it may get is because of the short attention spans of some the users here. Each episode is building tension, the story is solid. Too bad people tend to get sketchy when the plot is mildly complicated. Great season so far.
  27. Jul 25, 2015
    8
    Critics be damned. I am enjoying the second season. I agree it does not match the first but that was going to be impossible. I like the doom and gloom. I like the misery, the drug and alcohol abuse. I think Vaughn's comedies are horrible so it is great to see him in this roll. GOT really missed it this year but this has my attention. Sometimes the critics just do not know when to enjoy.
  28. Jul 18, 2015
    10
    True Detective S2 is a slow burn, an intellectual, not easy to read or consume, intimate yet repulsive look at the lives of three police officers who are on the edge of death or redemption. The cinematography is an empirical delight, the haunting scenes put you there. The diction and subtly of the script and character arcs means it requires sophisticated viewing...which is why its likelyTrue Detective S2 is a slow burn, an intellectual, not easy to read or consume, intimate yet repulsive look at the lives of three police officers who are on the edge of death or redemption. The cinematography is an empirical delight, the haunting scenes put you there. The diction and subtly of the script and character arcs means it requires sophisticated viewing...which is why its likely so many folks don't like this season as much. They don't get . My recommendation: watch ea. episode 3 times. Brilliant casting...this gives Farrell a second life, his vulnerability and intuition are uncanny as a seventies style burn out copper. McAdams owns her role, mother hen, sexual dominatrix and action s/hero all rolled into one. Vaughn is the strangest, yet most intriguing bad guy since Tony Soprano. We want to both laugh and cry at him, and we are horrified too. The real time feel to the action is very avant garde as mainstream TV goes. Again, this one burns slow...but its red hot. Expand
  29. Aug 3, 2015
    9
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. While I can understand early confusion regarding the second season of True Detective, I think most are missing what's going on. If you think the first season was dark, you're in for a surprise. We often look at the most barbaric acts as something done by the uneducated, the misfortunate, the sick, the poor. Season 2 is rocking the commonplace conception that civilization is civilized. And doing it in an extremely timely and interesting way. This is where I'm hoping the core of the story isn't lost on the masses.

    There's a long history of socio-political analogy in "The Wizard of Oz", and this is exactly what we have here: a modern interpretation. Ani is Dorothy, Ray is the Tin Man, Paul is the Cowardly Lion and Frank is the Scarecrow. The masses are Munchkins, obliviously carrying on their hard-working lives as long as the status quo is kept intact. But it's not.

    Ani came from humble and virginal beginnings, but the good daughter fairytale is long dead. While Dorothy was a character pure of heart and mind, Ani is the everywoman who's been forced down the darkest of dark paths. Her childhood rape shaped her entire existence, and she's long prepared for a worst-case scenario of retribution, something she's now had a taste of.

    Ray is a man in a hard metal exterior, hardened then rusted by his experiences. When he couldn't be there for his wife in need, his anger grew and he sought revenge. Now he's learning he made mistakes, and through social lubrication (particularly with Ani), he's able to be a functional adult again. But he still lives in the shadow of knowing he can rust solid, never to be repaired. This is partially evident in his substance abuse. Avoiding reality.

    Paul has every decoration of a hunter and is the personification of bravery. The king of the jungle. His war record and his duties as an officer of the law are the cornerstone of who he is. But he has secrets. Ones that scare him. Ones that ultimately are his downfall because his cowardice eats him. For all his training and resolve, his incomparable truth is his weakness. Homosexuality is literally a thorn in his paw.

    The three of them are normal people who society has changed. Gone are the G-rated tropes of yesteryear, and the plight of the common man. Each embodies our worst unspoken sexual fears. You could even make the analogy the source material made: hard working common people from various walks of life coming together in similar misfortune.

    And Frank. Oh Frank. He's the Scarecrow. The straw man. The original analogy was the farm workers of America, but Frank takes it much further. He has no clue of his roots. He was an orphan. He built himself up, stuffed his own shirt with golden straw, and filled himself out as a man. But straw burns, and he's been burned and left for dead by flying monkeys (various henchmen). The fire analogy is even stronger by him burning his properties to the ground in retaliation.

    They all started on slightly different paths, but now converge around something they all have mutual interest in. And where The Wizard of Oz skips over the darkest parts of their journey, this miniseries delves into the depths for each of them. Each has or will be confronted by the cornerstone of their fears. They'll all be challenged in their own pit of hellfire and brimstone.

    While we don't have the antagonist to point a finger at yet, we know exactly who it is. It's an allegory. The villain is those who make the decisions for all of us, those who write the law but are above it. The villain is corruption. It's the modern mafia, and how they've moved into legitimate business delving deeper into unfathomable corruption. We might not know their names or faces, but they tug at the strings of reality like we're all starting to be familiar with in the real world. The land and rail deal of Season 2 is a microcosm, an intimate biopsy into a larger cancer, insinuating the multi-headed beast lurking in the shadows in a way that hasn't been done since Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut. We know it's there.

    These four characters are wondering through the dark part of the forest. They're all on a quest to get the Wizard from different sides of the law... but nobody gets to see the Wizard.

    I can't wait to see the finale.
    Expand
  30. Jun 24, 2015
    9
    Wow without having seen season 1 I checked out the first episode of season 2 I loved the eerieness to it and the nods to Stanley Kubrick and David Lynch through the film with its wide shot and aerial shots the performances are amazing and intrigues me to watch more I loved the music and some people reviewed that they hated it but I thought it fit well I look forward to watching more ofWow without having seen season 1 I checked out the first episode of season 2 I loved the eerieness to it and the nods to Stanley Kubrick and David Lynch through the film with its wide shot and aerial shots the performances are amazing and intrigues me to watch more I loved the music and some people reviewed that they hated it but I thought it fit well I look forward to watching more of this and seeing the characters develop and what their motivations are. I've been wanting to see season one so I can't compare it but I love this so far Expand
Metascore
61

Generally favorable reviews - based on 41 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 20 out of 41
  2. Negative: 0 out of 41
  1. Reviewed by: John Anderson
    Jun 23, 2015
    50
    True Deetective is both underwritten and over-plotted.
  2. Reviewed by: Jeff Korbelik
    Jun 22, 2015
    75
    It’s difficult to like or root for any of the four, making this one difficult watch. Still, creator and writer Nic Pizzolatto has a knack for storytelling and character development. Especially intriguing is Farrell.
  3. Reviewed by: Sara Smith
    Jun 22, 2015
    60
    Although it was wise not to try to repeat the double interrogation format of the first season, there are clever nods to those closed-room confessionals, and the show eventually eases into rewarding drive-and-talks between Farrell and McAdams.... What keeps this Detective from being quite as compelling as the first is the lack of early focus.