• Network: HBO
  • Series Premiere Date: Apr 22, 2017
Metascore
64

Generally favorable reviews - based on 22 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 11 out of 22
  2. Negative: 0 out of 22

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Brian Lowry
    Apr 21, 2017
    50
    Despite noble intentions, though, HBO has set a high bar for its movies, and the task of transforming this adaptation into something with a life beyond the printed page is where Henrietta Lacks proves lacking.
  2. Reviewed by: Ben Travers
    Apr 19, 2017
    58
    The film is torn between assigning drama to Deborah’s unquantifiable emotional needs and the easily tracked progress of Skloot’s book. While Deborah seeks closure, Skloot seeks publishing, and though the link between the two is clear and necessary, we simply don’t care that much about a book being written when Deborah’s anguish is realized by Winfrey with such passion.
  3. Reviewed by: Josh Bell
    Apr 20, 2017
    50
    It’s often hokey and overstated, with Winfrey giving a broad, showy performance. By the end, you get the idea that Henrietta Lacks was very important, but as a person, she remains distant.
  4. Reviewed by: Rob Owen
    Apr 21, 2017
    50
    It’s a role that could fall into caricature, but Ms. Winfrey brings vulnerability and believability to the part. Henrietta Lacks also benefits from a strong supporting cast. ... The film, directed by George C. Wolfe (“Lackawanna Blues”), stumbles most profoundly in the way it wraps up. The conclusion to the 90-minute film comes too quickly with an abrupt shift in tone.
  5. Reviewed by: Brian Tallerico
    Apr 21, 2017
    50
    Nothing feels invested in long enough to register because the narrative is constantly jumping around, almost as if it’s scared there’s not enough story here to carry a film. Thank God for great casting. Winfrey is typically fantastic.
  6. Reviewed by: Caitlin PenzeyMoog
    Apr 21, 2017
    58
    The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lacks is too sentimental for its own good. It’s not really fair to compare a film to its original source material--books and movies are different mediums with different strengths--but it’s hard not to rue what’s lost in this version, which skimps over both the science and the relationships that form the heart of Skloot’s book. At least Winfrey’s performance brings Deb to boisterous, believable life.
  7. Reviewed by: Lenika Cruz
    Apr 24, 2017
    50
    Winfrey’s performance as Deborah gives The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks its one bit of genuine brilliance. ... Beyond Winfrey, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks has the markings of a standard TV movie, though there’s a clear mismatch between form and content.
  8. Reviewed by: Keith Uhlich
    Apr 17, 2017
    40
    With the exception of Renée Elise Goldsberry--who gives a half-saintly, half-corporeal dignity to Henrietta herself in a few brief flashback scenes--director and cowriter George C. Wolfe, a terrific theater artist, seems to have instructed Winfrey, Byrne and the rest of the cast to play to some nonexistent rafters. And this only pays off twice.
  9. Reviewed by: Neil Genzlinger
    Apr 20, 2017
    50
    Watch the film for a well acted Cliffs Notes version of the book--intriguing and thought provoking, but also frustrating.
  10. Reviewed by: Kristi Turnquist
    Apr 18, 2017
    50
    The story of Henrietta Lacks is too big to be compressed into 90 minutes. And though it's made with all the good intentions in the world, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks feels rushed and cramped.
  11. Reviewed by: Alan Sepinwall
    Apr 20, 2017
    50
    The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks on the whole is a missed opportunity, despite some strong individual moments and a fine cast that also includes Reg E. Cathey, Rocky Carroll, and Peter Gerety. Oprah’s so good in it, though.
User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 14 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 6 out of 14
  2. Negative: 5 out of 14
  1. Feb 4, 2018
    6
    You will know everything, but Henrietta Lacks!

    It's a good biographical drama, but the only problem is its not what exactly the title says.
    You will know everything, but Henrietta Lacks!

    It's a good biographical drama, but the only problem is its not what exactly the title says. If you believed to learn about Henrietta Lacks and went to see it, you might end disappointingly. Because she was the only topic of the story, not the actual story, except a few glimpses. It is like you watched 'Infamous' or 'Capote', instead of 'In Cold Blood'. That's what like this film. Yet not a bad film.

    A writer pursuing the family members of a person who lived in the mid 20th century, because she was a medical phenomenon. Her cells used to treat cancer, despite she had died of cancer, leaving her young kids behind. Her descendants not aware of how things work in the medical research, only misguided by others, finally, set to discover the truth themselves about all the fuss.

    It was nominated for the Emmy, but did not win. Oprah was okay, but Rose Byrne impressed me. Except a misleading title, it is a good film, but I really wanted/want to know the Henrietta Lacks. That's funny, because they have told us an unnecessary story. I hope somebody would make a film about actual Henrietta Lacks!

    5.5/10
    Full Review »
  2. Apr 25, 2017
    8
    Well done. I bumped this movie up two points right off because the story of Henrietta, the Lacks family and the HeLa cells is so amazing thatWell done. I bumped this movie up two points right off because the story of Henrietta, the Lacks family and the HeLa cells is so amazing that it grabs your attention and won't let go. Like Hidden Figures, this covers an extremely crucial piece of scientific history that has been neglected for far too long.
    The style of direction, a little unpolished or raw, works for the material though some of the dialog was hard to follow. All the acting was competent, I recognized several of my favorite go-to character actors in there, and they presented the characters well.
    The biggest problem with the movie is that it is a book to movie adaptation. These are notoriously difficult because you can't fit a book in 90 minutes of film. I could see the gaps where the director skipped portions of the book that went into greater detail, and those moments detracted from the rest of the movie. I think the director did a good job representing the sections that ended up being dramatized, but I definitely need to go out and read the book to find out the rest of the story.
    Full Review »
  3. Apr 24, 2017
    8
    PowerfulPowerful .................................................................................................................................................................... Full Review »