• Network: NBC
  • Series Premiere Date: Sep 18, 2006
User Score
8.3

Universal acclaim- based on 329 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 40 out of 329
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Buy on
Stream On

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

  1. crystalh
    Oct 23, 2006
    10
    This is a GREAT new show! Give it a chance, it's something different for once.
  2. carrif
    Dec 4, 2006
    10
    this is the smartest show on tv right now. the dialog is constantly brilliant. i'm shocked at how great matthew perry is.....sorkin has done it - again!
  3. VicC
    Oct 24, 2006
    10
    I'm amazed at any negative comments or ratings, I think the show is thought provoking while still being very entertaining. I've been captivated. Very well done.
  4. JoanB
    Oct 24, 2006
    10
    Love this show! The character development has been great especially regarding Harriet. I like the fact that it is not quite a comedy but not quite a drama. I am hoping this show sticks around for a long time!
  5. AaronV
    Oct 25, 2006
    10
    this show is pritty effin sweet
  6. SarahS
    Dec 5, 2006
    10
    this is the only show on this season that I feel I HAVE to watch...I love the sub-plots' twists and turns, some predictable, others not...and there hasn't been an episode yet that hasn't had me laughing out loud! Kudos to NBC for deciding to give Studio 60 the time for the audience to "catch on" to its brilliance.
  7. JoseL
    Oct 25, 2006
    9
    great show, taking to long to build a story line.
  8. ChrisG
    Oct 26, 2006
    10
    Never watched Sorkin's other show... But won't miss an episode of this one... Great, great writing. Perry deserves best acting considerations at next Emmys.
  9. JackieM
    Oct 26, 2006
    10
    I think the writing is amazing. It is a genius blend of intelligence, wit, and funny one-liners. the characters are interesting and I believe Matthew Perry was born to play this role, I've never seen him act so well. The entire cast is amazing!
  10. RickK
    Oct 5, 2006
    10
    Great! The show is one of the best on TV. Perry and Whitford are emmy level.
  11. MFinn
    Oct 5, 2006
    10
    This show is going to be a hit!
  12. JanetK
    Oct 8, 2006
    10
    I love this show. I was a CSI:Miami fan but dropped them like a hot potato, after seeing "Studio 60"! I think that this is a tough time slot for any new show, that hasn't had time to establish a fan base, but I'm sure that anyone that watches "Studio 60" will be hooked!
  13. MD
    Oct 9, 2006
    5
    Studio 60 is one of those shows that has an okay premise, but thinks it has an amazing one, and as a result takes itself way to seriously. It feels somewhat like they are trying to toot their own horn, if you will, like, look how talented and incredible we comedy folk are! As if they are saving the world with each script they write or something... (I like a good laugh as much as the next Studio 60 is one of those shows that has an okay premise, but thinks it has an amazing one, and as a result takes itself way to seriously. It feels somewhat like they are trying to toot their own horn, if you will, like, look how talented and incredible we comedy folk are! As if they are saving the world with each script they write or something... (I like a good laugh as much as the next person but, let's get real, the world would not end without this show...) Also, the writing is so slick and witty sometimes that it feels artificial, like some Neil Simon plays often come across. It is hard to connect and be engaged by artifice. The pilot itself discusses this phenomenom when Harriet asks Matt why this one joke didn't work. And he says something like it didn't work because, "you were asking for the laugh. The first time you just asked them to pass the salt." That what it feels like with this show sometimes--they are ASKING for the laugh, and not just being funny. And the result is a feeling of plastic humor, well-crafted but not alive. If the show could find some humility, reality, and humanity, you could turn their very legitimate talent into something worth watching more than a few minutes at a time. Expand
  14. grahaml
    Sep 18, 2006
    0
    All the characters are unlikable. One of the worst shows I have ever had the misfortune of wasting an hour of my life on. Judd Hirsch was great and then it just tanked.
  15. Dan
    Sep 18, 2006
    8
    I'm curious to see where the series goes, and isn't that really the whole point of the premiere episode; to pique interest? The pilot wasn't perfect (as Bobbo W pointed out below, it can be seen as pretentious at times and it seems like a lot of fuss over what's a SNL-style sketch show), but I found it genuinely entertaining and think it could be headed in an I'm curious to see where the series goes, and isn't that really the whole point of the premiere episode; to pique interest? The pilot wasn't perfect (as Bobbo W pointed out below, it can be seen as pretentious at times and it seems like a lot of fuss over what's a SNL-style sketch show), but I found it genuinely entertaining and think it could be headed in an interesting direction. Expand
  16. PennyW
    Sep 18, 2006
    0
    The high point of the episode was when they showed the Sowden House that was previously seen in Cycle 6 of America's Next Top Model. Otherwise it was a very contrived, very boring look at a mock SNL world..
  17. LonnieB
    Sep 18, 2006
    9
    Didn't think I would like it, but pleasantly surprised
  18. BobW
    Sep 18, 2006
    9
    This show has a snap, pacing, intelligence and wit. And it's made for TV?
  19. BobboW
    Sep 18, 2006
    2
    Old, trite, pretentous. The professional critics are in love with the sound of their own voices. This is a show that acts as if the rise and fall of a late night comedy is the equivalent of the rise and fall of the Roman Empire. It's a lot of strum and drang about nothing.
  20. jw
    Sep 19, 2006
    10
    Oh it had been too long already! How fitting that it is Sorkin himself that comes to rescue us now from the tremendous void created by The West Wing's retirement. Like the West Wing (and Sports Night and The American President before that), this is essentially the creative equivalent of an All-Star Game, with elite writers lobbing up great lines for elite actors to smash out of the Oh it had been too long already! How fitting that it is Sorkin himself that comes to rescue us now from the tremendous void created by The West Wing's retirement. Like the West Wing (and Sports Night and The American President before that), this is essentially the creative equivalent of an All-Star Game, with elite writers lobbing up great lines for elite actors to smash out of the park. Remember Michael Douglas declaring that people "don't drink the sand because they're thirsty, they drink because they don't know the difference" ? That theme is dealt with in different context here, but just as effectively. Like Whitford and Busfield, Matthew Perry seems to have been born to read script by Sorkin & Co. So does Amanda Peet, who floats easily through scenes as the latest in a series of smart female roles from this writing team. Fellow Sports Night fans were no doubt pleased by the nod to one of those roles with the return cameo by Huffman (as herself, in Looking-Glass fashion). After yet another summer of non-television, how joyous it was to be revived by programming that is worthy of television's often squandered power. Sound overly dramatic? Have you SEEN what passes for commerial television? Is Studio 60 really that good? Is the rest just that bad? I think both. Expand
  21. RachelJ
    Sep 19, 2006
    10
    Loved the pilot. I am a huge Mathew Perry fan, and along with all the other stars on this show, I think it will go places.
  22. DuaneL
    Sep 19, 2006
    10
    Wonderful! Witty! Can't wait for week 2. Saturday Sportsnight Live
  23. LindaL
    Sep 19, 2006
    2
    Yet another episode of "Left-WIng Hypocrites Can Save the World." The show includes a "Christian" character just so she can be the recipient of scathing put-downs from the Matthew Perry character. Can't wait till Sorkin introduces a Demonic Republican character, too. Just give the show an Emmy now!
  24. StevenS
    Sep 19, 2006
    10
    Mathew Perry is amazing in this role. In a few years we'll be saying "Chandler who?"
  25. PhyllisP.
    Sep 19, 2006
    9
    I have loved Aaron Sorkin's writings since Sports Night [and since I am a 66 year old grandmother, I'm obviously not his target audience] Which leaves me to the only criticism.. have the actors slow down and speak more clearly so the wit and wisdom can be heard.
  26. Larryw
    Sep 19, 2006
    0
    boring!!!! I wasn't a big W Wing fan but at least the underlying setting and issues were of substance. Who needs an overly talky inside baseball show about people trying to save the soul of TV while making big bucks. But that's par for the course in a society where tabloid mags outsell the New Yorker by 100,000 : 1 and more people care how much Paris Hilton drinks than about the boring!!!! I wasn't a big W Wing fan but at least the underlying setting and issues were of substance. Who needs an overly talky inside baseball show about people trying to save the soul of TV while making big bucks. But that's par for the course in a society where tabloid mags outsell the New Yorker by 100,000 : 1 and more people care how much Paris Hilton drinks than about the 100,000s in Darfur that don't have enough drinking water. In other words it should be a hit as a "serirous" show, Aaargh btw I fell asleep after 20 mins, woke up turned it off and read a book Expand
  27. JanW
    Sep 21, 2006
    9
    Sorkin is always a bright light in the Vast Wasteland. It remains to be seen if this great cast can rise to a 10.
  28. MarioC
    Sep 21, 2006
    10
    This show have a lot of potencial............. Dejenlo Desarrollarse !!!! Do not Cancel it !!!!
  29. KristyS
    Sep 20, 2006
    9
    I loved it. I thought it had a great cast.
  30. AJC
    Sep 20, 2006
    10
    This is an excellent show. I don't care if only 13 million people watched the pilot. We fans will be loyal to this show! It's one of few smart, network primetime shows.
  31. AnnieM
    Sep 20, 2006
    10
    Ah, at last! Television for adults. I missed out on The West Wing, but I won't be missing a minute of Sorkin's latest. Excellent writing, solid acting...even the music was outstanding. Just watching this made me feel smarter and classier.
  32. LelandK
    Sep 20, 2006
    10
    By far the best show of the year! It has it all: Celebrities, acting, drama, comedy and music. What more do you want from a great show?
  33. WomboM
    Sep 22, 2006
    3
    Dear god, I had forgotten what a tedious blowhard Sorkin is. The sets are beautiful, tho!
  34. TheoG
    Sep 22, 2006
    10
    All I can say is "Wow". Classic Sorkin at work. That opening scene where the camera works its way through the studio, weaving in and out of people walking by as you learn the basics of what's going on - well, we've seen that technique work to amazing effect on The West Wing, and it worked just as well here. Within seconds I knew this was supposed to be the set of Saturday Night All I can say is "Wow". Classic Sorkin at work. That opening scene where the camera works its way through the studio, weaving in and out of people walking by as you learn the basics of what's going on - well, we've seen that technique work to amazing effect on The West Wing, and it worked just as well here. Within seconds I knew this was supposed to be the set of Saturday Night Live, and Judd Hirsh was Lorne Michaels. Not once during the opening episode did I think "hey, it's Chandler" or "hey, it's Josh!". Matthew Perry and Bradley Whitford were able, in my view, to completely separate themselves from their former characters on Friends and The West Wing - no small task since those characters were incredibly unique. Not sold on Amanda Peet's character, she seems to drift off into her own world too often to be this hard-nosed executive that she's supposed to be. Time will tell. Her character seems very bright. I can't wait til Monday! Expand
  35. peterw
    Sep 22, 2006
    10
    I didn't like the "The Network" flashback but otherwise this is a good show with a huge potential. The US media is ripe for some skewering and I hope the show will enlighten the public to the truly unpleasant things that go on behind the glitzy facade. the drama was involving, the characters attractive and the acting great. I am particularly glad to see Matthew Perry giving a fine I didn't like the "The Network" flashback but otherwise this is a good show with a huge potential. The US media is ripe for some skewering and I hope the show will enlighten the public to the truly unpleasant things that go on behind the glitzy facade. the drama was involving, the characters attractive and the acting great. I am particularly glad to see Matthew Perry giving a fine dramatic performance - he could be an actor finding his stride. Expand
  36. richards
    Sep 25, 2006
    4
    Not living up to the hype. Basically a very indulgent Aaron Sorkin mash...I'm giving up on it after two episodes.
  37. S.L.O'Robot
    Sep 26, 2006
    5
    Nice cast, and the show looks great. Bores me to death, beyond that. Fast talk does not always equal snappy dialogue (ever sat through an episode of "Gilmore Girls"? Then you'll know what I'm talking about). I would say Sorkin's past his prime, but his body of work has been so consistently overrated that I'm not sure where the prime ends/begins. And let me say the Nice cast, and the show looks great. Bores me to death, beyond that. Fast talk does not always equal snappy dialogue (ever sat through an episode of "Gilmore Girls"? Then you'll know what I'm talking about). I would say Sorkin's past his prime, but his body of work has been so consistently overrated that I'm not sure where the prime ends/begins. And let me say the following for those who never had the temerity to say it: "Sports Night" was just plain awful. Expand
  38. AnonymousMC
    Sep 28, 2006
    1
    Self important crap
  39. KellyBean
    Sep 28, 2006
    1
    This show is full of a bunch of characters who I couldn't care less to learn more about. Studio 60 is clearly geared towards entertainment industry people (probably trying to steal some of Entourage's thunder...nice try), and the reality of that is NO ONE cares what stupid things happen in these people's lives EXCEPT INDUSTRY PEOPLE who are the same ones who have given it This show is full of a bunch of characters who I couldn't care less to learn more about. Studio 60 is clearly geared towards entertainment industry people (probably trying to steal some of Entourage's thunder...nice try), and the reality of that is NO ONE cares what stupid things happen in these people's lives EXCEPT INDUSTRY PEOPLE who are the same ones who have given it such skewed and raving reviews. This show is TERRIBLE! Expand
  40. MattK
    Sep 28, 2006
    9
    Simply put, the best new show of the season! I have sorely missed Aaron Sorkin's "type" of dramatics and comedy, and right on the money dialogue, and here is he! Back in full flavor! I' keep trying to tell my partner that this show may even be better than The West Wing (Which we both adored) but he is calling me blasphemous.. lol. He like the show also, though. I can see this Simply put, the best new show of the season! I have sorely missed Aaron Sorkin's "type" of dramatics and comedy, and right on the money dialogue, and here is he! Back in full flavor! I' keep trying to tell my partner that this show may even be better than The West Wing (Which we both adored) but he is calling me blasphemous.. lol. He like the show also, though. I can see this show possibly dominating the Emmy's next year.... only time will tell.. After 1 episode, i was hooked, now after watching epidsode 2, I can now call myself a loyal Studio follower. Expand
  41. DougB
    Sep 28, 2006
    9
    Fast-paced, quick witted dialogue
  42. LindaB
    Sep 29, 2006
    10
    Superb! Sorkin does it again!
  43. EricW
    Sep 29, 2006
    9
    Part of my enthusiasm for "Studio 60" is in the potential to reclaim the "Sports Night"-era glory, which, along with "Arrested Development," stand as the greatest shows dead before their time. Although the first episodes were witty and finely paced, there is the feeling that Sorkin is trying to force his return to former glory. A lot of the entertainment value comes from the meta Part of my enthusiasm for "Studio 60" is in the potential to reclaim the "Sports Night"-era glory, which, along with "Arrested Development," stand as the greatest shows dead before their time. Although the first episodes were witty and finely paced, there is the feeling that Sorkin is trying to force his return to former glory. A lot of the entertainment value comes from the meta elements, as in when the show-within-the-show becomes a commentary on the show itself. For example, when the cast of the sketch show sing: "We hope that you don't mind that our producer was caught doing blow." Expand
  44. JerryR
    Sep 30, 2006
    9
    So far nothing seems missing from this show. It is a treat to watch and moves in and out of the characters so far that we have come to like some, cheer for some, not yet know some well enough to know for sure but that will come. It will be interesting to see if Mr. Sorkin can maintain this energy - but I assure I will be watching to find out.
  45. RoseM.
    Oct 25, 2007
    9
    Excellent to watch, it so well made and acted it's like living it. Witty and touching.
  46. Marya
    Feb 12, 2007
    10
    Hands down! The best written and acted drama-comedy this year. When Jack Bauer stops to eat and we get tired of seeing David Caruso taking off his sunglasses, there will be great tv. coming from the makers of this show.
  47. ValC
    Feb 23, 2007
    10
    This is one of the best shows of the season. It is about time that there is show with wit & intelligence. I hope NBC gives it another chance by moving it to a different night. To be honest it is really one of the best shows on NBC.
  48. Riren
    Feb 5, 2007
    10
    Once again Sorkin gets an amazingly well-casted group, several of whom excel better in their new roles than they have ever done previously in their careers. And once again Sorkin takes a premise (this time the backstage workings at a comedy show, instead of the White House or ESPN), and instead of shooting for realism, embeds them with rich characters who perpetually spout stimulating and Once again Sorkin gets an amazingly well-casted group, several of whom excel better in their new roles than they have ever done previously in their careers. And once again Sorkin takes a premise (this time the backstage workings at a comedy show, instead of the White House or ESPN), and instead of shooting for realism, embeds them with rich characters who perpetually spout stimulating and clever dialogue. Given all of the unlikable and untalented actors running around most of the meaningles shows in primetime, and given how any other channel can give you a gruesome murder, war or rape story, something like this that follows simple plotlines to elicit thoughtprovoking humor is a breath of fresh air. My favorite thing on television right now. Expand
  49. EmJay
    Apr 27, 2007
    9
    What KalvinJ said (and we're not related). Sorkin thinks that because HE is obsessed with his relationship with Kristin Chenoweth, we all are. But the bickering, uncharitable "love" between Harriet and Matt is the lamest part of the show. The inner workings of an SNL-like show are the best. They need to remember that many of us bought the book on the making of Sat. Night Live for What KalvinJ said (and we're not related). Sorkin thinks that because HE is obsessed with his relationship with Kristin Chenoweth, we all are. But the bickering, uncharitable "love" between Harriet and Matt is the lamest part of the show. The inner workings of an SNL-like show are the best. They need to remember that many of us bought the book on the making of Sat. Night Live for this very reason: we want to know what it takes to make a great (formerly great) sketch show. As always, Sorkin is a master at dialogue, but you have to watch on TiVo so you can replay the rapid-fire stuff you missed. Bring it back! Expand
  50. JenniferH
    May 15, 2007
    10
    I loved this show. My husband loved this show. Neither of us knew anything of Sorkins previous works so we had nothing to judge it by except it's own quality. It's just a sad state of television today that intelligent shows are being replaced by reality tv and other mindless dreck. Apparently we're in the minority of people that like shows that are witty and make you think. I loved this show. My husband loved this show. Neither of us knew anything of Sorkins previous works so we had nothing to judge it by except it's own quality. It's just a sad state of television today that intelligent shows are being replaced by reality tv and other mindless dreck. Apparently we're in the minority of people that like shows that are witty and make you think. I'll take that over watching people humiliate themselves any day. NBC dropped the ball on this one. Expand
  51. frant.
    May 27, 2007
    9
    I love the show. The pace is sometimes hard to keep up with.
  52. AndersW
    May 9, 2007
    10
    keep making this show!!!!
  53. Ally
    Jul 26, 2007
    10
    Love this show!
  54. SpirosK
    Jul 29, 2007
    9
    Nice follow-up to the west wing. Lost itsway a bit in the last episodes but still to good one. Waiting for the second season
  55. CharlesB.
    Sep 17, 2007
    10
    the greatest tragedy of the last 5 years of television was that this show didn't make it.
  56. EddieC.
    Jan 16, 2008
    9
    Pretty much as good as it gets for TV fiction.
  57. ChrisC
    Nov 1, 2006
    10
    Best show on TV
  58. DeborahS
    Nov 21, 2006
    10
    I love this show. I hope that the rumours I hear of it's cancellation a re totally wrong! This show has drama, comedy, wit & inteligence and just great to watch
  59. LeslieJ
    Nov 2, 2006
    10
    Finally a show were the humor is not shoved down your throat, but instead makes you think (and then laugh). I hope the network gives this show a chance to catch on. (If Sports Night would have been given the same chance it would still be on the air)
  60. ShellyM
    Oct 12, 2006
    9
    Love it - a little pretentious I admit; but Aaron Sorkin's writing is great, as it was on the West Wing.
  61. Kenna
    Nov 22, 2006
    8
    I love this show...I think it has potential to be one of the most superior shows on tv.
  62. Rob
    Oct 13, 2006
    2
    So I gave this more than a fair shot - what is it now, 4 or 5 weeks? But I'm cutting the line on this one. Never watched West Wing, but did like the American President and occassionally watched Sports Night (though when I did watch it it was ages ago and I think it went over my head). I do like the look of it and I congratulate Matthew Perry for stepping out and doing a great job So I gave this more than a fair shot - what is it now, 4 or 5 weeks? But I'm cutting the line on this one. Never watched West Wing, but did like the American President and occassionally watched Sports Night (though when I did watch it it was ages ago and I think it went over my head). I do like the look of it and I congratulate Matthew Perry for stepping out and doing a great job with a new character. If nothing else I hope this opens up a lot of doors to him. But: 1) It's a skit show - attemping to cram all the posturing and seriousness of government into a comedy show strains your credulity. 2) "Crazy Christians" - ok really, this is to Sorkin what...courage? Attacking a group who a) probably won't watch the show and b) won't really get upset (boycott? - do those even work anymore (ala Disney and the Southern Baptists)). How about courage to attack another religion in which protests result in actual violence (not saying he should but if his point is how "courageous" he is). It seems every episode is only a way for you to get to the "Christian Right" joke or issue. ("How high do my ratings need to stay up so I can go after the Right" - really that would be Peet's concern? - how about she'd be more concerned because her job might be over if she doesn't.) 3) Fast talk - the fact someone talks fast does not inherently mean what you are saying is well written. Not having watched WW I have to only conclude this is a a style of Sorkin's. If you actually pause to listen to what the characters are saying you realize the writing is quite bland, pretentious, and sometimes downright poor. 4) Out of Touch - Honestly this is the key issue this might work if Sorkin tried to actually attach his character's to real issues. This feels like someone "preaching to the choir" (an anology that I'm sure Sorkin wouldn't like) and thus undercuts the "cutting-edge" meliu that he is supposed to represent. Sadly it seems only South Park actually keeps up the ideas of being on the cutting edge and skewing everything from Jesus to Hybrid owners to Scientology. This feels like Sorkin is trying to reclaim some past glory by reveling in liberal pathos and some mystical past where people actually had to fear the religious right. That's the probelm at root - if your only issue to be "relevant" is a strawman - well you aren't the courageous/intelligent/hard-hitting/well-written show that you claim to be. Expand
  63. BChar
    Nov 4, 2006
    10
    Best show for sure
  64. MollyM
    Oct 16, 2006
    0
    Do the critics watch the same show that the rest of us do? I keep hoping I'm being too hard on the show, so I've given it several chances. But, did you see tonight's episode? Matt was talking to Martha and asked her why she was doing the article on the show, "You've covered wars, the white house.., why this show?" "What you're doing is important here, somebody Do the critics watch the same show that the rest of us do? I keep hoping I'm being too hard on the show, so I've given it several chances. But, did you see tonight's episode? Matt was talking to Martha and asked her why she was doing the article on the show, "You've covered wars, the white house.., why this show?" "What you're doing is important here, somebody needs to tell this story.." Or some crap kind of like that. What they're doing is "important"? How is that exactly? It is a comedy skit show! Who is Aaron Sorkin kidding? What an incredible sense of self-importance he must possess... This show just isn't that great, and acts like it is "all that". And that is usually a death knell for a show, but apparently all of the ignorant and easily fooled shallow folk who are watching the show are all as pretentious and self-deluding as Sorkin, because they keep watching and loving the show. That is the tragedy here, Sorkin, you are not saving the world with this show, you aren't making a statement that makes TV better, you are pandering to the very kinds of people that your show claims to be superior to. Keep falling for his pretentious illusion of a good show, Studio 60 fans, you're playing right into the marketing department's hands... Expand
  65. NB
    Nov 6, 2006
    0
    Every time the music comes on during a commercial break I think, oh, my gosh, even the show's music is pretentious! Basically watching the show is like listening to a political rant. I even agree with some of what they are trying to shove down our throats, but, every time they force it on us as offensively as possible it makes me wonder if I need to rethink my own beliefs. Maybe I Every time the music comes on during a commercial break I think, oh, my gosh, even the show's music is pretentious! Basically watching the show is like listening to a political rant. I even agree with some of what they are trying to shove down our throats, but, every time they force it on us as offensively as possible it makes me wonder if I need to rethink my own beliefs. Maybe I shouldn't be politically aligned with pedantic preachy and inaccurate folks like the ones who write and produce this show. I have three words for you about this show... pompous, pushy, and most of all, pretentious. Expand
  66. sheep
    Oct 17, 2006
    10
    I think the show is brilliant
  67. Carol
    Nov 7, 2006
    10
    Has a heart even within all the Hollywood comedy crap - I love this show as much if not even more than West Wing - nice to see so many of the personalities from that show on this one.
  68. /:set\AI
    Oct 18, 2006
    9
    as many have said-not only is the show OBJECTIVELY excellent- just is quite difficult to understand why some don't like it- self-important?!? do you no get how the paradigm has shifted in this country and how shows like the Daily Show/Colbert/ SNL [when it chooses to] have become incredibly relevant and shaping forces in our culture? anyone under 40 gets their news and analysis from as many have said-not only is the show OBJECTIVELY excellent- just is quite difficult to understand why some don't like it- self-important?!? do you no get how the paradigm has shifted in this country and how shows like the Daily Show/Colbert/ SNL [when it chooses to] have become incredibly relevant and shaping forces in our culture? anyone under 40 gets their news and analysis from these shows- they now are the primary social force in America- it is CLEAR that the division of opinion about this show is right down party lines [just like the Daily Show]- blue states love the show and red states hate it- I Expand
  69. April
    Oct 19, 2006
    9
    This show has so much going for it, I hope it stays around as long as West Wing (or longer).
  70. Itsme
    Oct 21, 2006
    10
    This show is excellent! Please watch so that we can keep some quality on TV besides Battlestar Gallactica!
  71. tinad
    Dec 21, 2006
    10
    i absolutely love this show, it has humor, drama,and a peek inside the workings of live tv.
  72. LaurieW
    Dec 22, 2006
    10
    I love this show. The writing is great. The lines are witty and the story is at times moving. Hopefully the writers will tone done the pursuit of love soon but I really hope that this one will be around for a while. If you like West Wing's quick wit you can't miss this show.
  73. KellyJ
    Dec 25, 2006
    10
    Phenomenal. I loved Sorkin's writing in West Wing, and this is just as good or better. Love it!!!
  74. JudyW
    Oct 23, 2006
    6
    I'm so disappointed in this show. It's not a "page turner" like West Wing was. It just doesn't compare. We don't care about the characters or the plot. I think Sorkin and Schlamme should create a new show and a new role for Bradley Whitford as a detective -- or a lawyer--or even a doctor. And we need more appealing characters like "President Bartlet," Matt Santos, I'm so disappointed in this show. It's not a "page turner" like West Wing was. It just doesn't compare. We don't care about the characters or the plot. I think Sorkin and Schlamme should create a new show and a new role for Bradley Whitford as a detective -- or a lawyer--or even a doctor. And we need more appealing characters like "President Bartlet," Matt Santos, Mary-Louise Parker, Emily Proctor,etc,etc...and more dramatic stories, which just isn't possible with this kind of show. Expand
  75. stevenc
    Dec 3, 2006
    9
    well wriiten with a first rate cast
  76. RitaS
    Oct 27, 2006
    9
    Diversity within the writing
  77. larryg
    Oct 28, 2006
    10
    will be a classic, ( i think)
  78. PatriciaE
    Oct 29, 2006
    10
    I find this show well written, fast paced, intelligent and enjoyable! The cast is excellent and the show blends the intelligence of West Wing with the wit and political edge of SNL! Best thing this year on NBC
  79. DB
    Oct 29, 2006
    10
    Yeah - it still needs to find its legs but its far, far better than anything else on TV with the possible exception of Battlestar Galactica. People need to settle down and give it a chance.
  80. MichelleT
    Oct 29, 2006
    10
    Love this show! Can't believe it's suffering for positive public opinion. So smart, funny, intricate. Can't wait for each new episode. Wish people would take their heads out of their arses and recognize good TV when it comes around!
  81. PeterJ
    Oct 29, 2006
    5
    Another reason why credits are full of crap. This show was average at best, and is now cancelled! Thanks for playing. I used to think higher scores on Metacritic was a good thing, now I am convinced otherwise.
  82. LC
    Oct 31, 2006
    10
    Intelligent, Insightful, humorous, intense. Great acting, timely topics Just what we need to enjoy television
  83. GaryM.
    Sep 16, 2006
    5
    To tell the truth, I'd rather watch "30 Rock."
  84. RH
    Sep 16, 2006
    10
    Eh, who wants to watch brilliance? By doing so, you'll come to find that the other television series you enjoy just aren't that great.....
  85. LCarney
    Sep 17, 2006
    10
    Sorkin's usual brilliant writing coupled with outstanding performances from some very talented actors. The pilot was amazing and it looks to get even better.
  86. AmandaC
    Sep 18, 2006
    10
    Love it! Love Aaron Sorkin's witty, fresh, fast writing and glad to see him back on primetime. The cast is perfect and I can't wait to see what they do with this.
  87. AzuraS
    Sep 18, 2006
    10
    Amazing Show, great acting and storyline!
  88. BrianA
    Sep 18, 2006
    10
    A worthy successor to The West Wing!
  89. ShawnW
    Sep 18, 2006
    10
    Wow...very impressed with Sorkin's new effort. I was never a West Wing fan, but loved Sports Night.
  90. justins
    Sep 19, 2006
    10
    great show...better not cancel
  91. AliceP
    Sep 19, 2006
    10
    Thought it was excellent! Witty, clever, and fast paced. Good music, too.
  92. AnitaM
    Sep 19, 2006
    9
    The writing was superior. I love the 2 male leads. I'll keep watching. Hope they can keep the quality up.
  93. GlennS
    Sep 22, 2006
    10
    Excellent TV.......With so much to skewer, it will take a few seasons before they run out of interesting ideas.
  94. CalebC
    Sep 24, 2006
    9
    The best pilot so far this year. The only minor downfall to the pilot was when they were making fun of christians other than that this shows perfect.
  95. MiguelC
    Sep 25, 2006
    10
    just loved it!!!
  96. thecody
    Sep 25, 2006
    5
    super pretentious. really does come through on the "snl meets the west wing" promise.
  97. kathym
    Sep 26, 2006
    10
    Loved it! Everything!!!
  98. BenM
    Sep 26, 2006
    0
    The acting is more like reading. There is such a democratic agenda. When do a producer and writer command a room full of press? Totally unbelievable. When is doing drugs in Hollywood a big deal? Let's get this straight, every writer and producer does blow on a daily basis and everyone knows it. To make it seem like it is a big deal is a sham. Network TV is a dying dinosaur and this The acting is more like reading. There is such a democratic agenda. When do a producer and writer command a room full of press? Totally unbelievable. When is doing drugs in Hollywood a big deal? Let's get this straight, every writer and producer does blow on a daily basis and everyone knows it. To make it seem like it is a big deal is a sham. Network TV is a dying dinosaur and this show is living proof. You want to see good tv go to HBO and showtime. Expand
  99. AustinR
    Sep 28, 2006
    8
    Has potential and is more engaging than 98percent of the schlock out there now.
  100. HarryD
    Sep 29, 2006
    9
    Deft writing. Well-crafted scenes. Likable actors.
Metascore
75

Generally favorable reviews - based on 33 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 24 out of 33
  2. Negative: 1 out of 33
  1. There are more than a few well-made dramas this season, but "Studio 60" -- with its intelligent dialogue, ironic humor, brilliant acting and Schlamme's inspired direction -- lays claim to being the most exciting new show of the season.
  2. Sorkin brings the same intensity and political sensibilities to the story.
  3. Here's hoping that the strong whiff of sanctimony in the pilot of "Studio 60" is blown away by fresh air in future episodes.