HBO | Release Date: August 28, 2005
CRITIC SCORE DISTRIBUTION
70
METASCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 43 Critic Reviews
Positive:
31
Mixed:
10
Negative:
2
Watch Now
Buy on
Stream On
91
The Detroit NewsMekeisha Madden TobyJan 28, 2014
Season 1 Review: [A] captivating and undeniable classic. [26 Aug 2005, p.2E]
90
Pittsburgh Post-GazetteRob OwenJan 28, 2014
Season 1 Review: Rome wasn't built in a day, the saying goes, and that applies to this show, too. It's a slow build that requires some effort on the part of viewers, but after the first three episodes, I was hooked. [28 Aug 2005, p.TV-3]
90
Miami HeraldGlenn GarvinJan 28, 2014
Season 1 Review: A wild, careening chariot ride of a new series that debuts tonight. It's like The Sopranos in togas, except without even the faintest twinge of conscience. [28 Aug 2005, p.8]
80
Detroit Free PressMike DuffyJan 28, 2014
Season 1 Review: Rome delivers high-quality television bursting with grimy, down-to-earth life. [26 Aug 2005]
80
Boston GlobeMatthew GilbertJan 28, 2014
Season 1 Review: No, it's not "groundbreaking," as HBO calls its programming. And I doubt it will give the ratings-slipping channel its much-needed hit. But it will probably find a small, loyal, "Deadwood"-size audience that enjoys a good serial melodrama charged up by a villainess named Atia who turns mothering into something akin to pimping. [26 Aug 2005, p.D1]
80
The Globe and Mail (Toronto)Catherine Dawson MarchJan 28, 2014
Season 1 Review: It demands your attention to keep the many plot threads from tangling, and at times requires a strong stomach, but you never know what to expect next, and that beats the ridiculous reality series seen on every other channel. Give me gore over gonzo any day. [27 Aug 2005, p.8]
75
San Diego Union-TribuneRobert P. LaurenceJan 28, 2014
Season 1 Review: The finished product is passably entertaining, intermittently involving, tolerably well acted by an all-English cast, and offers enough kinky sex and graphic violence to satisfy all but the most depraved tastes. [22 Aug 2005, p.D-1]
75
Boston HeraldMark A. PerigardJan 28, 2014
Season 1 Review: Less perverse than ``I, Claudius,'' more entertaining than ABC's toga twister ``Empire,'' Rome gets off to an uneven start. [25 Aug 2005, p.47]
75
San Jose Mercury News/Contra Costa TimesChuck BarneyJan 28, 2014
Season 1 Review: Whether Rome attains that stature is entirely up to the Nielsen gods, but one thing is certain: The series is a lusty, violent, rollicking saga that is sure to seize plenty of initial attention, if not for its ravishing production values, then for its rampant depiction of ancient-style decadence and debauchery. [27 Aug 2005, p.F4]
70
Denver PostJoanne OstrowJan 28, 2014
Season 1 Review: While the first hour is daunting, the series offers a terrific villainess who also has a knack for humor. [28 Aug 2005, p.F-03]
67
Dallas Morning NewsEd BarkJan 28, 2014
Season 1 Review: Amply seasoned with treachery, lechery, debauchery, depravity, nudity and infidelity, HBO's Rome also tends to fall victim to filmmaking's cardinal sin - tedium. [28 Aug 2005, p.3]
63
Season 2 Review: As in season 1, the acting is rich and lusty, with no costume-drama fustiness. [15 Jan 2007, p.33]
60
Chicago TribuneSid SmithJan 28, 2014
Season 1 Review: Rome is slow, ponderous, terribly uneven and dense, more "The Wire" than "The Sopranos" draped in togas. But those who stick it out may well be seduced by the series' cumulative effort to create a complete, if repulsive, world. This is a bold cable offering, always a little more than sword-and-sandal kitsch and rarely, if ever, kind. [26 Aug 2005, p.C1]
60
Washington PostTom ShalesJan 28, 2014
Season 1 Review: There are, in fact, simply too many characters chasing each other up and down the seven hills, and viewers who try to keep track are in for maddening frustration. If only people would address one another by name once in a blue moon, that would help a little. [28 Aug 2005, p.N01]
40
Cleveland Plain DealerMark DawidziakJan 28, 2014
Season 1 Review: Many aspects of the 12-part Rome might leave you cold. While certainly impressive in scope and scale, HBO’s awkward stab at a series is being made with a programming weapon that’s often blunt, dull and unwieldy... Where Rome gets tripped up is in the uneven performances and lackluster writing. This is what truly causes the fall of this particular Roman empire. [28 Aug 2005, p.J1]
40
Philadelphia InquirerJonathan StormJan 28, 2014
Season 1 Review: All this adds up to $100 million worth of eye-popping bravura on the screen, but not a lot of cash to examine what goes on beneath the surface of the characters. One of the most extravagant soap operas in TV history doesn't even supply the fun of The Bold and the Beautiful. Though stuffed with stupid scenes, it lacks the stupid surprises that can make more traditional soaps so addictive. [28 Aug 2005, p.H01]
25
Chicago Sun-TimesDoug ElfmanJan 28, 2014
Season 1 Review: Rome is so jam-packed with Caesar and pals, it feels like a show that high school teachers would ask students to watch, if it weren't for all the whore sex, rape and consensual carnality. It very well might take an apt pupil to follow this cinematic jigsaw puzzle. [24 Aug 2005, p.55]
20
NewsdayDiane WertsJan 28, 2014
Season 1 Review: Calling Rome a crushing disappointment would be accurate but too forgiving of its sordidly cockamamy fixations. Brutality and nudity rise in direct proportion to unpersuasive storytelling. Finding someone, anyone, to care about amid all this shock-value Sturm und Drang swiftly becomes an enervating chore. [26 Aug 2005, p.B33]