FX | Release Date: July 22, 2003
CRITIC SCORE DISTRIBUTION
72
METASCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 95 Critic Reviews
Positive:
69
Mixed:
20
Negative:
6
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
100
Chicago Sun-TimesDoug ElfmanJan 21, 2014
Season 4 Review: If you're a woman and you want to see a naked male butt, watch Nip/Tuck. If you're a man who values the naked female form, Nip/Tuck is for you...Those two sentences are outlandish. But I'm doing what I can to draw your attention to one of the most exhilarating shows on TV...Nip/Tuck is fun. It's sexy. It's the opposite of sexy. It's existential. It's bloody disgusting. And it's the only series on TV now that deserves to inherit the fans of "Six Feet Under." [4 Sept 2006, p.31]
100
The Detroit NewsMekeisha Madden TobyJan 21, 2014
Season 4 Review: Smart without being smug, Nip/Tuck is surgically altered television perfection. [5 Sept 2006, p.5D]
100
Boston GlobeMatthew GilbertJan 21, 2014
Season 3 Review: Nip/ Tuck also remains gorgeously sick...The makers of Nip/ Tuck never keep it simple, which is simply excellent. [20 Sept 2005, p.C6]
100
San Diego Union-TribuneRobert P. LaurenceJan 21, 2014
Season 2 Review: One of TV's most adult, provocative, outrageous and thought-provoking dramas -- and the bloodiest and most sex-drenched -- Nip/Tuck doesn't just push the envelope, it heaves it clear over the cliff. In an age when the FCC's rabbit-ears are more attuned than ever to what it considers issues of "decency," creator-producer Ryan Murphy and the FX channel are either incredibly brave or impossibly foolhardy. [22 June 2004, p.E-1]
100
Dallas Morning NewsEd BarkJan 21, 2014
Season 1 Review: Nip/Tuck delivers its jolts within the context of an intelligent script underscored by first-rate performances. [20 July 2003, p.3]
91
Houston ChronicleAnn HodgesJan 21, 2014
Season 1 Review: Nip/Tuck is what the doctor ordered to put a little wicked dramedy in a silly sitcom-ed out TV season. [20 July 2003, p.3]
90
Seattle Post-IntelligencerMelanie McFarlandJan 21, 2014
Season 3 Review: Beneath this skin is one-of-a-kind daring television that explores the complexities of human relationships with an unparalleled intelligence, sensitivity, appropriate level of fun - Joan Rivers dropped by last season, for example - and, when it is warranted, menace. [20 Sept 2005, p.E1]
90
Cleveland Plain DealerMark DawidziakJan 21, 2014
Season 2 Review: If you have a strong enough stomach to get through the yuck-and-yikes surgical procedures, the dramatic rewards are great. If you prefer shows with an edge and an attitude, make your appointment with Miami partners Sean McNamara (Dylan Walsh) and Christian Troy (Julian McMahon)...And if you like your television served up with wit, intelligence and a bit of daring, you won't have much to say if someone asks, "Tell me what you don't like about Nip/Tuck. "[22 June 2004, p.E1]
90
VarietyBrian LowryJan 21, 2014
Season 2 Review: One of TV's premiere dramas --- a rarity whose darkest moments have a way of lingering in the mind. Such depth and humanity might be unexpected from a show that clearly revels in every four-letter word and exposed cheek, yet as the series so often demonstrates, appearances can be deceiving. [22 June 2004, p.10]
90
Deseret NewsScott D. PierceJan 21, 2014
Season 1 Review: The new series Nip/Tuck is gross, disgusting and vile. And I like it. A lot...If you can get past the ick factor, Nip/Tuck is really a character drama that recalls "Six Feet Under" or "The Shield" -- powerful stuff that's not just gross, it's engrossing. [21 July 2003, p.C08]
90
Denver PostJoanne OstrowJan 19, 2014
Season 1 Review: The overly gruesome operating room moments are best glimpsed through shielded eyes. The rest of the drama draws viewers in with rich characters, a breathless pace, a refusal to pigeonhole good guys versus bad guys, thoughtful observations about family life and midlife relationships, and intriguing casting. [22 July 2003, p.F-01]
90
Kansas City StarAaron BarnhartJan 19, 2014
Season 1 Review: The core of the show is its characters, who are vividly drawn and well cast, and its tangle of provocative story lines. [22 July 2003, p.E8]
90
Baltimore SunDavid ZurawikJan 19, 2014
Season 1 Review: I like the way this series cuts to the moral bone and ties so much of the evil men and women do to our culture's excessive materialism, commercialism and obsession with appearances. [22 July 2003, p.1E]
88
Boston HeraldMark A. PerigardJan 21, 2014
Season 3 Review: Believe the hype: In its third season, Nip/Tuc' finds new ways to be shocking, brazen and gross-out wrenching. [20 Sept 2005, p.37]
88
Boston HeraldSarah RodmanJan 21, 2014
Season 2 Review: Nip/Tuck is unabashed in its portrayal of the flawed ways people conduct the private sides of their lives and how the professional bleeds over in unexpected ways. [21 June 2004, p.43]
88
San Diego Union-TribuneRobert P. LaurenceJan 21, 2014
Season 1 Review: For the second straight time, the cable channel has rejuvenated a stale, weary TV format, taking a genre that appeared to be staggering under the debilitating effects of old age and overuse and giving it new life. [20 July 2003, p.TV-6]
83
Houston ChronicleMike McDanielJan 21, 2014
Season 2 Review: This year, the ethical standards remain low and the ick factor high. [20 June 2004, p.8]
83
Seattle Post-IntelligencerMelanie McFarlandJan 21, 2014
Season 1 Review: Disturbing and morbid in presentation and humor, Nip/Tuck isn't for the squeamish, and it isn't pretty. But what we saw was alluring and smart enough to, perhaps, pick up the pace on Tuesday nights. [22 July 2003, p.E6]
80
VarietyBrian LowryJan 21, 2014
Season 4 Review: It's reassuring to see the program refocused and mostly back on track as it opens its fourth season, which finds new torments with which to plague its central trio, as well as a plethora of showy guest stars in deliciously perverse roles. [31 Aug 2006, p.6]
80
NewsdayNoel HolstonJan 21, 2014
Season 2 Review: Nip/Tuck is all about appearances, but it also has something to say. [21 June 2004, p.C01]
80
San Jose Mercury News/Contra Costa TimesChuck BarneyJan 21, 2014
Season 2 Review: Yes, this highly addictive -- and often painfully funny -- soap can trample all over your comfort zone, but that can be a good thing if you give it some slack. It is rough and visceral and intense and defiantly alive -- commendable qualities, considering how so many banal (and derivative) TV dramas these days carry the mind-numbing effect of pre-op anesthesia. [22 June 2004, p.D01]
80
Orlando SentinelHal BoedekerJan 21, 2014
Season 1 Review: Nip/Tuck confirms that FX, after HBO, is presenting the most-adventurous series in cable these days. The surgery to deliver this energetic series has been, all in all, a rousing success.
80
Newark Star-LedgerAlan SepinwallJan 21, 2014
Season 1 Review: Nip/Tuck is the right show at the right time, a pointed, funny attack on the body biz and another winner from the cable channel that brought us "The Shield" and "Lucky." [21 July 2003, p.25]
80
St. Louis Post-DispatchGail PenningtonJan 21, 2014
Season 1 Review: Beyond the "yikes" factor, Nip/Tuck tells compelling stories about its troubled characters. [22 July 2003, p.E1]
80
Miami HeraldGlenn GarvinJan 19, 2014
Season 1 Review: Suburban rage may not be pretty, but in Nip/Tuck, it's always funny. [22 July 2003, p.3E]
80
Philadelphia InquirerJonathan StormJan 19, 2014
Season 1 Review: The show's a keeper - daring, imaginative and provocative - but it must be careful not to overheat in the long haul and burn out its audience. [22 July 2003, p.F1]
80
Arizona RepublicBill GoodykoontzJan 19, 2014
Season 1 Review: One hopes viewers don't get too caught up in Nip/Tuck's sometimes over-the-top graphic images and miss the beauty of the series underneath. [22 July 2003, p.1E]
75
Boston HeraldMark A. PerigardJan 21, 2014
Season 4 Review: If their melodrama isn't always gripping, Nip/Tuck rushes in an array of guest stars as distractions. [5 Sept 2006, p.36]
75
Detroit Free PressMike DuffyJan 21, 2014
Season 4 Review: At the very least, it's the best-made guilty pleasure on television. [5 Sept 2006, p.2]
75
The Detroit NewsBrian FisherJan 19, 2014
Season 1 Review: Nip/Tuck isn't perfect, but with its flawed, fumbling and very human cast of characters, it's a cut above the usual TV drama. [22 July 2003, p.5E]
70
Chicago TribuneMaureen RyanJan 21, 2014
Season 4 Review: That sense of saucy transgression married to surprisingly effective character development -- the magic formula of the first two seasons -- is a bit wobbly this year, but Nip/Tuck is more or less back on track, and the Carver is thankfully nowhere in sight. [5 Sept 2006, p.1]
70
Dallas Morning NewsEd BarkJan 21, 2014
Season 2 Review: Had enough? Or want more? Nip/Tuck still can be gripping, gratifying drama when it's not trying so hard to be either salacious or capital Q quirky. But it's not off to the great start of last summer despite the presence of esteemed thespian Vanessa Redgrave in the second season's initial three episodes. [20 June 2004, p.3]
70
Deseret NewsScott D. PierceJan 21, 2014
Season 2 Review: Nip/Tuck could be equally effective as a drama without being anywhere near as graphic as it is. [22 June 2004]
70
Pittsburgh Post-GazetteRob OwenJan 21, 2014
Season 2 Review: Still a claustrophobic show, and some of the uncomfortable stories from last year -- especially teenager Matt (John Hensley) and his involvement in a hit and run -- return, but a lot of the themes are at least a little more palatable and thought-provoking. [22 June 2004, p.B-1]
63
Chicago Sun-TimesPhil RosenthalJan 19, 2014
Season 1 Review: An uneven series that, while sometimes hard to watch, is also hard to resist. It doesn't make you feel good for watching it, though. Joely Richardson is solid as a long-suffering wife, but creator Ryan Murphy tries way too hard to juice up his story. [22 July 2003, p.35]
60
Denver PostJoanne OstrowJan 21, 2014
Season 4 Review: If you can get past the showy physicality, there's real meat here...Unfortunately, the series is frequently its own worst enemy...Every so often, (it feels like every few scenes), the visuals overwhelm the content, and it's clear the producers are intent on using every bit of license that cable networks allow. Story is overwhelmed by effects. It all becomes "deeply superficial," without the ironic twist. [1 Sept 2006, p.F-01]
60
Seattle Post-IntelligencerMelanie McFarlandJan 21, 2014
Season 2 Review: Skin deep? A tad predictable? Certainly. But Nip/Tuck is nonetheless a TV addiction. We watch, mesmerized by the series' cool surface appeal and the nasty ooze pulsating beneath. We grimace when we should, and when we shouldn't, and at the end we, the Nip/Tuck addicts, want more. [22 June 2004, p.E1]
60
Arizona RepublicBill GoodykoontzJan 21, 2014
Season 2 Review: It's not so instantly compelling, particularly for the uninitiated. [22 June 2004, p.6E]
50
Newark Star-LedgerAlan SepinwallJan 21, 2014
Season 4 Review: Murphy's writing has never been especially fond of subtlety - give him a fly to kill, and he'll ask for a brick of C4 - but this version of Nip/Tuck more closely resembles the show the fans fell in love with instead of the one they thought they wanted with The Carver story. [5 Sept 2006, p.27]
50
Seattle Post-IntelligencerMelanie McFarlandJan 21, 2014
Season 4 Review: Nip/Tuck is aiming for profundity again, as far as that goes. At one point the series catch phrase said something about being more than skin deep, but I'm not sure the scalpel even scratches the fatty layer anymore. Understand that Nip/Tuck was never about adventurous quality or exploring new frontiers in emotional depth. It's just the handsomest, indecently pleasurable soap opera television can crank out, and a reliable supplier of muscular butt shots. [5 Sept 2006, p.E1]
50
Chicago TribuneSteve JohnsonJan 21, 2014
Season 2 Review: Back for a second season after receiving way too much praise in its first, the plastic-surgery drama Nip/Tuck continues to be as garish as its Miami setting. [22 June 2004, p.7]
50
Cleveland Plain DealerMark DawidziakJan 21, 2014
Season 1 Review: A mixed-bag hour that, in the parlance of the cosmetic-surgery world, could use a little work. [22 July 2003, p.E1]
50
Boston GlobeMatthew GilbertJan 19, 2014
Season 1 Review: The show digs into the issues too quickly, and with too much intensity, and the drama suffers. [22 July 2003, p.E1]
40
Philadelphia Daily NewsEllen GrayJan 21, 2014
Season 2 Review: Whatever my squeamishness, however, my real problem with Nip/Tuck isn't with the surgeries but with the writers, who seem determined to remind us that beauty is only skin deep by taking very pretty people and making them do very ugly things...Over and over. [21 June 2004, p.35]
40
Philadelphia Daily NewsEllen GrayJan 19, 2014
Season 1 Review: I'm afraid the show, like beauty itself, is only skin deep. [22 July 2003, p.40]
30
Newark Star-LedgerAlan SepinwallJan 21, 2014
Season 3 Review: For a show that's so scornful of our national obsession with beauty, Nip/Tuck seems awfully comfortable staying skin deep. Its wild collage of sexual and surgical plot twists creates the appearance of meaning, but very rarely does the show hold up to close scrutiny. In the moment, it's dazzling, but when you step away from the set, it's oddly forgettable. [20 Sept 2005, p.33]
30
Newark Star-LedgerAlan SepinwallJan 21, 2014
Season 2 Review: If FX's other signature drama "The Shield" is a fine example of how cable's relaxed content restrictions can lead to more compelling drama, Nip/Tuck is a symbol of that freedom run amok. "The Shield" is heavy on shock value, but those shocks are there to serve some kind of larger purpose. When the Nip/Tuck writers throw in something raunchy or disgusting, it's simply because they can. [21 June 2004, p.27]
25
Boston HeraldMonica CollinsJan 19, 2014
Season 1 Review: There are no characters to care about in Nip-Tuck. It seems their motivations are purely hollow. We love Tony Soprano - even when he cheats on his wife or whacks an enemy - because he reveals his own vulnerability and tragic flaws. But this Nip-Tuck bunch are vacant louts - "ER" meets "WWE SmackDown!" [22 July 2003, p.39]