Legend of the Seeker

:

Season 1
Season #: 2, 1
User Score
7.3

Generally favorable reviews- based on 163 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 118 out of 163
  2. Mixed: 9 out of 163
  3. Negative: 36 out of 163
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Buy on
Stream On
Stream On

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

view
per page
  1. LordVhannar
    Feb 26, 2019
    10
    The best series ever. Please we want more. it's incomplete and need to be finished the very good work. Please think about it. For the good of the fans.
  2. night4
    Jul 10, 2016
    7
    The first season is watchable, if nothing really special. Let's not judge the show by how well it lived up to your expectations from the books. Let's judge it by what's there, and it's entertaining.
  3. MissSquito
    Feb 6, 2016
    6
    I am new to the show (as in I have seen the pilot), but I think it might be helpful to write a review of my initial impressions. You can tell that the show is restrictive in budget because the graphics are not the greatest quality. I however am spoiled with shows of a higher quality on a regular basis.
    I will not rate the show yet though. I can see some promise with the characters, and    I am new to the show (as in I have seen the pilot), but I think it might be helpful to write a review of my initial impressions. You can tell that the show is restrictive in budget because the graphics are not the greatest quality. I however am spoiled with shows of a higher quality on a regular basis.
    I will not rate the show yet though. I can see some promise with the characters, and the acting is good enough. I think with some development that I can get to really enjoy the show. Like I said, it is low budget. Maybe that will change with future episodes/seasons? I have not read the books it is said to be based on, but reading the reviews of those who are expecting the show to be about that, the fans of them are highly disappointed. If you have read the books I suggest you look at this as a separate series.
    I may rate this show later on and write a new review when I have watched it enough to decide on character development, plot line, plot twists, ect.    … Expand
  4. notthemessiah
    Sep 28, 2015
    1
    Being a fan of the Sword and Sorcery genre and having heard good things about this series I decided to see for myself. I was bitterly disappointed. The acting is appalling and to call the storyline cheesy is being far too kind. The writers seem to think that if the cast keep repeating buzz words like 'Seeker' and 'Prophecy' it will somehow add weight to the storyline - it doesn't, it justBeing a fan of the Sword and Sorcery genre and having heard good things about this series I decided to see for myself. I was bitterly disappointed. The acting is appalling and to call the storyline cheesy is being far too kind. The writers seem to think that if the cast keep repeating buzz words like 'Seeker' and 'Prophecy' it will somehow add weight to the storyline - it doesn't, it just serves to make an already tacky series even less compelling. It doesn't even have the saving grace of being so bad it's good. Avoid this dismal series at all costs unless you enjoy disappointment.… Expand
  5. SiAScORCH
    Nov 4, 2014
    8
    I found this show to be really entertaining and being that I like Wizard stuff and medieval times it was only a bonus. I enjoyed this show from start to finish and am rather annoyed that they didn't make a season three. It's just an interesting TV show and it has action as well as some suspense and of course romance. This is quite off subject, but one thing I'm glad I watched this show forI found this show to be really entertaining and being that I like Wizard stuff and medieval times it was only a bonus. I enjoyed this show from start to finish and am rather annoyed that they didn't make a season three. It's just an interesting TV show and it has action as well as some suspense and of course romance. This is quite off subject, but one thing I'm glad I watched this show for was for Bridget Regan. I would say with her being so beautiful I would of likely finished watching the show just for her being in it. With that being said though it wasn't the case because I enjoyed the show. So if you like wizard and medieval times then this is definitely a show you should watch as I'm sure you won't be disappointed.… Expand
  6. anjar6
    Feb 16, 2013
    10
    honestly i have always watch tv series and when i watched this i completely fell in love with it. i just heard about this show 4 months ago so that shows how poorly advertized it was and when i found out it was canceled, i could not believe it. i was devastated. i still watch it everyday praying they will make new seasons. this show is amaaing. if you watch atleast the first 5 episodeshonestly i have always watch tv series and when i watched this i completely fell in love with it. i just heard about this show 4 months ago so that shows how poorly advertized it was and when i found out it was canceled, i could not believe it. i was devastated. i still watch it everyday praying they will make new seasons. this show is amaaing. if you watch atleast the first 5 episodes you'll see for yourself. they did so good improving the effects and making the show great in every way. i really hope people take my advice and watch it for awhile. i can garented you will love it and please give this inspiring show the rating it deserves!!!!!… Expand
  7. ChrisPurser
    Dec 11, 2012
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Much to my pain, I have watched the entire of the first season of this show. Having read all the books and adoring the beautiful story inside, I was hugely disappointed at the amount of 'made up' parts. I found that just in the first few episodes that they had completely made up the story, it seemed the only correct things were the names of the characters. I mean nothing against the actors in this show, they in fact did a reasonable job, despite the failure in the story. I am just going to share a few of the things that ticked me off about this show: First off, Denna the Mord-Sith wasn't killed that way, she was killed by Richard, out of love, and she stayed dead. All of the Confessors that are in the show should already be dead. One episode revolved around a kid who could read minds, that never happened! Jensen Rahl only comes into the story in the eighth book, not the first, plus she is older than about twelve. The ageil, the weapon a Mord-Sith uses is supposed to be able to fit inside your ear, and it doesn't make you travel back in time. The whole part where Kahlan has Darken Rahl's child is utter **** the ending of the story does not go like that at all. What actually happens is much more fitting and actually enhances the story tenfold. Faith of the Fallen is my favorite book, and I sincerely hope that they haven't/don't make the movie ruin that book too. If anyone is reading this and thinking that I am just rambling on an complaining too much, then you may be right. But I beg anyone who is reading this to go and read the books, they are so much better than the movies. In the books you are told of dragons that play a pivotal part in the story, when they aren't even put into the movie. The books deal with romance on a whole new level compared to the movies. If you read this and think I'm rambling, go read the books. If you've read the books and still think I'm rambling, then you haven't paid attention of understood the full complexity of the story.… Expand
  8. fenikkusuuk
    May 9, 2012
    10
    How long are we going to be burdened with critics that only care for mainstream material devoid of imagination! This is an absolute outrage! Because of them good shows that so so many people love get cancelled! We allow them to stuff us very neatly into little mainstream boxes! Enough of this!
    Legend of the Seeker was a great adventurous romp through the gorgeous countryside of New    How long are we going to be burdened with critics that only care for mainstream material devoid of imagination! This is an absolute outrage! Because of them good shows that so so many people love get cancelled! We allow them to stuff us very neatly into little mainstream boxes! Enough of this!
    Legend of the Seeker was a great adventurous romp through the gorgeous countryside of New Zealand. It had EVERY aspect which should have led it to great success, a quest, an adventure, a forbidden romance, a common man turned unlikely hero, and oh my gosh good strong morals and a system of honor ( remember those?). There were several things that ultimately led to the show's cancellation. The Syfy channel (shame on you Syfy!!!) aired it in the U.S. at a very late time that made it difficult for the average working person to watch. Critics who gave CSI and Desperate Housewives glowing reviews also reviewed LotS. Clearly the Science fiction/ fantasy genre was not their thing and they were more suited to assessing mainstream material, which is still either cops and robbers or insipid comedy (though Desperate housewives and Weeds were a little more intellectually stimulating than the common slap stick garbage that we usually have to deal with) Problem is though is that there really is room for it all, there really is room enough to make everyone happy and if you like Family Guy and American Dad and Futurama then you should get to enjoy that too. BUT the people who like fantasy and Sci fi should also be able to enjoy their shows. Time and again this is not the case and we find that scifi/fantasy is shipped for yet another cops and robbers. It's been done people! We have more than enough crime dramas! It is time for a different system! Critics who like specific genres should comment on their own and shows shouldn't be pulled from scifi-ers!
    Honestly the acting was good. I think about how many Star Trek series I have watched and how the first few episodes the acting was actually weak and it took a while for the actors to get into their roles. Really you only see that during the first episode of LotS. The scenery is amazing! This series if given another chance by a responsible carrier instead of Syfy, in this world today where we all certainly feel the need for a hero would likely be a brilliant success. It should also be noted that part of the failure involved, was actually because of the stalwart fans of Terry Goodkind's series, The Sword of Truth. Fans of the series were disappointed that the tv series was not an exact replica of the novels, and apparently didn't read the fine print that said "BASED ON" Terry Goodkind's The Sword of Truth series. It is sad that this series was cancelled and there are still millions of hardcore fans that would like it to come back!    … Expand
  9. Jeffers
    Jan 31, 2012
    10
    Possibly the most fun series I have ever watched, something for the whole family and everyone can enjoy it.
    It may seem a bit cheese to some at first, but it really grows on you especially when you get to know all of the characters
  10. Matty_K
    Jan 15, 2012
    9
    I love this show! If you are into great story line and magic and sword and shield style entertainment, this show is for you. If you are into special affects and high budget films, perhaps not. In my opinion it is very entertaining and I have to keep watching
  11. MovieCritic
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    READ THE BOOKS BEFORE YOU WATCH THIS OR YOU WILL THINK ITS A COPY OF DIFFERENT THINGS. Truthfully I read half of the book series before I watched this. Some of it does not happen in the book and that is totally understandable. But if you read the books everything would become more clear and all of it is Terry Goodkind's original work, not a copy of Lord of the Rings or Xena. I still likeREAD THE BOOKS BEFORE YOU WATCH THIS OR YOU WILL THINK ITS A COPY OF DIFFERENT THINGS. Truthfully I read half of the book series before I watched this. Some of it does not happen in the book and that is totally understandable. But if you read the books everything would become more clear and all of it is Terry Goodkind's original work, not a copy of Lord of the Rings or Xena. I still like the books more but the TV show is very pleasing as well. The characters do a great job of acting out their parts and the plot follows the book which I like. Honestly they could of done a better job at explaining the plot and what was going on but if you read the series first everything is crystal clear, well of course some things are changed but most are the same.… Expand
  12. Drehj
    Nov 20, 2011
    8
    A series with the quality and style of Xena and Hercules today seems outdated and for that alone it gets an 8! Especially after watching series such as the game of thrones, mad men, walking dead, dexter, breaking bad etc. If i were a very strict critic, i would have given it even less for that , BUT i enjoyed the story. However the series manages to deliver! Especially the second seasonA series with the quality and style of Xena and Hercules today seems outdated and for that alone it gets an 8! Especially after watching series such as the game of thrones, mad men, walking dead, dexter, breaking bad etc. If i were a very strict critic, i would have given it even less for that , BUT i enjoyed the story. However the series manages to deliver! Especially the second season does great job! The story is great and although av oiding romanve and "virginity" theme gets annoying at parts, overall the series manages to immerse you in this fantasy world. For sure it made me want to read the books!… Expand
  13. jfox960
    Oct 4, 2011
    9
    Slow start and the acting in the first season is sub par but the second season is where LotS really starts to take off. Plot is more intense, acting greatly improves, and the introduction of Tabrett Bethell (Cara) bring this show to a whole new level. Tabrett Bethell (Cara) quickly became my favorite character and really filled the missing piece for me that made this show as enjoyable asSlow start and the acting in the first season is sub par but the second season is where LotS really starts to take off. Plot is more intense, acting greatly improves, and the introduction of Tabrett Bethell (Cara) bring this show to a whole new level. Tabrett Bethell (Cara) quickly became my favorite character and really filled the missing piece for me that made this show as enjoyable as it was. It is really a shame that most of the critic reviews are based on the first few episodes of the show instead of watching it through. 54 is not a fair score for this wonderful and entertaining show. Just push past the first season and get ready to enjoy the second as it is far and above better than the first.

    Be sure to try and watch the show on a big screen with surround sound. This show has some great elements from other iconic movies and shows (The Matrix, 300, etc) and a nice entertainment center really helps make this show shine.

    Hope you enjoy the show as much as I did. Here's to hoping the 3rd season magically will happen!    … Expand
  14. obsessivemuch1
    Sep 10, 2010
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I loved this show even though I ended up watching after it was done! The characters, the actors, and the plot totally took me in. The adventures in the show are surprising and not all fluff. The relationship between Kahlan and Ricard is heart breaking, enticing and romantic. The different plot twists and turns keep you at the edge of your seat the whole time. Any scifi or fantasy fan should give the show a try! Try out this show and don't let it die out! If you become a fan help in the fight for season 3!… Expand
  15. b0rea1is
    Sep 7, 2010
    3
    When I first saw this show, I thought I was watching a rerun of "Xena: the warrior princess". To my surprise, it was a show I had never seen before. I soon discovered this show was like a smorgasbord of different scifi/fantasy shows all mixed together with a LOTR backdrop.

    What's with the "Sisters of the Dark"? They're supposed to be these formidable sorceresses with greatly increased    When I first saw this show, I thought I was watching a rerun of "Xena: the warrior princess". To my surprise, it was a show I had never seen before. I soon discovered this show was like a smorgasbord of different scifi/fantasy shows all mixed together with a LOTR backdrop.

    What's with the "Sisters of the Dark"? They're supposed to be these formidable sorceresses with greatly increased powers. However, in the show, they're little more than cannon fodder. Very reminiscent of stormtroopers from the SW universe.

    I would not waste your time with this show or the book.    … Expand
  16. bstm300
    Aug 22, 2010
    10
    The actors did a great job of acting out a modified version of Wizard's First Rule. For example, Craig Horner (Richard Cypher) couldn't have been more humble or witty than he was the book. Bruce Spence (Zed) also didn't disappoint. He was able to maintain a level of humor and mystery that made his role as Wizard indispensable to the plot. Still, the series would have been meaninglessThe actors did a great job of acting out a modified version of Wizard's First Rule. For example, Craig Horner (Richard Cypher) couldn't have been more humble or witty than he was the book. Bruce Spence (Zed) also didn't disappoint. He was able to maintain a level of humor and mystery that made his role as Wizard indispensable to the plot. Still, the series would have been meaningless without the stellar performances of Bridget Regan (Kahlan) and Tabrett Bethell (Cara). To be honest, I thought Tabrett was a much better actor. I always thought her reactions and emotions were much more convincing than Bridget's. In sum, it was an excellent series replete with suspense, great fantasy action, and memorable moments. Remember, don't judge it for not following the book to the t. Enjoy it while considering they had to modify the storyline to accommodate a tight budget and younger audiences.… Expand
  17. deming_1444
    Aug 21, 2010
    8
    One of the best fantasy series I've seen so far. It even influenced me to read the "Sword of Truth" series of books by Terry Goodkind from which the series is based! The storyline makes up for any shortcomings in the production values (props, cast, special effects, etc). This series should be given another season.
  18. AngelB
    May 21, 2010
    3
    To say that the Legend of the Seeker was "adapted" from Terry Goodkind's Sword of Truth series is a lie. It would be better to say that only the characters' graphic descriptions and world settings had been excellently depicted in the television series but the same certainly couldn't be said for the novels' essence. As an avid fan of the novels, I am greatly dismayed To say that the Legend of the Seeker was "adapted" from Terry Goodkind's Sword of Truth series is a lie. It would be better to say that only the characters' graphic descriptions and world settings had been excellently depicted in the television series but the same certainly couldn't be said for the novels' essence. As an avid fan of the novels, I am greatly dismayed that tons of the original story plots and concepts had been twisted, turned upside-down and were even missed to create an altogether new storyline. It seems as if the Legend of the Seeker has only used the Sword of Truth's characters and world settings to act on an entirely different tale. Having an entirely separate storyline, those who haven't delved yet into the Sword of Truth novels would surely find the Legend of the Seeker interesting and worth watching. They would surely be entranced by its astounding visual effects and its actors who are truly visually suited for their roles. They wouldn't find it hard not to sympathize with the characters in the long run.… Expand
  19. StephenB
    Apr 3, 2010
    1
    I keep watching this series to see how bad it really is going to get. After watching half the first season it is severely lacking in anything remotely related to the books. The only things that say that it is related to the books are in the opening credits, character names, and the original plot from the first book; kill Darken Rahl. Other than that there is nothing really related to the I keep watching this series to see how bad it really is going to get. After watching half the first season it is severely lacking in anything remotely related to the books. The only things that say that it is related to the books are in the opening credits, character names, and the original plot from the first book; kill Darken Rahl. Other than that there is nothing really related to the books. The sword of truth is a piece of steal that has no real value, other than the seeker uses it. The agiel is a small leather rod that is only about a finger width wide, look more like a police baton. It could use a lot more in the story and in the plot. Maybe if the writers read the books they would have figured out that there is already an awesome plot in them. They could take all 12 books and put them in different seasons. That way it would be a decent series to watch. Well maybe a few minor changes in characters. I would recommend that if you want to really know what this show should be to read the books and forget that this series even existed. I don… Expand
  20. LaceyM
    Mar 29, 2010
    3
    After about 10 minutes of the first episode, the only question on my mind was, "How did they get Terry Goodkind to agree to this?" Where to start? Kahlan is supposed to be the mother confessor from the begining, Richard wasn't rescued from Brenidon, the boundary can't be destroyed with catapults, Darken Rahl is Richard's father, he's friends with Zedd, and he memorized After about 10 minutes of the first episode, the only question on my mind was, "How did they get Terry Goodkind to agree to this?" Where to start? Kahlan is supposed to be the mother confessor from the begining, Richard wasn't rescued from Brenidon, the boundary can't be destroyed with catapults, Darken Rahl is Richard's father, he's friends with Zedd, and he memorized the book of counted shadows, which, by the way, contains the secrets of the boxes of orden, not the "secrets of power". The only reason I gave it a 3 was because Craig Horner looks fantastic without his shirt on.… Expand
  21. kevinb
    Mar 24, 2010
    10
    This show is great. The characters have great chemistry. It has lots of action and suspenseful moments. As the episodes go on the show gets better and better. The shows are more on the serious side but they do throw some humor in there every so often. Hopefully they can have more shows with more humor. The episode called Princess was the funniest one yet! There is nothing else on TV like it!
  22. mitchD
    Mar 1, 2010
    1
    This show is a dispicable representation of its source material. If you in any way shape or form have actually read the source material (the sword of truth series by terry goodkind) The production value is cheap and acting is almost B quality. Casting was also poorly done for the show, none of the characters match their parallel personalities from the books. The only reason this show even This show is a dispicable representation of its source material. If you in any way shape or form have actually read the source material (the sword of truth series by terry goodkind) The production value is cheap and acting is almost B quality. Casting was also poorly done for the show, none of the characters match their parallel personalities from the books. The only reason this show even gets a 1 is that it shares the same (well kind of) world as an amazing epic fantasy series. RUN!...run far away and pretend that this "series" never existed. Imagine this...the chimes were let loose with the release of this show, the world in which this show resides is on its way to destruction.… Expand
  23. GregoryH
    Jan 26, 2010
    2
    If you are in anyway a fan or reader of the Sword of Truth books I cannot recommend strongly enough that you avoid this series. People who haven't read the books will probably find this show average, maybe even watchable. To fans, however this show is an appalling mess of the worst parts of the book, missed plot points, bad character development, bad acting and forced action. To sum If you are in anyway a fan or reader of the Sword of Truth books I cannot recommend strongly enough that you avoid this series. People who haven't read the books will probably find this show average, maybe even watchable. To fans, however this show is an appalling mess of the worst parts of the book, missed plot points, bad character development, bad acting and forced action. To sum up the eventual train wreck of a plot, the very first episode commits a number of fatal mistakes which brings down Goodkind's story tumbling down like a pack of cards. To name a few, Richard's farther is alive (wasn't killed by Darken Rahl), he isn't friends with Zedd, He hasn't memorised the book or even seen the book before (Confessor is now useless). The boundary is now a trivial thing that can be broken through with a few catapults. The story is so far removed its easier to say that its an entirely unrelated story where everybody inexplicably has the same names as in the book. To summarize. Forget the show, read the book. If you've already read the book, still forget the show but do something else.… Expand
  24. MikkoP
    Jan 14, 2010
    8
    Compared to Xena and Hercules - it have continuous background story, more realistic shades of gray consequences and moral choices - and it is not comedy show (big plus). Actors are doing good work inside story / scripts limits
  25. MichaelS
    Jan 12, 2010
    1
    What an annoying show. If I hear the words "the seeker" one more time I'm going to vomit, the words must be repeated over one hundred times per episode. The series screams B-Grade. The music was obviously sourced with an inadequate budget. The acting is poor, I cringe when I hear the over-used and recycled lines used in the weakest ways possible. It is like the series has taken the What an annoying show. If I hear the words "the seeker" one more time I'm going to vomit, the words must be repeated over one hundred times per episode. The series screams B-Grade. The music was obviously sourced with an inadequate budget. The acting is poor, I cringe when I hear the over-used and recycled lines used in the weakest ways possible. It is like the series has taken the worst facets of every fantasy series and combined them to create a practical joke.… Expand
  26. RobertF
    Dec 8, 2009
    2
    Well, after Episode Three i killed the entry in my DVD recorder timetable. Sad, because Sword & Sorcery is a genre I like a lot, from Fritz Leiber through Robert E Howard to Tanith Lee. How on earth could anyone produce an S&S show that is so horribly, excruciatingly bad? - fractured plot, unbelievable characters, absurd back-story, every incident plagiarised and then wrecked by some Well, after Episode Three i killed the entry in my DVD recorder timetable. Sad, because Sword & Sorcery is a genre I like a lot, from Fritz Leiber through Robert E Howard to Tanith Lee. How on earth could anyone produce an S&S show that is so horribly, excruciatingly bad? - fractured plot, unbelievable characters, absurd back-story, every incident plagiarised and then wrecked by some stupid trivial change. So I finally did my homework, and found out why -= it was "based" on a story by Terry Goodkind - a prolific user of word-processing tools who might become a writer if he ever learns how to write his way out of a paper bag. Nope, I'll wait for the cartoon remake with Alvin and the Chipmunks, surely far more suited to the starring roles than the present hopelessly inept human cast.… Expand
  27. D.San
    Dec 8, 2009
    9
    If u like the story of a man chosen to destroy evil in medieval lands, facing a new evil every episode, you would like this show, the story doesn't get stretchy neither are the episodes monotonous. A good change for those of you who are bored of your current shows. Actors are pretty good, and by that I mean in looks and makeup, I wouldn't know about acting as i am not an actor, If u like the story of a man chosen to destroy evil in medieval lands, facing a new evil every episode, you would like this show, the story doesn't get stretchy neither are the episodes monotonous. A good change for those of you who are bored of your current shows. Actors are pretty good, and by that I mean in looks and makeup, I wouldn't know about acting as i am not an actor, but if you still ask me, not bad!… Expand
  28. PS
    Dec 6, 2009
    8
    Solid show, good acting/effects/storyline. Gets better as it goes along, looking forward to where the show is headed
  29. dawnw
    Nov 12, 2009
    10
    I have read all the books and love them, (read them several times). And yes I love the show, as the, powers that be, put it the show is based on the books and was meant to go in a slightly different direction. Which makes the I wonder what would happen if Richard, Kalan, or Zedd followed this fork. The start of season 2 was great!
  30. anonymous
    Nov 11, 2009
    8
    The books were a new take on fantasy with smart social commentary thrown in. The show is the complete opposite, with a bunch of cliches thrown in, bad acting, and campy dialogue. Still, it's pure Sam Raimi. If you're a Raimi fan you'll love it, even if they completely butchered the books.
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

78
#78 Best TV Season of 2008
11
#11 Most Discussed TV Season of 2008
7
#7 Most Shared TV Season of 2008

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
53

Mixed or average reviews - based on 7 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 7
  2. Mixed: 6 out of 7
  3. Negative: 0 out of 7
  1. The Hollywood Reporter
    Reviewed by: Ray Richmond
    60
    Big on style but more challenged in terms of substance, Seeker demonstrates much production savvy but at the same time too little provocative/evocative interaction aside from the ultra-violent kind.
    Read full review
  2. New York Post
    Reviewed by: Linda Stasi
    50
    A new syndicated series that is like the illegitimate love child of "Lord of the Rings" and a weekend role player.
    Read full review
  3. Newark Star-Ledger
    Reviewed by: Alan Sepinwall
    40
    The premise is pretty standard Joseph Campbell, journey of the hero stuff, but the execution is poor.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »