- Network: SyFy
- Series Premiere Date: Apr 11, 2016
User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 41 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 16 out of 41
-
Mixed: 9 out of 41
-
Negative: 16 out of 41
Watch Now
Where To Watch
Review this tv show
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
User Reviews
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Jun 21, 2016Critics are lazy morons: they never watched beyond the pilot. I did and I addicted. It feels way more real than a piece of entertainment is supposed to be. Giving it a nine because it keeps getting better and the best is yet to come.
-
Apr 12, 2016Sometimes new shows are great and draw you in. Sometimes new shows leave you scratching your head asking what did I just watch. "Hunters" falls into that latter category. I watched the pilot. I'm not sure what it's about, where it's going, or why I would ever want to watch again. That's a problem.
-
May 17, 2016
-
Jun 22, 2016Great post 9/11 sci-fy show. Yes, the pilot is not great as it does not hint enough on what's next. But it is something that happens for a ton of show. It is a matter of being willing to go past the first episode. It gets better and better by the episode
-
Jun 24, 2016Pilot was fairly crappy, but they got their act together afterwards. Since then, It just keeps getting better. A Scifi equivalent of Homeland. Awesome!!!
-
May 15, 2016It looks rather cheap, boring characters & cast, and the writing isn't good at all. After only a few minutes you know that sadly it's a waste of time.
-
Apr 13, 2016A rather pitiful show from a company that had of late produced some real winners. They turn down making great shows like descendants and instead produce f grade rubbish like this which has a interesting idea but poor characters shallow script lines that are forgettable and lead characters that are a really good reason not to watch this sad excuse for a show
-
May 10, 2016This is simply the worst science fiction tv show ever made. Why syfy has ordered this is beyond my comprehension. It doesn;t work at any level: it is bad science fiction and a bad procedural. Its creators meby think that gore is enough to make a good show but it isn't.
-
Apr 19, 2016
-
Mar 28, 2017Boring characters, unimpressive story line, a total disappointment. The main character is so unlikable that if they cut him out right now you wont notice. The plot thickens as it goes but it was not interesting to begin with. I gave it the benefit of the doubt as a si-fi fan but I cant take it anymore!
-
May 21, 2016
-
Jun 26, 2016I'm with the majority. The pilot almost had me walking away. I couldn't give it my undivided attention until episode 4. I hope the writers and directors are reading our comments.
-
Sep 17, 2016
Awards & Rankings
-
Unfortunately, Hunters carries about as much intellectual heft as a YouTube conspiracy video.
-
The conspiracy thickens without ever grabbing you--mostly because Flynn is so, so boring. The show tries to add some juice to his story line by hinting that Abby might be an alien herself, but good luck trying to muster up the energy for caring about that. ... Hunters does have some things going for it: Britne Oldford, who steals scenes as the conflicted agent. ... Speaking of watchable aliens, the main baddie McCarthy is another treat. Julian McMahon plays him with a deranged sense of fun.
-
Grim, humorless, and instantly off-putting.