Hannibal

:

Season 1
  • Network: NBC
  • Series Premiere Date: Apr 4, 2013
Season #: 3, 2, 1
User Score
8.6

Universal acclaim- based on 1055 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 957 out of 1055
  2. Mixed: 37 out of 1055
  3. Negative: 61 out of 1055
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Expand

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

view
per page
  1. JLuis_001
    May 12, 2018
    9
    It was always recommended to me, I never had the opportunity to watch it, I'm incredibly overwhelmed with guilt. This is one of the best series I've seen in years and in my life. Dark, violent, psychological and elegant.

    Great performances, great technical values, great story, great narrative. Spectacular.
  2. DKStrohl
    Aug 1, 2018
    9
    I just re-watched all 3 seasons for first time since its initial airing. It's still one of the most interesting and inventive shows I have ever seen on television, cable or otherwise. It really hits it's stride at the end of season 1. Season 2 and 3 are just perfect. WATCH THIS NOW.
  3. luke100
    Jan 11, 2018
    9
    This goes for the entire show: it's just amazing. I usually find it difficult to get into crime stories, but Will Graham is way too compelling of a character to not get sucked into this world, and so is the entire supporting cast. And obviously Mads Mikkelsen as Hannibal is perfect. Hannibal's and Will's chemistry works incredibly well and the dynamics of their relationship are really atThis goes for the entire show: it's just amazing. I usually find it difficult to get into crime stories, but Will Graham is way too compelling of a character to not get sucked into this world, and so is the entire supporting cast. And obviously Mads Mikkelsen as Hannibal is perfect. Hannibal's and Will's chemistry works incredibly well and the dynamics of their relationship are really at the heart of all three seasons. Admittedly, some find parts of season 3 a it boring - so did I, but not only do I see a point in them after some thinking, but also the second part, meaning the adaptation of the Red Dragon, more than makes up for it. I always recommend this show to anyone I meet.… Expand
  4. tdkDallas
    Jul 28, 2013
    8
    Incredible show that surprised the heck out of me. Before watching it I was very skeptical and now I am not sure how it isn't more popular. Hard to believe it's on NBC.
  5. Poirot
    Sep 6, 2013
    8
    This shows lives up to the first two films and is superior to the film of the same name. Mads Mikkelsen plays a very believable Hannibal. The only way you will not like it is if you are so tied to Anthony Hopkins that you can not see past that. Hugh Dancy is good as the police officer drafted by the FBI. The only problem with this shows is the muddled writing. Part of this was becauseThis shows lives up to the first two films and is superior to the film of the same name. Mads Mikkelsen plays a very believable Hannibal. The only way you will not like it is if you are so tied to Anthony Hopkins that you can not see past that. Hugh Dancy is good as the police officer drafted by the FBI. The only problem with this shows is the muddled writing. Part of this was because the main FBI officer (Dancy) has mental issues, but it goes beyond that and this needs to be worked on before the second season. I would recommend more crisp writing somewhat like a meal that Hannibal prepares.… Expand
  6. sergiomach5
    Jun 1, 2013
    8
    As a fan of The other films starring Will Graham (Re Dragon and Manhunter) the TV series was of interest to me. I love how they have created Will as a cop who can barely handle his thoughts as a killer, and how he can still do his best to solve the crimes at hand. Having Hugh Dancy is surprisingly welcome since he seems less likely to have a sick mind the same way Edward norton or WilliamAs a fan of The other films starring Will Graham (Re Dragon and Manhunter) the TV series was of interest to me. I love how they have created Will as a cop who can barely handle his thoughts as a killer, and how he can still do his best to solve the crimes at hand. Having Hugh Dancy is surprisingly welcome since he seems less likely to have a sick mind the same way Edward norton or William Peterson did, yet portrays it very well.
    Mads Mikkelsen makes for a much different Hannibal than that of the iconic Hopkins, and can show even subtle touches as to how the character is thinking, be it in his quarters or when viewing a crime scene.
    The crime scenes are downright disturbing and having Will bring the scene to life adds to the freakiness. The third episode in particular had gruesome imagery, as well as some pyschological scares in what happened to some of the victims of the first episodes killer. Its truly inventive and leaves a lasting impression to the viewer.
    I am looking forward to how the rest of the season turns out, but I am hooked and cannot wait to see where the series goes next.    … Expand
  7. The_Scrutiny
    Aug 27, 2014
    8
    This is a show you simply cannot miss. Expect great acting from almost every cast member, spectacular visuals, and memorable dialogue. That being said, be prepared for a painfully formulaic first half of the first season. It's not bad or boring; the episode structure is just very evident pretty soon. But if you can get past that, the second half shows more promise with an interesting plotThis is a show you simply cannot miss. Expect great acting from almost every cast member, spectacular visuals, and memorable dialogue. That being said, be prepared for a painfully formulaic first half of the first season. It's not bad or boring; the episode structure is just very evident pretty soon. But if you can get past that, the second half shows more promise with an interesting plot arc. Then get ready for some of the finest television around with the Season 2, because that's where it's all at!… Expand
  8. ViniciusPaiva
    May 10, 2015
    8
    The cast is stellar, cinematography is superb. But still, the show often falls flat as a procedural one. The week's killer usually are too unrealistic or not interesting enough. I keep thinking that the show would have been much better if it didn't feel the need to show us the case of the week. Instead, I'd rather see them focusing on the character's development. Or have a big serialThe cast is stellar, cinematography is superb. But still, the show often falls flat as a procedural one. The week's killer usually are too unrealistic or not interesting enough. I keep thinking that the show would have been much better if it didn't feel the need to show us the case of the week. Instead, I'd rather see them focusing on the character's development. Or have a big serial killer per season.… Expand
  9. MarkJames
    Apr 26, 2013
    8
    I don't like that often the episodes are about about a "killer of the week" that will not be referred to again. I like the Abigale Hobbs story. The episode where she killed the boy had me spellbound. I don't like self contained episodes.
  10. NBAluke579
    Sep 1, 2013
    8
    Incredible first season show. An unexpected surprise by all accounts. The show is gorgeous, and has amazing visuals. The acting is very strong, and the plot is thick with intrigue and suspense. This is an extremely violent and gory show,and some of the images are so explicit i'm shocked it's able to be shown on Network TV. This is a great show, and it hooks you immediately. The characterIncredible first season show. An unexpected surprise by all accounts. The show is gorgeous, and has amazing visuals. The acting is very strong, and the plot is thick with intrigue and suspense. This is an extremely violent and gory show,and some of the images are so explicit i'm shocked it's able to be shown on Network TV. This is a great show, and it hooks you immediately. The character of Hannibal Lector is amazing as well. If you enjoy dark dramas with a hint of horror this is it. My rating: 8.0/10… Expand
  11. rafaram
    Apr 9, 2013
    8
    This is one of the best tv shows of this season. The writing is good, direction is top notch and the acting is brilliant. Finally a cop show that offer something different enough to make it feel unique. If this show receives any negative reviews it is because the direction is too complex for some people to appreciate. For those who thought this show was confusing just go back to CSI. ThisThis is one of the best tv shows of this season. The writing is good, direction is top notch and the acting is brilliant. Finally a cop show that offer something different enough to make it feel unique. If this show receives any negative reviews it is because the direction is too complex for some people to appreciate. For those who thought this show was confusing just go back to CSI. This is a smart show, with great actors amazing writing but overall amazing direction.… Expand
  12. Pucifer
    Nov 11, 2013
    8
    This is a superbly made TV series--great direction, art direction and sets, excellent acting (the leads and even the supporting roles are particularly well-cast for a TV series), artful digital cinematography, and exceptional music and sound effects. The story is a grisly, gory and extremely suspenseful one, however, the implausibilities start to accumulate and overwhelm the enjoyment (ifThis is a superbly made TV series--great direction, art direction and sets, excellent acting (the leads and even the supporting roles are particularly well-cast for a TV series), artful digital cinematography, and exceptional music and sound effects. The story is a grisly, gory and extremely suspenseful one, however, the implausibilities start to accumulate and overwhelm the enjoyment (if you can call it that) of the story after a while. I will stay tuned for Season 2, but it's really no fun watching supposedly brilliant FBI agents get played and made to look dumb in episode after episode. Come on guys--when will ya finally put the dots together?!… Expand
  13. Viennagirl
    May 4, 2013
    8
    Great show.the acting is amazing.not for children or young adults!i
    It plunges you in the depths of the human mind and its sick wanderings while making the subjects look fairly normal.
    I
  14. joeyperez
    Jun 2, 2013
    8
    solid 7.5, rounded up.

    pretty far from perfect, but different and very stylised. it is both easy to follow and a piece obsessed with art and aspiring to be it. this show is at once accessible and also very interesting. it isnt hannibal the early years, as its concerned less with hannibal that with its protagonist, and is of a different style and tone than the films. it does work, and it    solid 7.5, rounded up.

    pretty far from perfect, but different and very stylised. it is both easy to follow and a piece obsessed with art and aspiring to be it. this show is at once accessible and also very interesting. it isnt hannibal the early years, as its concerned less with hannibal that with its protagonist, and is of a different style and tone than the films. it does work, and it is well worth watching. its production values are top notch and its an eerily curious piece. you will need to put your suspension of disbelief in a fridge, nestled amongst some choice cuts of carrion though.    … Expand
  15. MCWFC
    May 14, 2013
    8
    Two episodes in and things are promising. Not sure how Hannibal and Graham's relationship will develop but, so far, at least, I am enthralled. Mikkelsen is very good as Hannibal
  16. callumjsouth
    Aug 6, 2015
    8
    Gripping, gory, great. A TV feast. Psychologically intriguing, aesthetically stunning and mentally rocking. Hannibal is one of the best dramas on TV. Bryan Fuller delivers a fresh presentation of Hannibal Lecter in a world where horror is just a day to day occurrence. This show is so graphic that at times it's hard to believe it is on network television. People meet horrific ends whilstGripping, gory, great. A TV feast. Psychologically intriguing, aesthetically stunning and mentally rocking. Hannibal is one of the best dramas on TV. Bryan Fuller delivers a fresh presentation of Hannibal Lecter in a world where horror is just a day to day occurrence. This show is so graphic that at times it's hard to believe it is on network television. People meet horrific ends whilst the show's true main character Will Graham lives a similarly horrific life, tortured by his own mind and empathy. Characterisation is strong here, be it Hannibal the master manipulator or Graham the tortured profiler. Laurence Fishburne's Jack Crawford even gets to take centre stage as his marriage troubles are very emotionally explored. Hannibal's strongest suit though and it certainly has many, is it's intensity. Entertainment comes easily to thrillers especially one this layered, unique and exciting. It truly hurts me that some people will overlook Hannibal due to reasons such as the network it is on, it's timeslot or it's possible disturbing content. This is drama of the highest order. Incredible depth, cinematography, entertainment and most of all, food.… Expand
  17. booboo
    Jun 5, 2013
    8
    What a well written and directed show.Also very stylish with great scenery.The first episode didn't grab me,too many flashbacks but fast forward 2,3 and 4 and i'm loving it.Mads Mikkelsen is his usual fantastic versatile self.All the characters are good.This show is a real breath of fresh air from CSI and the like.By the way Lar,i'm a woman and over the age of 45 and the more blood andWhat a well written and directed show.Also very stylish with great scenery.The first episode didn't grab me,too many flashbacks but fast forward 2,3 and 4 and i'm loving it.Mads Mikkelsen is his usual fantastic versatile self.All the characters are good.This show is a real breath of fresh air from CSI and the like.By the way Lar,i'm a woman and over the age of 45 and the more blood and guts the better.I love a good Gore Fest.… Expand
  18. marco86
    Jul 25, 2013
    8
    The movie plot is interesting but sometimes lack of the thrill we would expected. The movie's idea is complex and rarely found in any other TV series before, and it's too soon to judge this movie, since there's so much more that can be offered.
    Extra credit to Mads Mikkaelsen "He perfectly brings a difference approach of Hannibal Lecter with almost the same level of charisma and    The movie plot is interesting but sometimes lack of the thrill we would expected. The movie's idea is complex and rarely found in any other TV series before, and it's too soon to judge this movie, since there's so much more that can be offered.
    Extra credit to Mads Mikkaelsen "He perfectly brings a difference approach of Hannibal Lecter with almost the same level of charisma and characterization as Sr. Anthony Hopkins, which surprisingly nice and magnetic"    … Expand
  19. droper666
    Nov 14, 2013
    8
    The show is in general is a intense though for some slow moving uncensored look at the mind of a narcissistic brilliant sociopath. There is also an atmosphere of viscous madness which the show I think really does well at expressing subtly from episode to episode that is very unique and unseen in most television.

    The actors range in their ability but the main cast is really delivering    The show is in general is a intense though for some slow moving uncensored look at the mind of a narcissistic brilliant sociopath. There is also an atmosphere of viscous madness which the show I think really does well at expressing subtly from episode to episode that is very unique and unseen in most television.

    The actors range in their ability but the main cast is really delivering and very intense in their performances. The performances are also unique in their interpretations of the characters so the show really has its own take on Hannibal though many core elements remain the same.

    The show is also difficult to predict given its design. It is not based on Hannibal alone, but a handful of characters orbiting each other including Hannibal working in the realm of serial killer crime and psychology. I like this aspect of the show since I have no idea where it is going given it is not driven completely by Hannibals choices alone.    … Expand
  20. Dots
    Feb 27, 2014
    8
    It is an interesting and ingenious series.Having Mikkelsen,Dancy and Fishburne in it,it makes it better.It's a great mix of horror,thriller,and the drama that the character Will Graham does with every day.
  21. MikeyStephens
    Mar 10, 2014
    8
    I give this series such a high rating because I enjoy watching Hannibal Lector as a character his elegance and morale stand in what he does makes him just a brilliant character to watch I could not imagine trying to act as Dr Lector hat goes off too Mads (can't not remember his second name) and any actor who had attempted to tap the mind of the Hannibal Lector, Anthony Hopkins is still theI give this series such a high rating because I enjoy watching Hannibal Lector as a character his elegance and morale stand in what he does makes him just a brilliant character to watch I could not imagine trying to act as Dr Lector hat goes off too Mads (can't not remember his second name) and any actor who had attempted to tap the mind of the Hannibal Lector, Anthony Hopkins is still the standard an actor has to reach to become Hannibal, Mads does it so well.… Expand
  22. AllenReviews
    Jun 4, 2015
    8
    When I first heard about a hannibal tv show I thought it wasn't a good idea - but I was very wrong. Hannibal is such a beautiful show even though the subject of the tv shows seems rather dark, and the acting is also fantastic from the shows lead cast. My only problem with the first season was some of the cases the episode has only because there are so many shows that already do that kind of thing.
  23. marc5477
    Dec 26, 2015
    8
    A strong showing, all round, by everyone. The acting and script writing is very good with a few plot holes here and there. Hannibal is one of the most menacing characters I have seen in a TV show, and his actions and interactions made me want to see what will happen next. Like in the original movie, there are times when you actually root for Hannibal because in many ways he is a lesserA strong showing, all round, by everyone. The acting and script writing is very good with a few plot holes here and there. Hannibal is one of the most menacing characters I have seen in a TV show, and his actions and interactions made me want to see what will happen next. Like in the original movie, there are times when you actually root for Hannibal because in many ways he is a lesser evil than the people he eats, but at other times you can only grimace at his actions. The two bad things about this show are that the cops tend to be really dumb, and it gets tiring to see Hannibal get extremely lucky all the time. In many ways, this show reminds me of Dexter, but Dexter added a lot of dark humor while this show tends to stay straight forward. Still, one of my favorite shows on TV and I was very sad when they announced its cancellation. Hopefully someone will pick it up and continue.… Expand
  24. horcrux2007
    Jan 11, 2016
    8
    One of the mot beautifully filmed blood baths on television. Every episode is gory, intense and packed with amazing writing. The cinematography makes Hannibal one of the most stunning shows on television.
  25. lesann100
    Nov 24, 2014
    8
    I thought this series was a thrilling mind experience....it is dark and creepy...the irony of the mentally ill detective dealing with the seriel killer...and how they dance back and forth with each other....the entire relationship between them is twisted........it bothers me that the characters continue to engage him with their guard down...they know he is a master manipulator....and myI thought this series was a thrilling mind experience....it is dark and creepy...the irony of the mentally ill detective dealing with the seriel killer...and how they dance back and forth with each other....the entire relationship between them is twisted........it bothers me that the characters continue to engage him with their guard down...they know he is a master manipulator....and my how they are influenced.....my other issue is that it is extremely bloody...Im shocked that the graphics are allowed on prime time.… Expand
  26. albethos
    Jan 29, 2020
    8
    Although Mikkelsen and Fishburne bring another superb angle to the characters we got to know in TSOTL, it is Hugh Dancy playing a tormented Will Graham that towers above anything in this show. Bryan Fuller's adaptation is compelling but it takes its time to get where we want the show, or at least Season 1, to be.
  27. FilmQueen
    Oct 10, 2015
    8
    This is a visually stunning and interesting new interpretation of the story. It's creepy in a good way. Hugh Dancy's and Mads Mikkelsen's acting are great.
  28. pureshores
    Nov 27, 2016
    8
    Season 1 was about finding their niche in the already way too crowded market of crime shows.
    They realized in Season 2 that they didn't need to find their niche. They had the niche: Hannibal.
    Once settled, they had the freedom to make every episode in Season 3 like a work of art, visually and lyrically. I started out thinking I'll have to drag myself to finish the full 3 seasons. I    Season 1 was about finding their niche in the already way too crowded market of crime shows.
    They realized in Season 2 that they didn't need to find their niche. They had the niche: Hannibal.
    Once settled, they had the freedom to make every episode in Season 3 like a work of art, visually and lyrically.

    I started out thinking I'll have to drag myself to finish the full 3 seasons. I ended up still hoping and waiting for a Season 4.    … Expand
  29. amheretojudge
    Jan 16, 2018
    8
    please, come in..

    Hannibal Projecting such a dark topic is very tricky but the creator here keeps it smart by letting the audience imagine it until the series has taken hold of you and then shows you its real tone which is not easy to watch especially post second season. Its stage is really set in a more metaphorical way which opens a dreadful door of the combination of horror and    please, come in..

    Hannibal

    Projecting such a dark topic is very tricky but the creator here keeps it smart by letting the audience imagine it until the series has taken hold of you and then shows you its real tone which is not easy to watch especially post second season. Its stage is really set in a more metaphorical way which opens a dreadful door of the combination of horror and thrills that easily gives you the goosebumps. And in the end the heart of the series lies within the relation between the lead actors which is beautifully poetic.    … Expand
  30. theasset
    Apr 30, 2013
    7
    The pilot episode doesn't jump at you straight away, but give it a chance. By the third episode the writing and great acting hooks you and you can't stop watching.
  31. Jhwarfield
    Sep 6, 2013
    7
    No show I can think of has gone quite so far to not just romanticize serial killing, but to attempt to raise it to the level of an art form. This Hannibal barely resembles his namesake from the movie, but he is just as interesting.
  32. McLaughlinViews
    Aug 17, 2013
    7
    Hannibal, a television re-imagining of the novel Red Dragon by Thomas Harris. The show which puts all other attempts at television psychological horror to shame. Hannibal stars Casino Royale star Mads Mikkelsen. Mikkelsen gives a strong performance bringing back to life the iconic role which Sir Anthony Hopkins played in the 1991 Silence of the Lambs. The show also stars Hugh Dancy as aHannibal, a television re-imagining of the novel Red Dragon by Thomas Harris. The show which puts all other attempts at television psychological horror to shame. Hannibal stars Casino Royale star Mads Mikkelsen. Mikkelsen gives a strong performance bringing back to life the iconic role which Sir Anthony Hopkins played in the 1991 Silence of the Lambs. The show also stars Hugh Dancy as a psychological disturbed FBI agent, WIll Graham. The series remains constantly strong throughout the series, until the last episode where the ending seems like a little bit of a cop-out in comparison to the rest of the series. When watching the ending I couldn't help but feel cheated, I understand that the series has received a commission for a second series, which should be good but if they cop-out the ending of series 2 as well I can assure you I won't be watching the third.… Expand
  33. AxeT
    Jul 26, 2015
    7
    Not a review. Where is the delete option?! Not a review. Where is the delete option?! Not a review. Where is the delete option?! Not a review. Where is the delete option?! Not a review. Where is the delete option?! Not a review. Where is the delete option?! Not a review. Where is the delete option?! Not a review. Where is the delete option?!
  34. krkbomb
    Apr 28, 2014
    5
    Hannibal is a TV show that offers stark contrasts. In the end, while it provides a vivid and highly-detailed vision, that vision is too sanitized and too focused. It lacks any of the intermediate shades between light/dark, good/evil, pure/tainted, or clear/blurry. Instead it can only present sharp distinction, or at best offer capitulation of one over the other. Unlike Silence of theHannibal is a TV show that offers stark contrasts. In the end, while it provides a vivid and highly-detailed vision, that vision is too sanitized and too focused. It lacks any of the intermediate shades between light/dark, good/evil, pure/tainted, or clear/blurry. Instead it can only present sharp distinction, or at best offer capitulation of one over the other. Unlike Silence of the Lambs, there is no transformation and no imagination, only characters locked in an endless and uninspired waltz.

    I will point out the good parts of the show (and some parts are EXCELLENT). Hugh Dancy's performance is incredible: he somehow channels the impressive performance given by William Peterson when he played this same character in the 1986 film "Manhunter," yet incorporates those idiosyncracies seemlessly into his own, more damaged, vulnerable and bitter version of Will Graham. The result is a character that shows hints of the more traditional hero hidden beneath a fragile exterior, a promise always on the verge of materializing but always in danger of shattering completely.

    The direction and photography also show signs of genius. The use of dream sequence (if a bit over-used) is perfect for keeping the audience on their toes, and some of the visuals seem to indicate just the kind of world Hannibal might imagine for himself.

    There are two major flaws in this show, and they magnify each other: the show's lack of variety, and its overstretched nature. In the introduction to this review, I talked about the overly-sanitized nature of the show and the lack of intermediate shading. This kind of world, especially with light and dark interacting but never mingling, is certainly a clear vision of Hannibal's mind, but without a dirty, down-to-earth reference point it just makes the entire WORLD look like a soap opera set. Will Graham's cabin, or shack, or house (depending on your social class) SHOULD offer us a contrast, but while its materials are cheaper and its decorations less ornate than Hannibal's home, it is nevertheless clean and sterile and perfectly, maddeningly ORDERED. This is supposed to be a character in the midst of a long nervous breakdown, we're told, yet there isn't a single misplaced item in the entire home, not one dirty dish or discarded jacket. Even when he has a fit of psychosis and demolishes his own chimney, there isn't a single cast-aside brick or even a speck of dust around the hole, they only manage to leave one of the left-in bricks SLIGHTLY ASKEW as if to say, "See, this brick is not perfectly aligned, is this character's world FALLING APART or what?!?!" Unconvincing.

    Then we have the overstretched quality. Here I refer to the plotholes and the show's length and the resulting sense of shallowness, altogether. We're only a good way through the second season and already I feel like the show is retreading and making desperate leaps BOTH. How on earth do you manage to be wrong in both directions in only 2 seasons? This show's plotholes and complete implausibility give even Dexter a run for its money. The sad thing is, much of this paragraph's whining would be inapplicable if only the series were shorter, say a film or single season mini-series. But because we are forced to rehash the same plot over again and stretch the story at the same time, nothing makes sense anymore. The FBI refuses to investigate. The instructor refuses to learn. And the villain refuses to be frightening in any real way. If anything the only character capable of frightening us in this show is Will Graham, because the performance is nuanced enough to make the character itself unpredictable, and because his is the only character moving between the light and dark (again, if ONLY there were anything interesting in between) over and over and over again. Even the most delicious dish, no matter how well presented, needs variety.    … Expand
  35. phairlever
    Aug 13, 2013
    5
    Hannibal delivers on the gore, but after about the tenth episode I found myself almost laughing at the heaviness it was trying unsuccessfully to achieve. The actors are quite good, especially Fishburne, but they have little to work with; the writing doesn't make me care about them much. Unrelenting dark mood, good acting, effective gore, and heavy handed music that has so little to backHannibal delivers on the gore, but after about the tenth episode I found myself almost laughing at the heaviness it was trying unsuccessfully to achieve. The actors are quite good, especially Fishburne, but they have little to work with; the writing doesn't make me care about them much. Unrelenting dark mood, good acting, effective gore, and heavy handed music that has so little to back it up that it becomes jokey (or grating, take your pick) do not a great show make. Hannibal is trying to be so heavy but it just isn't, and it is the worse for trying so hard and falling flat. This said, it has some appeal, and is not a total loss, mostly because of the acting. Hopefully the writers will study the definition of subtle and make the show better. As of now, the show is as subtle as a sledgehammer.… Expand
  36. Robynn2345
    Apr 14, 2013
    4
    I really did not like the first episode. Too many flashbacks of Will Graham. I much prefer the Thomas Harris books and his first film, MANHUNTER. This tries too hard with blood and gore but needs a better plot.
  37. Avrett
    May 16, 2013
    4
    The imagery and murders have been interesting but so far I haven't seen any of the episodes wrap up nicely. They always seem to need a leap in logic to catch the killer. Also, this rendition of Will Graham is a bit aggravating. It'd be nice if the entire world didn't seem to revolve around him. The actor playing Hannibal is pretty good though.
  38. alexvanhessing
    Feb 27, 2014
    4
    No need to mention what the series is about, mostly self explanatory, except to say there's a need to quell any qualms about the actors playing these characters as awful because they're not, unfortunately its the most solid thing in this show. Mildly "entertaining" as many of these shows are, but many users and critics seem to miss the point when it comes to the shows that are on networksNo need to mention what the series is about, mostly self explanatory, except to say there's a need to quell any qualms about the actors playing these characters as awful because they're not, unfortunately its the most solid thing in this show. Mildly "entertaining" as many of these shows are, but many users and critics seem to miss the point when it comes to the shows that are on networks such as NBC, CBS, etc..... there's almost no point in reviewing them in any traditional sense since the whole point of them is to create advertising revenue, almost makes it pointless going to work if your employed by one of the programs. The sex scenes are completely censored, there no swearing at all, so except for a period piece where speech patterns are different this seems to be incredibly unrealistic, zero nudity, the violence is like a cartoon, and where there does seem to be a shred of integrity in the writing its completely undone by treating the audience like morons and repeating themselves over and over. This is my review for most shows on the these networks, and, in my opinion, unless its on FX, HBO, Netflix, Showtime, etc, there's almost no point in tuning in. That's not to say every single show on these providers are television gold but at least they have a creative head start no? I could go on all day about the lines that separate "entertainment" and "art" but in the end if you choose guilty pleasures over mental sustenance, or at least something healthy in-between, then there's little left to say.… Expand
  39. Cineck
    Apr 27, 2013
    3
    The story is so full of BS that no actor can save this show. Written with complete disregard of probability, logic and common sense. A waste of great cast, characters and your time.
  40. asdf072
    Apr 9, 2013
    3
    The premise seems interesting, but the directing and acting make this show seem to drag on forever. Even graphic blood and psychopaths can't stop this from being a snooze-fest.
  41. simplysmart
    Mar 14, 2014
    3
    slow slow slow... flashbacks are redundant with little connection to story...we know hannibal is the it killer, but are dragged through the trial of will graham.......getting really tired of the persecution of will graham...
  42. Sergi
    Jan 25, 2015
    3
    Попытка показать что-то новое, открыть, раскрыть Ганнибала с другой стороны не увенчалась успехом.
    Сам сериал, сюжет его грешит излишним психологизмом и при этом довольно поверхностен, что не вызывает интереса к нему самому (сюжету) и его главным действующим лицам. Логика его примитивна. Очень много американских сериалов страдают от этого. Их любовь и повальное увлечение психоанализом и    Попытка показать что-то новое, открыть, раскрыть Ганнибала с другой стороны не увенчалась успехом.
    Сам сериал, сюжет его грешит излишним психологизмом и при этом довольно поверхностен, что не вызывает интереса к нему самому (сюжету) и его главным действующим лицам. Логика его примитивна. Очень много американских сериалов страдают от этого. Их любовь и повальное увлечение психоанализом и бихевиоризмом не добавляют интереса, не делают сюжет напряженнее, глубже, а часто вызывают лишь разочарование и даже раздражение.
    И на это есть причины.
    Подобные фильмы, сериалы часто занимаются навешиванием ярлыков на людей, а последние в подавляющем большинстве своём представлены безумцами, порочными, обязательно страдающими тем или иным психическим недугом или отклонением. Каждый в той или иной мере осознаёт своё безумие и, или гордится им, или страдает, скрывает, но непременно желает поделиться им с психоаналитиком, чтобы лучше понять или избавиться.
    Это довольно навязчивая идея, точка зрения не обходит своим вниманием, присутствием практически каждый фильм или сериал. Данному сериалу, по мнению его создателей, вообще грешно было отходить от этого. Вот он и превратился в кино, где каждый пытается анализировать каждого, плакаться ему и при этом творить свои злодеяния. Длинные разговоры о жизни и смерти с использованием психологических терминов, споры о смысле жизни, о представлениях о ней и т.д., при этом не отличающиеся глубиной, новизной, порядком утомляли.
    Чтобы вызывать дополнительный интерес, сюжет о Ганнибале разбавляли вставкой других маньяков в повествование. И здесь не обошлось без определённых шаблонов вышеописанных. Закрой глаза, плюнь и ты обязательно попадёшь в маньяка. К этому опять толкает сюжет.
    Только все остальные маньяки какие-то мелкие, примитивные. Их легко находит и использует по своему коварному замыслу Ганнибал. Он сильнее, выше их, превосходит во всём. В этой части Ганнибал представлен практически как "санитар леса", как Декстер. Но не совсем. Но явно, чтобы вызвать определённые положительные чувства и эмоции к нему. Ведь он не только убивает хороших людей, но и избавляет от плохих. Он лучше их, он переигрывает их и потому должен заслуживать уважение. Но все это как-то слабо преподнесено, слишком уж открыто и грубо. В итоге в этом направлении тоже провал у сериала вышел. И если Декстер начал утомлять к 6 сезону. То Ганнибал уже к середине 2 сильно утомил, что досматривать приходилось через силу, чтобы посмотреть концовку.

    Слабой стороной сериала являются и основные персонажи. Ганнибал данного сериала значительно уступает Ганнибалу Хопкинса по всем параметрам. Он идёт даже в разрез с образом, к которому многие привыкли. Он вызывает раздражение. Хопкинский же вызывал даже восхищение, сочувствие и переживания за него. И каким бы монстром он не был, он нравился зрителю, его любили. Этот Ганнибал больше похож на восковую куклу с неприятно двигающимися губами. Его надменность слишком бросается в глаза. Его деяния, ходы слишком предсказуемы и в большинстве просто омерзительны. И данное обстоятельство никак не способствует даже появлению зачатков каких бы то ни было положительных чувств, эмоций к нему.
    Что еще раздражает в нём в данном сериале, так это умение уворачиваться от пуль (пусть это не показывается в сериале, но явно предполагается, иначе ни как не объяснить некоторые моменты) и чрезмерные выносливость и живучесть. Он умудряется стоять на ногах, быть полным сил и здраво мыслить после серьёзных ударов, потери крови, удушения и т.п. Он просто терминатор какой-то.
    Уилл с одной стороны слишком самоуверенный, самонадеянный, но в тоже время такой наивный. И попытки превратить его в коварного во 2 сезоне выглядят очень не к месту и вызывают еще большее разочарование в нём.
    Джек в исполнении Фишборна с одной стороны сильный, уверенный. Он нравится немного. За пределами работы он именно такой. Но в бюро, на местах преступления он становится в момент глупым. Он не может обойтись без помощи либо Уилла, либо Ганнибала, либо иного специалиста подобного профиля. И это глава поведенческого отдела ФБР. Он как ребёнок с новой игрушкой не для его возраста, вертит её, крутит, а разобраться, понять ничего не может без помощи взрослого. Но при этом его называют "гуру". И это разочаровывает. Это отталкивает от него.
    Рассказывать о других даже нет желания. Ни один из основных героев сериала не вызывает симпатии, сочувствия. Все персонажи, включая описанных очень поверхностны. Те же, кто эту симпатию хоть немного вызывают непременно погибают.

    Сериал средним назвать можно с большой натяжкой. Единственным положительным моментом можно назвать отсутствие эротических сцен, которых стало ну очень много в последних фильмах и сериалах. Видимо создатели посчитали, что жестокости будет достаточно. Это им в зачёт.    … Expand
  43. shellview
    Apr 27, 2013
    2
    I love a good horror movie as well as the next but this is just not good gru. This show lacks any sense of humor or empathy. The writing is putrid and the graphics are disturbing without any redemption. Having watched the third episode I cancelled my season pass and moved on. When they leave a serial killer's daughter alone in her house, even though, she may have been involved in theI love a good horror movie as well as the next but this is just not good gru. This show lacks any sense of humor or empathy. The writing is putrid and the graphics are disturbing without any redemption. Having watched the third episode I cancelled my season pass and moved on. When they leave a serial killer's daughter alone in her house, even though, she may have been involved in the murders, I threw up my hands. A suspect left alone to kill another suspect and then gets recruited by Hannibal who has time to hide the body while a crap load of cops are outside...oh yeah somehow he gets a bump on the head.....dreadful dreck! The dialogue and acting is god-awful. Oh, and the constant "eerie" soundtrack to set the mood is mind-numbing. This show is NBC's version of "Monk" meets "Criminal Minds"...feh!… Expand
  44. Spanky
    Apr 7, 2013
    2
    The actors are all top notch. The concept is extremely intriguing. The actual writing and direction are horrible. Execution is everything and they manage to blow it by a mile. I'll watch one more but if the next episode stays as muddled as the first one.....sayanara.
  45. noellebaquiche
    Jun 28, 2013
    1
    The mere content of the show alone would be enough to engage a decent portion of the populous. However, for people who enjoy thrillers, horrors and crime drama, the lack of suspense and lack of charisma in the lead characters detracts heavily from what should be a gripping show. I can only blame a poor choice of cast and heavy handed directed from spoiling what could have been a watchable series.
  46. shelflife
    Dec 4, 2013
    1
    Pretty much everything is wrong with this show, although I'd for me personally Hettienne Park and her character account for at least 20% of what's wrong here. She manages to establish herself as this show's Jennifer Carpenter within the first few seconds of her screentime.

    But to be fair, there's a lot more wrong with this show, a garden variety case of basic cable syndrome: Everything    Pretty much everything is wrong with this show, although I'd for me personally Hettienne Park and her character account for at least 20% of what's wrong here. She manages to establish herself as this show's Jennifer Carpenter within the first few seconds of her screentime.

    But to be fair, there's a lot more wrong with this show, a garden variety case of basic cable syndrome: Everything in this show is a sillier repetition of things that have been done before. It's all dulled and dumbed down to the least common denominator. The smug "jokes" are Burn Notice material; the "murder face" effect is repetitive and gets old during the first half of the pilot, unless you're Amish.

    The source material might have made for a decent series on a premium cable network, although tons of things would have to be completely different, including all actors except Mads Mikkelsen.    … Expand
  47. seriesscout
    May 8, 2014
    1
    Hannibal is trivial. The makers are trying desperately to pin serial murder aesthetically. Weak attempt. The character of Hannibal brings it only to the charm of a drunken head waiter from the provincial station restaurant. The psychological problems that are representing the most unbearable in the long term. The cadaveric however, are beautifully decorated, if one likes such images. ButHannibal is trivial. The makers are trying desperately to pin serial murder aesthetically. Weak attempt. The character of Hannibal brings it only to the charm of a drunken head waiter from the provincial station restaurant. The psychological problems that are representing the most unbearable in the long term. The cadaveric however, are beautifully decorated, if one likes such images. But that alone does not a good series.… Expand
  48. Crusty_Cowboy
    Jun 12, 2014
    1
    This is a television show that I could not get into. After seeing The Silence of the Lambs, Hannibal (the movie), and Red Dragon, watching this show does no justice to the story line of the films.
    Hannibal (t.v. show) takes place pre-Silence of the Lambs and pre-Red Dragon. The actors that are playing in this show do not fit well in comparison to the actors in the Hannibal Lecter movie    This is a television show that I could not get into. After seeing The Silence of the Lambs, Hannibal (the movie), and Red Dragon, watching this show does no justice to the story line of the films.
    Hannibal (t.v. show) takes place pre-Silence of the Lambs and pre-Red Dragon. The actors that are playing in this show do not fit well in comparison to the actors in the Hannibal Lecter movie triology. This is, of course, my opinion. It's worth checking it out.    … Expand
  49. ziou
    Apr 10, 2013
    0
    I was looking forward to this series, since The silence of the Lamps is my fav. movie of all times. I could never have imagined that the actor who is casted as Dr. Lecter would be such a disappointment i guess i had high standards from Sir Anthony Hopkins!
    ...i don't think i will be watching episode 2
  50. arislaf
    Jul 8, 2015
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. First season, starts very good, at the middle start to fall... To many questions and details that makes you wonder wtf? How is this possible? (the hand that none saw who placed it in the morgue, or the totem of bodies that someone put them so high, dug the holes and not covered, and not any way explained how the bodies build up so high... Second season, first episode starts awesome... second episode and already start the **** Many reasonless fill in, many scenes with no point (graham stands fishing for 2 minutes, glass of hannibal with camera slowly turning 360 degrees). Avoid it at all costs.… Expand
  51. 47128185
    Feb 28, 2016
    0
    Awful! Maybe it was over my head, but I love crime/suspense/drama and believable horror. Will could see what happened in prior crime scenes except the ones abigail and hannibal were involved in? Will and his dizzy, headache, anguished, sweaty routine got old after awhile. I didn't get all of the imagery. It was soooo slow at times. I watched the whole first season and read the synopsis ofAwful! Maybe it was over my head, but I love crime/suspense/drama and believable horror. Will could see what happened in prior crime scenes except the ones abigail and hannibal were involved in? Will and his dizzy, headache, anguished, sweaty routine got old after awhile. I didn't get all of the imagery. It was soooo slow at times. I watched the whole first season and read the synopsis of the rest of the seasons up to the series finale. For a cracker jack FBI team unable to put the links or suspect Hannibal early on, was just too much to bear. Its one faux pax after the next. Next.… Expand
next
Page:

Awards & Rankings

69
#69 Best TV Season of 2013
4
#4 Most Discussed TV Season of 2013
34
#34 Most Shared TV Season of 2013

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
70

Generally favorable reviews - based on 32 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 21 out of 32
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 32
  3. Negative: 3 out of 32
  1. Slant Magazine
    Reviewed by: Chuck Bowen
    Jun 18, 2013
    88
    Hannibal is richer and more ambiguous than prior Harris adaptations; it's an exploration of social decay that's rife with literal and figurative cancers eating everyone alive from the ground up.
    Read full review
  2. The Hollywood Reporter
    Reviewed by: Tim Goodman
    Apr 5, 2013
    80
    By the end of the first hour, it has managed to make Dancy, Fishburne and Mikkelsen a formidable trio of characters, and each actor responds in kind with strong, engaging performances. Another sign of a good series is the fact that beyond the main three, the supporting cast is filled with solid actors and--more important--strong, vivid characters.
    Read full review
  3. Zap2it (Inside the Box)
    Reviewed by: Rick Porter
    Apr 4, 2013
    70
    It's anchored by several great performances, and it's among the more distinctive and gorgeously filmed shows on the air right now.... What did turn me off a bit in the first couple episodes of Hannibal was the victims were all young women.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »