User Score
Universal acclaim- based on 531 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 460 out of 531
-
Mixed: 38 out of 531
-
Negative: 33 out of 531
Watch Now
Where To Watch
Review this tv show
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
User Reviews
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
MikraT.Sep 19, 2008A wonderful and very realistic sci-fi adventure. I was surprised to see many of methods used in my field of research being demonstrated on the show.
-
-
TwilightC.Sep 18, 2008I was not engaged at all. I didn't like either lead. It took the gore from x-files to an extreme and didn't do it well.
-
-
RolandB.Sep 18, 2008
-
-
JohnM.Sep 17, 2008Great cast. Great story. Great show. It keeps you watching. The mythology is strong and appears fairly deep. I'm looking forward to many seasons of this show! What is so terrible about LOST references or Altered States homages? I think that's part of the appeal to shows like this. It gives credit where credit is due.
-
-
shSep 16, 2008I think this show should be taked off the air.
-
-
CharlesS.Sep 15, 2008Wow what an awful script. Turned it off after 45 minutes. Would that Lab really be ther in working order after 17 years? The scientist just happened to walk right out of prison with his son and agent ? Wow.
-
-
mauricioc.Sep 15, 2008Show is amazing!!! This series will have a couple of seasons!!!
-
-
kateSep 12, 2008I watched because of Josh Jackson and JJ Abrams. The acting was not as good as thought it would be. Josh Jackson was a disappointment unless the eye rolls and soap opera looks were supposed to be funny. The other people I had not seen before so I can.t say they were disappointing. I usually like JJ Abrams shows and unless this improves I wont be watching it.
-
-
CraigA-SSep 12, 2008Like the X-Files. But stupider. Assuming of course its possible for ANY show to be stupider than the X-Files. The fact that cybernetics is referred to in the opening credits as a "fringe" science merely shows the scientific illiteracy of the people responsible for this dreck.
-
-
JDubSep 12, 2008This show's first episode blew me away. First time I actually watched a TV show twice in one week. Very solid first episode and it can go only go up from here.
-
-
ChrisC.Sep 12, 2008An overhyped pilot with a predictable yet drawn out plot. The science is--dare I say--a joke, and the lab scenes look reminiscent of MacGyver meets Mr. Wizard. Hopefully it gets better as more of the pattern is revealed.
-
-
RodericR.Sep 12, 2008
-
-
JSep 12, 2008
-
-
blitheSep 11, 2008
-
-
RaysaJ.Sep 10, 2008This one stands a chance. I will take a look at another episode or two.
-
-
RafaelD.Sep 10, 2008Im a huge fan of J.J Abrams work , but i see a bright future for the show , its hard to judge a show just by the pilot , as we all know a lot of shows can get better and better every week. For a start , i think its a good pilot , lets see how this show develop.
-
-
AdamT.Sep 9, 2008
-
-
SteveCSep 9, 2008A cross between the X-files and 24. A good start had me fully engaged, but like the others I lost interest halfway through. Too much work. Meh.
-
-
joshSep 9, 2008
-
Awards & Rankings
-
The last half-hour of the pilot is by far the best part of Fringe; it’s full of twists, turns, action and suspense. And the first 20 minutes or so, in which a team of federal agents investigate a mysterious occurrence on a commercial airliner, is brisk and efficient, if (like much of Fringe) a little bombastic and overdirected. Aside from a cinematic dream sequence, the middle hour of Fringe is much more problematic.
-
It has good characters and plenty of action. It keeps its science fiction accessible, not abstract. Maybe best of all, it has a great sense of humor.
-
Lots of good action and lots of fun to boot.