Flash Gordon

:

Season 1
  • Network: SyFy
  • Series Premiere Date: Aug 10, 2007
User Score
2.2

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 57 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 11 out of 57
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 57
  3. Negative: 44 out of 57
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Expand

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

view
per page
  1. JoeC.
    Jun 27, 2008
    6
    Flash Gordon was a campy but fun show that started soft but got better as it went on. I think the writers were hitting their stride by the end of the first (only) season, but I think they knew they were being axed and tied up most of the loose ends for the season finale.
  2. DaveT.
    Apr 27, 2008
    9
    It's ashame that so many of you don't give a chance to any shows, sorry guy but this show is supposed to be funny and adapted to the low budget, you cant always suck the executive of the channel like stargate atlantis, witch has a similar way of scripting the shows, but compensating with CG effects...wow you are a bunch of suckers, did you ever saw buck rogers in the 25 century, It's ashame that so many of you don't give a chance to any shows, sorry guy but this show is supposed to be funny and adapted to the low budget, you cant always suck the executive of the channel like stargate atlantis, witch has a similar way of scripting the shows, but compensating with CG effects...wow you are a bunch of suckers, did you ever saw buck rogers in the 25 century, sorry but budget, funny scripting and unknown actors played in it and the people understood it and watched it. So who are you to spit on a show when you don't know the real basic of a good show? Too bad they hire anybody as a journalist to critic shows like you guys and with limited reasons wow I could do better for sure even when its not a good show I show some respect.… Expand
  3. Red5
    Jan 14, 2008
    1
    The only reason this show could even consider having a score above zero is that Baylin is hot. Other than that, weak plot, dialogue, casting and crap visual effects. Oh - and Terry M, who wrote the 28-page rant above, you should spend more time honing your writing for Flash than for Meta critic. I love it when a show's writers come pollute the forums, defending their shoddy work. The only reason this show could even consider having a score above zero is that Baylin is hot. Other than that, weak plot, dialogue, casting and crap visual effects. Oh - and Terry M, who wrote the 28-page rant above, you should spend more time honing your writing for Flash than for Meta critic. I love it when a show's writers come pollute the forums, defending their shoddy work. Bad, bad, bad - and it doesn't matter who's fault it is. It's just awful TV. This marks the beginning of the end of the Sci Fi Channel.… Expand
  4. AlexM
    Dec 20, 2007
    0
    This show is horrible beyond belief. In fairness, I have given this show a chance, but it just sucked every time and it goes on and on and on. I cannot believe that SCIFI canceled Dresden Files and Stargate SG1, for something really awful. Also, Ming is more of a tyrant than a metro sexual, but this show gives emphasis on Ming being much more of a metro sexual than a tyrant. Come on. This show is horrible beyond belief. In fairness, I have given this show a chance, but it just sucked every time and it goes on and on and on. I cannot believe that SCIFI canceled Dresden Files and Stargate SG1, for something really awful. Also, Ming is more of a tyrant than a metro sexual, but this show gives emphasis on Ming being much more of a metro sexual than a tyrant. Come on. SCIFI should rethink to reinstate Stargate SG1 and Dresden Files to somehow bring the luster they lost. It does not take a lot of brain power to notice the major suckiness of this show.… Expand
  5. WilliamTurner
    Nov 12, 2007
    0
    I think I'm going to be sick..... Even Lexx was better.
  6. PeterF.
    Oct 25, 2007
    0
    The show is abysmally bad. I'll sit through most sci-fi shows but this is horrible. Bad acting, rubbish stories and cheap production. Sci Fi needs to extend the next season to at least 20 episodes for Eureka and bring back the Dresden Files if it hopes to keep it's audience.
  7. TerryM
    Oct 6, 2007
    8
    I
  8. AlanB
    Oct 5, 2007
    0
    I like to give a show a chance, besides I was looking forward to this one. I watched the whole first episode, it was horrible. I normally give a show the first episode for stage setting, then judge on the second, I made an exception for this one, I didn't watch anymore.
  9. Scott
    Oct 5, 2007
    0
    Every canceled SciFi show I know of is better than this. SG-1, Firefly, Farscape, . . . The list could go on forever! Bringing anything back instead of this would improve the SciFi channel.
  10. EddieW.
    Sep 28, 2007
    10
    I love this show and I do not want it cancelled, please keep it on the air!
  11. Linker
    Sep 25, 2007
    0
    Wow. This show really sucks. I watched the first episode and thought, maybe it is just the first one. But no, they all suck. What has happened to Sci Fi? They got rid of Dresden Files and made this crap instead? Somebody is making some really poor decisions at that network.
  12. JamesN.
    Sep 25, 2007
    0
    The worst show on tv.
  13. JoeS.
    Sep 25, 2007
    1
    SciFi Channel cancelled Stargate SG1 and Dresden Files, and only gave Eureka 13 episodes, for this pile of stinky poo? Unbelieveable how some people keep their jobs.
  14. WendyDrury
    Sep 25, 2007
    0
    Gawd awful. Flush Gordon!
  15. BrainSnow
    Sep 25, 2007
    0
    Absolutely horrible. Terrible Acting. Abysmal scripts. Cheesy Dialogue. There are no redeeming qualities to this trite.
  16. MichaelK.
    Sep 22, 2007
    2
    Dale (Gina Holden) as the female lead would not have been my chose. A Flash Gordon with no piloting or fighting skills was kind of a major let down. Sci-Fi canceled The Dresden Files for "THIS". Maybe if you changed writers from the wrestling show this might at least be remembered fondly before being canceled. The new fall tv schedule begins this week and when it does this show is "KAPUT"!
  17. EricG.
    Sep 18, 2007
    1
    Talk about the worst adaptation of a classic !! How the hell can Flash save the universe when he cant even defend his own kitchen? Acting is crap, special effects are crap, and as for the political correctiveness of the whole thing, when did the real world start dictating our imagination ? I want the whole thing just to go away!
  18. BrandonS.
    Sep 18, 2007
    7
    While the series premiere was pretty poor, I gave it another chance, and I actually think it's gotten to be a pretty good show. It's certainly not on the level of Battlestar Galactica or Eureka, but the show has heart and a growing sense of humor. I think this show merits a little patience. Hopefully, since SciFi doesn't depend on huge ratings, Flash Gordon will be given While the series premiere was pretty poor, I gave it another chance, and I actually think it's gotten to be a pretty good show. It's certainly not on the level of Battlestar Galactica or Eureka, but the show has heart and a growing sense of humor. I think this show merits a little patience. Hopefully, since SciFi doesn't depend on huge ratings, Flash Gordon will be given the chance it deserves.… Expand
  19. EknirkD.
    Sep 7, 2007
    0
    I can't believe this crap! I never saw such a cheap story, bad actors and strange CGI-tricks. It's a shame!
  20. JamesP
    Sep 1, 2007
    7
    Fun? yes. Campy? Yes. But what do you expect from a TV series based off of an old movie serial and a bad 80's movie remake? This show takes Flash Gordan where it should be. For fans of the series, it's a shame that it won't last.
  21. DavidMno
    Aug 29, 2007
    0
    Bad! Bad! Bad!!! do i need to say anything else???
  22. RebeccaM.
    Aug 22, 2007
    2
    So joyless. MIng the Merciless looks like a dyspeptic accountant and he runs and evil water utility. I've seen community theater manage better costumes out of the local goodwill. And "Flash" isn't an astronaut, or even a sprinter. He's a marathoner. But worst of all, no one on this show is having any fun.
  23. jm
    Aug 20, 2007
    3
    this could have been a great show, to bad it seems SciFi did not give a damn about its quality.
  24. RobW.
    Aug 16, 2007
    0
    An insult to a venerable comic strip!
  25. MikeN.
    Aug 15, 2007
    3
    Completely uninteresting.
  26. TodS.
    Aug 14, 2007
    2
    Well It's not the worst thing I've ever seen, but it doesn't quite rise to mediocre either. This review is based on the first half hour of the pilot, cuz that's when I turned it off.
  27. RalphM.
    Aug 13, 2007
    1
    Simply unwatchable
  28. CaseyH.
    Aug 13, 2007
    0
    It wasn't Flash Gordon. I'm not a geek but when you say "Flash Gordon" certain images pop into my head. Images of retro rocked ships, evil over the top bad guy, space, (and allot more) and the show has none of that. They took away what makes Flash "Flash". Yes modernise it but keep what makes it Flash. Get rid of the screaming week woman (I hate woman like that no matter what It wasn't Flash Gordon. I'm not a geek but when you say "Flash Gordon" certain images pop into my head. Images of retro rocked ships, evil over the top bad guy, space, (and allot more) and the show has none of that. They took away what makes Flash "Flash". Yes modernise it but keep what makes it Flash. Get rid of the screaming week woman (I hate woman like that no matter what the show/movie is or when it was made) and make them strong non-cowards, update the technology's so they look futuristic too us, update the story so it works better with todays audiences but keep the over the top evil bad guy, give the show a retro look but made with modern special effects and makeup tools, set the vast majority (if not all) of the story on in space and on aliens planets (mostly Ming's planet). But they didn't do any of that. I'd be willing to bet good money that the show wasn't even meant to be a Flash Gordon remake. The title and character name where probably added later to get attention for the show. Well, it hurt it, badly. Beyond the fact that it is not Flash Gordon its pretty good but far from grate. It would make good filler for when they don't have something for a particular time slot. If it weren't Flash, maybe a 4 or 5 but since its supposed to be flash, a big fat zero.… Expand
  29. JasonT.
    Aug 13, 2007
    0
    I feel alseep. I want the 2 hrs of my life back.
  30. SteveA.
    Aug 13, 2007
    1
    Flash Gordon was very disappointing--bad acting, bad cast, bad script, and bad effects. It's 90 minutes I will never get back!
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

89
#89 Best TV Season of 2007
47
#47 Most Discussed TV Season of 2007
34
#34 Most Shared TV Season of 2007

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
35

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 13 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 13
  2. Mixed: 5 out of 13
  3. Negative: 7 out of 13
  1. Chicago Tribune
    Reviewed by: Maureen Ryan
    30
    As played by Johnson, this 21st Century Flash is likable enough, and the plot occasionally achieves a tick-tock level of efficiency, but there’s little else to recommend this series.
    Read full review
  2. Christian Science Monitor
    Reviewed by: Gloria Goodale
    58
    For all the comic-book fans who can't get enough of grown-ups carrying ray guns and discussing the destruction of planet Earth, pretty lame effects and super-stiff acting keep this from being really great camp.
    Read full review
  3. The Hollywood Reporter
    Reviewed by: Ray Richmond
    40
    The whole story is over the top, but it's mitigated by the sense of humor it has about its own broad elements. The acting is serviceable enough and--to Rosenthal's credit in the pilot--surprisingly consistent. What the plotting lacks in cohesion and suspense, the production often compensates for in visual appeal.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »