User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 10 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 4 out of 10
-
Mixed: 4 out of 10
-
Negative: 2 out of 10
Review this tv show
-
Firefly LaneYour Score0 out of 10User ScoreGenerally favorable reviews- based on 10 Ratings
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
User Reviews
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Feb 3, 2021The acting holds the show together. Writing needs work but Katherine Heigle proves she is an awards winning actress.
-
Feb 20, 2021This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Feb 15, 2021I generally liked the main characters and the somewhat unique plot but i did not enjoy the use of flashback so much. It was a good tool to provide the back story for the characters and it helped to understand the characters in a much deeper level but its far too excessive and confusing at times. I would still watch the next season.
-
Feb 8, 2021Read the book years ago . Absolutely love Kristen Hannah ! She is an amazing story teller. Excellent adaptation of the book so far . The cliff hangers at the end made me scream "No" at my phone !
-
Apr 4, 2022bad
[ bad ]
adjective, worse, worst;(Slang) bad·der, bad·dest for 36.
not good in any manner or degree.
Awards & Rankings
-
[Heigl] is just right for the role of a damaged star who’s always just about to go off the rails. Chalke, from “Scrubs,” is fine, although a bit miscast as the shyer, less glamorous one. The two actresses, along with the two who play them as teens, are as good as they can be, given the flatness and redundancies of the script. They gamely play out all the crying, and yelling, and cuddling, as the story unfolds busily, randomly, and, ultimately, unsatisfyingly.
-
“Firefly Lane” is determined to wring tears and laughter out of you, and it does — it’s just that more often than not, it does that unintentionally and for all the wrong reasons. But you can’t lay the show’s problems at the feet of its heroines, who are all varying ranges of great. Chalke and Heigl make the series far more entertaining than it has any right to be.
-
It is confusing and often maddeningly boring; it lacks a cohesive identity other than as a vehicle for Heigl and Chalke to shout and cry. Its time-hopping device, clashing emotional tones and baffling plot twists add up to something far less than the sum of its parts.