Disenchantment

:

Season 1
  • Network: Netflix
  • Series Premiere Date: Aug 17, 2018
Season #: 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
User Score
6.7

Generally favorable reviews- based on 257 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 164 out of 257
  2. Mixed: 43 out of 257
  3. Negative: 50 out of 257

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

view
per page
  1. Virrus999
    Feb 15, 2022
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Season 4 of the series is the worst of all. Plotting around LGBT propaganda turned a good series into 0… Expand
  2. geewah
    Jan 9, 2021
    5
    Disappointing. Groening's third project for TV lacks the wit and edginess of his predecessors.
  3. Cyri76
    Sep 29, 2019
    10
    J'en attendais beaucoup et j'ai eu un truc éblouissant, super travail de la part de Matt !
  4. KeenWatcher
    Feb 19, 2019
    3
    When I watched this all I could think of was not disenchantment as a fantasy comedy. More like disappointment.
  5. ucankabak
    Dec 20, 2018
    0
    Sorry but it was really terrible. Not funny, also that elmo guy grinds me up so hard.
  6. KaiserGuy
    Nov 10, 2018
    4
    Tired predictable jokes, tediously awkward comedic timing. Uninspired and not engaging. 5 and a half episodes in and I'm not going to miss it. Loved Futurama and the Simpsons. No magic here.
  7. MikefromAngus
    Nov 4, 2018
    7
    The characters are very likable, sometimes its funny as well. Loved the animations and music! The show is alittle slow, but very watchable. The animations and music are excellent !
  8. Dsros96
    Oct 29, 2018
    10
    Everybody was waiting this show to be The Simpsons. This isn't the Simpsons. The characters are interesting and not plain once they are fully presented. The medieval world portrayed is amazing and the animation is beautifully performed.
  9. TristanMH
    Oct 29, 2018
    8
    Most reviews I've read of this show compare it to the Simpsons or Futurama, but that comparison really doesn't do it justice. Disenchantment is a comedic fantasy adventure set in a world with a surprisingly detailed lore.

    Jokes don't stem from crazy antics or one liners but instead from characterization that develops over the season. Take Elfo for example. He is basically a badass of    Most reviews I've read of this show compare it to the Simpsons or Futurama, but that comparison really doesn't do it justice. Disenchantment is a comedic fantasy adventure set in a world with a surprisingly detailed lore.

    Jokes don't stem from crazy antics or one liners but instead from characterization that develops over the season.
    Take Elfo for example. He is basically a badass of an Elf. Yet when he gets to the human world he goes on to gradually realize just how innocent and gullible he really is. And he changes. He becomes increasingly manipulative of others and temperamental (In the entertaining way). That's the key to this. The characters are multidimensional and change.

    The season does get of to a slow start. While I was amused, I didn't binge this until around the 5th or 6th episode. But that's not to say the episodes were bad. Rather, they have satisfying conclusions that don't make me feel a need to find out what happens next. A show like this would be better suited for a weekly release schedule.

    This show is entertaining. But if you constantly try to compare it to the Simpsons or Futurama, you will be disappointed. Because this show, at it's core, is not like Futurama or The simpsons. It is far bloodier and dare-I-say sexier than those. It's not a pure comedy. It's an adventure show.

    If you're looking for the same kind of 2-jokes-a-minute comedy as Futurama or Simpsons, you will be disappointed. If you're looking for something to just kick back and enjoy while eating a pizza, this is the show for you.

    I'm looking forward to the future of this series. The world evidently has a ton of thought and lore put into it and I can't wait to find out more about the Demons.

    I bet that by the time of it's third season, Disenchantment will have a rabid fanbase of conspiracy theorists. Might as well get on the bandwagon now.

    All in all, a decent show with great world building and fleshed out characters. Not binge-worthy.    … Expand
  10. HannibalB
    Oct 24, 2018
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This show depends too heavily on ongoing one-joke character gags: a demon who's always saying on-the-nose evil things, a drunken Tomboy of a princess, a slob King with a Brooklyn accent. This is old. It goes back to the '40s, and it really wasn't that funny even then. There are other, more interesting ways to subvert expectations, but Disenchantment seems to go for all the easy ones. The characters are so defined by their stereotypes, that you can't really get beyond them. And even in cartoons, character matters. This is a disappointing offering from a brilliant team. Maybe they're just too tired to come up with new things.… Expand
  11. hopefulcynic
    Oct 20, 2018
    5
    Made by Matt Groening (known for The Simpsons and Futurama) this show is painfully average. It's not a bad show, but it's not good either. The biggest problem is it's lack of likable characters. The Simpsons and Futurama were built around the characters. Sure the episodes had plots, but you tuned in for the characters and how they interact with each other. This show boils down to Eflo=dumbMade by Matt Groening (known for The Simpsons and Futurama) this show is painfully average. It's not a bad show, but it's not good either. The biggest problem is it's lack of likable characters. The Simpsons and Futurama were built around the characters. Sure the episodes had plots, but you tuned in for the characters and how they interact with each other. This show boils down to Eflo=dumb and naive, the demon's evil and a bad influence, Bean is a rebellious alcoholic, and the king is dumb and yells a lot.

    That's about as developed as the characters get. As far as the plot and story telling, well, it's mediocre at best. The things that happen in the episodes have no consequence, but that's kind of how these types of cartoons are. The first two episodes had a couple witch looking mofos watching Bean in a crystal ball talking about how the demon is working and so is their plan and whatnot. I don't know what happened to that because I'm at like episode 9 and that hasn't been brought up again (I'm sure the show will revisit that eventually). Basically it's not a bad show, but there's not a single memorable thing to it. It's nice to watch an episode then leave it on to fall asleep to.    … Expand
  12. Atzilla
    Sep 25, 2018
    4
    So okay, it's average.
    You wont hate every second you watch this.
    You will chuckle once or twice in a better episode.
    You will neither care about the story nor the characters.

    Nothing remarkable about this series.
    General writing and timing of jokes are subpar.

    Sadly, a wasted opportunity.
  13. Risax
    Sep 23, 2018
    7
    I must admit, the first few episodes didn't really grab me. It all felt...rushed, even though the first episode was nearly 40 minutes long.

    The characters flew at you and seemed to come out with their back stories and motivations immediately. Which honestly made me feel as if there was nothing new we could learn about them. Comedy was also a bit hit and miss for me, though I remember    I must admit, the first few episodes didn't really grab me. It all felt...rushed, even though the first episode was nearly 40 minutes long.

    The characters flew at you and seemed to come out with their back stories and motivations immediately. Which honestly made me feel as if there was nothing new we could learn about them.

    Comedy was also a bit hit and miss for me, though I remember laughing more in the later half of the season than in the first half.

    Where it really became interesting for me was in the last two or three episodes where more of the ongoing plot, which continues to play out in the background over the course of the season, became more apparent. And we do learn some new things about Bean and Elfo...right before it ends on a big cliffhanger!

    Overall, Disenchantment is a good, but not great, show that took too long to get me hooked. It'll give you a few laughs, especially if you liked Futurama and The Simpsons, but like I said it took me a few episodes to genuinely start enjoying it and actually get interested in it. I remember that it took me some time with Futurama before I really loved it too, but generally saying "It's not great, but give it a few episodes and you might like it." isn't high praise.

    Still...give it a few episodes, and you might like it. For now, I'd say Disenchantment is a solid 7 for me and I am curious about Season 2.    … Expand
  14. alejandro970
    Sep 23, 2018
    7
    That is you get when mix in a shaker Shrek, The Simpsons and Game of Thrones. Cynical and sarcastic characters and distinctive humor of Groening. Maybe will not like for everyone but have it´s good moments. Shall we wait or not a next season?
  15. hornysoul
    Sep 21, 2018
    8
    Esta série é um must-watch. É espirituosa e hilária. Embora algumas piadas não tenham sido captadas por todos, a série compensa pela sua pura qualidade. Os personagens são divertidos e adoráveis.
    Creio que muitos dos usuários do Metacritic não viram a série com muita atenção. Não entendo como podem classificar a série abaixo de um 6.
  16. Darkshine
    Sep 14, 2018
    10
    Ragazzi c'é da constatare che anche i Simpson e Futurama all'inizio facevano cagare, ma poi hanno fatto un successo della madonna, dategli fiducia.
    Disincanto secondo me è strutturato molto bene, soprattutto riguardo agli eventi e i costumi che ricordano molto l'epoca medievale.
    Ritengo che sia migliore dei Simpson e Futurama, perché c'è più ironia scurrile e la trama e tutto un    Ragazzi c'é da constatare che anche i Simpson e Futurama all'inizio facevano cagare, ma poi hanno fatto un successo della madonna, dategli fiducia.
    Disincanto secondo me è strutturato molto bene, soprattutto riguardo agli eventi e i costumi che ricordano molto l'epoca medievale.
    Ritengo che sia migliore dei Simpson e Futurama, perché c'è più ironia scurrile e la trama e tutto un susseguirsi, essendoci un filo logico episodio dopo episodio rendendo il tutto più coinvolgente.    … Expand
  17. Pedzz94
    Sep 6, 2018
    10
    I found this series amazing so far. Its unique, takes place in a setting i love (the art is awesome). The characters are great and the humor is just right.
  18. BeeneMachine
    Sep 6, 2018
    3
    The pace meanders, the dialogue is flat, the characters are boring, and the jokes simply don't land. The worst part is that it's not even bad enough to enjoy ironically.
  19. duddy5698
    Sep 1, 2018
    6
    Disenchantment could be so much better. I still enjoyed it, though. Very hit and miss. It is very generic. Disenchantment is a giggle show. I never laughed out loud, but I never cringed. It gets better as it goes along. There are just so many better shows to watch.
  20. WhiskeyStories
    Sep 1, 2018
    7
    Kind of an uneven show. Some episodes were utterly brilliant (The Princess of Darkness, Faster, Princess! Kill! Kill! ), on par with The Simpsons or Futurama and there's some which were just unfunny bores (Swamp and Circumstance is easily the worst episode). There's a lot to like (wonderful world building, some genuinely great characters, fantastic music etc.) and a lot to be disappointedKind of an uneven show. Some episodes were utterly brilliant (The Princess of Darkness, Faster, Princess! Kill! Kill! ), on par with The Simpsons or Futurama and there's some which were just unfunny bores (Swamp and Circumstance is easily the worst episode). There's a lot to like (wonderful world building, some genuinely great characters, fantastic music etc.) and a lot to be disappointed by (unoriginal ideas, half-baked jokes and writing, some underwhelming voice-acting etc.), so the divisive reaction from both the public and critics is perfectly understandable. For me the good outweighs the bad and I can see Disenchantment's potential to get better. Will tune in for season 2 for sure.… Expand
  21. Angel_Sigh
    Aug 31, 2018
    3
    I know this has already received pretty 'mixed' reviews, so most people won't be expecting too much from Disenchantment - after all, the Groening name has lost some of its lustre after the atrocity exhibition of late-period Simpsons, The Show That Wouldn't Die, as well as the slightly 'meh' quality of Futurama as it progressed. So I think people were hoping for something great but had theI know this has already received pretty 'mixed' reviews, so most people won't be expecting too much from Disenchantment - after all, the Groening name has lost some of its lustre after the atrocity exhibition of late-period Simpsons, The Show That Wouldn't Die, as well as the slightly 'meh' quality of Futurama as it progressed. So I think people were hoping for something great but had the good sense not to expect it, and like I said, the reviews bear this out.

    I'm here to tell you the reviews are wrong, or at least the Metacritic rating is wrong. There is no way this is a 55% show, as it is at the moment. It is much, much worse. It is fist-chewingly bad in places, and at times I just had to marvel at the fact that it got made at all.
    Sometimes with a show it's a combination of factors that render it unwatchable - the actin, plot holes, rubbish soundtrack, etc., they all come together to make something rubbish on a general level. That's not the case with Disenchantment, because there is plenty about it that is very good...
    - it's lovely to look at; I still like the Groening aesthetic, it still has charm, and character designs are as likable as ever, the princess with her two buck teeth in particular.
    - the soundtrack is decent enough
    - the voice acting is pretty good, with some brilliant choices in regards to British comedians. Noel Fielding, from The Mighty Boosh and The IT Crowd pops up, as does Matt Berry from The IT Crowd again, who is as dementedly brilliant as usual, and does the best he can given the quality of writing he has to work with.

    And that's what decimates the show: the writing. It is so bad, SO bad, there are moments where your mouth falls open at its awfulness. There are jokes where you spend thirty seconds trying to figure out whether it even is a joke, or just a non-sequitur that randomly found its way into the script. There are awful, obvious jokes, there are jokes that try to be smart, there are obvious jokes, there are ones that aim for subtlety but just end up unintelligible. There are all kinds of jokes, and I'd say 98% of them are either awful or depressingly obvious. The writing is staggeringly bad. Its best moments are so few and far between that you end up thinking they weren't actually intentional, and the writers just accidentally wrote something funny, much like one chimp in a thousand will accidentally manage to get onto the zookeeper's phone and start Skyping someone.

    It's baffling that something with Groening's name attached to it is so profoundly unfunny. Despite the nosedive in quality over at the Simpsons, and despite the slightly up and down quality of late Futurama, both those shows started out focused and uproariously funny, with brilliant characters embedded from the very beginning. The first series of Futurama is sublime, both in its pastichey elements and in the tightness and brilliance of its writing, and although The Simpsons' peak came, imho, around season 4, its first season was still fabulously, cynically, funny. The writing in Disenchantment is so bewilderingly bad it's impossible to understand how Groening thought it was acceptable as is. I can only assume his involvement extended no further than coming up with the setting and the three main characters, because if I thought he was satisfied with things as they stand my respect for him would go through the floor. Maybe he's bored - you certainly get the feeling from this show, that no-one involved cared that much about the quality.

    Either way, I promise you, you _will_ be disappointed. This is one of the worst things I've watched in a long time. Fans of Groening's work might want to watch it for the appearance of some of his staple voice actors and actresses(John DiMaggio as the king is relatively likable, perhaps a character that could be rescued from the mediocrity of the show if they fleshed him out a little), or the reassuring Groening art style, or they might just like watching a well animated, stylish cartoon that parodies the fantasy world.
    But if you're a Groening fan above all because of the sheer brilliance of the writing in his shows, the scrape-yourself-up-off-the-floor hilariousness of prime Simpsons, then you may find your heart broken after watching this.    … Expand
  22. Rednetter
    Aug 30, 2018
    1
    The same joke, over and over and over again. Had it been funny, ok maybe I could have enjoyed an episode, but the execution of the "humor" reminded me of Michael Scott in the office. It was like "Simpsons for Dummies".

    Oh what, you really loved this show and wanted to read a positive review about it? Well here's one for you... this is a negative review! hahahahaha. Ooh, you just got    The same joke, over and over and over again. Had it been funny, ok maybe I could have enjoyed an episode, but the execution of the "humor" reminded me of Michael Scott in the office. It was like "Simpsons for Dummies".

    Oh what, you really loved this show and wanted to read a positive review about it? Well here's one for you... this is a negative review! hahahahaha. Ooh, you just got burnt. [repeat x 100]    … Expand
  23. Tal_Kalon
    Aug 29, 2018
    3
    Was so excited about Matt Groening tackling a fantasy cartoon, and on Netflix too! But it's so uninspired, boring, and unfunny that I barely finished the pilot episode. I don't understand how this is satisfying anyone.
  24. EludiumQ36
    Aug 29, 2018
    3
    Wow, so many shills here. How can you tell? The shills don't go deep, don't discuss details, just shallow and vague praise. The real critics here provide details. This is NOT an 8/9/10 show, at best it's a 6 or 7. I'll give a 3 since it's poor and I wouldn't watch this season again. The artwork is good but doesn't break new ground. The voices are familiar coming largely from "Futurama".Wow, so many shills here. How can you tell? The shills don't go deep, don't discuss details, just shallow and vague praise. The real critics here provide details. This is NOT an 8/9/10 show, at best it's a 6 or 7. I'll give a 3 since it's poor and I wouldn't watch this season again. The artwork is good but doesn't break new ground. The voices are familiar coming largely from "Futurama". But annoyingly, John D ("Bender" before, "King Zog" here) largely channels Archie Bunker of 70s classic "All in the Family". "Luci" the flatly drawn demon "cat" is a much too obvious comedic foil, akin to JarJar Binks. And the writing is lazy throughout. The elf character is named "Elfo", great, thanks guys for spending the 2 minutes to determine that. The series plays out in sequential fashion so it's more like an extended movie/film than a tv series. This departs from Futurama and Family Guy where the episodes are more disconnected. That in itself doesn't make it better or worse but when you do the serialized plot then there better be a good payoff to justify the 10 episode commitment you've made, and it's not, it's just meh and disappointing overall. This is a throwaway, forgettable season. Even if this show plays out for multiple seasons, you're not going to want to watch this season again.… Expand
  25. TheSwindler
    Aug 28, 2018
    10
    My wife and I loved this series! We haven't laughed that hard in a long time. I've not really watched the Simpsons before or Futurama. We may have liked it because we weren't comparing it to those. We love the setting and this was just such a good time. Can't wait for season two!
  26. Pazza123
    Aug 28, 2018
    10
    This show is a must watch. It is witty and hilarious, and while some of the jokes fail to land, this is more than made up for by the sheer quality and quantity of laughs found in the rest of the show. The characters are fun and loveable and all seem to deliver their own style of humour. My favourite qualities of the show are found in the attention to detail that the animators put into theThis show is a must watch. It is witty and hilarious, and while some of the jokes fail to land, this is more than made up for by the sheer quality and quantity of laughs found in the rest of the show. The characters are fun and loveable and all seem to deliver their own style of humour. My favourite qualities of the show are found in the attention to detail that the animators put into the signs and background writing of every episode. At first glance, it seems like the show has a general cyclical structure, but this structure is undermined in later episodes in which the plot becomes more important and slightly darker. Many of the reviews below seem overly harsh and have failed to give the show a chance, as I genuinely cannot see how someone could rate this lower than a 6.… Expand
  27. ComandanteCobra
    Aug 28, 2018
    3
    It dind't amuse me. It isn't a moking of fantasy cliches or a different approach of cartoon comedy...it's just low quality sketches.
    It look dated, derivated, slow, prevedible so I stop watching after 5 episodes.
    There is much better out there, old or new, ...Gorgoth of Barbaria, Adventure Time, Futurama,
    Archer, South Park ..all are better that this one.
  28. coljac
    Aug 27, 2018
    8
    Improves strongly over the course of the first season. While the quality of the episodes is highly variable, there are more than enough laugh-out-loud moments to make it worth your time.
  29. W2IRT
    Aug 27, 2018
    8
    This show belongs on network television, not on a streamer. They play it safe all the time; there's nothing really edgy here at all. It has potential to be great, but it's not there yet, and at only 10 half-hour shows a year, it might never achieve that status. The series drags a bit in the middle but really finds its groove in the final two episodes and it ends at a point where you'llThis show belongs on network television, not on a streamer. They play it safe all the time; there's nothing really edgy here at all. It has potential to be great, but it's not there yet, and at only 10 half-hour shows a year, it might never achieve that status. The series drags a bit in the middle but really finds its groove in the final two episodes and it ends at a point where you'll really want to see what happens next. Too bad you'll have to wait a full year to find out.… Expand
  30. alex2542
    Aug 26, 2018
    7
    Better than the critics are saying but still hasn't quite hit its stride either. The first five episodes are pretty mediocre. But things pick up from there. There's good potential here, and in the shows more insane scenarios you start to see the writers really take advantage of the world they've created. The pacing of the comedy also gets better after the first four or so episodes whichBetter than the critics are saying but still hasn't quite hit its stride either. The first five episodes are pretty mediocre. But things pick up from there. There's good potential here, and in the shows more insane scenarios you start to see the writers really take advantage of the world they've created. The pacing of the comedy also gets better after the first four or so episodes which feel pretty...disjointed. I did also enjoy that the narrative feels a lot more procedural than the past two Groening outings but we'll see how they resolve the cliffhangers to know the full effect of that quality. One thing that bothered me a bit was that all the funniest stuff in season 1 came from the non regular characters.

    First off, Luci. Luci to me was the weakest part of the show. I mean I love Eric Andre but his line delivery sounded like he would pop ambien before going into the recording booth and try to say his lines while trying to stay awake. Luci is basically Bender if you took Bender's energy and brashness from a 10 to a 2. I mean the funniest Luci parts were background characters talking or interacting with him. He offered very little that hasn't been done before and better. If you're gonna do a Bender type, it has to be a bender type. Not a Bender that acts and sounds Narcoleptic.

    Elfo was fine overall. His boyish obliviousness makes the moments where he acts up and says something outlandish amusing.

    Bean I think was fine but not very funny. Where Fry was immediately funny because of his lack of intelligence it feels like the writers can't figure out how to make Bean funny. Others have said she's not relatable, and I can see that argument cause it's hard to relate to someone who has access to the comfort and glamor of royalty and finds such a life tedious. But I think there's something to the idea that such a life would make her feel imprisoned when she'd rather explore the world and go on adventures. It's a classic preset for the hero's journey and so in that sense I think Bean works as a protagonist but as a comedic lead? I'm not so sure.

    Zog is...occasionally funny. More so towards the end. It's just kinda hard to get past hearing the fat slob Futurama character.

    Oona is an utter waste of a character. Muh foreign accent and being like an alien. At least with Zoidberg it was funny given the Jewish sounding name and voice. Oona's humor is: she's got a foreign accent and is gross and annoying. I hope going forward they give her more substance.

    The Little alien prince half brother (forget his name): basically Ralph Wiggums but replacing rocks for brains with hyper pampered and oblivious. He had one mildly amusing line the whole season.

    The Wizard: outside of one side story in the party while Zog is away episode and one fourth wall break he really wasn't all that funny. Oh no wait, there was this gag where he was getting threatened to get beaten by a chair that was amusing. But outside that, his role is to be some Professor Farnsworth type but it is severely lacking in Farnsworth's crotchety old man unpredictability.

    The court...Varys type guy with three eyes. Voiced with the same voice as the eldest of Mom's (Futurama) sons, forget the name, he's just not all that funny. Granted neither was the aforementioned Futurama character, but given the expanded role I expect more. All he is is an unfunny Varys type.

    Pendergast: outside an amusing locker room moment, there just wasn't any comedy with this character. And the problem is there's potential there for so much good stuff. He has some inklings of a seeming obsession with sex and then his courting of Bean, while also being the head knight. There's so much to work with there without going full Zapp Brannigan. Make him an overconfident but unsuccessful sex addict who always has his head in his own pants and there's plenty you could jump off with. All he becomes is this loyal knight with a minor fixation on courting Bean, and even that felt underdeveloped.

    Merkimer: one of the funniest "regulars." he should have gotten more screen time. His voice acting and joke delivery is the quality I expect from Groening products. I can only assume there was a scheduling conflict or something cause he was fantastic.

    Bunty: with that cockney accent and dark background there's a lot more potential with Bunty that was unmet. She did have a couple amusing moments.

    But with all these regulars combined, the bulk of the comedic weight comes from one or two off characters that have very limited moments to shine and do so by using the main cast as a platform or just work on their own. Chazz, a laughing horse, two maids attracted to Luci, an even smaller than usual elf, an unseen guy screaming up at Zog's balcony, an unnamed assassin. All combined for great fleeting moments.

    I give it a 7 cause there's a great framework to work with and the last half did show a lot of growth and showed some sign of heart. Hopefully season 2 builds on all that.    … Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

9
#9 Most Discussed TV Season of 2018
15
#15 Most Shared TV Season of 2018

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
56

Mixed or average reviews - based on 27 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 6 out of 27
  2. Mixed: 20 out of 27
  3. Negative: 1 out of 27
  1. Reason.com
    Reviewed by: Glenn Garvin
    Sep 22, 2018
    70
    If The Simpsons and Futurama are PG-13 shows, Disenchantment is maybe PG-14, ever-so-slightly sexier and bloodier. Like the other shows, its jokes are more suggestive than bawdy.
    Read full review
  2. IndieWire
    Reviewed by: Ben Travers
    Aug 17, 2018
    58
    In the last three episodes, Disenchantment embraces its story in a way that makes for easy viewing--there’s still nothing revolutionary here, and much of the comedy is still too stagnant, but it’s a far more effective fairy tale.
    Read full review
  3. The Atlantic
    Reviewed by: Sophie Gilbert
    Aug 17, 2018
    50
    Disenchantment just feels full of potential that it hasn’t yet figured out. That’s maybe because it stays very much in safe territory.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »