CSI

CBS | Release Date: October 6, 2000
CRITIC SCORE DISTRIBUTION
65
METASCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 34 Critic Reviews
Positive:
19
Mixed:
15
Negative:
0
Watch Now
Stream On
90
NewsdayDiane WertsJun 13, 2013
Season 1 Review: This eccentric assemblage truly captures the distinct feel of Vegas-the night, the gallows humor of grisly work and the people who thrive on it. Sure, it's seedy, surreal and supremely specific. That's why we're hooked. [6 Oct 2000, p.B51]
83
Seattle Post-IntelligencerJohn LevesqueJun 14, 2013
Season 1 Review: William Petersen and Marg Helgenberger lead an appealing cast, but the real stars are the toenail clippings, hair strands and fingerprints that complete an investigator's puzzle and turn nagging doubt into scientific certainty. [5 Oct 2000, p.E2]
80
The Hollywood ReporterRay RichmondMay 8, 2013
Season 1 Review: The actors, including the charismatic William Petersen and the exquisite Marg Helgenberger, lend credibility to the portrayals that might be indistinct in lesser hands. There's also a compelling, pulsating edge at the outset of CSI that commands instant attention, thanks in part to dynamic work from director Danny Cannon. [5 Oct 2000]
80
Philadelphia InquirerJonathan StormMay 8, 2013
Season 1 Review: CSI doesn't shy from the less savory aspects of the business it covers. There are flashback cams that show the crime taking place and micro cams that look closely at the evidence...But it's kind of tasteful, if you can imagine, and contributes to a Friday night show that is not only entertaining, but might actually teach you a thing or two. [6 Oct 2000]
75
New York PostLinda StasiJun 14, 2013
Season 1 Review: I like the locale a lot. Heading up the forensics team is Gil Grissom (William Petersen), who is appealing mostly because, like James Gandolfini as Tony Soprano, he doesn't look like he belongs on TV. [6 Oct 2000, p.117]
63
USA TodayRobert BiancoJun 14, 2013
Season 1 Review: The camerawork is startling, but it can't hide a plot that is dreary and unbelievable. [6 Oct 2000, p.10E]
63
San Diego Union-TribuneRobert P. LaurenceJun 14, 2013
Season 1 Review: Both stars are capable, the setup a reliable one, but tonight's pilot staggers under an overload of plot. [6 Oct 2000, p.E-1]
60
The New York TimesCaryn JamesMay 8, 2013
Season 1 Review: The lines are too blunt, but with its mix of crime-solving and wit, this series could be the unexpected winner among the new crime shows. [6 Oct 2000, p.E30]
50
Los Angeles TimesHoward RosenbergJun 14, 2013
Season 1 Review: The premiere has a nice look, and its "Rashomon"-style flashbacks are very well shot. It also features a socko ending and one ingenious bit of plotting involving thieving hookers. Yet the storytelling is often muddy, and sorting out characters and determining who does what is more of a challenge than the episode is worth. [6 Oct 2000, p.F1]
50
Detroit Free PressMike DuffyJun 13, 2013
Season 1 Review: Nothing revolutionary here. [6 Oct 2000, p.12D]
50
Cleveland Plain DealerTom FeranJun 13, 2013
Season 1 Review: The setting and crimes are interesting, and Petersen in particular is terrific, but C.S.I. tries to show the thoughtful nature of its characters by underplaying them - and it relies for liveliness on stomach-turning lab work. Slick but plodding, C.S.I. could be DOA. [6 Oct 2000, p.5E]
50
Pittsburgh Post-GazetteRob OwenJun 13, 2013
Season 1 Review: The investigations are intriguing. The investigators are blah, their relationships a poorly defined muddle. [6 Oct 2000, p.44]
50
Miami HeraldTerry JacksonJun 13, 2013
Season 1 Review: By focusing on the science used by crime-scene investigators, C.S.I. puts a creative spin on the traditional cop-show genre. [6 Oct 2000, p.1E]
50
VarietyLaura FriesMay 8, 2013
Season 1 Review: But more often than not CSI isn't sure if it's trying to be intellectual or just sensational. John M. Keane's heavy-handed music, inversely proportional to the events onscreen, doesn't help. Subsequent episodes would do better to pull back on attention-grabbing stunts in favor of the mystery and drama that lies at the core of this premise. [4 Oct 2000, p.2]
50
Chicago Sun-TimesPhil RosenthalMay 8, 2013
Season 1 Review: At times almost downright mesmerizing. But that, even coupled with Marg Helgenberger and William Petersen, is not enough to make CBS' flashy update on "Quincy" engaging. [6 Oct 2000, p.55]
42
Houston ChronicleAnn HodgesJun 14, 2013
Season 1 Review: Once is quite enough to send C.S.I. back to the lab. [6 Oct 2000, p.10]
40
Kansas City StarAaron BarnhartJun 14, 2013
Season 1 Review: We're supposed to buy that the C.S.I. unit is the next wave of high-tech crimefighting, but their tools don't look very high-tech to me. One gizmo looks suspiciously like a canister vacuum cleaner and the only thing it "finds" is a toenail clipping that could've been spotted with the naked eye. [6 Oct 2000, p.E1]
40
Boston GlobeMatthew GilbertJun 13, 2013
Season 1 Review: The science and deduction on C.S.I. is mildly interesting, if grim, but the show's small forensics team, including actors William Petersen and Marg Helgenberger, is as cliched as they come. From the forced co-worker banter to the second-rate office dramas, the ensemble is as lively as a trip to the morgue. [6 Oct 2000, p.D1]
40
Boston HeraldMark A. PerigardMay 8, 2013
Season 1 Review: Why did executive producer Jerry Bruckheimer ("Remember the Titans") populate his CBS series with such revolting characters? With the exception of Marg Helgenberger's harried but compassionate investigator, this is a crew teeming with bullies and psychos. [6 Oct 2000, p.S32]
40
Orlando SentinelHal BoedekerMay 8, 2013
Season 1 Review: A broken toenail, discolored nipples and bullet wounds figure prominently in CBS's CSI. They make deeper impressions than the characters, crime scene investigators in Las Vegas. [6 Oct 2000, p.E1]