• Network: AMC
  • Series Premiere Date: Feb 8, 2015
Season #: 6.5, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
User Score
8.6

Universal acclaim- based on 1191 Ratings

User score distribution:
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Expand

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

  1. Sep 12, 2015
    8
    I thought it would be much more different from Breaking Bad hearing the critics. You still recognize this way of counting a story, this mix of comedy, drama and action which makes me think of Tarantino movies some times. It's a good thing, but it doesn't feel as fresh anymore as when Breaking Bad started. It's still well-written, well-directed, very entertaining.
  2. Feb 29, 2016
    8
    Breaking Bad fans will love this adorable spin-off even if that meant their deaths. Alive or dead, you'll love Better Call Saul at the knee of the television.
  3. Mar 12, 2016
    8
    " Breaking Bad was one of the best tv shows of all time, now couple years later the lawyer Saul Goodman is back in "Better Call Saul". After one season i need to say that better call saul is is surprisingly good, you can't put in a typical genre, that is what makes it so special. Saul is well written and played, the episodes are funny, thrilling and more... So why not? Watch a couple" Breaking Bad was one of the best tv shows of all time, now couple years later the lawyer Saul Goodman is back in "Better Call Saul". After one season i need to say that better call saul is is surprisingly good, you can't put in a typical genre, that is what makes it so special. Saul is well written and played, the episodes are funny, thrilling and more... So why not? Watch a couple episodes and you're a fan of the "old" Saul Godman."

    OVERALL RATING: 8.3
    Expand
  4. Feb 17, 2016
    8
    From someone who really couldn't get into Breaking Bad, I know it's probably a sin to say I really had no interest in it, but I just couldn't get into it after about a season and a half. So I had no desire to watch Better Call Saul until I saw an ad for the new season two days before it started. I decided to see if maybe this show could do for me what Breaking Bad couldn't and wow could itFrom someone who really couldn't get into Breaking Bad, I know it's probably a sin to say I really had no interest in it, but I just couldn't get into it after about a season and a half. So I had no desire to watch Better Call Saul until I saw an ad for the new season two days before it started. I decided to see if maybe this show could do for me what Breaking Bad couldn't and wow could it ever! I love the character of Saul (still James McGill) and I was hooked from the first episode and couldn't stop watching. The entire first season was great aside from a few slow points, but overall was very well done. As someone who has never seen past the first half of season 2 of Breaking Bad, I didn't know much about Saul going into this show but now I want to see more of his character as well as Mike. I watched the entire season in a day and managed to get the first episode of season 2 when it aired and was pleased but it did feel a little lacking compared to the first season. But overall this is an amazing series and shouldn't be missed by anyone. Amazing actors playing very interesting characters, a story that keeps you guessing every episode and it's pretty funny as well. An amazing show all around. Expand
  5. Jun 27, 2016
    8
    It's always difficult to do a good spin-off series and with with Better Call Saul,Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould almost do that.
    Darkly comical and brutal-the impressions one gets after watching the very good first two episodes but from then on it's a bit shaky in between.The ending however was good.
    Don't give up on this spin-off yet.
  6. Dec 18, 2021
    8
    A promising start with a heavy crown it pays no mind to. Knowing Sauls fate doesn't dull the intrigue posed by this prequel which gives us a far cry from the previous Breaking bad character. An obvious standout is Mckean as Chuck who's repulsive personality is made all the more jarring in Jimmy's adoring eyes,their scenes are difficult important viewing. Rhea kim Wexler is the foundationA promising start with a heavy crown it pays no mind to. Knowing Sauls fate doesn't dull the intrigue posed by this prequel which gives us a far cry from the previous Breaking bad character. An obvious standout is Mckean as Chuck who's repulsive personality is made all the more jarring in Jimmy's adoring eyes,their scenes are difficult important viewing. Rhea kim Wexler is the foundation of a abnormally dependable antheisis to Jimmys unpredictable charm and shines on her own apart from being an obvious future love intrest for jimmy.setting up to be an iconic masterful slow burn worthy of its forebearers acclaim. Expand
  7. Dec 6, 2022
    8
    The follow-up to Breaking Bad. Tough shoes to fill. Since everyone is gonna be comparing the two, i will as well. I do not think this was as good as the first episode of Breaking Bad. But in all honesty, that was not gonna happen. Does that make it a bad show? Of course not. This wa
  8. Oct 24, 2022
    8
    This prequel was always going to be compared against the iconic Breaking Bad, but this first season maintains the feel of it's predecessor while at the same time establishing it's own identity.
  9. Apr 11, 2015
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. First off... if you aren't already a fan of the parent show, Breaking Bad, then you may not feel much of a connection to this one. You would especially miss the importance of various characters from the BB world making their appearance, and the emotional impact you are expected to feel.

    Overall, this show is Vince Gilligan at his most methodical; the plot is a very slow burn. My SO and I have said several times to each other, throughout season 1, "Wow, I hope they're going somewhere with this...." The story does feel like it meanders like a lazy river.

    Not that this is a bad series. It's actually quite good. Odenkirk's Saul Goodman was possibly my favorite character on Breaking Bad. And once Mike Ehrmantrout makes his appearance, things start to move. In fact, the episode dealing with Mike's backstory is one of the best TV episodes I've ever seen (really).

    I guess where the show isn't connecting with me yet is that the Saul Goodman character is such a slick, fast talking, shady guy with all the wrong connections. I like Jimmy McGill... but I LOVE Saul Goodman. And we don't really get to see Saul in season 1.
    Expand
  10. Aug 11, 2016
    7
    This was a really great show up until the very last episode, when they decided to try to go for the drama finisher. It's a much more refined version of Breaking Bad, touching on all of the same points but with more realistic characters and situations. Unfortunately that last episode just left me with a huge amount of disappointment. I really thought they weren't just going to fall for theThis was a really great show up until the very last episode, when they decided to try to go for the drama finisher. It's a much more refined version of Breaking Bad, touching on all of the same points but with more realistic characters and situations. Unfortunately that last episode just left me with a huge amount of disappointment. I really thought they weren't just going to fall for the drama tropes and then they pulled the biggest one in the book.

    Worth a watch up until that last episode. You can just kinda pretend it doesn't even exist.
    Expand
  11. Feb 12, 2015
    7
    |||||||||Only 2 Episodes into series|||||||||| I really want to like it but I feel as though I am watching some show made by guys who watched Breaking Bad but somehow missed something when trying to recreate it. I know its the same guys, but just something is missing thus far. Hopefully it will start to shine soon once the writers get done with their "We don't think the audience will like|||||||||Only 2 Episodes into series|||||||||| I really want to like it but I feel as though I am watching some show made by guys who watched Breaking Bad but somehow missed something when trying to recreate it. I know its the same guys, but just something is missing thus far. Hopefully it will start to shine soon once the writers get done with their "We don't think the audience will like this character if we don't show his humble beginnings when he once stood on the decent side of the moral compass" type crap. So far... Meh... but it shows great promise. And yea, all the 10's at this point in the series are from fanboys or people who work on the show. Disregard them. Expand
  12. Feb 9, 2015
    7
    I'm not going to compare this with Breaking Bad. It is a spin-off, yes, but it only features a couple of the same characters, it's set in a different time, it doesn't deal (I'm assuming) with the same things. Instead, I'm going to review this as if it were a stand-alone show.

    The series starts off in the right direction, promising enthralling plot and even some directorial odd choices,
    I'm not going to compare this with Breaking Bad. It is a spin-off, yes, but it only features a couple of the same characters, it's set in a different time, it doesn't deal (I'm assuming) with the same things. Instead, I'm going to review this as if it were a stand-alone show.

    The series starts off in the right direction, promising enthralling plot and even some directorial odd choices, it being a TV show: we see black and white, we see weird interruptions, long scenes and so on, stuff that normally belongs in movies. Bob Odenkirk has a combination of manic, sad, foolish, hilarious charisma that isn't that common to find, and he sets off to nail his dubious character of a broke lawyer turned fraudolent defendant of the crooks.

    A closer look at the technical aspects, as I mentioned, also reveals a particular attention for detail that can never hurt. We'll see where this goes.
    Expand
  13. Feb 11, 2015
    7
    I must admit to not having been a great fan of "Breaking Bad". When I decided to really check it out with a few episodes, I did like it but the show was too far along to try to catch up. So, I felt that I had to start with "Better Call Saul" right at the beginning.

    I did enjoy the first episode. I have not yet seen the second episode with is snuggly waiting in my DVR. The found the
    I must admit to not having been a great fan of "Breaking Bad". When I decided to really check it out with a few episodes, I did like it but the show was too far along to try to catch up. So, I felt that I had to start with "Better Call Saul" right at the beginning.

    I did enjoy the first episode. I have not yet seen the second episode with is snuggly waiting in my DVR. The found the first half of the first episode totally intriguing. But then Chuck came into the show. I am not sure what his problem is but I found the character bland and annoying. If I had followed "Breaking Bad" maybe I would know who Chuck is and why he is, but It seems to me that prior knowledge of "BB" should absolutely not be required to enjoy "BCS". Too much of this may eventually put me off of this show. I hope not!
    Expand
  14. Aug 6, 2015
    7
    It's very different compared to Breaking Bad, however Jimmy McGill's adventures can more than stand tall on their own. The dark humour of Breaking Bad finds it's way into BCS as well, much to my delight. However this is very much a drama series at heart and an impressive one at that. The motivation that drives McGill gives us a new look at his character, one never seen in Breaking Bad asIt's very different compared to Breaking Bad, however Jimmy McGill's adventures can more than stand tall on their own. The dark humour of Breaking Bad finds it's way into BCS as well, much to my delight. However this is very much a drama series at heart and an impressive one at that. The motivation that drives McGill gives us a new look at his character, one never seen in Breaking Bad as he desperately bids to prove himself to his brother, Chuck. Their relationship is very much the driving force behind most of the show and it is a relationship that can get complicated mainly due to a lot of back story. When we are granted with insight their relationship provides gripping drama come the season's end. Better Call Saul is a smart and beautiful show with interesting characters, themes and history all of which easily retain viewer interest. The past has a big role to play here and flashback scenes only work to further engage us. Expand
  15. Jan 15, 2019
    7
    Somehow captivating.

    I didn't watch Breaking Bad closely. When I did watch it, I liked it but not enough to get fully hooked. But, the idea of making a show about the sleazy (hilarious) lawyer who enabled the people in a hit show felt compelling to me. Without really planning on it, I watched every episode of Better Call Saul season one. I found it to be placid but mesmerizing.
    Somehow captivating.

    I didn't watch Breaking Bad closely. When I did watch it, I liked it but not enough to get fully hooked. But, the idea of making a show about the sleazy (hilarious) lawyer who enabled the people in a hit show felt compelling to me. Without really planning on it, I watched every episode of Better Call Saul season one.

    I found it to be placid but mesmerizing. Someone else I knew who was A huge fan of Breaking Bad thought it was a total snooze fest - and refused to watch it. I can see where both the good and bad reviewers are coming from.

    Bottom line: Slow with top shelf acting. The setting, characters, and atmosphere are convincing.
    Expand
  16. egg
    May 2, 2015
    7
    Alright, it was good. For the most part. The quality of writing is definitely there and it's nice to see old faces come back from Breaking Bad, and some new ones. The characters are all good and well developed and interesting, but I have one qualm. It didn't really know what it was, or where it was going. The story seemed like it was going somewhere then it just petered out and I feltAlright, it was good. For the most part. The quality of writing is definitely there and it's nice to see old faces come back from Breaking Bad, and some new ones. The characters are all good and well developed and interesting, but I have one qualm. It didn't really know what it was, or where it was going. The story seemed like it was going somewhere then it just petered out and I felt really unresolved at the end. I felt like there was still more to do, and I'm sure series two will wrap some of that up, but as an individual season, I didn't think it was too strong. To tell the truth, I watched all episodes as they came out, and didn't even realise it was finished until now. Still, I'll bump it for potential next season, but please bring a coherent story this time rather than just a bunch of different story threads that lead nowhere. Expand
  17. Mar 19, 2015
    7
    I'm a crazy fan of Breaking Bad and this is an unbiased opinion: BCS is good because it has all the good Breaking Bad characters in it: Saul, Mike, Tuco,.. But it's own characters: Chuck, Kim,Hamlin,..Let's be real, they are tedious. And so far, except every scene that Mike involve in, the rest of it is kinda boring.But I hope they will manage to raise the pulse in the future, like theyI'm a crazy fan of Breaking Bad and this is an unbiased opinion: BCS is good because it has all the good Breaking Bad characters in it: Saul, Mike, Tuco,.. But it's own characters: Chuck, Kim,Hamlin,..Let's be real, they are tedious. And so far, except every scene that Mike involve in, the rest of it is kinda boring.But I hope they will manage to raise the pulse in the future, like they did with Breaking Bad Expand
  18. Feb 11, 2015
    7
    This spinoff is quite entertaining but it fails to fly for itself and it looks very similar to breaking bad for now. Saul starts just as Walter, he is an underachiever tired of his life and willing to take the fast lane to change it.

    Este spinoff es entretenido pero no logra volar por si mismo, tomando mucho de Breaking Bad, al menos por ahora. El comienzo de la historia de Saul es
    This spinoff is quite entertaining but it fails to fly for itself and it looks very similar to breaking bad for now. Saul starts just as Walter, he is an underachiever tired of his life and willing to take the fast lane to change it.

    Este spinoff es entretenido pero no logra volar por si mismo, tomando mucho de Breaking Bad, al menos por ahora. El comienzo de la historia de Saul es prácticamente el mismo de Walter, es un mediocre cansado de su vida y dispuesto a tomar el camino rápido para mejorarla.
    Expand
  19. Apr 2, 2023
    7
    "Better Call Saul" is distinct from its predecessor, but in a positive manner. It is unquestionably a fitting follow-up to "Breaking Bad"! The cinematography, writing, and editing are all extraordinary. We are incredibly fortunate to have been gifted with such a high-caliber spin-off. While the show may be slower in pace than "Breaking Bad," it adds considerable depth to the universe and"Better Call Saul" is distinct from its predecessor, but in a positive manner. It is unquestionably a fitting follow-up to "Breaking Bad"! The cinematography, writing, and editing are all extraordinary. We are incredibly fortunate to have been gifted with such a high-caliber spin-off. While the show may be slower in pace than "Breaking Bad," it adds considerable depth to the universe and characters. Expand
  20. Jul 18, 2015
    6
    I find 'Better Call Saul' an incredibly frustrating experience, much like the time I invested in 'Breaking Bad'. As with it's predecessor, 'Better Call Saul' has moments that are fantastically written, thoroughly entertaining and brilliantly acted out. However, for every one of these moments, there's at least 15 minutes of can be loosely classed as character development, but is more akinI find 'Better Call Saul' an incredibly frustrating experience, much like the time I invested in 'Breaking Bad'. As with it's predecessor, 'Better Call Saul' has moments that are fantastically written, thoroughly entertaining and brilliantly acted out. However, for every one of these moments, there's at least 15 minutes of can be loosely classed as character development, but is more akin to filler material. In short, the show is slow. I found that these personal gripes with the writing and execution to be present in 'Breaking Bad', but I managed to persevere as, broadly, the series was more engaging.

    It may be that Vince Gilligan's work just doesn't quite cut it for me, in 'Better Call Saul' (more than with, but still present in, 'Breaking Bad') I can't shake the feeling of certain parts being contrived and the show carrying an air of pretension.

    However, the acting is solid and cannot be faulted; with Bob Odenkirk really pulling off the multiple dimensions to Jimmy's character. As with the acting, the cinematography and music are brilliant, but this is, in my opinion, to be expected when you're following up one of the biggest TV shows of all time.

    To the show's credit, it makes the series accessible to those who haven't seen 'Breaking Bad'. This being said, those that haven't seen the series may have certain elements of the show and cameos lost on them. I did feel that at one time in particular, a cameo was a cheap way to get people interested and was somewhat shoe-horned into an already meandering and muddled storyline (i.e. 'Oh look who's here! It's this character from 'Breaking Bad' - weren't they great!').

    Would I recommend 'Better Call Saul'? I wouldn't steer people away from the series, but there's much better television out there (i.e. House of Cards, Orange Is The New Black). You need patience for 'Better Call Saul', and you need to be willing to invest the time for not much reward - as I felt the series only just got going in the final episode, but this may set up season 2 well.
    Expand
  21. Feb 19, 2015
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This whole show seems a bit farcical. As we know Saul turns out more or less okay (and alive) by the beginning of Breaking Bad, the tension is completely taken out of any life threatening scenes. We also know he has contact with drug cartels in Breaking Bad, which makes the show somewhat predictable - very much unlike Breaking Bad.

    This is a spin off show, and one that lacks the heart, energy, and excitement of the original.
    Expand
  22. Jan 4, 2023
    6
    I gotta be honest. I thought that this season was okay. Not really what I expected, but okay. I didn't really enjoy it that much, probably because I thought it was gonna be like breaking bad, but I was completely wrong. It is one of the weaker seasons in the bb universe.
  23. Mar 1, 2015
    5
    Even not comparing this to Breaking Bad, this is very slow paced and a bit all over the place. The acting is OK but boring, they do not jump off the screen at you.

    The story line, is as I said, slow paced and really does not develop the characters much. Yes we know who the main characters are and we are waiting for them to start to be what they were in BB, which is not occurring. I know
    Even not comparing this to Breaking Bad, this is very slow paced and a bit all over the place. The acting is OK but boring, they do not jump off the screen at you.

    The story line, is as I said, slow paced and really does not develop the characters much. Yes we know who the main characters are and we are waiting for them to start to be what they were in BB, which is not occurring. I know they are building towards that, but really why wait.
    Expand
  24. Feb 14, 2015
    5
    the attempt to humanize saul is terrible and, IMHO, is not consistent with the character that we all loved in breaking bad. probably the writers recovered some stuffs that wrote about the biography at the time of bb. and then they tried to develop it. (this means, perhaps, that the alchemy of a good character can't be justified only by the good work made.) but the series is totallythe attempt to humanize saul is terrible and, IMHO, is not consistent with the character that we all loved in breaking bad. probably the writers recovered some stuffs that wrote about the biography at the time of bb. and then they tried to develop it. (this means, perhaps, that the alchemy of a good character can't be justified only by the good work made.) but the series is totally watchable. yes. but that man is not the saul goodman that we love. (ok, sorry for my english, I'm italian.) Expand
  25. Feb 18, 2015
    5
    If you where on IMDB when this show aired you would've noticed this show had a 9.5 before it was even 10 minutes in. It goes to show people are rating this show based on how much they liked breaking bad. the first episode was wildly mediocre but the show started to pick up in episode 2. so far the acting is good and the cast isn't terrible. episode 3 was rather predictable. if it continuesIf you where on IMDB when this show aired you would've noticed this show had a 9.5 before it was even 10 minutes in. It goes to show people are rating this show based on how much they liked breaking bad. the first episode was wildly mediocre but the show started to pick up in episode 2. so far the acting is good and the cast isn't terrible. episode 3 was rather predictable. if it continues as it is i don't have very high hopes for it but if it picks up i will be pleased and surprised. Expand
  26. Feb 25, 2015
    5
    As a Breaking Bad addict, I thought Vince Gilligan was near genius, but he choose the wrong character to make into a leading man in his new series. Yes, the acting is excellent, the sets are great, but the plot just doesn't hold my attention. I really wish I could like this but it ain't happening, at least not yet.
  27. Jan 28, 2016
    5
    As a series, it's aimless and strange. Plotlines go nowhere, characters are forgotten, all in aid of Jimmy never becoming too happy or successful to become the Saul Goodman character in Breaking Bad.
    Any one of these episodes could easily be part of a great series, but the prequel concept is severely limiting, and what results is a jerky season full of sharp left turns and hastily
    As a series, it's aimless and strange. Plotlines go nowhere, characters are forgotten, all in aid of Jimmy never becoming too happy or successful to become the Saul Goodman character in Breaking Bad.
    Any one of these episodes could easily be part of a great series, but the prequel concept is severely limiting, and what results is a jerky season full of sharp left turns and hastily abandoned arcs. Odenkirk is great; the writing is not.
    Expand
  28. Mar 3, 2015
    4
    I am truly baffled by all the high scores this show is receiving.
    Aimless, pointless and void of any real depth or complexity, i (for some odd reason) continue to watch this show, hoping for some semblance of intrigue or a developing story line.
    Instead, what we have here is TV series that obviously is trying to skate by based solely on its association with the brilliant Breaking Bad.
    I am truly baffled by all the high scores this show is receiving.
    Aimless, pointless and void of any real depth or complexity, i (for some odd reason) continue to watch this show, hoping for some semblance of intrigue or a developing story line.
    Instead, what we have here is TV series that obviously is trying to skate by based solely on its association with the brilliant Breaking Bad.
    Unfortunately for me, that just doesn't cut it.
    Expand
  29. Feb 16, 2016
    4
    I just can't really tell where they are trying to go with this show anymore. Stop dragging it out and get on with it or you'll probably start losing viewers.
  30. Jun 10, 2015
    3
    To much talking and no action....as in anything happening..... sadly !

    After 2 episodes i gave up and stop watching. and i have to write 150 chars to post.......
  31. Feb 21, 2018
    3
    I can't understand why this show is rated so high, It has great production values and the actors are very professional, but it has no verve, no energy, no pulse. In short, boring and tedious...
  32. Mar 30, 2015
    0
    As a fan of Breaking Bad, I can't recommend this show. As a fan of television and film in general, I still couldn't recommend it. Despite having a great cast, colorful characters, well-shot scenes and some naturally flowing dialogue, this show falls flat. Why? To be quite honest, simply nothing of interest happens. We see Saul as Jimmy McGill, doing lawyer stuff, paperwork, and most oftenAs a fan of Breaking Bad, I can't recommend this show. As a fan of television and film in general, I still couldn't recommend it. Despite having a great cast, colorful characters, well-shot scenes and some naturally flowing dialogue, this show falls flat. Why? To be quite honest, simply nothing of interest happens. We see Saul as Jimmy McGill, doing lawyer stuff, paperwork, and most often playing bingo with old people. I can't tell you what the plot is besides this, because there is none. There's no goal, no progress, no motivation. The show doesn't even have a clear antagonist or obstacle. Eight episodes in and no overarching plot has developed, just a series of individual problems that are solved by the end of the episode's self-contained story. There's only two episodes left and still nothing is at stake. There's no reason for me to root for Jimmy, to be concerned for him, to fear for him. There's no urge to see what happens, because NOTHING is happening. It's a shame to see such potential be wasted. Expand
  33. Jun 6, 2017
    0
    if you are thinking about starting this show... don't. Every story line is boring, long, and drawn out and the characters are not interesting. Trying to cash in on breaking bad and doing it poorly.
  34. Apr 14, 2017
    0
    Waited a year for season 3 and its still painfully SLOW. The first two seasons could've been achieved in two shows. Unrelated sequencing, slow to no story. Very disappointing. I've official stopped watching.
Metascore
78

Generally favorable reviews - based on 43 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 40 out of 43
  2. Negative: 0 out of 43
  1. Reviewed by: Marlow Stern
    Feb 9, 2015
    80
    The ball of manic, depressed, negative energy that is Jimmy is a perfect match for Odenkirk’s comedic (and newfound dramatic) chops, as he lends plenty of pathos to this mesmeric loser with a heart of fool’s gold. He’s not Saul Goodman just yet, but the journey there should be a bumpy, thrilling ride.
  2. Reviewed by: Kristi Turnquist
    Feb 9, 2015
    70
    Odenkirk is a gifted comic actor, and the sadness in his eyes hints that he can fill in more dimensions to Jimmy McGill as time goes on. But the first two episodes of Better Call Saul take their own sweet time setting things up.
  3. Reviewed by: Ken Tucker
    Feb 9, 2015
    90
    Better Call Saul has its own tone--it's a different, unique creation.