FOX | Netflix | Release Date: November 2, 2003
CRITIC SCORE DISTRIBUTION
78
METASCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 90 Critic Reviews
Positive:
72
Mixed:
17
Negative:
1
Watch Now
Stream On
100
San Francisco ChronicleTim GoodmanMay 26, 2013
Season 2 Review: This is one of maybe six or so elite series on all of television that you should absolutely be watching. Pitch-perfect acting (ensemble stars Jason Bateman and Jessica Walter were robbed of Emmys) and nuanced writing that staggers you with its cleverness and lunacy makes this more than a typical dysfunctional-family sitcom. [3 Nov 2004, p.E1]
100
VarietyPhil GalloMay 26, 2013
Season 2 Review: The reigning Emmy comedy champ debuts its second season with an episode that may well be its funniest... TV bar's for comedy has been raised again. [5 Nov 2004, p.4]
100
Washington PostTom ShalesMay 26, 2013
Season 2 Review: Arrested Development is, in fact, "Dynasty" as it might be rewritten for the Three Stooges if there were a dozen of them...Sly, wild, clever and just plain nuts, Arrested Development makes you think as it makes you laugh, and one of the things it makes you think is, "Why the hell am I laughing?" Deep in your subconscious, you know. You've slipped on the appeal of a frozen banana. [6 Nov 2004, p.C01]
100
Arizona RepublicBill GoodykoontzMay 26, 2013
Season 2 Review: What a brilliant, hilarious treasure this show is, a real work of skewed art. It's also the last, best argument against the assertion that comedy is dead on TV. Watch a couple of episodes of Arrested Development and you'll be convinced it's not even ailing. [7 Nov 2004, p.1E]
100
Boston GlobeMatthew GilbertMay 26, 2013
Season 2 Review: The future of TV comedy is a sick one, my friends. A gloriously, brilliantly, deliriously sick one, where a desperate housewife wears a "SLUT" T-shirt on a prison visit, a businessman sells prefab homes to Saddam Hussein, and a pudgy teen lusts after his first cousin. It's a ferociously Freudian future, replete with a pent-up mama's boy, a family-run banana stand, and a disbarred psychiatrist who wears cutoffs beneath his underwear because he's a "Never-nude." That's a phobia about nakedness he's trying to make into a nationally recognized condition...In short, it's Arrested Development. [7 Nov 2004, p.N4]
100
Denver PostJoanne OstrowMay 26, 2013
Season 2 Review: Part of what makes his series hilarious is the riotous pace and innovative comedic rhythms that sneak up on viewers. This distinctive style is as different from TV's old "Laverne & Shirley" model as third-wave ska is from Perry Como. [7 Nov 2004, p.F-15]
100
Newark Star-LedgerAlan SepinwallMay 26, 2013
Season 1 Review: If you enjoy seeing wealthy, petty people get their deserved comeuppance, this is the show for you. If you enjoy laughing, this is definitely the show for you - the funniest new comedy of the season by a wide margin...For a show about dumb, unfocused people, Arrested Development is wickedly smart and quick, willing to go anywhere for a good gag. [31 Oct 2003, p.49]
100
Cleveland Plain DealerMark DawidziakMay 26, 2013
Season 1 Review: Generous with the laughs. A wonderfully quirky and stylish series from a creative team headed by director-producer Ron Howard, this isn't merely the best new comedy of the season. It's the best new show of any kind.[2 Nov 2003, p.J1]
100
St. Louis Post-DispatchGail PenningtonMay 26, 2013
Season 1 Review: The best new sitcom to come along in years. [2 Nov 2003, p.C4]
100
NewsdayDiane WertsMay 26, 2013
Season 1 Review: Nobody tries to be funny here, so they're more hysterical than the folks falling all over themselves elsewhere. They're simply hopeless specimens of spoiled humanity who haven't a clue how to operate in the real world. [2 Nov 2003, p.04]
100
Miami HeraldGlenn GarvinMay 26, 2013
Season 1 Review: News bulletin: We've finally found the weapons of mass destruction, or at least one of them. The jokes fly like shrapnel in Fox's dangerously hilarious new sitcom Arrested Development, and, like shrapnel, they often draw blood...A scathingly, unnervingly comic riff on stupidity and greed in the corporate world, Arrested Development is something like a National Lampoon's Wall Street Vacation, painting its targets variously as buffoonish or malefic, but always hitting them dead-center. [2 Nov 2003, p.3M]
100
Dallas Morning NewsEd BarkMay 26, 2013
Season 1 Review: A smart, tart, daring comedy in a season that could really use one. Arrested Development and Mr. Bateman both deserve a long and prosperous run. What a nice, bracing development that would be. [2 Nov 2003, p.3]
100
Denver PostJoanne OstrowMay 26, 2013
Season 1 Review: The season's best new comedy - we're talking laugh-out-loud funny. [2 Nov 2003, p.F-14]
91
San Jose Mercury News/Contra Costa TimesChuck BarneyMay 26, 2013
Season 2 Review: The good news is that it's still got game. [7 Nov 2004, p.C09]
91
San Jose Mercury News/Contra Costa TimesCharlie McCollumMay 26, 2013
Season 1 Review: The one truly original new show this season and certainly the funniest comedy. It is outrageous. It is odd. It is fresh. It is smart. And, given the track record of such refreshingly sophisticated comedies on network TV, it will be lucky to last three episodes. [31 Oct 2003, p.9E]
90
Pittsburgh Post-GazetteRob OwenMay 26, 2013
Season 2 Review: An uncommon comedy. Its rhythm is less jokey and requires a little more effort on the part of viewers, but the comedic payoff is better, too...I begged viewers to watch this series last year, and I'm not averse to doing it again: Please watch. If not for yourself, do it for me; if the ratings are low, Fox might replace it with yet another edition of "The Simple Life," and that's not good for anybody. [5 Nov 2004, p.WE-41]
90
Chicago TribuneMaureen RyanMay 26, 2013
Season 2 Review: For all their foibles, the Bluth family seems more real than most stale sitcom clans; the looks that they give each other are recognizable to anyone who has ever been embarrassed or just weirded out by the behavior of the people they love. [5 Nov 2004, p.5]
90
Dallas Morning NewsManuel MendozaMay 26, 2013
Season 2 Review: If the season premiere is any sign, Arrested Development is going to be just as wacky as last season. [6 Nov 2004, p.13E]
90
VarietyMichael SpeierMay 26, 2013
Season 1 Review: With faith in its own inspired goofiness, the net's newest Sunday entry reinvents what works --- and mocks what doesn't --- within the confines of the undernourished sitcom world. Critics and viewers clamoring for something unique since the sesh began back in August finally have something to champion ... and boy, is it funny.
90
Seattle Post-IntelligencerMelanie McFarlandMay 26, 2013
Season 1 Review: Arrested Development has been hyped to the clouds in a number of ads, all piling on critical encomiums from all over the country. This time they're telling the truth. [31 Oct 2003, p.E1]
90
Los Angeles TimesRobert LloydMay 26, 2013
Season 1 Review: For all its willful outrageousness, Arrested Development is sort of gripping -- a continuing story that one actually wants to see continue, which is more than can be said of most of the new dramas the season produced. [31 Oct 2003, p.E1]
90
Deseret NewsScott D. PierceMay 26, 2013
Season 1 Review: Bateman is a revelation -- the ex-child star is great in this show. The rest of the cast is also very good, the writing is sharp, the humor level is high and it succeeds in creating a different comedy look and style. [31 Oct 2003, p.C08]
90
Chicago TribuneSteve JohnsonMay 26, 2013
Season 1 Review: This is compelling in both the broad strokes and the little details. The funny thing is, even at its most absurd, it feels almost realistic, because Hurwitz so precisely sketches his characters and their setting. [1 Nov 2003, p.27]
88
Chicago Sun-TimesPhil RosenthalMay 26, 2013
Season 2 Review: Funny stuff. Now if only it could find an audience. [5 Nov 2004, p.51]
88
San Diego Union-TribuneRobert P. LaurenceMay 26, 2013
Season 1 Review: The funniest, hippest and most imaginative new comedy on any network this fall. [31 Oct 2003, p.E-11]
80
Pittsburgh Post-GazetteRob OwenMay 26, 2013
Season 1 Review: With its depiction of a warped, absurd family, Arrested Development is worth watching for fans of out-there comedy. [2 Nov 2003, p.TV-5]
75
Detroit Free PressMike DuffyMay 26, 2013
Season 1 Review: Arrested Development is one of those increasingly rare network comedy series that dares to assume there might be intelligent life out there watching, viewers who actually know when to laugh. Bless you, Fox. [31 Oct 2003, p.1H]
75
Boston HeraldMonica CollinsMay 26, 2013
Season 1 Review: What a dazzling bunch of jerks. Yet, somehow, they are family and you can't help but laugh at them. Arrested Development is so dopey - but slick dopey. [2 Nov 2003, p.39]
60
New York Daily NewsDavid BianculliMay 26, 2013
Season 2 Review: Even if you're confused when tuning in as a first-timer, it's a lot better than not tuning in at all. [4 Nov 2004, p.103]
60
NewsdayNoel HolstonMay 26, 2013
Season 2 Review: But my ultimate test for any comedy is - what else? - "Does it make me laugh?" Arrested Development seldom does. Not loudly, anyway...It has neither the liberating audacity of HBO's "Curb Your Enthusiasm" nor the delirious, anything-for-a-laugh energy of NBC's "Scrubs," the two contemporary comedies that consistently crack me up. It's reminiscent of the taboo- breaking 1970s comedy serial "Soap," but drier, more deadpan, and with less endearing characters. Does it deserve a wider audience than it has gotten? Sure. But I can't imagine it becoming a mainstream hit for Fox like "The Simpsons" or "Malcolm in the Middle."
60
Orlando SentinelHal BoedekerMay 26, 2013
Season 1 Review: Despite some amusing bits involving the parents, there's a major problem: Arrested Development isn't especially funny. That's the one asset every successful sitcom must have. [2 Nov 2003, p.4]
40
Philadelphia InquirerJonathan StormMay 26, 2013
Season 1 Review: A marvelous cast, including Jeffrey Tambor, Jason Bateman, Portia de Rossi, Jessica Walter and Alia Shawkat. Offbeat situations and innovative direction. Your humble critic, however, finds one problem: It's not very funny. [2 Nov 2003, p.H01]