Archive 81

Netflix | Release Date: January 14, 2022

6.8	USER SCORE Generally favorable reviews based on 25 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Watch Now

Stream On

Review this TV Series

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

ThisGuy1Jan 18, 2022

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This was oh so close to an 8 or even a 9 out of 10. I was hooked by the end of episode 1. I watched three episodes one night and couldn't wait, so I watched the rest of the season the next day - finishing the series in one weekend. There were so many good characters, good acting, a preferred blend of atmospheric scares (lots) vs jump scares (enough to enjoy without getting bored/cheap), and several great mysteries. Outside of the finale, my only complaint was some of the dialogue. I'm not offended by swearing. However, there were several instances in the show where the swearing felt out of place. One of the main characters would be talking to another character - either someone trying to help them or a creepy "bad guy," but regardless, this character would be calmly talking to the main character - and rather than keeping their cool and keeping control of the conversation in order to get the answers to their questions, the main characters would scream/yell "WHY THE F--- blah blah blah?!" These moments would almost always pull me from being immersed in the show. Even so, not a huge concern and nothing that impacted my review.

Now, the finale did cause me to lower the rating of the show. It failed to execute. It answered just enough questions, but in incredibly lazy ways. By the end of the finale, I had more questions criticizing the finale than I did about the rest of the series. How/Why did Virgil - a man who owned a DNA/Ancestry business so he could find out about people's lineage - end up hiring the mom of the woman who he thought murdered (or caused the disappearance of) his brother? I may have missed it, but how did the portal open without a sacrifice (the caretaker/mom cut her hand to bleed on the statue and they took a jar of blood from the fridge, but I didn't see them spill any blood from the jar)? At the end, there were two rooms with lights (presumable portals), Melody was pulled into one by Samuel, then the light faded (presumably meaning the portals shut). Dan wasn't in a portal before the light faded, so how did Dan end up in 1994 (the writers have confirmed he IS in 1994 and not the other world)? Why did Melody arrive in the present but not Samuel when they were clearly in the same portal? So - after 7 hours of wondering who or what burned down Samuel's house with his family in it, which was eerily similar to how the Voss mansion burned down and the Visser apartment complex - the writers expected fans to be satisfied with Virgil's explanation for how Samuel's house burned down?! "The cult would do anything to bring the demon to our world, the coven would do anything to prevent it - and your family got caught in the crossfires." Sounds like a lazy excuse to avoid providing answers, most likely because the writers didn't think that far out in advance. Lastly - the finale neutered the primary antagonist. The demon's parallel world was essentially just a maze and instead of killing, torturing, or anything malevolent related to the people who get trapped there - he simply lets them exist and doesn't want them to leave because he's lonely? He poses no threat to the any of the characters and barely even attempts to prevent them from leaving. Kind of makes the entire conflict between the coven and the cult - who cares, let Kaleago into our world. Dude is just lonely and looks like a mouthless predator. Let him move to Vegas and be a magician. At least then the cult and coven will stop sacrificing people and burning down buildings.

The writer's have said they will address Samuel not being in the room at the end and the true cause of Samuel's house burning down in season 2 if it's greenlit - but I still believe these were errors (a mistake and a case of lazy writing) on the part of the creative team behind the show. And now that it's being called out as the shows only big flaw, the writers are scrambling to tease future corrections.

NOTE: Even after all of that is said... this show was obviously very enjoyable as I gave it a 7 out of 10. I would 100% watch a season 2 and hope they fix a lot of issues created by the finale.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

Toni45161Jan 17, 2022

It's gripping and engaging. Twists and turns that one wouldn't expect. A perfect mix of horror, thriller and the psychological. It's fresh and captures the viewer from the get go. It's impossible not to binge watch, the acting performance wasIt's gripping and engaging. Twists and turns that one wouldn't expect. A perfect mix of horror, thriller and the psychological. It's fresh and captures the viewer from the get go. It's impossible not to binge watch, the acting performance was flawless and the visuals add to the total immersion. A throughly impressive show from start to finish, the wait for season two will be a hardship.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

BOWiJan 22, 2022

I watched the whole thing because I thought that watching something different would be interesting, but the mysteries ended up being meaningless and I really regret giving a chance to this show. Most episodes were bad. The motivations of eachI watched the whole thing because I thought that watching something different would be interesting, but the mysteries ended up being meaningless and I really regret giving a chance to this show. Most episodes were bad. The motivations of each characters are unclear, which makes it impossible for us to feel engaged to them. The story, the screenplay, and the dialogues are so full of plot holes and non-sense that it is also nearly impossible to intellectually or emotionally engage with the series. I wish Netlix would bring back The OA instead of this. Also, other series like Dark are WAY better when with sci-fi, drama and investigation.

Some professional critics wrote that the show relies on our suspension of disbelief, but I think it relies on us switching our brain totally off. What a bad series! I kinda hope it get cancelled otherwise it's an insult to the OA.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

CasandraComplexSep 14, 2022

I would give this an even lower score if I could .. Dear Hollywood; there is a difference between creating suspense with minimalism and just plain have absolutely NOTHING TO SAY and zero sense of atmosphere. This is one of those shows thatI would give this an even lower score if I could .. Dear Hollywood; there is a difference between creating suspense with minimalism and just plain have absolutely NOTHING TO SAY and zero sense of atmosphere. This is one of those shows that starts out with the painfully slow pacing that is a technique to create suspense but then other methods are used to suspend the suspense. Here its just like watching a superstitious friend stare into an empty closet convincing her self that there is something in there when there is nothing. The pacing and pathetic offerings serve to be nothing more than annoying. Its like watching The Blair Twitt project mixed with Paranormal.. all a bunch of idiots bumbling around in collective hysteria. Come on baby, do the camera shake! Thats excellant story telling technique right there.… Expand