For 11,478 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
46% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
52% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 5.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 60
| Highest review score: | Oppenheimer | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Dolittle |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 6,014 out of 11478
-
Mixed: 3,069 out of 11478
-
Negative: 2,395 out of 11478
11478
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- Critic Score
The real world has caught up with him, and [Waters'] off-kilter comedy seems disappointingly mundane and mainstream.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
Director John Dahl and his brother Rick Dahl co-wrote the intelligent and off-handedly witty script; they're like the Coen brothers, but with a sense of fun and a coherent, entertaining story to tell.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Desson Thomson
An enormously enjoyable gothic yarn from Mexico, transfuses the genre with wry grotesquerie, but retains respect for the old, classic films.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
David Zucker and Segal seem to thrive on the formulaic tomfoolery that propels these rapid-fire spoofs. Naked Gun 33 1/3, as pointlessly plotted as ever, manages to be not only still funny but energetically slapped together and occasionally inventive.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
It's an exhausting and exhilarating movie about the birth of "the daily miracle." Thanks to a caffeinated cast and hyperactive script, director Ron Howard delivers The Paper with a bang.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
With its musty scenario of a dissolute middle-aged man and a clingy, devouring child-woman, 60-year-old co-writer/director/producer Polanski's film smacks of wish-fulfillment and self-justification.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
All of the supporting characters -- notably tubby Richard Griffiths as Tess's nurse and mousy Austin Pendleton as her chauffeur -- are thinly drawn, but neither MacLaine nor Cage leaves much room for anyone to overact.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Another ultra-stylized movie-about-movies by the Cannes-winning Coen Brothers, Hudsucker is clever but cold, a heartless mechanical gizmo. The actors rattle around tinnily like shiny marbles inside its cavernous sets and hollow script.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
Unfortunately, this loosen-up-Sandy-baby allegory, full of heavyhanded sexual/mythic symbols is more of a poetic nudist's delight than a movie. Its characters (from fussy Grant to voluptuous MacPherson) are only mildly appealing. Writer/director John Duigan, maker of the charming Flirting, took a recent tumble with The Wide Sargasso Sea. He has yet to regain his footing.- Washington Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Hal Hinson
As it unreels, The Ref keeps getting dumber, and, unfortunately, it simply wasn't that brilliant to begin with.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
A movie to cheer you up and on and help you feel that spring will, in fact, arrive before we are all too desiccated to enjoy it.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Desson Thomson
What's Eating Gilbert Grape is a tad too precious. One of those movies that wants to address life's quaint wackinesses, it's full of characters who are quirky, lonely, bizarre or retarded. There's something intensely earnest about the project. But there's something equally manufactured, starting with the casting of Johnny Depp and Juliette Lewis.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
Sugar Hill is often more unflinching in its detailing of the death trip drugs provoke -- a pair of overdoses are particularly harrowing and the gun-violence is sufficiently sudden and shocking -- but much of its message feels as if it's being delivered by Western Union.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Hal Hinson
The picture amounts to little more than an uninspired, almost perfunctory exercise in "big game" manipulations.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Reality Bites principally turns on the romantic tension between Ryder, wonderfully radiant and not all that literate for the class valedictorian her character is purported to be, and Hawke, who does the alienated-poet thing better than anybody since Matt Dillon's greaser in "The Outsiders."- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
Martial arts maven Seagal has long been on deadly ground with critics, and this, his directorial debut, is likely to keep him there.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
An utterly pointless remake of Sam Peckinpah's hair-raising road movie. Updated and dumbed down, this anemic variation on the bloodier 1972 original is primarily an opportunity for those vast legions of Baldwin-Basinger voyeurs. You know who you are.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
In the end, family ties are re-strung, but the morals remain annoyingly at loose ends.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Desson Thomson
Treat this project as you would a safari: It has its slow parts but the wildlife makes it worthwhile.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Most of the humor is sophisticated slapstick, which Depardieu mastered in the hilarious trio of Francis Veber comedies he did with Pierre Richard in the '80s.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Stylishly gruesome and dementedly romantic, "Romeo" has its pervertedly funny moments, but in the end it's a bloody bummer that leaves a depressing aftertaste.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Desson Thomson
Scent is a captured memory, a living, breathing reverie rather than a narrative. It's also the birth of a great talent.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Car 54, Where Are You? is a stupid movie. Stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid. If you pay money to see it, then you're stupid.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
Grecian Formula and body corsets notwithstanding, Bronson looks like one of those sculpted potato heads and moves with appropriate grace. This is not the face of death; it's the face of old.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
A soulless replica of Don Seigel's 1956 model and Philip Kaufman's 1978 update.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
In between its hokey setup and its overwrought climax, Disney's dog-sledding adventure Iron Will is brisk and involving and surprisingly adult, its cinematic strength drawn mainly from the beauty of panting teams of huskies muscling their way across snowy landscapes. Which is a sight you can never grow tired of.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
Contains about enough laugh-out-loud sight gags and non sequiturs to justify what it demands of a viewer's time and money.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
An entertaining look under the tent flaps of the Clinton campaign, "The War Room" fairly bristles with the frenetic energy, flat-out fun and Southern-fried cunning that won the White House. It's a documentary, though not a hard-hitting one, about presidential politics as reinvented by Bill Clinton's cagey generals, George Stephanopoulos and James Carville.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Based on Gerry Conlon's own account of his arrest and subsequent incarceration, the film takes forever to do what "60 Minutes" does with the same meat in a single segment.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
The plot stumbles over genre cliches after a promising start and the whole thing becomes lamentable. As an indictment of a techno-society in which too much information is available by computer, it's simply unconvincing.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by