For 11,478 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
46% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
52% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 5.3 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 60
| Highest review score: | Oppenheimer | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Dolittle |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 6,014 out of 11478
-
Mixed: 3,069 out of 11478
-
Negative: 2,395 out of 11478
11478
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Desson Thomson
Between them, Clooney and Kidman would still need a third party to work up a personality. In fairness to both, they aren't given much to work with.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
While Soul Food aims to be the kind of hearty, satisfying story that sticks to your ribs, it comes across more like an appetizer or a midnight raid on the fridge. Tasty, but easily forgotten.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Hunter
Hanson delivers something ever rarer in film culture, not a new film noir but an old-fashioned total movie, somehow of a single piece.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Hunter
The film has a kind of echo-filled emptiness to it that some will take as profundity and others as mere emptiness.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Hunter
Amalric is low-key and immensely likable, but what makes his Paul a worthwhile companion on a three-hour voyage is his utter sincerity, coupled with self-aware irony. He's not a phony, a user, a Romeo or a slut. His earnestness is his best quality; he tries so hard to do the right thing, sometimes only failing by a little. [10 Oct 1997, p.N48]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Hunter
Certainly handsome, well made and for most of its running time gripping, the film ultimately turns into a $60-odd-million piffle.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Hunter
As an example of smash-mouth environmentalism, you'd be hard-pressed to surpass Fire Down Below. As an example of right-thinking American compassion and concern for our precious natural heritage and all the fuzzy fauna and fernyflora of the great outdoors, it's extremely forthright. And as a movie, it's a piece of drivel...Ugh! What a distasteful, silly, egomaniacal movie. [6 Sept 1997, p.D03]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Desson Thomson
If you're in the right frame of mind -- a sort of anything-goes, Elmore Leonard spirit -- this thing's going to be your kind of evening.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Hunter
You can feel Hoodlum hungering to be bigger than it possibly can be. It wants to be "The Godfather" of African Americans, a vast tale of crime and heroism and nerve and ambition. But it tries too hard and ends up feeling spotty rather than deep. [27Aug1997 Pg D.01]- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
Del Toro, expanding on a short story by Donald A. Wolheim, isn't able to invest his version of a familiar horror convention with either the supple wit or deep humanity he brought to "Cronos."- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
In filmmaker Mehta's deft hands, the outcome is handled with power and sensitivity. [22 Aug1 997, pg.N40]- Washington Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Hunter
Halfhearted and unsure. They want it both ways and in so doing, don't get it either way. Cute just goes so far. [22 Aug 1997, p.N37]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Although the newly paunchy Stallone is credible as a weak, conflicted small-time sheriff, this suburban "Serpico" is a noble, passionless charade.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Hunter
The movie is very loud. It is pointlessly loud, arbitrarily loud, assaultively loud.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Desson Thomson
Beaufoy and Cattaneo handle this potentially racy material with an engaging balance of good taste and outright slapstick.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Hunter
It is one of those soap bubbles of a film, fleeting, ephemeral, seemingly there when it is not. As you leave the theater, it diminishes with each step, collapsing into shards of imagery and sensations of movement. It's the film that never was.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Desson Thomson
This is a fully realized movie, whose intelligence -- despite its grim findings -- dwarfs any Hollywood production.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
The nonsensical screenplay can barely stand-up to the hellzapoppin, Beelzebubbin effects mustered by first-time director Mark Dippe.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Hunter
In all it wastes time, talent -- not least of all Reynolds's -- and money on an obscure mission. [30 Jul 1997, p.C02]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Hunter
Takes its absurd premise and keeps itself narrowly focused, pushing its heroic cast through obstacle after obstacle.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Hunter
Anyone who doesn't smile is probably either too adult to count or too dead to care.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Star Maps has youthful flaws -- all the Anglos, this film’s "others," are impotent or at least twisted -- but it is itself evidence of filmmaking’s power over Arteta, and his future power in the fantasy biz.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Classy fare, with posh settings, gorgeous scenery and lots and lots of polishing from director John Madden ("Ethan Frome") and writer Jeremy Brock.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Michael O'Sullivan
An unfunny comedy by Tony Vitale that is enacted not by fleshed-out characters but by hackneyed, two-dimensional stereotypes. There’re so many sexual and ethnic caricatures, it’s hard to know which is most offensive.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Brendan Fraser breathes loopy new life into the swinging '60s TV cartoon icon.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
In some ways, Contact is just like the universe: big, star-bright and seemingly endless. Not to mention that it begins with a big bang, gradually falls into a lull and finally succumbs to entropy.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Desson Thomson
The movie, which is based on the Lowell Cunningham comic book series, throws out some wonderful implications, but they’re frustratingly few and far between.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by