For 11,478 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
46% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
52% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 5.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 60
| Highest review score: | Oppenheimer | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Dolittle |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 6,014 out of 11478
-
Mixed: 3,069 out of 11478
-
Negative: 2,395 out of 11478
11478
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
A soppy songfest about a tubercular pea picker who drives to Nashville, where he hemorrhages and dies. It's unfit for human consumption. [17 Dec 1982, p.20]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
While Airplane II, proves to be a breezy and tolerably consistent follow-up to its successful prototype, a parodistic copy that relied less on jokes from the original might have seemed a shade fresher. [11 Dec 1982, p.C1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
The Toy, starring Richard Pryor, is a coarsened American remake of a deft French comedy of the same title, which starred Pierre Richard and passed this way five or six years ago. Fluctuating wildly between facetiousness and solicitude, the new version never comes close to reproducing the sane, lightweight charms of the original.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
There is enough action and general movement to satisfy younger moviegoers and enough gentility and creative thought to please everyone else. [26 Nov 1982, p.D1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Still of the Night emerges as not only failed, synthetic Hitchcock but also failed, synthetic slasher and failed, synthetic love story. [18 Dec 1982, p.C1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
A rousing and scenically breathtaking romance about ranch life in the 1880s, the film should recommend itself strongly to families. [24 Dec 1982, p.14]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Stallone is feral this film, physically powerful; he's muddy and bloody, but he's still pretty even in a tarpaulin. He's the wild child coming home. First Blood is good to the last drop, if you like that sort of thing. [22 Oct 1982, p.17]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Obliged to launch the hero on an effective counterattack down the stretch, Wallace goes through the motions proficiently enough for exploitation thriller purposes. He should have quit while he was ahead, but Halloween III demonstrates a reasonable ability to control comic-horror effects on his first derivative try. [27 Oct 1982, p.D9]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
More and more it seems that when all else fails, the director says, "Then let's make it zany." [09 Oct 1982, p.C11]- Washington Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
Let's Spend the Night Together is a disappointing souvenir, at best a sweet substitute for the many who couldn't catch the Stones live. The Stones' status has always excused their shortcomings, so this film won't shake the believers. But it won't convince the skeptics, either. [12 Feb 1983, p.C1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
From the outset, The Possession is calculated to make an alternately ludicrous and sadistic spectacle of the family's victimization.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Washington Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
Everything is utterly unbelievable; it's Blackboard Jungle without a moral intelligence, Rock and Roll High School without a soundtrack. Sitting through it is like paying for detention on a sunny day. [14 Oct 1982, p.D15]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
It's an uninspired blend, integrating the boys from "Porky's" and the girls from "Foxes" into a vehicle resembling the worst of "American Graffiti" and the best of "Rock and Roll High School." [13 Aug 1982]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Tom Shales
As directed by Steve Miner and shot by Gerald Feil, the film's use of 3-D is spectacularly and viciously effective. (Gray-lensed Polaroid glasses are handed out at the door; this 3-D process works much better than that used on recent 3-D TV broadcasts.) Not only sabers and butcher knives are tossed into the movie house, however; there are also such relatively benign protuberances as popping popcorn, a leaping snake and a blue yo-yo. From the back of a van, a hippie reaches out with a joint, and very early in the film the audience gets poked at with a pair of rabbit ears atop a television set. An opening scene of sheets flapping on a clothesline is attractively eerie, and a later shot of a victim sitting on a pier that juts into a pool of water is actually pretty. The playfulness is so engaging it's really too bad that the gore has to be so unrelenting, but the producers of these films are now trapped in their own excess [17 Aug 1982, p.B1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Atrocious. It's also pretentious, superfluous, superficial, shallow, dated and bilious. I'd pay money not to have seen this jumble of gooey special effects, sappy symbolism and out-of-it animation. [17 Sept 1982, p.13]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
A blockheaded travesty that fancies itself a rollicking update of "The Pirates of Penzance."- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Even the premise for this sputtering attempt at a picaresque farce seems to anticipate a vehicle prone to misfires and breakdowns. [12 Aug 1982, p.E1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Michael Keaton's the live wire and Henry Winkler's the deadbeat in director Ron Howard's new hit, Night Shift, a whorifying undertaking that solicits its laughs by pairing the quick and the dead.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Williams, might have been more aggressive. Otherwise, director Roy Hill has done about as well as you can when translating word to image, not only through plot, but via the repetition of symbols: primitive, obvious ones -- the toad, a death's head costume, a child's clumsy drawings. After two hours and 20 minutes, all the parables and paradoxes join in a sluggish whole. And we wind up where we began, up in the air without a tail gunner. [23 July 1982, p.11]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas isn't a movie about human nature at odds with itself, but a witless and unwitting mirror for Hollywood's worst instincts and onanistic conceits. [23 July 1982, p.11]- Washington Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
A Midsummer Night's Sex Comedy promises to take off every so often, but the material proves too slight for buoyant fancy. [16 July 1982, p.C1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Sadly, The Secret of NIMH is beautiful but unbalanced: The animators gambled when they should have gamboled. [09 July 1982, p.13]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
If Rogers moves through the film somewhat lethargically, Six Pack's bare-bones plot doesn't provide much inspiration. [20 July 1982, p.B4]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Tron turns out to be an inorganic Fantastic Voyage, a movie with which only a computer programmer could interface. The acting is everything you'd expect from a Disney film, with Jeff Bridges aping Harrison Ford for all he's worth. There's even a computerized tinkerbell and a computer kiss. It's all a little much too have output. [09 July 1982, p.13]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Grand enough in scale to carry its many Biblical and mythological references, Blade Runner never feels heavy or pretentious -- only more and more engrossing with each viewing. It helps, too, that it works as pure entertainment.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
John Carpenter's remake of The Thing is a wretched excess. It's not that originals are too sacred to be reinterpreted. They're period pieces that would have to be tinkered with to appear contemporary. They've simply been unlucky with their tinkerers, who haven't spruced up the pretexts without laying waste to the accompanying human interest, wit and thematic suggestiveness. [25 June 1982, p.C3]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Although Bostwick is left in the most exposed position by the nonsensical war games invented for Megaforce, it's obviously Needham who deserves the preeminent rap for fabricating a system of illusion so juvenile that the actors can scarcely avoid looking like chumps.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Firefox may sound bright, hot and racy, but it browns out. Eastwood has an energy crisis as director, producer and star. [18 June 1982, p.15]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Eager to seem warmhearted and endearing, Author! Author! is frustrated by Pacino's conspicuous resistance. If anything, this uncharacteristic vehicle illustrates his inability to lighten up an emphatically gloomy, brooding screen presence. [19 Jun 1982, p.C1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Spielberg has always demonstrated extraordinary aptitude for filmmaking, but "E.T." is far and away his most satisfying work to date. He knows how to transform the raw material of his childhood into an appealing popular fable. There are sequences that touch you to the quick in mysteriously casual ways- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
"Grease 2" is the most serendipitous sequel in recent memory. It is an ingratiating, jubilant improvement on a crummy original.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
While not significantly better or worse than the predecessor, a rather astounding object of devotion for a movie studio--an enormously expensive recreation of a moribund TV series--this sequel is perfectly presentable and harmless, a klunker as comfortable as your easy chair. [4 June 1982, p.D1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
A fitfully witty and reliably spine-tingling horror melodrama...While it works you over effectively, Poltergeist betrays a good deal of rather dubious, uncoordinated manipulation. [4 June 1982, p.D1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
It's obvious that Blank has been forced into many organizational shortcuts in an effort to stitch the random footage together.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
An engaging exercise in discreet, incisive and good-humored hokum. Although Rocky III is a vivid piece of popular filmmaking and a considerable bit of harmless fun, the star doesn't seem to derive as much pleasure from the experience as he should.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
The Road Warrior is ferocious and unpredictable. It's energetic. It's peculiar. It's big and it's dirty. But mostly it's cosmically irrelevant. Hey, but, one thing's for sure, we are driven.- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
A curiously overextended spoof of the cliche's of Hollywood's hard-boiled mystery melodramas of the 1940s. [21 May 1982, p.B4]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Paradise is about as romantic as sand in your pants. [07 May 1982, p.13]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The monster, an obvious HR Giger rip-off, looks completely different every time it’s onscreen; of course, it’s supposed to be continually mutating, but mostly it looks too immobile to be menacing.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
The Sword and the Sorcerer is neither sharp nor magical. [07 Aug 1982, p.C2]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Expertly acted, Chariots is an undeniable rouser. However, there's also something a trifle much about its very wholesomeness and likability.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
All the modest virtues of the original film have been discarded in favor of lurid excess. What was once unpretentious, suggestive, implicit and erotically tragic has become bombastic, literal-minded, explicit and erotically stupefying.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
A smooth and agreeable entertainment, Hero is easy to enjoy while you're watching it. But ultimately it adds up to far less than you hope for at the outset. [3 Apr 1982, p.C1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
What could be more frightening than an indestructible murdering mutant? Consider the unbelievably horrifying performance of Stephen Furst as Charlie, the sheriff's deputy. Couple Furst's incompetence with a scene like this one and you know real fear: Charlie tells Sheriff Dan that he just isn't made for law-enforcement. Not because he's incredibly out of shape and dumb as a post, not because he can't drive a squad car. No, no, no. It's worse. The coquettish Charlie confesses to some pretty grim experimentation of his own. He tells of giving his first puppie a bath by swishing it around in the toilet. Then he put it in the freezer to dry. Voila! the first freeze-dried pupsicle. [2 Apr 1982, p.11]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
The movie proves a curiously harmless pet of a black comedy: It barks and snaps at you in fitfully funny ways, but it's essentially tame, pipsqueaky and more than a trifle antiquated. [05 Nov 1982, p.D1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Judith Martin
It is, in sum, a sweet film, with the light- hearted theme of we-are-all-pretending-to- be-something-we're-not, and it's only gently naughty. [2 Apr 1982, p.11]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
This is a movie with an admittedly leftist slant. Some of the scenes are gruesome and powerful. But its politics are distracting, making the film less an artistic undertaking and more a political statement. [12 Feb 1982, p.11]- Washington Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Judith Martin
This is not really riveting material if you didn't go to high school with these boys, and perhaps not even if you did. Played by Steve Guttenberg, Daniel Stern, Mickey Rourke, Kevin Bacon and Timothy Daly, they seem fundamentally decent, but hopelessly trapped in the limits of the time and place. That grubby atmosphere, looked upon as endearing, is the only thing the film has to offer, and while it's amusing at first, one quickly gets the idea. [5 March 1982, p.11]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
A rotten 89 minutes of night photography and close-ups of a man with the face of a dessicated bulldog. There's no kick, just sick: people who weren't being paid to watch walked out of the screening. [23 Apr 1982, p.13]- Washington Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Tom Shales
Swamp Thing isn't completely successful at banishing the old corkers and stereotypes, but it's a harmless, watchable comic-book thriller, refreshingly suitable for kids of almost any age.[10 May 1982, p.C2]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Judith Martin
The non-judgmental state, in which the wrecking of a family is treated like a natural disaster for which there is no human responsibity or possiblity of control, is also true to the spirit of the society the film depicts. But it makes the film, like the marriage itself, seem irritatingly thoughtless. [19 Feb 1982, p.4]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Quest for Fire expresses an eloquent partiality for civilized virtues, especially companionship, sexual bonding and parenthood. [05 Mar 1982, p.B12]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Cannery Row is expendable and creaky, a lavishly mounted antique.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Unlike Hollywood's hygienic undersea dramas, Das Boot graphically depicts the nasty intimacy of a long mission.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
What lends the movie authenticity is that most of the people in it really are Olympic athletes and record-holders, and they show that they know what they're doing. The second lead, Patrice Donnelly, is a former Olympic hurdler.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
The unsavory nature of the concept is softened to a considerable extent by the ridiculous nature of the depiction. The performers are obliged to stumble through such a prolonged, outrageous dance of death that the stupidity of it all tends to obscure the viciousness of it all. [26 Feb 1982, p.D3]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Pennies From Heaven is a rejuvenating, landmark achievement in the evolution of Hollywood musicals, and certainly the finest American movie of 1981. [18 Dec 1981, p.C1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Judith Martin
An opportunity for an unusual film about teen-agers was thrown away, in Taps, in favor of what its own screenplay characterizes as a cinematic stereotype. [18 Dec 1981, p.21]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
On screen, Reds evolves into an earnestly muddled mishmash of Romance and History. An intriguing, ambitious disappointment, it launches the Christmas movie season on a note of droopy-spirited seriousness...It isn't the running time alone that makes Reds a tough sell and a discouraging endurance test; it's the lack of an emotional payoff strong enough to justify an epic trek down the corridors of history. [4 Dec 1981, p.D1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
A round of misfires from title to denouement, the new comedy "Modern Problems" is a modern problem for moviegoers: the latest rummy example of that strange abomination, the unfunny "fun" movie, victimized by utter confusion about its genre, tone and audience. [30 Dec 1981, p.B6]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Absence of Malice was directed with earnest, straightforward proficiency by Sydney Pollack, and there are crucial public issues involved in the premise. Still, excessively generous allowance must be made if one is to overlook the defects and confuse Absence of Malice with a pertinent, lucid melodrama on a hot topic. A remarkable number of journalists seem to be overcompensating for the film's mildness by treating it as something hard-hitting and usefully purgative. More power to the souls considerate enough to do the filmmakers' work for them, but look out for frustration if you're only prepared to meet them halfway. [18 Dec 1981, p.C9]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Directing his own starring vehicle, that sly boots Burt Reynolds gives the audience a shamelessly lurid but stylish going-over, while putting a clever new wrinkle or two on his own status.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Tom Shales
Once in the proper mood for Neighbors, however, the disappointing discovery is that there isn't a lot of movie there. Neighbors is by no means a laughless debacle like "Buddy Buddy," and as an ambiguous paranoid rattle around life's great cage, the film is funnier and less pretentious than "Being There." It's just too bad that it tends to send you home empty-headed.[24 Dec 1981, p.C1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Judith Martin
The movie insists that the fate of the world hangs on the actions of these people. If you buy that, you'll buy anything. [11 Dec 1981, p.31]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
The doting phoniness of the text has probably been aggravated rather than improved by a formidable casting coup -- uniting Henry Fonda and Katharine Hepburn for the first time in their illustrious careers and creating the shallowest heartwarmer in recent memory. [22 Jan 1982, p.C1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Time Bandits is a marvelous cinematic tonic, a sumptuous new classic in the tradition of time-travel and fairy-tale adventure. [06 Nov 1981, p.C1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
For all its boldness of concept and carnage, The Prowler is never entirely satisfying. There are too many missed opportunities to transcend the genre’s schlock, too many passages where nothing happens, too many scares that fall flat. Still, it’s an intriguing artifact of an earlier horror-movie era, one that toys with the idea of villains and victims while slashing the slasher formula to bits.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Ninety minutes of Shock Treatment feels like a week in "Mister Rogers' Neighborhood," a Quaalude interlude, a quart of Sanka laced with Valium. No jolt...Despite flashy lights, splashy sets and plump girls in tight white corsets, "S.T.'s" a bore -- a blatant try for teeny-punk bucks. It's a lesson for filmmakers: You can't force a cult film, they just happen. [28 May 1982, p.13]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
Trash or treat? Halloween II is as dumb as its prequel. The Great Pumpkin isn't going to be pleased with this one. [30 Oct 1981, p.17]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Despite formidable competition, Looker makes a persuasive case for Stinker of the Year among suspense thrillers. [30 Oct 1981, p.C6]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Tom Shales
"Halloween II" was funnier by accident than Saturday the 14th manages to be on purpose. Decidedly not a parody of all those very parodyable endangered teen-ager movies like "Friday the 13th" -- though that's what its misleading title implies -- "Saturday" merely resurrects a passel of haunted-house wheezes so antique that even the Bowery Boys would be driven to groans by them. [23 Nov 1981, p.C2]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Like their previous movies, it emerges as an interesting disappointment, reflecting a cultivated and audacious taste in material inhibited by a stuffy approach to filmmaking. The advantage of their intelligent, literate, methodical style is that it may accommodate novel themes and impressive performances. [28 Jan 1982, p.C11]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Judith Martin
A rather poetic costume drama jarringly interrupted by bits of modern banality. [02 Oct 1981, p.17]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
An intimate theater piece conceived for the movies, My Dinner With Andre illustrates how much human interest, entertainment value and even philosophical inquiry can be derived from a situation as static as a dinner conversation. It should also prove a great incentive for dining out and shooting the bull in general. [19 Jan 1982, p.D3]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
The new movie adorned with this sure-fire title happens to be a tacky and disreputable attempt at a sophisticated comedy about women writers.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Watcher in the Woods represents a botched effort by the Disney studio to locate a suitable opening somewhere within the flourishing genres of supernatural and horror fantasy.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Paternity may not be one of the dumbest excuses for a romantic comedy that ever littered the screen, but it certainly feels like a numbing inanity while you're exposed to it. [3 Oct 1981, p.C1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
Ultimately, it's hard to decide which is more deadly, the action or the dialogue. [26 Dec 1981, p.D5]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
What this ill-fated journey is all about are never rationally explained, but then it seems most of the little thought in Galaxy of Terror was put into the special defects, which include a crewmember whose head and tummy snap, crackle and pop; an arm that gets cut off and still manages to spite itself; and a tiny worm that grows and rapes a comely crew member to death. [12 Nov 1981, p.C17]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Mommie Dearest, the film version of Christina Crawford's poison-pen memoir of her adoptive mother, Joan Crawford, looms as wretched excess. Considering the source, however, this ill-advised and disreputable movie could have been worse.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Southern Comfort sets up a potentially compelling switch on The Most Dangerous Game, but Hill's tactical maneuvers prove too diffuse and uncoordinated to carry out a successful variation. [16 Oct 1981, p.B1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Judith Martin
Whatever is wrong with the plot, there's nothing wrong with the dialogue. With the Dunne-Didion lines and the acting of Robert DeNiro (the priest) and Robert Duvall (the detective), the lack of a cohesive story doesn't seem terribly important. It's the contrast between the brothers that's the point. [9 Oct 1981, p.21]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Tom Shales
A manifest abomination on every measurable level, So Fine, the painfully threadbare comedy opening today at area theaters, is easily as transparent as the peekaboo jeans that give the film its nominal but squandered topicality. The film's only conceivable distinction is that it could be the worst that Ryan O'Neal has ever made, and that's saying something. [25 Sept 1981, p.C6]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
- Washington Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Raggedy Man is starved for scenes that might fill out our scanty store of information--for example, a little more about the marriage, the love affair, her identity as a mother. Even the location needs to be filled out, since one forms the misimpression that Gregory is not so much a small town as a ghost town. Next time, the Fisks owe it to themselves to bite off enough material to chew. [03 Jul 1982, p.B3]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Judith Martin
Filmed in velvety browns, with shafts of sunlight filtered through old windows, The Haunting of Julia is a definite cut above the current horror movie cliche, but yet not up to the classic psychological ghost-story level it aims at.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
The setup is so conducive to hedonistic wish-fulfillment that it's a pity writer Dan Greenburg and director Alan Myerson lacked the wit to capitalize on it. [20 Nov 1981, p.C3]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
John Landis must have entertained greater aspirations for his new movie, "An American Werewolf in London," than the dismaying results he's stuck with -- a wasted clever title and a minor fiasco destined for an obscure niche in the scrapheap of horror movies.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rita Kempley
The infuriatingly slow pace proves a point, but it makes for a gritty-eyed viewer with mashed potatoes for brains...It's a relief to escape the theater after this one, though it's good for several hours of discussion over dinner. It's not entertaining, but it does fall into the should-see category. Pop a couple of Stress-Tabs before you go. [2 Oct 1981, p.17]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Never makes a subatomic particle of melodramatic or psychological sense yet nevertheless provokes an overwhelming proportion of women spectators into screaming fits. [19 Aug 1981, p.C1]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Although he brings a certain muscular prowess to the screen, Norris is grievously deficient of charm and humor. [11 Aug 1981, p.C8]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Although it frequently misfires and occasionally keeps firing away on empty satiric chambers, Student Bodies is a likably sarcastic and knowing assault on the cliche's of horror movies. [11 Aug 1981, p.C10]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Harrington
Heavy Metal is one of the worst ideas ever to be translated into a movie. [8 Aug 1981, p.C10]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Condorman is ingenious enough when it comes to mechanical resources. Its undoing is personality resources.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Judith Martin
In a light-hearted way, it portrays the Allies as children, their leaders as collaborators, a Nazi POW camp as boys' summer camp and the conflict as color war. And what's more, the Allied team gets so excited that they would rather win the game than escape from their captors. The whole concept is so outrageous that it hardly leaves time for one to consider the details. [31 July 1981, p.17]- Washington Post
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Playing with and making fun of paranoia is a DePalma specialty and he does it well. There are some very chilling touches in Blow Out. It's a good solid movie -- but it won't blow you away. [24 July 1981, p.D1]- Washington Post
-
- Critic Score
Albert Finney and a fine supporting cast try very hard, but they are frustrated at every turn by directionless direction and special effects that for the most part diminish the shocks and totally gut the climax. [24 July 1981, p.21]- Washington Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Arnold
Unfortunately, all too many paying customers will remember being suckered into the Derek remake of "Tarzan," which shortchanges every feature susceptible moviegoers must assume they'll find: tongue-in-cheek romance, exotic high adventure and generous scrutiny of Bo in the buff. Denying people the forms of amusement, notably erotic amusement, that the publicity suggests, Derek exposes a truly dangerous ineptitude.- Washington Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by