Wall Street Journal's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,942 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
44% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
54% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 2.6 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 62
| Highest review score: | Les Misérables | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | The Limits of Control |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 2,101 out of 3942
-
Mixed: 1,197 out of 3942
-
Negative: 644 out of 3942
3942
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
The movie's considerable emotional force springs from the splendor of its visual poetry. Mr. Bertolucci allows the sweep of 60 years of Chinese history to unfold around Pu Yi as background noise to his peculiar, poignant role in the emergence of modern China. [25 Nov 1987, p.1]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
The dialogue in "Broadcast News" is so quick and clever I wanted to see the movie again the minute it ended because I knew I couldn't have possibly caught it all. I caught most of it though, and certainly enough to know that this is one terrific movie. [15 Dec 1987, p.1]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
Wall Street is a silly, pretentious melodrama that panders to the current fascination with insider trading. [10 Dec 1987, p.1]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
With an edgy, intelligent script by playwright Tom Stoppard, Mr. Spielberg has made an extraordinary film out of Mr. Ballard's extraordinary war experience. [09 Dec 1987]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
The movie has its own genuine charm and one hilarious high: Billy Crystal & Carol Kane are simply wonderful. [24 Sept 1987, p.24(E)]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
Mr. Lyne is able to make things look the way they're supposed to look because he trained in the television-commercial world. But he has a hard time getting beneath the gloss. [17 Sep 1987, p.1]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
A warm-heared picture with some hot dancing, some B movie class consciousness, lots of nostalgia and lots of cliches. [3 Sept 1987, p.17(E)]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
Maybe the worst part (there's so much to choose from) is the sight of a good actor like Edward Herrmann parading around looking like a demented quarterback, the shoulders of his suit jacket grotesquely padded. Mr. Schumacher has dressed the adorable Corey Haim in even weirder getups, jackets with pastel stripes and little outfits that resemble dresses. The vampires aren't nearly as creepy as those clothes. [6 Aug 1987, p.1]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
By most standards of conventional film narrative, this movie is a mess. [25 June, 1987, p.22(E)]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
Lacking space for a proper review, let me say first that Tampopo is right up there with “Ratatouille” and “Big Night” when it comes to peerless movies about food.- Wall Street Journal
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
Hoffman and Beatty are so tone-deaf they don't even know how to play the songs for deadpan humor. They seem old, white, and without shtick. [14 May 1987, p.26(E)]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
These fraternal film makers have a lot of imagination and sense of fun - and, most of all, a terrific sense of how to manipulate imagery... But sometimes they seem to be getting too big a kick out of their own shenanigans. By the end, the fun feels a little forced. [26 Mar 1987, p.34(E)]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
Lethal Weapon is vulgar, violent and predictable. Yet, in some outbreak of id, I got caught up in the shenanigans of Danny Glover and Mel Gibson as a mismatched cop team. Mr. Glover is more than solid and Mr. Gibson has added a kind of raw humor to his repertoire that is extremely sexy. [5 Mar 1987, p.1]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
It's just that the picture doesn't have a strong idea behind it, just a fog of many half-expressed ideas. [26 Feb 1987, p.20(E)]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
This musical about a plant that craves blood has a smart and snappy score -- and Steve Martin in a hilarious bit as a dentist who gives himself laughing gas as he treats his unanesthetized patients. [23 Dec 1986, p.1]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
The picture's blandness - and hollowness - is startling when you consider the collaborators. [26 Nov 1986]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
Besides engineering top-notch performances from his actors, Mr. Demme also put together a soundtrack that enhances the movie's marvelous, quirky rhythms. He keeps you hooked into this unpredictable, pleasurable picture right through the closing credits. [6 Nov 1986]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
- Wall Street Journal
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
One of the least appealing movies I've seen in a while.... When a member of the audience belched loudly, that got the biggest laugh of the day. [17 June 1986, p.E26]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
It's all rather amusing, but after awhile you tire of all the perfect little nuances about characters who seem like prototypes for a certain type of Victorian novel. [6 Mar 1986, p.23(E)]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
The movie that remains is lovely to look at, but spiritless, a listless coquette. But then, 9 1/2 Weeks isn't about talk. It isn't about sadomasochism. It isn't even about sex. It's about looking good. [20 Feb 1986, p.1]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
Terry Gilliam's darkly funny and truly visionary retro-futurist fantasy is a mess dramatically, and its turbulent history echoes the battles fought by Orson Welles against studio executives bent on recutting or scuttling his films.- Wall Street Journal
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
When director Richard Attenborough isn't mangling dance numbers, he's focusing on a love story expressed almost entirely by means of close-ups of moony faces and teary eyes. [12 Dec 1985]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
This unpredictable and hilarious paranoid fantasy is a contemporary, urban "Wizard of Oz," peopled by punk artists and Yuppie vigilantes instead of wicked witches and Munchkins. [5 Sep 1985, p.1]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
The movie has the cartoonish realism of a Muppet movie. However, Mr. Herman is no Kermit the Frog, although he made me feel like Oscar the Grouch. [13 Aug 1985, p.1]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
Silverado looks great and moves fast. Mr. Kasdan has packed his action well against the fearsomely long, dusty stretches of Western plain. [11 Jul 1985, p.1]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
The makers of Return to Oz say that their rather bleak, nonmusical fantasy is more faithful to Mr. Baum's vision than "The Wizard of Oz" was. What's appropriate, however, isn't always what's right. All Ms. Balk can do is look earnest and young; Ms. Garland opened her mouth and out came Dorothy's soul.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
Actually, maybe the movie is better than it seems to be -- I just couldn't understand what anyone was saying. The dialogue came across as clear as schoolyard chatter during recess -- and just about as pleasant to listen to. There is a water slide, a pirate ship and an amusing little chubbikins (Jeff Cohen) who squirts Reddi Wip directly into his mouth. [20 Jun 1985, p.1]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
By the end there isn't anyone to cheer for, except the makers of this thoughtful and absorbing piece of work. [02 Aug 1984]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
This fairy tale is a weirdly enchanting mixture of old-fashioned whimsy and up-to-the-minute special effects. It brings back the early excitement of reading as a child, when the act of turning pages took on a magical quality. [19 Jul 1984, pg.1]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by