Wall Street Journal's Scores

  • Movies
  • TV
For 3,942 reviews, this publication has graded:
  • 44% higher than the average critic
  • 2% same as the average critic
  • 54% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 2.6 points lower than other critics. (0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 62
Highest review score: 100 Les Misérables
Lowest review score: 0 The Limits of Control
Score distribution:
3942 movie reviews
  1. Breakfast on Pluto, with an impressive cast that includes Liam Neeson and Brendan Gleeson, deploys its whimsy in many ways, all of them cloying.
    • Wall Street Journal
  2. Jennifer Aniston brings a needed liveliness to Derailed, though not enough to go around.
    • Wall Street Journal
  3. Still, the cynosure of all eyes is honest, articulate Elizabeth, her own woman in an era when women belonged to men, and at the same time full of love. Lizzie is the best, and Keira Knightley does right by her.
    • Wall Street Journal
  4. For a film filled with jagged shards of glass, and sometimes shot kaleidoscopically, through the windows of houses or cars, Bee Season is carefully, almost relentlessly, intended. That said, the script, by Naomi Foner Gyllenhaal, touches on themes that rarely make it to the big screen.
    • Wall Street Journal
  5. If I could find some facet to praise, I'd be glad to do so, but the production's mediocrity is all-pervasive -- story, character, graphic design, even music -- and it all points to a failure of corporate imagination, or maybe just nerve.
    • Wall Street Journal
  6. An exercise in inertia about an exercise in futility.
    • Wall Street Journal
  7. Spasms of kung fu wire fighting, Spider-Man acrobatics, huge explosions and a lethal polo game can't replace the first film's beating heart and witty soul.
    • Wall Street Journal
  8. Prime is neither deep nor as shallow as it first threatens to be, but surprisingly good fun.
    • Wall Street Journal
  9. A guaranteed downer that's devoid of any upside, and free of dangerously entertaining side effects.
    • Wall Street Journal
  10. A valuable film, provided one doesn't ask too much of it.
    • Wall Street Journal
  11. A feature-length documentary, by Dayna Goldfine and Dan Geller, of absolutely breathtaking sweep and joyous energy.
    • Wall Street Journal
  12. Here's a case of clichés transmuted, for the most part, into stirring entertainment.
    • Wall Street Journal
  13. This is a special film whose delicate tone ranges from tender to astringent, with occasional side trips into sweet.
    • Wall Street Journal
  14. Amazingly and incessantly funny, a free-form riff on Hollywood shenanigans, the film noir genre and film in general.
    • Wall Street Journal
  15. Domino is a new definition of a snuff movie. It snuffs out every vestige of feeling.
    • Wall Street Journal
  16. A saga of static set pieces and strenuously clever notions, this is a fiasco of a film if ever there was one.
    • Wall Street Journal
  17. Malevolence is in generous supply throughout the film. Easy enjoyment is not.
    • Wall Street Journal
  18. A long, slow slog through what could have been, and should have been, a more absorbing story.
    • Wall Street Journal
  19. Many movies these days are too long; this one, at 90 minutes, feels too short. That's because its purpose is so sharply defined: a tight close-up, in black and white, of a single, seminal moment -- a black and white moment -- in American history, and American journalism.
    • Wall Street Journal
  20. Manipulative, but confidently so, and improbably but consistently affecting.
    • Wall Street Journal
  21. The absence of any nuance in the father's character bespeaks the filmmaker's unwillingness to trust his audience. Making the movie may have been therapeutic for him, but I can't say the same about watching it.
    • Wall Street Journal
  22. The illusion is seamless and the pleasure is boundless.
    • Wall Street Journal
  23. What Mr. Hoffman has done here borders on the miraculous.
    • Wall Street Journal
  24. The movie's smugness is insufferable.
    • Wall Street Journal
  25. This peculiarly predictable picture has been calculated, or miscalculated, to set up certain expectations, fulfill them, and then do the same thing again, thereby giving us a chance to see what's coming and, at least in theory, be shocked when it actually comes.
    • Wall Street Journal
  26. Two dramatic problems beset Roman Polanski's darkly handsome new film of the Dickens novel. The boy is as passive as ever, and bleak in the bargain -- instead of glowing like the Oliver of the musical, he takes light in -- while Ben Kingsley's Fagin and Jamie Foreman's Bill Sikes manage to make villainy a bit of a bore.
    • Wall Street Journal
  27. I wish I could report the arrival of an impressive movie, but this one, for all its ostensibly big ideas about mathematics and wounded minds, struck me as an elaborate pretext for a synthetic love story.
    • Wall Street Journal
  28. Not everything is illuminated in his (Liev Schreiber) version, but the book's humanity and humor shine through.
    • Wall Street Journal
  29. This stop-action animated feature is downright sweet and tender, as well as all the other things we've come to expect from him -- funny, bizarre, graphically stunning and blithely necrophilic.
    • Wall Street Journal
  30. The intricacies here are moral and ethical, and they're fascinating.
    • Wall Street Journal

Top Trailers