For 2,973 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
53% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
45% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 2.2 points higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 67
| Highest review score: | Paterson | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Life Itself |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,806 out of 2973
-
Mixed: 937 out of 2973
-
Negative: 230 out of 2973
2973
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Schickel
A performance like De Niro's, in a well-made entertainment like Midnight Run, is cheap at any price. And capable of restoring the audience's faith in the form. [25 July 1988]- Time
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Schickel
What Willis proves in Die Hard is that it is not one you can ease through, especially if your preparation runs more to body building than to character building. [July 25, 1988]- Time
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Corliss
Eastwood can earn both laughs and respect just by standing in a crowded elevator and grunting ''Swell'' to his boss. Truth is, this time around, he doesn't get to do much else. [18 July 1988, p.73]- Time
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Schickel
Coming to America seems to be more career move than movie. After the raucousness of Beverly Hills Cop II and the raunchiness of Eddie Murphy Raw, the star apparently wants to assert his claim on the currently vacant title of America's Sweetheart. His aspirations must be bigger and badder than that. We want -- may actually need -- something more from this gifted man than Eddie Murphy Tame. [4 July 1988 p.66]- Time
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Corliss
Something got lost in the move from storyboard to screen, and in the stretch from seven minutes to 103. [27 June 1988]- Time
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Corliss
Belushi mines quick charm out of his surly role. And Arnold, starched tongue in cheek, is a doll: G.I. Joe in Soviet mufti. He could beat the stuffing out of a toy Rambo. [20 June 1988, p.88]- Time
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Corliss
Shelton has written the wittiest, busiest screenplay since Moonstruck, and his three stars do their very best screen work. [20 June 1988]- Time
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Schickel
There are, of course, low cunning, high explosives and much running around without a shirt, punctuated with other familiar gambits: torture scenes; the self-cauterization of, and instant recovery from, a wound large enough to stop an elephant; and a grimly preposterous two-man stand against a tank-led army. What few are likely to find amusing is Rambo III's story line. [30 May 1988, p.64]- Time
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Corliss
Wings of Desire works hard to be both an essay and a love story, a mural and an intimate portrait. To savor this film, the viewer must work hard too. But when the artists behind the screen and the angels in the audience meet, it's like a smoke and coffee: fantastic! (1998 May 9, p. 79)- Time
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Corliss
Along with other cast members, Penn takes ages registering his stares and scowls, until the movie is finally not about gangs but about actors' attitudes. Dressed up in '80s street slang, this is a '60s exercise in Method excess. [18 Apr 1988]- Time
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Corliss
Beetlejuice means something good: that imaginative artists can bring a fading genre back from the dead. [11 Apr 1988]- Time
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Corliss
See Hairspray. It's light and airy, but it will stick around: the first aerosol movie. [29 Feb 1988, p.101]- Time
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Corliss
The most beguiling romantic comedy this side of "Broadcast News." [11 Jan 1988]- Time
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Schickel
Very simply, Bertolucci has found an elegance of design and execution that few of his contemporaries could even dream of. [23 Nov 1987]- Time
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Corliss
In this judicious, irresistible romantic comedy, all the performers are tops. [14 Dec 1987, p.82]- Time
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Corliss
The entire film is in fact a ferocious meditation on the dilemma of a son choosing his father. Which one will Bud emulate: the noble failure or the triumphant sleaze? The outcome is never really in doubt, so streamlined and predictable are the characters. [14 Dec 1987, p.82]- Time
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Corliss
Spielberg has energized each frame with allusive legerdemain and an intelligent density of images and emotions.- Time
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Schickel
It is, of course, always a pleasure to watch Martin's steam-gauge face register his rising internal pressures and to witness his exquisitely expressed blowoffs. But Candy offers even more insinuating delights. Covering lonely need with empty gab, insecurity with a not entirely trustworthy savvy, he is the most dangerous kind of pest, the type who worms rather than blusters his way into your life.- Time
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Corliss
Near Dark has filmmaking finesse to spare, but puts its dank characters on display rather than cadging sympathy for them. It is the Blue Velvet of date-night spook shows.- Time
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Corliss
As you watch this enchanting fantasy, feel free to be thrilled or to giggle, as you wish. This time, Happily Ever After lasts 98 minutes. [21 Sept 1987]- Time
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Schickel
Maurice (pronounced Morris) is all high-mindedness and good taste. It has no emotional tension or - heaven forfend - strong expression of frustration or need.- Time
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Corliss
Well-made fictions like Fatal Attraction prosper because they seem more persuasive than fact.- Time
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Corliss
With his round, ruddy face, Tighe always seems on the verge of derisive laughter or flash-fisted rage; it's enjoyable guessing which fever will surface first. The rest of the movie is less entertaining, a righteous homily without the grits.- Time
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Schickel
If the ending of Eleanor Bergstein's script is too neat and inspirational, the rough energy of the film's song and dance does carry one along, past the whispered doubts of better judgment. [14 Sept 1987]- Time
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Schickel
A movie that manages to be atmospherically rich while also satisfying the slash-crash imperatives of the police-action genre.- Time
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Schickel
Indeed, viewers who arrive at the movie five minutes late and leave five minutes early will avoid the setup and payoff for the preposterous twist that spoils this lively, intelligent remake of 1948's The Big Clock.- Time
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Time
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Schickel
A lot of the gags are pretty good. It's not that Star Wars is less worthy of satire than horse opera or gothic horror. It's not that Mel Brooks has lost his cunning, though he does need a freedom of speech not to be found under a PG rating. What's missing is that zany old gang of his. There is simply nobody like them on this trip. [13 July 1987, p.68]- Time
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Corliss
Martin, who wrote the pretty-funny, too-soppy script, means to drink from the river this time. He wants it all: laughs, tears, low comedy, uplift. It doesn't quite happen, partly because the movie begs for poignance like an orphaned puppy, partly because modern plastic surgery makes the plot anachronistic, partly because, even with his Cyranose, C.D. is a darned sight more attractive than his beefy rival. Aaaahh, who cares, as long as Steve Martin gets a chance to strut his physical grace, wrap his mouth around clever dialogue, clamber up to rooftops like a Tarzan of the Northwest, give new life to the old-fashioned nobility of the love letter, and drink wine through his nose?- Time
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Schickel
Mamet's elegantly efficient script does not waste a word, and De Palma does not waste a shot. The result is a densely layered work moving with confident, compulsive energy.- Time
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by