The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,482 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 0.9 points higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,940 out of 3482
-
Mixed: 1,344 out of 3482
-
Negative: 198 out of 3482
3482
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- Critic Score
With its charming performances, bubble-gum colors, and intentionally funny product placements, the movie is like a kiss in a candy store—silly and sweet.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
The film, despite its raggedness, is stirring. In the end, this failed mission seems like the most impressive achievement of the entire space program: a triumph not of planning but of inspired improvisation.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
Disney may have seen lightning strike for the fifth consecutive time with this animated smash, but it's the weakest of the bunch: a bland, predictably p.c. story so taken up with teaching lessons about tolerance and the environment that it leaves hardly any room for laughter.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
Schumacher's direction is coarse and slovenly: the picture has the self-conscious jokiness of the "Batman" TV series and the smudged, runny imagery of a cheaply printed comic book.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
The director, Frank Marshall, who has produced films for Steven Spielberg, gets his own Michael Crichton book to play with—and the results are disastrous.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Screenwriter Richard LaGravenese and director Clint Eastwood have turned out something sombre and restrained -- almost, in fact, good (though it's too long).- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
McTiernan supplies one climax after another, but when the whole intense, meaningless experience is over you may have trouble putting a name or a face to the movie that just had its way with you.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
The action is loud and flashy, but there isn't really much suspense. The movie operates in such well-charted waters that it feels less like a dangerous naval mission than like a luxury cruise: the accommodations are cozy and the activities carefully planned.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The required resolution is a long time in coming, but there's plenty to keep you diverted, including the light backchat among the semi-weirdos who make up the brothers' family, and Bullock's ridiculously watchable performance.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The writer and director, Jeremy Leven -- himself a former shrink -- has taken a heavy conceit and lightened it into comedy, which is what it deserves.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Although it's an agreeable movie, Caton-Jones's direction is too discreet -- too civilized -- to stir the viewer's blood.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
The story moves forward smoothly, but the pace is too even and the course is predictable.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
Although there isn't anything startlingly original in this tale of three Catholic girls falling in love in late-fifties Ireland, it gets a sweet telling in Pat O'Connor's pretty film.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The charm -- the midsummer enchantment -- never feels forced; it steals up and wins you. A true romance.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Michael Sragow
But the screenplay for this deliberately over-the-top (under-the-bottom?) farce—about Carrey's unwitting retrieval of some ransom money and his effort to return it to his dream gal (Lauren Holly) in Aspen—doesn't pass muster as a string of moronic skits (studded with urine and fart jokes) or as a lampoon of buddy movies.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The movie is as smooth and deadening as a quart of old whiskey, and every bit as depressing as it was meant to be. But why do it at all? [23 Nov. 1994]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The director, Neil Jordan, and his cinematographer, the great Philippe Rousselot, have given the movie an extraordinary seductive look, but Rice (who wrote the screenplay) doesn't provide enough narrative to keep the audience satisfied.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Michael Sragow
Tim Allen's talent for dry regular-guyness fails to kindle Disney's sappy big-screen Yule log.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The movie has a hard forties snap to it -- lust is a weapon and love is a letdown.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Michael Sragow
The humor of two clerks arguing about ethics and sex deflates before the halfway mark, but the writer-director, Kevin Smith, dishes up some funny profanity in his low-budget black-and-white debut.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The architecture of Pulp Fiction may look skewed and strained, but the decoration is a lot of fun. [10 Oct 1994, p.95]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
This light-toned but thematically substantial autofiction is organized like a sequence of diary entries brought to life with Moretti’s wryly confessional voice-overs.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The picture's real strength is its witty, vigorous evocation of the fifties media world.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Too long, but it feels sturdy and stirring – there's an old fashioned decency in the way that it exerts, and increases, its claim upon our feelings. [26 Sept 1994, p.108]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The filmmakers haven't simply tamed the rogue elephant of Clancy's narrative; they've turned it into something that moves as gracefully and as powerfully as a gazelle.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Michael Sragow
The funniest moment comes when Carrey mimes the effects of the Mask without special effects.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The tale begins and ends in a flurry of joke violence; Cameron has decided to spoof what he used to take seriously, and the result, though bright and deafening, feels oddly slack -- he loosens the screws, and our interest drops away.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Michael Sragow
A movie about mother-son incest may sound like a daring writing-directing début, but David O. Russell, the fledgling auteur, stacks the deck like an old sharpie.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by