The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,482 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 0.8 points higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,940 out of 3482
-
Mixed: 1,344 out of 3482
-
Negative: 198 out of 3482
3482
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The joke buried in Tabloid is that this sexual obsessive is very likely not a sexual person at all.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jul 18, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
When the movie was over, a young boy sitting behind me said, "That was great!" He was satisfied, and rightly so.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jul 18, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Larry Crowne is worryingly light on laughs, yet it never dares to worry too much about the plight of its central figure. [11 & 18 July 2011, p.100]- The New Yorker
Posted Jul 4, 2011 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The first ten or fifteen minutes of Michael Bay's movie tremble, unaccountably, on the verge of being fun. [11 & 18 July 2011, p.101]- The New Yorker
Posted Jul 4, 2011 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Road to Nowhere is a dead end. Most of the performances are carved from balsa wood. [13 & 20 June 2011, p. 129]- The New Yorker
Posted Jun 6, 2011 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Best of all -- and the only thing that has really made me laugh at the movies this year -- is a lengthy scene in which Coogan, inspired by the landscape, confesses his desire to star in a traditional costume drama. [13 & 20 June 2011, p. 128]- The New Yorker
Posted Jun 6, 2011 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
In all, this is a movie that is partial to youth as a state of being. The grownups seem finished, as frozen in their lifetime roles as creatures out of myth or the Bible. But Oliver and Jordana have the freedom to go anywhere, do anything, become anything. Submarine is an exhilarating surprise.- The New Yorker
- Posted May 30, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The Hangover Part II isn't a dud, exactly - some of it is very funny, and there are a few memorable jolts and outlandish dirty moments. But it feels, at times, like a routine adventure film set overseas.- The New Yorker
- Posted May 30, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Tucked away inside the grandeur, though, and enlivened by jump cuts, is a sharp, not unharrowing story of a father and son, and, amid one's exasperation, there is no mistaking Malick's unfailing ability to grab at glories on the fly.- The New Yorker
- Posted May 23, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
It's essentially a skit idea, not a dramatic idea, and the best the movie does with it is to repeat it. What saves Bridesmaids is Feig's love of performers - in particular, his love of actresses.- The New Yorker
- Posted May 16, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Midnight has one big problem: Allen hardly gives Gil a perceptive moment. He's awestruck and fumbling - he doesn't possess, to our eyes, the conviction of a writer. But who knows? He's young.- The New Yorker
- Posted May 16, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The year's most divided movie to date; everything that happens in the higher realms, vaguely derived from Nordic legend, is posturing nonsense, whereas the scenes down here are managed, for the most part, with dexterity and wit. [16 May 2011, p. 133]- The New Yorker
Posted May 12, 2011 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The result is a sad suburban pastoral, a strain of film you don't see much of, or not enough; it may feel somewhat stretched, and Rush's additions to Carver barely push it past ninety minutes, but anything hectic or hasty would have spoiled the mood. [16 May 2011, p. 132]- The New Yorker
Posted May 12, 2011 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The eye must travel not merely through the earth's crust but backward in time, as well. Indeed, you could argue that Herzog has succeeded in making the world's first movie in 4-D. [2 May 2011, p. 88]- The New Yorker
Posted May 7, 2011 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Barnard's film, as if nervous of being felled by the straightforward, sinewy thump of Dunbar's writing, ducks and weaves in a series of sly approaches. [2 May 2011, p. 89]- The New Yorker
Posted May 7, 2011 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
As director, Foster, working with Kyle Killen's screenplay, treats the goofy premise with a literal earnestness-as a family drama about separation and reunion-that seems all wrong. A little wit would have helped.- The New Yorker
- Posted May 2, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The battle scenes are extraordinarily mucky and violent, but here, as in Tavernier's "Let Joy Reign Supreme," the intricate protocols of aristocratic sexual passion are the most startling elements. The movie, however, is opaque at its center. [25 April, 2011 p. 89]- The New Yorker
Posted Apr 22, 2011 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Has so many things wrong with it that one can only stare at the screen in disbelief. [25 April, 2011 p. 89]- The New Yorker
Posted Apr 22, 2011 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
When Wright literalizes the fantastic, the movie turns squalid. He does better when he lets his visual fancies roam free. [25 April, 2011 p.88]- The New Yorker
Posted Apr 22, 2011 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
In The Conspirator, one wishes that the director had found the grace to touch upon, rather than belabor, the parallels between the conspirators of 1865 and the present-day inmates of Guantánamo.- The New Yorker
- Posted Apr 11, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Source Code is a formally disciplined work -- a triumph of movie syntax -- made with rhythm and pace. Jones, unlike most commercial directors, accelerates the tempo without producing visual gibberish. [11 April, 2011 p. 88]- The New Yorker
Posted Apr 8, 2011 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Reichardt is trying, as she was in her previous film, "Wendy and Lucy," for a mood of existential objectivty. She takes us from the florid grandiosity of Western myth to the bone-wearying stress of mere life. [11 April, 2011 p.89]- The New Yorker
Posted Apr 8, 2011 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The trouble with Super, as with "Kick-Ass," is that the director wants to have his cake, put a pump-action shotgun up against the frosting, blast vanilla sponge over a wide area, and THEN eat it. [4 April, 2011, p. 83]- The New Yorker
Posted Apr 3, 2011 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Above all, what makes the movie work -- what renders it not merely exhausting but fulfilling -- are the boys. Bier summons fine performances all around, but Nielsen, in particular, turns the role of christian into a drama all its own. [4 April, 2011, p. 82]- The New Yorker
Posted Apr 3, 2011 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
I'm more than ready to welcome a new style and a new metaphysic, but I still respond with skepticism and exasperation to Weerasethakul's work, which is sensuous and ruminative but also flat, almost affectless. [28 March 2011, p. 116]- The New Yorker
Posted Mar 23, 2011 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The movie is all whoosh and whack and abrupt closeups -- jerky digital punctuation. It's alienating experience, without emotional resonance or charm. [28 March 2011, p. 116]- The New Yorker
Posted Mar 23, 2011 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
A lot more fun than bludgeoning, soul-draining follies like "Terminator Salvation" or the "Transformers" films, and, with a decisive trim, it could truly have fulfilled its brief as a bright, semi-abstract pop fantasy, at once excitable and disposable. Oddly, it did once exist in that form: in the first trailer.- The New Yorker
- Posted Mar 14, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
- Posted Mar 14, 2011
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The movie collapses into banality. The marriages hang together, but fear and guilt provide the glue. Perhaps the biggest insult to women here is the idea that they can't get better men than these two vacuous guys. [14 March 2011, p. 78]- The New Yorker
Posted Mar 12, 2011 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The movie is amiable enough: the young Australian actress Teresa Palmer is lovely and crisp, and the Canadian writer-director Michael Dowse manages the party traffic well. [14 March 2011, p.79]- The New Yorker
Posted Mar 12, 2011 -
Reviewed by