The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,481 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1.1 points higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,939 out of 3481
-
Mixed: 1,344 out of 3481
-
Negative: 198 out of 3481
3481
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The movie isn’t a desecration, but it’s action filmmaking, not America, that needs to be reborn.- The New Yorker
- Posted Mar 25, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Cool, violent, a cigarette dangling from his mouth, Gosling reprises his inexorable-loner routine from “Drive.” Cianfrance and the screenwriters Ben Coccio and Darius Marder wrote thirty-seven drafts of the script, but gave him almost nothing to say. He rides, he smokes, he knocks over banks, he loves his baby, and that’s it.- The New Yorker
- Posted Mar 25, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
In short, there are moments, in this very uneven film with its lamination of the ancient and the monstrously new, when the spirit of Fellini hovers overhead like a naughty angel. [25 March 2013, p.109]- The New Yorker
Posted Mar 20, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Who will stay with this film, and glorify it? Two sorts, I reckon: real revellers, randy for sensation, out of their heads; and, a block away, coffee-drinking Ph.D.s, musing on the cinema of alienation, too lost inside their heads to break for spring. [25 March 2013, p.108]- The New Yorker
Posted Mar 20, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Singer honors a child's desire not only for adventure but for noble deeds, for loyalty and friendship. [18 March 2013, p.87]- The New Yorker
Posted Mar 18, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
At the center of the movie, in place of the ardent, emotionally pulverizing Judy Garland, there is James Franco...as he smirks and winks, his reflexive self-deprecation comes off as a gutless kind of cool, and it sinks this odd, fretful, uncertain movie like a boulder. [18 March 2013, p.86]- The New Yorker
Posted Mar 18, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Stroker slips down the gullet with less fuss, but there are enough blood sprays and snapped vertebrae to pacify the director's clamorous fan club -- and, for the rest of us, plenty of chances to reconsider his style. It is, unquestionably, something to behold. [8 March 2013, p.80]- The New Yorker
Posted Mar 7, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Strangest of all, we go along with it in a sort of dream, scarcely pausing to complain, so expert is Mungiu at drawing us into the fold of these passionate souls. [8 March 2013, p.80]- The New Yorker
Posted Mar 7, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The best movie ever made about Chilean plebiscites, NO thoroughly deserves its Oscar nomination for Best Foreign Film.- The New Yorker
- Posted Feb 18, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
I hesitate to ask, but did anyone actually tell McClane, before he arrived, that the Cold War is over?- The New Yorker
- Posted Feb 18, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
In Side Effects, the working out of the thriller plot is accomplished with too much verbal explanation. [11 & 18 Feb. 2013, p.114]- The New Yorker
Posted Feb 9, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The result feels, like Shakespeare's play, at once ancient and dangerously new.- The New Yorker
- Posted Feb 1, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
If only Kim had a sense of humor to match his visual wit. Instead, we get rusted gags and rubbery acting.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jan 28, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
In all, these men and women don't seem to have the seething ambitions and the restlessness of so many Americans. They don't expect to get rich, somehow, next year. They may be happier than we are but they're also less colorful. [28 Jan. 2012, p.80]- The New Yorker
Posted Jan 24, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Movies are good at this sort of brute physicality, but the trouble with The Impossible is that is also tells a rather banal story. [28 Jan. 2012, p.81]- The New Yorker
Posted Jan 24, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
A trim thriller with an enviable lack of grandeur. [21 Jan. 2013, p.79]- The New Yorker
Posted Jan 19, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The over-all result is a misstep for Fleischer. [21 Jan. 2013, p. 78]- The New Yorker
Posted Jan 19, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
On the Road is always on the verge of imparting some great truth, but it never arrives. [14 Jan. 2013, p.79]- The New Yorker
Posted Jan 13, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Like so many earnestly conceived morality tales, Promised Land is built around a man's quandaries. Any actor less skilled and sympathetic than Damon might have betrayed the material into obviousness. [14 Jan. 2013, p.78]- The New Yorker
Posted Jan 13, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
What makes Amour so strong and clear is that it allows Haneke to anatomize his own severity.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 31, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
By the time Tarantino shows up as a redneck with an unexplained Australian accent, Django Unchained has mislaid its melancholy, and its bitter wit, and become a raucous romp. It is a tribute to the spaghetti Western, cooked al dente, then cooked a while more, and finally sauced to death.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 31, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
It's a relief to see Sacha Baron Cohen, in the role of a seamy innkeeper, bid goodbye to Cosette with the wistful words "Farewell, Courgette." One burst of farce, however, is not enough to redress the basic, inflationary bombast that defines Les Misérables. Fans of the original production, no doubt, will eat the movie up, and good luck to them. I screamed a scream as time went by.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 31, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
For Apatow, one guesses, the only things that can forestall death are comedy (the movie is full of superb comics, including Albert Brooks and Melissa McCarthy) and the flourishing of his children, Maude and Iris, who appear in the movie as Debbie and Pete's daughters.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 17, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The virtue of Zero Dark Thirty, however, is that it pays close attention to the way life does work; it combines ruthlessness and humanity in a manner that is paradoxical and disconcerting yet satisfying as art.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 17, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
"All good stories deserve embellishment," Gandalf says to Bilbo before they set off, and one has to ask whether the weight of embellishment, on this occasion, makes the journey drag, and why it leaves us more astounded than moved. And yet, on balance, honor has been done to Tolkien, not least in the famous riddle game between Bilbo and Gollum.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 10, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Central Park is at first discomforting, then enraging, then illuminating.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 3, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The film is perceptive and shrewd about such matters as the awkwardness of two kinds of aristocracy and power brought face to face. But "Hyde Park" never catches fire.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 3, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Rust and Bone might as well be called "Water and Light"; it glitters and flares with the urge to renew those things - limbs, knuckles, lovemaking, and parental bonds - which are easily fractured and lost.- The New Yorker
- Posted Nov 26, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
What is most disconcerting about Dominik's film is his choice of rhythm. We pass from reams of conversation, or cantankerous monologue, to throes of extreme violence, then back to the flood of words - most of them to do with buying, selling, slaying, whoring, or doing time.- The New Yorker
- Posted Nov 26, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Pretty much a miscalculation from beginning to end. [26 Nov. 2012, p.87]- The New Yorker
Posted Nov 26, 2012 -
Reviewed by